DOCSLIB.ORG

The Protection of Confidentiality in Arbitration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Protection of Confidentiality in Arbitration The Protection of Confidentiality in Arbitration Balancing the Tensions Between Commerce and Public Policy Julian Christopher Patric Brown Doctor of Philosophy London Metropolitan University February 202 1 ‘The English have always been more given to peacableness and industry than other people and rather than go so far as London and be at so great charges with Attorneys and Lawyers, they will refer their differences to the Arbitration of their Parish Priests … or to the Arbitration of honest neighbours’ - Angliæ Notitia by Edward Chamberlayne, 1684 ‘The two systems (arbitration and litigation) ought indeed to be properly regarded as co-ordinate rather than rival’1 - Lord Parker CJ 1 Lord Parker CJ cited in R. Finch, ‘London: Still the Cornerstone of International Commercial Arbitration and Commercial Law?’(2004) 70(4)Arbitration 2004 256, 269. ii Abbreviations AAA American Arbitration Association AALCO Asian African Legal Consultative Organization ABA American Bar Association ACIC Arbitration Centre of Iran Chamber ACICA Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration ADCCAC Abu Dhabi Conciliation and Arbitration Centre ADGM Abu Dhabi Global Market AIA Italian Arbitration Association AIAC Asian International Arbitration Centre ALF Association of Litigation Funders ASA Association Suisse de l’Arbitrage (Swiss Arbitration Association) ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations ATE After-the-event insurance BAIAC Beihai Asia International Arbitration Centre BTE Before-the-event insurance CAS Court of Arbitration for Sports CCIAG Corporate Counsel International Arbitration Group CEDR Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution CEPANI Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation CFA Conditional Fee Agreement CFBU Consumer Financial Protection Bureau CIArb. Chartered Institute of Arbitrators CIETAC China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission CIETAC HK China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, Hong Kong Arbitration Centre Civ. Div. Civil Division Ch. D. Chancery Division CJ Chief Justice Com. Ct. Commercial Court CTF Coffee Trade Federation CLC International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992 CLC (Bunkers) International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (Bunker Convention), 2001 CPR Civil Procedure Rules DBA Damages-based-agreement DBA Regulations Damages-Based Agreement Regulations 2013. DAC Departmental Advisory Committee [on Arbitration Law] DIAC Dubai International Arbitration Centre DIFC Dubai International Financial Centre Arbitration Institute DIS Deutsche Institution für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (German Institute of Arbitration) EC European Community ECA European Court of Arbitration ECAFE United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East ECHR European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. ECOSOC United Nations Economic and Social Council EEC European Economic Community EU European Union FAA Federal Arbitration Act of United States of America (1926) FCC Finland Chamber of Commerce FD&D Freight, Demurrage and Defence iii FOSFA Federation of Oils Seeds and Fats GA General Average GAFTA Grain and Feed Trading Association GMAA German Maritime Arbitrators Association HKIAC Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre HRA Human Rights Act 1998 IACS International Association of Classification Societies. IBA International Bar Association IBA Rules IBA Rules of Ethics for International Arbitrators ICA Indian Council of Arbitration ICC International Chamber of Commerce ICCA International Council for Commercial Arbitration ICCA Handbook International Council for Commercial Arbitration Handbook ICDR International Centre for Dispute Resolution (American Arbitration Association) ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes IDRC International Dispute Resolution Centre ILA International Law Association J Judge Jackson Report Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report (2009) JCAA Japan Commercial Arbitration Association KCAB Korean Commercial Arbitration Board LCIA London Court of International Arbitration LJ Lord Justice LR Lloyd’s Register Classification Society Lloyd’s Rep. Lloyd’s Law Reports LMAA London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association LME London Metal Exchange LMLN Lloyd’s Maritime Law Newsletter LRBA London Rice Brokers’ Association MIArb. Malaysian Institute of Arbitrators MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NAI Netherlands Arbitration Institute PCA Permanent Court of Arbitration (The Hague) QMU Queen Mary University RICS Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors SCAI Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution (Swiss Chambers) SCC Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Institute SCMA Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration SIAC Singapore International Arbitration