DOCSLIB.ORG

NCPC Commission Meeting Transcript for February 2, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NCPC Commission Meeting Transcript for February 2, 2017 1 NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION + + + + + COMMISSION MEETING + + + + + OPEN SESSION + + + + + THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 + + + + + The meeting convened in Room 5115, Suite 500, 401 9th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004, at 1:00 p.m., Preston Bryant, Jr., Chairman, presiding. NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: L. PRESTON BRYANT, JR., Chairman Presidential Appointee EVAN CASH, Office of the Chairman of the City Council of the District of Columbia ARRINGTON DIXON, Mayoral Appointee THOMAS GALLAS, Presidential Appointee GEOFFREY GRIFFIS, Mayoral Appointee PETER MAY, Department of the Interior REBECCA NUZZI, U.S. Senate MICHAEL L. RHODES, Department of Defense JENNIFER STEINGASSER, Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia BETH WHITE, Presidential Appointee MINA WRIGHT, General Services Administration Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 2 NCPC STAFF PRESENT: MARCEL C. ACOSTA, Executive Director MATTHEW FLIS, AICP, Senior Urban Designer CARLTON HART, AICP, Urban Planner JULIA KOSTER, Secretary to the Commission VIVIAN LEE, Community Planner ANNE SCHUYLER, General Counsel ALSO PRESENT: TOM DOUGHERTY, United States Secret Service BRIGADIER GENERAL CARL RIDDELL, Eisenhower Memorial Commission JUSTON SHUBOW, The National Civic Art Society CRAIG WEBB, Gehry Partners Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 3 AGENDA Report of the Chairman . 5 Report of the Executive Director . 5 Legislative Update . 7 Consent Calendar Items . 8 4a Parcel L1 4b DC United Stadium Action Items Approval of final site development plans for phase one of the White House fence replacement. .11 Approval of comments on revised concept design . .25 Approval of final site and building plans. .73 Adjourn . .83 Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 4 1 P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S 2 1:02 p.m. 3 MR. BRYANT: Welcome, everyone, to the 4 National Capital Planning Commission. This is 5 our February 2, 2017 meeting. And if you would 6 please, stand with me and join me in the pledge 7 of allegiance. 8 (Pledge of Allegiance) 9 MR. BRYANT: For all in attendance, 10 please note that today's meeting is being live- 11 streamed on the NCPC.gov website. We do have a 12 quorum, so we will call the meeting to order, and 13 we will proceed by the agenda that has been 14 properly publicly advertised. 15 [INSERT - AGENDA] Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 5 1 REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN 2 MR. BRYANT: Agenda item number one is 3 the Report of the Chairman, and I don't have 4 anything of significance to report. 5 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6 MR. BRYANT: So agenda item number two 7 is the Report of the Executive Director who 8 always has something. 9 MR. ACOSTA: I have two things to 10 report today. First of all, I'd like to welcome 11 our guests. We have a group of undergraduate 12 students from the University of Michigan 13 architecture program who are here to do a design 14 study on memorials, so they are here to listen to 15 the Eisenhower Memorial Presentation, so we 16 welcome you to NCPC. 17 Secondly, Lee Webb recently joined our 18 organization as our historic preservation 19 specialist. He brings over 20 years of 20 experience to his work at the Advisory Council of 21 Historic Preservation, the Georgia State Historic 22 Preservation Division. He also served as a Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 6 1 preservation planner for the City of Alexandria 2 and Savannah, Georgia. 3 Lee most recently served as the 4 executive director of Thomasville Landmarks, a 5 50-year historic preservation organization in 6 Georgia, so welcome to you, Lee. So that 7 concludes my presentation. You do have a 8 written report before you. 9 [INSERT - REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR] Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 7 1 MR. BRYANT: Yes, thank you, Mr. 2 Acosta. 3 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 4 MR. BRYANT: Agenda item number three 5 is the legislative update, General Counsel, Ms. 6 Schuyler. 7 MS. SCHUYLER: Thank you, Mr. 8 Chairman. I do have one item on which I'd like 9 to report. It is a bill, HR216, called the 10 Second Division Memorial Modification Act, which 11 was introduced in the House on January 3 of this 12 year. It's been referred to the House Committee 13 on Natural Resources. 14 The bill authorizes - this is a very 15 long name for a sponsor - the Scholarship and 16 Memorials Foundation of the Second Indian Head 17 Division Association to place three benches at 18 the second division memorial located in 19 President's Park bordering Constitution near 17th 20 Street NW. 21 The benches honor members of the 22 Second Infantry Division killed in the Cold War Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 8 1 in Korea, the War in Iraq, and the War in 2 Afghanistan. 