Seabirds 162° 70° 160° 71° 158° Inaru Er Sisgravik Lake 156° 71° R R Iv Across the Arctic Coastal Plain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seabirds 162° 70° 160° 71° 158° Inaru Er Sisgravik Lake 156° 71° R R Iv Across the Arctic Coastal Plain 71° 162° 160° 158° 72° U LEGEND 12N 42W Ch u $ North Slope Planning Area ckchi Sea Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Pingasagruk (abandoned) WAINWRIGHT Atanik (Abandoned) Naval Arctic Research Laboratory USGS 250k Quad Boundaries U Point Barrow I c U Point Belcher 24N Township Boundaries y 72° Akeonik (Ruins) Icy Cape U 17W C 12N Browerville a Trans-Alaska Pipeline p 39W 22N Solivik Island ¢[¢[ e Akvat !. P Ikpilgok 20W Barrow Secondary Roads (unpaved) a Asiniak!. Point s ¢[ MEADE RIVER s !. !. Plover Point !. Wainwright ¢[ Point Franklin Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memorial !. Brant Point U !. Seabird Interpolated Density Distribution Point Collie 1 Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake From Aerial Surveys (USFWS) ¢[ Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !. Kugrua BayEluksingiak Point Seahorse Islands 42W Kasegaluk Lagoon West Twin TekegakrokLake Point ak Pass Sigeakruk Point uitk 2 A Mitliktavik (Abandoned) Peard Bay l Class 1, lowest density of all species, Birds per km ¢[ U Ikroavik Lake E Tapkaluk Islands k Wainwright Inlet o P U l 12N k U i i e ¢[ a e n U r 2 Avak Inlet Avak Point k 36W g C 16N 22N Class 2, one or more species more dense than class 1, Birds per km a o Karmuk Point Tutolivik n U Elson Lagoon t r !. u !. a a !. 14N m 29W 17W t r 17N u W Nivat Point o g P 32W Av 2 k ¢[ a a Nokotlek¢[ Point !. 26W Nulavik Class 3, one or more species more dense than class 2, Birds per km l A s P v a a s Nalimiut Point k a k MEADE RIVER p R s Pingorarok Hill BARROW U a Scott Point i s r Akunik Pass Kugachiak Creek v ve 2 e i !. R 9N R W Tachinisok Inlet Class 4, one or more species more dense than class 3, Birds per km r A k Kimouksik Lake Avak Bay 70° l i O a o a Sikolik Lake t kr v l Tungaich Point 39W n Skull Cliff e i ak Entrance Tungak Creek g Agiak Point k r lukru 2 o U A ki C Sukok Lake v E T r A a Ross Point Class 5, Highest Density of One or More Species, Birds per km a u pi r k k k e WAINWRIGHT n Nokotlek River u 19N C v gu e r CooperU Island a i ru k e lik k ak Cr 20W e ¢[ POINT LAY POINT ee U k Plover Islands 2 R k Kilusiktok Lake Tulageak Point22N Seabird Nesting Colony Locations May-Auguest (NOAA) i R U ver 17N Sungovoak, Lake i Evrulivik Lake 14W 7N v Kilich Point Tractor Lake e Tuvak Lake 23W ¢[ 0-100 Birds, Arctic Tern or Glaucous Gull r Martin Island 41W U Kupluruak Point Kachiksuk Bluffs Ku K Itinik Lake 8N n u ¢[ go g Lake Tusikvoak Christie Point¢[ 100-1000 Birds, Arctic Tern U k r 39W U U R u N 11N i a ik Reindeer Lake s v l Pas 9N 13N K R a e v uak ¢[ 0-1000 Birds, Horned Puffin 33W o r i i r r v e l k U ga 36W v 29W e Keo Point i ip C ni R r re a k s ek Ekalgruak Lake19N S All legend items may not appear on each map tile UTUKOK RIVER a un U Inaru Rive li C r I a U 17W v Omalik River r 14N i e e s g e i 17N BARROW a k 26W Dease Inlet NOTES Puknikruk k r !.Kikikausgruak Island i u 20W RIVER MEADE 1 k M Coverage shows the average relative density of various species of seabirds 162° 70° 160° 71° 158° Inaru er Sisgravik Lake 156° 71° R R iv across the arctic coastal plain. Densities were calculated using aerial flight iv Black Head e r observations collected between 2007 and 2010. Annual flights were flown with I r a an average observation date of June 15th and an average duration of 9 days. eek McTavish Point Tiny Island Cr k Seabirds surveyed include Arctic Tern, Glaucous Gull, Jaeger, and Sabines Gull. ak C he r k 72° 156° Ikpitc e 154° e 152° 71° Anaktuk (Abandoned) e re k Oarlock Island C iver TESHEKPUK !. eak R For each species, birds per square kilometer of area searched was calculated for U Kuch e d grid cells of 100 square kilometers covering the survey area. A triangulated Katrikiorak Creek U a Admiralty Bay 24N e irregular network was formed from these estimated density points, which was B 19N Meade R M Wright Point 17W Natvakrak Lakes