Open a -Chandra Final Thesis.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open a -Chandra Final Thesis.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Crop and Soil Sciences PARASITIC CASTRATION BY A STINKING SMUT REGULATES SEX DETERMINATION AND INFLORESCENCE ARCHITECTURE IN DIOECIOUS BUFFALOGRASS A Thesis in Agronomy by Ambika Chandra © 2007 Ambika Chandra Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2007 The thesis of Ambika Chandra has been reviewed and approved* by the following: David R. Huff Associate Professor of Turfgrass Breeding and Genetics Thesis Adviser Chair of Committee Dawn S. Luthe Professor of Plant Stress Biology Barbara J.Christ Professor and Head of Plant Pathology Paula McSteen Assistant Professor of Biology David M. Sylvia Professor of Soil Microbiology Head of the Department of Department of Crop and Soil Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii ABSTRACT PARASITIC CASTRATION BY A STINKING SMUT REGULATES SEX DETERMINATION AND INFLORESCENCE ARCHITECTURE IN DIOECIOUS BUFFALOGRASS Buffalograss is a dioecious grass with male and female inflorescences separated onto two different individuals. Buffalograss presumably evolved its present day dioecious breeding system from hermaphroditic ancestors. Pistil smut infection phenotypically alters unisexual florets of dimorphic male and female buffalograss making them hermaphrodites which are morphologically indistinguishable from one another. In this way, pistil smut infection allows the phenotypic expression of a hermaphroditic ancestor, which existed back in time, in the form of a retrospective phenotype or simply a retrophenotype. Underdeveloped stamens (male sex organs) and fungal sporulation within ovaries of male and female plants renders hermaphroditic florets of infected buffalograss reproductively sterile, i.e. parasitically castrated. Parasitic castration is a disease affecting animals, mollusks, insects, and plants where host gonads are sterilized preventing evolution of host resistance and redirecting resource allocation. How and why fungi induce hermaphroditism and cause parasitic castration in their hosts is unknown. Here I show that pistil smut induces hermaphroditism in male buffalograss by down- regulating a female suppressor gene homologous to Tasselseed2 (Ts2). This molecular mechanism is supported by temporal and spatial expression analyses performed using quantitative real time PCR and in situ hybridization, respectively, on a cloned full length buffalograss Ts2 homolog. In addition to inducing hermaphroditism, pistil smut infection iii enhances overall sexual reproductive allocation (SRA) in both male and female sex forms of buffalograss. In female plants, the fungus induces a 12.6-fold increase in ovary production while in male plants the fungus induces a 2.3-fold increase in floret number. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses of morphology and nuclear 28s large subunit of ribosomal DNA (nLSU-rDNA) sequences show that pistil smut is clearly distinct from any other species of Tilletia suggesting that it may not even be a species of Tilletia. The unusually large genetic distance of pistil smut from Tilletia clade indicates an accelerated rate of evolution possibly due to pistil smut’s long term coevolutionary struggle with its host culminating in induced hermaphroditism. Therefore, a new genus Salmacisia is proposed and described to accommodate pistil smut. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................viiii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................x Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................13 Chapter 2 LIFE CYCLE AND PHYLOGENY OF TILLETIA BUCHLOËANA; A FUNGAL PARASITE CAUSING INDUCED HERMAPHRODITISM IN DIOECIOUS BUFFALOGRASS (BUCHLOË DACTYLOIDES).......................................................................................19 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................19 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................20 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................23 Isolation and maintenance of pistil smut................................................23 Host infection by pistil smut ..................................................................23 Scoring and analysis of pistil smut morphology ....................................24 Nucleic acid extraction and PCR amplification .....................................24 Taxa examined for phylogenetic analyses .............................................25 Taxa sequence alignments......................................................................26 Phylogenetic analyses ............................................................................27 RESULTS......................................................................................................29 Induced hermaphroditism and parasitic castration of buffalograss by pistil smut........................................................................................29 Morphological characteristics of pistil smut fungus in vitro..................31 Life cycle of pistil smut in vivo .............................................................32 Phylogenetic analysis of pistil smut based on