DOCSLIB.ORG

Explanation of the Groundwater Database and Data Entry Heather Rein, Program Specialist Janie Hopkins, Groundwater Monitoring Manager

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explanation of the Groundwater Database and Data Entry Heather Rein, Program Specialist Janie Hopkins, Groundwater Monitoring Manager USER MANUAL 50 Explanation of the Groundwater Database and Data Entry Heather Rein, Program Specialist Janie Hopkins, Groundwater Monitoring Manager Revised 2008 TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Table of Contents ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose of the User’s Manual...................................................................................................................................3 History of the TWDB Groundwater Database..........................................................................................................4 Main Menu of the TWDB Groundwater Database ...................................................................................................6 Data Entry Forms......................................................................................................................................................7 Well-Numbering System (Site Identification) ..........................................................................................................9 Well Schedule.........................................................................................................................................................11 WELL RECORD DATA ENTRY...............................................................................................................................13 State Well Number..................................................................................................................................................13 Previous Well Number............................................................................................................................................13 County Code ...........................................................................................................................................................14 Basin .......................................................................................................................................................................15 Groundwater Management Area.............................................................................................................................17 Regional Water Planning Area ...............................................................................................................................19 Groundwater Conservation District ........................................................................................................................21 Aquifer Code ..........................................................................................................................................................24 Latitude/Longitude..................................................................................................................................................24 Coordinate Accuracy ..............................................................................................................................................25 Aquifer Identification .............................................................................................................................................26 Owner .....................................................................................................................................................................29 Driller......................................................................................................................................................................29 Well Depth..............................................................................................................................................................30 Source of Depth ......................................................................................................................................................30 Altitude ...................................................................................................................................................................30 Source of Altitude Data ..........................................................................................................................................31 Date Drilled ............................................................................................................................................................31 Well Type ...............................................................................................................................................................31 User Code ...............................................................................................................................................................32 Type of Lift.............................................................................................................................................................33 Type of Power.........................................................................................................................................................33 Horsepower.............................................................................................................................................................34 Primary/Secondary/Tertiary Use ............................................................................................................................34 Water Level ............................................................................................................................................................36 Water Quality..........................................................................................................................................................36 Well