Centre SIArb. Singapore Institute of Arbitrators SMA Society of Maritime Arbitrators TAE The Academy of Experts TAI Thai Arbitration Institute TPF Third Party Funding/Third Party Funder UIA Union Internationale des Avocats UN United Nations UNCITRAL United Nations Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL Model Law UNCITRAL Model law on International Commercial Arbitration UNCITRAL Rules 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 1976 UNCITRAL Rules UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 2010 VIAC Rules VIAC Rules of Arbitration (Vienna Rules) VLCC Very large crude carrier WIPO World Intellectual Property Organisation iv Wreck Removal Convention Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks ZCC Zurich Chamber of Commerce v Table of Cases English Cases A v B [2019] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 275 A & Ors v B & Anor [2011] EWHC 2345 (Comm) A Monk & Co Ltd v Devon County Council [1978] 10 BLR 9 Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Co Ltd v Eastern Bechtel Corporation [1982] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 425 AG v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1988] 3 All ER 545 Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd. v Customs and Excise Comrs [1972] 2 QB 102 Ali Shipping Corporation v Shipyard Trogir [1998] 2 All ER 136; [1999] 1 WLR 314 Almazeedi v Penner [2018] UKPC 3 Alterskye v Scott [1948] 1 All ER 469 Anonymous (1564) 2 Dyer 243b and 73 E.R. 538 Arab National Bank v El Sharif Saoud Bin Masoud Bin Haza'a El- Abdali [2004] EWHC 2381 (Comm) Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd v European Reinsurance Co of Zurich (Bermuda) [2003] UKPC 11; [2003] 1WLR 1041 (on appeal from Bermuda) ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm); [2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 122 Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Attorney General for Gibraltar v May [1999] 1 WLR 998 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Limited [2001] 208 CLR 199 Avril v Boultby [2008] 5 WLUK 324 Bank of Crete SA v Koskotas (No 2) [1992] 1 WLR 919 Bank Mellat v GAA Development and Construction Co [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 44 Beale v Thompson (1803) 3 Bosanquet and Puller 405 127 E.R. 221 Beckett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG [2005] 3 SLR 39 Berkshire Senior Citizens Housing Association Ltd v McCarthy E Fitt Ltd [1979] 15 BLR 32 Beumer Group UK Ltd v Vinci Construction UK Ltd [2017] BLR 53 Bibby Bulk Carriers Ltd v Cansulex Ltd [1989] QB 155 Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof Aschaffenburg AG [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 11 Bruce (W) Ltd v J Strong [1951] 2 KB 447; [1951] 1 All ER 1021, CA Bradley v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd [1989] AC 957 Callery v Gray [2001] EWCA Civ 1117 Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 618 Campbell v MNG Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 Carey & Browne v Henderson & Liddle [1920] 2 L1 L Rep. 479 Carter v Boehm (1766) 3 Burr 1905 Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 Ceval Alimentos SA v Agrimpex Trading Co Ltd [1995] 2 Lloyd's Rep 380 Chartered Institute of Arbitrators v B, C, D [2019] EWHC 460 (Comm) Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 Cofely Ltd v Bingham [2016] EWHC 240 (Comm) Cook and Songate’s Case (1588) 4 Leon 31 Crest Homes Plc v Marks [1987] A.C. 829 Dadourian Group (DGI) International Inc. v Simms [2004] EWCA Civ 686, unreported Deloitte & Touche LLP v Dickson [2005] EWHC 721 (Ch) Department of Economics, Policy and Development of the City of Moscow v Bankers Trust Co [2003] EWHC 1377 (Comm); [2003] 1 WLR 2885 Department of Economics, Policy and Development of the City of Moscow v Bankers Trust Co vi [2004] EWCA Civ 314; [2005] QB 207 Dera Commercial Estate v Derya Inc (The Sur) [2019] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 5 Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex parte B [1996] AC 487 Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon The Times 20 October 1988 Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd [1975] QB 613; [1974] 7 WLUK 157 Dolling-Baker v Merrett [1990] 1 WLR 1205 Douglas v Hello! (No 3) [2006] QB 125 Drake Insurance plc v Provident Insurance plc [2004] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 268 Duke of Queensberry v Shebbeare [1758] 2 Eden 329; 28 ER 924 Dunford & Elliot Ltd v Johnson and Firth Brown Ltd [1978] FSR 143 EMI Record Ltd v Spillane [1986] 1 WLR 967 Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 184; [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 616 Elissar, The [1984] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 207 Esterhuysen v Lonrho plc The Times, 29 May 1989 Eurocom v Siemens [2014] EWHC 3710 (TCC) Exp Young, In Re Kitchin [1881] 17 Ch D 668 Finelvet A.g. v Vinava Shipping Co Ltd (The Chrysalis) [1983] 1 WLR 1469 George Moundreas and Co SA v Navimpex Centrala Navala [1985] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 515 Gerald Metals SA v The Trustees of the Timis Trust and others [2016] EWHC 2327 Gillies v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2006] 1 WLR 781 Glidepath Holding BV v Thompson