morphology and life cycle characteristics ........................................................................33 Phylogenetic placement of pistil smut based on nLSU and ITS sequence analyses ...........................................................................35 ITS...................................................................................................39 Gamma distribution.........................................................................39 DISCUSSION................................................................................................40 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................45 Chapter 3 SALMACISIA, A NEW GENUS OF TILLETIALES: RECLASSIFICATION OF TILLETIA BUCHLOËANA CAUSING INDUCED HERMAPHRODITISM IN BUFFALOGRASS......................................................................................................62 TAXONOMY................................................................................................63 Salmacisia D. R. Huff & A. Chandra, gen. nov. ....................................63 v Sori..................................................................................................63 Type species ....................................................................................63 Etymology........................................................................................64 Salmacisia buchloëana (Kellerman & Swingle) D. R. Huff & A. Chandra comb. nov. ........................................................................64 Sori..................................................................................................65 Characteristic DNA sequences .......................................................65 Characteristic fixed DNA polymorphisms ......................................66 Specimen examined .........................................................................67 Known distribution..........................................................................67 Chapter 4 INDUCED HERMAPHRODITISM CAUSED BY PARASITIC CASTRATION DISPLAYS AN ANCESTRAL PHENOTYPE BY REMOVING A SEX DETERMINING ONTOGENETIC LAYER FROM DIOECIOUS BUFFALOGRASS........................................69 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................69 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................69 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................74 Plant Material .........................................................................................74 Morphological stages of buffalograss inflorescence development ........74 Scanning Electron Microscopy ..............................................................74 Isolation of full length Ts2 homolog (BdTs2) from buffalograss..........75 Quantitative Real-Time PCR .................................................................76 RNA in situ hybridization ......................................................................77 RESULTS......................................................................................................78 DISCUSSION................................................................................................82 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................85 Chapter 5 TEN-FOLD INCREASE IN POTENTIAL SEED YIELD DUE TO FUNGAL INFECTION OF BUFFALOGRASS ...............................................................................99 ABSTRACT: .................................................................................................99 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................99 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................102 Isolation of pistil smut............................................................................102 Plant
Recommended publications
  • Axpcoords & Parallel Axparafit: Statistical Co-Phylogenetic Analyses
    BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Software Open Access AxPcoords & parallel AxParafit: statistical co-phylogenetic analyses on thousands of taxa Alexandros Stamatakis*1,2, Alexander F Auch3, Jan Meier-Kolthoff3 and Markus Göker4 Address: 1École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, School of Computer & Communication Sciences, Laboratory for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics STATION 14, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 3Center for Bioinformatics (ZBIT), Sand 14, Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Germany and 4Organismic Botany/Mycology, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Germany Email: Alexandros Stamatakis* - [email protected]; Alexander F Auch - [email protected]; Jan Meier- Kolthoff - [email protected]; Markus Göker - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 22 October 2007 Received: 26 June 2007 Accepted: 22 October 2007 BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:405 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-405 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/405 © 2007 Stamatakis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Current tools for Co-phylogenetic analyses are not able to cope with the continuous accumulation of phylogenetic data. The sophisticated statistical test for host-parasite co-phylogenetic analyses implemented in Parafit does not allow it to handle large datasets in reasonable times. The Parafit and DistPCoA programs are the by far most compute-intensive components of the Parafit analysis pipeline.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Tilletia Indica</I>
    ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 4 ENG DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in January 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 2 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Examination of seeds/grain ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Extraction of teliospores from seeds/grain, size-selective sieve wash test ....................... 3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Morphology of teliospores ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Morphological
    [Show full text]
  • Mykologie in Tübingen 1974-2011
    Mykologie am Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie der Universität Tübingen, 1974-2011 FRANZ OBERWINKLER Kurzfassung Wir beschreiben die mykologischen Forschungsaktivitäten am ehemaligen Lehrstuhl „Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie“ der Universität Tübingen von 1974 bis 2011 und ihrer internationalen Ausstrahlung. Leitschiene unseres gemeinsamen mykologischen Forschungskonzeptes war die Verknüpfung von Gelände- mit Laborarbeiten sowie von Forschung mit Lehre. Dieses Konzept spiegelte sich in einem weit gefächerten Lehrangebot, das insbesondere den Pflanzen als dem Hauptsubstrat der Pilze breiten Raum gab. Lichtmikroskopische Untersuchungen der zellulären Baupläne von Pilzen bildeten das Fundament für unsere Arbeiten: Identifikationen, Ontogeniestudien, Vergleiche von Mikromorphologien, Überprüfen von Kulturen, Präparateauswahl für Elektronenmikroskopie, etc. Bereits an diesen Beispielen wird die Methodenvernetzung erkennbar. In dem zu besprechenden Zeitraum wurden Ultrastrukturuntersuchungen und Nukleinsäuresequenzierungen als revolutionierende Methoden für den täglichen Laborbetrieb verfügbar. Flankiert wurden diese Neuerungen durch ständig verbesserte Datenaufbereitungen und Auswertungsprogramme für Computer. Zusammen mit den traditionellen Anwendungen der Lichtmikroskopie und der Kultivierung von Pilzen stand somit ein effizientes Methodenspektrum zur Verfügung, das für systematische, phylogenetische und ökologische Fragestellungen gleichermaßen eingesetzt werden konnte, insbesondere in der Antibiotikaforschung, beim Studium zellulärer
    [Show full text]
  • Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: a Flora of Southwestern Arizona
    Felger, R.S., S. Rutman, and J. Malusa. 2014. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A flora of southwestern Arizona. Part 6. Poaceae – grass family. Phytoneuron 2014-35: 1–139. Published 17 March 2014. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA OF SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA Part 6. POACEAE – GRASS FAMILY RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 & Sky Island Alliance P.O. Box 41165, Tucson, Arizona 85717 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 JIM MALUSA School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] ABSTRACT A floristic account is provided for the grass family as part of the vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona. This is the second largest family in the flora area after Asteraceae. A total of 97 taxa in 46 genera of grasses are included in this publication, which includes ones established and reproducing in the modern flora (86 taxa in 43 genera), some occurring at the margins of the flora area or no long known from the area, and ice age fossils. At least 28 taxa are known by fossils recovered from packrat middens, five of which have not been found in the modern flora: little barley ( Hordeum pusillum ), cliff muhly ( Muhlenbergia polycaulis ), Paspalum sp., mutton bluegrass ( Poa fendleriana ), and bulb panic grass ( Zuloagaea bulbosa ). Non-native grasses are represented by 27 species, or 28% of the modern grass flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service
    Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Daniel G. Milchunas General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-169 April 2006 Milchunas, Daniel G. 2006. Responses of plant communities to grazing in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-169. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p. Abstract Grazing by wild and domestic mammals can have small to large effects on plant communities, depend- ing on characteristics of the particular community and of the type and intensity of grazing. The broad objective of this report was to extensively review literature on the effects of grazing on 25 plant commu- nities of the southwestern U.S. in terms of plant species composition, aboveground primary productiv- ity, and root and soil attributes. Livestock grazing management and grazing systems are assessed, as are effects of small and large native mammals and feral species, when data are available. Emphasis is placed on the evolutionary history of grazing and productivity of the particular communities as deter- minants of response. After reviewing available studies for each community type, we compare changes in species composition with grazing among community types. Comparisons are also made between southwestern communities with a relatively short history of grazing and communities of the adjacent Great Plains with a long evolutionary history of grazing. Evidence for grazing as a factor in shifts from grasslands to shrublands is considered. An appendix outlines a new community classification system, which is followed in describing grazing impacts in prior sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2013 Rare Plants on Display by Chet Neufeld NPSS Executive Director the NPSS Has Once Again Been Busy with Field Tours
