Inside the Great Wall Street Money Dynasties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inside the Great Wall Street Money Dynasties THE LAST PARTNERSHIPS This page intentionally left blank. THE LAST PARTNERSHIPS Inside the Great Wall Street Money Dynasties Charles R. Geisst McGraw-Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto McGraw-Hill abc Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data- base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 0-07-138261-5 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: 0-07-136999-6. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales pro- motions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please contact George Hoare, Special Sales, at [email protected] or (212) 904-4069. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill’s prior consent. You may use the work for your own noncommercial and personal use; any other use of the work is strictly prohibited. Your right to use the work may be terminated if you fail to comply with these terms. THE WORK IS PROVIDED “AS IS”. McGRAW-HILL AND ITS LICENSORS MAKE NO GUAR- ANTEES OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY OR COMPLETENESS OF OR RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED FROM USING THE WORK, INCLUDING ANY INFORMA- TION THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE WORK VIA HYPERLINK OR OTHERWISE, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. McGraw-Hill and its licensors do not warrant or guarantee that the func- tions contained in the work will meet your requirements or that its operation will be uninterrupted or error free. Neither McGraw-Hill nor its licensors shall be liable to you or anyone else for any inac- curacy, error or omission, regardless of cause, in the work or for any damages resulting therefrom. McGraw-Hill has no responsibility for the content of any information accessed through the work. Under no circumstances shall McGraw-Hill and/or its licensors be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, punitive, consequential or similar damages that result from the use of or inability to use the work, even if any of them has been advised of the possibility of such damages. This limitation of lia- bility shall apply to any claim or cause whatsoever whether such claim or cause arises in contract, tort or otherwise. DOI: 10.1036/0071382615 For Margaret & Meg This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix TIMELINE xi INTRODUCTION 1 1 The Yankee Banking Houses: Clark Dodge and Jay Cooke 9 2 “Our Crowd”: The Seligmans, Lehman Brothers, and Kuhn Loeb 40 3 White Shoes and Racehorses: Brown Brothers Harriman and August Belmont 81 4 Crashed and Absorbed: Kidder Peabody and Dillon Read 114 5 Corner of Broad and Wall: J. P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley 157 6 Corner of Wall and Main: Merrill Lynch and E. F. Hutton 209 7 Unraveled by Greed: Salomon Brothers and Drexel Burnham 240 8 The Last Holdouts: Goldman Sachs and Lazard Freres 282 CONCLUSION 314 NOTES 317 BIBLIOGRAPHY 325 INDEX 329 vii Copyright 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click Here for Terms of Use. This page intentionally left blank. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the following, all of whom helped contribute information not found in the usual sources: Victor Grey of the Rothschild Archive in London; Meg Ventrudo of the Museum of American Financial History in New York; Steve Wheeler, archivist at the New York Stock Exchange; and the staff of the Georgetown University Library special collections department. Kelli Christiansen of McGraw-Hill was instrumental in helping keep the narrative on track and helped oversee the book process from beginning to end. My wife, Margaret, deserves special thanks for her extraordinary patience while the book was being written. ix Copyright 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click Here for Terms of Use. This page intentionally left blank. TIMELINE 1818 John A. Brown & Co. founded 1832 Vermilye & Co. founded 1836 S. & M. Allen & Co. (founded 1808) fails 1836 Enoch Clark founds Clark Dodge & Co. 1837 August Belmont & Co. founded (dissolved in 1924) 1838 Drexel & Co. founded 1848 Lazard Freres founded (continues today) 1858 Lehman Brothers founded 1861 Jay Cooke leaves Clark Dodge & Co. to found Jay