DOCSLIB.ORG

Testimony of Professor Peter Swire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Testimony of Professor Peter Swire TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR PETER SWIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1-1 Part 1: Biographical Summary for Peter Swire............................................................................1-4 Part 2: Systemic Safeguards in US Law and Practice..................................................................1-5 I. Systemic Safeguards in Foreign Intelligence ..................................................................1-6 A. The US as a Constitutional Democracy under the Rule of Law ...................................1-6 B. Statutory Safeguards over Foreign Intelligence Surveillance .......................................1-7 1. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ..........................................................1-8 2. Collection of Metadata under Section 215..............................................................1-9 3. Collection of Communications under Section 702 .................................................1-10 C. Oversight of Surveillance Activities .............................................................................1-11 D. Transparency Safeguards ..............................................................................................1-12 E. Executive Safeguards ....................................................................................................1-14 II. Systemic Safeguards in Law Enforcement .....................................................................1-15 III. Conclusion on Systemic Safeguards ................................................................................1-16 Part 3: Individual Remedies in US Privacy Law ........................................................................1-17 I. Individual Remedies Against the United States Government.......................................1-18 A. US Civil Judicial Remedies ..........................................................................................1-18 B. US Criminal Judicial Remedies ....................................................................................1-22 II. Non-Judicial Individual Remedies in the US against the US Government .................1-23 III. Additional US Privacy Remedies under Federal Law ...................................................1-24 IV. Enforcement under US State Law and Private Rights of Action .................................1-25 V. US Privacy Remedies Concerns in the Irish Data Protection Commissioner’s Affidavit .............................................................................................................................1-25 VI. Conclusions on Individual Remedies, with a Caveat .....................................................1-27 Part 4: The Potential Breadth of the Decision and Assessing the Adequacy of Protections for Transfers to the US ......................................................................................................................1-29 I. The Broad US Definition of “Service Providers” Affected by a Ruling ......................1-29 II. The US Has Stronger Systemic Safeguards than the BRIC Countries ........................1-30 III. An Inadequacy Finding for SCCs May Have Implications for Other Lawful Bases for Data Transfers ...................................................................................................................1-33 IV. Economic Well-Being of the Country .............................................................................1-35 A. European Union statements about the Importance of the Transatlantic Economic Relationship. .................................................................................................................1-35 B. Trade Agreements Including the General Agreement on Trade in Services ................1-36 i V. National Security ...............................................................................................................1-37 Part 5: Concluding Discussion ....................................................................................................1-39 CHAPTER 2: BIOGRAPHICAL CHAPTER OF PETER SWIRE I. Expertise in EU Data Protection Law .............................................................................2-2 II. Expertise in US Surveillance Law ...................................................................................2-5 Annex to Chapter 2: Reforms Recommended in my 2004 Article titled “The System of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Law” and Corresponding US Reforms ............................2-9 I. Ending the Bulk Collection Power under Section 215 to Obtain Records Other Than Tangible Items ..............................................................................................................2-9 II. The Inclusion of a More Adversarial System in the FISC ............................................2-10 III. The Addition of Adversary Counsel in FISCR Appeals ...............................................2-11 IV. Greater Use of Inspector General Oversight after the Fact...........................................2-11 V. Reduced Use of the “Gag Rule” ...................................................................................2-12 VI. Improved Record-Keeping on the Use of National Security Letters ............................2-14 VII. Notification to Data Subjects after the FISA Surveillance Had Concluded .................2-14 VIII. Disclosure of Legal Theories Accepted by the FISC....................................................2-15 IX. Formalization of Minimization Procedures Used by the FISC .....................................2-15 X. Ensuring Surveillance under FISA is Focused