    Vol. 18, No. 2 /npss.sk www.npss.sk.ca @NPSS_SK Summer 2013 Rare plants on display By CHET NEUFELD NPSS Executive Director The NPSS has once again been busy with field tours. While the weather didn’t always cooperate, we managed to have some good times and find a lot of interesting and rare plants. Here’s a break- down of the tours for 2013. Peggy McKercher Conservation Area Tour - May 25 The summer tour schedule started out with a tour to the Peggy McKercher Conservation Area on the outskirts of Saskatoon. This is an area in transition; it has recently been acquired by the Meewasin Valley Author- ity but had been a Catholic Church retreat for a number of years. As such, there was a mix of introduced and native plants, and signs of human use which will be remediated as the site is brought back to a more natural state. Continued on Pages 4, 5 & 6 PHOTOS BY CANDACE AND CHET NEUFELD ABOVE – Woolly gromwell (Lithospermum ruderale) found during the Southwest Corner Tour in Cypress Hills on June 22 and 23. RIGHT – Smooth Cliffbrake (Pellaea glabella ssp. occidentalis) found in the Cypress Hills, a new location for Saskatchewan. NPSS could Getting to NatureCity Holts win Spot use a few good the root of an Festival draws the Crocus 2 board members 3 invasive problem 7 1,200 people 8 contest, again 1 In search of a NPSS Board of Directors President: few good plants, Shelley Heidinger 306-634-9771 Past-President Tara Sample 306-777-9137 Vice-President: board members John Hauer 306-463-5507 I hope that everyone enjoyed their summer! So far at least.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Whole Genome Sequence Data to Characterize Mating and Rna
    USE OF WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCE DATA TO CHARACTERIZE MATING AND RNA SILENCING GENES IN TILLETIA SPECIES By SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PLANT PATHOLOGY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Plant Pathology DECEMBER 2014 © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Lori M. Carris, Ph.D., Chair Dorrie Main, Ph.D. Patricia Okubara, Ph.D. Lisa A. Castlebury, Ph. D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research presented in this thesis could not have been carried out without the expertise and cooperation of others in the scientific community. Significant contributions were made by colleagues here at Washington State University, at the United States Department of Agriculture and at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. I would like to start by thanking my committee members Dr. Lori Carris, Dr. Lisa Castlebury, Dr. Pat Okubara and Dr. Dorrie Main, who provided guidance on procedure, feedback on my research as well as contacts and laboratory resources. Dr. André Lévesque of AAFC initially alerted me to the prospect of collaboration with other AAFC Tilletia researchers and placed me in contact with Dr. Sarah Hambleton, whose lab sequenced four out of five strains of Tilletia used in this study (CSSP CRTI 09-462RD). Dr. Prasad Kesanakurti and Jeff Cullis coordinated my access to AAFC’s genome and transcriptome data for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Water Native Plants for Colorado Gardens: Prairie and Plains
    Low-Water Native Plants for Colorado Gardens: Prairie and Plains Published by the Colorado Native Plant Society 1 Prairie and Plains Region Denver Botanic Gardens, Chatfield Photo by Irene Shonle Introduction This range map is approximate. Please be familiar with your area to know which This is one in a series of regional native planting guides that are a booklet is most appropriate for your landscape. collaboration of the Colorado Native Plant Society, CSU Extension, Front Range Wild Ones, the High Plains Environmental Center, Butterfly The Colorado native plant gardening guides cover these 5 regions: Pavilion and the Denver Botanic Gardens. Plains/Prairie Front Range/Foothills Many people have an interest in landscaping with native plants, Southeastern Colorado and the purpose of this booklet is to help people make the most Mountains above 7,500 feet successful choices. We have divided the state into 5 different regions Lower Elevation Western Slope that reflect different growing conditions and life zones. These are: the plains/prairie, Southeastern Colorado, the Front Range/foothills, the This publication was written by the Colorado Native Plant Society Gardening mountains above 7,500’, and lower elevation Western Slope. Find the Guide Committee: Committee Chair, Irene Shonle, Director, CSU Extension, area that most closely resembles your proposed garden site for the Gilpin County; Nick Daniel, Horticulturist, Denver Botanic Gardens; Deryn best gardening recommendations. Davidson, Horticulture Agent, CSU Extension, Boulder County; Susan Crick, Front Range Chapter, Wild Ones; Jim Tolstrup, Executive Director, High Plains Why Native? Environmental Center (HPEC); Jan Loechell Turner, Colorado Native Plant There are many benefits to using Colorado native plants for home Society (CoNPS); Amy Yarger, Director of Horticulture, Butterfly Pavilion.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnal Bunt of Wheat in India and Its Management: a Review Article