e ive then sampled to a grid with points every 100 meters. Finally, the grid was 72° au 2W r ss f Sea $ converted to a polygon coverage portraying 5 density classes based on a natural Plover Point a Tapkaluk Islands Jamesway Huts (Abandoned) KaolakKangik River (Abandoned) ort Point Barrow k P Avalik River U breaks classification. For each species the graduated shading of the 5 density a k !. Takrak Lake t !. Ketik River 21N i er classes from green to red shows the lowest density of birds to the highest density u iv l e Adrigigon Creek TESHEKPUKR nc U 10W ik of birds. E ra s NU tuv nt 22N s Oyagaruk Creek igis ak Brant Point E a 19N Ikmakrak Lake Elson Lagoon k P Kigakrak Cooper14W IslandMartin Island O a k 5W Shown here is a graphical conglomeration of the densities for all seabird breeds u ¢[ a !. k r u ¢[ Igalik Island p Esook Trading Post (Abandoned) C surveyed, for each location in the survey area, the highest density rating found Tekegakrok Point k r Atqasuk i B u a l Kulgurak Island e a h i Omikmuktusuk River !. k Plover Islands g !. a e Scott Point Pogik Point i among the species is shown. k i u S p ¢[ Tulimanik IslandReindeer Service USDI Cabins (Abandoned) k s f t E n Cameron Point or U Avak BayRoss Point Ikiak e a !. a p HARRISON BAY e HARRISON Naval Arctic Research Laboratory TulageakKachiksuk PointChristie Bluffs Point Napanik Creek Pitt Point !. r k Thetis Island S ¢[ !. West Twin Lake R Browerville R BARROW C Cape Halkett U U 22N !. i For example, red areas represent sites where one or more of the species have the i Tangent Point v k v Avalitkok Creek s !. e Pogik Bay e a u Barrow 17W 19N r r highest densities of birds (density class 5) and dark orange areas represent sites k k u t 8W S K u Kokruagarok k where one or more of the species have a density class 4, while the green areas !. m Ikroavik Lake i Dease Inlet t R represent sites where all species have a density class of 1. The higher density h Emaiksoun Lake i U v Reindeer Lake R e classes represent geographic areas that are more important to birds of one or Avatanak Bight r 22N Kolovik (abandoned) i 71° Black Head Sinclair LakeU ve U more surveyed species. (Waterfowl Branch, Migratory Bird Management, U.S. 20W TESHEKPUK r Avak Creek Kurgorak Bay 19N Cape Simpson McLeod Point 16N Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 7, Anchorage Alaska) 11W 2W Okalik Lake Harrison Bay 2 Nesting colonies include those mapped for Arctic Tern, Glaucous Gull and Drew Point Naluakruk Lake k U Horned Puffin. (Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas Coastal and Ocean Zones Smith Bay e Lake Tusikvoak e Kimouksik Lake r Strategic Assessment: Data Atlas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Tiny Island 13N U C r Delta U T 5E ive Administration, November 1988) Eskimo Islands o R a e 16N k Atigaru Point p ill W 19N ro a lv Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memoriala 5W ik g o la Sungovoak, Lake Point Poleakoon P Saktuina Point Tolaktovut Point C 14W K o k BARROW !. ¢[ p U Anakruak o r a MEADE RIVER u w Wright Point k S R McTavish Point l Sukok Lake 19N a a Imakruak Lake R i k k v U 17W Oarlock Island U i o e C v r U s o e Evrulivik Lake r u e 13N r n k amayay e T t a r 16N N a k Anajuk Point e k u e C 2E ch n v k M i e h TESHEKPUK 8W li i U Ekalgruak Lake Admiralty Bay R g a lu r Sisgravik Lake R k C han n v e k C K e i n Nulavik 19N v n a !. u v i e a c s Pisiksagiavik Creek h e l c DISCLAIMER a e l h h R i r a emach 20W u P Ri R r BARROW r a n Thisve atlas is a graphicaliv representation of digital data from multiple sources. Not In U e Alaktak U ne r er C v U U l Kilusiktok Lake h i M all features indicated on this map have been constructed or physically located. 17N i !. 16N igua 13N R k p iak 14N 14W p R k 11W River 2W This atlas is a reference document only and is not intended to be used for iv a 5W MEADE RIVER e t Teshekpuk Lake navigation. The State of Alaska Makes no expressed or implied warranties with r k Oil Lake ver a 71° i l respect to the character, function, accuracy, or capabilities of this product or its Tractor Lake R U A U u ver appropriateness for any user's purposes.