on Foreign Intelligence Purposes........2-16 ii CHAPTER 3: SYSTEMIC SAFEGUARDS IN THE US SYSTEM OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE LAW I. The United States as a Constitutional Democracy under the Rule of Law .................3-2 A. A Time-Tested System of Checks and Balances ..........................................................3-3 B. Judicial Independence ...................................................................................................3-3 C. Constitutional Protections of Individual Rights ............................................................3-4 D. Democratic Accountability ...........................................................................................3-6 II. Historical Context for Systemic Safeguards against Excessive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance .......................................................................................................................3-6 A. The 1960s and 1970s ....................................................................................................3-6 B. Surveillance after the Attacks of September 11, 2001 ..................................................3-9 C. The Reforms after the Snowden Disclosures ................................................................3-10 III. Statutory Safeguards for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance .........................................3-12 A. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Traditional FISA Orders .................3-12 1. The Structure of the FISC under FISA ....................................................................3-12 2. Summary of the Case Study on How the FISC Has Applied the Safeguards ..........3-15 B. Collection of Documents and Other Tangible Things under Section 215 ....................3-16 C. Collection of Electronic Communications under Section 702 ......................................3-18 1. The Legal Structure of Section 702 ........................................................................3-18 2. Popular Misunderstandings of the PRISM Program ...............................................3-21 3. The Upstream Program ...........................................................................................3-24 D. Conclusion on Section 702 ...........................................................................................3-25 IV. Oversight Mechanisms .....................................................................................................3-26 A. Executive Agency Inspectors General ..........................................................................3-26 B. Legislative Oversight ....................................................................................................3-28 C. Independent Review: Review Group and PCLOB .......................................................3-29 D. The Federal Privacy Council and Privacy and Civil Liberties Offices in the Agencies ..................................................................................................................3-33 V. Transparency Mechanisms ..............................................................................................3-34 A. Greater Transparency by the Executive Branch about Surveillance Activities ............3-34 B. USA FREEDOM Act Provisions Mandating Public Law about Major FISC Decisions .............................................................................................................3-35 C. The FISC and Numerous Opinions Declassified at IC on the Record ..........................3-36 D. Transparency Reports by the US Government .............................................................3-36 E. Transparency Reports by Companies ............................................................................3-37 VI. Executive Branch Safeguards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse
    USA SEE NO EVIL GOVERNMENT TURNS THE OTHER WAY AS JUDGES MAKE FINDINGS ABOUT TORTURE AND OTHER ABUSE Amnesty International Publications First published in February 2011 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2011 Index: AMR 51/005/2011 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Judges point to human rights violations, executive turns away ........................................... 4 Absence
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission Report Of
    District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission Report of Recommendations and Chief Judge Designations and Presidential Appointments to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia May 8, 1975 to September 30, 2013 INTRODUCTION On October 31, 2011, the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission (“JNC” or “Commission”) published an historic report of JNC recommendations made to the President of the United States, Presidential appointments to the District of Columbia courts, and the JNC’s designations of the Chief Judges for those courts, with the commitment to update the report annually. The report relies on available records, including Congressional and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission records, as well as notices published in the Daily Washington Law Reporter. This is the second annual update of the report. The Commission Chair, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, gives special recognition and expresses his appreciation to Executive Director Kim M. Whatley and Summer Intern Joseph R.A. Fruth for their tireless and meticulous efforts in researching and compiling the initial report, which spans forty years and encompasses the various branches of both the federal and District of Columbia governments. Judge Sullivan also expresses his appreciation to Addy Schmitt, Esquire, for first suggesting this project more than five years ago and devoting many hours since then to its completion, and to Executive Assistant Eunice Holt-Martin for her assistance and support in this endeavor. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia were established by Congress on July 29, 1970 (Public Law 91-358, 84 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1