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 3 April 2021 Article 5 4-2021 Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Christian R. Burset, Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 621 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Advisory Opinions and the Problem of Legal Authority Christian R. Burset* The prohibition against advisory opinions is fundamental to our understanding of federal judicial power, but we have misunderstood its origins. Discussions of the doctrine begin not with a constitutional text or even a court case, but a letter in which the Jay Court rejected President Washington’s request for legal advice. Courts and scholars have offered a variety of explanations for the Jay Court’s behavior. But they all depict the earliest Justices as responding to uniquely American concerns about advisory opinions. This Article offers a different explanation. Drawing on previously untapped archival sources, it shows that judges throughout the anglophone world—not only in the United States but also in England and British India— became opposed to advisory opinions in the second half of the eighteenth century. The death of advisory opinions was a global phenomenon, rooted in a period of anxiety about common-law authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Providence Island Company on 28Th September 1629 Letters Of
    The Providence Island Company On 28th September 1629 letters of marque were issued for an expedition to be mounted to St Catalina, an island in the Caribbean (later to be renamed Providence Island). Subscriptions were invited from Lord Saye's circle of powerful political and business friends, who were opposed to the arbitrary rule of the king, for twenty shares at £200 per head. In the summer of 1630 the first meeting of shareholders was held in Brooke House, Holborn, London (held there to avoid the plague in the country). On 4th December a patent was sealed granting the formal incorporation of the splendidly named company of 'The Governor and Company of Adventurers of the City of Westminster for the Plantation of the Islands of Providence, Henrietta and adjacent islands laying upon the coast of America'; known as 'The Providence Island Company'. The total cost of the Patent and fees was £60. The name Providence had great significance at that time; the Adventurers (men who advanced venture capital) believed they were responding to divine will in founding the settlement. They were casting themselves on God's providence. The project could only succeed with God's approval.4 St Catalina, as the Spanish called the island, was situated in the south-west corner of the Caribbean, off the coast of Nicaragua; it is six miles long by four wide and was considered, in the seventeenth century, to be the choicest of the Caribbean islands. It had an equable climate, was fertile and salubrious; with plenty of water. It was easily fortified and there were no venomous creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • I the Committee of Safety
    .· (~. ll II Ii ) ' THE COMMITTEE OF SAFETY. 11 "A thesis submitted to the ,, faculty of the Graduate School of the University of • Minnesota by Etheleen Frances ;emp in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ii degree of Master of Arts, May 5, 1911. 1;1 I Ii II Ii 11 ' :S I:BLI OGRAPHY. l. Source Material 1. Journals of the House of Lords, vol. V and VI. Journals of the House of Commons, vol. II and III. These contain the greater portion of the material on the Committee of Safety. 2. Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts. London, 1874 etc. These volumes contain here and there a com­ munication to or from the Committee of Safety but have much less material that might be expected. References found:- 4th Report p 262. 5th Report pp. 48, 54, 56, 63, 65, 69, 80, 107, 114. 7th Report pp. 550-588. 10th Report App. 6 pp. 87-88. 13th Report App. 1 p. 104. 3. Calendar of State Papers. Domestic 1641-1644 London, 1887-8 lla.ny order for military supplies are given in the State Papers but not in full. 4. Rushworth,John, Historical collections, 8 vol. London, 1682-1701. Compilation of declarations and proclamations. Vol. 3 and 7 contain material on the Committee. They contain valuable proclamations of the King which cannot be found elsewhere. 5. Somers, Lord. Tracts, 13 vol. London, 1809-1815. Has several remonstrances of value. ){) 1 ~ ( ' ,.... 6. Whitacre. Diary Add. M S S 31, 116, fol. Had notes from first six months of the Committee period especially.