DOCSLIB.ORG

Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Genus Aphelocerus Kirsch (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classification, Natural History, and Evolution of the Genus Aphelocerus Kirsch (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) CLASSIFICATION, NATURAL HISTORY, AND EVOLUTION OF THE GENUS APHELOCERUS KIRSCH (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE: CLERINAE) WESTON OPITZ Kansas Wesleyan University, Department of Biology, 100 East Cla¯in Avenue, Salina KS 67401-6196 ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 293, 128 pp., 287 ®gures, 1 table, 27 maps Issued May 11, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 2 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 293 Habitus of Aphelocerus coactus, new species. CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumen ....................................................................... 7 Introduction .................................................................... 8 Literature Review ............................................................. 8 Materials and Methods ........................................................ 8 Assessment of Species-Level Discontinuities .................................... 10 Phylogenetic Methods ........................................................ 11 Repositories of Specimens .................................................... 11 Natural History ................................................................ 13 Mimetic Associations ........................................................ 13 Floral Associations .......................................................... 15 Field Observations ........................................................... 16 Natural History Information from Specimen Labels .............................. 17 Diagnosis of Aphelocerus ....................................................... 17 Description of Aphelocerus ..................................................... 18 Species Groups of Aphelocerus .................................................. 20 Troublesome Couplets in Key to Species ......................................... 23 Key to Species Groups and Species .............................................. 23 Description of Aphelocerus Species .............................................. 30 coalitus group Aphelocerus leucomelas (Chevrolat) ......................................... 30 Aphelocerus coalitus, new species ........................................... 32 echinatus group Aphelocerus echinatus, new species .......................................... 34 Aphelocerus affaniatis, new species .......................................... 34 ciliaris group Aphelocerus ciliaris, new species ............................................ 35 Aphelocerus citimus, new species ............................................ 37 bispineus group Aphelocerus delicatulus (Barr) .............................................. 39 Aphelocerus aeneus, new species ............................................ 39 Aphelocerus bispineus, new species .......................................... 41 Aphelocerus acuticolis, new species ......................................... 41 acanthus group Aphelocerus primigenius, new species ........................................ 42 Aphelocerus sturnus Kirsh .................................................. 42 Aphelocerus acanthus, new species .......................................... 43 Aphelocerus inconstans (Gorham) ........................................... 45 Aphelocerus cirritus, new species ........................................... 47 Aphelocerus patulus, new species ........................................... 47 Aphelocerus chiriqui, new species ........................................... 48 sculptilus group Aphelocerus sculptillus, new species ......................................... 50 Aphelocerus sabulosus, new species ......................................... 51 Aphelocerus chondrus, new species .......................................... 51 Aphelocerus cohibilis, new species .......................................... 53 irroratus group Aphelocerus irroratus, new species .......................................... 53 immarginatus group Aphelocerus immarginatus (Chevrolat) ....................................... 55 yungas group 3 4 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 293 Aphelocerus acutus, new species ............................................ 56 Aphelocerus torosus, new species ........................................... 56 Aphelocerus olanchoensis new species ....................................... 58 Aphelocerus vietus, new species ............................................. 58 Aphelocerus turnbowi, new species .......................................... 