    SPRING 2020, Vol. 34, Issue 1 SPRING 2020 1 MISSION NAWJ’s mission is to promote the judicial role of protecting the rights of individuals under the rule of law through strong, committed, diverse judicial leadership; fairness and equality in the courts; and ON THE COVER 19 Channeling Sugar equal access to justice. Innovative Efforts to Improve Access to Justice through Global Judicial Leadership 21 Learning Lessons from Midyear Meeting in New Orleans addresses Tough Cases BOARD OF DIRECTORS ongoing challenges facing access to justice. Story on page 14 24 Life After the Bench: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Honorable Sharon Mettler PRESIDENT 2 President's Message Hon. Bernadette D'Souza 26 Trial Advocacy Training for Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Louisiana 2 Interim Executive Director's Women by Women Message PRESIDENT-ELECT 29 District News Hon. Karen Donohue 3 VP of Publications Message King County Superior Court, Seattle, Washington 51 District Directors & Committees 4 Q&A with Judge Ann Breen-Greco VICE PRESIDENT, DISTRICTS Co-Chair Human Trafficking 52 Sponsors Hon. Elizabeth A. White Committee Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County 54 New Members 5 Independent Immigration Courts VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLICATIONS Hon. Heidi Pasichow 7 Resource Board Profile Superior Court of the District of Columbia Cathy Winter-Palmer SECRETARY Hon. Orlinda Naranjo (ret.) 8 Global Judicial Leadership 419th District Court of Texas, Austin Doing the Impossible: NAWJ work with the Pan-American TREASURER Commission of Judges on Social Hon. Elizabeth K. Lee Rights Superior Court of California, San Mateo County IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT 11 Global Judicial Leadership Hon. Tamila E.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidentiality Complications
    Confidentiality Complications: How new rules, technologies and corporate practices affect the reporter’s privilege and further demonstrate the need for a federal shield law The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press June 2007 Lucy A. Dalglish, Esq. Gregg P. Leslie, Esq. Elizabeth J. Soja, Esq. 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 807-2100 Executive Summary The corporate structure of the news media has created new obstacles, both financial and practical, for journalists who must keep promises of confidentiality. Information that once existed only in a reporter’s notebook can now be accessed by companies that have obligations not only to their reporters, but to their shareholders, their other employees, and the public. Additionally, in the wake of an unprecedented settlement in the Wen Ho Lee Privacy Act case, parties can target news media corporations not just for their access to a reporter’s information, but also for their deep pockets. The potential for conflicts of interest is staggering, but the primary concerns of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press are that: • because of the 21st-century newsroom’s reliance on technology, corporations now have access to notes, correspondence and work-product information that before only existed in a reporter’s notebook; • the new federal “e-discovery” court rules allow litigants to discover vastly more information than a printed page – or even a saved e-mail – would provide during litigation; • while reporters generally only have responsibilities to themselves,
    [Show full text]
  • GLBT, Vatican Child Molester Protection --- Newsfollowup.Com
    GLBT, Vatican child molester protection --- NewsFollowUp.com NewsFollowUp.com search Obama pictorial index sitemap home Gay / Lesbian News for the 99% ...................................Refresh F5...archive home 50th Anniversary of JFK assassination "Event of a Lifetime" at the Fess Parker Double Tree Inn. JFKSantaBarbara. below Homosexuality is natural, Livescience There's no link between homosexuality and pedophilia ... The Catholic Church would have you believe otherwise. more = go to NFU pages Gay Bashing. Legislation Gay marriage Media Gays in the Military Troy King, Alabama Attorney General, homophobe. related topics: AIDS Health Social Umbrella PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* Advocate.com stop the slaughter of LGBT's in Iraq GOP hypocrisy? CAW gay and lesbian rights wins, pension info Egale, Canada, to advance equality for Canadian LGBT Gay Blog news Gaydata Gay media database, info Answers Jeff "Gannon, Gaysource Lesbian, gay, Bisexual, Transgender Crist, Foley, Haggard... who knew the GOP was below Community having a coming out party? We could have been DOMA, Defense of Marriage Act Gay World travel, media, news, health, shopping supportive of their decisions to give oral sex to male American Family Association preservation of traditional GLAD Gay Lesbian Advocates and Defenders prostitutes but they went and outlawed it.... family. Boycott Ford for contributing to gay issues. GLAAD Media coverage of openly gay, lesbian, Canada, Netherlands, Belgium and Spain have all bisexual, and transgender candidates and elected legalized gay marriage as of July, 2005 officials in the West does not seem to be focusing on Daily Comet the sexual orientation of those candidates. DayLife "U.S. Republican presidential candidate John Human Rights Campaign lgbt equal rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers' Biographies
