DOCSLIB.ORG

Asceticism and the Other: Angels and Animals in the Egyptian Ascetic Tradition by Daniel Becerra Graduate Program in Religion Du

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asceticism and the Other: Angels and Animals in the Egyptian Ascetic Tradition by Daniel Becerra Graduate Program in Religion Du Asceticism and the Other: Angels and Animals in the Egyptian Ascetic Tradition by Daniel Becerra Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ J. Warren Smith, Supervisor ___________________________ Ellen Muehlberger ___________________________ Maria Doerfler ___________________________ Jennifer Knust ___________________________ Zlatko Pleše Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Asceticism and the Other: Angels and Animals in the Egyptian Ascetic Tradition by Daniel Becerra Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ J. Warren Smith, Supervisor ___________________________ Ellen Muehlberger ___________________________ Maria Doerfler ___________________________ Jennifer Knust ___________________________ Zlatko Pleše An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Daniel Becerra 2019 Abstract The study of Christian asceticism in late antiquity has traditionally been anthropocentric, meaning there is a pervasive focus on ascetic practice as experienced and undertaken by humans in pursuit of a more holy self. More recent scholarly efforts have begun to examine the role of non-human agents in this process, a methodological turn consonant with larger “Post-Humanist” trends in scholarship which seek to redefine humanity’s place in the world as merely one life form among many. To date, however, the majority of these works have been limited in scope and have dealt primarily with the ways in which non-humans, such as angels and animals, were participants in the ascetic lives of humans in various capacities (for example, as companions, guardians, exemplars, food, etc.), to the neglect of how they were also portrayed as beneficiaries of their involvement. This dissertation more fully situates non-humans within scholarly narratives of Christian asceticism by investigating the ways in which late ancient Christian authors implicated non-humans—specifically angels and animals—as beneficiaries of their involvement in the lives of human ascetics. I limit my analysis to literary works associated with the Egyptian ascetic tradition, meaning those which espouse ascetic ideals, inculcate ascetic practices, or model the ascetic lives of Christians living in Egypt during approximately the third through sixth centuries C.E. I make a historical argument which 1) articulates the most prominent discourses relating to non-human benefaction, 2) places these discourses within their social and theological contexts, and 3) attends to the possible reasons for their similarities and particularities across time and space. I argue iv that ascetic life was understood by some ancient Christians to provide a context in which both humans and non-humans could advance toward a more ideal state of being. By tracing how authors depict positive changes in the nature and circumstances of non- humans in ascetic contexts, a portrait of early Christian ascetic life emerges in which humans are neither the sole practitioners nor beneficiaries. v For Emily vi Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….. iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..xi Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………….xii CHAPTER 1 | Introduction……………………………………………………………….1 1.1 Setting the Stage ……………………………………………………………...1 1.2 Individuality and Relationality in the Study of Ancient Christian Asceticism..6 1.2.1 The Individualized Model……………………………………………...7 1.2.2 The Relational Model…………………………………………………10 1.2.2.1 Angels in Ascetic Contexts..……………………………………..15 1.2.2.2 Animals in Ascetic Contexts……………………..………………19 1.3 Purposes and Method of this Study………………………………………….22 1.4 Preview of Findings………………………………………………………….31 1.4.1 Part One: Angel Beneficiaries…………………………………….......31 1.4.2 Part Two: Animal Beneficiaries………………………………………33 CHAPTER 2 | Origen and Angels……………………………………………………...36 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………..36 2.2 Origin, Destiny, and Responsibilities of Angels……………………………..39 2.3 Angelic Benefaction………………………………………………………….45 2.3.1 Nutritive Benefits………………………………………………………..45 2.3.1.1 Spiritual Food and Human Attentiveness to Scripture………..