Metro and Local Rail Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Metro and Local Rail Strategy Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND POLICY CONTEXT 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Policy and Strategy Context 3 1.3 Network Overview 8 1.4 Overview of Current and Planned Metro Improvements 16 1.5 Benchmarking and Case Studies 17 2 CURRENT AND FUTURE DEMAND 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 Historical and Current Drivers of Demand 20 2.3 Metro Demand Modelling 23 2.4 Impact of Land-use Planning on Future Demand 26 2.5 Metro Demand Study 29 2.6 Demand for Potential Station Sites on Existing Network 30 2.7 Demand for Local Rail Services 32 2.8 Conclusions and Recommendations 34 3 METRO FLEET RENEWAL 35 3.1 Context 35 3.2 Summary and Recommendations 39 4 METRO TECHNICAL OPTIONS APPRAISAL 41 4.1 Introduction 41 4.2 Metro Power Supply and Energy Recovery 42 4.3 Metro Depot Assessment 44 4.4 Signalling and Control 46 4.5 Energy Supply, Efficiency and Renewables 48 4.6 Essential Renewals post-2021 49 5 DELIVERING EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE 50 5.1 Introduction 50 5.2 Customer Satisfaction 51 5.3 Train Service Requirements 53 5.4 Passenger Journeys 54 5.5 Fares and Ticketing 56 5.6 Information Provision 58 5.7 Station Facilities 60 5.8 Park and Ride 61 5.9 Recommendations 63 6 FUTURE OPERATING STRUCTURES 65 6.1 Context 65 6.2 New Metro Operating Structures 66 6.3 Conclusions and Recommendations 70 7 METRO AND LOCAL RAIL NETWORK EXTENSIONS 71 7.1 Potential Extension Corridors 71 7.2 Routes to the Airport 73 7.3 The ‘Leamside line’ 73 7.4 South East Northumberland 74 7.5 Cobalt Corridor 74 7.6 Sunderland re-electrification 75 7.7 South Tyneside Track Dualling 75 7.8 New Routes to and from South Tyneside 76 7.9 New Routes in the Sunderland area 76 7.10 Durham Belmont – Sunderland / South Shields / Newcastle 78 7.11 Team Valley and A1 Gateshead Park and Ride 79 7.12 West Newcastle 79 7.13 Metro to Metrocentre 80 7.14 Local Rail Network Improvements 80 7.15 Network Integration Opportunities 81 7.16 Conclusions and Recommendations 82 8 FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS 84 8.1 Context 84 8.2 Potential Funding Sources 85 8.3 Conclusions and Recommendations 85 9 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 86 APPENDIX 1 CASE STUDIES OF UK URBAN LIGHT RAIL NETWORKS 89 APPENDIX 2 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES 103 APPENDIX 3 NEW FLEET SPECIFICATION 108 TABLES Table 1 2011 Census Mode of Travel to Work 11 Table 2 Metro Passengers by Age 20 Table 3 Tyne and Wear Population 1981 – 2014 21 Table 4 Gross Value Added 1981 – 2011 21 Table 5 Workplace Commuting Trips into Newcastle upon Tyne, 2011 Census 22 Table 6 Workplace Commuting Trips into Sunderland, 2011 Census 22 Table 7 Characteristics of UK Light Rail Networks 24 Table 8 Metrocar Technical Specification 36 Table 9 UK Light Rail Network Service Frequencies 54 Table 10 Estimated Impacts on Metro Patronage and Revenue of Varying Fares Increases 57 Table 11 Journey Purpose of Park and Ride Users 62 Table 12 Operating Arrangements on UK Light Rail Networks 68 CHARTS Chart 1 Projected Metro Demand to 2030 – Current Network 30 Chart 2 Northern Rail Network Patronage Change 2006/07 to 2014/15 33 Chart 3 Train Control Automation Options 46 Chart 4 Metro Passenger Satisfaction Scores 51 Chart 5 Relative Importance of Metro Service Attributes 52 Chart 6 Passenger Satisfaction with Punctuality and Reliability 2010-15 52 Chart 7 Metro Trips by Distance Bands 55 FIGURES Figure 1 Metro Network 2016 9 Figure 2 Annual Metro Passenger Movements 2015 10 Figure 3 2015 Indices of Multiple Deprivation in Tyne and Wear 13 Figure 4 Locations within 400m Walk Distance of Metro Stations 14 Figure 5 Northern Service Network 2016 15 Figure 6 Track Renewals at