Summary the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Program The GEF-funded project “Implementation of the Ecosystem Approach in the Adriatic Sea through Marine Spatial Results Planning” (GEF Adriatic) is carried out across the Adriatic- Ionian region with focus on two countries: Albania and Montenegro. of Marine Research The main objective of the project is to restore the ecological balance of the Adriatic Sea through the use of the ecosystem in Montenegro approach and marine spatial planning. Also, the project aims at accelerating the enforcement of the Integrated Coastal Zone Management Protocol and facilitating the implementation of Summary the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Program. Eventually, it will contribute to the achievement of the good environmental status of the entire Adriatic. The project is jointly lead by UNEP/MAP, PAP/RAC and SPA/RAC. In Montenegro, the project is being implemented with the coordination of the Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism. The project duration is from 2018 to 2021. Logos en anglais, avec versions courtes des logos ONU Environnement et PAM La version longue des logos ONU Environnement et PAM doit être utilisée dans les documents ou juridiques. La version courte des logos est destine tous les produits de communication tourns vers le public. Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MONTENEGRO IV Proleterske brigade 19, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM E: [email protected] Coordination: Ivana Stojanović (Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism), Marina Marković (PAP/RAC) Authors: EO1: Vesna Mačić (Posidonia oceanica) and Slavica Petović (coralligenous assemblages) (Institute for marine biology, University of Montenegro); Egidio Trainito (coralligenous assemblages in Boka Kotorska Bay) EO5: Danijela Joksimović (marine chemistry), Dragana Drakulović (phytoplankton) and Branka Pestorić (mezozooplankton) (Institute for marine biology, University of Montenegro); Davor Lučić (microzooplankton) (Institute for marine and coastal research, University of Dubrovnik) EO7: Branka Grbec (Institute for oceanography and fisheries) EO9: Danijela Šuković, Vladimir Živković, Bojana Knežević, Željka Ćetković (Center for ecotoxicological research) Summary prepared by: Marija Tripunović Editing: Cover design: swim2birds.co.uk Graphical editing: Ljudomat Proofreading: Cakum-Pakum d.o.o. This report has been prepared as part of the GEF Adriatic project, funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). For bibliographical purposes this document may be cited as: UNEP/MAP-PAP/RAC-SPA/RAC and MSDT (2019). Results of Marine Research in Montenegro – Summary. Ed: PAP/RAC – GEF Adriatic project. 46pp Results of Marine Research in Montenegro – Summary Table of contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 BIODIVERSITY OF POSIDONIA MEADOW (Posidonia oceanica) ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 HRID ĐERAN LOCATION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 CRNI RT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 BULJARICA LOCATION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 2 CORALLIGENOUS ASSEMBLAGES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 CORALLIGENOUS ASSEMBLAGES IN BOKA KOTORSKA BAY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Dražin vrt ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Sopot ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3 Turski rt ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.4 Conclusion: Coralligenous assemblages in Boka Kotorska Bay ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 CORALLIGENOUS ASSEMBLAGES IN THE OPEN SEA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Velika Krekavica cave .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Ponta Veslo ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Rt Mačka ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.4 Conclusion: Coralligenous assemblages in the open sea ............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 HYDROGRAPHY, EUTROPHICATION AND CONTAMINANTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3 HIDROGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 THERMOHALINE PROPERTIES ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 TRANSPARENCY ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 4 EUTROPHICATION ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1 DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONTENT IN THE WATER COLUMN ............................................................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2 CONCENTRATION OF KEY NUTRIENTS IN THE WATER COLUMN ................................................................................................................................................................... 28 4.3 CHLOROPHYLL-A AND PLANKTON ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 29 5 CONTAMINANTS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 5.1 HEAVY
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Classification of Benthic Marine Habitat Types for The