59 Aphelocerus cornuatus, new species ......................................... 61 Aphelocerus humerus, new species .......................................... 61 Aphelocerus domus, new species ............................................ 62 Aphelocerus capillus, new species ........................................... 62 Aphelocerus coactus, new species ........................................... 64 Aphelocerus scalenus, new species .......................................... 67 Aphelocerus yungas, new species ............................................ 67 Aphelocerus extensivus, new species ......................................... 68 batesi group Aphelocerus lividus, new species ............................................ 69 Aphelocerus nitidus (Chevrolat) ............................................. 70 Aphelocerus sagittarius, new species ......................................... 72 Aphelocerus triangulus, new species ......................................... 73 Aphelocerus batesi, new species ............................................. 73 Aphelocerus ebenus, new species ............................................ 75 Aphelocerus catie, new species .............................................. 75 Aphelocerus monteverde, new species ........................................ 76 Aphelocerus arenatus, new species .......................................... 78 Aphelocerus bufustis, new species ........................................... 78 Aphelocerus anticus, new species ............................................ 81 Aphelocerus naevius, new species ........................................... 81 Aphelocerus protenus, new species .......................................... 82 Aphelocerus argus, new species ............................................. 84 panus group Aphelocerus panus, new species ............................................. 84 Aphelocerus hespenheidei, new species ....................................... 85 Aphelocerus collaris, new species ........................................... 85 formicoides group Aphelocerus dispilis, new species ............................................ 87 Aphelocerus formicoides, new species ........................................ 87 cheliferous group Aphelocerus akis, new species .............................................. 88 Aphelocerus chelonus, new species .......................................... 89 Aphelocerus cheliferous, new species ........................................ 89 scutellaris group Aphelocerus scutellaris (Chevrolat) .......................................... 90 Aphelocerus improcerus, new species ........................................ 91 Aphelocerus propinquus, new species ........................................ 93 Aphelocerus calvus, new species ............................................ 93 myrmecoides group Aphelocerus myrmecoides, new species ...................................... 95 Aphelocerus inbatus, new species ........................................... 98 Aphelocerus eriodes, new species ........................................... 98 Aphelocerus discapillus, new species ....................................... 100 Evolutionary Considerations ................................................. 100 Character Selected for Phylogenetic Analysis ................................ 101 Phylogenetic Analysis ..................................................... 103 Phylogenetic Scenario for the Evolution of Aphelocerus and its Species Groups . 103 2005 OPITZ: APHELOCERUS 5 Zoogeographic Considerations ............................................. 104 Geophysical Orismology .................................................. 105 Grupos de Especies de Aphelocerus ........................................... 108 Pasos Problamaticos en la Clave de Especies .................................. 110 Clave de los Grupos de Especie y de las Especies .............................. 111 Acknowledgments ............................................................ 117 References ................................................................... 117 Maps ........................................................................ 120 ABSTRACT The genus Aphelocerus is rede®ned to include 66 species as follows: A. leucomelas (Chev- rolat); A. coalitus, n.sp.; A. echinatus, n.sp.; A. affaniatis, n.sp.; A. delicatulus (Barr); A. aeneus, n.sp.; A. bispineus, n.sp.; A. extensivus, n.sp.; A. primigenious, n.sp.; A. ciliaris, n.sp.; A. acuticolis, n.sp.; A. citimus, n.sp.; A. sturnus Kirsh; A. acanthus, n.sp.; A. inconstans (Gor- ham); A. cirritus, n.sp.; A. patulus, n.sp.; A. chiriqui, n.sp.; A. sculptilus, n.sp.; A. sabulosus, n.sp.; A. chondrus, n.sp.; A. cohibilis, n.sp.; A. irroratus, n.sp.; A. immarginatus (Chevrolat); A. acutus, n.sp.; A. torosus, n.sp.; A. olanchoensis, n.sp.; A. vietus, n.sp.; A. turnbowi, n.sp.; A. cornuatus, n.sp.; A. humerus, n.sp.; A. domus, n.sp.; A. capillus, n.sp.; A. coactus, n.sp.; A. scalenus, n.sp.; A. yungas, n.sp.;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pohoria Burda Na Dostupných Historických Mapách Je Aj Cieľom Tohto Príspevku
    OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica Redakčná rada: prof. Dr. Ing. Viliam Pichler doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Mgr. Michal Adamec RNDr. Ján Kadlečík Ing. Marta Mútňanová RNDr. Katarína Králiková Recenzenti čísla: RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Jerguš Tesák doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Zostavil: RNDr. Katarína Králiková Jayzková korektúra: Mgr. Olga Majerová Grafická úprava: Ing. Viktória Ihringová Vydala: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica v roku 2016 Vydávané v elektronickej verzii Adresa redakcie: ŠOP SR, Tajovského 28B, 974 01 Banská Bystrica tel.: 048/413 66 61, e-mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2453-8183 Uzávierka predkladania príspevkov do nasledujúceho čísla (28): 30.9.2016. 2 \ Ochrana prírody, 27/2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY INŠTRUKCIE PRE AUTOROV Vedecký časopis je zameraný najmä na publikovanie pôvodných vedeckých a odborných prác, recenzií a krátkych správ z ochrany prírody a krajiny, resp. z ochranárskej biológie, prioritne na Slovensku. Príspevky sú publikované v slovenskom, príp. českom jazyku s anglickým súhrnom, príp. v anglickom jazyku so slovenským (českým) súhrnom. Členenie príspevku 1) názov príspevku 2) neskrátené meno autora, adresa autora (vrátane adresy elektronickej pošty) 3) názov príspevku, abstrakt a kľúčové slová v anglickom jazyku 4) úvod, metodika, výsledky, diskusia, záver, literatúra Ilustrácie (obrázky, tabuľky, náčrty, mapky, mapy, grafy, fotografie) • minimálne rozlíšenie 1200 x 800 pixelov, rozlíšenie 300 dpi (digitálna fotografia má väčšinou 72 dpi) • každá ilustrácia bude uložená v samostatnom súbore (jpg, tif, bmp…) • používajte kilometrovú mierku, nie číselnú • mapy vytvorené v ArcView je nutné vyexportovať do formátov tif, jpg,..
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin: a Companion
    CHARLES DARWIN: A COMPANION Charles Darwin aged 59. Reproduction of a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron, original 13 x 10 inches, taken at Dumbola Lodge, Freshwater, Isle of Wight in July 1869. The original print is signed and authenticated by Mrs Cameron and also signed by Darwin. It bears Colnaghi's blind embossed registration. [page 3] CHARLES DARWIN A Companion by R. B. FREEMAN Department of Zoology University College London DAWSON [page 4] First published in 1978 © R. B. Freeman 1978 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher: Wm Dawson & Sons Ltd, Cannon House Folkestone, Kent, England Archon Books, The Shoe String Press, Inc 995 Sherman Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06514 USA British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Freeman, Richard Broke. Charles Darwin. 1. Darwin, Charles – Dictionaries, indexes, etc. 575′. 0092′4 QH31. D2 ISBN 0–7129–0901–X Archon ISBN 0–208–01739–9 LC 78–40928 Filmset in 11/12 pt Bembo Printed and bound in Great Britain by W & J Mackay Limited, Chatham [page 5] CONTENTS List of Illustrations 6 Introduction 7 Acknowledgements 10 Abbreviations 11 Text 17–309 [page 6] LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Charles Darwin aged 59 Frontispiece From a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron Skeleton Pedigree of Charles Robert Darwin 66 Pedigree to show Charles Robert Darwin's Relationship to his Wife Emma 67 Wedgwood Pedigree of Robert Darwin's Children and Grandchildren 68 Arms and Crest of Robert Waring Darwin 69 Research Notes on Insectivorous Plants 1860 90 Charles Darwin's Full Signature 91 [page 7] INTRODUCTION THIS Companion is about Charles Darwin the man: it is not about evolution by natural selection, nor is it about any other of his theoretical or experimental work.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat: a Novel