West Jesmond Metro 17 Figure 7 Existing Metrocar Side View 35 Figure 8 Existing Metrocar Overhead View 36 Figure 9 Metro Service at Airport Station 41 Figure 10 Metro Electrical Sub-station 44 Figure 11 Metro Depot, Gosforth 45 Figure 12 Factors Determining Passenger Satisfaction 53 Figure 13 ‘Longitudinal’ Seating on London Overground Train 55 Figure 14 Metro Smart Ticketing Infrastructure 58 Figure 15 Indicative Future Metro and Local Rail Network 72 Figure 16 Manchester Metrolink Bombardier M5000 Tram 90 Figure 17 Manchester Metrolink Network 2016 90 Figure 18 Stadler Variobahn Tram, Croydon Tramlink 92 Figure 19 Croydon Tramlink Network 92 Figure 20 NET Tram in Nottingham City Centre 93 Figure 21 DLR Train on Segregated Track 95 Figure 22 Docklands Light Railway Network 95 Figure 23 Glasgow Subway Route Map 97 Figure 24 Current Glasgow Subway Rolling Stock 98 Figure 25 Merseyrail Network 98 Figure 26 Merseyrail Class 507 Train 98 Figure 27 Sheffield Supertram Network 100 Figure 28 Tram in Sheffield City Centre 100 Figure 29 Vossloh Tram Train Vehicle 102 Figure 30 Future Supertram network showing tram train extension to Rotherham 102 Figure 31 Flexity Swift Vehicle as used in Rotterdam 108 Section 1: INTRODUCTION AND POLICY CONTEXT 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1. The expansion, improvement and integration of local rail and Metro services is fundamentally important to the economic growth plans of the North East, and is reflected in the Transport Manifesto’s ambitions for rail services. The North East Devolution Agreement commits to: “The Combined Authority producing a business case, for consideration by Government, for investment in the Metro network to 2030, including the upgrade of the Metro fleet, potential expansion, and future integration of the Metro with the rail network”. 1.1.2. A new Metro and Local Rail Strategy is needed to cover the geography of the North East Combined Authority (NECA) area, the integration of local rail and Metro services, and the potential to exploit under-used and disused railway assets and alignments across the region. This strategy builds on earlier work that looked at the Metro network in isolation. Through closer integration with the regional rail network and empowered by the progressive devolution of authority over local rail services, Metro and local rail will deliver a comprehensive network to improve the local economy, environment and society by making rail the travel mode of choice across a wider area of the conurbation. 1.1.3. This strategy outlines plans to enable Metro and local rail to further develop the economy of the NECA area by providing reliable, sustainable transport for people to use to get to work, education, healthcare and leisure facilities. By providing centre-to-centre links avoiding highway congestion, the network will help to redefine the mental map of the region and encourage wider journey to work patterns and travel horizons. This approach has proven successful on networks such as London Overground where the emergence of a prominent, unified network has increased awareness of travel opportunities and helped to increase passenger numbers. 1.1.4. Metro is now at a pivotal point in its existence. Devised in the 1970s as part of a ground-breaking vision to create a unique fusion of underground ‘tube’ and suburban light rail operations, Metro is now moving forward to capitalise on its strengths and meet the future transport needs of the region it serves. This will be achieved by three key developments: A new fleet of trains Essential infrastructure renewals to ensure that the network operates reliably and efficiently Closer integration between Metro and regional rail to extend the scope and reach of the network 1.1.5 The local rail network is also on a path towards positive change, following a long period of stagnation and