Preaching by Thirteenth-Century Italian Hermits
PREACHING BY THIRTEENTH-CENTURY ITALIAN HERMITS George Ferzoco (University of Leicester) It is impossible to say what a hermit is with great precision.1 In the realm of the medieval church, any consultation of that great body of definitions to be found in canonical or legislative texts shows us very little indeed. For example, we know that hermits could own property, and, according to Hostiensis, that they could make wills. Bernard of Parma's gloss briefly addresses the question of whether a hermit can be elected abbot of a monastery. The gloss of Gratian by Johannes Teutonicus says that "solitanus" means "heremiticus", and one would assume that the inverse would hold true.2 Aban doning the realm of canon law, one does find something more helpful in the greatest legislative book for Western monks, the Regula Benedicti. Here, the Rule begins with a definition of four types of monks: two are good, and two are bad. The bad ones are the sarabaites—those who live in community but follow no rule— and the gyrovagues, who travel around continually and are, in Benedict's words, "slaves to their own wills and gross appetites".3 1 Giles Constable's study on hermits in the twelfth century shows the great ambiguity in defining the eremitical life. See Giles Constable, "Eremitical Forms of Monastic Life," in Monks, Hermits and Crusaders in Medieval Europe, Collected Studies Series 273 (London, 1988) 239-64, at 240-1. See also Jean Leclercq, "'Eremus' et 'eremita'. Pour l'histoire du vocabulaire de la vie solitaire," Colùctanea Ordinis Cisteräensium Reformatorum 25 (1963) 8-30.
[Show full text]