DOCSLIB.ORG

Essays-On-The-Essay-Film.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Essays-On-The-Essay-Film.Pdf ESSAYS ON THE ESSAY FILM FILM AND CULTURE ESSAYS ON THE ESSAY FILM EDITED BY NORA M. ALTER AND TIMOTHY CORRIGAN Columbia University Press New York Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex cup.columbia.edu Copyright © 2017 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Alter, Nora M., 1962– editor. | Corrigan, Timothy editor. Title: Essays on the essay film / edited by Nora M. Alter and Timothy Corrigan. Description: New York : Columbia University Press, 2017 | Series: Film and culture | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016040210 (print) | LCCN 2016056155 (ebook) | ISBN 9780231172660 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231172677 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231543996 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Experimental films—History and criticism. | Documentary films—History and criticism. Classification: LCC PN1995.9.E96 E88 2017 (print) | LLC PN1995.9.E96 (ebook) | DDC 791.43/611—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016040210 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America cover design: Lisa Hamm CONTENTS INTRODUCTION NORA M. ALTER AND TIMOTHY CORRIGAN1 PART I. FOUNDATIONS 1. “ON THE NATURE AND FORM OF THE ESSAY” GEORG LUKÁCS21 2. THE MAN WITHOUT QUALITIES ROBERT MUSIL41 3. “ON THE ESSAY AND ITS PROSE” MAX BENSE49 4. “THE ESSAY AS FORM” THEODOR W. ADORNO60 VICONTENTS 5. “PREFACE TO THE COLLECTED ESSAYS OF ALDOUS HUXLEY” ALDOUS HUXLEY83 PART II. THE ESSAY FILM THROUGH HISTORY 6. “THE FILM ESSAY: A NEW TYPE OF DOCUMENTARY FILM” HANS RICHTER89 7. “THE FUTURE OF CINEMA” ALEXANDRE ASTRUC93 8. “BAZIN ON MARKER” ANDRÉ BAZIN102 PART III. CONTEMPORARY POSITIONS 9. “IN SEARCH OF THE CENTAUR: THE ESSAY-FILM” PHILLIP LOPATE109 10. “THE POLITICAL IM/PERCEPTIBLE IN THE ESSAY FILM: FAROCKI’S IMAGES OF THE WORLD AND THE INSCRIPTION OF WAR” NORA M. ALTER134 CONTENTSVII 11. “ESSAY QUESTIONS” PAUL ARTHUR161 12. “THE ELECTRONIC ESSAY” MICHAEL RENOV172 13. “THE ESSAY FILM: PROBLEMS, DEFINITIONS, TEXTUAL COMMITMENTS” LAURA RASCAROLI183 14. “OF THE HISTORY OF THE ESSAY FILM: VERTOV TO VARDA” TIMOTHY CORRIGAN197 15. “THE CINEMA AND THE ESSAY AS A WAY OF THINKING” RAYMOND BELLOUR227 16. “THE ESSAY FILM: FROM FILM FESTIVAL FAVORITE TO FLEXIBLE COMMODITY FORM?” THOMAS ELSAESSER240 PART IV. FILMMAKERS ON THE ESSAYISTIC 17. “PERFORMING BORDERS: TRANSNATIONAL VIDEO” URSULA BIEMANN261 VIIICONTENTS 18. “PROPOSAL FOR A TUSSLE” JEAN-PIERRE GORIN269 19. “THE ESSAY AS CONFORMISM? SOME NOTES ON GLOBAL IMAGE ECONOMIES” HITO STEYERL276 20. “ON WRITING THE FILM ESSAY” LYNNE SACHS287 21. “TRAMP STEAMER” ROSS MC ELWEE292 22. “THE ABCs OF THE FILM ESSAY” HARUN FAROCKI AND CHRISTA BLÜMLINGER297 23. “RIDDLES AS ESSAY FILM” LAURA MULVEY314 24. “CERTAIN OBLIQUENESSES” RENÉE GREEN323 25. “ESSAY DOCUMENTARY: THE DISEMBODIED NARRATOR AND AN UNCLAIMED IMAGE THAT FLOATS THROUGH SPACE AND TIME” REA TAJIRI333 CONTENTSIX 26. “FROM TEN THOUSAND WAVES TO LINA BO BARDI, VIA KAPITAL” ISAAC JULIEN335 Bibliography 345 Contributors 351 Permissions 361 Index 363 ESSAYS ON THE ESSAY FILM INTRODUCTION NORA M. ALTER AND TIMOTHY CORRIGAN Essays have a history as long as human expression itself. For some, the essayistic form has its roots in Platonic dialogues and Roman epistles; for most, Michel de Montaigne and Francis Bacon are the modern forefathers of the genre in their explicit use of the term “essay” in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Perhaps the most commonly agreed-on origin of the essay is the work of Montaigne (1533–1592). For him, the word “essays” emphasizes their provisional and explorative nature as “attempts,” “tries,” or “tests” that produce views of, comments on, and judgments of his falter- ing memory, love, friendship, lying, a “monstrous childe,” and a plethora of other common and uncommon questions picked