Logs................................................................................................................................................................36 Other Data...............................................................................................................................................................37 Construction............................................................................................................................................................38 Completion .............................................................................................................................................................39 Casing Material.......................................................................................................................................................39 Screen Material.......................................................................................................................................................40 Date Collected or Updated......................................................................................................................................41 Reporting Agency...................................................................................................................................................41 Well Schedule in File..............................................................................................................................................42 Date Updated ..........................................................................................................................................................42 User Identification ..................................................................................................................................................42 REMARKS DATA ENTRY........................................................................................................................................44 CASING RECORDS DATA ENTRY.........................................................................................................................46 i WATER LEVEL DATA ENTRY ...............................................................................................................................48 P/N—Visit Mark.....................................................................................................................................................49 Depth from Land Surface Datum............................................................................................................................49 Month, Day, Year—Date of Visit...........................................................................................................................50 Measurement Number.............................................................................................................................................50 Measuring Agency..................................................................................................................................................51 Method of Measurement.........................................................................................................................................51 Remark....................................................................................................................................................................52 Enter Date/User ID .................................................................................................................................................52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baylor Geological Studies
    BAYLORGEOLOGICA L STUDIES PAUL N. DOLLIVER Creative thinking is more important than elaborate FRANK PH.D. PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY BAYLOR UNIVERSITY 1929-1934 Objectives of Geological Training at Baylor The training of a geologist in a university covers but a few years; his education continues throughout his active life. The purposes of train­ ing geologists at Baylor University are to provide a sound basis of understanding and to foster a truly geological point of view, both of which are essential for continued professional growth. The staff considers geology to be unique among sciences since it is primarily a field science. All geologic research in­ cluding that done in laboratories must be firmly supported by field observations. The student is encouraged to develop an inquiring ob­ jective attitude and to examine critically all geological concepts and principles. The development of a mature and professional attitude toward geology and geological research is a principal concern of the department. Frontis. Sunset over the Canadian River from near the abandoned settlement of Old Tascosa, Texas. The rampart-like cliffs on the horizon first inspired the name "Llano Estacado" (Palisaded Plain) among Coronado's men. THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PRESS WACO, TEXAS BAYLOR GEOLOGICAL STUDIES BULLETIN NO. 42 Cenozoic Evolution of the Canadian River Basin Paul N. DoUiver BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Department of Geology Waco, Texas Spring 1984 Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer Jenness, M.S., Editor environmental and medical geology O. T. Ph.D., Advisor, Cartographic Editor what have you Peter M. Allen, Ph.D. urban and environmental geology, hydrology Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsolved Geological Problems in Oklahoma in 1925
