1 Name of the Chapter Headline 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Name of the Chapter Headline 1 Name of the chapter headline 1 1 Chapters 1 The Early Days — 10 2 Isaac Friedlander — 12 3 The Birth of Madera — 16 4 Madera’s Famed Lumber Companies — 20 5 A Base Camp for Yosemite — 24 Copyright © 2020 by Madera Irrigation District 6 Miller and Lux — 26 12152 Road 28 ¼ 7 The First Madera Irrigation District — 30 Madera, CA 93637 8 Maderans Try Again — 34 9 Miller and Lux Strikes Again — 38 All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work in any form whatsoever without permission in writing, except for brief 10 A Truce in the “Seven Year War” — 42 passages in connection with a review. 11 Frustration Mounts — 44 12 The Growth of Small Family Farms in Madera — 46 Madera Irrigation District General Manager: Thomas Greci, P.E. 13 Early Groundwater Overdraft — 48 Madera Irrigation District Assistant General Manager: Dina Nolan, P.E. 14 The Push to Dissolve Madera Irrigation District — 52 Writer: Jeff Crider 15 The Tide Turns — 56 Project Director: Andrea Sandoval 16 A Change of Plans — 58 Graphic Artist: Angie Agostino, AgostinoCreative Proof Readers: Madera Irrigation District staff and Brooke Greci 17 The Feds Step In — 62 Cover: Thousands line up to see water released from Friant Dam into 18 A New Era Begins — 66 the Madera Canal on June 4, 1944. Photo courtesy of Madera County 19 Dreams Eventually Become Reality — 68 Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. 20 The Next Challenge — 74 21 Madera Irrigation District Acquires the Madera Canal and Irrigation Company — 78 Library of Congress Control Number: TXu 2-179-941 22 The 160-Acre Limit — 82 ISBN: 978-0-578-64756-2 23 Flood Control — 86 24 Environmental Litigation — 88 25 Interest Mounts in Creating a Water Bank at Madera Ranch — 90 26 The Azurix Debacle — 94 27 Madera Irrigation District Enters the Fray — 98 28 The Challenge of Stabilizing the Basin — 100 A water tank in the late 1800s. Photo courtesy of Madera County Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. EPILOGUE —102 2 3 Acknowledgements Preface This book is made possible by the Board of Directors of Madera’s history is not widely known, let alone the history Madera Irrigation District, who felt that it was important to of Madera Irrigation District and its hard-fought battles to celebrate the District’s 100th anniversary with a history book provide surface water and groundwater replenishment in that documents the District’s major struggles and triumphs Madera County. as it has worked to provide supplemental water supplies for Madera Irrigation District was the agency that led some irrigation and groundwater replenishment in Madera County. of the key court battles of the 1920s and 1930s against Miller In addition to the Board of Directors, I would like to thank and Lux, the agribusiness giant that often used its legal and Madera Irrigation District staff, especially General Manager financial power to block the creation of irrigation districts in Thomas Greci, Assistant General Manager Dina Nolan, and locations that threatened its water interests. Madera Irrigation Board Secretary Andrea Kwock Sandoval for their assistance, District also played critical roles in the formation of the as well as District Operations Supervisor Manuel Guillen, Don Central Valley Project and in providing the water that farmers Roberts and Steve Emmert. I also owe a great deal of thanks have used to create Madera County’s $2 billion agricultural to Mary Sholler, an archivist in the California History Room economy. at Madera County Library, who helped me find numerous As Madera Irrigation District celebrates its 100th articles and books that provided critical details involving the anniversary, this book is provided as an informational resource early history of Madera as well as historical photos, many that describes the most significant challenges the District has of which are used in this book. Sheryl Berry at the Madera faced over the past century as well as the various strategies Historical Society Museum was also instrumental in helping and initiatives the District has employed in keeping with its me gather photos to document Madera’s early history. mission of providing affordable surface and groundwater I also would like to thank Dr. Kent LaCombe and his supplies to ensure the long-term viability of irrigated staff at the Water Resources Collections and Archives at the agriculture within the District’s 140,000-acre service area. University of California, Riverside, who helped me gather original letters, memorandums, historical newspapers, photos — Thomas Greci, General Manager and other materials involving Harry Barnes, who served as Madera Irrigation District’s Chief Engineer during the District’s first 30 years. While I have worked to thoroughly document all of the sources I have used to compile this book, any errors in fact or interpretation are my own. A Madera family poses for a photo in the late 1800s. Photo courtesy A man watches logs float down the Madera Flume. Photo courtesy of — Jeff Crider of Madera County Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. Madera County Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. 