Philippine Urban Mobility Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Philippine Urban Mobility Programme Philippine Urban Mobility Programme Towards people-first cities empowered by efficient, dignified, and sustainable mobility Concept Document: Philippine Urban Mobility Programme Project Background Transport is the highest energy-consuming sector in 40% of all countries worldwide, and causes about a quarter of energy-related CO2 emissions. To limit global warming to two degrees, an extensive transformation and decarbonisation of transport is necessary. The TRANSfer project’s objective is to increase the efforts of developing countries and emerging economies for climate-friendly transport. The project acts as a mitigation action preparation facility and thus, specifically supports the implementation of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) of the Paris Agreement. The project supports several countries (including Peru, Colombia, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia) in developing greenhouse gas mitigation measures in transport. The TRANSfer project is implemented by GIZ and funded by the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) and operates on three levels. Mobilise Prepare Stimulate Facilitating the Preparation of Knowledge products, Training, MobiliseYourCity Mitigation Measures and Dialogue Partnership Standardised support Based on these experiences, TRANSfer The goal of the multi- packages (toolkits) are is sharing and disseminating best stakeholder partnership developed and used for the practises. This is achieved through the MobiliseYourCity, which is preparation of selected development of knowledge products, currently being supported by mitigation measures. As a the organisation of events and trainings, France, Germany and the result, measures can be and the contribution to an increasing European Commission, is that prepared more efficiently, level of ambition. Personal exchange of 100 cities and 20 national until they are ready for experience and dialogue is promoted at governments commit to implementation and eligible events, including the annual Transport ambitious climate action for (climate) financing. and Climate Change Week in Berlin, the targets for urban transport and Accumulated over 10 years, United Nations Climate Change take appropriate measures. the targeted measures aim for Conference (COP) or the International a total reduction potential of Transport Forum. 60 MtCO2. Meet us at www.changing-transport.org Concept Document: Philippine Urban Mobility Programme Disclaimer The content presented in this document has been compiled with the utmost care. Nevertheless, GIZ gives no guarantee that the information provided is current, accurate, complete or error-free. GIZ accepts no liability for damage or loss arising directly or indirectly from the use of this document, provided it has not been caused intentionally or by gross negligence. GIZ expressly reserves the right to modify or append this document in part or in whole without prior notice, or to halt publication completely or for a limited period. Cartographic presentations in no way constitute recognition under international law of boundaries and territories. The content of GIZ GmbH’s documents is protected by copyright. The images used are marked with photo credits where required by law. The use of any images requires the prior consent of GIZ GmbH, if not stated otherwise. Acknowledgements We would especially like to express our sincere gratitude to the following government officials and experts for their input, contributions, and support in the development of the Philippine Urban Mobility Programme and this Concept Document: Ruben Reinoso (Undersecretary for Planning, Department of Transportation), Thomas Orbos (former Undersecretary for Road and Transport Infrastructure, DOTr), Mark Richmund De Leon (OIC-Undersecretary for Road and Transport Infrastructure, DOTr), Jonathan Uy (OIC-Undersecretary for Investment Programming, National Economic and Development Authority), Sheilah Napalang (Assistant Secretary for Planning, DOTr), Roderick Planta (Assistant Secretary for Investment Programming, NEDA), Martin Delgra III (Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board), Sandy Gaspay (DOTr), Chie Suñe (NEDA), Glynda Bathan (Clean Air Asia), John Barry, Kathleen Demetera (CAA), Diane Fajardo, Jon Harris (Integrated Transport Planning Ltd), Alvin Mejia (CAA), Ciaran Meyers (ITP), Cresencio Montalbo, Jr. (University of the Philippines), Joemier Pontawe (CAA), Alan Silayan (CAA), Mark Tacderas (CAA), Bronwen Thornton (Walk21), Jim Walker (Walk21). Content Executive Summary ................................................................................. viii The Philippine Urban Mobility Programme ................................................................ viii PUMP Thematic Areas ...........................................................................................ix PUMP Timelines, Phasing .......................................................................................xi Financing of the PUMP and Activities ....................................................................... xii Implementation of the PUMP ................................................................................ xiv Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................... xiv 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 2. Sector Overview: Philippine Urban Mobility ................................................. 4 2.1 Relevance of the Sub-Sector ............................................................................ 4 2.2 Transport and Climate Policy Context ................................................................. 7 2.3 Governance, Market Organisation, and Stakeholders .............................................. 10 2.4 Finance and Current Business Model(s) ............................................................... 15 2.5 Related Initiatives ........................................................................................ 18 3. Barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility in the Philippines ................................20 3.1 Barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility in the Philippines ......................................... 20 3.2 Barriers Specific to PUMP Themes ..................................................................... 24 4. The Philippine Urban Mobility Programme ..................................................27 4.1 Vision and Objectives .................................................................................... 27 4.2 Themes and Components ............................................................................... 28 4.3 Scope ....................................................................................................... 30 4.4 Non-Motorised Transport Activities and Actions .................................................... 31 4.5 Public Transport Activities and Actions .............................................................. 40 4.6 Urban Freight Activities and Actions .................................................................. 42 4.7 Travel Demand Management ........................................................................... 47 4.8 Transit Oriented Development ......................................................................... 47 4.9 Implementation Arrangement (organisational measures) ......................................... 48 5. Financing Concept ...............................................................................50 5.1 Implementation Costs and Revenues.................................................................. 51 5.2 Non-Motorised Transport (NMT) ....................................................................... 51 5.3 Public Transport .......................................................................................... 53 5.4 Urban Freight Costs and Revenues .................................................................... 57 6. Expected Benefits and MRV Approach ........................................................59 6.1 Cause-Impact Chain ...................................................................................... 59 6.2 Assessment Boundaries .................................................................................. 62 6.3 Ex Ante Impact Assessment ............................................................................. 65 6.3.1. Baseline and Mitigation Scenarios ............................................................. 65 6.3.2. Methodology for Calculation .................................................................... 67 6.3.3. Data ................................................................................................. 67 6.3.4. Expected Benefits ................................................................................ 70 6.3.4.1. GHG Mitigation Impact ..................................................................... 70 6.3.4.2. Sustainable Development Benefits ....................................................... 71 6.4 Monitoring and Reporting Plan ......................................................................... 73 Bibliography ...........................................................................................78 Annex 1: Transport Plans, Programmes, Policies ..........................................82 Annex 2: Barriers to Non-Motorised Transport .............................................89 Annex 3: Detailed Assumptions ....................................................................92
Recommended publications
  • Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management (PSALM) Corporation