3 The bill specifically holds that the 4 design and placement of the benches shall be 5 governed by the requirements of the Commemorative 6 Works Act, so this commission will be called upon 7 to review it if passed and enacted into law. 8 MR. BRYANT: Thank you. Any questions 9 for Ms. Schuyler? 10 CONSENT CALENDAR 11 MR. BRYANT: Agenda Item Number Four 12 is the consent calendar, and we have only two 13 items. Item 4A is for comments on the 35 percent 14 site and building plans for Parcel L1 at the 15 Southeast Federal Center. That's brought to us 16 by the General Services Administration. 17 And Agenda Item 4B is the approval of 18 preliminary and final site building plans with 19 comments for the D.C. United Stadium located in 20 Southwest Washington submitted to us by D.C. 21 United in coordination with the District of 22 Columbia Department of General Services. Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 9 1 If there are no questions, is there a 2 motion on the consent calendar? 3 MR. DIXON: So moved. 4 MR. BRYANT: It's been moved and - 5 MS. WHITE: Second. 6 MR. BRYANT: - seconded. All in favor 7 of the consent calendar, say, "Aye." 8 PARTICIPANTS: Aye. 9 MR. BRYANT: Opposed no? It carries. 10 [INSERT - SOUTHEAST FEDERAL CENTER] Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 10 1 [INSERT - DC UNITED STADIUM] Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 11 1 ACTION ITEM 5A 2 WHITE HOUSE FENCE REPLACEMENT 3 MR. BRYANT: Agenda Item Number 5A is 4 approval of the final site and development plans 5 for phase one of the White House fence 6 replacement. We previously reviewed the concept 7 and preliminary plans in July and December 8 respectively in 2016. 9 Mr. Flis, welcome. 10 MR. FLIS: Yes, good afternoon, Mr. 11 Chairman and members of the Commission. The 12 National Park Service in cooperation with the 13 United States Secret Service has submitted final 14 site development plans for phase one of the new 15 perimeter fence and gates at the White House 16 complex. 17 As you know, the Commission provided 18 preliminary approval of the project back in 19 December, with comments and recommendations which 20 have helped to guide further refinement of the 21 plans. 22 The White House, as you know, is the Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 12 1 Executive Office of the President and also the 2 primary residence of the First Family. It is 3 located in downtown Washington, D.C. between 4 Pennsylvania Avenue, E Street, 15th, and 17th 5 Streets NW. 6 The current location of the White 7 House fence is outlined here in yellow on the 8 screen in front of you, and it encloses 9 approximately 18 acres. 10 The White House complex is just one 11 component of the larger President's Park which is 12 outlined here in white, which also includes 13 Lafayette Park, the Eisenhower Executive Office 14 Building, the Treasury Building, as well as the 15 Ellipse which is located to the south. 16 This is a more detailed site plan of 17 the White House complex and surrounding 18 buildings. The Commission again is today 19 considering a new perimeter fence and gates as 20 the first phase of a comprehensive security plan. 21 A future phase will also look at the Eisenhower 22 Executive Office Building as well as the Treasury Neal R. Gross and Co., Inc. (202) 234-4433 Washington DC www.nealrgross.com 13 1 Building. 2 The White House has actually had a low 3 wall or fence since around 1803, and over time, 4 it has continued to evolve, eventually reaching 5 the form which you would recognize on the site 6 today. 7 Of course, the White House is a major 8 visitor destination, and the house itself and the 9 grounds are also viewed and experienced through 10 the fence from a variety of perspectives. As 11 such, staff has evaluated the proposed fence and 12 gates based upon a number of considerations 13 including historic preservation, urban design, as 14 well as visitor experience. 15 As I have mentioned, this project is 16 the first phase of security improvements that 17 will eventually include other portions of 18 President's Park, including the Treasury Building 19 and Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which 20 are shown on the screen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 NCBJ Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. - Early Ideas Regarding Extracurricular Activities for Attendees and Guests to Consider
    2019 NCBJ Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. - Early Ideas Regarding Extracurricular Activities for Attendees and Guests to Consider There are so many things to do when visiting D.C., many for free, and here are a few you may have not done before. They may make it worthwhile to come to D.C. early or to stay to the end of the weekend. Getting to the Sites: • D.C. Sites and the Pentagon: Metro is a way around town. The hotel is four minutes from the Metro’s Mt. Vernon Square/7th St.-Convention Center Station. Using Metro or walking, or a combination of the two (or a taxi cab) most D.C. sites and the Pentagon are within 30 minutes or less from the hotel.1 Googlemaps can help you find the relevant Metro line to use. Circulator buses, running every 10 minutes, are an inexpensive way to travel to and around popular destinations. Routes include: the Georgetown-Union Station route (with a stop at 9th and New York Avenue, NW, a block from the hotel); and the National Mall route starting at nearby Union Station. • The Mall in particular. Many sites are on or near the Mall, a five-minute cab ride or 17-minute walk from the hotel going straight down 9th Street. See map of Mall. However, the Mall is huge: the Mall museums discussed start at 3d Street and end at 14th Street, and from 3d Street to 14th Street is an 18-minute walk; and the monuments on the Mall are located beyond 14th Street, ending at the Lincoln Memorial at 23d Street.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Washington
