DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts of Climate Change on Alpine Grassland Ecosystems: Responses in Structure and Function

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts of Climate Change on Alpine Grassland Ecosystems: Responses in Structure and Function Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Impacts of Climate Change on Alpine Grassland Ecosystems: Responses in Structure and Function Author(s): Schmid, Samuel Publication Date: 2017 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000224238 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO. 24075 IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ALPINE GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS: RESPONSES IN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by SAMUEL SCHMID Dipl. Ing.-Agr. ETH, ETH Zurich born on 30.10.1979 citizen of Vordemwald (AG) and Suhr (AG) accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Nina Buchmann Prof. Dr. Andreas Lüscher Prof. Dr. Michael Scherer-Lorenzen 2017 Contents Contents 1 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................................... 11 4 General introduction ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 High elevation life zone ......................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1 Life conditions ............................................................................................................... 15 4.1.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.3 Vegetation and elevational zonation ............................................................................ 17 4.2 Alpine grassland .................................................................................................................... 20 4.2.1 Sward communities in the drought experiment ........................................................... 20 4.2.2 Ecosystem services of alpine grassland ......................................................................... 21 4.3 Study sites ............................................................................................................................. 21 4.3.1 Albula and Furka Pass .................................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Experimental sites and observational areas ................................................................. 23 4.4 Climate change ...................................................................................................................... 26 4.4.1 Global and regional climate change .............................................................................. 26 4.4.2 Climate change impacts on plant communities ............................................................ 26 4.4.3 Drought impacts on grassland ecosystems ................................................................... 27 4.4.4 Effects of climate change on alpine ecosystems ........................................................... 28 4.4.5 Consequences of a warmer climate in alpine ecosystems ............................................ 28 4.4.6 Consequences of a drier climate in alpine ecosystems................................................. 30 4.5 Plant stress ............................................................................................................................ 31 4.5.1 Conceptions of stress .................................................................................................... 31 4.5.2 Drought stress ............................................................................................................... 32 4.5.3 Physiological responses during drought stress ............................................................. 33 4.5.4 Survival of drought stress .............................................................................................. 33 4.6 Drought experiment .............................................................................................................. 35 4.6.1 Experimental design ...................................................................................................... 35 4.6.2 Rainout shelter design and sampling plot ..................................................................... 36 4.6.3 Rainfall manipulation .................................................................................................... 37 4.6.4 Assessment of the drought simulation with micro-meteorological measurements .... 38 1 Contents 4.6.5 Classification of the simulated droughts in relation to climate change scenarios and other drought experiments .......................................................................................................... 41 4.7 Thesis outline ........................................................................................................................ 48 4.8 References ............................................................................................................................ 49 5 Changes in vegetation structure of alpine grassland in response to three years of simulated summer drought are highly site-dependent (Study 1) ......................................................................... 59 5.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 59 5.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 60 5.3 Methods ................................................................................................................................ 