Cooke & Co. 1864 J. & W. Seligman founded 1864 George Peabody & Co. becomes J. S. Morgan & Co. 1867 Kuhn Loeb founded 1869 Goldman Sachs & Co. founded 1871 Drexel & Co. merges with J. S. Morgan & Co. to become Drexel, Morgan & Co. 1873 Jay Cooke & Co. fails 1873 Jay Cooke’s son-in-law reestablishes firm as Charles D. Barney & Co. 1894 J. S. Morgan & Co. becomes J. P. Morgan & Co. 1903 E. F. Hutton founded 1905 Vermilye & Co. becomes William Read & Co. 1910 Salomon Brothers founded 1914 Merrill Lynch founded 1920 William Read & Co. becomes Dillon Read 1930 Brown Brothers merges with Harriman family interests to become Brown Brothers Harriman (continues today) xi Copyright 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click Here for Terms of Use. Timeline 1934 Drexel, Morgan & Co. reverts to its original name, Drexel & Co. 1934 J. P. Morgan & Co. spins off Morgan Stanley (J. P. Morgan continues today) 1937 Charles D. Barney acquires Edward B. Smith & Co. to form Smith Barney & Co. 1966 Drexel & Co. acquires Harriman Ripley & Co. to become Drexel Harriman Ripley 1970 Drexel Harriman Ripley becomes Drexel Firestone 1971 Drexel Firestone merges with Burnham & Co. to become Drexel Burnham 1974 Kidder Peabody acquires Clark Dodge & Co. 1976 Drexel Burnham merges with William D. Witter and acquires the name of a major investor in Witter to become Drexel Burnham Lambert 1981 Salomon Brothers merges with Phibro to become Phibro-Salomon (becomes Salomon Brothers again in 1985) 1984 Shearson American Express acquires Lehman Brothers 1987 E. F. Hutton bought by Shearson 1990 Drexel Burnham Lambert files for bankruptcy 1994 Shearson American Express divests Lehman Brothers, which continues today as Lehman Brothers 1997 Smith Barney merges with Salomon Brothers to become Salomon Smith Barney, today a unit of Citigroup 1997 Bankers Trust & Co. acquires Alex. Brown & Co. 1997 Dillon Read acquired by Swiss Bank Corp. 1997 Morgan Stanley merges with Dean Witter to become Morgan Stanley Dean Witter 1997 Alex. Brown acquired by Bankers Trust. Continues today as unit of Deutsche Bank 1999 Goldman Sachs sells initial public offering xii THE LAST PARTNERSHIPS This page intentionally left blank. INTRODUCTION FOR MORE THAN 150 years, their names were synonymous with Wall Street. The most successful be- came the subjects of folklore, envy, and political vilification, and noto- rious symbols of wealth and power. No longer household names today, in the nineteenth century many had barroom songs and jingles writ- ten about them. Before there were sports stars and pop musicians dominating the news, they were among the first true celebrities in the country. They were, of course, the famous names behind the great Wall Street partnerships. Some became extremely well known, while others preferred to remain behind the scenes and tend to business without attracting much attention. Their heyday was from the War of 1812 to the end of World War II, when most Wall Street securities firms were still organized as partnerships. A roll call sounds much like the social register of New York, where most made their livings. Without their business success, many of the country’s cultural institutions would probably not have developed as significantly as they did. The Metro- politan Opera, Metropolitan Museum of Art, and many of the other significant cultural and educational institutions benefited from their partners’ largesse over the years. The names on the buildings of many college campuses read like a Who’s Who of banking, especially those names famous before World War II. The rise of the famous Wall Street banking dynasties is a testimony to the rags-to-riches stories of the nineteenth century. A young immi- grant came to the United States from Northern Europe and set up his own humble business, usually peddling sundries door-to-door around 1 Copyright 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Click Here for Terms of Use. THE LAST PARTNERSHIPS the South or Midwest. Within several years, he graduated to the dry goods business and was quickly opening stores in different states before gravitating to New York. In another few years, he and mem- bers of his family were in the banking business, financing bills of exchange and trading stocks and bonds. In twenty to thirty years, his firm was one of Wall Street’s elite.
