Zootaxa, Caryophylliidae (Scleractinia) from the Colombian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zootaxa, Caryophylliidae (Scleractinia) from the Colombian TERMS OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited. Zootaxa 2262: 1–39 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Caryophylliidae (Scleractinia) from the Colombian Caribbean JAVIER REYES1, NADIEZHDA SANTODOMINGO1, 2 & STEPHEN CAIRNS3 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, INVEMAR, Cerro de Punta Betín, AA 1016 Santa Marta, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 3 National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20013, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Caryophylliidae Dana, 1846 ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Caryophyllia berteriana Duchassaing, 1850 ............................................................................................................... 5 Caryophyllia crypta Cairns, 2000................................................................................................................................ 6 Caryophyllia barbadensis Cairns, 1979 ...................................................................................................................... 6 Caryophyllia ambrosia caribbeana Cairns, 1979........................................................................................................ 8 Coenocyathus parvulus (Cairns, 1979)........................................................................................................................ 8 Trochocyathus rawsonii Pourtalès, 1874 ..................................................................................................................... 9 Trochocyathus sp. cf. T. fasciatus Cairns, 1979........................................................................................................... 9 Tethocyathus prahli Lattig & Cairns, 2000 ................................................................................................................ 10 Tethocyathus variabilis Cairns, 1979 ......................................................................................................................... 10 Paracyathus pulchellus (Philippi, 1842) ................................................................................................................... 11 Polycyathus senegalensis Chevalier, 1966 ................................................................................................................ 12 Polycyathus mayae Cairns, 2000................................................................................................................................ 12 Cladocora debilis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 ................................................................................................... 12 Cladocora arbuscula (Lesueur, 1821) ....................................................................................................................... 15 Deltocyathus calcar Pourtalès, 1874 ......................................................................................................................... 15 Deltocyathus sp. cf. D. italicus (Michelotti, 1838) .................................................................................................... 16 Deltocyathus eccentricus Cairns, 1979 ...................................................................................................................... 17 Stephanocyathus (Stephanocyathus) diadema (Moseley, 1876)................................................................................ 17 Stephanocyathus (Stephanocyathus) paliferus Cairns, 1977 ..................................................................................... 18 Stephanocyathus (Stephanocyathus) laevifundus Cairns, 1977 ................................................................................. 18 Stephanocyathus (Stephanocyathus) isabellae, new species ..................................................................................... 19 Stephanocyathus (Odontocyathus) coronatus (Pourtalès, 1867) ............................................................................... 20 Thalamophyllia riisei (Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1860) ......................................................................................... 20 Eusmilia fastigiata (Pallas, 1766) .............................................................................................................................. 21 Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus, 1758) ............................................................................................................................ 21 Oxysmilia rotundifolia (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848) ......................................................................................... 22 Colangia immersa (Pourtalès, 1871) ......................................................................................................................... 22 Phyllangia americana americana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 .......................................................................... 24 Rhizosmilia maculata (Pourtalès, 1874) .................................................................................................................... 24 Phacelocyathus flos (Pourtalès, 1878) ....................................................................................................................... 