    Kofi Annan Edition NEW TECHNOLOGY AS A DISRUPTIVE GLOBAL FORCE MONDAY 21 JANUARY 2019 SPEAKERS LIZ ALDERMAN YANN ALGAN LAKHDAR BRAHIMI SIR RICHARD BRANSON GRO HARLEM BRUNDTLAND GIOVANNI BUTTARELLI DOMINIQUE CARDON MARIA CHIARA CARROZZA PETER COWHEY STEVEN ERLANGER HOUDA-IMANE FARAOUN CASPER KLYNGE ENRICO LETTA CARLOS LOPES FRÉDÉRIC MION ADAM NOSSITER VALERIO RIAVEZ ANNIKA SILVA-LEANDER DAN SMITH MARGRETHE VESTAGER #YLSummit19 1 LIZ ALDERMAN YANN ALGAN Chief business correspondent in Europe, Professor of Economics • New York Times Dean, School of Public Affairs, Sciences Po @LizAldermanNYT @sciencespo Liz Alderman is the Paris-based chief European business correspondent Yann Algan is the Dean of the School of Public Affairs and Professor for The New York Times, covering economic and inequality challenges of Economics at Sciences Po. around Europe. His research focuses on Digital Economy and E-government. He also From Greece to Sweden, she chronicles the hit to societies from weak specializes on Social capital, Trust and Well-being in relation to individual growth and joblessness, and reports on emerging innovations to address outcomes and economic behavior, with particular attention to the role inequality. Her coverage has included Europe’s refugee crisis and the Paris of education, management, and institutions. terrorist attacks. Along the way, she has profiled numerous European movers and shakers in policy making and business. His work incorporates methods from psychology, economics and big data, including randomized evaluations of public policies. In 2013, Ms. Alderman received The Times’s Nathaniel Nash Award for her “excellence in business and economics journalism.” She was part of a He is a member of the OECD High Level Expert Group on Well-Being, and team awarded by The Society of American Business Editors and Writers is affiliated with CEPR and IZA.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Programme
    Final Programme Follow us OFFICIAL CORPORATE SUPPORTER @IBAevents #IBARome Expert and professional advice since 1975 The law firm Studio Legale Tributario Fantozzi & Associati was established in 1975 by Augusto Fantozzi, a lawyer and full professor of tax law at the ‘’La Sapienza’’ and ‘’LUISS’’ Universities in Rome. Professor Fantozzi was the Italian Minister for Finance and the Minister of Foreign Trade between 1995 and 1998, and he is a member of the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors of several leading Italian companies and multinational corporations. The Firm has offices in Rome, Milan and Bologna. With 8 Senior Partners, all lawyers or chartered accountants, and more than 30 legal professionals, the Firm is highly specialised in tax law, and as such provides clients with advice on Italian and international fiscal law, and assists them in tax litigation. Thanks to the years of experience of its partners and legal professionals, the Firm can offer clients full support in resolving tax and corporate issues, both nationally and internationally. Over the years the Firm has dealt with the fiscal aspects of numerous important corporate and financial operations carried out by public and private companies, banks, finance companies and insurance undertakings, and has become their go-to adviser on ordinary and extraordinary tax matters. ROMA | MILANO | BOLOGNA www.fantozzieassociati.com Follow us CONTENTS Contents @IBAevents #IBARome Introduction by the President of the IBA 5 IBA Management Board and IBA Staff 6 Opening
    [Show full text]
  • Newsfollowup.Com Transparencyplanet, Promote Open Govt/Biz
    NewsFollowUp.com TransparencyPlanet, Promote open govt/biz NewsFollowUp.com Franklingate sex scandal econ charts pictorial index sitemap home Mukasey, Gonazales U.S. Judiciary / DOJ_2 replacement ... Will Mukasey sabotage the Rosen Weissman trial? below back to Judiciary page 1 Conflict of interest, below DOJ, Mukasey, Rosen, Weissman Sibel Edmonds U. S. Supreme Court and Federal Courts Stacking courts International Courts Judge Reggie Walton Watch 'Protect Act' & Judicial discretion Giuliani / Mukasey / Kerik Conflicts of Interest Please Donate to NewsFollowUp.com to help us continue this work. News Research: Topic Index Plame / Wilson / Novak Pentagon mole, AIPAC Spies AIPAC, Giuliani, Mukasey Common Plamegate Timeline AIPAC Mukasey, Rosen, Weissman Flight 77, Pentagon Brewster Jennings & Assc. AIPAC - Cheney Clinton, AIPAC, Iran Marc Rich, L. Libby Flow chart AIPAC Rosen Weisman Iraq War Iran / Syria Operations Group Leakers, Leak Launderers? Trial Iran Iran, Iraq Miller, Judith & subpoena AMDOCS Rosen Weissman Timeline Israeli Art Students, 9/11 Anthrax Iraq War Plans 2001 Giuliani, Mukasey, Palfrey Ledeen - Fascism Miller, WMD deception 9/11 Propaganda Cheney / B-52 / Syria / Iran Niger, Forged Yellowcake Timeline Archive Israeli Intelligence, Iran Israel documents Timeline: 1970 1980 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Archive & (2006) under construction Mukasey, Rosen, Weissman and Clinton top PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* Alex Geana Blackwater / Blackstone group Family Research Council, stop filibuster of connections Summary Fed judges. Antiwar "in Rosen's own secretly-recorded Feinstein The shadow of Israel / AIPAC words – about the Khobar Towers terrorist over Washington. Whitehouse press releases, on Protect Act attack, which he claimed he had received Latest trial date January 14, 2008 McConnell, Mitch, Senator Conservative from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT of COLUMBIA JUDICIAL NOMINATION COMMISSION DC SUPERIOR COURT the Honorable Emmet G
