A Review Investigation on Outdoor and Indoor Propagation Models
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews 1(1): 1-11, 2018; Article no.JMSRR.41658 A Review Investigation on Outdoor and Indoor Propagation Models V. O. A. Akpaida1, F. I. Anyasi1, S. I. Uzairue2*, A. I. Idim3 and O. Alashiri2 1Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. 2Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria. 3Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Petroleum Training Institute, Effurun Delta State, Nigeria. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author VOAA designed the study, performed the statistical analysis. Author SIU wrote the protocol and first draft of the manuscript. Authors FIA and AII managed the analyses of the study. Author OA managed the literature searches. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JMSRR/2018/41658 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Madogni Vianou Irenee, Departement de Physique, Laboratoire de Physique du Rayonnement LPR, Cotonou, Universite d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Benin. (2) Dr. Anjanapura V. Raghu. Professor, Department of Basic Science, Centre for Emerging Technology, Jain Global Campus, Jain University, India. (3) Dr. Suraya Hani Bt Adnan, Associate Professor, Department Civil Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Malaysia. Reviewers: (1) Vikram Puri, DuyTan University, Vietnam. (2) S. Sridhar, S. A. Engineering College, India. (3) Muhammad Faheem, Abdullah Gul University, Turkey. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/25560 Received 25th April 2018 Accepted 10th July 2018 Review Article th Published 14 July 2018 ABSTRACT Path loss exponent has turned out to be one of the key challenges that are been faced in the telecommunications sector both in Nigeria and other countries. There is a great need to take a critical look at the various mathematical methods and techniques that have been developed by many researchers of which are used in the calculation of signal loss in telecommunication industry. This article draws the conclusion that all the methods are accurate depending on the condition(s) or factors after reviewing over fifty (50) journals. It was therefore concluded that the method that is applied to a particular situation depends on the surrounding environments. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]; Akpiada et al.; JMSRR, 1(1): 1-11, 2018; Article no.JMSRR.41658 Keywords: Path loss; propagation; models; signal strength. 1. INTRODUCTION Path loss is typically communicated in dB. In its most straightforward shape, the path loss can be Path loss is the decrease in power density computed utilizing the equation. (attenuation) of an electromagnetic wave as it travels through space. Path loss is a noteworthy L = 10 n + C (1) part of the investigation and plan of the connection spending plan of a Where L is the path loss in decibels, n is the path telecommunication framework. The term is loss exponent, d is the separation between the generally utilized as a part of wireless transmitter and the receiver, normally estimated communication and signal spread. Path loss in meters, and C is a consistent which represent could be due to impacts such as: free-space framework losses. loss, absorption, reflection, diffraction, aperture- medium coupling loss and refraction. Path loss is The estimation of C typically fluctuates and is also affected by shapes, territory, condition ordinarily reliant on the kind of demonstrating (urban or provincial, vegetation and foliage), under thought. A rundown of run of the mill path spread medium (dry or wet air), the separation loss exponents acquired in different versatile between the transmitter and the receiver, and the situations has appeared in Table 1. stature and area of the antennas [1-5,6]. Path loss typically incorporates propagation losses Table 1. Path Loss Exponents for Different caused by the regular development of the radio Environments [11,12,13,14,15] wave front in free space, absorption losses (aka infiltration losses), when the signal goes through Environment Path loss media not straightforward to electromagnetic exponent, n waves, diffraction losses when part of the radio Free space 2 wave front is discouraged by a hazy deterrent, Urban area cellular radio 2.7 to 3.5 and losses caused by other wonders [7,8,9,6]. Shadowed urban cellular radio 3 to 5 In building line-of-sight 1.6 to 1.8 The multipath effect is a process in which a Obstructed in building 4 to 6 signal emanated by a transmitter may travel Obstructed in factories 2 to 3 along a wide range of paths to a receiver concurrently. Multipath waves join at the receiver 2. PATH LOSS PREDICTION antenna, bringing about a resulting signal that TECHNIQUES may fluctuate generally, contingent upon the circulation of the force and relative engendering The process of calculating the path loss is time of the waves and bandwidth of the usually