    Plant Pathology & Quarantine 7(2): 165–173 (2017) ISSN 2229-2217 www.ppqjournal.org Article Doi 10.5943/ppq/7/2/10 Copyright © Mushroom Research Foundation Karnal bunt of wheat in India and its management: a review Sharma A1*, Sharma P1, Dixit A2 and Tyagi R3 1Department of Zoology, Stani Memorial PG College, Jaipur-302020, India 2Department of Zoology, St. Xavier's College, Nevta, Jaipur-302029, India 3Department of Biotechnology, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur-302017, India Sharma A, Sharma P, Dixit A, Tyagi R 2017 – Karnal bunt of wheat in India and its management: a review. Plant Pathology & Quarantine 7(2), 165–173, Doi 10.5943/ppq/7/2/10 Abstract Wheat has been a source of staple food to mankind since ancient times. Decreased production of wheat in the major wheat growing countries may be attributed to prevalence of Karnal bunt disease. The major impact of Karnal bunt is yield reduction and a decrease in quality of grains by imparting a fishy odour and taste to the wheat. The disease has gained significant importance due to the fact that it is prevalent only in a few countries around the world. The pathogen Tilletia indica is soil and seed borne which pose a serious quarantine problem and thus interferes with wheat trade. Early recognition of the pathogen is a critical step in analysis and its management. The present review highlights a brief outline of the pathogen, symptoms and various methods like seed treatment, crop rotation, fungicide application etc. for the control of Karnal bunt disease. Keywords – disease – fungicide – pathogen – Tilletia indica – quarantine Introduction Agriculture plays a vital role in the economy and stability of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative Key and Descriptions
    Hagenbuch, K.W. and D.E. Lemke. 2015. Grasses of the Texas Hill Country: Vegetative key and descriptions. Phytoneuron 2015-4: 1–93. Published 7 January 2015. ISSN 2153 733X GRASSES OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY: VEGETATIVE KEY AND DESCRIPTIONS KARL W. HAGENBUCH Department of Biological Sciences San Antonio College 1300 San Pedro Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212-4299 [email protected] DAVID E. LEMKE Department of Biology Texas State University 601 University Drive San Marcos, Texas 78666-4684 [email protected] ABSTRACT A key and a set of descriptions, based solely on vegetative characteristics, is provided for the identification of 66 genera and 160 grass species, both native and naturalized, of the Texas Hill Country. The principal characters used (features of longevity, growth form, roots, rhizomes and stolons, culms, leaf sheaths, collars, auricles, ligules, leaf blades, vernation, vestiture, and habitat) are discussed and illustrated. This treatment should prove useful at times when reproductive material is not available. Because of its size and variation in environmental conditions, Texas provides habitat for well over 700 species of grasses (Shaw 2012). For identification purposes, the works of Correll and Johnston (1970); Gould (1975) and, more recently, Shaw (2012) treat Texas grasses in their entirety. In addition to these comprehensive works, regional taxonomic treatments have been done for the grasses of the Cross Timbers and Prairies (Hignight et al. 1988), the South Texas Brush Country (Lonard 1993; Everitt et al. 2011), the Gulf Prairies and Marshes (Hatch et al. 1999), and the Trans-Pecos (Powell 1994) natural regions. In these, as well as in numerous other manuals and keys, accurate identification of grass species depends on the availability of reproductive material.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    ROOT CHARACTERISTICS OF WARM SEASON TURFGRASS SPECIES UNDER LIMITED SOIL WATER AND VARYING MOWING HEIGHTS By BISHOW PRAKASH POUDEL DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Bishow P. Poudel Dedicated to my family and all the earthquake victims of Nepal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisers Dr. Diane Rowland and Dr. Kevin Kenworthy and the supervisory committee for their continuous support and help throughout the program. My sincere acknowledgement goes to Andy Schreffler for his help with root images collections throughout the study period. Sincere thanks goes to Dr. Patricio Munoz and James Colee for their help with statistical analysis. Similarly I would also like to acknowledge my lab mates, colleague and friends for their help and support. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ 12 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... 14 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]