almost haphazardly from a mind observing the world passing before and through it. Imag- ined, to some extent, as an active intellectual exchange with his deceased friend Étienne de La Boétie, Montaigne’s essays describe not only the con- stant changes and adjustments of a mind as it defers to experience but also the transformation of the essayistic self as part of that process. Over the following centuries, the essay evolved from its literary precedents to include the photographic essays of the twentieth century, from Jacob Riis’s How the Other Half Lives (1890), through James Agee and Walker Evans’s Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (1941), to Martha Rosler’s The Bowery in two inadequate descriptive systems (1974–1975). Currently, the essayistic idea informs museum installations like John Akomfrah’s Unfinished Con- versation (2012) and Isaac Julien’s Ten Thousand Waves (2010), as well as 2INTRODUCTION many digital platforms, including Chris Marker’s Second Life and Kos- inski’s Channel on YouTube. Amid this proliferation, the essay film has emerged as one the its most creative, ubiquitous, and important forms in modern media history. Central to this expansion, the global reach of the contemporary essay film has become well established through films and commentaries from Africa, East Asia, and South Asia. A SHORT HISTORY Even through the relatively short span of the past 120 years of film history, the essay film itself accounts for myriad formal and cultural practices and changing definitions. A case can certainly be made for the early signs of the essayistic genre in the short travelogues, topicals, and lecture films of the late 1890s, as these documentary-style and educational films are less about entertainment and more about the dissemination of information and ideas. A review in 1909 of D. W. Griffith’s A Corner in Wheat, about the capitalist exploitation of the wheat trade, aligns that early film explic- itly with an intervention in the public domain associated with editorials and essays: “The picture . is an argument, an editorial, an essay on a vital subject of deep interest to all. [Yet] no orator, no editorial writer, no essayist, could so strongly and effectively present the thoughts that are conveyed in this picture. It is another demonstration of the force and power of motion pictures as a means of conveying ideas.”1 By the 1920s and 1930s, key film practices begin to appear at the inter- section of documentaries and avant-garde cinema, an intersection that for some scholars and critics lays the groundwork for the essay film. Often noted are Sergei Eisenstein’s early references to the essay film and his unachieved desire to make Marx’s Capital into a political and social science argument on film. By the late 1920s and early 1930s, “city” films, such as Alberto Cavalcanti’s Rien que les heures (1926), Walter Ruttmann’s Berlin: Symphony of a Great City (1927), Dziga Vertov’s Man with a Movie Camera (1929), Jean Vigo’s Apropos of Nice (1930), and Luis Buñuel’s sar- donic travelogue Land Without Bread (1933) begin to ironize, personalize, and aestheticize documentary subjects (daily life in a Russian metropo- lis, the strata of society in a French resort town, and impoverished rural INTRODUCTION3 communities in Spain) in a manner that suggests another focus of the essay film: an oblique cinematic encounter with everyday realities. Even in these early experiments in cinematic representation, many of the defining features of the essay and essay film begin to appear: the blending of fact and fiction, the mixing of art- and documentary-film styles, the foregrounding of a personal or subjective point of view, a focus on public life, a dramatic tension between audial and visual discourses, and a dialogic encounter with audiences and viewers. In the following decades, essay films grow increasingly visible and more commonly defined as cinematic versions of the literary and photo essay. In Listen