4 5 A busy Madera street scene in the 1930s. Photo courtesy of Madera County Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. Introduction Madera County is California’s 11th most productive agricultural county, producing $2 billion worth of agricultural commodities, including almonds, pistachios, milk and grapes, according to the 2017 crop report from the Madera County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office. No economy can be sustained without water, let alone one based on agriculture. Madera County’s economic success is, therefore, inextricably linked to Madera Irrigation District, which has focused its efforts over the past century on one primary objective: to provide farmers with the water they need to nourish their crops and recharge the local groundwater basin. But while farmers knew from the earliest days that agriculture couldn’t survive long-term in the San Joaquin Valley without supplemental water from the rivers flowing down the west slopes of the Sierra, bringing water from snow-fed rivers to Madera area farmlands proved to be far more difficult than anyone could have imagined. Indeed, while Madera Irrigation District celebrates its 100th anniversary this year, the District’s history and local farmers’ efforts to bring water to local ranches actually stretch back nearly 150 years. That’s because there were actually two Madera Irrigation Districts. The first Madera Irrigation District lasted for only a few years — from 1888 to 1893 — and was litigated into near insolvency by Miller and Lux, the giant cattle and meatpacking firm that didn’t want any competitors challenging its use and control of the San Joaquin River. Miller and Lux owned more California land than any other company in the late 1800s and early 1900s and routinely filed suit against newly formed irrigation districts to avoid paying taxes to them. Such taxes which would be used by districts to pay for reservoirs, canals and other irrigation infrastructure that Miller and Lux had no interest in funding. But before delving into Madera Irrigation District’s history, it’s helpful to consider what Madera County was like in the pioneer days and how its economy evolved as Madera became the terminus for California Lumber Company’s famous 62-mile flume as well as a base camp for visitors bound for Yosemite and, most importantly, as pioneering farmers discovered the valley’s agribusiness potential. The first chapters provide historical descriptions of Madera County from its earliest pioneer days, when it was still part of Fresno County, as well as the achievements of Madera’s earliest pioneers, including the famous California Lumber Company sawmill and its successors, the Madera Flume and Trading Company and the Madera Sugar Pine Lumber Company. The evolution of farming is also documented along with the early recognition that a dam, reservoir and canal would be needed to provide irrigation water for farming and to replenish the local groundwater basin. 6 7 Downtown Madera in the late 1800s. Photo courtesy of Madera County Library, California History Room, Digital Archives. This book describes the efforts of Madera County’s early pioneers, including recognized early on that they could best address local water needs by working with Isaac Friedlander and Thomas E. Hughes, as well as Miller and Lux and the state and, ultimately, federal agencies to achieve the District’s strategic objectives. company’s repeated efforts over a span of half a century to litigate Madera-based Madera Irrigation District eventually sold both the site for Friant Dam and irrigation districts out of existence. Millerton Lake as well as its water rights on the San Joaquin River to the U.S. Indeed, after Madera County voters overwhelmingly approved the formation Bureau of Reclamation. But by working cooperatively with the federal government of the second Madera Irrigation District in 1920, Miller and Lux filed a series of as it built the Central Valley Project, Madera Irrigation District was not only able to lawsuits, using the same legal tactics it employed three decades before when it achieve its own long-term water and flood control objectives, but it was able to help litigated the first Madera Irrigation District into near insolvency. farmers throughout the San Joaquin Valley to gain access to Sierra Nevada water Madera Irrigation District’s first dozen years of existence were marked by supplies. Friant Dam is the northern point of the 152-mile-long Friant Kern Canal, its continual efforts simply trying to survive Miller and Lux’s repeated efforts to which provides water from Sierra Nevada rivers to San Joaquin Valley farmers as far destroy the District or otherwise undermine its plans to build the necessary water south as Bakersfield and the southern point of the Madera Canal, which spans north infrastructure to serve Madera County farmers and forestall, at least in the early to Chowchilla and services Madera Irrigation District.