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2009 Washington Monument Grounds Washington Monument Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Washington Monument Grounds Washington Monument Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition,
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of the National Mall
    The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri­ can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol­ lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver­ mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening
    NATIONAL PARK U.S. Department of the Interior SERVICE National Park Service Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening E N V I R O N M E N T A L A S S E S S ME N T July 2013 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS WASHINGTON, D.C. Washington Monument Visitor Security Screening National Mall and Memorial Parks ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT July, 2013 [This page intentionally left blank.] PROJECT SUMMARY The National Park Service (NPS), in cooperation with the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate a range of alternatives for the enhancement and improvement of the visitor screening at the Washington Monument (the Monument) in Washington, D.C. The National Mall is a highly recognizable space and one of the most significant historic landscapes in the United States, extending east to west from the U.S. Capitol building to the Potomac River and north to south from Constitution Avenue, NW to the Thomas Jefferson Memorial. The Washington Monument is the central point of the National Mall, placed at the intersection of two significant axes between the U.S. Capitol and the Lincoln Memorial to the east-west and the White House to the Jefferson Memorial to the north-south. The Washington Monument is made up of a stone masonry obelisk set within a circular granite plaza and flanked by large turf expanses. As the primary memorial to the nation’s first president, the Monument is one of the most prominent icons in the nation and is toured by approximately one million visitors annually with millions more visiting the surrounding grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • World Congress of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Perioperative Medicine
    World Congress of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Perioperative Medicine PRELIMINARY PROGRAM WASHINGTON DC – USA May 9 – 12, 2015 www.erassociety.org www.ebpom.org A COLLABORATION BETWEEN ASER (American Society for Enhanced Recovery) - hosting ERAS Society - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society and EBPOM - Evidence Based PeriOperative Medicine Congress Organizers & Committee Members TJ Gan, M.D., USA. Congress President Olle Ljungqvist, Sweden, Chairman ERAS Society Timothy Miller, USA Ken Fearon, UK - Secretary Julie Thacker, USA Nicolas Demartines, Switzerland - Treasurer Roy Soto, USA Dileep Lobo, UK - Scientific Chairman Mike Scott, UK - Educational Chairman Monty Mythen, UK, Chairman EBPOM Bill Fawcett, UK Mark Hamilton, UK Dorthe Hjort, Denmark - Nurses section Mike Grocott, UK Franco Carli, Canada Scott Brudney, USA Tonia Young-Fadok, USA Important Dates & Deadlines REGISTRATION FEE & HOTEL RESERVATION • Opening of the online registration December 15, 2014 • Deadline for early registration fee March 4, 2015 • Cancellation registration with fee until April 8, 2015 • Non refundable registration fee April 9, 2015 • Cancellation Hotel – no fee until April 1, 2015 • Non refundable Hotel – 1st night deposit April 2, 2015 ABSTRACTS • Opening of abstract submission December 1, 2014 • Closing of abstract submission January 31, 2015 • Notifications to submitters February 15, 2015 • Abstract on website April 15, 2015 Preliminary 2 Program 3 Societies gathered for a Unique Congress ASER The American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) was officially founded in 2014. It is a non-profit organization with an international membership, which is dedicated to promote the practice of enhanced recovery in the perioperative patients through education and research. ASER’s mission is to advance the practice of perioperative enhanced recovery, to contribute to its growth and influences, by fostering and encouraging research, education, public policy discussion and scientific progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Monument GPS Pr O J E