to Britain (1942) and A Diary for Timothy (1945), film- maker Humphrey Jennings creates versions of the essay film as complex and particularly literary reflections on the public crisis of England during World War II through the lens of a personal voice-over struggling to make sense of that war. In 1948, French filmmaker Alexandre Astruc coins the term caméra-stylo as “a form in which and by which an artist can express his thoughts, however abstract they may be, or translate his obsessions exactly as he does in the contemporary essay or novel.”2 By the 1950s, the Cinématheque français, founded by Henri Langlois in 1936 with filmmaker Georges Franju, becomes the most prominent product of the ciné-club tradition inherited from the 1920s, a tradition that ushered in changes and new directions in the spectatorial dynamics as a dialogic exchange of ideas and commentary between the film and its audience. By 1955, the European confederation Cinéma d’art et d’essai helps to shape what is sometimes called “advanced European art cinema,” and by the mid-1950s, the term essai cinématographique is in frequent use in France. Perhaps most important in the postwar emergence of the essay film, in 1958 the profoundly influential André Bazin famously character- izes Chris Marker’s Letter from Siberia (1958) as a new form of cinema that he designates the essay film. Meanwhile, various new-wave cinemas around the world begin to move away from explorations of alternative narrative forms and to embrace an essayistic reformulation of documentaries and other formats, often in the service of progressive ideologies or politics. French filmmaker and Cahiers du cinéma writer Jacques Rivette cites the groundwork of the Italian neorealist movement and, specifically, Roberto Rossellini as shap- ing a new essayistic perspective on film. Reconfiguring the implications 4INTRODUCTION of the short film in April 1955, Rivette’s essay “Letter on Rossellini” identi- fies a trend that would characterize even longer films as cinematic drafts or sketches. In these films, he argues, “the indefatigable eye of the cam- era invariably assumes the role of the pencil,” so that “a temporal sketch is perpetuated before our eyes.”3 Specifically in Rossellini’s Paisa (1946), Germany, Year Zero (1948), and Europa ’51 (1952), there is “the common sense of the draft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doc Nyc Announces Final Titles Including
    DOC NYC ANNOUNCES FINAL TITLES INCLUDING WORLD PREMIERE OF BRUCE SPRINGSTREEN & THE E STREET BAND’S “DARKNESS ON THE EDGE OF TOWN” CONCERT FILM AT ZIEGFELD THEATER ON NOVEMBER 4TH AND “MOMENTS OF TRUTH” FEATURING ALEC BALDWIN AND OTHER FAMOUS FIGURES DISCUSSING THEIR FAVORITE DOC MOMENTS New York, NY, October 19th 2010 - DOC NYC, New York’s Documentary Festival, announced its final slate of titles including the world premiere of “Darkness on the Edge of Town,” a new concert film with Bruce Springsteen & the E Street Band performing their classic album. The film will screen at the Ziegfeld Theatre on November 4. Directed by the Grammy and Emmy award winner Thom Zimny, the film was shot last year at the Paramount Theatre in Asbury Park, NJ in an unconventional manner without any audience in attendance. Springsteen’s manager Jon Landau has said this presentation “best captures the starkness of the original album.” The film will be released on DVD as part of the box set “The Promise: The Darkness on the Edge of Town Story” later in November. “We wanted to give fans a one night only opportunity to see this spectacular performance on the Ziegfeld’s big screen,” said DOC NYC Artistic Director Thom Powers. A portion of the proceeds from this screening will be donated to the Danny Fund/Melanoma Research Alliance – a non-profit foundation devoted to advancing melanoma research and awareness set up after the 2008 passing of Danny Federici, longtime Springsteen friend and E-Street Band member. DOC NYC will help launch a new promo campaign of shorts called “Moments of Truth,” in which noteworthy figures (actors, politicians, musicians, etc) describe particular documentary moments that moved them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constellation of Avant-Garde Cinemas and My Place in It Kuba