…46 2.3.1.2 Sacrifice and Feasting in Heaven…………………………...........54 2.3.2 Eupathetic Benefits………………………………………………….......60 2.3.2.1 Spectators, Sowers, and Reapers…………..…………………….62 vii 2.3.2.2 Affection for Humans and Sympathy with God’s Eupathy……...66 2.3.3 Animative Benefits……………………………………………………...68 2.3.3.1 Angelic Negligence and Indifference………………………..…..68 2.3.3.2 Stirred out of Stasis and More Efficient Ministration………..…..71 2.3.4 Pistic Benefits…………………………………………………………...74 2.3.4.1 Faith, Knowledge, and the Face of God……………......………..75 2.4 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...80 CHAPTER 3 | Angels and the Egyptian Desert………………………………………...82 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………..82 3.2 Antony………………………………………………………………………..84 3.2.1 Antony, Origen, and Angels…………………………………………....85 3.2.2 Sacrifice, Askesis, and Angelic Benefaction…………………..………..89 3.2.3 Animative Benefits………………………………………..………........91 3.2.4 Reposeful Benefits………………………………………………..…….93 3.3 Ammonas…………………………………………………………………….98 3.3.1 Ammonas on Angels…..………………………………………………..99 3.3.2 Eupathetic Benefits…………………………………..………………..102 3.4 Evagrius…………………………………………………………………….106 3.4.1 Angelic Mobility and Benefaction………...…………………………...107 3.4.1.1 Eupathetic Benefits….………………………………………….109 3.4.1.2 Assistive Benefits…….…………………………………............111 3.4.2 Angelic Stability and Benefaction…...…………………………...114 3.5 Sayings of the Desert Fathers………………………………………………120 3.5.1 Eupathetic Benefits...…………………………………………………..123 3.5.2 Olfactory Benefits…………………………………………...…………125 viii 3.5.3 Intercessory Benefits...…………………………………………………129 3.6 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….133 CHAPTER 4 | Athanasius and Animals………………………………………………139 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………139 4.2 Animals in Athanasius’ Corpus…………………………………………….144 4.2.1 Athanasius among the Philosophers………………………………..…144 4.2.2 Animals in the Life of Antony……………………………………........154 4.3 Irenic Benefits………………………………………………………………164 4.3.1 Fasting…………………………………………………………...……..165 4.3.2 Ethic of Non-violence……………………………………………...…..170 4.4 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….176 CHAPTER 5 | Animals and the Egyptian Desert…………………….……………….179 5.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………179 5.2 Life of Paul…………………………………………………………………182 5.2.1 Animals in the Life of Paul………………………………...……….....184 5.2.2 Intercessory Benefits……………………………………...…………...190 5.3 Sayings of the Desert Fathers………………………………………………195 5.3.1 Animals, Eden, and Human Exceptionalism…………………......…...194 5.3.2 Nutritive Benefits……………………………………………..……….203 5.4 The Histories: History of the Monks in Egypt and Lausiac History………..206 5.4.1 Nutritive Benefits……...………………………………………………207 5.4.2 Healing Benefits………………………………………………..……...212 5.4.3 Irenic Benefits………………………………………………………....217 5.5 Life of Aphou………………………………………………………………..222 5.5.1 Irenic Benefits…..……………………………………………………..227 ix 5.6 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….229 CHAPTER 6 | Conclusion…………………………………………………………….232 6.1 Asceticism and the Other…………………………………………………...232 6.2 Avenues for Future Inquiry…………………………………………………237 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………244 Biography…………………………………………………………………………….....273 x List of Tables Table 1: Jewish Feasts and Attendant Sacrifices………………………………………...58 Table 2: Origen, Antony, and Angelic Benefaction……………………………………..97 Table 3: Origen, Antony, Ammonas, and Angelic Benefaction………………………..105 Table 4: Moral Mobility and Angelic Benefaction……………………………………..133 Table 5: Angelic Benefits………………………………………………………………136 xi Acknowledgements I would like to thank Duke University, the Gurney Harriss Kearns Fund, the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, and the Brigham Young University Religious Studies Center for their financial support. I am also grateful to my committee members, who have both contributed to my formation as a scholar and have helped shape this dissertation. Warren Smith has provided me with years of academic and spiritual guidance, has been generous with his time, and has modeled in both his scholarship and personal life a commitment to “live wisely.” Maria Doerfler is a force to be reckoned with. Her persistent faith in my abilities and encouragement to push myself beyond my comfort zone has made me a better scholar and person. I am grateful to Zlatko Pleše for all of his intellectual midwifery, especially his involvement in teaching me Coptic and for helping me to be a more attentive reader of ancient philosophical texts and monastic literature. Ellen Muehlberger has instilled in me not only a greater confidence in myself but a desire to always think bigger. She represents the kind of mentor I aspire to be. Jennifer Knust’s insights into the ancient Christian world and modern historiography have been instrumental as I have formulated and revised this project. I have been also fortunate throughout my training to have other thoughtful colleagues and mentors who taken interest in my work and intellectual formation. These include but are certainly not limited to: Mike Chin, Elizabeth Clark, Luke Drake, Bart Ehrman, Ben Franklin, Carl
