UK Parliamentary Election 2019 - Thursday 12 December 2019 the Candidates Standing at the Above Election Are Listed Below

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

UK Parliamentary Election 2019 - Thursday 12 December 2019 The Candidates Standing at the above Election are listed below:- Constituency Name of Candidate Description Address of Candidate Richard Peter BRADLEY Green Party candidate (Address in the Houghton and Sunderland South Constituency) Paul EDGEWORTH Liberal Democrat (Address in the Houghton and Sunderland South Constituency) Richard ELVIN UK Independence Party (UKIP) 3 Lyons Avenue, Easington Lane, DH5 0HS Houghton and Sunderland South Christopher John Charles HOWARTH The Conservative Party Candidate (Address in the Kensington Constituency) Bridget Maeve PHILLIPSON Labour Party (Address in the Houghton and Sunderland South Constituency) Kevin Lawrence YUILL Brexit Party (Address in the City of Durham Constituency) Tom D`SILVA The Conservative Party Candidate (Address in the Kingston and Surbiton Constituency) Julie ELLIOTT Labour Party (Address in the Sunderland Central Constituency) Rachel Sara FEATHERSTONE Green Party candidate (Address in the Sunderland Central Constituency) Sunderland Central Niall Dane HODSON Liberal Democrat 30 Beechwood Terrace, Thornhill, Sunderland, SR2 7LY Dale MCKENZIE Independent (Address in the Sunderland Central Constituency) Viral Kaushikkumar PARIKH Brexit Party 158 Echo Building, Sunderland, SR1 1XH Valerie Margaret ALLEN The Conservative Party Candidate (Address in the Warrington North Constituency) Howard William BROWN Brexit Party (Address in the Easington Constituency) Michal CHANTKOWSKI Green Party candidate (Address in the Sunderland Central Constituency) Washington and Sunderland West Sharon HODGSON Labour Party (Address in the Gateshead Constituency) Keith JENKINS UK Independence Party (UKIP) 52 Robertson Road, Redhouse, Sunderland, SR5 5DX Carlton Lee WEST Liberal Democrat 2 Dorcas Terrace, Concord, Washington, NE37 2QN Printed and published by the (Acting) Returning Officer, Electoral Services, Room 3.17, Sunderland City Council, Civic Centre, Sunderland, SR2 7DN Page 1 of 1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Who Is on the UK Shadow Energy Team?
Oct 15, 2013 10:54 BST Who is on the UK shadow energy team? Last week we wrote a run-down of who was who at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Also last week, Labour leader Ed Miliband decided to re-shuffle his own energy team to provide a new balance to the Tory/Liberal Democrat ran DECC. Caroline Flint Caroline Flint (pictured) has been the shadow energy minister since October 2011, the position that directly shadows Ed Davey. She is already well-known for resigning in 2009 because of disagreements with Gordon Brown's leadership style, and then being re-elected in 2010. She is currently an MP for Don Valley in South Yorkshire which has always been represented by a Labour MP since 1922. She has held various ministerial positions in the Labour front bench such as Minister for Public Health, Minister for Employment, Minister for Housing and Planning, as well as Minister for Europe. Tom Greatrex Tom is a Scottish MP who was voted into the House of Commons in 2010. When he was first voted in he became a member of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee, which he stepped down from later that year. When Ed Miliband became leader he was appointed Shadow Scotland Office Minister until 2011 when he was asked by Ed Miliband to become Shadow Energy Minister with policy responsibility for oil and gas, electricity market reform, renewables, National Grid, and related issues. Jonathan Reynolds Jonathon Reynolds is one of the newest members of the shadow energy team after Miliband's recent re-shuffle.
[Show full text]
THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
[Show full text]
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman 1 FOI Request: FDN
Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman FOI Request: FDN 219443 Des Moore The number of MP referrals received in March 2015, broken down by MP: Referred MP cases Amber Rudd MP 1 Anas Sarwar MP 1 Andrea Leadsom MP 2 Angela Smith MP 1 Caroline Dinenage MP 2 Catherine McKinnell MP 1 Chris Evans MP 1 Chris Kelly MP 1 Christopher Heaton-Harris MP 2 Claire Perry MP 1 Conor Burns MP 1 David Mundell MP 2 David Winnick MP 1 Dominic Raab MP 1 Dr Daniel Poulter MP 1 Dr Liam Fox MP 1 Dr Phillip Lee MP 1 Dr Sarah Wollaston MP 1 Dr Vincent Cable MP 1 Duncan Hames MP 1 Eilidh Whiteford MP 1 Elizabeth Truss MP 1 Esther McVey MP 1 Fiona Bruce MP 1 Gavin Barwell MP 1 Gavin Shuker MP 1 Geraint Davies MP 1 Glyn Davies MP 1 Gordon Henderson MP 1 Helen Jones MP 1 Hugh Robertson MP 1 Ian Paisley Jnr MP 1 Jackie Doyle-Price MP 1 Jeremy Lefroy MP 3 Jessica Lee MP 1 Jim Dowd MP 2 Joan Ruddock MP 3 John Cryer MP 1 John McDonnell MP 3 Jonathan Edwards MP 1 1 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Jonathan Evans MP 1 Jonathan Lord MP 1 Julie Elliott MP 1 Julie Hilling MP 1 Karl Turner MP 1 Kate Green MP 1 Kevin Brennan MP 1 Lilian Greenwood MP 1 Liz Kendall MP 1 Marcus Jones MP 1 Mark Pawsey MP 1 Mark Spencer MP 1 Mark Tami MP 1 Matt Hancock MP 3 Michael Fabricant MP 2 Mike Crockart MP 2 Mr Adam Afriyie MP 2 Mr Adrian Sanders MP 4 Mr Andrew Miller MP 1 Mr Andrew Rosindell MP 1 Mr Andrew Selous MP 1 Mr Andrew Turner MP 3 Mr Andrew Tyrie MP 1 Mr Andy Love MP 3 Mr Andy McDonald MP 1 Mr Austin Mitchell MP 1 Mr Barry Gardiner MP 3 Mr Barry Sheerman MP 2 Mr Bernard