63 5.3.1 Study sites ..................................................................................................................... 63 5.3.2 Experimental design and drought simulation ............................................................... 64 5.3.3 Data collection .............................................................................................................. 65 5.3.4 Data analysis ................................................................................................................. 66 5.4 Results ................................................................................................................................... 69 5.4.1 Canopy structure .......................................................................................................... 69 5.4.2 Soil surface structure .................................................................................................... 70 5.4.3 Ground protection (overlay canopy layer, soil surface) ............................................... 70 5.4.4 Vegetation dry matter .................................................................................................. 71 5.4.5 Methods comparison .................................................................................................... 71 5.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 79 5.5.1 Structural variability in alpine grassland....................................................................... 79 5.5.2 Alpine grassland structural responses to summer drought ......................................... 80 5.5.3 Erosion susceptibility in alpine grassland ..................................................................... 85 5.5.4 Non-destructive assessment of structural responses to summer drought in alpine grassland vegetation ..................................................................................................................... 88 5.6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 90 5.7 References ............................................................................................................................ 91 6 Shift from above- to below-ground biomass production in alpine grassland to resist recurring experimental summer droughts (Study 2)............................................................................................ 97 6.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 97 6.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 98 6.3 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 102 6.3.1 Study sites ................................................................................................................... 102 6.3.2 Experimental design and drought simulation ............................................................. 103 6.3.3 Data collection ............................................................................................................ 104 2 Contents 6.3.4 Data analysis ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pages 121-166
    Cost Analysis Figure 21. Estimated Unit Costs for Installation and Maintenance Procedures (2004) Costs are based on average conditions calculated from research plot applications. Costs can vary considerably depending on specific site conditions. These examples are intended for comparison purposes and should not be used as bid prices. Note: Estimated costs do not include bark mulch applied as a continuous bed. If that is the desired treatment, an additional mulch materials and application cost would apply. Estimated costs do not include plant or installation warranties. Enhancing Delaware Highways Cost Analysis 122 Figure 21. Estimated Costs for Installation and Maintenance, for comparison (2004) Drilling holes prior to planting quart containers. Note: Estimated costs do not include bark mulch applied as a continuous bed. If that is the desired treatment, an additional mulch materials and application cost would apply. Estimated costs do not include plant or installation warranties. Enhancing Delaware Highways Cost Analysis 124 Appendix A: Checklists–Inventory of Site Conditions 2. Roadway Limitations Checklist Check the roadside zone(s) included in the location to be landscaped: J Back slope or cut slope J Swale or ditch zone 1. Climate and Growth Conditions Checklist J Approach or shoulder zone J Edge or border zone J Front or fill slope Check the appropriate clear zone requirement: Check the appropriate cold hardiness zone: J Standard 30 feet J Other ( feet) J Zone 6 or J Zone 7 Presence of guard rail and/or barrier curb: Guard rail
    [Show full text]
  • Designing W Grasses Complete Notes
    DESIGNING W/ GRASSES: SLIDESHOW NAMES TONY SPENCER Google search botanical plant names or visit Missouri Botanical Garden site for more info: 1. Pennisetum alopecuroides + Sanguisorba + Molinia arundinacea ‘Transparent’ 2. Pennisetum alopecuroides + Aster + Molinia arundinacea ‘Transparent’ 3. Calamagrostis x. acutiflora ‘Karl Foerster’ + Panicum ‘Shenandoah’ 4. Helianthus pauciflorus – Photo Credit: Chris Helzer 5. Nassella tenuissima + Echinacea simulata + Monarda bradburiana 6. Hordeum jubatum + Astilbe 7. Deschampsia cespitosa + Helenium autumnale 8. Calamagrostis brachytricha + Miscanthus sinensis + Cimicifuga atropurpurea 9. Sporobolus heterlolepis + Echinacea pallida 10. Panicum virgatum + Echinacea pallida + Monarda + Veronica 11. Molinia arundinacea ‘Transparent + Sanguisorba officinalis 12. Bouteloua gracilis 13. Calamagrostis brachytricha + Helenium autumnale 14. Peucedanum verticillare 15. Anemone ‘Honorine Jobert’ 2016 Perennial Plant of the Year 16. Miscanthus sinsensis 17. Calamagrostis brachytricha 18. Molinia caerulea + Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ 19. Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ + Lythrum alatum + Parthenium integrafolium 20. Panicum virgatum ‘Shenandoah’ 21. Bouteloua gracilis + Echinacea ‘Kim’s Knee High’ + Salvia nemorosa 22. Baptisia alba 23. Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ in Hummelo meadow planting 24. Panicum amarum ‘Dewey Blue’ + Helenium autumnale 25. Deschampsia cespitosa 26. Echinacea purpurea seedheads 27. Calamagrostis brachytricha + Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ + Echinacea + Veronicastrum + Eupatorium