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES ART AND DESIGN News From Elsewhere: A Constellation of Avant-Garde Cinemas and My Place in It Kuba Dorabialski MFA Research Paper School of Art and Design March 2017 1 ORIGINALITY STATEMENT ‘I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribu- tion made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.’ Signed: Date: 27/03/2017 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dublin Gate Theatre Archive, 1928 - 1979
    Charles Deering McCormick Library of Special Collections Northwestern University Libraries Dublin Gate Theatre Archive The Dublin Gate Theatre Archive, 1928 - 1979 History: The Dublin Gate Theatre was founded by Hilton Edwards (1903-1982) and Micheál MacLiammóir (1899-1978), two Englishmen who had met touring in Ireland with Anew McMaster's acting company. Edwards was a singer and established Shakespearian actor, and MacLiammóir, actually born Alfred Michael Willmore, had been a noted child actor, then a graphic artist, student of Gaelic, and enthusiast of Celtic culture. Taking their company’s name from Peter Godfrey’s Gate Theatre Studio in London, the young actors' goal was to produce and re-interpret world drama in Dublin, classic and contemporary, providing a new kind of theatre in addition to the established Abbey and its purely Irish plays. Beginning in 1928 in the Peacock Theatre for two seasons, and then in the theatre of the eighteenth century Rotunda Buildings, the two founders, with Edwards as actor, producer and lighting expert, and MacLiammóir as star, costume and scenery designer, along with their supporting board of directors, gave Dublin, and other cities when touring, a long and eclectic list of plays. The Dublin Gate Theatre produced, with their imaginative and innovative style, over 400 different works from Sophocles, Shakespeare, Congreve, Chekhov, Ibsen, O’Neill, Wilde, Shaw, Yeats and many others. They also introduced plays from younger Irish playwrights such as Denis Johnston, Mary Manning, Maura Laverty, Brian Friel, Fr. Desmond Forristal and Micheál MacLiammóir himself. Until his death early in 1978, the year of the Gate’s 50th Anniversary, MacLiammóir wrote, as well as acted and designed for the Gate, plays, revues and three one-man shows, and translated and adapted those of other authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unknown Known
    BERLINALE SPECIAL THE UNKNOWN KNOWN Errol Morris Über 10 000 Memos schrieb Donald Rumsfeld als Ratgeber von vier USA 2013 US-Präsidenten und Verteidigungsministern an seine Mitarbeiter und 102 Min. · DCP · Farbe · Dokumentarfilm Kollegen. Diese über Jahrzehnte aufgehobenen aufschlussreichen No- tizen bilden die Grundlage für die Annäherung an einen Mann, der die Regie Errol Morris US-amerikanische Außenpolitik und den sogenannten Krieg gegen Kamera Robert Chappell Schnitt Steven Hathaway den Terror entscheidend mitprägte. In einem neutralen Raum bittet Musik Danny Elfman der Filmemacher den umstrittenen Politiker, Platz zu nehmen und ver- Sound Design Skip Lievsay wickelt ihn mit scheinbar banalen Fragen in ein immer brisanter wer- Production Design Ted Bafaloukos, dendes Gespräch. Von Pearl Harbor über Vietnam bis zu 9/11 bezieht Jeremy Landman Geboren 1948 in Hewlett, New York. Studierte Rumsfeld Stellung zum Umgang der USA mit militärischen und po- Produzenten Errol Morris, Philosophie an der University of Wisconsin litischen Fehlern und Katastrophen. Robert Fernandez, Amanda Branson Gill in Madison, der Princeton University und der Mit diesem Film schlägt der Essay- und Dokumentarfilmer Errol Mor- Ausführende Produzenten Dirk Hoogstra, University of California in Berkeley. Außerdem