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Study of the Fundamentals of Martin Luther's Theology in The
    The Study of the Fundamentals of Martin Luther’s Theology in the Light of Ecumenism 1 Tuomo Mannermaa Translated and edited by Kirsi Stjerna It is not unusual in the history of academic disciplines that new ideas concerning the fundamentals of a particular discipline emerge either by accident or as a result of impulses from another field of scholarship. This is the case also in today’s Luther research. Two particular fields can be named from most recent history, fields with significant impulses for new insights: ecumenism and philosophy. The philosophical impulses are connected with the task of locating Luther’s theology in regard to both scholasticism, which preceded Luther, and the philosophy of the modern times, which succeeded him. Ecumenism presents its own challenges for Luther research and Lutheran theological tradition. It is the latter issue that I wish to address here, touching upon the issues related to philosophy only as far as it is helpful in light of ecumenical questions at stake. The ecumenical impulses originate, above all, from two sources: Lutheran–Orthodox theological discussions, on the one hand, and Lutheran–Catholic theological encounters, on the other. The challenge issued to Luther research by Lutheran–Orthodox discussions lies in the theme “Luther and the doctrine of divinization,” whereas Lutheran–Catholic cooperation in Luther research has set out to clarify the theme, “Luther as a theologian of love.” Especially the late Catholic Luther specialist Peter Manns has unraveled the latter topic wit h his fruitful Luther interpretation. The first of these two topics, “Luther and theosis (divinization),” is fundamental in the sense that it gives expression to the patristic standard of comparison that all these three denominations share and that can serve as a starting point in their process toward a common understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • “Until the Christian World Begins to Read Its Own Sources with the Contemplative Mind That Is Offered Here, I See Little Hope for Its in Depth Renewal
    “Until the Christian world begins to read its own sources with the contemplative mind that is offered here, I see little hope for its in depth renewal. The argumentative mind that has dominated so much of our recent past has not served history well. Vincent Pizzuto is offering us both inspiration and very readable scholarship here. This is the Great Tradition!” —Fr. Richard Rohr, OFM Center for Action and Contemplation Albuquerque, New Mexico “Denizens of the land of silence owe a debt of gratitude to Vincent Pizzuto for the gift of this book. Clearly written and based on solid scholarship, grounded in Scripture itself, the author clarifies the simplest of truths: to become a contemplative is quite simply a matter of becoming fully normal. Paradoxically our becoming natural involves a lifetime of loves soul-sifting. As Meister Eckhart puts it: ‘The eye with which I see God is the same eye with which God sees me.’ One seeing, one loving, one knowing.” —Martin Laird, OSA Professor of Early Christian Studies Villanova University “A magnificent, nutritious book of spiritual counsel, both visionary and compassionate! Contemplating Christ patiently trains us to rethink familiar texts, feelings, and attitudes by recovering the grandeur of the cosmic Christ from the Gospels, the hymn of Colossians 1, and the teachers of ancient Christianity. This work of mystagogy grasps anew the ‘transgressive’ power of the Incarnation that ‘has made mystics of us all,’ and offers practical ways to live into our wondrous ‘divinized’ identity after baptism. At the same time, it performs microsurgery upon our spiritual practices and predilections (its rethinking of asceticism and of demonic power is particularly fine).