25 Anomocora fecunda (Pourtalès, 1871) ....................................................................................................................... 25 Anomocora prolifera (Pourtalès, 1871) ..................................................................................................................... 26 Anomocora marchadi (Chevalier, 1966) ................................................................................................................... 26 Coenosmilia arbuscula Pourtalès, 1874 .................................................................................................................... 27 Heterocyathus antoniae, new species ........................................................................................................................ 27 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 References ......................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Appendix 1. Station list...................................................................................................................................................... 35 Accepted by C. Wallace: 3 Sep. 2009; published: 12 Oct. 2009 1 TERMS OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited. Abstract The family Caryophylliidae comprises the highest diversity of hard corals (Order Scleractinia), represented by more than 300 species around the world. More than 90% are non-symbiotic species (azooxanthellate), whereas less than 30 species are symbiotic (zooxanthellate) or facultative (apozooxanthellate) species. This paper includes 35 species (20 genera) of caryophylliids present in soft and hard bottoms of Colombian seas, which have been mainly collected through INVEMAR expeditions (between 10 and 500 m depth) during the last 10 years. Two new species are described, Stephanocyathus isabellae and Heterocyathus antoniae, the latter belonging to a genus previously known only from the Indian and Pacific oceans. Key words: Caryophylliidae; Colombian Caribbean; azooxanthellate coral; biodiversity; taxonomy Introduction Taxonomic inventories of azooxanthellate corals in the tropical western Atlantic are relatively well advanced. The majority of campaigns have been carried out in Florida, Gulf of Mexico, Yucatan, Great Antilles, Lesser Antilles, Barbados, and the Leeward Islands (Duerden 1902; Boschma 1953; Almy and Carrión-Torres 1963; Roos 1971; Beltrán-Torres and Carricart-Ganivet 1999; Cairns 1979; 1982; 2000). However, the southern and western Caribbean, including Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, and Nicaragua has been less studied. This information gap is remarkable considering the less survey effort in those areas. For instance, of the 1200 sampling stations where coral specimens have been collected throughout the tropical western Atlantic, only 50 sites were located in the Colombian Caribbean (~3.5%), and only 43 of the 129 azooxanthellate coral species were known from such areas before the year 2000. The first azooxanthellate coral species recorded for the Colombian Caribbean was Stephanocyathus nobilis (Moseley, 1873) [=
Recommended publications
  • The Coral Trait Database, a Curated Database of Trait Information for Coral Species from the Global Oceans
    www.nature.com/scientificdata OPEN The Coral Trait Database, a curated SUBJECT CATEGORIES » Community ecology database of trait information for » Marine biology » Biodiversity coral species from the global oceans » Biogeography 1 2 3 2 4 Joshua S. Madin , Kristen D. Anderson , Magnus Heide Andreasen , Tom C.L. Bridge , , » Coral reefs 5 2 6 7 1 1 Stephen D. Cairns , Sean R. Connolly , , Emily S. Darling , Marcela Diaz , Daniel S. Falster , 8 8 2 6 9 3 Erik C. Franklin , Ruth D. Gates , Mia O. Hoogenboom , , Danwei Huang , Sally A. Keith , 1 2 2 4 10 Matthew A. Kosnik , Chao-Yang Kuo , Janice M. Lough , , Catherine E. Lovelock , 1 1 1 11 12 13 Osmar Luiz , Julieta Martinelli , Toni Mizerek , John M. Pandolfi , Xavier Pochon , , 2 8 2 14 Morgan S. Pratchett , Hollie M. Putnam , T. Edward Roberts , Michael Stat , 15 16 2 Carden C. Wallace , Elizabeth Widman & Andrew H. Baird Received: 06 October 2015 28 2016 Accepted: January Trait-based approaches advance ecological and evolutionary research because traits provide a strong link to Published: 29 March 2016 an organism’s function and fitness. Trait-based research might lead to a deeper understanding of the functions of, and services provided by, ecosystems, thereby improving management, which is vital in the current era of rapid environmental change. Coral reef scientists have long collected trait data for corals; however, these are difficult to access and often under-utilized in addressing large-scale questions. We present the Coral Trait Database initiative that aims to bring together physiological, morphological, ecological, phylogenetic and biogeographic trait information into a single repository.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE FAUNA and FLORA of BERMUDA a Systematic Guide to the Identification of Marine Organisms
