A Simple Method of Projecting Mach Bands, Color Mixtures, and Variable Contrast Sinusoidalgratings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Perceptual Assignment of Opacity to Translucent Surfaces: the Role of Image Blur
Perception, 2002, volume 31, pages 531 ^ 552 DOI:10.1068/p3363 Perceptual assignment of opacity to translucent surfaces: The role of image blur Manish Singhô, Barton L Anderson Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Received 20 June 2000, in revised form 19 June 2001 Abstract. In constructing the percept of transparency, the visual system must decompose the light intensity at each image location into two componentsöone for the partially transmissive surface, the other for the underlying surface seen through it. Theories of perceptual transparency have typically assumed that this decomposition is defined quantitatively in terms of the inverse of some physical model (typically, Metelli's `episcotister model'). In previous work, we demon- strated that the visual system uses Michelson contrast as a critical image variable in assigning transmittance to transparent surfacesönot luminance differences as predicted by Metelli's model [F Metelli, 1974 Scientific American 230(4) 90 ^ 98]. In this paper, we study the contribution of another variable in determining perceived transmittance, namely, the image blur introduced by the light-scattering properties of translucent surfaces and materials. Experiment 1 demonstrates that increasing the degree of blur in the region of transparency leads to a lowering in perceived transmittance, even if Michelson contrast remains constant in this region. Experiment 2 tests how this addition of blur affects apparent contrast in the absence of perceived transparency. The results demonstrate that, although introducing blur leads to a lowering in apparent contrast, the magnitude of this decrease is relatively small, and not sufficient to explain the decrease in perceived transmittance observed in experiment 1. -
AC 150/5320-5C, Surface Drainage Design, September 29, 2006
UFC 3-230-01 AC 150/5320-5C 8/1/2006 9/29/2006 CHAPTER 7 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 7-1 GENERAL. Certain appurtenant structures are essential to the proper functioning of every storm drainage system. These structures include inlet structures, manholes, and junction chambers. Other miscellaneous appurtenances include transitions, flow splitters, siphons, and flap gates. Many agencies have developed their own design standards for commonly used structures; therefore, it is to be expected that many variations will be found in the design of even the simplest structures. The information in this chapter is limited to a general description of these structures with special emphasis on the features considered essential to good design. 7-2 INLETS. The primary function of an inlet structure is to allow surface water to enter the storm drainage system. As a secondary function, inlet structures also serve as access points for cleaning and inspection. The materials most commonly used for inlet construction are cast-in-place concrete and pre-cast concrete. The structures must ensure efficient drainage of design storm runoff to avoid interruption of operations during or following storms and to prevent temporary or permanent damage to pavement subgrades. The material, including the slotted drain corrugated metal pipe to handle surface flow (if employed), should be strong enough to withstand the loads to which it will be subjected. 7-2.1 Configuration. Inlets are structures with inlet openings to receive surface water. Figure 7-1 illustrates several typical inlet structures, including a standard drop inlet (area inlet), catch basin, curb inlet, and combination inlet. The hydraulic design of surface inlets is covered in detail in Chapter 3. -
Spatial Vision: from Spots to Stripes Clickchapter to Edit 3 Spatial Master Vision: Title Style from Spots to Stripes
3 Spatial Vision: From Spots to Stripes ClickChapter to edit 3 Spatial Master Vision: title style From Spots to Stripes • Visual Acuity: Oh Say, Can You See? • Retinal Ganglion Cells and Stripes • The Lateral Geniculate Nucleus • The Striate Cortex • Receptive Fields in Striate Cortex • Columns and Hypercolumns • Selective Adaptation: The Psychologist’s Electrode • The Development of Spatial Vision ClickVisual to Acuity: edit Master Oh Say, title Can style You See? The King said, “I haven’t sent the two Messengers, either. They’re both gone to the town. Just look along the road, and tell me if you can see either of them.” “I see nobody on the road,” said Alice. “I only wish I had such eyes,” the King remarked in a fretful tone. “To be able to see Nobody! And at that distance, too!” Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass Figure 3.1 Cortical visual pathways (Part 1) Figure 3.1 Cortical visual pathways (Part 2) Figure 3.1 Cortical visual pathways (Part 3) ClickVisual to Acuity: edit Master Oh Say, title Can style You See? What is the path of image processing from the eyeball to the brain? • Eye (vertical path) . Photoreceptors . Bipolar cells . Retinal ganglion cells • Lateral geniculate nucleus • Striate cortex ClickVisual to Acuity: edit Master Oh Say, title Can style You See? Acuity: The smallest spatial detail that can be resolved. ClickVisual to Acuity: edit Master Oh Say, title Can style You See? The Snellen E test • Herman Snellen invented this method for designating visual acuity in 1862. • Notice that the strokes on the E form a small grating pattern. -
Contrast Sensitivity Function of Sine-Wave Gratings in Children With
PSYCHOLOGY Psychology & Neuroscience, 2009, 2, 1, 11 - 15 NEUROSCIENCE DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.03 Contrast sensitivity function of sine-wave gratings in children with acute malnutrition Natanael Antonio dos Santos, Caroline Costa Gomes Alencar and Yuri Henrique Nunes Dias Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the contrast sensitivity curves of sine-wave gratings with spatial frequencies of 0.25, 1.0, 2.0 and 8.0 cycles per degree (cpd) of visual angle in 16 female subjects aged 7 to 9 years old, eight well-nourished and eight with acute protein-energy malnutrition (PEM). All participants had normal visual acuity and were free of identifiable ocular illness. Contrast threshold was measured using a temporal two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical method, at a distance of 150 cm of the stimuli, binocularly, with mean luminance of 40.1 cd/m2. We detected a general decline in contrast sensitivity for children with acute malnutrition at all spatial frequencies compared to well-nourished children. The malnourished group needed in average 1.37 times more contrast to detect the stimulus in comparison with the well-nourished one. Differences between the groups were statistically significant at all spatial frequencies (p < .001). These results suggest that acute PEM changes the visual perception for sine-wave gratings.Keywords: visual perception, contrast sensitivity, spatial frequency, malnourished children, psychophysical method. Received 14 September 2008; received in revised form 1 June -
Gratings: Amplitude, Phase, Sinusoidal, Binary
Today • Gratings: – Sinusoidal amplitude grating – Sinusoidal phase grating – in general: spatially periodic thin transparency Wednesday • Fraunhofer diffraction • Fraunhofer patterns of typical apertures • Spatial frequencies and Fourier transforms MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 1 Gratings Amplitude grating Phase grating 1 1 0.75 0.75 | [a.u.] | [a.u.] t 0.5 t 0.5 |g |g 0.25 0.25 0 0 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 x [λ] x [λ] pi pi pi/2 pi/2 ) [rad] t ) [rad] t 0 0 −pi/2 phase(g −pi/2 phase(g −pi −pi −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 x [λ] x [λ] Λ: period; m: contrast; φ: phase shift Λ: period; m: phase contrast; φ: phase shift MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 2 Gratings Amplitude grating Phase grating x x y z y z MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 3 Sinusoidal amplitude grating … OPLD = Λsin θ constructive interference if OPLD = qλ (q integer) st +1 order Only the n=0th and n=±1st diffraction orders are generated The n=0th diffraction order Λ θ is also known as the DC term incident –θ plane wave −1st order u : Grating 0 spatial … period frequency MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 4 Sinusoidal amplitude grating … +1st order Λ θ 0th order (or DC term) incident –θ plane diffraction angle wave -1st order spatial frequency … diffraction efficiencies MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 5 Sinusoidal phase grating s q=+5 “surface relief” grating q=+4 Transmission function q=+3 Λ q=+2 q=+1 (n 1)s m 2π − ≡ λ q=0 “phase contrast” incident q= –1 plane Useful math property: wave q= –2 + ∞ q= –3 exp iα sin (θ) = Jq (α) exp (iqθ) q= ! " #−∞ q= –4 st Jm: Bessel function of 1 kind, q= –5 m-th order glass refractive index n MIT 2.71/2.710 04/06/09 wk9-a- 6 Sinusoidal phase grating s q=+5 Field after grating is expressed as: q=+4 q=+3 Λ amplitude q=+2 q=+1 q=0 plane waves (diffraction orders), propagation angle incident q= –1 plane wave q= –2 q= –3 The q-th exponential physically is q= –4 a plane wave propagating at angle θq q= –5 i.e.