    [Show full text]
  • Vercors in Summer
    Vercors in Summer Naturetrek Tour Report 18 - 25 July 2012 Campanula cochlearifolia Common Carpet Short-tailed-Blue Linaria supina Report and images compiled by Paul Harmes & Terry Goble Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 England 0NG T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Vercors in Summer Tour Leaders: Paul Harmes Naturetrek Botanist Terry Goble Naturetrek Ornithologist Participants: Celia Clarke Maggie Conetti Sergio Conetti Dirk Van Gelderen Jaap de Kreek Celia Holmes Jeff Holmes Nicky Lynn Ivan Quail Colin Metherell Sara Shepley Day 1 Wednesday 18th July Weather: Fine, hot and sunny Six group members met Paul and Terry at Gatwick’s North Terminal for the 08.15hrs flight to Lyon. Arriving at 11-00hrs local time, we soon completed passport control and baggage reclaim, and made our way out to the arrivals area, where we met with Maggie and Sergio, who had arrived earlier from Italy. We then boarded the bus to the car rental area. As soon as we had completed these formalities we collected our vehicles for the journey to the Vercors region. We drove westwards, stopping for refreshments at the L'Isle D'Abeau service area. Whilst enjoying lunch we spotted Common Blue butterfly and a juvenile Common Wall Lizard. Just before moving on, we added Scarce Swallowtail and Brimstone. From here, we moved on towards the Grenoble, Isere regional airport, where we explored the lanes and fields to the east and west of the airport. We stopped on a quiet roadside and began to scan the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the ecology of sesleria caerulea (l.) ard. subsp. calcarea Round-Turner, N.L. How to cite: Round-Turner, N.L. (1968) Some aspects of the ecology of sesleria caerulea (l.) ard. subsp. calcarea, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8977/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 "Some aspects of the ecology of Sesleria caenilea (L.) Ard. subsp. calcarea" A dissertation sutaitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology at the l&xiversity of Durham. by N. L. RODND-TUHNER. Durham. September, 1968. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION p. 1 Choice of Study TaxonoDiy p. 1 Distribution p. 2 Chapter 2. THE AIMS AND SCOPE OF THE , STUDY ^ Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Frequent and Typical Plant Communities of the European Alps
    - Alpine Ecology and Environments A guide to frequent and typical plant communities of the European Alps Guide to the virtual excursion in lesson B1 (Alpine plant biodiversity) Peter M. Kammer and Adrian Möhl (illustrations) – Alpine Ecology and Environments B1 – Alpine plant biodiversity Preface This guide provides an overview over the most frequent, widely distributed, and characteristic plant communities of the European Alps; each of them occurring under different growth conditions. It serves as the basic document for the virtual excursion offered in lesson B1 (Alpine plant biodiversity) of the ALPECOLe course. Naturally, the guide can also be helpful for a real excursion in the field! By following the road map, that begins on page 3, you can determine the plant community you are looking at. Communities you have to know for the final test are indicated with bold frames in the road maps. On the portrait sheets you will find a short description of each plant community. Here, the names of communities you should know are underlined. The portrait sheets are structured as follows: • After the English name of the community the corresponding phytosociological units are in- dicated, i.e. the association (Ass.) and/or the alliance (All.). The names of the units follow El- lenberg (1996) and Grabherr & Mucina (1993). • The paragraph “site characteristics” provides information on the altitudinal occurrence of the community, its topographical situation, the types of substrata, specific climate conditions, the duration of snow-cover, as well as on the nature of the soil. Where appropriate, specifications on the agricultural management form are given. • In the section “stand characteristics” the horizontal and vertical structure of the community is described.