Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Utah Valley Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Utah Valley Utah Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Utah Valley Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 257-B Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Utah Valley Utah By HAROLD J. BISSELL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 257-B Stratigraphy, origin, and engineering properties of the unconsolidated deposits of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract..._ _ _ _____________ _ ___________________ 101 Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 101 Quaternary deposits in southern Utah Valley—Con. Field methods_______ ______ _________________ 101 Younger deposits_-____---_-----_-_--------- 121 Previous studies__ — _ — — _______________________ 102 Post-Provo eolian sand and silt-__________ 121 Acknowledgments_____________________________ 103 Late and post-Provo, pre-Utah Lake fan Physical geography.-_______________________________ 103 gravel.______-____--___-____---_-____ 121 Chemical quality of water in Utah Lake _______________ 104 Deposits of Utah Lake________________ 122 Climate ___________________________________________ 105 Alluvium of Utah Lake age______--__-___ 123 Culture and accessibility_____________________________ 105 Comparison of fauna of Utah Lake and Stratigraphy,______________________________________ 106 Lake Bonneville ages___--_--__-------- 123 Pre-Quaternary rocks.__________________________ 106 Ancient soils_-_--_-----------_-----_--------------- 123 Quaternary deposits in the mountains adjoining Lake history. _______ — _._ — —_ — __ — -_- —— -_ — _- — 124 southern Utah Valley. _ __-_____-______-_-_-___ 107 Structural geology.--------------------------------- 125 Quaternary deposits in southern Utah Valley_______ 107 Engineering geology_______________________________ 126 Pre-Lake Bonneville fan gravel,______________ 107 Gravel---------------------------------------- 126 Lake Bonneville group._____________________ 107 Sand— ——— ———— ———— ——— —— —— ——— ——— 127 Alpine formation. ______________________ 108 Clay--------------------------------------- 127 Bonneville formation____________________ 111 Other materials____ — _ —_ — ___ — _ — _ — -_ — -_— 127 Provo formation._______________________ 113 References cited__ — ____ —__ — _ — —_ — — — _ — _ — — — 127 Fan gravel of Lake Bonneville age ____________ 121 Index._________-_---_---_------------------------- 129 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 5. Geologic map of southern Utah Valley. — __ — ______-__ — _________ — _ — _---__-- — - — — - — — _-- — - ——In pocket FIGURE 23. Index map of Lake Bonneville______________________________________________________________________ 102 24. Aerial view of Wasatch Mountains south of Salem showing pre-Lake Bonneville alluvial fan_________________ 104 25. Bedding in silt member of the Alpine formation-. —_ — ___ — ___ —— _____ —— -_- — — __ — —— — — _ — — — -— 110 26. Varvelike silt and clay in the Alpine formation.________________________-______-_-----_--_--_-_--------- 110 27. Disconformity between the Bonneville and Alpine formation.__________ _ _ — _ — __ — __ — ______- — — ___ — — 112 28. Bar graphs of mechanical analyses of gravel from the Bonneville formation _______-_____ — — - — — — - — - — — 112 29. Disconformity between the Alpine and Bonneville formations.________ _— — ____— — ___-_- — — — — — — — - 112 30. Diagrammatic sketch of disconformity between the Alpine and Bonneville formations __________ — — ___ — _ — - 113 31. Sorting in gravel of the Provo formation..- —_ — __ — ___ —_ — ____ —— _ — _ — -- — — — — - — — - — — — — - — — 114 32. Post-Provo, pre-Utah Lake soil, developed on deltaic gravel of the Provo formation.________________________ 114 33. Delta deposit of the Provo formation.--. —__ — ,— — _ —_____ _— ___ — _ —— .__ — —— — --- — . — — - — — — — 114 34. Bar graphs of mechanical analyses of the gravel member of the Provo formation..-_________________________ 115 35. Deltaic silt and fine sand in the silt member of the Provo formation---.-_________ _ ___ — _ — __ — - — — — - — - 118 36. Gravel member of the Provo formation overlain by the diatomaceous unit of the silt member._____ _— ____— 119 37. Tufa in Utah Lake deposits. — .