    MARINE FAUNA AND FLORA OF BERMUDA A Systematic Guide to the Identification of Marine Organisms Edited by WOLFGANG STERRER Bermuda Biological Station St. George's, Bermuda in cooperation with Christiane Schoepfer-Sterrer and 63 text contributors A Wiley-Interscience Publication JOHN WILEY & SONS New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore ANTHOZOA 159 sucker) on the exumbrella. Color vari­ many Actiniaria and Ceriantharia can able, mostly greenish gray-blue, the move if exposed to unfavorable condi­ greenish color due to zooxanthellae tions. Actiniaria can creep along on their embedded in the mesoglea. Polyp pedal discs at 8-10 cm/hr, pull themselves slender; strobilation of the monodisc by their tentacles, move by peristalsis type. Medusae are found, upside­ through loose sediment, float in currents, down and usually in large congrega­ and even swim by coordinated tentacular tions, on the muddy bottoms of in­ motion. shore bays and ponds. Both subclasses are represented in Ber­ W. STERRER muda. Because the orders are so diverse morphologically, they are often discussed separately. In some classifications the an­ Class Anthozoa (Corals, anemones) thozoan orders are grouped into 3 (not the 2 considered here) subclasses, splitting off CHARACTERISTICS: Exclusively polypoid, sol­ the Ceriantharia and Antipatharia into a itary or colonial eNIDARIA. Oral end ex­ separate subclass, the Ceriantipatharia. panded into oral disc which bears the mouth and Corallimorpharia are sometimes consid­ one or more rings of hollow tentacles. ered a suborder of Scleractinia. Approxi­ Stomodeum well developed, often with 1 or 2 mately 6,500 species of Anthozoa are siphonoglyphs. Gastrovascular cavity compart­ known. Of 93 species reported from Ber­ mentalized by radially arranged mesenteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold-Water Corals Online Appendix: Recent Azooxanthellate Scleractinia
    Cold-water Corals Online Appendix Phylogenetic list of 711 valid Recent azooxanthellate scleractinian species, with their junior synonyms and depth ranges Notes Type species of the genus indicated with an asterisk, valid species names in bold-type Eleven facultatively zooxanthellate species Taxa prefaced with a single square bracket are not valid species and thus are not counted Last revised September 2008 (Stephen D. Cairns) Suborder ASTROCOENIINA FAMILY POCILLOPORIDAE Gray, 1842 Madracis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 *asperula Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849 (facultative, H. Zibrowius, pers. comm..; 0-311 m) pharensis cf. pharensis (Heller, 1868) (facultative; 6-333 m) =?M. cf. pharensis sensu Cairns, 1991: 6 (Galápagos, 30-343 m) =?M. cf. pharensis sensu Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997: 67 (Banda Sea, 85-421 m) asanoi Yabe & Sugiyama, 1936 (110-183 m) =M. palaoensis Yabe & Sugiyama, 1936 kauaiensis Vaughan, 1907 (44-541 m) ?=singularis Rehberg, 1892 ?=interjecta Marenzeller, 1907 var. macrocalyx Vaughan, 1907 (160-260 m) hellana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850 (46 m) myriaster (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849) (37-1220 m) =Stylophora mirabilis Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1860 =Axohelia schrammii Pourtalès, 1874 brueggemanni (Ridley, 1881) (51-130 m) =M. scotiae Gardiner, 1913 profunda Zibrowius, 1980 (112-327 m) [sp. A =sensu Wells, 1954: 414 (Marshall I.) =cf. asperula, sensu Cairns, 1991: 5 (Galápagos, 46-64 m) =sensu Cairns & Keller, 1993:228 (SWIO, 62-160 m) =sensu Cairns, 1994: 36 (Japan, 46-110 m) =sensu Cairns & Zibrowius, 1997: 67 (Philippines, 124-208 m) Suborder FUNGIINA Superfamily FUNGIOIDEA Dana, 1846 FAMILY FUNGIACYATHIDAE Chevalier, 1987 Fungiacyathus (F.) Sars, 1872 *fragilis Sars, 1872 (200-2200 m) (not F. fragilis Keller, 1976 (junior homonym)) =Bathyactis hawaiiensis Vaughan, 1907 paliferus (Alcock, 1902) (69-823 m) =Bathyactis kikaiensis Yabe & Eguchi, 1942 (fossil) =F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Panamic Biota: Some Observations Prior to a Sea-Level Canal
    Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington No. 2 THE PANAMIC BIOTA: SOME OBSERVATIONS PRIOR TO A SEA-LEVEL CANAL A Symposium Sponsored by The Biological Society of Washington The Conservation Foundation The National Museum of Natural History The Smithsonian Institution MEREDITH L. JONES, Editor September 28, 1972 CONTENTS Foreword The Editor - - - - - - - - - - Introduction Meredith L. Jones ____________ vi A Tribute to Waldo Lasalle Schmitt George A. Llano 1 Background for a New, Sea-Level, Panama Canal David Challinor - - - - - - - - - - - Observations on the Ecology of the Caribbean and Pacific Coasts of Panama - - - - Peter W. Glynn _ 13 Physical Characteristics of the Proposed Sea-Level Isthmian Canal John P. Sheffey - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 Exchange of Water through the Proposed Sea-Level Canal at Panama Donald R. F. Harleman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 Biological Results of the University of Miami Deep-Sea Expeditions. 93. Comments Concerning the University of Miami's Marine Biological Survey Related to the Panamanian Sea-Level Canal Gilbert L. Voss - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 Museums as Environmental Data Banks: Curatorial Problems Posed by an Extensive Biological Survey Richard S. Cowan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 A Review of the Marine Plants of Panama Sylvia A. Earle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 Ecology and Species Diversity of
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Suitability and Environmental Niche Comparison of Cold-Water Coral Species Along the Brazilian Continental Margin