Recommended publications
  • Historic Lower Manhattan
    Historic Lower Manhattan To many people Lower Manhattan means financial district, where the large buildings are designed to facilitate the exchange of money. The buildings, streets and open spaces, however, recall events that gave birth to a nation and have helped shape the destiny of western civilization. Places such as St. Paul's Chapel and Federal Hall National Memorial exemplify a number of sites which have been awarded special status by the Federal Government. The sites appearing in this guide are included in the following programs which have given them public recognition and helped to assure their survival. National Park Service Since its inauguration in 1916, the National Park Service has been dedicated to the preservation and management of our country's unique national, historical and recreational areas. The first national park in the world—Yellowstone—has been followed by the addition of over 300 sites in the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. National Park areas near and in Manhattan are: Theodore Roosevelt Birthplace National Historic Site, Fire Island National Seashore, Gateway National Recreation Area, Sagamore Hill National Historic Site, Hamilton Grange National Memorial, and General Grant National Memorial. National Historic Landmarks National Park Service historians study and evaluate historic properties throughout the country. Acting upon their findings the Secretary of the Interior may declare the properties eligible for designation as National National Parks are staffed by Park Rangers who can provide information As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Historic Landmarks. The owner of such a property is offered a certif­ to facilitate your visit to Lower Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • New York CITY
    New York CITY the 123rd Annual Meeting American Historical Association NONPROFIT ORG. 400 A Street, S.E. U.S. Postage Washington, D.C. 20003-3889 PAID WALDORF, MD PERMIT No. 56 ASHGATENew History Titles from Ashgate Publishing… The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir The Long Morning of Medieval Europe for the Crusading Period New Directions in Early Medieval Studies Edited by Jennifer R. Davis, California Institute from al-Kamil fi’l-Ta’rikh. Part 3 of Technology and Michael McCormick, The Years 589–629/1193–1231: The Ayyubids Harvard University after Saladin and the Mongol Menace Includes 25 b&w illustrations Translated by D.S. Richards, University of Oxford, UK June 2008. 366 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6254-9 Crusade Texts in Translation: 17 June 2008. 344 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-4079-0 The Art, Science, and Technology of Medieval Travel The Portfolio of Villard de Honnecourt Edited by Robert Bork, University of Iowa (Paris, Bibliothèque nationale and Andrea Kann AVISTA Studies in the History de France, MS Fr 19093) of Medieval Technology, Science and Art: 6 A New Critical Edition and Color Facsimile Includes 23 b&w illustrations with a glossary by Stacey L. Hahn October 2008. 240 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-6307-2 Carl F. Barnes, Jr., Oakland University Includes 72 color and 48 b&w illustrations November 2008. 350 pages. Hbk. 978-0-7546-5102-4 The Medieval Account Books of the Mercers of London Patents, Pictures and Patronage An Edition and Translation John Day and the Tudor Book Trade Lisa Jefferson Elizabeth Evenden, Newnham College, November 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Segelke & Rascal Top Beef Empire Days
    JUNE 10, 2014 Volume 8: Issue 23 In this issue... • Barrel Racing Babies, pg 11 • Nutralix Barrel Daze, pg 13 • Lucky Dog Productions, pg 17 • ID Barrel Futurity, pg 24 fast horses, fast news • MN Futurity & Maturity, pg 26 Published Weekly Online at www.BarrelRacingReport.com - Since 2007 Segelke & Rascal Top Beef Empire Days By Tanya Randall The full slate of summer rodeos is well underway with multiple FI R ST DOWN DAS H high-paying rodeos available across the country. Paxton Segelke and AS H A A M E D T F SI 105 HPQ Smokin Rascal picked up the largest check offered this past SI 113 weekend when they topped the $4,600-added Beef Empire Days, SUDDEN FA M E June 5-7, in Garden City, Kansas. UNA FR IO CE R VEZA SI 98 Segelke, Synder, Colo., collected $2,438 of the $12,192 total purse for TWAYNAS DAS H her run of 17.06 in the rodeo’s first performance on Thursday night. TWAS SP EEDIN G SI 106 “I couldn’t fault it anywhere,” said Segelke, 20, of her run. “Ras- SI 108 cal has been working outstanding here lately. It was pretty fun.” DEANS SP EED CU rr ENT She originally drew fourth position, but with turnouts, moved up HPQ SM OKIN RASCAL to second on the ground. Thanks to all the rain the night before 2006 PALO M INO GELDIN G and proper planning by the rodeo committee, the footing was safe FOL ’S NATIVE and fast. FOLS SM OKE “It had rained quite a bit before slack the night before, but that SI 104 committee worked the ground really well,” she said.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York Real Estate Finance Bureau ------X