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION This volume publishes the papers and correspondence of the Hotham family during the civil wars and interregnum. The head of the family and first baronet, Sir John Hotham, is well known in the national narrative because of his critical role in denying the king entry to Hull on 23 April 1642. This episode ignited much contemporary controversy, raising the stakes in a pamphlet war between the king and his parliamentary opponents, and making armed conflict far more likely. It has attracted considerable attention from constitutional historians who have debated its legal ramifications, while political and military historians have recognized that the king’s failure to seize the large arms magazine at Hull badly undermined the royalist war effort. Yet, despite their national importance in 1642, the Hotham family’s papers have only rarely been utilized by academics. Late twentieth-century historians such as J.T. Cliffe, Barbara English, and Peter Roebuck drew upon the collection to inform their work on the wider theme of Yorkshire gentry landowners,1 but few others have been to Hull to access the archive. This also reflects a relative neglect of northern England in civil war historiography. There has been no biography of either of the Hothams, and their most recent family histories date from as long ago as the First World War. 2 This is unfortunate, because Sir John Hotham and his eldest son were extremely colourful and enigmatic figures, whose letters reveal much about the cultural attitudes of the English gentry in the 1640s. This volume seeks to redress this imbalance and restore the centrality of the Hotham family to the parliamentary cause.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BROUGHTON PLOTTERS, (The Providence !Island Company and Saybrook)
    BUSINESS AND TREASON: THE BROUGHTON PLOTTERS, (The Providence !Island Company and Saybrook) Nicholas J. Allen My deare wife, I am verylye persuaded God will bring some heavye affliction upon this lande, and that speedylye ... if the Lord seeth it will be good for us, he will provide shelter and a hiding place for us and others. ' John Winthrop, Governor of Saybrook, 1635 (in a letter to his wife dated 1629). Introduction Visitors to Broughton Castle, after viewing the rooms used by generations of the Fiennes family for living and socialising, make their way to, or if guided are shewn, the Council Chamber which is at the back and very top of the house. There they will very likely be told, or read in the guide book, that this room is where William Fiennes, eighth Lord Saye and Sele, his son Nathaniel and a group of like-minded men such as Lord Brooke, John Hampden, John Pym, Oliver St John, Lord Warwick and Sir Harry Vane planned their opposition to King Charles' government. The visitor will, very likely, be also told that they used a business venture in the Caribbean, namely the Providence Island Company, as a cover for these political meetings. So why did a group of powerful peers, landed gentry, politicians and businessmen meet, over what seems to be many years, plotting some form of opposition to the King's government — an exceedingly dangerous pastime. The number of men involved and the many meeting places used must have created some major problems of security, and not necessarily stemming from just the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln University Herald
    jt Lincoln University Herald. ~ 0 VOL.XIX. LINCOLNUNIVERSIW, PA., DECEMBER,I~I+JANUARY, 1915. No. I. d - Before going to Philadelphia, Dr. Boulden was pastor of churches in West Chester, Pa. ; r in Newark and Milton, Del. e In a private letter, he says: “My success has L, been due to my training in Lincoln University, and I have red,edicated my life to the church of my choice, the Union American M. E., and to my people.’’ -- New Buildings Needed. 1 To meet the demands of the finies and the > growth in numbers of the student body, two additional buildings are greatly needed on the c campus. A Science EIall, with modern equip- f ment, is needed to meet the needs of the Y growing number of students in this depart- V ment and the increased requirements of the 1 medical schools. The present development of the Scientific Department makes the present 1 facilities entirely inadequate. A combined Y. M. C. A. Building and t .Gymnasium has long been needed to supply r a centre for the social and religious activities t of the students, and to provide the means for , healthful exercise and physical recreation, t especially during the winter months. Lincoln , University looks to her generous friends to S Bishop P. A: Boulden, D. D. s~~pplythese needs and to provide the means 1 for further expansion and usefulness. Speaking of the recent election of Rev. P. , A. Boulden, D. D., to the Bishopric of the -- Union American M. E. Church, a Philadclphia Campus Items. paper says: “Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Williams, Richard Title: County and municipal government in Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Somerset 1649- 1660. General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT IN CORNWALL, DEVON, DORSET AND SOMERSET 1649-1660 by RICHARD WILLIAMS xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A THESIS Submitted to the University of Bristol for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1981 XXXXXXX*1XXXXXXXXXXX County and Municipal Government in Cornwall, Devon, Dorset and Somerset 1649-1660.