    PES Form 4 1st Quarter Monitoring Report Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management (PSALM) Corporation Accomplishments Component Board-approved 1/ (as of 31 March 2021) Strategic Objective (SO)/ Rating Formula Weight % Annual Target Actual Strategic Measure(SM) System SO 1: Reduced financial obligations (FO) SM 1 Amount of Net Reduction in FO 30.0 Actual over PHP24.630 Billion 퐹푂푝푟푒푣푖표푢푠 − 퐹푂푐푢푟푟푒푛푡 푦푒푎푟 푦푒푎푟 Target (Reduction from PHP411.827 Billion to PHP387.197 Billion) Forex Used: 2019 Year-end rate (PHP50.744 = US$1) PHP23.004 Billion not yet available (Restated) (Reduction from PHP381.72 Billion to PHP358.72 Billion) Forex Used: 2020 Year-end rate (PHP48.036 = US$1) SO 2: Ensured strong financial performance SM 2 Collection Efficiency for Current 퐶표푙푙푒푐푡표푛푠 푓푟표푚 10.0 Actual over 93% not yet available Power Sales 퐶푢푟푟푒푛푡 푃표푤푒푟 푆푎푙푒푠 Target 퐶푢푟푟푒푛푡 푃표푤푒푟 푆푎푙푒푠 92% (Revised target per letter to GCG dated 18 Dec. 2020) SM 3 Amount of Delinquent/ Overdue 5.0 Actual over PHP0.951 Billion not yet available Accounts Collected Σ 퐴푐푡푢푎푙 퐶표푙푙푒푐푡표푛 Target ⬚ PHP0.359 Billion (Revised target per letter to GCG dated 18 Dec. 2020) SM 4 Percentage Share of Overhead 푃푆 + 푀푂푂퐸 − 퐵푎푑 퐷푒푏푡푠 5.0 Actual over 11.15% not yet available Expenses to Total Income 푇표푡푎푙 퐼푛푐표푚푒 Target PHP1.307 Billion PHP11.727 Billion PerspectiveFinancial 1: Actual over 2/ SM 5 EBITDA Margin of Operating 퐸퐵퐼푇퐷퐴 표푓 푂푝푒푟푎푡푛푔 5.0 5.85% not yet available Power Assets 푃표푤푒푟 퐴푠푠푒푡푠 Target PHP1.846 Billion 푁푒푡 푈푡푙푡푦 푅푒푣푒푛푢푒 PHP31.554 Billion SM 6 Universal Charge (UC) Σ 푈퐶 퐴푐푡푢푎푙
    [Show full text]
  • Current Bus Service Operating Characteristics Along EDSA, Metro Manila
    TSSP 22 nd Annual Conference of the Transportation Science Society of the Philippines Iloilo City, Philippines, 12 Sept 2014 2014 Current Bus Service Operating Characteristics Along EDSA, Metro Manila Krister Ian Daniel Z. ROQUEL Alexis M. FILLONE, Ph.D. Research Specialist Associate Professor Civil Engineering Department Civil Engineering Department De La Salle University - Manila De La Salle University - Manila 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Epifanio Delos Santos Avenue (EDSA) has been the focal point of many transportation studies over the past decade, aiming towards the improvement of traffic conditions across Metro Manila. Countless researches have tested, suggested and reviewed proposed improvements on the traffic condition. This paper focuses on investigating the overall effects of the operational and administrative changes in the study area over the past couple of years, from the full system operation of the Mass Rail Transit (MRT) in the year 2000 to the present (2014), to the service operating characteristics of buses plying the EDSA route. It was found that there are no significant changes in the average travel and running speeds for buses running Southbound, while there is a noticeable improvement for those going Northbound. As for passenger-kilometers carried, only minor changes were found. The journey time composition percentages did not show significant changes over the two time frames as well. For the factors contributing to passenger-related time, the presence of air-conditioning and the direction of travel were found to contribute as well, aside from the number of embarking and/or disembarking passengers and number of standing passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of CRM Learning Destinations in the Philippines 2Nd
    Directory of CRMLearningDestinations in the Philippines by League of Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP), Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project, World Wide Fund for Nature- Philippines (WWF-Philippines), and Conservation International (CI). 2ND EDITION 2009 Printed in Cebu City, Philippines Citation: LMP, FISH Project, WWF-Philippines, and CI-Philippines. 2009. Directory of CRM Learning Destinations in the Philippines. 2nd Edition. League of Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP), Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project, World Wide Fund for Nature-Philippines (WWF-Philippines), and Conservation International-Philippines (CI-Philippines). Cebu City, Philippines. This publication was made possible through support provided by the Fisheries Improved for Sustainable Harvest (FISH) Project of the Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms and conditions of USAID Contract Nos. AID-492-C-00-96-00028- 00 and AID-492-C-00-03-00022-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID. This publication may be reproduced or quoted in other publications as long as proper reference is made to the source. Partner coordination: Howard Cafugauan, Marlito Guidote, Blady Mancenido, and Rebecca Pestaño-Smith Contributions: Camiguin Coastal Resource Management Project: Evelyn Deguit Conservation International-Philippines: Pacifico Beldia II, Annabelle Cruz-Trinidad and Sheila Vergara Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation: Atty. Rose-Liza Eisma-Osorio FISH Project: Atty. Leoderico Avila, Jr., Kristina Dalusung, Joey Gatus, Aniceta Gulayan, Moh.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in Cdi Cities
    ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 JANUARY 27, 2017 This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and do not necessarily reflect the view of USAID or the United States Agency for International Development USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page i Pre-Feasibility Study for the Upgrading of the Tagbilaran City Slaughterhouse ASSESSMENT OF IMPEDIMENTS TO URBAN-RURAL CONNECTIVITY IN CDI CITIES Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project CONTRACT NO. AID-492-H-15-00001 Program Title: USAID/SURGE Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Philippines Contract Number: AID-492-H-15-00001 Contractor: International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Date of Publication: January 27, 2017 USAID Strengthening Urban Resilience for Growth with Equity (SURGE) Project Page ii Assessment of Impediments to Urban-Rural Connectivity in CDI Cities Contents I. Executive Summary 1 II. Introduction 7 II. Methodology 9 A. Research Methods 9 B. Diagnostic Tool to Assess Urban-Rural Connectivity 9 III. City Assessments and Recommendations 14 A. Batangas City 14 B. Puerto Princesa City 26 C. Iloilo City 40 D. Tagbilaran City 50 E. Cagayan de Oro City 66 F. Zamboanga City 79 Tables Table 1. Schedule of Assessments Conducted in CDI Cities 9 Table 2. Cargo Throughput at the Batangas Seaport, in metric tons (2015 data) 15 Table 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation History of the Philippines
    Transportation history of the Philippines This article describes the various forms of transportation in the Philippines. Despite the physical barriers that can hamper overall transport development in the country, the Philippines has found ways to create and integrate an extensive transportation system that connects the over 7,000 islands that surround the archipelago, and it has shown that through the Filipinos' ingenuity and creativity, they have created several transport forms that are unique to the country. Contents • 1 Land transportation o 1.1 Road System 1.1.1 Main highways 1.1.2 Expressways o 1.2 Mass Transit 1.2.1 Bus Companies 1.2.2 Within Metro Manila 1.2.3 Provincial 1.2.4 Jeepney 1.2.5 Railways 1.2.6 Other Forms of Mass Transit • 2 Water transportation o 2.1 Ports and harbors o 2.2 River ferries o 2.3 Shipping companies • 3 Air transportation o 3.1 International gateways o 3.2 Local airlines • 4 History o 4.1 1940s 4.1.1 Vehicles 4.1.2 Railways 4.1.3 Roads • 5 See also • 6 References • 7 External links Land transportation Road System The Philippines has 199,950 kilometers (124,249 miles) of roads, of which 39,590 kilometers (24,601 miles) are paved. As of 2004, the total length of the non-toll road network was reported to be 202,860 km, with the following breakdown according to type: • National roads - 15% • Provincial roads - 13% • City and municipal roads - 12% • Barangay (barrio) roads - 60% Road classification is based primarily on administrative responsibilities (with the exception of barangays), i.e., which level of government built and funded the roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Hub Identification of the Metro Manila Road Network Using Pagerank Paper Identification Number: AYRF15-015 Jacob CHAN1, Kardi TEKNOMO2
    “Transportation for A Better Life: Harnessing Finance for Safety and Equity in AEC August 21, 2015, Bangkok, Thailand Hub Identification of the Metro Manila Road Network Using PageRank Paper Identification Number: AYRF15-015 Jacob CHAN1, Kardi TEKNOMO2 1Department of Information Systems and Computer Science, School of Science and Engineering Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines 1108 Telephone +632-426-6001, Fax. +632-4261214 E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Information Systems and Computer Science, School of Science and Engineering Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines 1108 Telephone +632-426-6001, Fax. +632-4261214 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We attempt to identify the different node hubs of a road network using PageRank for preparation for possible random terrorist attacks. The robustness of a road network against such attack is crucial to be studied because it may cripple its connectivity by simply shutting down these hubs. We show the important hubs in a road network based on network structure and propose a model for robustness analysis. By identifying important hubs in a road network, possible preparation schemes may be done earlier to mitigate random terrorist attacks, including defense reinforcement and transportation security. A case study of the Metro Manila road network is also presented. The case study shows that the most important hubs in the Metro Manila road network are near airports, piers, major highways and expressways. Keywords: PageRank, Terrorist Attack, Robustness 1. Introduction Table 1 Comparative analysis of different Roads are important access points because methodologies on network robustness indices connects different places like cities, districts, and Author Method Strength Weakness landmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