Recommended publications
  • Beaufort Seas West To
    71° 162° 160° 158° 72° U LEGEND 12N 42W Ch u $ North Slope Planning Area ckchi Sea Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Pingasagruk (abandoned) WAINWRIGHT Atanik (Abandoned) Naval Arctic Research Laboratory USGS 250k Quad Boundaries U Point Barrow I c U Point Belcher 24N Township Boundaries y 72° Akeonik (Ruins) Icy Cape U 17W C 12N Browerville a Trans-Alaska Pipeline p 39W 22N Solivik Island e Akvat !. P Ikpilgok 20W Barrow Secondary Roads (unpaved) a Asiniak!. Point s MEADE RIVER s !. !. Plover Point !. Wainwright Point Franklin !. Brant Point !. Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memorial Whales1 U Point Collie Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !. Kugrua BayEluksingiak Point Seahorse Islands Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (June-September) 42W Kasegaluk Lagoon West Twin TekegakrokLake Point ak Pass Sigeakruk Point uitk A Mitliktavik (Abandoned) Peard Bay l U Ikroavik Lake E Tapkaluk Islands k Wainwright Inlet o P U Bowhead Whale, Major Adult Area (May) l 12N k U i i e a n U re Avak Inlet Avak Point k 36W g C 16N 22N a o Karmuk Point Tutolivik n U Elson Lagoon t r !. u a White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (September) !. a !. 14N m 29W 17W t r 17N u W Nivat Point o g P 32W Av k a a Nokotlek Point !. 26W Nulavik l A s P v a a s Nalimiut Point k a k White (Beluga) Whale, Major Adult Area (May-September) MEADE RIVER p R s Pingorarok Hill BARROW U a Scott Point i s r Akunik Pass Kugachiak Creek v ve e i !.