ris ein weiteres Kapitel verdrängter US-Geschichte auf. In STANDARD Julian P. Hobbs, Molly Thompson, Cello bei Nadia Boulanger, bei der auch Philip Diane Weyermann, Jeff Skoll, Tom Quinn, Glass und Quincy Jones Unterricht nahmen. OPERATION PROCEDURE (Wettbewerb Berlinale, 2008) ergründete er die Vorgänge hinter den Folterfotos aus Abu Ghraib. Und schon einmal Jason Janego, Josh Braun, Celia Taylor, Drehte seit 1978 zahlreiche Dokumentarfilme, Angus Wall, Julia Sheehan die sich vorzugsweise mit wissenschaftlichen nahm er einen ehemaligen US-Verteidigungsminister, Robert S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book House
    PETER BLUM GALLERY CHRIS MARKER Born 1921, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France Died 2012, Paris, France SELECTED SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 Chris Marker: Cat Listening to Music. Video Art for Kids, Kunsthall Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway 2018 Chris Marker, Memories of the Future, BOZAR, Bruxelles, Belgium Chris Marker, Memories of the Future, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France Chris Marker, The 7 Lives of a Filmmaker, Cinémathèque Française, Paris, France Chris Marker: Koreans, Peter Blum Gallery at ADAA The Art Show, New York, NY 2016 DES (T/S) IN (S) DE GUERRE, Musée Zadkine, Paris, France 2014 Koreans, Peter Blum Gallery, New York, NY Crow’s Eye View: the Korean Peninsula, Korean Pavilion, Giardini di Castello, Venice, Italy Chris Marker: A Grin Without a Cat, Whitechapel Gallery, London, England; Kunstnernes Hus, Oslo, October 21, 2014 – January 11, 2015; Lunds Konsthall, Lund, February 7 – April 5, 2015 The Hollow Men, City Gallery Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand 2013 Chris Marker: Guillaume-en-Égypte, MIT List Visual Arts Center, Cambridge, MA & the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Memory of a Certain Time, ScotiaBank, Toronto, Canada Chris Marker, Atelier Hermès, Seoul, South Korea The “Planète Marker,” Centre de Pompidou, Paris, France 2012 Chris Marker: Films and Photos, Moscow Photobiennale, Moscow, Russia 2011 PASSENGERS, Peter Blum Gallery Chelsea / Peter Blum Gallery Soho, New York, NY Les Rencontres d'Arles de la Photographie, Arles, France PASSENGERS, Centre de la Photographie, Geneva, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • French New Wave Showcase
    Drafthouse in Richardson are teaming up in September to present a FRENCH NEW WAVE SHOWCASE. A different classic French film will be screened every Saturday afternoon at 4 pm at Alamo. In-person Interviews with Bart Weiss and Dr Frank Dufour (French New Wave expert): Thursday, September 3: Media roundtable from 7:15- 8 pm (This will be the 2nd of 2 Roundtables on Sept 3 - info on the first one follows shortly.) Interviews will take place at La Madeleine near SMU 3072 Mockingbird Ln Dallas, TX 75205-2323 - 214- 696-0800 (We will have the room, which sits behind the order line.) Snacks and drinks will be available, of course. French New Wave Showcase Video Association of Dallas and Alamo Drafthouse Cinema - DFW co-present the French New Wave Showcase Saturday afternoons in September French New Wave, or in French “Nouvelle Vague,” is the style of highly individualistic French film directors of the late 1950s—early ‘60s. Films by New Wave directors were often characterized by fresh techniques using the city streets as character in the films. The New Wave films stimulate discussion about their place in the history of cinema and film. So whether a cinephile or a casual filmgoer, learn more about this distinctly French film movement. French New Wave Showcase, http://videofest.org/french-new-wave- showcase/, presented by the Video Association of Dallas and the Alamo Drafthouse Cinema - DFW, screens every Saturday at 4 pm at Alamo, 100 S Central Expressway, Richardson http://drafthouse.com/calendar/dfw. “The French New Wave was a reaction to the bigness of Hollywood.