— — -_---___ — -_-- — _______- —— — _______-________________________ 123 TABLES TABLE 1. Chemical analyses of water in Utah Lake, 1883 to 1933__ — — ______ —__ — _-_ —— - — -__ — - — -- — — — — — 104 2. Chemical analyses of water in Utah Lake, 1933-____ — — __ — — __ — — — __ — — _ — _ — — ---_--- — — - — — - — - 104 3. Chemical analyses of water from thermal springs in or near Utah Lake._____ — _____- — -___ — _----_--_- — -_ 104 4. Chemical analyses of water of surface streams emptying into Utah Lake________ _ _ — — — __ — — — — — — - — - 105 5. Annual precipitation at various weather stations in southern Utah Valley. _________ — — ___ — — - — — — _- — -- 105 6. Monthly and annual mean temperatures in southern Utah Valley._________________________-_-_--_-_----_- 106 7. Highest temperature, lowest temperature, and prevailing wind direction in southern Utah Valley_-______-__-_ 106 8. Mechanical analyses of six samples of the gravel member of the Alpine formation_-__________-_--_____---_-- 109 9. Mechanical analyses of eight samples of the silt member of the Alpine formation._ — ________ — --- — — — _--- 111 10. Mechanical analyses of the gravel member of the Provo formation-_______________ _ ______ _ -------------- 116 11. Mechanical analyses of the sand member of the Provo formation.___________ ____ — — —_ — — — _ — — — — -- 117 12. Mechanical analyses of the silt member of the Provo formation. — __ — — — _ — __ — — __ — _ — _ — — — -- — -- — - 119 in LAKE BONNEVILLE: GEOLOGY OF SOUTHERN UTAH VALLEY, UTAH By HAROLD J. BJSSELL ABSTRACT A submature soil, as much as 2 feet thick, has formed on the up­ Southern Utah Valley is an area of about 400 square miles at permost beds of the Provo formation, but not on younger the east edge of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville. deposits. The valley floor consists mostly of sediments of Lake Bonne­ Fan gravel of late- and post-Provo age overlies the Provo ville and younger lakes. The sediments of Lake Bonneville formation; the gravel was deposited as streams incised the deltas overlap upon huge alluvial fans of pre-Lake Bonneville age and during the final recession of Lake Bonneville, in late Provo time. spread into the valley from the adjoining mountains. The fan Other post-Provo deposits include those of Utah Lake, which are 50 feet in maximum thickness and are subdivided into gravel, gravel bears a very mature (strongly developed) ancient soil, commonly 10 feet or more thick, which also is of pre-Lake sand, silt, clay, and tufa units; eolian sand; and alluvium of Utah Bonneville age. Lake age, deposited on the youngest fans and modern stream The sediments of Lake Bonneville, the Lake Bonneville group, flood plains. The lacustrine mollusks of different ages show slight differ­ consist of three formations: the Alpine (oldest), Bonneville, and the Provo (youngest). ences. A few species found in the deposits of Utah Lake have The Alpine formation, as much as 335 feet in exposed thickness, not been found in the Lake Bonneville group, and a few species is divided into gravel, sand, silt, and clay members, depending found in the Provo formation have not been found in the Alpine. Also, the coiling of the gastropods seems to be wholly dextral on the dominant texture. Silt and clay predominate. This formation records the first deep-water cycle of Lake Bonneville in the Alpine formation and partly sinistral in the Provo. and extends to an altitude of about 5,100 feet, the maximum of Utah Valley is a structural valley bounded by faults, but this lake cycle. folding has contributed to the deformation. Deformation has occurred repeatedly—at least twice in the Precambrian and A disconformity, representing subaerial erosion, a submature again midway in Cretaceous, Late Cretaceous, Early Tertiary, soil, and loess and alluvium locally separate the Alpine and Bonneville formations. These subaerial features occur at alti­ Late Tertiary, and in Quaternary time—and is still continuing. tudes as low as about 4,840 feet in southern Utah Valley and The pre-Lake Bonneville fan gravel is faulted as much as 150 indicate lake recession was at least this low between the Alpine feet, and the Lake Bonneville group is displaced as much as 50 and Bonneville lake cycles. feet by later fault movements. The Bonneville formation is much thinner, generally less than The gravel, sand, and clay in the valley are used extensively 35 feet thick, and is the smallest in volume of the Lake Bonneville as construction materials. group. It occurs mainly as a discontinuous selvage of gravel INTRODUCTION along the highest shoreline of Lake Bonneville, the Bonneville Utah Valley, in the northern part of central Utah, is shoreline of Gilbert, at an altitude of about 5,135 feet; it also an intermontane basin at the eastern margin of the occurs locally as small spits and bars at lower altitudes. It records the second deep-lake cycle of Lake Bonneville. A Basin and Range province (Fenneman, 1928). Bound­ maturely developed soil, generally 3 to 4 feet thick, occurs on the ed on the east by the Wasatch Mountains and on the Alpine and Bonneville formations above the Provo shoreline, west by the East Tintic and the Lake
Recommended publications
  • Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake
    Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake File name: Ecological Role of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Focus on the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae and HABs Version 1.2 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake With a Focus on the Role of the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae on HABs Progress Report January 28, 2017 By: David C. Richards, Ph. D. OreoHelix Consulting Phone: 406.580.7816 Email: [email protected] and Theron Miller, Ph.D. Jordan River Farmington Bay Water Quality Council OreoHelix Consulting 1 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Introduction Benthic macroinvertebrates are a critical component of the ecology and ecosystem functioning of Utah Lake. They are a major link between sediment chemistry, water column chemistry, nutrient cycling, benthic algae, phytoplankton, and Utah Lake’s food web including carp, game fish, June suckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, etc. Benthic invertebrates provide underappreciated but invaluable ecosystem services and are keystone taxa instrumental for the functioning of Utah Lake’ ecosystem. It has become clear that several dominant benthic taxa, primarily chironomids, play a key role in the timing and intensity of harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the lake. Very few studies have been conducted on the benthic invertebrate assemblages in Utah Lake (Barnes and Toole 1981, Spencer and Denton 2003, Shiozawa and Barnes 1977) and none were conducted at the level and intensity that is presently being accomplished by this group. No study has ever examined the role of benthic invertebrates on HABs in Utah Lake, this is the first. Our research is also an important element of sediment chemistry, nutrients, and food web models that are presently being conducted by us and others on Utah Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Mountain Adaptive Resources Management Group
    2006 ANNUAL REPORT PARKER MOUNTAIN ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP (PARM) Cooperators Parker Mountain Grazing Association U. S. Bureau of Land Management U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service U. S. Forest Service U.S.D.A. Farm Services Agency U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services Utah Agricultural Experiment Station Utah Department of Agriculture and Food Utah Department of Natural Resources Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Utah Farm Bureau Federation Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration Utah State University, Vice President for Research Utah State University, Vice President for Extension Wayne and Piute County Commissions Prepared by David Dahlgren, Michael Guttery, Michael Monsen, and Terry Messmer Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Conflict Management Jack H. Berryman Institute Department of Wildland Resources Utah State University, Logan Verl Bagley Utah State University Extension Service Wayne and Piute County Extension Office January 2007 -1- Table of Contents Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 Background ...........................................................................................................3 Objectives ...............................................................................................................3 Sage-grouse Research .......................................................................................................4 Sage-grouse Biology
    [Show full text]
  • Isobases of the Algonquin and Iroquois Beaches, and Their Significance1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 21, PP. 227-248, PL. 5 JUNE 10, 1910 ISOBASES OF THE ALGONQUIN AND IROQUOIS BEACHES, AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE1 BY JAMES WALTER GOl.DTHWAIT (Read before the Society December 28, 1909) CONTENTS Page Introduction ............................................................................................................... 227 The Algonquin w ater-p lan e.................................................................................... 229 Stage recorded by the Algonquin beach.......................................................229 Isobases of the upwarped portion of the Algonquin plane...................... 233 The horizontal portion of the Algonquin plane.......................................... 236 The “hinge line” or “isobase of zero” ............................................................ 239 The Algonquin plane as a datum plane........................................................ 240 The Iroquois w ater-plane........................................................................................ 241 Relative ages of the Iroquois beach and the Algonquin beach..............241 Isobases of the Iroquois plane........................................................................ 242 Comparison of the two water-planes.................................................................... 