    136 THE UNIVERSlTY OF OKLAHOMA XXXII. UNSOLVED GEOLQGICAL PROBLEMS IN OKLAHOMA IN 1925 By eha•. N. Gould, Oklahoma Geological Survey Thirty years ago Mr. Joseph A. T~f of the. Unit.ed Statc~ Geological Survey began work'on the coal fields of Indian 'Uddea. 1. A.. The'lUaa Rock of tile HiP PIaiu. BaD. A.-oc. Pet. (ieoI.. .~oI. VII. J'23, p. 12·74. THE OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE 137 Territory., Twenty-~ive yea~s,ago the writer founded the D.epart­ ment of Geology at the University of Oklahoma. For more thaa half the in'tervening time there were relatively few working geolo­ gists in Oklahoma but during the last decade the numb'er has in­ creased. The exact number o~ 'geologists living in Oklahoma is un­ known' but. there are somewhere around 300 names registerett irom this state on t,he rolls of American Association of Petroleum Geologists, and this of course does not represent the entire' nunt- I,er of geologists in the state. ', It might appear to the casual observer that300 men, :fome O'! who~ have been wor'king for at least a decade, should hav" ~olved practically all the ge'ological probiems in the state: As early as 1905, when E. G. Woodruff and I were the 'onl)' working geologists in Oklahoma, in order to attempt to outlin!: the magnftude o~ the <£ubject I prepared a list of the probleQ\ll to be solved in 'Oklahoma geology. So far as I know this list was never pu'blished and I am not now able to find it.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Pass the Salt: Using Oil Fields for the Disposal of Concentrate from Desalination Plants
    FINAL REPORT - June 2005 Please Pass the Salt: Using Oil Fields for the Disposal of Concentrate from Desalination Plants PRESSURE 8 0 % % 0 8 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 6 J l 0 C % % a 0 C 0 J + 6 + J J M 4 JJ J O 4 JJ J JJ J J J g 0 J JJ J J J J S JJ JJ J % % J J J J JJ J 1,000 J JJJJJJ J JJJ J J 0 JJJ J JJJJJ JJJJ J J J J 4 JJJ JJJJJ JJ JJ J J J JJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJ JJ 2 JJJJ JJJ JJ J J 0 J JJJJJ JJ JJJJ J J JJ J JJJJJJJJ J J % % J J JJJJJJJJJJ J JJ 2,000 JJ JJJ JJJJJ J J JJJ J 0 J JJJ JJJJJJJJJ JJJ J J JJ 2 JJ JJJJ J J J J JJJ JJ J J JJ J J J JJJJJ J JJ J J J JJ JJJJJJJJ J JJ J J JJJ J J JJJ J J 3,000 JJ JJ JJ J J J J JJ JJ J JJ J J JJ J J J J J J JJ J J J J J J J J JJ J JJJJ J J J JJ J JJ JJ JJJ JJJ J J JJJ J J J J JJ J JJ J J J J 4,000 J J J JJ JJJJJ J J J J JJJJ J J J J J JJ JJJJJ J J JJJJ DEPTH J J J J JJ JJJJ 5,000 J JJJ JJ JJ 2 JJJJ 0 % J JJ % 0 J JJJJ 2 J J J J 80% N JJJ 80% a JJ JJJ 3 6,000 JJJ J + J J O 4 JJ C 0 % K JJJ % J 0 J JJ H S g 4 JJ J O 60% JJ JJ J 60% M 4 7,000 6 JJ 0 J JJ J J J % % J JJ J J J J J 0 J JJ JJJ J J J J 6 JJJJ J 40% J J J J J J J J J J JJ 40% J J J JJ J JJ JJ J JJ 8,000 J J J J J 8 J J J J J JJJJJJ J J J J J J J 0 J J J J JJ JJ J J J J % J JJ J J J J JJ J JJ JJ J % J J JJJ JJJJ JJJJ J JJ J J J JJJJ JJJ J J 0 J JJJJJJ JJJJJJ J J JJJ J J JJ JJJ JJJJJJJ J JJ J 8 J JJ JJJJ JJJJJJ J JJ JJJ J JJ 20% J J JJJ JJJJJJJJJJ JJ JJJJJJ J J J J J JJJ JJJJJJ JJJJJJJ JJJ J JJJJ J 20% J JJ JJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJ J JJJ JJJ JJJJ J JJ JJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJ J J J JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJ
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Report
    Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Report ## by Legend Paul R. Knox, P.G. State Line Shelf Edge Yegua-Jackson outcrop Van A. Kelley, P.G. County Boundaries Well Locations Astrid Vreugdenhil Sediment Input Axis (Size Relative to Sed. Vol.) Facies Neil Deeds, P.E. Deltaic/Delta Front/Strandplain Wave-Dominated Delta Steven Seni, Ph.D., P.G. Delta Margin < 100' Fluvial Floodplain Slope 020406010 Miles Shelf-Edge Delta Shelf/Slope Sand > 100' Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 7871-3231 September 2007 TWDB Report ##: Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Texas Water Development Board Report ## Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain by Van A. Kelley, P.G. Astrid Vreugdenhil Neil Deeds, P.E. INTERA Incorporated Paul R. Knox, P.G. Baer Engineering and Environmental Consulting, Incorporated Steven Seni, Ph.D., P.G. Consulting Geologist September 2007 This page is intentionally blank. ii This page is intentionally blank. iv TWDB Report ##: Structure of the Yegua-Jackson Aquifer of the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain Table of Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................E-i 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Study Area and Geologic Setting.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Geology of Cenozoic Deposits, Gulf Coastal Plain, South-Central United States
    REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHY AND _^ SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF CENOZOIC DEPOSITS, GULF COASTAL PLAIN, SOUTH-CENTRAL UNITED STATES V U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1416-G AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • South Texas Project Units 3 & 4 COLA
    Rev. 08 STP 3 & 4 Final Safety Analysis Report 2.5S.1 Basic Geologic and Seismic Information The geological and seismological information presented in this section was developed from a review of previous reports prepared for the existing units, published geologic literature, interpretation of aerial photography, a subsurface investigation, and an aerial reconnaissance conducted for preparation of this STP 3 & 4 application. Previous site-specific reports reviewed include the STP 1 & 2 FSAR, Revision 13 (Reference 2.5S.1-7). A review of published geologic literature and seismologic data supplements and updates the existing geological and seismological information. A list of references used to compile the geological and seismological information presented in the following pages is provided at the end of Subsection 2.5S.1. It is intended in this section of the STP 3 & 4 FSAR to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 100.23 (c). Presented in this section is information of the geological and seismological characteristics of the STP 3 & 4 site region, site vicinity, site area, and site. Subsection 2.5S.1.1 describes the geologic and tectonic characteristics of the site region and site vicinity. Subsection 2.5S.1.2 describes the geologic and tectonic characteristics of the STP 3 & 4 site area and site. The geological and seismological information was developed in accordance with NRC guidance documents RG-1.206 and RG-1.208. 2.5S.1.1 Regional Geology (200 mile radius) Using Texas Bureau of Economic Geology Terminology, this subsection discusses the physiography, geologic history, stratigraphy, and tectonic setting within a 200 mi radius of the STP 3 & 4 site.