Recommended publications
  • Madera Subbasin
    MADERA SUBBASIN Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) First Annual Report Prepared by Davids Engineering, Inc Luhdorff & Scalmanini ERA Economics April 2020 DRAFT Madera Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Management Act First Annual Report April 2020 Prepared For Madera Subbasin Prepared By Davids Engineering, Inc Luhdorff & Scalmanini ERA Economics Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. ii List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary (§356.2.a) .................................................................................................. 2 Groundwater Elevations (§356.2.b.1) ........................................................................................ 6 Groundwater Level Monitoring .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KEY to ENDSHEET MAP (Continued)
    KEY TO ENDSHEET MAP (continued) RESERVOIRS AND LAKES (AUTHORIZED) 181.Butler Valley Res. 185. Dixie Refuge Res. 189. County Line Res. 182.Knights Valley Res. 186. Abbey Bridge Res. 190. Buchanan Res. 183.Lakeport Res. 187. Marysville Res. 191. Hidden Res. 184.Indian Valley Res. 188. Sugar Pine Res. 192. ButtesRes. RESERVOIRS AND LAKES 51BLE FUTURE) 193.Helena Res. 207. Sites-Funks Res. 221. Owen Mountain Res. 194.Schneiders Bar Res. 208. Ranchería Res. 222. Yokohl Res. 195.Eltapom Res. 209. Newville-Paskenta Res. 223. Hungry Hollow Res. 196. New Rugh Res. 210. Tehama Res. 224. Kellogg Res. 197.Anderson Ford Res. 211. Dutch Gulch Res. 225. Los Banos Res. 198.Dinsmore Res. 212. Allen Camp Res. 226. Jack Res. 199. English Ridge Res. 213. Millville Res. 227. Santa Rita Res. 200.Dos Rios Res. 214. Tuscan Buttes Res. 228. Sunflower Res. 201.Yellowjacket Res. 215. Aukum Res. 229. Lompoc Res. 202.Cahto Res. 216. Nashville Res. 230. Cold Springs Res. 203.Panther Res. 217. Irish Hill Res. 231. Topatopa Res. 204.Walker Res. 218. Cooperstown Res. 232. Fallbrook Res. 205.Blue Ridge Res. 219. Figarden Res. 233. De Luz Res. 206.Oat Res. 220. Little Dry Creek Res. AQUEDUCTS AND TUNNELS (EXISTING OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION) Clear Creek Tunnel 12. South Bay Aqueduct 23. Los Angeles Aqueduct 1. Whiskeytown-Keswick 13. Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct 24. South Coast Conduit 2.Tunnel 14. Delta Mendota Canal 25. Colorado River Aqueduct 3. Bella Vista Conduit 15. California Aqueduct 26. San Diego Aqueduct 4.Muletown Conduit 16. Pleasant Valley Canal 27. Coachella Canal 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Fresno River Watershed Assessment Project Draft Final Report
    Fresno River Watershed Assessment Project Draft Final Report Prepared for California State Department of Water Resources County of Madera By California State University, Fresno March 2010 This project was funded in part by a grant from the California Department of Water Resources and the County of Madera, California Acknowledgements Special thanks to the Central Sierra Watershed Committee for their support and feedback, which would not be possible without the leadership of Jeannie Habben. Larry Bellew, Tom Wheeler, and Jack Fry provided valuable support and local wisdom. Project director Elissa Brown navigated a diverse interests through logistics including a project freeze. The Madera County Departments of Environmental Health provided critical information and support for GIS-based data and tools. At CSU-Fresno, we thank Dr. Alice Wright and Darrin Alexander who processed all of the bacterial samples. Student Research Assistants Brett Moore, Jorge Baca, Zili He, Steven Gong, Sarah Rutherford, Thomas Gromis, Eddie Alves made the project possible. We also thank the College of Science & Mathematics and Dean Rogerson for support. Finally, thanks to the various landowners in the watershed for your generous property access and concern about your watershed. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Project Objectives and Tasks 2. MONITORING PLAN Background Selection of Sample Locations and Frequency General Field Measurements and Sample Collection 3. HYDROLOGY, WATER QUALITY AND FIRST FLUSH STUDY 4. SEDIMENTATION STUDY TO QUANTIFY SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT 5. BIOASSESSMENT OF SEDIMENTATION & WATER QUALITY 6. SEPTIC INFLUENCES ON FECAL INDICATOR BACTERIA 7. IMPLICATIONS, DATA GAPS, AND FURTHER STUDIES REFERENCES Appendicies Literature review: Septic influences 1. INTRODUCTION The Fresno River is located in Madera County, California and is the most southerly of major east-side tributaries of the San Joaquin River (Figure 1.1).