243 The isobases and the pre-Cambrian boundary.................................................... 245 Summary ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch County Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch County Family Clinic-Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WCFC-WMH) is a comprehensive community mental health center providing mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Wasatch County. WCFC-WBH provides a mental health and Substance Use screening to any Wasatch County resident requesting services. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be seen as their benefits allow. Clients with no funding may be seen on a sliding fee scale. Who is eligible to receive substance abuse services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Identify how you manage wait lists. How do you ensure priority populations get served? WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services to residents of Wasatch County. Medicaid and commercial insurances are also accepted and services are provided as benefits allow. WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services as funding allows those without insurance or ability to pay. A sliding fee scale is available for these clients. Clients accepted into the drug court also have all services available and fees are also set based on the sliding scale.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-1-19 Transcript Bulletin
    The Meads’ love of Model A cars keeps them rolling See B1 TOOELETRANSCRIPT BULLETIN TUESDAY January 1, 2019 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 125 No. 61 $1.00 OF PERSONS THE YEAR DANIEL PACHECO • ROBIN DOUGLAS • ROB CLAUSING • MARIA SWEETEN RICHARD MITCHELL • ERIK GUMBRECHT • BRENDA FADDIS 2018 FRANCIE AUFDEMORTE/TTB PHOTO Daniel Pacheco, Robin Douglas, Rob Clausing, Maria Sweeten, Richard Mitchell, Erik Gumbrecht and Brenda Faddis served on the Tooele County Government Study Committee. The group’s members have been awarded the Tooele Transcript Bulletin’s Person of the Year. Government study committee Study committee of different backgrounds, experiences wins Person of the Year Award comes together for change Committee’s 2,500 hours of volunteer labor gave voters the chance to STEVE HOWE shape the future of Tooele County’s form of government STAFF WRITER A year of weekly meetings working toward a com- mon goal has a way of bringing people together. TIM GILLIE Commission will become history and the county will be When seven members of the Tooele County STAFF WRITER led by a five-member part-time legislative council and an Government Study Committee gathered this past week The Tooele County Form of Government Study appointed county manager. for a photo, you could hardly tell some of them had Committee logged over 2,500 hours of volunteer labor The study committee started weekly meetings in only met in 2017. There were plenty of smiles, laughs with the estimated value of $312,500 while reviewing the February 2017 with 11 members appointed by a special — and goofing off for the camera — during the shoot.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Conditions in Southern Utah Valley and Goshen Valley, Utah
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 28 GROUND-WATER CONDITIONS IN SOUTHERN UTAH VALLEY AND GOSHEN VALLEY, UTAH by R. M. Cordova Hydrologist, U. S. Geological Survey Prepared by The United States Geological Survey in cooperation with The Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1970 CONTENTS Page Abstract ... 1 Introduction .3 Location of the area .3 Purpose and scope of investigation .3 History and methods of investigation .3 Previous investigations .5 Physiography ... .5 Terminology .5 The valley floor .6 Surface streams .6 Utah Lake .7 The Central Utah Project .8 Acknowledgments .... .8 Well- and spring-numbering system .9 Use of metric units . 10 Geology of the ground-water reservoir 11 General features . 11 Southern Utah Valley 11 Goshen Valley .... 11 Aquifers in southern Utah Valley and Goshen Valley · 13 Ground water .23 Recharge .23 Seepage from waterways and irrigated land. ...25 Infiltration of precipitation .28 Subsurface flow .30 Discharge . .30 Drains and springs · 31 Wells . · 31 Evapotranspiration .33 Infiltration into municipal sewer systems .34 Discharge into Utah Lake . .36 Imbalance between recharge and discharge .37 Water-level fluctuations ........... .39 III CONTENTS-colltinued Page Ground water-continued Movement ..... .40 Southern Utah Valley .40 Goshen Valley ... .46 West Mountain area .46 Aquifer tests . .46 Description of an extensive aquifer test .49 Description of local aquifer tests. .50 Storage . .56 Ground-water development by wells .57 History of development .57 Well yields . .57 Legal status of water rights .60 Chemical quality .... .60 Relation to source · 61 Southern Utah Valley · 61 Goshen Valley · 61 Relation to use .