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK REAL ESTATE FINANCE BUREAU --------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Investigation by ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York, of AOD No. 15-240 15 BROAD STREET, LLC; 15 BROAD STREET MANAGERS, LLC; 20 PINE STREET, LLC; 20 PINE STREET MANAGERS, LLC; 85 ADAMS STREET, LLC; AND 85 ADAMS STREET MANAGERS, LLC; AI PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENTS (USA) CORP.; and AI HOLDINGS (USA) CORP., Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------X ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE Pursuant to the Martin Act, New York General Business Law (“GBL”) § 352 et seq., and New York Executive Law (“Executive Law”) § 63(12), ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York (the “NYAG”) investigated the conduct of 15 Broad Street, LLC; 15 Broad Street Managers, LLC; 20 Pine Street, LLC; 20 Pine Street Managers, LLC; 85 Adams Street, LLC; and 85 Adams Street Managers, LLC; AI Properties and Developments (USA) Corp.; and AI Holdings (USA) Corp. (collectively “Respondents”), in connection with an offering of real estate securities in New York State. This Assurance of Discontinuance (“Assurance”) contains the findings of the NYAG’s investigation and the relief agreed to by the NYAG and Respondents. FINDINGS I. The Respondents 1. Respondent 15 Broad Street, LLC (“15 Broad”), a Delaware limited liability company, is the named sponsor of an offering of condominiums located at 15 Broad Street in Manhattan. 2. Respondent 15 Broad Managers, LLC (“15 Broad Managers”), a Delaware limited liability company, is the sole member of 15 Broad. 3. Respondent 20 Pine Street LLC (“20 Pine”), a Delaware limited liability company, is the named sponsor of an offering of condominiums located at 20 Pine Street in Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986
    Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Steven T. Wills June 2012 © 2012 Steven T. Wills. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwtaer Nichols Act of 1986 by STEVEN T. WILLS has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Ingo Traushweizer Assistant Professor of History Howard Dewald Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WILLS, STEVEN T., M.A., June 2012, History Navy and Marine Corps Opposition to the Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 Director of Thesis: Ingo Traushweizer The Goldwater Nichols Act of 1986 was the most comprehensive defense reorganization legislation in a generation. It has governed the way the United States has organized, planned, and conducted military operations for the last twenty five years. It passed the Senate and House of Representatives with margins of victory reserved for birthday and holiday resolutions. It is praised throughout the U.S. defense establishment as a universal good. Despite this, it engendered a strong opposition movement organized primarily by Navy Secretary John F. Lehman but also included members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, prominent Senators and Congressman, and President Reagan's Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger. This essay will examine the forty year background of defense reform movements leading to the Goldwater Nichols Act, the fight from 1982 to 1986 by supporters and opponents of the proposed legislation and its twenty-five year legacy that may not be as positive as the claims made by the Department of Defense suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freeman 1999
    Ideas On Liberty July 1999 Vol. 49, No.7 I 8 THOUGHTS on FREEDOM-Outside the Limits by Donald J. Boudreaux 8 Immoral, Unconstitutional War by David N Mayer 1 12 The Kosovo Tangle by Gary Dempsey 16 Remembering and Inventing: A Short History of the Balkans by Peter Mentzel 21 POTOMAC PRINCIPLES-Warmongering for Peace by Doug Bandow 23 Isolationism by Frank Chodorov 26 How War Amplified Federal Power in the Twentieth Century by Robert Higgs 30 Another Place, Another War by Michael Palmer 32 War's Other Casualty by Wendy McElroy 137 Spontaneous Order by Nigel Ashford 43 Storm Trooping to Equality by James Bovard 48 Croaking Frogs by Brian Doherty 81 Noah Smithwick: Pioneer Texan and Monetary Critic by Joseph R. Stromberg 38 IDEAS and CONSEQUENCES-Clinton versus Cleveland and Coolidge on Taxes by Lawrence W. Reed 41 THE THERAPEUTIC STATE-Suicide as a Moral Issue by Thomas Szasz 148 ECONOMIC NOTIONS-In the Absence ofPrivate Property Rights by Dwight R. Lee 54 ECONOMICS on TRIAL-Dismal Scientists Score Another Win by Mark Skousen 63 THE PURSUIT of HAPPINESS-Ignorance Is Bliss-Maybe by Walter Williams 2 Perspective-Operation Legacy by Sheldon Richman 4 Tax Cuts Are Unfair? It Just Ain't So! by David Kelley 58 Book Reviews Overcoming Welfare: Expecting More from the Poor and Ourselves by James L. Payne, reviewed by Robert Batemarco; Coolidge: An American Enigma by Robert Sobel and The Presidency of Calvin Coolidge by Robert Ferrell, reviewed by Raymond 1. Keating; H. L. Mencken Revisited by William H. A. Williams, reviewed by George C.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES A. BAKER, III the Case for Pragmatic Idealism Is Based on an Optimis- Tic View of Man, Tempered by Our Knowledge of Human Imperfection