    1 Deep-sea Research Part I-oceanographic Research Papers Archimer January 2020, Volume 155 Pages 103147 (12p.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103147 https://archimer.ifremer.fr https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00607/71927/ Habitat suitability and environmental niche comparison of cold-water coral species along the Brazilian continental margin Barbosa Romina 1, 4, *, Davies A. J. 2, 3, Sumida P. Y. G. 4 1 UBO, Lab Sci Environm Marin LEMAR, Plouzane, France. 2 Bangor Univ, Sch Ocean Sci, Anglesey, Wales. 3 Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Biol Sci, Kingston, RI 02881 USA. 4 Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Oceanog, 191 Praca Oceanog, BR-05508120 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. * Corresponding author : Romina Barbosa, email address : [email protected] Abstract : In face of increasing anthropogenic disturbance in the deep sea, it is a priority to better understand the regional distribution of cold-water corals (CWC). These organisms create some of the most species-rich habitats in the deep sea and, for this reason, they must be properly protected and managed. In this study, we aimed to identify suitable habitat for multiple CWC taxa off the Brazilian continental margin and compare their environmental niches. Habitat suitability models were developed using the Maxent approach, which allowed for the prediction of species distribution and for the identification of potential 'hot spot' areas that may be important for biodiversity conservation. Ecological niches were determined by a PCA-env approach, and niche similarity and equivalence were evaluated based on niche overlap using the Schoener's D metric. Potentially suitable habitat for Octocorallia covered a broad latitudinal range encompassing nearly the entire Brazilian continental margin, whereas Scleractinia had greater potentially suitable habitat in the Central and Southern areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Septal Biomineralization in Scleractinia Compared with Their 28S Rrna Phylogeny
    PBlackwell Publishingatterns Ltd. of septal biomineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework JEAN-PIERRE CUIF, GUILLAUME LECOINTRE, CHRISTINE PERRIN, ANNIE TILLIER & SIMON TILLIER Accepted: 2 December 2002 Cuif, J.-P., Lecointre, G., Perrin, C., Tillier, A. & Tillier, S. (2003). Patterns of septal bio- mineralization in Scleractinia compared with their 28S rRNA phylogeny: a dual approach for a new taxonomic framework. — Zoologica Scripta, 32, 459–473. A molecular phylogeny of the Scleractinia is reconstructed from approximately 700 nucleo- tides of the 5′end of the 28S rDNA obtained from 40 species. A comparison of molecular phylogenic trees with biomineralization patterns of coral septa suggests that at least five clades are corroborated by both types of data. Agaricidae and Dendrophylliidae are found to be monophyletic, that is supported by microstructural data. Conversely, Faviidae and Caryophyl- liidae are found to be paraphyletic: Cladocora should be excluded from the faviids, whereas Eusmilia should be excluded from the caryophylliids. The conclusion is also supported by the positions, sizes and shapes of centres of calcification. The traditional Guyniidae are diphyletic, corroborating Stolarski’s hypothesis ‘A’. Some results from our most parsimonious trees are not strongly statistically supported but corroborated by other molecular studies and micro- structural observations. For example, in the scleractinian phylogenetic tree, there are several lines of evidence (including those from our data) to distinguish a Faviidae–Mussidae lineage and a Dendrophylliidae–Agaricidae–Poritidae–Siderastreidae lineage. From a methodological standpoint, our results suggest that co-ordinated studies creating links between biomineralization patterns and molecular phylogeny may provide an efficient working approach for a re- examination of scleractinian classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep‐Sea Coral Taxa in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: Depth and Geographical Distribution
    Deep‐Sea Coral Taxa in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico: Depth and Geographical Distribution by Peter J. Etnoyer1 and Stephen D. Cairns2 1. NOAA Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Charleston, SC 2. National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC This annex to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico chapter in “The State of Deep‐Sea Coral Ecosystems of the United States” provides a list of deep‐sea coral taxa in the Phylum Cnidaria, Classes Anthozoa and Hydrozoa, known to occur in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico (Figure 1). Deep‐sea corals are defined as azooxanthellate, heterotrophic coral species occurring in waters 50 m deep or more. Details are provided on the vertical and geographic extent of each species (Table 1). This list is adapted from species lists presented in ʺBiodiversity of the Gulf of Mexicoʺ (Felder & Camp 2009), which inventoried species found throughout the entire Gulf of Mexico including areas outside U.S. waters. Taxonomic names are generally those currently accepted in the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), and are arranged by order, and alphabetically within order by suborder (if applicable), family, genus, and species. Data sources (references) listed are those principally used to establish geographic and depth distribution. Only those species found within the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone are presented here. Information from recent studies that have expanded the known range of species into the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been included. The total number of species of deep‐sea corals documented for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Identity of Dinoflagellate Symbionts in Caribbean Octocorals