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially-Explicit Modeling of Modern and Pleistocene Runoff and Lake Extent in the Great Basin Region, Western United States
    Spatially-explicit modeling of modern and Pleistocene runoff and lake extent in the Great Basin region, western United States Yo Matsubara1 Alan D. Howard1 1Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia P.O. Box 400123 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 Abstract A spatially-explicit hydrological model balancing yearly precipitation and evaporation is applied to the Great Basin Region of the southwestern United States to predict runoff magnitude and lake distribution during present and Pleistocene climatic conditions. The model iteratively routes runoff through, and evaporation from, depressions to find a steady state solution. The model is calibrated with spatially-explicit annual precipitation estimates and compiled data on pan evaporation, mean annual temperature, and total yearly runoff from stations. The predicted lake distribution provides a close match to present-day lakes. For the last glacial maximum the sizes of lakes Bonneville and Lahontan were well predicted by linear combinations of decrease in mean annual temperature from 0 to 6 °C and increases in precipitation from 0.8 to 1.9 times modern values. Estimated runoff depths were about 1.2 to 4.0 times the present values and yearly evaporation about 0.3 to 1 times modern values. 2 1. Introduction The Great Basin of the southwestern United States in the Basin and Range physiographic province contains enclosed basins featuring perennial and ephemeral lakes, playas and salt pans (Fig. 1). The Great Basin consists of the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. At present it supports an extremely dry, desert environment; however, about 40 lakes (some reaching the size of present day Great Lakes) episodically occupied the Great Basin, most recently during the last glacial maximum (LGM) [Snyder and Langbein, 1962; Hostetler et al., 1994; Madsen et al., 2001].
    [Show full text]
  • A Great Basin-Wide Dry Episode During the First Half of the Mystery
    Quaternary Science Reviews 28 (2009) 2557–2563 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev A Great Basin-wide dry episode during the first half of the Mystery Interval? Wallace S. Broecker a,*, David McGee a, Kenneth D. Adams b, Hai Cheng c, R. Lawrence Edwards c, Charles G. Oviatt d, Jay Quade e a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA b Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA c Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA d Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Thompson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA e Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA article info abstract Article history: The existence of the Big Dry event from 14.9 to 13.8 14C kyrs in the Lake Estancia New Mexico record Received 25 February 2009 suggests that the deglacial Mystery Interval (14.5–12.4 14C kyrs) has two distinct hydrologic parts in the Received in revised form western USA. During the first, Great Basin Lake Estancia shrank in size and during the second, Great Basin 15 July 2009 Lake Lahontan reached its largest size. It is tempting to postulate that the transition between these two Accepted 16 July 2009 parts of the Mystery Interval were triggered by the IRD event recorded off Portugal at about 13.8 14C kyrs which post dates Heinrich event #1 by about 1.5 kyrs. This twofold division is consistent with the record from Hulu Cave, China, in which the initiation of the weak monsoon event occurs in the middle of the Mystery Interval at 16.1 kyrs (i.e., about 13.8 14C kyrs).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Royal Skousen
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Fundamental Scholarly Discoveries and Academic Accomplishments listed in an addendum first placed online in 2014 plus an additional statement regarding the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project from November 2014 through December 2018 13 May 2020 O in 2017-2020 in progress Royal Skousen Professor of Linguistics and English Language 4037 JFSB Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 [email protected] 801-422-3482 (office, with phone mail) 801-422-0906 (fax) personal born 5 August 1945 in Cleveland, Ohio married to Sirkku Unelma Härkönen, 24 June 1968 7 children 2 education 1963 graduated from Sunset High School, Beaverton, Oregon 1969 BA (major in English, minor in mathematics), Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1971 MA (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972 PhD (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois teaching positions 1970-1972 instructor of the introductory and advanced graduate courses in mathematical linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972-1979 assistant professor of linguistics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1979-1981 assistant professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1981-1986 associate professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1986-2001 professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah O 2001-2018 professor of linguistics and English language, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 2007-2010 associate chair,