under-performance resulting from the impacts of infrequent service patterns operated by inadequate rolling stock, and nationally-managed franchises specified and delivered remotely without the energy and attention essential to improve and maintain local product quality. The progressive development of the North East Rail Management Unit (NERMU) under the umbrella of the Rail North framework will result in increasing influence and control over local rail services, expected to lead to full devolved control over the network following the expiry of the current Northern rail franchise in 2025/26. With a new Metro fleet expected to be in service by that date, there is the prospect of a transformational rail offer across the NECA region within 1 the next decade. Work has already started to achieve this and there is much more to do in terms of planning, investment and co-ordination to achieve this vital goal. In combination, a revitalised Metro and local rail network has the capacity to transform how people travel across the region, widening horizons by making it easy to access jobs, training and education and leisure, and connecting the region in a coherent and sustainable way. Investment in Metro and local rail will reduce the wider impact of transport on the environment, and help to improve levels of health. Vision 1.1.6. The vision for the strategy is: “An integrated, modern and sustainable Metro and local rail network for the NECA region that supports the local economy, environment and society” Objectives 1.1.7 The objectives of the Metro and Local Rail Strategy are: (a) To provide reliable, accessible and comfortable Metro and Local Rail services with high levels of customer satisfaction within available resources; (b) To grow the Metro and Local Rail network and their modal share as part of an integrated public transport network; and (c) To achieve value for money. 1.1.8 To help achieve these objectives, the following areas are being developed: • Specify, procure and introduce a new Metro fleet; • Design new operating models and procure suppliers; • Continue essential renewals works for the period 2020-2030; • Expand the Metro and Local Rail network; • Secure short and long-term financial arrangements, and • Improve integration.
Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of North-East Durham and South-East Northumberland
    THE GEOLOGY OF NORTH-EAST DURHAM AND SOUTH-EAST NORTHUMBERLAND. By DAVID WOOLACOTT, D.Sc., F.G.S. Read May 3rd, 1912. CONTENTS. PAGE I.-TABLE OF STRATA 87 II.-THE COAL MEASURES 88 II I.-IGNEOUS DYKES 9 1 I V.-THE PERMIAN SERIES 92 (a) The Yellow Sands . 93 (b) The Marl Slate . 94­ (c) The Magnesian Limestone 94- V.-THE HIATUS 101 Vr.-THE GLACIAL A:;D POST-GLACIAL DEPOSITS. 101 This Paper was prepared for the use of the Members of the Association attending the Whitsuntide Excursion of 1912, and was issued as a Pamphlet. It is now reprinted with a few slight alterations. I.-TABLE OF STRATA. HE Strata which occur in this district belong to the following T divisions in descending order:- S U bm e r ged forest (Whitburn Bay). Deposits of sand and gravel with marine shells (found up to the 150 ft. contour). RECENT A:;D GLACIAL.· ~ Mounds of sand and gravel. Kaims, De r osits of sand, leafy clay and re-asserted boulder clay. lThe stony boulder clay. UPPER PERMIA:; OR Middlesbrough red beds with salt, gypsum THURINGIAN (Der anhydrite and thin fossi liferous magnesian Zechstein). limestonet 300 ft. The Magnesian Limestone up to 800 ft. (Kupferschiefer) The :\1arl Slate 3 ft. MlIllJLE PER~lIAN OR SAXO:<lIAN. The Yellow Sands 0 to ISO ft. LOWER P~:RMIA)l OR ARTINSKIA:; The Yellow Sands? UPPER COAL MEASURES (Not represented.) • The greatest thickness 0' these superficial depesits proved by borings In the Northumberland and Durham Coalfield is 233 ft. at Newton Hall, l'ramwellgate, ncar Durham.