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Faculty Publications 2019 Meat: A Novel Sergey Belyaev Boris Pilnyak Ronald D. LeBlanc University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Belyaev, Sergey; Pilnyak, Boris; and LeBlanc, Ronald D., "Meat: A Novel" (2019). Faculty Publications. 650. https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs/650 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sergey Belyaev and Boris Pilnyak Meat: A Novel Translated by Ronald D. LeBlanc Table of Contents Acknowledgments . III Note on Translation & Transliteration . IV Meat: A Novel: Text and Context . V Meat: A Novel: Part I . 1 Meat: A Novel: Part II . 56 Meat: A Novel: Part III . 98 Memorandum from the Authors . 157 II Acknowledgments I wish to thank the several friends and colleagues who provided me with assistance, advice, and support during the course of my work on this translation project, especially those who helped me to identify some of the exotic culinary items that are mentioned in the opening section of Part I. They include Lynn Visson, Darra Goldstein, Joyce Toomre, and Viktor Konstantinovich Lanchikov. Valuable translation help with tricky grammatical constructions and idiomatic expressions was provided by Dwight and Liya Roesch, both while they were in Moscow serving as interpreters for the State Department and since their return stateside.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera from the Middle-Upper Eocene European Ambers: Generic Composition, Zoogeography and Climatic Implications
    Zootaxa 4290 (3): 401–443 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4290.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF4550B2-72EC-45C7-A156-542D76E28EB4 Coleoptera from the middle-upper Eocene European ambers: generic composition, zoogeography and climatic implications VITALII I. ALEKSEEV Department of Zootechny, Kaliningrad State Technical University, Sovetsky Avenue 1. 236000, Kaliningrad, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The paper contains a review of coleopteran genera known from Baltic, Bitterfeld and Rovno amber localities. Altogether 420 genera (191 extinct and 229 extant) from 78 families are listed from these three Lagerstätten (as of 7 March 2017). The listed beetles were analyzed zoogeographically and distributional maps for 72 genera were compiled. One-quarter (56) of the genera that have survived since the Eocene have cosmopolitan ranges at present; 35 extant genera have been extripated from the Palaearctic since the Eocene. Approximately 40% of beetle genera from the middle-upper Eocene Eu- ropean ambers can be encountered in the wild in present-day Europe, while 5 of these genera are supposed to be European relict endemics originating in Fennosarmatia. The general similarity of the Baltic amber (s.l.) beetle assemblage to modern south Palaearctic fauna is the strongest, the Nearctic elements are more numerous in the middle-upper Eocene European ambers than the Oriental taxa. The simplified Mutual Climatic Range (MCR) method was used for palaeoclimate recon- struction based on fossil beetles. The coleopteran assemblage of Baltic amber is interpreted as indicative of warm temper- ate, humid, equable climate with reduced thermal seasonality [annual average temperatures range from +10–20˚C; mean of the coldest month temperatures around +10˚C; mean of the hottest month temperature around +20–24˚C; annual pre- cipitation around 750–1500 mm].
    [Show full text]
  • Novitates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    AMERICAN MUSEUM Novitates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 2998, 7 pp., 2 illustrations March 6, 1991 Morocconites Struve, 1989, A Devonian Acastine Trilobite (Calmoniidae: Acastinae) GREGORY D. EDGECOMBE1 ABSTRACT A well-preserved dorsal exoskeleton of Moroc- toides Delo, 1935, with unique modifications of conites malladoides Struve, 1989, from the De- the cephalic border and pygidium. Morocconi- vonian ofMorocco, allows a complete description tinae Struve, 1989, is a subjective synonym ofthe ofthe type species ofthis monotypic genus. Moroc- calmoniid subfamily Acastinae Delo, 1935. conites is most closely related to the acastine Acas- INTRODUCTION Morocconites malladoides Struve, 1989, me to examine a superbly preserved acastine was based on a mostly exfoliated dorsal exo- from Devonian strata at Alnif in the Mo- skeleton from Devonian strata in the Alnif roccan North Sahara. It was determined that area, west of Erfoud, Maider, Morocco. The the outstretched dorsal exoskeleton described species was interpreted as "possibly rooting in this paper is conspecific with the holotype in dalmanitinine dalmanitaceans" and with ofMorocconites malladoides Struve. The new "zeliszkelline/dalmanitinine descent ... ob- specimen provides strong evidence for clos- vious" (Struve, 1989: 567). An independent est relations to taxa classified in the calmoni- genus and subfamily (Morocconitinae Struve, id subfamily Acastinae (notably Acastoides 1989) were established with the hypothesis Delo, 1935). Accordingly, the subfamily Mo- that a "mixture of distinctly divergent char- rocconitinae is removed from the Dalmani- acters of different, clearly separated phyletic tidae, and is regarded as a synonym ofAcas- branches ... seems to root deep in the early tinae (Calmoniidae).