    January 2000 Vol. 20, Number 1 Washington Monument publication GPS Pro j e c t David R. Doyle ABOVE Tip of the Washington Monu- ike the pyramids of Egypt, the Eiffel was halted in 1854, when ment with the Mall LTower, the Parthenon, or the temples members of the “Know- and the Capitol in of Ankor Wat, the Washington Monument Nothing Party” gained the background. The tip is made of in Washington D.C. is truly a monument co n t r ol of the Society and aluminum and the that commands universal re c o g n i t i o n . financial contributions brass bracket sur- This marvel of 19th century engineering f rom private donors rounding it nor- is a symbol of national pride, democratic stopped. A frustrated mally has a light- principals, cultural variety, social struggle Pr esident Grant persuad- ing rod affixed at and political freedom. The monument is ed the Society to donate each corner. When now also one of the most important ele- the project to the country the Monument was ments of the National Spatial Reference in 1876, and construction built, one of the System (NSRS) maintained by the Nation- was restarted in 1878, un- States donated al Geodetic Survey (NGS), an agency of der the direction of the two aluminum tips. At the time, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric U.S. Army Corps of Engi- aluminum was Administration’s (NOAA), National neers. The external struc- more valuable Ocean Service (NOS). Standing approxi- tu r e was completed in than gold. mately 555 feet 5 inches, the Monument 1884, and finally opened is the tallest structure in Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Roznowski [email protected] Finding Resources
    Give Your Classes a Global Perspective https://clipartfest.com/ Jim Roznowski [email protected] Finding resources For information on the 2014 Geography Assessment visit the website: The Nation’s Report Card https://nationsreportcard.gov/hgc_2014/#geography For current world maps, visit the website: Contemporary Maps of the World http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/contemporarymaps/world/world/ Wikipedia: List of cities by longitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_longitude Scale drawings and photos of many monuments on the National Mall along with the White House are available on the web site of the Library of Congress in the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record/Historic American Landscapes Survey. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/hh/ Type the name of the monument in the “Search This Collection” box. Scale drawings of the White House: images 14, 15, and 42-81 Lincoln Memorial: images 122-149 Vietnam Veterans Memorial: images 10-30 Capitol: images 79-92, 122-131, 153-162 Smithsonian Institution: images 9-89 Washington Monument: images 39, 59, 236-272 Jefferson Memorial: images 15-40 Additional information about sites in DC is also available at • The National Park Service – http://www.nps.gov • National Coalition to Save Our Mall (includes the complete 1902 McMillian Commission Report) – http://www.savethemall.org/ • A View On Cities – http://www.aviewoncities.com/washington/mall.htm For more information about the mathematics of The Ellipse and information on quadrarcs, check out The Shape and History of the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. by Clark Kimberling http://faculty.evansville.edu/ck6/ellipse.pdf The Architecture Week Great Buildings Collection http://www.GreatBuildings.com/gbc.html Excellent book with information on the Sydney Opera House and the mathematics of other buildings Mathematical Excursions to the World’s Great Buildings, Alexander J Hahn, Princeton University Press Arc Length The following three cities are located approximately on longitude 30° E.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: SUB CULTURAL RIFT: AN
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: SUB CULTURAL RIFT: AN AFFIRMATION ON AMERICAN SOCIAL CONFLICT Kevin Garzon, Master of Architecture, 2018 Thesis Directed By: Professor, Ming Hu, School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation Whether in equilibrium or imbalance, social conflict is inherent in any dynamic society, particularly in American culture. More recently it is apparent that social conflict in America is entering a phase of uncompromising imbalance where ideological differences between opposing social entities and their actions have created a noticeable ‘rift’ within the American strata. As a perpetual force, conflict is part of the social fabric that creates a dynamic society, however the effects created by any internal conflict can be extremely detrimental to entities on either side, more importantly to the society in its entirety. The result is an open wound in the social realm of the American culture that is being further contaminated. This thesis looks to materialize American social conflict in the form of an inhabitable monument by means of externalized social experiences to promote National awareness. It will seek to acknowledge the current state of American social strife and the underlying issues prevalent in the American social construct. Socially driven architecture will provide a stark reality regarding underlying American social issues for the public to reflect and meditate on the realities of modern America as well as their own lives as they begin to identify with those afflicted. SUB CULTURAL RIFT: AN AFFIRMATION ON AMERICAN SOCIAL CONFLICT by Kevin Garzon Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture 2018 Advisory Committee: Ming Hu, Chair Karl Dupuy, Committee Member Hooman Koliji, Committee Member © Copyright by Kevin Garzon 2018 Acknowledgements Those afflicted.