    [Show full text]
  • Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003 Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area January 2020 Authors: Zhen Li Caryn Smith In-House Document by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Division of Environmental Sciences Sterling, VA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Headquarters This page intentionally left blank. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Oil Spill Risk Analysis web page (https://www.boem.gov/environment/environmental- assessment/oil-spill-risk-analysis-reports). CITATION Li Z, Smith C. 2020. Oil Spill Risk Analysis: Conditional Probabilities for the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Sterling (VA): U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Report BOEM 2020-003. 130 p. ABOUT THE COVER This graphic depicts the study area in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and boundary segments used in the oil spill risk analysis model for the the Beaufort Sea Planning Area. Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS
    VOLUME 1. MARINE MAMMALS, MARINE BIRDS VOLUME 2, FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL VOLUME 3, EFFECTS, CHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 4. GEOLOGY, ICE, DATA MANAGEMENT Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf July - Sept 1976 quarterly reports from Principal Investigators participatingin a multi-year program of environmental assessment related to petroleum development on the Alaskan Continental Shelf. The program is directed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Land Management. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES Boulder, Colorado November 1976 VOLUME 1 CONTENTS MARINE MAMMALS vii MARINE BIRDS 167 iii MARINE MAMMALS v MARINE MAMMALS Research Unit Proposer Title Page 34 G. Carleton Ray Analysis of Marine Mammal Remote 1 Douglas Wartzok Sensing Data Johns Hopkins U. 67 Clifford H. Fiscus Baseline Characterization of Marine 3 Howard W. Braham Mammals in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 68 Clifford H. Fiscus Abundance and Seasonal Distribution 30 Howard W. Braham of Marine Mammals in the Gulf of Roger W. Mercer Alaska NWFC/NMFS 69 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bowhead 33 Howard W. Braham and Belukha Whales in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 70 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bow- 36 Howard W. Braham et al head and Belukha Whales in the NWFC/NMFS Beaufort and Chukchi Seas 194 Francis H. Fay Morbidity and Mortality of Marine 43 IMS/U. of Alaska Mammals 229 Kenneth W. Pitcher Biology of the Harbor Seal, Phoca 48 Donald Calkins vitulina richardi, in the Gulf of ADF&G Alaska 230 John J. Burns The Natural History and Ecology of 55 Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release
    OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2020-001 BEAUFORT SEA: HYPOTHETICAL VERY LARGE OIL SPILL AND GAS RELEASE January 2020 Author: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska OCS Region REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (www.boem.gov/newsroom/library/alaska-scientific-and-technical-publications, and click on 2020). CITATION BOEM, 2020. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release. OCS Report BOEM 2020-001 Anchorage, AK: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Alaska OCS Region. 151 pp. Beaufort Sea: Hypothetical Very Large Oil Spill and Gas Release BOEM Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What is a VLOS? ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 What Could Precipitate a VLOS? ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 Historical OCS and Worldwide
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Characterization and Biological Utilization of Peard Bay
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION AND BIOLOGICAL UTILIZATION OF PEARD BAY Edited by Patrick J. Kinney Kinnetic Laboratories, Inc. 403 West Eighth Avenue P. O. BOX 104239 Anchorage, Alaska 99510 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 641 December 1985 97 PROJECT TEAM Project Management Donald E. Wilson, Ph.D. KLI Project Manager Samuel Stoker, Ph.D. KLI Assistant Project Manager Steve Pace, M.S. KL I Operations Manager Christine Brown, B.S. KL I Editorial Literature Review Jerome Cura, Ph.D. EG&G Task Leader Meteorology and Oceanoqraphy Donald E. Wilson, Ph.D. KLI Task Leader William Gahlen, M.S. EG&G Physical Synthesis Mark Savoie, M.S. KLI Physical Synthesis Walt Pharo, B.S. EG&G Field Studies Toby Goddard, B.S. KLI Field Studies Marine Mammals Samuel Stoker, Ph.D. KLI Task Leader/Field Studies Robert Gill, M.S. Biota Field Studies Colleen Handel, M.S. Bi ota Field Studies Peter Connors, Ph.D. Biota Field Studies Birds Robert Gill, M.S. Biota Task Leader Coleen Handel, M.S. Biota Field and Laboratory Studies Peter Connors. Ph.D. Biota Field Studies Fish John Hall, Ph.D. Sol ace Task Leader Scott Edson, M.S. Consultant Field Studies Marty Stevenson, M.A. KLI Synthesis 99 Invertebrates Steve Pace, M.S. KLI Task Leader Garry Gillingham, B.A. KLI Identifications Allen Fukuyama, M.A. MLML Identifications Kenneth Coyle, M.S. UAF Identifications Nutrients and Primary Productivity Osmund Helm-Hanson, Ph.D. S10 Task Leader Chris Hewes, M.S. S10 Field and Laboratory Studies Paul Mankiewitz, Ph.D. GG Carbon Isotopes Svnthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Population Survey of Common Eiders and Other Waterbirds in Near Shore Waters and Along Barrier Islands of the Arctic Coastal Plain of Alaska, 1-5 July 2009