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL NOMINATION COMMISSION DC SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Emmet G. Sullivan 515 5th STREET, NW Chairperson SUITE 235 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 Bianca Garcia (202) 879-0478 (Phone) Executive Director (202) 737-9126 (Fax) Website: http://jnc.dc.gov Email: [email protected] February 11, 2019 The Honorable Charles Allen Chairperson, Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 110 Washington, DC 20004 Dear Chairperson Allen: On behalf of the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission (“Commission”), I respectfully provide the following responses to the questions set forth in your letter dated January 15, 2019. General Questions 1. Please provide a current organizational chart for the agency, including the number of vacant, frozen, and filled positions in each division or subdivision. Include the names and titles of all senior personnel, and note the date that the information was collected on the chart. a. Please provide an explanation of the roles and responsibilities of each division and subdivision. Response: See Attachment 1, the Commission’s organizational chart. b. Please provide a narrative explanation of any changes to the organizational chart made during the previous year. Response: There were no organizational changes made during the previous year. 2. Please provide a current Schedule A for the agency which identifies each position by program and activity codes, with the employee’s name, title/position, salary, fringe benefits, and length of time with the agency. Please note the date that the information was collected. The Schedule A should also indicate if the position is continuing/term/temporary/contract or if it is vacant or frozen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oral History of William J. Bauer Circuit Judge of The
    THE ORAL HISTORY OF WILLIAM J. BAUER CIRCUIT JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT AS TOLD TO COLLINS T. FITZPATRICK CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT 2016 CTF: Today is August 20, 2014, and we’re in the chambers of Circuit Judge William Bauer, and we’re doing his oral history, and I am Collins Fitzpatrick, the Circuit Executive. Bill, why don’t you tell me a little bit about where, as far back as you know, the Bauers came from. WJB: Well, Bauer means either farmer or peasant in German so they came from Germany. My immediate, closest relative from there is my grandfather Bauer whose name was John, and he immigrated to the United States from Munich. His wife’s name was Katherine, with a K, Berger. CTF: Do you know what he did in Germany? WJB: I haven’t the foggiest idea. He worked in a plant some place. Driving force in that duo was apparently my grandmother, Katherine Berger and she was from Rosenheim, which was right next door to Munich in the Alps. 1 CTF: When did they immigrate? WJB: I think about 1890. I know it was before they opened the immigration center at Ellis Island. They already had one child in Germany and she was pregnant with a second child. The boat left Hamburg and got here sometime around 1890. And they were joining Katherine’s brother, obviously a Berger, Louie Berger who had a job in Chicago and said he thought he could get John a job in Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    European Data Protection Supervisor ANNUAL 2015 REPORT An Executive Summary of this Report which gives an overview of key developments in EDPS activities in 2015 is also available. Further details about the EDPS can be found on our website at http://www.edps.europa.eu The website also details a subscription feature to our newsletter. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-9242-092-5 ISSN 1830-5474 doi:10.2804/27186 QT-AA-16-001-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9242-090-1 ISSN 1830-9585 doi:10.2804/641327 QT-AA-16-001-EN-N EPUB ISBN 978-92-9242-091-8 ISSN 1830-9585 doi:10.2804/5606 QT-AA-16-001-EN-E © European Union, 2016 © Photos: iStockphoto/EDPS & European Union Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Italy PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER (ECF) ANNUAL 2015 REPORT European Data Protection Supervisor | Contents ► FOREWORD 5 ► MISSION STATEMENT, VALUES AND PRINCIPLES 7 ► EDPS STRATEGY 2015-2019 8 1. 2015 - An Overview 9 1.1 Data protection and the EDPS in 2015 9 1.2 Data protection reform 9 1.3 Leading by example 10 1.4 Data protection on the ground 10 1.5 Cooperation with data protection authorities in the EU 10 1.6 Identifying policy solutions 11 1.7 Technology 11 1.8 International interaction 12 1.9 Communicating our message 12 1.10 Internal administration 12 1.11 Key Performance Indicators 2015-2019 13 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Circuit Circuit
    December 2019 Featured In This Issue In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo TheThe A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo CirCircuitcuit Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally RiderRiderT HE J OURNALOFTHE S EVENTH In Recognition of Barbara Crabb, Comments By Diane P. Wood C IRCUITIRCUIT B AR A SSOCIATION Around the Circuit, By Collins T. Fitzpatrick J u d g e s The Circuit Rider In This Issue Letter from the President . 1 In Memoriam Randall Crocker, By Jeffrey Cole . 2 An Interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, By Hon. Elaine Bucklo . 3-12 A Historic Chief, By Steven J. Dollear . .13-15 An Interview with Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Editor’s Note By Jeffrey Cole . .16-28 A Life Well Lived: An Interview with Justice John Paul Stevens, By Jeffrey Cole and Elaine E. Bucklo . 29-38 Appeals: The Classic Guide, By William Pannill . .39-48 John Paul Stevens: A True Gentleman of Justice, By Rachael D. Wilson . 49-51 Reversing the Magistrate Judge, By Jeffrey Cole . 52-59 Answering the Call, part 2: The Northern District of Illinois’ Rockford Bankruptcy Help Desk, By Laura McNally .
    [Show full text]