Special Tables for Schedueld Castes, Part-IX (Vii), Series-22, Uttar Pradesh

CENSUS· OF INDIA 1981· SERIES 21 UTTAR PR'ADESH PART·IX (vii) SPECIALTABLES FOR SCHEDULED CASTES TabloSC6 :RAVINDRA GUPTA of". IWdifIR AdItItII'd6lTathe Snyice. Direaor or Cen~1I1 Operations. Uttar Pradesh CONTENTS Page y General Note· .;. ix Appendix : List ot Scheduled Castes and Schedul~d Tribe , .. xiii 'Note's on Table SC-6 1 'Table SC-6 Part A Edu~tionallevels of Scheduled Castes-Urban A.r-eas (For each Caste separ~tely) 2 Table SC6 Part B· Bducationallevels of Scheduled Castes-Rural Areas (For each Caste" separately) 478 (iii) FOREWORD Our Constitution provides certain safeguards for Scheduled Castes anu Scheduled Tribes. Such communities are notified by a Presidential Order. For the purpose of the 1981 Census, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976 was adopted. The salient features of this Act have been given in the General Note. The data, thus collected, were processed on computer and the special tables for the Scheduled Castes and SCheduled Tribes have been generated and published in the hope that these will be useful for the planning and implementation of welfare measures in respect of these socially and economically handicapped communities. NEW DELHi, . v·s· VERMA March 3. 1989 ReKistrar Gmual. India (v) PREFACE The processing of data conected during the 1981 Census (or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes' was planned to be carried out on computer on full count. The tables presented in the volumes for.Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are more or ·less on the same pattern as adopted in 1971 . Census with additional information based on the new concepts adopted in 1981 Census. Tables for S.C. and S.T. afe being.presented in the following volumes: 1. Part IX(i) . (Table SC-I)] . 2. Part IX(ii) (TobIe SC- I) In 2 volumes 3. Part IX(iii) (Table SC-2) , 4. Part IX(iv) (Tables SC.3 an<;t SC-4) 5. Part lX(v) (Table SC-S)] . 6. Part IX(vi) (Table SC-5). In 2 volumes. 7. Part IX(vii) . (Table SC-6) 8. Part IX(viii) (Tables ST-! to ST-7) Present 'voltlme contains Table SC-6 The Director of Census Operations, Shri Ravindra Gupta, LAS., under whose guidance the entire operations were carried out, deserves aU credit for the success of the operations. But he had to leave the organisation for taking up other importan~ assignment before tht< volume in question could be made ready for the press. I must record my deepest sense of gratitude to Shri P. Padmamibba, Ex~Registrar General, India and Shri V. S. Verma,' Registrari General, India for their valuable guidance and sincere help to us at every stage to bring out this publication in time. I also thank the officers and staff of the Data Processing Division, Census Division and Printing Cell of the Office of the Registrar.deiteral. India associated with this task. The processing of the data was undertaken by the Data 'Processing Division of the Registrar General's Office under the. able guidance. of S/Shri "C.S. Arora Director (EDP), A. Sen Gupta, Joint Director (Data Processing), K. R. Vnni, Joint Director (Program) and Deputy Directors SjShri Himakar. P. Mehrf!, B.L Jain, B.K. Maratha, R.P. Gupta and late Shri M.P. Rao with the belp of their staff. The Census Division had, taken' over the responsibility of scrutiny of the tables, preparation of General Note and :fI.y~leaves of the publications and this work was very ably carried out under the supervision of Shri N. Rama Rao, Deputy Registrar General (Census &-Tabulation), Shri V.P. Rustagi, Deputy Director and Shri Babu La}, Assistant Director with the help of their team of able assistants who took keen interest in finalising the tables and g~ttjng them ready for printing. In my own o:qi.ce, Shri S.K. Agarwal, DepUty Dilector and Shri M.e. Padalia, .Assistant Directol; assisted by ~hri R.A. Gupta, Statistical Assistant and Shri R.P. Srivastava, COniputor scrutinized and finalized the computor sheets. .' . ." , Shri .B.P. Jain, Depuey Director' (Printing) and his colleagues in the Printing Cell of the office of the Registrar General, India and Shri R.K. Singh. Deputy Director,Shri T.D. Agarwal, Assistant Director, Shri R.K. Saxena, S.T.A. (Printing) and Shri R.P. Srivastava, Computor inmy office have helped in seeing the 'iolume through the press. LUCK NOW Cf.