    1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 101092015001068 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECBuild ing, EDSA, Greenhills,MandaluyongCity, Metro Manila, Philippines Tel:(632) 726-0931 to 39 Fax:(632) 725-5293 Email: [email protected] Barcode Page The following document has been received: Receiving Officer/Encoder : Joselito 0 . Alfaro Receiving Branch : SEC Head Office Receipt Date and Time : January 09, 2015 02:33:58 PM Received From : Head Office Company Representative Doc Source Company Information SEC Registration No. 0000167 423 Company Name MEGAWORLD CORP. Industry Classification Company Type Stock Corporation Document Information Document ID 101092015001068 Document Type 17-C (FORM 11-C:CURRENT DISCL/RPT) Document Code 17-C Period Covered January 08, 2015 No. of Days Late 0 Department CFD Remarks C00072-2015 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-C CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SRC RULE 17.2(c) THEREUNDER 1. Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) Jan 8, 2015 2. SEC Identification Number 167423 3. BIR Tax Identification No. 000-477-103 4. Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter MEGAWORLD CORPORATION 5. Province, country or other jurisdiction of incorporation Metro Manila 6. Industry Classification Code(SEC Use Only) 7. Address of principal office 28th Floor, The World Centre, 330 Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue, Makati City, Philippines Postal Code 1227 8. Issuer's telephone number, including area code (632) 8678826 to 40 9. Former name or former address, if changed since last report N/A 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the SRC or Sections 4 and 8 of the RSA Title of Each Class Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding and Amount of Debt Outstanding Common 32,231,457,948 Preferred 6,000,000,000 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Modified Routes Allowed for the Operation of Traditional
    Republic of the Philippircs Department of Transportation LAND TRANSPORTATION FRANCHISING & REGULATORY BOARI) East Avenue, Quezon City MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO.2020 - 013 SUBJECT ADDITIONAL MODIFIED ROUTES ALLOWED FOR THE OPERATION OF TR,{DITIONAL PUJ VEHICLES DURING THE PERIOD OF GCQ IN METRO MANILA WHEREAS, pursuant to the guidelines of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for a calibrated and gradual opening of public transportation in Metro Manila and those in nearby provinces, the Board has since then made the necessary monitoring on the daily operations of thl initial routes allowed to operate; WHEREAS, under Item II.b. of MC 2020-O26,the Board may issue additional routes to resume operations based on passenger demand; WHEREAS, based on the monitoring and coordination with local government urits in Metro Manila, there is a continuous need to open additional routes for kaditional PUJs to sorye passenger demand; NOW TIIEREF0RE, for and in consideration of the foregoing the Board" hereby allows the additional routes (attached as ANNEX "A") for traditional PUJs to operate within Metro Manila and entering Metro Manila starting NOVEMBER 18, 2020 or u. *uy be allowed by the Inter-Agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Diseases (rATF-EIF) This Circular shall cover grantees of valid and existing Certificate of Public Convenience (CpC) for Public Utility Jeepneys (PUJ) or that Application for Extension of Validity of CpC has been filed for expired CPCs operating in the National Capital Region. Operators with expired CpC covered by the provisions of Board Resolution No. 062 Series of 202A dated 29 Aprii 2A20 and, Board Resolution No. 100 dated 09 May 2a20 arc tikswise coversd.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Coordination
    Malolos-Clark Railway Project (RRP PHI 52083) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION A. Major Development Partners: Strategic Foci and Key Activities 1. Major development partners in the Philippines transport sector are the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Government of Australia, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), the United Kingdom, and the World Bank (Table 1). The Republic of Korea (ROK) and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have also supported the country with transport infrastructure. Before its 2008 merger with JICA, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation provided substantial support for the transport sector. The development partners are united in supporting the national spatial strategy of the Philippine Development Plan (PDP), 2017–2022.1 ADB focuses on supporting the road and rail subsectors, and plays a supporting role in addressing governance, institutional capacity, and the low productivity of transport agencies. In addition to supporting the road subsector, ADB has extended assistance, together with JICA, for rail subsector projects. In the rail subsector, ADB and JICA will cofinance a series of projects that will eventually create investment opportunities for other cofinanciers, including private sector investors. Table 1: Major Development Partners Development Partner Project Name Duration Amount (million) Rail Transport JICA Metro Rail Transit Line 3 Rehabilitation Project 2018–2021 ¥38,101.0 Metro Manila Subway Project (Phase 1) 2018–2025 ¥104,530.0 North–South
    [Show full text]
  • Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Volume I
    Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-annual Environmental Monitoring Report No. 1 March 2020 PHI: Malolos-Clark Railway Project – Tranche 1 Volume I September 2019 – March 2020 Prepared by the Project Management Office (PMO) of the Department of Transportation (DOTr) for the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 March 2020) Currency unit – Philippine Peso (PHP) PHP1.00 = $0.02 $1.00 = PHP50.96 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BMB – Biodiversity Management Bureau Brgy – Barangay CCA – Climate Change Adaptation CCC – Climate Change Commission CDC – Clark Development Corporation CEMP – Contractor’s Environmental Management Plan CENRO – City/Community Environment and Natural Resources Office CIA – Clark International Airport CIAC – Clark International Airport Corporation CLLEx – Central Luzon Link Expressway CLUP – Comprehensive Land Use Plan CMR – Compliance Monitoring Report CMVR – Compliance Monitoring and Validation Report CNO – Certificate of No Objection CPDO – City Planning and Development Office DAO – DENR Administrative Order DD / DED – Detailed Design Stage / Detailed Engineering Design Stage DENR – Department of Environment and Natural Resources DepEd – Department of Education DIA – Direct Impact Area DILG – Department of Interior and Local Government DOH – Department of Health DOST – Department of Science and Technology DOTr – Department of Transportation DPWH – Department of Public Works and Highways DSWD – Department of Social Welfare and Development
    [Show full text]
  • JEEP Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    JEEP bus time schedule & line map JEEP Lagro Panay welcome View In Website Mode The JEEP bus line Lagro Panay welcome has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Bristol Street / Bronson Street Intersection, Quezon City →Quezon Avenue / D Tuazon Intersection West Bound, Quezon City: 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest JEEP bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next JEEP bus arriving. Direction: Bristol Street / Bronson Street JEEP bus Time Schedule Intersection, Quezon City →Quezon Avenue / D Bristol Street / Bronson Street Intersection, Quezon Tuazon Intersection West Bound, Quezon City City →Quezon Avenue / D Tuazon Intersection West 67 stops Bound, Quezon City Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:00 AM - 10:00 PM Monday 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Bristol Street / Bronson Street Intersection, Quezon City Tuesday 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Bristol Street, Quezon City Wednesday 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Bristol, Philippines Thursday 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Regalado Highway, Quezon City Friday 12:00 AM - 11:00 PM Regalado Highway, Quezon City Saturday 12:00 AM - 10:00 PM Regalado Highway, Quezon City Regalado Highway, Quezon City JEEP bus Info Regalado Highway / Burbank Intersection Direction: Bristol Street / Bronson Street Quezon City Intersection, Quezon City →Quezon Avenue / D Tuazon Intersection West Bound, Quezon City Stops: 67 Regalado Highway, Quezon City Trip Duration: 99 min Line Summary: Bristol Street / Bronson Street Regalado Highway / Commonwealth Avenue Intersection, Quezon City, Bristol
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Philippine Cities' Initiatives
    A Case Study of Philippine Cities’ Initiatives | June – December 2017 © KCDDYangot /WWF-Philippines | Sustainable Urban Mobility — Philippine Cities’ Initiatives © IBellen / WWF-Philippines ACKNOWLEDGMENT WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organizations, with over 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 100 countries. WWF-Philippines has been working as a national organization of the WWF network since 1997. As the 26th national organization in the network, WWF-Philippines has successfully been implementing various conservation projects to help protect some of the most biologically-significant ecosystems in Asia. Our mission is to stop, and eventually reverse the accelerating degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature. The Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Case Study of Philippine Cities’ Initiatives is undertaken as part of the One Planet City Challenge (OPCC) 2017-2018 project. Project Manager: Imee S. Bellen Researcher: Karminn Cheryl Dinney Yangot WWF-Philippines acknowledges and appreciates the assistance extended to the case study by the numerous respondents and interviewees, particularly the following: Baguio City City Mayor Mauricio Domogan City Environment and Parks Management Officer, Engineer Cordelia Lacsamana City Tourism Officer, Jose Maria Rivera Department of Tourism, Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR) Regional Director Marie Venus Tan Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Associations—Baguio-Benguet-La Union (FEJODABBLU) Regional President Mr. Perfecto F. Itliong, Jr. Cebu City City Mayor Tomas Osmeña City Administrator, Engr. Nigel Paul Villarete City Environment and Natural Resources Officer, Ma. Nida Cabrera Cebu City BRT Project Manager, Atty.
    [Show full text]