    [Show full text]
  • River West-Madera Master Plan
    River West-Madera Master Plan APPENDICES Appendix A – River West-Madera Resource Assessment 39 | Page River West-Madera Master Plan River West- Madera Master Plan June 5, 2012 Resource Assessment The River West-Madera area consists of 795 acres of publicly owned land located in Madera County along the northern side of the San Joaquin River between Highway 41 and Scout Island. The Resource Assessment presents the area’s existing characteristics, as well as constraints and opportunities to future planning efforts. River West-Madera Master Plan River West-Madera Master Plan RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... 3 TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 4 EXISTING CHARACTERISITICS ............................................................................................. 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Land Use and History .............................................................................................................................. 7 Cultural History ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Sycamore Island ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Findings of Violation and Order of Compliance: Patrick V
    Certified Mail: 7001 0320 0002 4541 0922 Return Receipt Requested Patrick Richiutti 1970 E. Birkhead Avenue Fresno, CA 93720 Re: Findings of Violation and Order for Compliance under sections 308 and 309(a) of the Clean Water Act, EPA Docket No. CWA-404-309(a)-09-005 Dear Mr. Richiutti, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (“EPA”) has information that, between at least January 2006 and January 2009, you or persons at your direction discharged dredged and/or fill material into the reach of the Fresno River that forms the southern boundary of your property, shown on the Assessor’s Parcel Map as Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 033-160-001 and 033-160-002, without authorization under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This reach of the Fresno River is an integral part the Federal Flood Control Project designated as the Hidden Lake and Fresno River Project. EPA issues the enclosed Findings of Violation and Order for Compliance (“Order”) pursuant to sections 308 and 309(a) of the Clean Water Act. The Findings describe the nature of the violations and the Order requires you to implement a removal and restoration plan (“R/R Plan”) to remove and legally dispose of the unauthorized material and restore the affected area of the Fresno River to its previous channel dimensions and configuration. The R/R Plan must be submitted to EPA for approval and must, at the minimum, include the following components: • Removal of all unauthorized dredged and fill material from the Fresno River; • Disposal of all removed material at appropriate upland locations,
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Adjudication Plan of Administration for the Fresno River
    MADERA IRRIGATION DISTRICT PRE-ADJUDICATION PLAN OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THE FRESNO RIVER As a condition of its State Water Resources Control Board (the “SWRCB”) License No. 13836, Madera Irrigation District (“MID” or the “District”) is obligated to make releases from Hidden Dam to satisfy downstream rights to the waters of the Fresno River, pursuant to the Fresno River Operations Protocols (the “FROP”) and the Fresno River Allocation Model (the “FRAM”). On October 18, 2018, MID filed a Petition for Adjudication of the Fresno River (the “Petition”) with the SWRCB. The Petition was granted at the SWRCB’s October 20, 2020, meeting (the “Effective Date”). MID expects it will take several years for the issues in the Petition to be fully and finally resolved. As a result, to comply with its obligations under the License, MID anticipates the need to manage releases pursuant to the FROP and the FRAM during this time. Over the past several years, MID has received communications from landowners along the Fresno River concerning MID’s implementation of the FROP and the FRAM pending the SWRCB’s resolution of the Petition. Those communications, among other things, request inclusion of various properties, points of diversion, and diversion capacities within the FRAM for future water years pending the resolution of the Petition. To resolve such requests pending the Petition, the District has prepared this Pre-Adjudication Plan of Administration for the Fresno River (the “PAPA”), which provides the guidelines pursuant to which the District intends to resolve such requests pending adjudication. The guidelines identified in the PAPA are based on two primary considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Draft
    Chapter 11 Geology and Soils This chapter describes the affected environment for geology and soils, as well as potential environmental consequences and associated mitigation measures, as they pertain to implementing the alternatives. This chapter presents information on the primary study area (area of project features, the Temperance Flat Reservoir Area, and Millerton Lake below RM 274). It also discusses the extended study area (San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the Merced River, the San Joaquin River from the Merced River to the Delta, the Delta, and the CVP and SWP water service areas). Affected Environment This section describes the affected environment related to geology, geologic hazards, erosion and sedimentation, geomorphology, mineral resources, soils, and salts. Where appropriate, geology and soils characteristics are described in a regional context, including geologic provinces, physiographic regions, or other large-scale areas, with some area-specific geologic maps and