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 Fauna Survey of the Gruyere Gold Project Borefields (Harewood 2016)
    GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LIMITED GRUYERE PROJECT EPA REFERRAL SUPPORTING DOCUMENT APPENDIX 5: LEVEL 1 FAUNA SURVEY OF THE GRUYERE GOLD PROJECT BOREFIELDS (HAREWOOD 2016) Gruyere EPA Ref Support Doc Final Rev 1.docx Fauna Assessment (Level 1) Gruyere Borefield Project Gold Road Resources Limited January 2016 Version 3 On behalf of: Gold Road Resources Limited C/- Botanica Consulting PO Box 2027 BOULDER WA 6432 T: 08 9093 0024 F: 08 9093 1381 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] GRUYERE BOREFIELD PROJECT –– GOLD ROAD RESOURCES LTD – FAUNA ASSESSMENT (L1) – JAN 2016 – V3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE OF WORKS ...............................................................................................1 3. RELEVANT LEGISTALATION ................................................................................2 4. METHODS...............................................................................................................3 4.1 POTENTIAL VETEBRATE FAUNA INVENTORY - DESKTOP SURVEY ............. 3 4.1.1 Database Searches.......................................................................................3 4.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ............................................................3 4.1.3 Existing Publications .....................................................................................5 4.1.4 Fauna
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See APOSTOLIC LETTER CANDOR LUCIS AETERNAE OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS ON THE SEVENTH CENTENARY OF THE DEATH OF DANTE ALIGHIERI SPLENDOUR OF LIGHT ETERNAL, the Word of God became flesh from the Virgin Mary when, to the message of the angel, she responded: “Behold the handmaid of the Lord” (cf. Lk 1:38). The liturgical feast that celebrates this ineffable mystery held a special place in the life and work of the supreme poet Dante Alighieri, a prophet of hope and a witness to the innate yearning for the infinite present in the human heart. On this Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord, I readily add my voice to the great chorus of those who honour his memory in the year marking the seventh centenary of his death. In Florence, which reckoned time ab Incarnatione, 25 March was the first day of the calendar year. Because of its closeness to the spring equinox and the Church’s celebration of the paschal mysteries, the feast of the Annunciation was likewise associated with the creation of the world and the dawn of the new creation through the redemption won by Christ on the cross. It thus invites us to contemplate, in light of the Word made flesh, the loving plan that is the heart and inspiration of Dante’s most famous work, the Divine Comedy, in whose final canto Saint Bernard celebrates the event of the incarnation in the memorable verses: “Within thy womb rekindled was the love, By heat of which in the eternal peace After such wise this flower has germinated” (Par.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooker on Divinization: Our Participation of Christ*
    Hooker on Divinization: our participation of Christ* David Neelands Trinity College, Toronto ABSTRACT: Richard Hooker took very seriously the significance of glorification in his account of Justification and Sanctification. In this he was, like some other Reformation figures, informed by the Patristic notion of theosis or divinization. Theosis also links Hooker’s account of God’s grace with his Christology. To ignore this aspect of his account of engraced human existence is to miss his use of the logic of theosis to confirm the anti- Pelagianism of the Reformation. Glorification For Richard Hooker, glorification is intimately tied to his account of Justification and to the sanctification that inevitably accompanies it. The connection, through the faith that is required as much for glorification as for justification, is described in one of the earliest of Hooker’s compositions: because the last of the graces of God doth so follow the first, that he glorifieth none, but whom he hath justified, nor justifieth any, but whom he hath called to a true, effectual, and lively faith in Christ Jesus, therefore S. Jude exhorting us to build our selves, mentioneth here expresly only faith, as the thing wherein we must be edified; for that faith is the ground and the glorie of all the welfare of this building.1 When Hooker came to write on justification, the surprising Reformation topos for his defence for the controversial view that many of our ancestors /138/ who lived and died in papist errors where nevertheless participants in God’s salvation, he offered a scholastic overview of God’s work of grace in the redeemed, work that includes both sanctification and glorification, as well as justification: * Published in From Logos to Christos: Essays on Christology in Honour of Joanne McWilliam, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Monasticism Old And