    [Show full text]
  • ENG 494: the Essay-Film's Recycling Of
    Nandini Chandra, Study Abroad Application Location Specific Course Proposal The Essay-Film’s Recycling of “Waste”: Lessons from the Left Bank *ENG 494: Study Abroad (3) The essay film shuns the mimetic mode, opting to construct a reality rather than reproduce one. Some of its signature tools in this project are: experimental montage techniques, recycling of still photographs, and the use of found footage to immerse the viewer in an alternative and yet uncannily plausible reality. Chris Marker, Alain Resnais, and Agnes Varda are three giants of this genre who shaped this playful filmic language in France. The essay-film is their paradoxical contribution to crafting a collective experience out of the minutiae of individual self-expressions. Our course will focus particularly on this trio of directors’ self-reflexive and heretical relationship with the theme of “waste”— industrial, cultural and human—which forms a central preoccupation in their films. Many of these films use the trope of travel to show wastelands created by the history of capitalist wars and colonialism. We will examine the diverse ways in which the essay-film alters our understanding of “waste” and turns it into something mysteriously productive. This in turn leads us to the question of the “surplus population”—those thrown out of the circuits of capitalist production and left to fend for themselves—as a source of potentially utopian possibilities. Capitalism’s well-known “creative destruction” is ironically paralleled by these films’ focus on the productivity of waste products, and the creative powers of capitalism’s outcastes. 1. The course will historiciZe the critical-lyrical practice of the essay-film, looking at the films themselves as well as key scholarship on essay-films.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema in Dispute: Audiovisual Adventures of the Political Names ‘Worker’, ‘Factory’, ‘People’
    Cinema In Dispute: Audiovisual Adventures of the Political Names ‘Worker’, ‘Factory’, ‘People’ Manuel Ramos Martínez Ph.D. Visual Cultures Goldsmiths College, University of London September 2013 1 I declare that all of the work presented in this thesis is my own. Manuel Ramos Martínez 2 Abstract Political names define the symbolic organisation of what is common and are therefore a potential site of contestation. It is with this field of possibility, and the role the moving image can play within it, that this dissertation is concerned. This thesis verifies that there is a transformative relation between the political name and the cinema. The cinema is an art with the capacity to intervene in the way we see and hear a name. On the other hand, a name operates politically from the moment it agitates a practice, in this case a certain cinema, into organising a better world. This research focuses on the audiovisual dynamism of the names ‘worker’, ‘factory’ and ‘people’ in contemporary cinemas. It is not the purpose of the argument to nostalgically maintain these old revolutionary names, rather to explore their efficacy as names-in-dispute, as names with which a present becomes something disputable. This thesis explores this dispute in the company of theorists and audiovisual artists committed to both emancipatory politics and experimentation. The philosophies of Jacques Rancière and Alain Badiou are of significance for this thesis since they break away from the semiotic model and its symptomatic readings in order to understand the name as a political gesture. Inspired by their affirmative politics, the analysis investigates cinematic practices troubled and stimulated by the names ‘worker’, ‘factory’, ‘people’: the work of Peter Watkins, Wang Bing, Harun Farocki, Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronobesh Ranjan Chakraborty, Assistant Professor, S.K.C School of English and Foreign Languages, Deptt