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Valley Chapter Newsletter
    OCTOBER 1997 No. 2 OCTOBER CHAPTER MEETING Christmas in October? Of course. The season will be upon us sooner than we’d like to think, so we may as well be prepared for it. Have you arranged a carol or found an arrangement of a noel for prelude or postlude that you would like to share with us? Do you have an interesting way of playing a Christmas hymn for congregational singing? Take a minute and dig through your repertoire, before the snow flies, and see if AMERICAN there may be something you would like to present at the meeting. GUILD OF ORGANISTS We plan to do this sharing on Thursday, October 16th , at 7:30 p.m. at the Sunset Stake 1 9 9 7 Center, 1560 S. 1100 W., Provo (see directions on back). Thanks to Mary Paz for scheduling her meeting house for us, and to LuJean Moss for refreshments. Since we’d like to have a variety of Christmas music represented, it probably won’t do us any good to have 15+ arrangements or free accompaniments of Silent Night. In Utah Valley order to have things coordinated, please call DeeAnn Stone (377-4748 or email: [email protected]) with what you would like to do, so she can plan the program. Please Chapter call as soon as you can, so we’ll know who would like to participate. Carol Smart, Dean Newsletter of the Salt Lake Chapter, said that their chapter would like to join us, too. It will be a fun evening preparing for the Christmas season with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Valley Tower
    UTAH VALLEY TOWER Water Gardens Cinema FOR LEASE ) DT 0 A 0,48 lvd. (3 ove B t Gr an as le P SITE UVBP - Site Plan 31 May 2019 Pleasant Grove Utah | Woodbury SITE PLAN Salt Lake City 52 Exchange Place SLC, UT 84111 801.531.1144 | Boise 800 W. Main Street Suite 940 Boise, ID 83702 208.424.7675 | babcockdesign.com 1050 SOUTH 4850 WEST | AMERICAN FORK, UTAH Marketed Exclusively by Developed by Brandon Fugal Jordan Wall Josh Smith +1 801 947 8300 +1 801 947 8300 +1 801 453 6823 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] UTAH VALLEY TOWER SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN Project Features • 150,000 square foot Class A office tower • Amenities include: Gym, Lounge, and Locker rooms, Gazebos for lunch seating, Sports courts, etc. • 5 X 30,000 square foot floor plates flfifi • Location is dynamic with unmatched I-15 exposure, • Lease rate: $28.50 PSF / FS redundant access to I-15, and it is the only • 18’ First floor ceilings, 14’ floor to floor on 2-5 opportunity zone office in Silicon Slopes. • • Parking ratio: 5.24/1,000 Expansion capability • Unique branding opportunities • Prime mountain views • Crown Signage SITE PLAN Developed By Brandon Fugal Jordan Wall Josh Smith UVBP - Site Plan 31 May 2019 This documentPleasant has been Grove prepared Utah by | Colliers Woodbury International for advertising and general information only. Colliers International makes no guarantees, representations or warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, regarding the information in- +1 801 947 8300 +1 801 947 8300 +1 801 453 6823 SITE PLAN cluding, but not limited to, warranties of content, accuracy and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah County Canal Companies Utah Based on Canal Companies in Utah 2015
    Utah County Canal Companies Utah Based on Canal Companies In Utah 2015 ID# Company Name County 1129 Spring Glen Company Utah 1083 American Fork Irrigation Company Utah 1241 Cedar Fort Irrigation Company Utah 1054 Current Creek Irrigation Company Utah 1044 Duck Creek Irrigation Company Utah 1112 East Bench Canal Company Utah 1088 East River Bottom Water Company Utah 1073 East Santaquin Irrigation Company Utah 1113 Elberta Water Company Utah 1081 Fort Field Little Dry Creek Water Users Association Utah 1114 Goshen Irrigation and Canal Company Utah 1239 Harvest Irrigation Company Utah 1064 Lake Bottom Irrigation Canal Company Utah 1253 Lehi Irrigation Company Utah Page 1 of 57 09/30/2021 Utah County Canal Companies Utah Based on Canal Companies In Utah 2015 Census Tract Zip Code Phone Location 1 Boundaries 84013 8013728300 P.O. Box 338 Cedar Fort, UT 84626 8014200731 P.O. Box 10 Elberta, UT 84660 8017981395 20 S 1700 E Spanish Fork, UT 84603 8013738848 P.O. Box 888 Provo, UT 84655 8013765056 P.O. Box 85 Santaquin, UT 84626 8017987351 P.O. Box 27 Elberta, UT 84633 8016673289 PO Box 106 Goshen, UT 84043 8015927106 P.O. Box 251 Lehi, UT 84043 8018631036 P.O. Box 316 Lehi, UT Page 2 of 57 09/30/2021 Utah County Canal Companies Utah Based on Canal Companies In Utah 2015 Utah Senate Utah House Municipalities Districts Districts Page 3 of 57 09/30/2021 Utah County Canal Companies Utah Based on Canal Companies In Utah 2015 1045 Lehi Spring Creek Irrigation Co. Utah 1079 Lindon Pumping Company Utah 1076 Loafer Water Users Association Utah 1116 Manila
    [Show full text]