    Updated Classification of Benthic Marine Habitat Types for the Mediterranean Region TUNISIA - 2019 Legal notice: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) and UN Environment/Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP) and those of the Lebanese Ministry of Environment concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. This publication was produced with the fi nancial support of the European Union in the framework of the MedMPA Network Project. Its contents are the sole responsibility of SPA/RAC and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the European Union. Copyright : All property rights of texts and content of different types of this publication belong to SPA/RAC. Reproduction of these texts and contents, in whole or in part, and in any form, is prohibited without prior written permission from SPA/RAC, except for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. © 2019 - United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Specially Protected Areas Regional Activity Centre (SPA/RAC) Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 1080 Tunis Cedex - Tunisia. [email protected] For bibliographic purposes, this document may be cited as: SPA/RAC–UN Environment/MAP, 2019: Updated Classifi cation of Benthic Marine Habitat Types for the Mediterranean Region Layout : Atef OUERGHI Cover photos credit: © SPA/RAC, University of Seville, University of Alicante, Trainito E.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Mimoza Tourist Complex About Atlas Group
    Cape Mimoza Tourist complex About Atlas Group Atlas Group has over 30 members operating in the area of banking,​​ financial services, insurance, real estate, production, tourism, media, education, culture and sport. Our companies have offices in Montenegro, Serbia, Cyprus and Russia Atlas Group is organised as a modern management unit with a main objective to increase the value of all member companies by improving performance, investing in new projects and creating of synergy between the member companies. Atlas Group operates in line with global trends promoting sustainable development and utilization of renewable energy sources. Philanthropic activities conducted through the Atlas Group Foundation, which is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative. Atlas Bank was awarded the status of the best Bank in Montenegro, and Atlas Group as best financial group for 2009. by world economy magazine "World finance’’. In order to promote its mission Atlas Group has hosted many famous personalities from the spheres of politics, business, show business and arts. About Montenegro Located in Southeast Europe in the heart of Mediterranean. Extreme natural beauty and cultural – historical heritage (4 national parks, Old town Kotor under UNESCO protection). Area: 13.812 km2; population: 620.000; climate: continental, mediterranean and mountain; Capital city Podgorica with around 200.000 inhabitants. Borders with Croatia, BIH, Serbia, Albania and South part faces Adriatic Sea. Traffic connection: airports Podgorica, Tivat in Montenegro and airport in Dubrovnik, Croatia, port of Bar and Porto Montenegro, good connection of roads with international traffic. Currency: EUR Achieved political and economic stability – in the process of joining: EU, WTO and NATO Economy is largely oriented towards real estate and tourism development– stimulative investment climate (income tax 9%, VAT 17%, customs rate 6,6%, tax on real estate transaction 3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Analysis on Length of Coastline Occupied by Human-Made Structures
    Towards a Marine Good Environmental Status (GES) in Montenegro Spatial Analysis on Length of Coastline Occupied by Human-made Structures Logos en anglais, avec versions courtes des logos ONU Environnem ent et PAM La version longue des logos ONU Environnem ent et PAM doit être utilisée dans les docum ents ou juridique Ls.a v ersio ncour te des logos est destin e tous les produit sde com m unicati otonurn s vers le public. Author: Željka Čurović, architect and landscape planner, Montenegro Graphic design: Old School S.P. Cover image: Examples of defining the type of coastline along the main road in the Bay of Kotor The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This study was prepared by PAP/RAC, SPA/RAC, UNEP/MAP, and the Ministry of Ecology, Spatial Planning and Urbanism of Montenegro within the GEF Adriatic Project and supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). Spatial Analysis on Length of Coastline Occupied by Human-made Structures Table of contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Previous analyses .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Mediterranean 'Cnidarian Populations In