    [Show full text]
  • National Rail Conditions of Travel
    i National Rail Conditions of Travel From 5 August 2018 NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL TABLE OF CONTENTS NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL Part A: A summary of the Conditions 3 Part B: Introduction 4 Conditions 5 Part C: Planning your journey and buying your Ticket 5 Part D: Using your Ticket 11 Part E: Making your Train Journey 15 Part F: Your refund and compensation rights 21 Part G: Special Conditions applying to Season Tickets 26 Part H: Lost Property 29 Appendix A: List of Train Companies to which the National Rail Conditions of Travel apply as at 5 August 2018 30 Appendix B: Definitions 31 Appendix C: Code of Practice: Arrangements for interview meetings with applicants in connection with duplicate season tickets 33 These National Rail Conditions of Travel apply from 5 August 2018. Any reference to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage on websites, Tickets, publications etc. refers to these National Rail Conditions of Travel. Part A: A summary of the Conditions The terms and conditions of these National Rail Conditions of Travel are set out below in Part C to Part H (the “Conditions”). They comprise the binding contract that comes into effect between you and the Train Companies1 that provide scheduled rail services on the National Rail Network, when you purchase a Ticket. This summary provides a quick overview of the key responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers contained in the contract. It is important, however, that you read the Conditions if you want a full understanding of the responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Maintanence Syetems for Metro Railways
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON OPERATIONS AND MAINTANENCE SYETEMS FOR METRO RAILWAYS NOVEMBER 2013 Sub-Committee on Operation & Maintenance Practices Ministry of Urban Development Final Report PREFACE 1) In view of the rapid urbanization and growing economy, the country has been moving on the path of accelerated development of urban transport solutions in cities. The cities of Kolkata, Delhi and Bangalore have setup Metro Rail System and are operating them successfully. Similarly the cities of Mumbai, Hyderabad and Chennai are constructing Metro Rail system. Smaller cities like Jaipur, Kochi and Gurgaon too are constructing Metro Rail system. With the new policy of Central Government to empower cities and towns with more than two million population With Metro Rail System, more cities and towns are going to plan and construct the same. It is expected that by the end of the Twelfth Five Year Plan, India will have more than 400 Km of operational metro rail network (up from present 223 Km Approximate). The National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) has been set up by the Government of India to provide a continuing forum for policy dialogue to energise and sustain the growth of manufacturing industries in India. A meeting was organized by NMCC on May 03, 2012 and one of the agenda items in that meeting was “Promotion of Manufacturing for Metro Rail System in India as well as formation of Standards for the same”. In view of the NMCC meeting and heavy investments planned in Metro Rail Systems, Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD) has taken the initiative of forming a Committee for “Standardization and Indigenization of Metro Rail Systems” in May 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland City Council Highway Maintenance Programme 2021 - 2022
    'This map is based upon the Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnace Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence No. 100018385. Date 2021. SUNDERLAND CITY COUNCIL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAMME 2021 - 2022 101 105 95 239 SOUTHWICK 228 FULWELL 92 REDHILL 104 106 115 111 102 100 115 103 109 118 107 WASHINGTON WEST 110 116 122 108 94 241 WASHINGTON NORTH 95 236 ST PETERS 163 CASTLE 112 164 97 113 119 123 120 165 Usworth 143 93 121 148 114 Castletown Sulgrave Springwell Donwell Concord 162 117 147 98 99 129 144 146 161 127 223 184 145 187 74 158 PALLION 191 180 188 73 70 MILLFIELD 157 125 207 Armstrong 189 67 HENDON WASHINGTON 46 124 48 186 126 71 233 159 75 160 215 65 76 Blackfell 234 170 240 190 68 60 142 181 69 166 Washington 136 ST ANNES Village Barmston 137 208 213 230 65 132 216 61 177 84 154 209 178 211 171 85 Oxclose WASHINGTONGlebe 183 182 173 225 72 156 244 172 214 185 Ashbrooke 243 CENTRAL 41 155 83 134 212 210 224 64 149 Biddick 63 131 B1405 BARNES ST MICHAELS Lambton 130 169 86 133 174 90 59 62 138 91 81 Ayton 175 128 40 193 176 82 35 179 195 150 WASHINGTON SANDHILLSpringwell 200 192 89 Emerson 194 87 EAST SHINEY ROW Grindon 204 WASHINGTON Hastings Hill 226 153 135 197 SOUTH 196 139 140 198 220 SILKSWORTH 43 152 Fatfield 141 Mount Ryhope Colliery Pleasant 44 203 151 201 ST CHADS 202 Penshaw 221 217 RYHOPE West 222 229 Herrington 199 57 218 205 206 42 80 79