    Study Guides for Monasticism Old and New These guides integrate Bible study, prayer, and worship to explore how monastic communities, classic and new, provide a powerful critique of mainstream culture and offer transforming possibilities Christian Reflection for our discipleship. Use them individually or in a series. You may A Series in Faith and Ethics reproduce them for personal or group use. A Vision So Old It Looks New 2 It is hard to be a Christian in America today. But that can be good news, the new monastics are discovering. If the cost of discipleship pushes us to go back and listen to Jesus again, it may open us to costly grace and the transformative power of resurrection life. In every era God has raised up new monas- tics to remind the Church of its true vocation. The Finkenwalde Project 4 Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s project at Finkenwalde Seminary to recover for congregations the deep Christian tradition is a prominent model for young twenty-first-century Christians. Weary of the false dichotomy between right belief and right practice, they seek the wholeness of discipleship in what Bonhoeffer called “a kind of new monasticism.” Evangelicals and Monastics 6 Could any two groups of Christians—evangelicals and monastics—be more different? But the New Monasticism movement has opened a new chapter in the relations of these previously estranged groups. Nothing is more characteristic of monastics and evangelicals than their unshakable belief that one cannot be truly spiritual without putting one’s faith into practice, and one cannot sustain Christian discipleship without a prayerful spirituality.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Bonaventure
    Saint Bonaventure and the Entrance of God Falque Into Theology Saint Bonaventure Saint Bonaventure by Emmanuel Falque and Saint Bonaventure and the Entrance of God Into Theology Into God of Entrance the and Bonaventure Saint translated from French by Brain Lapsa and Sarah Horton The Entrance of God Revised by William C. Hackett Into Theology Properly original, the new version of this essay intends both to nourish debate and differentiate points of view. In its new articulation, the book justifies work that has been carried out since. It justifies the sense of Franciscan rootedness that has never been denied and at the same time opens to the discovery of another reading of the Dominican Thomas Aquinas. The preface specially composed for this American edition, the opening debate with famous medievalist Etienne Gilson, and above all the afterword entitled “Saint Thomas Aquinas and the entrance of God into Philosophy” make it a radically new book. Emmanuel Falque, Professor and honorary dean of philosophy at the Institut Catholique de Paris (ICP), is a philosopher of religion whose research and writing focuses on patristic and medieval philosophy, phenomenology and philosophy of religion. A graduate of the University of Paris IV (Sorbonne), he received his license in Catholic theology summa cum laude from the Centre Sèvres, a university level Jesuit institution in Paris, in 1993, then returned to the Sorbonne to study with Jean-Luc Marion and earned a Ph.D. in philosophy summa cum laude in 1998 and the title of full Professor in 2006. He erved as the 2015 Tipton Visiting Professor in Catholic Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara and held the Gadamer Visiting Professorship Chair in 2016 (Boston College).
    [Show full text]
  • Salvation and Redemption Readings & Reflections
    Salvation and Redemption Readings & Reflections Orthodox Christianity is the life in faith of the Orthodox Church, inseparable from that concrete, historic community and encompassing its entire way of life. The Orthodox Christian faith is that faith "handed once to the saints" (Jude 3), passed on in Holy Tradition to the apostles by Jesus Christ, and then handed down from one generation to the next, without addition or subtraction. The sole purpose of Orthodox Christianity is the salvation of every human person, uniting him to Christ in the Church, transforming him in holiness, and imparting eternal life. This is the Gospel, the good news, that Jesus is the Messiah, that he rose from the dead, and that we may be saved as a result. Soteriology is the study and doctrine of salvation. In the Orthodox Church, salvation is understood as theosis, the infinite process of becoming more and more like God. It is also termed deification or divinization , and its meaning is that the Christian may become more and more soaked with the divine life, becoming by grace what Christ is by nature. As Saint Athanasius the Great said, "God became man so that man might become god." By participation in the incarnation, man becomes like Christ. Salvation is a process which encompasses not only the whole earthly life of the Christian, but also the eternal life of the age to come. It is often described in terms of three stages—catharsis (purification), theoria (illumination) and theosis (divinization). Salvation is thus not only becoming sinless (purification), but it is also a progress in being filled with the divine light.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosis and the Nature of the Persons in the Trinity
    Kenosis and the nature of the Persons in the Trinity David T. Williams Department of Historical and Contextual Theology University of Fort Hare ALICE E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Kenosis and the nature of the Persons in the Trinity Philippians 2:7 describes the kenosis of Christ, that is Christ’s free choice to limit himself for the sake of human salvation. Although the idea of Christ’s kenosis as an explanation of the incarnation has generated considerable controversy and has largely been rejected in its original form, it is clear that in this process Christ did humble himself. This view is consistent with some contemporary perspectives on God’s self-limitation; in particular as this view provides a justification for human freedom of choice. As kenosis implies a freely chosen action of God, and not an inherent and temporary limitation, kenosis is consistent with an affirmation of God’s sovereignty. This view is particularly true if Christ’s kenosis is seen as a limitation of action and not of his attributes. Such an idea does not present problems concerning the doctrine of the Trinity, specifically regarding the relation between the economic and the immanent nature of the Trinity. The Trinitarian doctrine, on the contrary, indeed complements this idea – specifically the concept of perichoresis (the inter- relatedness among the Persons of the Triniy and the relation between the two natures of Christ). Opsomming Kenosis en die aard van die Persone in die Drie-eenheid Filippense 2:7 beskryf die kenosis van Christus – sy vrye keuse om homself te ontledig ter wille van die mens se verlossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysticism and Mystical Experiences