descriptions of specific soil associations. Geology This section describes the geology of the primary and extended study areas. Primary Study Area A description of the surficial geologic units encountered in the primary study area is presented in Table 11-1. Geologic maps of the primary study area and the area of project features are presented in Figure 11-1 and Figure 11-2, respectively. Draft – August 2014 – 11-1 Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation Environmental Impact Statement Table 11-1. Description of Surficial Geologic Units of the Primary Study Area Geologic Map of Millerton Lake Quadrangle, West-Central Sierra Nevada, California1 Formation Surficial Deposits General Features Abbreviation Plutonic rocks characterized by undeformed blocky hornblende prisms as long as 1 cm and by biotite books as Tonalite of Blue Canyon much as 5 mm across.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Amendments to the 1994 Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins The Third Edition of the Basin Plan was adopted by the Central Valley Water Board on 9 December 1994, approved by the State Water Board on 16 February 1995 and approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 9 May 1995. The Fourth Edition of the Basin Plan was the 1998 reprint of the Third Edition incorporating amendments adopted and approved between 1994 and 1998. The Basin Plan is in a loose-leaf format to facilitate the addition of amendments. The Basin Plan can be kept up-to-date by inserting the pages that have been revised to include subsequent amendments. The date subsequent amendments are adopted by the Central Valley Water Board will appear at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, all pages will be dated 1 September 1998. Basin plan amendments adopted by the Regional Central Valley Water Board must be approved by the State Water Board and the Office of Administrative Law. If the amendment involves adopting or revising a standard which relates to surface waters it must also be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [40 CFR Section 131(c)].
    [Show full text]
  • Cvp Overview
    Central Valley Project Overview Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation Table Of Contents The Central Valley Project ......................................................2 About the Author .............................................................15 Bibliography ................................................................16 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................16 Government Documents .................................................16 Books ................................................................17 Articles...............................................................17 Interviews.............................................................17 Dissertations...........................................................17 Other ................................................................17 Index ......................................................................18 1 The Central Valley Project Throughout his political life, Thomas Jefferson contended the United States was an agriculturally based society. Agriculture may be king, but compared to the queen, Mother Nature, it is a weak monarch. Nature consistently proves to mankind who really controls the realm. The Central Valley of California is a magnificent example of this. The Sacramento River watershed receives two-thirds to three-quarters of northern California's precipitation though it only has one-third to one-quarter of the land. The San Joaquin River watershed occupies two- thirds to three-quarter of northern California's land,
    [Show full text]
  • Friant Division Facts
    FFrriiaanntt DDiivviissiioonn FFaaccttss FRIANT DAM Type Concrete gravity Location San Joaquin River above Friant, 17 miles northeast of downtown Fresno Groundbreaking Ceremony November 5, 1939 Basic Construction Period 1939-42 (Outlet gates installed in 1944; spillway drum gates installed in 1947) Outlets To the San Joaquin River, Madera Canal and Friant-Kern Canal Power Plants Operated by the Friant Power Authority (on the river and canal outlets), and by the Orange Cove Irrigation District (on a water line supplying the Friant fish hatchery) Named For The nearby town of Friant, recalling pioneer lumberman Thomas Friant Dimensions Structural Height 319 feet (97.23 meters) Hydraulic Height 296 feet (90.2 meters) Top Width 20 feet (6.1 meters) Maximum Base Width 267 feet (81.4 meters) Crest Length 3,488 feet (1,063 meters) Crest Elevation 581.3 feet (177.2 meters) above sea level Total Concrete Volume 2,135,000 cubic yards (1,632,325 cubic meters) Spillway Overflow section at dam's center controlled by three 18- by 100-foot gates, including two new rubberized air-filled bladder gates and one drum gate Elevation, Top of Gates 578.0 feet (176.2 meters) Spillway Crest Elevation 560.0 feet (170.7 meters) Maximum Release To River 59,770 cubic feet per second, on January 3, 1997 MILLERTON LAKE Total Capacity 520,500 acre feet (elevation 578 feet) Record Maximum Storage 530,452 acre feet, on January 3, 1997(elevation 580.01 feet) "Dead" Storage 135,000 acre feet (capacity below canal outlets) "Active" Storage 385,500 acre feet (maximum available for beneficial Friant Division use) Surface Area At Capacity 4,900 acres (1,983 hectares) Maximum Length 15 miles (24.1 kilometers) First Water in Reservoir October 20, 1941 (after temporary river outlets were closed) First Controlled Storage February 21, 1944 (after outlet gate valves were installed) Named For The town of Millerton, county seat of Fresno County from 1856-74, the site of which is inundated by the reservoir.
    [Show full text]