    Extract from Raising the Bar: The Crucial Role of the Lawyer in Society, by Talmage Boston. © State Bar of Texas 2012. Available to order at texasbarbooks.net. TWO MOST IMPORTANT LAWYERS OF THE LAST FIFTY YEARS 67 concluded his Watergate memoirs, The Right and the Power, with these words that summarize his ultimate triumph in “raising the bar”: From Watergate we learned what generations before us have known: our Constitution works. And during the Watergate years it was interpreted again so as to reaffirm that no one—absolutely no one—is above the law.29 JAMES A. BAKER, III The case for pragmatic idealism is based on an optimis- tic view of man, tempered by our knowledge of human imperfection. It promises no easy answers or quick fixes. But I am convinced that it offers our surest guide and best hope for navigating our great country safely through this precarious period of opportunity and risk in world affairs.30 In their historic careers, Leon Jaworski and James A. Baker, III, ended up in the same place—the highest level of achievement in their respective fields as lawyers—though they didn’t start from the same place. Leonidas Jaworski entered the world in 1905 as the son of Joseph Jaworski, a German-speaking Polish immigrant, who went through Ellis Island two years before Leon’s birth and made a modest living as an evangelical pastor leading small churches in Central Texas towns. James A. Baker, III, entered the world in 1930 as the son, grand- son, and great-grandson of distinguished lawyers all named James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturing Philanthropy GSDM’S Philanthropic Culture Is in Place, and the Potential Is Unlimited
    Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine impressions Culturing Philanthropy GSDM’S philanthropic culture is in place, and the potential is unlimited. Quoted “ Our 50th anniversary CONTENTS lets us reflect upon Fall 2012 the journey thus 30 far—and take a look at our future.” — Dean Jeffrey W. Hutter A pacesetter Dean’s Message | page 2 from Venezuela Ernesto Muller PERIO 61 thinks that lessons in philanthropy should be part of every dental student’s education. 32 SECTIONS 3 White Coat Tradition Continues • The Mental Blocks Play BU • Group Practice Coming Soon • Dr. Dulong on BORID • Dr. Kaufman in New York Times • Every dollar counts 3 News in Brief Alums in the Military • PERIO Creates New Implant Professor Anita Gohel says, “You’re not System • Dr. Friedman as MDS President • Tri-School involved with GSDM for just four years. Symposium Breaks Record You belong to it for a lifetime.” 33 25 The Unstoppable Shaeffer Family • Liz Pinone Tackles Career Services • Dr. Chogle Leads 15 Spotlight Endodontics • Pamela Baldassarre DMD 82 PERIO 84 Giving back on Remembering BU • Metcalf Winners McManama through teaching and Chou • Commencement 2012 Recap Carl McManama believes teaching future dental educators is among the greatest ways to give. 50 34 Run DMD! Alums Sponsor Brunch • Deedee Gurin Alumni DMD 97 Grows Her Practice • Meet Diversity Director 41 Larry Dunham DMD 83 • Alumni Survey Results • On the Road with Kimberley • Class Notes Inspired by a mentor Paul Fugazzotto PERIO 81 pledged in honor of the late Gerald M. Kramer. 35 Fall 2012 IMPRESSIONS MANAGING EDITOR Francie King DESIGN PHONE 617-638-5147 A publication for the Jackie Rubin Boston University Owen Edwards Design FAX 617-638-4895 alumni and friends of Assistant Director of Development EMAIL [email protected] PHOTOGRAPHY Boston University Publications & Media Communications www.bu.edu/dental COMPREHENSIVE CAMPAIGN BU Photography Henry M.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern First Ladies: Their Documentary Legacy. INSTITUTION National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 412 562 CS 216 046 AUTHOR Smith, Nancy Kegan, Comp.; Ryan, Mary C., Comp. TITLE Modern First Ladies: Their Documentary Legacy. INSTITUTION National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-0-911333-73-8 PUB DATE 1989-00-00 NOTE 189p.; Foreword by Don W. Wilson (Archivist of the United States). Introduction and Afterword by Lewis L. Gould. Published for the National Archives Trust Fund Board. PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Archives; *Authors; *Females; Modern History; Presidents of the United States; Primary Sources; Resource Materials; Social History; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *First Ladies (United States); *Personal Writing; Public Records; Social Power; Twentieth Century; Womens History ABSTRACT This collection of essays about the Presidential wives of the 20th century through Nancy Reagan. An exploration of the records of first ladies will elicit diverse insights about the historical impact of these women in their times. Interpretive theories that explain modern first ladies are still tentative and exploratory. The contention in the essays, however, is that whatever direction historical writing on presidential wives may follow, there is little question that the future role of first ladies is more likely to expand than to recede to the days of relatively silent and passive helpmates. Following a foreword and an introduction, essays in the collection and their authors are, as follows: "Meeting a New Century: The Papers of Four Twentieth-Century First Ladies" (Mary M. Wolf skill); "Not One to Stay at Home: The Papers of Lou Henry Hoover" (Dale C.