    ISSN 2321 - 4805 www.thespianmagazine.com THESPIAN MAGAZINE An International Refereed Journal of Inter-disciplinary Studies Santiniketan, West Bengal, India DAUL A Theatre Group©2020 Vol. 6, Issue 1, 2020 Autumn Edition (September-October) MLA Citation Chakraborty, Pronobesh Ranjan “The New Wave in French Cinema (1959-1968): A Critical Study”. Thespian Magazine 6.1 (2020): n.pag. Thespian Magazine 2 The New Wave in French Cinema (1959-1968): A Critical Study Dr.Pronobesh Ranjan Chakraborty, Assistant Professor, S.K.C School of English and Foreign languages, Deptt. of French, Assam University, Silchar, Assam. India Introduction When the 1959 Cannes Film Festival rewarded Les Quatre Cents Coups by François Truffaut and Hiroshima, Mon Amour by Alain Resnais, it not only confirmed the arrival of new cinema but also of a new generation. Within a span of few years around 1958-1962, almost thirty young directors who were less than thirty came into prominence by their sheer brilliance and have left behind a significant body of work, almost a treasure trove, for the later generations. It suffices to judge by some of the first feature films made by them from 1958 onwards, like Les Amants by Louis Malle , Lettre de Sibérie by Chris Marker. 1959 : Le Beau Serge by Claude Chabrol , Moi, Un Noir by Jean Rouch , Les Dragueurs by Jean-Pierre Mocky, Les Quatre Cents Coups by Truffaut, Hiroshima, Mon Amour by Alain Resnais. 1960: L’Eau à la Bouche by Jacques Doniol-Valcroze , A Bout de Souffle by Jean-Luc Godard , Le Bel-Age by Pierre Kast. 1961: Lola by Jacques Demy , Le Propre de l’Homme by Claude Lelouch, Paris Nous Appartient by Jacques Rivette.
    [Show full text]
  • CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague Et Nouveaux Cinémas Contenu Et
    Département de littérature, théâtre et cinéma Professeur : Jean-Pierre Sirois-Trahan Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines Session : Hiver 2020 CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague et nouveaux cinémas Local du cours : CSL-1630 Horaire : Mercredi, 15h30-18h20 Projection : Mercredi, 18h30-21h20 (CSL-1630) Téléphone : 418-656-2131, p. 407074 Bureau : CSL-3447 Courriel : [email protected] Site personnel : https://ulaval.academia.edu/JeanPierreSiroisTrahan Contenu et objectifs du cours Dans l’histoire du cinéma mondial, la Nouvelle Vague (française) peut être considérée comme l’un des événements majeurs, de telle façon que l’on a pu dire qu’il y avait un avant et un après. Deuxième moment de la modernité au cinéma après le néoréalisme italien, son avènement au tournant des années soixante a profondément changé la donne esthétique de l’art cinématographique, et ce jusqu’à aujourd’hui. L’une des caractéristiques les plus essentielles de ce mouvement fut de considérer le cinéma, dans l’exercice même de sa praxis, de façon critique, cinéphile et réflexive. Groupée autour de la revue des Cahiers du Cinéma, cofondée par André Bazin, la Nouvelle Vague est souvent réduite à un groupe de critiques passés à la réalisation : Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, Pierre Kast, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze et Marilù Parolini (scénariste). Aussi, il ne faudrait pas oublier ceux que l’on nomma le « groupe Rive gauche » : Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Jacques Demy, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Henri Colpi et Jacques Rozier. On peut aussi y rattacher un certain nombre d’outsiders importants, soit immédiatement précurseurs (Jean- Pierre Melville, Georges Franju, Jean Rouch et Alexandre Astruc), soit continuateurs à l’esthétique plus ou moins proche (Marguerite Duras, Jean-Marie Straub et Danièle Huillet, Paula Delsol, Maurice Pialat, Jean Eustache, Chantal Akerman, Philippe Garrel, Jacques Doillon, Catherine Breillat, Danièle Dubroux et André Téchiné).
    [Show full text]
  • A Mode of Production and Distribution
    Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954.
    [Show full text]