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges Over the Tyne Session Plan
    Bridges over the Tyne Session Plan There are seven bridges over the Tyne between central Newcastle and Gateshead but there have been a number of bridges in the past that do not exist anymore. However the oldest current bridge, still standing and crossing the Tyne is actually at Corbridge, built in 1674. Pon Aelius is the earliest known bridge. It dates from the Roman times and was built in the reign of the Roman Emperor Hadrian at the same time as Hadrian’s Wall around AD122. It was located where the Swing Bridge is now and would have been made of wood possibly with stone piers. It last- ed until the Roman withdrawal from Britain in the 5th century. Two altars can be seen in the Great North Museum to Neptune and Oceanus. They are thought to have been placed next to the bridge at the point where the river under the protection of Neptune met the tidal waters of the sea under the protection of Oceanus. The next known bridge was the Medieval Bridge. Built in the late 12th century, it was a stone arched bridge with huge piers. The bridge had shops, houses, a chapel and a prison on it. It had towers with gates a drawbridge and portcullis reflecting its military importance. The bridge collapsed during the great flood of 1771, after three days of heavy rain, with a loss of six lives. You can still see the remains of the bridge in the stone archways on both the Newcastle and Gateshead sides of the river where The Swing Bridge is today.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Vasculum
    THE VASCULUM APRIL, 1967 Vol. LII No. 1. Price 5/per annum, post free. Edited by T. C. DUNN, B.Sc. THE POPLARS, CHESTER-LE-STREET BY THE WAY Secretaries of Societies and other contributors to "The Vasculum" are invited to send their notes to the Editor before 15th June, 1967. OBITUARY NOTICE PROFESSOR JOHN WILLIAM HESLOP HARRISON, D.SC., F.R.S., F.R.S.E. On January 23rd 1967, Professor J. W. Heslop Harrison passed away at the age of 86, at his home in Birtley. After graduating at Armstrong College, University of Durham in 1903, he became a science master at Middlesbrough High School. During these school- teaching years, he carried on with his researches in his spare time. It was not long before his abilities in field studies, in both plants and insects, became widely known. It is not surprising, therefore, to find him returning to the University as a lecturer in zoology in 1919. His subsequent rise to fame was phenomenal. In 1926 he was appointed to a personal Readership in Genetics, the only one there has ever been at Newcastle. In 1927 he was appointed to the Chair of Botany, then in the very next year he gained his greatest distinction by becoming a Fellow of the Royal Society. During all this time and indeed until only a few years ago, research papers flowed from his pen at an unbelievable rate. His name must have appeared in every journal of biological subjects at one time or another. In addition, it must be remembered that he was one of the four founder editors of the "Vasculum" in 1915, one of the founder members of the Wallis Club in 1922, one of the founder members of the Northern Naturalists' Union in 1924 and the first Vice-President of the Naturalists' Trust of Northumberland and Durham.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotork Completes Automation Contract to Assist Decarbonisation at Lynemouth Power Station