    1 Mysticism and Mystical Experiences The first issue is simply to identify what mysti cism is. The term derives from the Latin word “mysticus” and ultimately from the Greek “mustikos.”1 The Greek root muo“ ” means “to close or conceal” and hence “hidden.”2 The word came to mean “silent” or “secret,” i.e., doctrines and rituals that should not be revealed to the uninitiated. The adjec tive “mystical” entered the Christian lexicon in the second century when it was adapted by theolo- gians to refer, not to inexpressible experiences of God, but to the mystery of “the divine” in liturgical matters, such as the invisible God being present in sacraments and to the hidden meaning of scriptural passages, i.e., how Christ was actually being referred to in Old Testament passages ostensibly about other things. Thus, theologians spoke of mystical theology and the mystical meaning of the Bible. But at least after the third-century Egyptian theolo- gian Origen, “mystical” could also refer to a contemplative, direct appre- hension of God. The nouns “mystic” and “mysticism” were only invented in the seven teenth century when spirituality was becoming separated from general theology.3 In the modern era, mystical inter pretations of the Bible dropped away in favor of literal readings. At that time, modernity’s focus on the individual also arose. Religion began to become privatized in terms of the primacy of individuals, their beliefs, and their experiences rather than being seen in terms of rituals and institutions. “Religious experiences” also became a distinct category as scholars beginning in Germany tried, in light of science, to find a distinct experi ential element to religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character
    The Importance of Athanasius and the Views of His Character J. Steven Davis Submitted to Dr. Jerry Sutton School of Divinity Liberty University September 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I: Research Proposal Abstract .............................................................................................................................11 Background ......................................................................................................................11 Limitations ........................................................................................................................18 Method of Research .........................................................................................................19 Thesis Statement ..............................................................................................................21 Outline ...............................................................................................................................21 Bibliography .....................................................................................................................27 Chapter II: Background of Athanasius An Influential Figure .......................................................................................................33 Early Life ..........................................................................................................................33 Arian Conflict ...................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Towards Animals Demands Veganism
    Justice Towards Animals Demands Veganism Gary Steiner Adapted from Gary Steiner, Animals and the Limits of Postmodernism: A Vegan Manifesto (Columbia University Press, forthcoming 2012). In November 2009, the Sunday immediately prior to the Thanksgiving holiday traditionally celebrated in the United States, I published an opinion piece in the New York Times entitled ‘Animal, Vegetable, Miserable’. ‘Animal, Vegetable, Miserable,’ New York Times, 22 November, 2009, ‘Week in Review’ 12. The traditional Thanksgiving meal is centred around turkey, and my aim in writing the opinion piece was to challenge the supposed moral legitimacy of the practice of killing and consuming animals such as turkeys. I went so far in the piece as to argue that consuming turkeys and other animals raised in ‘free range’ circumstances is in effect no better morally than consuming animals raised in traditional intensive factory farming circumstances—for, after all, in both cases we kill sentient creatures with lives that are meaningful to them just as our lives are meaningful to us, even if non-human animals such as turkeys cannot, as we humans can, reflect on the ways in which their lives are meaningful to them. I received a torrent of responses to my opinion piece, most of which were from people who were supportive of my views. A small but extremely vehement proportion of the responses was from individuals who excoriated me for my views, typically on the grounds that because many animals kill and eat animals, and because human beings are animals, it is therefore perfectly acceptable for human beings to eat non-human animals.
    [Show full text]