    Coral Reefs (2004) 23: 465-472 DOI 10.1007/S00338-004-0408-8 REPORT Tamar L. Goulet • Mary Alice CofFroth The genetic identity of dinoflagellate symbionts in Caribbean octocorals Received: 2 September 2002 / Accepted: 20 December 2003 / Published online: 29 July 2004 © Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract Many cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea Introduction anemones) maintain a symbiosis with dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae). Zooxanthellae are grouped into The cornerstone of the coral reef ecosystem is the sym- clades, with studies focusing on scleractinian corals. biosis between cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea We characterized zooxanthellae in 35 species of Caribbean octocorals. Most Caribbean octocoral spe- anemones) and unicellular dinoñagellates commonly called zooxanthellae. Studies of zooxanthella symbioses cies (88.6%) hosted clade B zooxanthellae, 8.6% have previously been hampered by the difficulty of hosted clade C, and one species (2.9%) hosted clades B and C. Erythropodium caribaeorum harbored clade identifying the algae. Past techniques relied on culturing and/or identifying zooxanthellae based on their free- C and a unique RFLP pattern, which, when se- swimming form (Trench 1997), antigenic features quenced, fell within clade C. Five octocoral species (Kinzie and Chee 1982), and cell architecture (Blank displayed no zooxanthella cladal variation with depth. 1987), among others. These techniques were time-con- Nine of the ten octocoral species sampled throughout suming, required a great deal of expertise, and resulted the Caribbean exhibited no regional zooxanthella cla- in the differentiation of only a small number of zoo- dal differences. The exception, Briareum asbestinum, xanthella species. Molecular techniques amplifying had some colonies from the Dry Tortugas exhibiting zooxanthella DNA encoding for the small and large the E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Diverging Extant Scleractinian Corals Recovered by Mitochondrial Genomes Isabela G
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The earliest diverging extant scleractinian corals recovered by mitochondrial genomes Isabela G. L. Seiblitz1,2*, Kátia C. C. Capel2, Jarosław Stolarski3, Zheng Bin Randolph Quek4, Danwei Huang4,5 & Marcelo V. Kitahara1,2 Evolutionary reconstructions of scleractinian corals have a discrepant proportion of zooxanthellate reef-building species in relation to their azooxanthellate deep-sea counterparts. In particular, the earliest diverging “Basal” lineage remains poorly studied compared to “Robust” and “Complex” corals. The lack of data from corals other than reef-building species impairs a broader understanding of scleractinian evolution. Here, based on complete mitogenomes, the early onset of azooxanthellate corals is explored focusing on one of the most morphologically distinct families, Micrabaciidae. Sequenced on both Illumina and Sanger platforms, mitogenomes of four micrabaciids range from 19,048 to 19,542 bp and have gene content and order similar to the majority of scleractinians. Phylogenies containing all mitochondrial genes confrm the monophyly of Micrabaciidae as a sister group to the rest of Scleractinia. This topology not only corroborates the hypothesis of a solitary and azooxanthellate ancestor for the order, but also agrees with the unique skeletal microstructure previously found in the family. Moreover, the early-diverging position of micrabaciids followed by gardineriids reinforces the previously observed macromorphological similarities between micrabaciids and Corallimorpharia as
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a New Synthesis of Evolutionary Relationships and Classification of Scleractinia
    J. Paleont., 75(6), 2001, pp. 1090±1108 Copyright q 2001, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/01/0075-1090$03.00 TOWARDS A NEW SYNTHESIS OF EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCLERACTINIA JAROSèAW STOLARSKI AND EWA RONIEWICZ Instytut Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland ,[email protected]., ,[email protected]. ABSTRACTÐThe focus of this paper is to provide an overview of historical and modern accounts of scleractinian evolutionary rela- tionships and classi®cation. Scleractinian evolutionary relationships proposed in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries were based mainly on skeletal data. More in-depth observations of the coral skeleton showed that the gross-morphology could be highly confusing. Profound differences in microstructural and microarchitectural characters of e.g., Mesozoic microsolenine, pachythecaliine, stylophylline, stylinine, and rhipidogyrine corals compared with nominotypic representatives of higher-rank units in which they were classi®ed suggest their separate (?subordinal) taxonomic status. Recent application of molecular techniques resulted in hypotheses of evolutionary relationships that differed from traditional ones. The emergence of new and promising research methods such as high- resolution morphometrics, analysis of biochemical skeletal data, and re®ned microstructural observations may still increase resolution of the ``skeletal'' approach. Achieving a more reliable and comprehensive scheme of evolutionary relationships and classi®cation
    [Show full text]