    One of the new rail freight wagons for Lynemouth Power Station equipped with Rotork automated pneumatic control systems. Jun 21, 2018 09:00 BST Rotork completes automation contract to assist decarbonisation at Lynemouth Power Station Rotork has completed a contract to supply fully automated pneumatic control systems on high capacity biomass rail freight wagons supporting the decarbonisation project at Lynemouth Power Station in Northumberland. Rail freight manufacturer Astra Rail/Greenbrier Europe and leasing company Nacco have supplied GB Rail freight with 50 hopper wagons to support the biomass haulage contract awarded by Lynemouth Power Ltd. Each with a payload of 70tonnes, these auto-loading and discharging wagons run in two rakes (coupled groups) of 24 between the Port of Tyne and Lynemouth Power Station, delivering 37,000 tonnes of biomass per week. The Rotork design for auto-loading and discharging enables all controls, hand valves and visual indicators to be located in one place, providing safe and convenient access. Top and bottom hopper doors are operated by a magnetic sensor valve from a line side magnet. The innovative design allows any wagon in the rake to be the arming wagon. The fully automated control system enables quicker loading and unloading, requiring only supervision without manual intervention during operation. The proven design also allows for wagons to be separated and used in other rakes without any further configuration. Lynemouth Power Station has generated electricity since 1972. The plant was originally built and operated by Alcan with the purpose of providing safe and secure energy for the production of aluminium at the adjacent Lynemouth Smelter.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for North East Combined Authority
    Leadership Board Tuesday 19th April 2016 at 2.00 pm Meeting to be held at Sunderland Civic Centre, Burdon Road, Sunderland, SR2 7SN www.northeastca.gov.uk AGENDA Page No 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest Please remember to declare any personal interest where appropriate both verbally and by recording it on the relevant form (to be handed to the Democratic Services Officer). Please also remember to leave the meeting where any personal interest requires this. 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting held on 19 January 2016 1 - 8 4. Minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting held on 24 March 2016 9 - 14 5. Updates from Thematic Leads (a) Economic Development and Regeneration 15 - 22 (b) Employability and Inclusion 23 - 32 (c) Transport 33 - 44 6. Financial Update and Treasury Management Annual Review 45 - 68 7. Date and Time of Next Meeting Friday, 13 May 2016 at 3pm at North Tyneside Council (extraordinary meeting) Tuesday, 21 June 2016 at 2pm at Gateshead Council (annual meeting) 8. Exclusion of Press and Public Under section 100A and Schedule 12A Local Government Act 1972 because exempt information is likely to be disclosed and the public interest test against disclosure is satisfied. 9. Implementing the North East JEREMIE 2 Fund Members are requested to note the intention to circulate the above report on a supplemental agenda in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 10. Tyne Pedestrian and Cyclist Tunnels: Tender Report Members are requested to note the intention to circulate the
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-Environmental Desk Study Report the Coal Authority
    Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report The Coal Authority March 2012 Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for The Coal Authority’s information and use in relation to informing the Client of potential geo-environmental site abnormals and constraints for the proposed redevelopment into a minewater treatment facility. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. Document history Job number: 5100028 Document ref: Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Draft for Client Comment MJT TA CS JPB Jan-12 Rev 2.0 Final MJT TA CS JPB Mar-12 Client signoff Client The Coal Authority Project Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Document title Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Job no. 5100028 Copy no. Document Geo-environmental Desk Study Report reference Atkins Geo-environmental Desk Study Report | Version 2.0 | March 2012 Ellington Minewater Treatment Facility Geo-environmental Desk Study Report Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary i 1. Introduction 1 1.1. General 1 1.2. Background 1 1.3. Project References 1 1.4. Information Reviewed 2 1.5. Limitations 2 2. Site Area 3 2.1. Site Location 3 2.2. Site Description 3 2.3. Surrounding Area 3 2.4. Historical Land Use 4 2.5. Previous Ground Investigations 5 3. Geo-environmental Setting 6 3.1. Solid and Drift Geology 6 3.2.
    [Show full text]