    Aerial population survey of common eiders and other waterbirds in near shore waters and along barrier islands of the Arctic Coastal Plain of Alaska, 1-5 July 2009 By Christian P. Dau USFWS-Migratory Bird Management 1011 E. Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 and Karen S. Bollinger USFWS-Migratory Bird Management 1412 Airport Way Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 Key Words: Aerial population survey, Common Eider, waterbirds, barrier islands, Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska December 2009 2 SUMMARY This report presents results of the 11th consecutive aerial survey of common eiders and other waterbirds along the coastline of the Arctic Coastal Plain (ACP) of Alaska. The survey included barrier islands and was conducted from 1 to 5 July 2009 using an amphibious Cessna 206 (N234JB) with a pilot/observer and right seat observer. The survey area encompasses approximately 1,050 linear kilometers of the Chukchi and Beaufort seas coastlines from Omalik Lagoon north and east to the Canadian border. Additional areas of barrier island and peninsular habitats were included near Kasegaluk Lagoon (190 linear kilometers) and from Point Barrow to Demarcation Bay (325 linear kilometers). Open water predominated in near shore marine habitats and overall ice cover was the least extensive yet observed (since 1999) along both the Chukchi and Beaufort seas coasts. Remnant near shore sea ice was deteriorating rapidly and covered with melt water. A total of 1,931 common eiders, including 824 indicated breeding pairs (pairs + single adult males), were observed in 2009. Total observed and indicated breeding pairs were up 8.9 and down 14.2 percent, respectively, from 2008 and down 23.5 and 9.7 percent, respectively, from the long-term averages (1999-2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Accidental Oil Spills and Gas Releases;
    APPENDIX A Accidental Oil Spills and Gas Releases; Information, Models, and Estimates; and Supporting Figures, Tables, and Maps Posted at: https://www.boem.gov/Liberty/ This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Liberty Development and Production Plan Final EIS Table of Contents Contents A-1 Accidental Large Oil Spills ...................................................................................... 1 A-1.1 Large Spill Size, Source, and Oil-Type Assumptions ............................................................ 1 A-1.1.1 OCS Large Oil Spill Sizes .......................................................................................... 1 A-1.1.2 Onshore Large Oil Pipeline Spill Size ........................................................................ 1 A-1.1.3 Source and Type of Large Oil Spills .......................................................................... 2 A-1.1.4 Historical Loss of Well-Control Incidents on the OCS and North Sea ....................... 2 A-1.2 Behavior and Fate of Crude Oils ............................................................................................ 3 A-1.2.1 Generalized Processes Affecting the Fate and Behavior of Oil................................. 3 A-1.2.2 Assumptions about Oil Spill Weathering .................................................................... 4 A-1.2.3 Modeling Simulations of Oil Weathering .................................................................... 4 A-1.3 Estimates of Where a Large Offshore Oil Spill May Go ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • John Muir Writings the Cruise of the Corwin
    John Muir Writings The Cruise of the Corwin Journal of the Arctic Expedition of 1881 in search of De Long and the Jeannette By John Muir Edited by William Frederic Badè 1917 Contents Introduction I. Unalaska and the Aleuts II. Among the Islands of Bering Sea III. Siberian Adventures IV. In Peril from the Pack V. A Chukchi Orator VI. Eskimos and Walrus VII. At Plover Bay and St. Michael VIII. Return of the Search Party IX. Villages of the Dead X. Glimpses of Alaskan Tundra XI. Caribou and a Native Fair XII. Zigzags among the Polar Pack XIII. First Ascent of Herald Island XIV. Approaching a Mysterious Land XV. The Land of the White Bear XVI. Tragedies of the Whaling Fleet XVII. Meeting the Point Barrow Expedition XVIII. A Siberian Reindeer Herd XIX. Turned Back by Storms and Ice XX. Homeward Bound Appendix I. The Glaciation of the Arctic and Subarctic Regions Visited during the Cruise II. Botanical Notes Index Illustrations Cape Serdzekamen, Siberia Frontispiece From a photograph Map (not in the originally-published edition of this book) Iliuliuk, Unalaska From a photograph by E. S. Curtis Aleut Barábara at Iliuliuk, Unalaska From a photograph by E. S. Curtis Cliffs at St. Matthew Island From a photograph Chukchi Village at Plover Bay, Siberia From a photograph by E. S. Curtis West Diomede Village Siberian Village on a Sand-Spit From a photograph Chukchis and a Summer House at Plover Bay From a photograph by E. W. Nelson Chukchis At Indian Point, Siberia (Cape Chaplin) From a photograph by E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Wilderness in Theory and Practice a Dissertation