    Homage to Ramon Marga/et,· or, Why there is such p/easure in studying nature 243 (J. D. Ros & N. Prat, eds.). 1991 . Oec% gia aquatica, 10: 243-254 STRUCTURE OF 'CNIDARIAN POPULATIONS IN MEDITERRANEAN SUBLITTORAL BENTHIC COMMUNITIES AS A RESUL T OF ADAPTATION TO DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 2 JOSEP-MARIA GILIl & ENRIe BALLESTEROs .• 1 Insti t de Ciencies del Mar (CSIC). Passeig Nacional, s/n. 08039 Barcelona. Spain 2 � Centre d'Estudis Avanc;:atsde Blanes (CSIC). Camí de Santa Barbara, s/n. 17300 Blanes. Spain Received: March 1990 SUMMARY The presence and abundance of Cnidarians, extremely cornmon in Mediterranean sublittoral benthic communities, exerts a profound effect on the entire structure of such communities, although the roles of Anthozoans and Hydrozoans differ in accordance with their different biological characteristics. Structural differences in benthic cnidarian populations were observed in three sublittoral cornmunities located within 100 m of each other yet differing considerably in light intensity and water movement. Species-area and Shannon's diversity-area curves were computed for each community from reticulate samples constituted by 18 subsamples 2 of 289 cm . Species-area curves were fitted to semilogarithmic functions, while diversity-area curves were fitted to Michaelis-Menten functions by the method of least squares. Species richness, species distribution, alpha-diversity, and pattem diversity were estimated from the fitted curves. Patch size for Anthozoans was smaller than that for Hydrozoans in all three communities. Diversity was greatest in the cornmunities with the lowest and with the highest light intensity and water flow levels, but species richness was highest in the intermediate community.
    [Show full text]
  • First Massive Mucilage Event Observed in Deep Waters of Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles), Turkey
    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 27, No. 1: 49-66 (2021) RESEARCH ARTICLE First massive mucilage event observed in deep waters of Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles), Turkey H. Barış Özalp ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2640-8912 Vocational School of Ocean Engineering, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, TURKEY Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, TURKEY Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract During the regular surveys on coral monitoring for setting their developmental level, health status and likely threats responsible for mortality, a massive mucilage phenomenon was identified in the largest coral habitats in the Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles) in December 2020. This study was performed to determine the effect of mucilage event on corals mainly observed at the depth level of 39-51 m in two stations, one in the European and the other in the Anatolian side of the strait. A massive mucilage with expanding cloud and floc types of aggregates was detected only in the Eceabat region (European side). A false-benthos mucilage was also identified at depths 4-20 m in the following control surveys. The current report is of the first circalittoral observation of this damaging event in the northernmost region of the Mediterranean Sea. Previous records of massive mucilage were reviewed and the first deep infralittoral record of massive mucilage event in 2008 is also described. Keywords: Mucilage, zoobenthos, coral, ecology, Turkish Straits System Received: 05.03.2021, Accepted: 05.04.2021 Introduction Mucilage, also known as marine snow, aggregated mass, foam accumulation, formation of flocs, cloud or mucilaginous and mucous agglomeration (Suzuki and Kato 1953; Riley 1963; Lancelot 1995; Rinaldi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Corales De Las Islas Canarias
    ETSI MINAS (UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID) CORALES DE LAS ISLAS CANARIAS FICHERO Ignacio Alonso Provencio Lorena Blanco Muñoz Marzo de 2013, Prácticas en los laboratorio del IGME 1 CONOCIMIENTOS PREVIOS SOBRE LOS CORALES: ANATOMÍA Los corales marinos son animales coloniales, salvo excepciones, pertenecientes al filo Cnidaria, clase Anthozoa. Las colonias están formadas por hasta miles de individuos zooides y pueden alcanzar grandes dimensiones. Las distintas especies de invertebrados con los que vamos a tratar perteneces al grupo de los antozoos, es decir, cnidarios que sólo tienen una fase pólipo (carecen de fase medusa) y poseen una cavidad gástrica dividida en compartimentos. El término "coral marino" suele usarse para designar a los antozoos; los corales se dividen en blandos y duros (en función del exoesqueleto que presenten), según tengan esqueleto o no: - DUROS: antozoos que generan un esqueleto calcáreo duro, especialmente si construyen colonias ramificadas. También son comunes las especies que forman colonias compactas incluso con un esqueleto córneo y flexible. - BLANDOS: son antozoos pertenecientes a las especies del orden Alcyonacea, que no generan esqueleto y utilizan el calcio en forma de espículas (unidades esqueléticas calcáreas o silíceas que forman parte del esqueleto de los poríferos) repartidas por su tejido carnoso, para proporcionarles mayor rigidez y consistencia. La perspectiva embriológica de los cnidarios es uno de los aspectos más importantes; normalmente el zigoto da lugar a una blástula con un espacio interior o bien, da lugar a una blástula maciza. Los antozoos, poseen tres capas de tejidos plenamente desarrollados: - ECTODERMO: capa celular primaria más externa del embrión. Da lugar al sistema nervioso, órganos especiales de los sentidos, la epidermis y derivados epidérmicos.