    [Show full text]
  • WAMO Press Release FINAL Pdf 020711
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: James P. Clark, AIA 703-524-6616 or Ellen Goldstein 202-253-5694 National Ideas Competition for the Washington Monument Grounds www.wamocompetition.org Jury Chooses 24 Bold Ideas for Washington Monument Competition February 7, 2011 Washington, DC -- A sustainable meadow, pinpoints of light dotting the landscape, a sunken amphitheater suitable for performances and sporting events, and an underground museum space were among the twenty-four ideas selected January 28th from hundreds of entries to the National Ideas Competition for the Washington Monument Grounds. Over 500 participants from across the U.S. and around the world submitted their ideas. The jury of seven included distinguished designers, historians, a Washington cultural leader, and a futurist. Many of the winning entries offered subtle, minimal interventions that used shadows, low plantings, and contemplative messages, while others proposed major projects calling for cuts into the landscape to create a more welcoming and educational environment for visitors. More than half of the winning ideas proposed ways to highlight the historically important but overlooked Jefferson Pier that marks the original intended site for the Washington Monument, at the intersection of a line from the Capitol and another from the White House. Many entries tried to reinforce the geometries intended by L’Enfant and the 1902 McMillan Commission’s plans for the grounds of the Monument. Other winners included dramatic new landscape treatments inspired by the historical ecology of this land that was once the shoreline of the Potomac River and Tiber Creek. “We were looking for intriguing ideas that also captured the special quality of this public open space in the center of the National Mall, and in some cases the best ideas were presented very simply, capturing a thoughtful approach to history and meaning with a compelling design statement or conceptual sketch,” said jury chair Raymond Gastil, renowned city planner.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs of the 2009 Presidential Inauguration
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Mall and Memorial Parks Washington, D.C. Photographs of the 2009 Presidential Inauguration CONTENTS The 2009 Presidential Inauguration ........................................................................................... 1 The Pre-Inaugural Celebration — January 18, 2009............................................................ 1 The Inauguration — January 20, 2009 ............................................................................... 3 The Cleanup ...................................................................................................................... 9 Pre-inaugural ceremonies took place Sunday, January 18, at the Lincoln Memorial. The inaugural ceremony took place Tuesday, January 20, at the U.S. Capitol. Photographs are courtesy of the National Park Service, Office of Public Affairs. Photographs were taken by Terry Adams, Chris Alford, David Barna, Dana Dierkes, Laura Illige, and Paul Ollige. THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION THE PRE-INAUGURAL CELEBRATION — JANUARY 18, 2009 1 THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION 2 The Inauguration — January 20, 2009 THE INAUGURATION — JANUARY 20, 2009 3 THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION 4 The Inauguration — January 20, 2009 5 THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION 6 The Inauguration — January 20, 2009 The use of jumbotrons allowed hundreds of thousands of visitors to see the inauguration at various locations throughout the National Mall. 7 THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION 8 The Cleanup THE CLEANUP The Mall on
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Monument Grounds Historic District Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Washington Monument and Grounds Historic District (Additional Documentation, 2016) other names/site number 2. Location street & number 14th Street NW between Constitution and Independence Avenues not for publication [Washington Monument, National Mall and Memorial Parks] city or town Washington vicinity state DC code DC county code 001 zip code 20004 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: X national statewide X local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • University Reporter University Publications and Campus Newsletters
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston 1996-2009, University Reporter University Publications and Campus Newsletters 2-1-2008 University Reporter - Volume 12, Number 06 - February 2008 Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/university_reporter Recommended Citation "University Reporter - Volume 12, Number 06 - February 2008" (2008). 1996-2009, University Reporter. Paper 15. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/university_reporter/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications and Campus Newsletters at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996-2009, University Reporter by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. N E W S A N D I N FORMAT I O N A B O U T T H E U ni VERS I T Y O F M ASSACHUSETTS B OSTO N THE UNIVERSI T Y ReporterVolume 12, Number 6 February 2008 Siperstein Wins President’s Public Service Award By William Wright “This is the tenth anniversary UMass Board of Trustees chair- Professor Gary N. Siperstein, of the university’s President’s Pub- man Robert J. Manning said of founder and director of the Cen- lic Service Awards and this year’s this year’s award winners, “These ter for Social Development and winners continue in the impres- individuals and their campus col- Education at UMass Boston, has sive tradition of the earlier win- leagues are the key to what makes been named one of six recipients ners,” said UMass President Jack the University of Massachusetts of the 2007 President’s Public M.
    [Show full text]