    [Show full text]
  • ALRC 33 Civil Admiralty Jurisdiction Terms of Reference
    ALRC 33 Civil Admiralty Jurisdiction Terms of Reference I, NEIL ANTHONY BROWN, the Minister of State for Communications, acting for and on behalf of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, HAVING REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING: (a) that the Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia is at present still exercised pursuant to the United Kingdom Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890; (b) that the Constitution enables the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws conferring jurisdiction on the High Court and other federal courts in matters of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and to make laws investing any court of a State or Territory with such jurisdiction; and (c) the other countries, including Canada and New Zealand, to which the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 previously applied, have enacted their own Admiralty legislation in a revised and updated form; HEREBY REFER to the Law Reform Commission, for INQUIRY, REVIEW and REPORT thereon to the Attorney-General, all aspects of the Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia, and REQUEST the Law Reform Commission, in considering this reference, (a) to have regard to the Report of the Joint Committee of the Law Council of Australia and the Maritime Law Association of Australia and New Zealand dated 22 April 1982 on Admiralty Jurisdiction in Australia, and (b) to take note of the draft Admiralty Jurisdiction Bill set out as Appendix “A” to that Report, and, in particular, to (i) make recommendations on the provisions to be included in an Australian Admiralty Act; (ii) consider whether any, and
    [Show full text]
  • ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRAN
    Click here for Explanatory Memorandum ———————— Number 28 of 2007 ———————— STATUTE LAW REVISION ACT 2007 ———————— ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 2. General statute law revision repeal and saver. 3. Specific repeals. 4. Assignment of short titles. 5. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1896. 6. Amendment of Short Titles Act 1962. 7. Miscellaneous amendments to post-1800 short titles. 8. Evidence of certain early statutes, etc. 9. Savings. 10. Short title and collective citation. SCHEDULE 1 Statutes retained PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 1 [No. 28.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [2007.] SCHEDULE 2 Statutes Specifically Repealed PART 1 Pre-Union Irish Statutes 1169 to 1800 PART 2 Statutes of England 1066 to 1706 PART 3 Statutes of Great Britain 1707 to 1800 PART 4 Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 1801 to 1922 ———————— 2 [2007.]Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [No. 28.] Acts Referred to Bill of Rights 1688 1 Will. & Mary, sess. 2, c. 2 Documentary Evidence Act 1868 31 & 32 Vict., c. 37 Documentary Evidence Act 1882 45 & 46 Vict., c. 9 Dower Act 1297 25 Edw. 1, Magna Carta, c. 7 Drainage and Improvement of Lands Supplemental Act (Ireland) (No. 2) 1867 31 & 32 Vict., c. 3 Dublin Hospitals Regulation Act 1856 19 & 20 Vict., c. 110 Evidence Act 1845 8 & 9 Vict., c. 113 Forfeiture Act 1639 15 Chas.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Phd Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners
    Olokotor, Prince Ndudi Councillor (2017) Judicial attitudes to enforcement of transnational awards under the New York convention : a critical assessment of the English and Nigerian courts. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/24950 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this PhD Thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This PhD Thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this PhD Thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the PhD Thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full PhD Thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD PhD Thesis, pagination. JUDICIAL ATTITUDES TO ENFORCEMENT OF TRANSNATIONAL AWARDS UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ENGLISH AND NIGERIAN COURTS Prince Ndudi Councillor Olokotor Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Law September 2016 School of Law SOAS, University of London Declaration I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the SOAS, University of London concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Act 1996 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 15 April 2019
    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: Arbitration Act 1996 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 15 April 2019. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for connected purposes. [17th June 1996] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Annotations: Extent Information E1 This Act extends to England, Wales and Northern Ireland; for exceptions see s.108 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act modified (11.11.1999) by 1999 c. 31, s. 8(1)(2) (with application as mentioned in s. 10(2)(3)) C2 Act excluded (31.1.1997) by 1966 c. 41, s. 3 (as substituted by 1996 c. 23, s. 107(1), Sch. 3 para. 24 (with s. 81(2)); S.I. 1996/3146, art. 3 (with transitional provisions in art. 4, Sch. 2) Act excluded (1.8.1998) by 1992 c. 52, s. 212A(6) (as inserted (1.8.1998) by 1998 c. 8, s. 7; S.I.
    [Show full text]