called prediction. Exact prediction is transmitted signal. The aggregate power of plausible only for less complex cases, such as meddling waves in a Rayleigh fading situation the previously mentioned free space propagation differs rapidly as a component of space (which is or the flat-earth model. In practical cases the known as a small-scale fading). Small-scale path loss is calculated by using a number of fading alludes to the fast changes in radio signal approximations. Statistical methods (likewise abundancy in a brief timeframe or travel separate called stochastic or empirical) depend on [10] estimated and arrived at the midpoint of losses along typical classes of radio connections. Some 1.1 Path Loss Experiment of the most commonly utilized methods are Hata, Okumura-Hata, the COST Hata model, In wireless communication studies, path loss is W.C.Y.Lee etc. which are otherwise known as spoken to by the path loss exponent, whose radio wave propagation models and are typically esteem is regularly in the scope of 2 to 4, where 2 utilized as a part of the plan of cellular networks is for propagation in free space, 4 is for and public land versatile networks (PLMN). The moderately lossy conditions and for the instance Okumura-Hata as refined by the COST-231 of full specular reflection from the earth surface project is the method employed for wireless alluded to as the level earth display. In a few communications in the very high frequency conditions, the path loss exponent can achieve (VHF) and ultra-high frequency (UHF) frequency values in the scope of 4 to 6. Then again, a band (the bands utilized by walkie-talkies, police, passage may go about as a waveguide, bringing maneuvers and cellular telephones). For FM about a path loss exponent under 2. radio and the TV broadcasting, the path loss is 2 Akpiada et al.; JMSRR, 1(1): 1-11, 2018; Article no.JMSRR.41658 most commonly predicted utilizing the ITU model extraordinary for a similar distance along two as described in ITU-R P.1546 recommendation. unique paths and it can be distinctive even along Other well-known models are those of Walfisch- a similar path if estimated at various Ikegami, W.C.Y Lee, and Erceg. circumstances. Ray tracing is one of the deterministic methods in In radio wave condition for versatile antennas is view of the physical laws of wave propagation close to the ground. Viewable pathway that are additionally utilized as they are expected propagation (LOS) models are highly altered. to produce more accurate and solid predictions The signal path from the BTS antenna normally of the path loss than the empirical methods but raised over the rooftop tops is refracted down are considerably more costly in computational into the local physical condition (slopes, trees, exertion and rely upon the definite and accurate houses) and the LOS signal only here and there description of all objects in the propagation reaches the antenna. Nature will produce a few space, such as structures, rooftops, windows, deflections of the direct signal unto the antenna, entryways and walls. They are therefore where typically 2-5 deflected signal components employed predominantly for short propagation will be vectorially included. These refraction and paths. Among the most commonly employed deflection processes cause loss of signal methods in the plan of radio gear such as strength, which changes when the versatile antennas and bolsters is the limited difference antenna moves (Raleigh fading), causing quick time-space strategy. varieties of up to 20 db. The network is therefore intended to give an excess of signal strength Comparable methods are employed in predicting compared to LOS of 8-25 db relying upon the the path loss in other frequency bands (medium idea of the physical condition, and another 10 db wave (MW), short wave (SW or HF), micro wave to maintain a strategic distance from the fading (SHF) although the actual calculations and because of development. [16] equations may slightly be dissimilar to those for VHF/UHF. Dependable prediction of the path 2.1 Propagation Models loss in the SW/HF band is particularly difficult, and its accuracy is comparable to weather A radio propagation model, otherwise called the predictions [16]. Easy approximations for Radio Wave Propagation Model or the Radio calculating the path loss over distances Frequency Propagation Model is an empirical significantly shorter than the distance to the radio mathematical plan for the characterization of skyline: In free space the path loss increases radio wave propagation as a function of with 20 dB every decade (one decade is when frequency, distance and other conditions. The the distance between the transmitter and the conduct of propagation for every single receiver increases ten times) or 6dB for every comparable connection under comparable octave (one octave is when the distance between constraints is usually predicted with a solitary the transmitter and the receiver pairs).