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsum Karst Speleogenesis in Barber County, Kansas of the Permian Blaine Formation Kaitlyn Gauvey Fort Hays State University, [email protected]
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Spring 2019 Gypsum Karst Speleogenesis in Barber County, Kansas of the Permian Blaine Formation Kaitlyn Gauvey Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons, and the Speleology Commons Recommended Citation Gauvey, Kaitlyn, "Gypsum Karst Speleogenesis in Barber County, Kansas of the Permian Blaine Formation" (2019). Master's Theses. 3133. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/3133 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. GYPSUM KARST SPELEOGENESIS IN BARBER COUNTY, KANSAS OF THE PERMIAN BLAINE FORMATION being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of Fort Hays State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Kaitlyn L. Gauvey B.S., Sam Houston State University Date- --=5-'/--2=-'6=-/=2-=0-.,.1.=9---- - - - This thesis for the Master of Science Degree By Kaitlyn L. Gauvey has been approved Dr. Keith Bremer, Committee Member Dr. Richard Lisichenko, Committee Member ABSTRACT Field reconnaissance examining the Permian Blaine Formation and the karst features within those rocks were conducted on two ranches in Barber County, Kansas. Karst features are developed dominantly in gypsum and include caves, sinkholes, losing streams, springs, and other surficial karst features. The Blaine Formation is known as a significant karst unit and major aquifer system in Oklahoma; however, little work has been conducted in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature and Geologic Sections of the Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas
    STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE AND GEOLOGIC SECTIONS OF THE GULF COASTAL PLAIN OF TEXAS By E.T. Baker, Jr. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 94-461 A contribution of the Regional Aquifer-System Analysis Program Austin, Texas 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Chief Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Mail Stop 517 8011 Cameron Rd. Denver Federal Center Austin, TX 78754-3898 Denver, CO 80225-0046 CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................,........,............................^ 1 Stratigraphic Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Sections ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Selected References ........................................................................................................................^^
    [Show full text]
  • Depositional Systems in the Sparta Formation (Eocene)
    DEPOSITIONALSYSTEMS IN THE SPARTA FORMATION (EOCENE) GULF COAST BASIN OF TEXAS1 Jose Ulises Ricoy2 and L.F. Brown,Jr.3 Abstract Three principal depositional systems are defined within the Sparta Formation ofTexas using surface and subsurface data: high-constructive delta system in east Texas, strandplain/barrier-bar system in central Texas, and high-destructive, wave-dominateddelta system in south Texas. Principal facies constituents of the high-constructive delta include upper delta plain in outcrop and lower delta plain, delta front,andprodelta in subsurface. Five major deltaic lobes in the SpartaFormation are similar to variouslobes ofthe Eocene QueenCity Formation, lower Wilcox Group, Jackson Group, and Yegua Formation ofTexas. The Sparta high- constructive delta system is present from Fayette andColorado counties in Texas, eastward into Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas. The Sparta strandplain/barrier-bar system ofcentralTexasis basically composedofa single multistorybarrier bar unit.It was constructed with sand transported along strike by longshore currents from reworked sediments of the high- constructive delta system in east Texas. This system extends from Fayette andColorado counties westward to Atascosa and LiveOak counties. A Holocene analog is the Texasbarrier island system. Eocene analogs arethe strandplain/barrier- bar system of the Eocene Jackson Group, Yegua Formation, lower Wilcox Group, andQueen City Formation. A high-destructive delta system in south Texas is composedessentially ofcoastal barriers and associated lagoonal facies in outcrop and coastal barrier, lagoon, andprodelta shelf facies in the subsurface. This wave-dominated delta system is present from Atascosa andLiveOak counties southward to the Rio Grande, andit extends into northern Mexico. Eocene analogs occur in the south Texas Wilcox Group,Yegua Formation, andQueenCity Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology of Igneous Rocks in the Sierra Norte De Córdoba (Argentina): Implications for the Pampean Evolution at the Western Gondwana Margin