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Morphology and the Role of Hybridization As Driving Force Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/707588; this version posted July 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Phylogeny, morphology and the role of hybridization as driving force of evolution in 2 grass tribes Aveneae and Poeae (Poaceae) 3 4 Natalia Tkach,1 Julia Schneider,1 Elke Döring,1 Alexandra Wölk,1 Anne Hochbach,1 Jana 5 Nissen,1 Grit Winterfeld,1 Solveig Meyer,1 Jennifer Gabriel,1,2 Matthias H. Hoffmann3 & 6 Martin Röser1 7 8 1 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 9 Garden, Dept. of Systematic Botany, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle, Germany 10 2 Present address: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher 11 Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 12 3 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 13 Garden, Am Kirchtor 3, 06108 Halle, Germany 14 15 Addresses for correspondence: Martin Röser, [email protected]; Natalia 16 Tkach, [email protected] 17 18 ABSTRACT 19 To investigate the evolutionary diversification and morphological evolution of grass 20 supertribe Poodae (subfam. Pooideae, Poaceae) we conducted a comprehensive molecular 21 phylogenetic analysis including representatives from most of their accepted genera. We 22 focused on generating a DNA sequence dataset of plastid matK gene–3'trnK exon and trnL– 23 trnF regions and nuclear ribosomal ITS1–5.8S gene–ITS2 and ETS that was taxonomically 24 overlapping as completely as possible (altogether 257 species).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Genotypical Diversity of Sesleria Albicans (Poaceae) in a Dry Grassland Community
    Biologia, Bratislava, 62/6: 670—674, 2007 Section Botany DOI: 10.2478/s11756-007-0129-x Spatial genotypical diversity of Sesleria albicans (Poaceae) in a dry grassland community Monika Janišová1 &DušanGom¨ ory¨ 2 1Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 14,SK-84523 Bratislava, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University of Zvolen, Masarykova 24,SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Spatial genotypical diversity of Sesleria albicans Kit. ex Schultes was studied in a dry grassland community by isozyme analysis. The aim was to identify the genetical individuals within the studied population and to assess the species’ clonal growth parameters. Vegetative mobility and branching intensity were measured in field for the sake of the correct interpretation of the results. Five isozyme systems were analyzed and interpreted (MDH, MNR, 6-PGDH, SkDH, LAP). Altogether, 98 distinct isozyme profiles were identified within an area of 2 m2. Average genotype identity rapidly decreased with distance. Several very remote ramets (more than 1 m) belonging to the same genet were identified. The longest distance between ramets of the same genotype was 153 cm. With average annual rhizome increment of 13.59 mm assessed for the studied population the age of genet with the most remote ramets exceeded 56 years by a bi-directional growth and 112 years by a growth in single direction. Number of daughter tillers produced by a tiller per year was 0.67 (branching intensity, median) and the median of tiller life span was 2.5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biocenotic Value of Slītere National Park, Latvia, with Special Reference to Inter-Dune Mires
    The biocenotic value of Slītere National Park, Latvia, with special reference to inter-dune mires L. Wołejko1, A.P. Grootjans2,3, M. Pakalne4, L. Strazdiņa4, O. Aleksāns4, S. Elshehawi2 and E. Grabowska1 1Westpomeranian Technological University in Szczecin, Poland 2University of Groningen, The Netherlands 3Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 4University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY Inter-dune wetlands in Europe harbour many Red List species because they are very nutrient-poor ecosystems. Most of these wetlands are geologically very young and no or little peat formation has occurred. In Slītere National Park the numerous inter-dune wetlands are relatively old, up to 4500 years old, and most mire communities are peat forming and they are well preserved. However, the hydrological systems that have conserved the mires are largely unknown. In the present study we analysed 128 vegetation relevées of dune mires in order to assess the variation in ecological mire types. We also carried out several short-time studies to get an insight into the peat development and hydrological conditions that sustain the mires. We describe peat profiles and measured temperature profiles and electrical conductivity in 26 dune valleys. We distinguished three main vegetation units and ten sub-units, representing various stages in peat formation. Based on electrical conductivity and temperature profiles we hypothesised that the mires were sustained by both local and more regional groundwater flows, of which the latter were possibly disturbed by anthropogenic influences, mainly outside the National Park. The importance of the Park was evaluated by comparing it to species lists of wetlands from all countries bordering the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • National Survey of Limestone Pavement and Associated Habitats In
    National survey of limestone pavement and associated habitats in Ireland Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 73 National survey of limestone pavement and associated habitats in Ireland Sue Wilson & Fernando Fernández Ecologic Environmental & Ecological Consultants Ltd. Citation: Wilson, S. & Fernández, F. (2013) National survey of limestone pavement and associated habitats in Ireland. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 73. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Cover photo: Black Head-Poulsallagh Complex SAC © NPWS Keywords: grassland, heath, scrub, conservation status, assessment, invasive species, structure and functions The NPWS Project Officers for this report were: John Cross; [email protected] and Deirdre Lynn, [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & R. Jeffrey © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2013 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Limestone Pavement in Ireland __________________________ Limestone Pavement in Ireland __________________________ Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Limestone pavement in Ireland...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Population Structure of the Scotch Argus Butterfly (Erebia Aethiops) in Britain: Implications for Conservation and Future Reintroductions