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) De La Región Neotropical
    Biota Colombiana 4 (2) 123 - 145, 2003 Lista de los géneros y especies de la familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de la región Neotropical Diana C. Arias1 y Gerard Delvare2 1 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt”, AA 8693, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. [email protected], [email protected] 2 Departamento de Faunística y Taxonomía del CIRAD, Montpellier, Francia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Chalcididae, Parasitoide, Avispas Patonas, Neotrópico El orden Hymenoptera se ha dividido tradicional- La superfamilia Chalcidoidea se caracteriza por presentar mente en dos subórdenes “Symphyta” y Apocrita, este úl- en el ala anterior una venación reducida, tan solo están timo a su vez dividido en dos grupos con categoría de sec- presentes la vena submarginal, la vena marginal, la vena ción o infraorden dependiendo de los autores, denomina- estigmal y la vena postmarginal. Adicionalmente el pronoto dos “Parasitica” o también conocidos como Terebrantes y no se extiende hasta la tégula debido a que el prepecto Aculeata (Gauld & Bolton 1988). Gauld & Hanson (1995) (esclerito, en forma de sillín o herradura) se extiende hasta abandonan esta clasificación reconociendo únicamente la tégula y separa el mesopleurón del pronoto. Otra caracte- superfamilias dentro del orden. Sin embargo muchos auto- rística de este superfamilia es la presencia de un espiráculo res siguen utilizando la división tradicional porque consi- mesotorácico visible, además algunos especimenes presen- deran que es un medio práctico para separar grandes gru- tan estructuras sensoriales en uno o más de los pos de Hymenoptera en el aspecto biológico. flagelómeros. Finalmente algunas familias exhiben coloraciones metálicas (Gibson 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the Checkered Beetle Fauna of Belize with the Description of a New Species (Coleoptera: Cleridae) and a Nomenclatural Change
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 1995 Additions to the checkered beetle fauna of Belize with the description of a new species (Coleoptera: Cleridae) and a nomenclatural change Jacques Rifkind North Hollywood, CA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Rifkind, Jacques, "Additions to the checkered beetle fauna of Belize with the description of a new species (Coleoptera: Cleridae) and a nomenclatural change" (1995). Insecta Mundi. 161. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/161 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, March - June, 1995 17 Additions to the checkered beetle fauna of Belize with the description of a new species (Coleoptera: Cleridae) and a nomenclatural change Jacques Rifkind 11322 Camarillo St. #304 North Hollywood, CA 91602 USA Abstract: New information on the distribution and ecology of Cleridae in Belize, Central America is presented. Enoclerus (E.) gumae, new species, is described from Cayo District, Belize and Cymatodera pallidipennis Chevrolat 1843 is placed as a junior synonym of C. prolixa (Klug 1842). Introduction Until the early
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Review of Euphydryas Maturna
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 58 (2), pp. 145–161, 2012 TAXONOMIC REVIEW OF EUPHYDRYAS MATURNA (LINNAEUS, 1758) (LEPIDOPTERA, NYMPHALIDAE) WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SUBSPECIES FROM DOBROGEA (ROMANIA) AND NOTES ON CONSERVATION BIOLOGY RÁKOSY, L.1, PECSENYE, K.2, MIHALI, C.1, TÓTH, A.2 and VARGA, Z.2 1Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Babes-Bolyai University RO-3400, Str. Clinicilor 5–7, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen H-4010 Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1. Hungary, E-mail: [email protected] Taxonomy, geographical range and subspecific subdivision of Euphydryas maturna are con- sidered. The isolated population from Dobrogea is