    [Show full text]
  • And Early Twentieth Centuries
    A Broker's Duty of Best Execution in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Francis J. Facciolo' Introduction Although a broker-dealer's duty of best execution can now be located in federal common law, self-regulatory organization ("SRO") regulations, or state common law, the root of the doctrine is conventionally found in the third area, state law. In this view, the common law duty of best execution is a particular manifestation of a broker's more general duties as an agent to its customers.1 The duty of best execution may be broadly characterized as a fiduciary one, or as a2 limited duty, due with respect only to a particular purchase or sale. Even in jurisdictions where a broker is not a fiduciary, however, courts require brokers, as agents, to give best execution to their customers.3 One well known treatise has summarized the common law duty of best execution as consisting of three things: "the duty to execute promptly; the duty to execute in an appropriate market; and the duty to obtain the best price.'A Different types of customers put differing . Francis J. Facciolo is on the faculty of the St. John's University School of Law. The Author thanks Maria Boboris and David J. Grech for their research assistance; William H. Manz and the St. John's University School of Law library staff for their generous help in locating many obscure research materials; Dean Mary C. Daly for a summer research grant, which enabled me to start this article; and Professor James A. Fanto for his insightful comments on an earlier draft of this article that was presented at Pace Law School's Investor Rights Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Planning in World War II
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Rockoff, Hugh Working Paper The Paradox of Planning in World War II Working Paper, No. 1995-13 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, Rutgers University Suggested Citation: Rockoff, Hugh (1996) : The Paradox of Planning in World War II, Working Paper, No. 1995-13, Rutgers University, Department of Economics, New Brunswick, NJ This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/94307 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 95-13 April 1996 The Paradox of Planning in the United States during World War II* Hugh Rockoff Department of Economics Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ 08903-5055 908-932-7857 For Discussion Only I.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehman Brothers
    Lehman Brothers Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Pink Sheets: LEHMQ, former NYSE ticker symbol LEH) (pronounced / ˈliːm ə n/ ) was a global financial services firm which, until declaring bankruptcy in 2008, participated in business in investment banking, equity and fixed-income sales, research and trading, investment management, private equity, and private banking. It was a primary dealer in the U.S. Treasury securities market. Its primary subsidiaries included Lehman Brothers Inc., Neuberger Berman Inc., Aurora Loan Services, Inc., SIB Mortgage Corporation, Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Eagle Energy Partners, and the Crossroads Group. The firm's worldwide headquarters were in New York City, with regional headquarters in London and Tokyo, as well as offices located throughout the world. On September 15, 2008, the firm filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection following the massive exodus of most of its clients, drastic losses in its stock, and devaluation of its assets by credit rating agencies. The filing marked the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.[2] The following day, the British bank Barclays announced its agreement to purchase, subject to regulatory approval, Lehman's North American investment-banking and trading divisions along with its New York headquarters building.[3][4] On September 20, 2008, a revised version of that agreement was approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James M. Peck.[5] During the week of September 22, 2008, Nomura Holdings announced that it would acquire Lehman Brothers' franchise in the Asia Pacific region, including Japan, Hong Kong and Australia.[6] as well as, Lehman Brothers' investment banking and equities businesses in Europe and the Middle East.
    [Show full text]