{ANDAN GOPAL March 7, 1989 Director of Census Operations, Uttar Pradesh ('vi1) SPfCfAL TABLES FOR SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDU:I.ED 'tRIBES GENERAL NOTE The present volume provides data pertaining to individual Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The scpecial tables for Schedultd CasteS"and Scheduled Tribes are being published separately since the 1961 Census. The 1981 Census Scheduled Castes and Scbeduled Tribes speciul tabies covered under Part-IX give the data on industrial categories of main workers, marginal workers, type of activity of marginal workers and non-workers, age, sex, marital status, educatio~al . levels etc., for State and District level for each caste and tribe. Most of the tables included in this volunte cortespond to those published in Part-V-A Volume of 197], . A few more tables relating to marginal workers and in respect of those seeking/available for work have also been introduced for the first time in the 198.1 Census. Scheduled Castes and SebeduJed Tribes (n the Indian Censuses prior to 1931.· information was c.oUected and published for each caste and tribe separately. In the 1931 census, tabu·iation of data for individual communities was limited to: (i) exterior castes, (ii) primitive castes and (iii) all other castes with the exception of (a) those whose members fell short of four per thousand of the total population an~ (b) those for which separate figures were deemed to be unnecessary by the local government. ' In the 1941 Census, 'group totals' were tabulated for Scheduled Castes'lTribes and Anglo-Indians. Separate totals were furnished only for a few selected individual tribes. Gov~rnment When preparations for the 1951 Census« were undertaken, the ' of India had already , accepted the policy of official discouragement of community distinctions based on caste. They decided, therefore. that no general race, caste or tribe enquiries should be made but an enquiry should be made regardIng race, caste or tribe only to the extont necessary for providing information relating to certain special groups of the people who are referred to i~ the Constitution of India. The relevant 4rticles are extracted below : Scbeduled' Castes 341(1}: Tbe President may with respect to any State, and where it is a State specified in Part A or Part B of the First Schedule, after consultation with the Governor or Rajpramukh thereof, by public notification, specify the castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races or tribes which shall-for the purposes of thjs Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State. 341(2): Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Castes specified in a D,9tification issued under clause (1) 'any caste,' l,"ace or tribe or part of or group within any caste. race or tribe, but save as aforesaid a notification issued under the said clause shall not be varied by any . subsequent notification. Scheduled Tribes 342(1): The President may with respect to any State, and where it is a State specified in Part A or Part B of the first Schedule. after consultittion with the Governor or Rajpramukh thereof, by public notification, specify the tribes or tribal communities·or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communi ties which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State. ix x 342(2): Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Tril1es specifled in a notification issued under clause (1) any tribe or tribal community or part of or group within any tribe or tribal community, but save as aforesaid a notification iS5ued under the said clause shall not be varied by any sub~equent notification~ From the 1951 Census onwards the Census questionnaire contains items of enquiry to ascertain whether tbe respondent belongs to a Scheduled Caste . or a Scheduled Tribe and if yes, the name of the sCheduled CastejTribe to which he belongs with a view to collecting information for discharging the C~nstitutionalob1igations towJ,lrds these communities. In the Individual Slip (Universal) adopted for the 1981 Census, question 9 makes. an enquiry .about the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tnbe status and. question 10 about the name of the specific Scheduled Caste/Tribe. Likewise, question 3 of the household schedule enquires whether the head of the household belongs to a Scheduled Ca~te or Scheduled Tribe and question 4, the. nl\me of the Scheduled Caste/Tribe of the head of the housebold, if the answer to question 3 is in the affirmative. The statutory lists 'of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are notified in pursuance of Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution. The lists of Scheduled Castes alld Scheduled Tribes were notified for the first time under the C~nstitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) (Part C States) Order. 1951, and the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order. 1950, the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) (Part C States) Order, 1951. These lists have been modified or amended or supple~ mented from time to 'time. On the. reorganisation of the States, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, lists· (Modification), Order came into force from 29th October, 1956. Thereafter, a few orders specifying ScheduleO"Castes/Tribes in respect of a few individual :>tates also came into force.

Load more