    Ocean Wilderness In Theory And Practice Item Type Thesis Authors Barr, Bradley W. Download date 11/10/2021 04:03:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9168 OCEAN WILDERNESS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Bradley W. Barr, M.S. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2012 UMI Number: 3537848 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3537848 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 OCEAN WILDERNESS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE By Bradley W. Barr RECOMMENDED: Dr. David Koester Dr. Andrew Kliskey, Advisory Committee Co-Chair Dr. Gordon Kruse, Advisory Committee Co-Chair Dr. Milo Adkison, Chair, Graduate Program in Fisheries Division APPROVED: Dr. I^ichael Castellini Dead, Sc Dr. John Eichelberger Dean of the Graduatp School / ^ ' / 2 Abstract Wilderness preservation has been an important focus of resource conservation since the dwindling number of wild places was perceived by some as losing a valued part of our collective natural and cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Alaska Tanker Lightering Best Practices Committee
    Best Practices for Western Alaska Lightering Operations 2021 Lightering Season Adopted March 17, 2021 Table of Contents Contributions from: ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Western Alaska Tanker Lightering Best Practices Committee ..................................................................... 5 Prologue ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Annual Update .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Involvement & Outreach ............................................................................................................................... 6 Western Alaska Lightering Background ....................................................................................................... 7 Common Terms Defined ............................................................................................................................... 7 Overview Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Why We Do This? ........................................................................................................................................ 7 General Information .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, US
    National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change Along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.-Canadian Border to Icy Cape Open-File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Oblique aerial photograph at Flaxman Island showing tapped and untapped thermokarst lakes, caribou tracks, narrow beaches, and bluff failures along the coast. Image taken August 9, 2006. National Assessment of Shoreline Change— Historical Shoreline Change along the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian Border to Icy Cape By Ann E. Gibbs and Bruce M. Richmond Open–File Report 2015–1048 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Gibbs, A.E., and Richmond, B.M., 2015, National assessment of shoreline change—Historical shoreline change along the north coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian border to Icy Cape: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Walrus Seasonal Occupancy and Haulouts U Point Collie Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake §[ Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !
    71° 162° 160° 158° 72° U LEGEND 12N 42W Ch u $ North Slope Planning Area ckchi Sea Conservation System Unit (Offset for display) Pingasagruk (abandoned) WAINWRIGHT Atanik (Abandoned) Naval Arctic Research Laboratory USGS 250k Quad Boundaries U Point Barrow I c U Point Belcher 24N Township Boundaries y 72° Akeonik (Ruins) Icy Cape U 17W C 12N Browerville a Trans-Alaska Pipeline p 39W 22N §[ Solivik Island e §[ Akvat !. P Ikpilgok 20W Barrow Secondary Roads (unpaved) a Asiniak!. Point s MEADE RIVER s !. !.!. Plover Point !. Wainwright Point Franklin Brant Point 1 !. Will Rogers and Wiley Post Memorial USGS Alaska Science Center, Pacific Walrus Seasonal Occupancy and Haulouts U Point Collie Tolageak (Abandoned) 9N Point Marsh Emaiksoun Lake §[ Kilmantavi (Abandoned) !. Kugrua BayEluksingiak Point Seahorse Islands June Walrus Occupancy 42W Kasegaluk Lagoon West Twin TekegakrokLake Point ak Pass Sigeakruk Point uitk A Mitliktavik (Abandoned) Peard Bay l U Ikroavik Lake E Tapkaluk Islands k Wainwright Inlet July Walrus Occupancy o P U l 12N k U i i e a n U re Avak Inlet Avak Point k 36W g C 16N 22N a o Karmuk Point Tutolivik n U Elson Lagoon t r !. u August Walrus Occupancy !. a a !. 14N m 29W 17W t r 17N u W Nivat Point o g P 32W Av k a a Nokotlek Point !. 26W Nulavik l A s P v a a s Nalimiut Point September Walrus Occupancy k a k MEADE RIVER p R s Pingorarok Hill BARROW U a Scott Point i s r Akunik Pass Kugachiak Creek v ve e i !.
    [Show full text]