    [Show full text]
  • Coralligenous Assemblages Along Their
    Coralligenous assemblages along their geographical distribution: Testing of concepts and implications for management Melih Ertan Çinar, Jean-Pierre Féral, Christos Arvanitidis, Romain David, Ergün Taşkin, Maria Sini, Thanos Dailianis, Alper Doğan, Vasilis Gerovasileiou, Alper Evcen, et al. To cite this version: Melih Ertan Çinar, Jean-Pierre Féral, Christos Arvanitidis, Romain David, Ergün Taşkin, et al.. Coralligenous assemblages along their geographical distribution: Testing of concepts and implications for management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, Wiley, 2020, 30, pp.1578 - 1594. 10.1002/aqc.3365. hal-02892573 HAL Id: hal-02892573 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02892573 Submitted on 11 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Aquatic Conservation, Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (2020) 30: 1578-1594, DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3365 Coralligenous assemblages along their geographical distribution: Testing of concepts and implications for management Melih Ertan Çinar1 | Jean-Pierre Féral2 | Christos Arvanitidis3
    [Show full text]
  • (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). 1
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 11 No 3 265¿292 ZAGREB September 30, 2002 ISSN 1330-0520 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad UDK 591.9:593.6(497.5/(262.3)(1–13) MARINE FAUNA OF THE MLJET NATIONAL PARK (ADRIATIC SEA, CROATIA). 1. ANTHOZOA PETAR KRU@I] Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia ([email protected]) Thais – Society for Exploration and Conservation of Nature, Primorska 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Kru`i}, P.: Marine fauna of the Mljet National Park (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). 1. Anthozoa. Nat. Croat., Vol. 11, No. 3., 265–292, 2002, Zagreb. Fifty-two anthozoan species were recorded and collected in the area of Mljet National Park dur- ing surveys from 1995 to 1998. General and ecological data are presented for each species, as well as distribution and local abundance. Recorded species account for about 60% of anthozoans known in the Adriatic Sea, and for about 45% of anthozoans known in the Mediterranean Sea. Eight of these species were not recorded previously in the Adriatic Sea. Eleven species are considered to be Mediterranean endemics. The heterogeneity of substrates and benthic communities is considerable in the Mljet National Park, with anthozoans present on most different kinds of substrates and in a wide range of benthic communities. Remarkably, the colonial coral Cladocora caespitosa builds a large »reef-like« structure in the Veliko Jezero, in the area characterized by strong bottom hydro- dynamism. Key words: marine fauna, Anthozoa, Mljet, Adriatic Sea Kru`i}, P.: Morska fauna Nacionalnog parka Mljet (Jadransko more, Hrvatska). 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Trends in the Epithecate Scleractinian Corals
    Evolutionary trends in the epithecate scleractinian corals EWA RONIEWICZ and JAROSEAW STOLARSKI Roniewicz, E. & Stolarski, J. 1999. Evolutionary trends in the epithecate scleractinian corals. -Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 44,2, 131-166. Adult stages of wall ontogeny of fossil and Recent scleractinians show that epitheca was the prevailing type of wall in Triassic and Jurassic corals. Since the Late Cretaceous the fre- quency of epithecal walls during adult stages has decreased. In the ontogeny of Recent epithecate corals, epitheca either persists from the protocorallite to the adult stage, or is re- placed in post-initial stages by trabecular walls that are often accompanied by extra- -calicular skeletal elements. The former condition means that the polyp initially lacks the edge zone, the latter condition means that the edge zone develops later in coral ontogeny. Five principal patterns in wall ontogeny of fossil and Recent Scleractinia are distinguished and provide the framework for discrimination of the four main stages (grades) of evolu- tionary development of the edge-zone. The trend of increasing the edge-zone and reduction of the epitheca is particularly well represented in the history of caryophylliine corals. We suggest that development of the edge-zone is an evolutionary response to changing envi- ronment, mainly to increasing bioerosion in the Mesozoic shallow-water environments. A glossary is given of microstructural and skeletal terms used in this paper. Key words : Scleractinia, microstructure, thecal structures, epitheca, phylogeny. Ewa Roniewicz [[email protected]]and Jarostaw Stolarski [[email protected]], Instytut Paleobiologii PAN, ul. Twarda 51/55, PL-00-818 Warszawa, Poland. In Memory of Gabriel A.