described as E. maturna opulenta ssp. n. based on external and genital characters. The separation is also supported by the significant genetic differentiation based on 17 allozyme loci. The Dobrogea population was shown to be highly differentiated from the nearby populations in the Carpathian basin. This population may therefore be an relict population and possibly also an evolutionarily significant unit. Its conservation is of high concern as are many other butterfly species inhabiting sparse decidu- ous forests. With 2 tables and 18 figures. Key words: Melitaeini taxonomy, biogeography, Euphydryas maturna subspecies, genital char- acters, conservation biology INTRODUCTION Phylogenetic subdivision of Euphydryas Species of the genus Euphydryas SCUDDER, 1872 (sensu lato) (Nymphali- dae, Melitaeini) have a Holarctic distribution. Eight species occur in the Palae- arctic region and six in the Nearctic region (HIGGINS 1978). They form a mono- phyletic group within the Melitaeini clade as opposed to the Chlosyne–Phycio- des–Melitaea monophylum (ZIMMERMANN et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Silurian Trilobite Palaeobiology And
    LATE SILURIAN TRILOBITE PALAEOBIOLOGY AND BIODIVERSITY by ANDREW JAMES STOREY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham February 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Trilobites from the Ludlow and Přídolí of England and Wales are described. A total of 15 families; 36 genera and 53 species are documented herein, including a new genus and seventeen new species; fourteen of which remain under open nomenclature. Most of the trilobites in the British late Silurian are restricted to the shelf, and predominantly occur in the Elton, Bringewood, Leintwardine, and Whitcliffe groups of Wales and the Welsh Borderland. The Elton to Whitcliffe groups represent a shallowing upwards sequence overall; each is characterised by a distinct lithofacies and fauna. The trilobites and brachiopods of the Coldwell Formation of the Lake District Basin are documented, and are comparable with faunas in the Swedish Colonus Shale and the Mottled Mudstones of North Wales. Ludlow trilobite associations, containing commonly co-occurring trilobite taxa, are defined for each palaeoenvironment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Geology of Southern Africa. by ANDREW GEDDES BAIN, ESQ
    Downloaded from http://trn.lyellcollection.org/ at Purdue University Library on June 4, 2015 [ 175 ] VI —On the Geology of Southern Africa. By ANDREW GEDDES BAIN, ESQ. (Communicated by the President.) [Read November 17th, 1852.] PLATES XX.-XXVIII. Introduction. [Abridged.] [BEFORE entering upon the special subject of his Memoir, Mr. Bain gives a sketch of the progress of his geological researches in South Africa, and refers to his former communication, laid before the Society in 1844*, descriptive of the Geology of the Eastern Provinces of the Cape Colony, which was accompanied by Professor Owen's description of the fossil remains of that peculiar reptile the DICYNODON. Desirous of working out the history of this extraordinary creature and its habitat,—and further stimulated and encouraged by the grant of the Wollaston Donation Fund on the part of the Geological Society, and by a grant from the Royal Bounty Fund, through the hands of the late lamented Sir Robert Peel,—the author extended his researches, and sedulously applied himself to work out the geological phenomena of the Colonial territories through which he has now for some time been engaged in carrying out an extensive system of Military Roads. As the basis for his operations, Mr. Bain has used the excellent Ordnance Map, compiled by Mr. Henry Hall of the Royal Engineer Department, and for a copy of which he was indebted to the kindness of the (late) Honourable Mr. Montagu, Secre­ tary to Government, and of Charles Bell, Esq., Surveyor-General of Cape Colony. Before explaining the details of the Geological Map now laid before the Society, Mr.
    [Show full text]