    Genetic population structure of the Scotch argus butterfly (Erebia aethiops) in Britain: implications for conservation and future reintroductions Lucy Ritson Gunson This dissertation is submitted for the degree of MSc by Research, Environmental Science June 2019 LEC 1 Dedicated to my late father, Tony Gunson who told me to follow my own path and that my best would always be good enough. Thank you for always being on my side Dad. 2 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisors Dr Rosa Menendez Martinez and Dr Mike Roberts. Lucy Gunson Lancaster University, UK. 3 Acknowledgements Many people helped to make this project possible. Thanks firstly my supervisor Dr Rosa Menendez Martinez for all the ideas, planning, butterfly chasing, analysing and brilliant excel skills. And to my 2nd supervisor Dr Mike Roberts for the great AFLP advice and all his help in the lab. Thanks to those who gave permission for the project: Nicola Evans and Pippa Merricks (Natural England), Craig McCoy (National Trust), Graham Standring (Yorkshire Wildlife Trust), David Oversby (farmer), Andrew Walker (Cumbria Wildlife Trust). And to everyone at Butterfly Conservation UK for their advice and support. Also, Tom Dunbar for help with surveying and great photography, Guy Broome for the invaluable advice and Roy Armstrong for the support.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral State Reconstruction of the Mycorrhizal Association for the Last Common Ancestor of Embryophyta, Given the Different Phylogenetic Constraints
    Supplementary information Supplementary Figures Figure S1 | Ancestral state reconstruction of the mycorrhizal association for the last common ancestor of Embryophyta, given the different phylogenetic constraints. Pie charts show the likelihood of the ancestral states for the MRCA of Embryophyta for each phylogenetic hypothesis shown below. Letters represent mycorrhizal associations: (A) Ascomycota; (B) Basidiomycota; (G) Glomeromycotina; (M) Mucoromycotina; (-) Non-mycorrhizal. Combinations of letters represent a combination of mycorrhizal associations. Austrocedrus chilensis Chamaecyparis obtusa Sequoiadendron giganteum Prumnopitys taxifolia Prumnopitys Prumnopitys montana Prumnopitys Prumnopitys ferruginea Prumnopitys Araucaria angustifolia Araucaria Dacrycarpus dacrydioides Dacrycarpus Taxus baccata Podocarpus oleifolius Podocarpus Afrocarpus falcatus Afrocarpus Ephedra fragilis Nymphaea alba Nymphaea Gnetum gnemon Abies alba Abies balsamea Austrobaileya scandens Austrobaileya Abies nordmanniana Thalictrum minus Thalictrum Abies homolepis Caltha palustris Caltha Abies magnifica ia repens Ranunculus Abies religiosa Ranunculus montanus Ranunculus Clematis vitalba Clematis Keteleeria davidiana Anemone patens Anemone Tsuga canadensis Vitis vinifera Vitis Tsuga mertensiana Saxifraga oppositifolia Saxifraga Larix decidua Hypericum maculatum Hypericum Larix gmelinii Phyllanthus calycinus Phyllanthus Larix kaempferi Hieronyma oblonga Hieronyma Pseudotsuga menziesii Salix reinii Salix Picea abies Salix polaris Salix Picea crassifolia Salix herbacea
    [Show full text]
  • And Rush (Juncaceae) Specimens from Johannes Scheuchzer's Collection at the Herbarium of Natural History Museum Vienna [W] 121- 141 Ann
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 117B Autor(en)/Author(s): Pignotti Lia, Rainer Heimo, Vitek Ernst Artikel/Article: Grass (Gramineae) and rush (Juncaceae) specimens from Johannes Scheuchzer's collection at the Herbarium of Natural History Museum Vienna [W] 121- 141 Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 117 121–141 Wien, Jänner 2015 Grass (Gramineae) and rush (Juncaceae) specimens from Johannes Scheuchzer's collection at the Herbarium of Natural History Museum Vienna [W] L. Pignotti*, H. Rainer* & E. Vitek* Abstract 44 specimens of grasses (Gramineae) and 2 of rushes (Juncaceae) from the herbarium of the Swiss pre-Lin- naean botanist Johannes Scheuchzer (1684–1738) are stored in the collections of the Natural History Museum Vienna [W]. Their historical, botanical and nomenclatural significance is briefly discussed. Key Words: Scheuchzer; Gramineae, Juncaceae; historic collection. Zusammenfassung 44 Belege der Gramineae und 2 der Juncaceae des Schweizer vor-linnéischen Sammlers Scheuchzer wur- den im Herbarium des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien [W] identifiziert. Ihre historische, botanische und nomenklatorische Bedeutung wird diskutiert. Introduction The thoroughness and value of Johannes Scheuchzer's botanical works have made it difficult to believe that botany only represented a minor part of his life. He was born on March the 20th 1684 in Zürich. He travelled, at a very young age, through the Alps with his brother Johann Jacob (1672–1733), who was 12 years his senior and a pioneer palaeobotanist and palaeontologist (STAFLEU & COWAN 1985). He participated in his brother's scientific activities before beginning studies in medicine.
    [Show full text]