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan
    UNITED NATIONS UNEP/MED WG.467/14 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 8 August 2019 Original: English 7th Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach Coordination Group Athens, Greece, 9 September 2019 Agenda Item 8: Monitoring Protocols for IMAP Common Indicators Related to Pollution and Guidance on monitoring concerning IMAP Common Indicators related to Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species Draft Updated Reference List of Marine Habitat Types for the Selection of Sites to be included in the National Inventories of Natural Sites of Conservation Interest in the Mediterranean For environmental and economy reasons, this document is printed in a limited number and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP Athens 2019 Note by the Secretariat The Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean and the Action plan for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Sustainable Development of the Coastal Areas of the Mediterranean (MAP Phase II), adopted by the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention in 1995, contain provisions for the preparation of inventories at national as well as regional level. At their 10th Ordinary Meeting (Tunis, 18-21 November 1998), the Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution adopted common criteria for the preparation of national inventories of natural sites of conservation interest. The criteria provided for the establishment of a reference list of marine and coastal natural habitat types, to be drafted on the basis of a model classification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mediterranean Mesophotic Coral Reef Built by Non-Symbiotic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A Mediterranean mesophotic coral reef built by non-symbiotic scleractinians Received: 30 July 2018 Giuseppe Corriero1,2, Cataldo Pierri1,3, Maria Mercurio1,2, Carlotta Nonnis Marzano1,2, Accepted: 8 February 2019 Senem Onen Tarantini1, Maria Flavia Gravina4,2, Stefania Lisco5,2, Massimo Moretti5,2, Published: xx xx xxxx Francesco De Giosa6, Eliana Valenzano5, Adriana Giangrande2,7, Maria Mastrodonato1, Caterina Longo 1,2 & Frine Cardone 1,2 This is the frst description of a Mediterranean mesophotic coral reef. The bioconstruction extended for 2.5 km along the Italian Adriatic coast in the bathymetric range −30/−55 m. It appeared as a framework of coral blocks mostly built by two scleractinians, Phyllangia americana mouchezii (Lacaze- Duthiers, 1897) and Polycyathus muellerae (Abel, 1959), which were able to edify a secondary substrate with high structural complexity. Scleractinian corallites were cemented by calcifed polychaete tubes and organized into an interlocking meshwork that provided the reef stifness. Aggregates of several individuals of the bivalve Neopycnodonte cochlear (Poli, 1795) contributed to the compactness of the structure. The species composition of the benthic community showed a marked similarity with those described for Mediterranean coralligenous communities and it appeared to be dominated by invertebrates, while calcareous algae, which are usually considered the main coralligenous reef- builders, were poorly represented. Overall, the studied reef can be considered a unique environment, to be included in the wide and diversifed category of Mediterranean bioconstructions. The main reef- building scleractinians lacked algal symbionts, suggesting that heterotrophy had a major role in the metabolic processes that supported the production of calcium carbonate.
    [Show full text]