    RESEARCH Geochronology of igneous rocks in the Sierra Norte de Córdoba (Argentina): Implications for the Pampean evolution at the western Gondwana margin W. von Gosen1,*, W.C. McClelland2,*, W. Loske3,*, J.C. Martínez4,5,*, and C. Prozzi4,* 1GEOZENTRUM NORDBAYERN, KRUSTENDYNAMIK, FRIEDRICH-ALEXANDER-UNIVERSITÄT ERLANGEN-NÜRNBERG, SCHLOSSGARTEN 5, D-91054 ERLANGEN, GERMANY 2DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, 121 TROWBRIDGE HALL, IOWA CITY, IOWA 52242, USA 3DEPARTMENT FÜR GEO- UND UMWELTWISSENSCHAFTEN, SEKTION GEOLOGIE, LUDWIG-MAXIMILIANS-UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN, LUISENSTRASSE 37, D-80333 MÜNCHEN, GERMANY 4DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOLOGÍA, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR, SAN JUAN 670, 8000 BAHÍA BLANCA, ARGENTINA 5INGEOSUR-CONICET ABSTRACT U-Pb zircon data (secondary ion mass spectrometry [SIMS] and thermal ionization mass spectrometry [TIMS] analyses) from igneous rocks with differing structural fabrics in the Sierra Norte de Córdoba, western Argentina, suggest that the sedimentary, tectonic, and magmatic history in this part of the Eastern Sierras Pampeanas spans the late Neoproterozoic–Early Cambrian. A deformed metarhyolite layer in meta- clastic sedimentary rocks gives a crystallization age of 535 ± 5 Ma, providing a limit on the timing of the onset of D1 deformation and meta- morphism. The new data coupled with published Neoproterozoic zircon dates from a rhyolite beneath the metaclastic section and detrital zircon ages from the section indicate a late Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian depositional age, making this section time equivalent with the Puncoviscana Formation (sensu lato) of northwest Argentina. A synkinematic granite porphyry gives a crystallization age of 534 ± 5 Ma, pro- viding a limit on the age of dextral mylonitization in the Sierra Norte area (D2 event).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitæ
    THOMAS A. SHILLER II, Ph.D. Box C-64 Alpine, TX 79830 (432) 837-8871 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Texas Tech University, Lubbock Geoscience, May 2017 Dissertation: “Stratigraphy and paleontology of Upper Cretaceous strata in northern Coahuila, Mexico” Scholarships and Awards: John P. Brand Memorial Scholarship M.S. Texas Tech University, Lubbock Geoscience, 2012 Thesis: “A dyrosaurid crocodilian from the Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Escondido Formation of Coahuila, Mexico” B. S. Sul Ross State University, Alpine Geology, 2009 Minor: Biology Scholarships and Awards: David M. Rohr Scholarship, Julius Dasch Outstanding Undergraduate Geology Student, Texas Space Grant Consortium Scholarship TEACHING EXPERIENCE Sul Ross State University; Department of Biology, Geology, and Physical Sciences Assistant Professor Physical Geology—2017–present Historical Geology—2018–present Stratigraphy and Sedimentation—2018–present Dinosaurs, Volcanoes, and Earthquakes—2017–present Vertebrate Paleontology—2018–present Intro to Field Geology—2018–present Field Methods—2018–present Advanced Structural Methods—2019 Dynamic Stratigraphy—2019 Structural Geology—2020 Texas Tech University, Department of Geosciences Teaching Assistant Advanced Field Methods—Summer, 2010–2015 Sedimentary Field Methods—Spring; 2011–2014, 2017 Stratigraphy and Sedimentology—Fall, 2016 Lab Instructor Historical Geology—Fall, 2011–2015; Summer, 2016 Sul Ross State University, Department of Earth and Physical Sciences Texas Pre-freshman Engineering Program (TexPREP)—2009 RESEARCH Sul Ross State University, Department of Biology, Geology, and Physical Sciences Big Bend National Park, Texas—present Collect and document Cretaceous–Paleogene vertebrate fossil material under permit from the National Park Service. Northern Coahuila, Mexico—present Conducting an ongoing study of the paleontology and stratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous strata of the region of Mexico adjacent to Big Bend National Park and the Región Carbonífera of Coahuila.
    [Show full text]