[Show full text]
Vonne Directory 46Pp
VONNE Directory 2016 Contents North East VCSE Networks 3 Local Infrastructure Organisations and Volunteer Centres 6 Key North East funders 9 Local authorities and their VCSE leads 13 Key public sector contacts 15 North East MPs and MEPs 19 Health and Wellbeing Landscape 22 NHS England 22 Public Health England 23 Directors of Public Health 24 Health and Wellbeing Boards 25 Clinical Commissioning Groups 28 Local Authority Adult Social Care Services 30 North East Care Act Leads 31 Healthwatch 32 North East Joint Strategic Needs Assessments 33 Care Quality Commission 35 Clinical Networks and Senate 36 Sustainability and Transformation Plans 39 North East Health Scrutiny Bodies 40 Criminal Justice System in the North East 41 Directory Welcome to our annual directory of key contacts for the VCSE in the North East. From major funders, public sector agencies, to MPs, health and criminal justice contacts, it’s the must have publication to have on your desk for the coming year. We hope you find it useful and welcome your feedback on it. 2 North East VCSE Networks This is a list of VCSE focused networks and forums that operate across the North East. Some are multi- agency networks, but have been included as they are significant for the VCSE. This list is by no means exhaustive, and if you know of a regional VCSE network that should be included please let us know. We’ll be keeping an up-to-date list of these networks on our website at www.vonne.org.uk/directories. Network Remit Contact Criminal Justice Forum allowing a two way stream of information North East Criminal sharing with regards to national policy change [email protected] Justice Policy Forum and regional responses.
[Show full text]
Labour Party General Election 2017 Report Labour Party General Election 2017 Report
FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT LABOUR PARTY GENERAL ELECTION 2017 REPORT Page 7 Contents 1. Introduction from Jeremy Corbyn 07 2. General Election 2017: Results 11 3. General Election 2017: Labour’s message and campaign strategy 15 3.1 Campaign Strategy and Key Messages 16 3.2 Supporting the Ground Campaign 20 3.3 Campaigning with Women 21 3.4 Campaigning with Faith, Ethnic Minority Communities 22 3.5 Campaigning with Youth, First-time Voters and Students 23 3.6 Campaigning with Trade Unions and Affiliates 25 4. General Election 2017: the campaign 27 4.1 Manifesto and campaign documents 28 4.2 Leader’s Tour 30 4.3 Deputy Leader’s Tour 32 4.4 Party Election Broadcasts 34 4.5 Briefing and Information 36 4.6 Responding to Our Opponents 38 4.7 Press and Broadcasting 40 4.8 Digital 43 4.9 New Campaign Technology 46 4.10 Development and Fundraising 48 4.11 Nations and Regions Overview 49 4.12 Scotland 50 4.13 Wales 52 4.14 Regional Directors Reports 54 4.15 Events 64 4.16 Key Campaigners Unit 65 4.17 Endorsers 67 4.18 Constitutional and Legal services 68 5. Labour candidates 69 General Election 2017 Report Page 9 1. INTRODUCTION 2017 General Election Report Page 10 1. INTRODUCTION Foreword I’d like to thank all the candidates, party members, trade unions and supporters who worked so hard to achieve the result we did. The Conservatives called the snap election in order to increase their mandate.
[Show full text]
…The New Working Dress Code
Volume 37 Number 1 Energy Data Taskforce report – Laura Sandys CBE The Impact of Net Zero on Energy Infrastructure – Sir John Armitt April 2020 New Shadow Cabinet Extract from the Budget Speech ENERGY FOCUS …the new working dress code This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in Energy Focus are those of the individual organisations and contributors and doBack not necessarily to Contents represent the views held by the All-Party Parlia- mentary Group for Energy Studies. The journal of The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies Established in 1980, the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies remains the only All-Party Parliamentary Group representing the entire energy industry. PGES aims to advise the Government of the day of the energy issues of the day. The Group’s membership is comprised of over 100 parliamentarians, 100 associate bodies from the private, public and charity sectors and a range of individual members. Published three times a year, Energy Focus records the Group’s activities, tracks key energy and environmental developments through parliament, presents articles from leading industry contributors and provides insight into the views and interests of both parliamentarians and officials. PGES, Room 2.2, Speaker’s House, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA www.pges.org.uk Executive
[Show full text]
Whole Day Download the Hansard
Thursday Volume 635 1 February 2018 No. 90 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 1 February 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 953 1 FEBRUARY 2018 954 Mr Walker: The Government have been talking to a House of Commons wide range of industry groups and representative bodies of business, and we recognise that there are benefits in some areas of maintaining regulatory alignment and Thursday 1 February 2018 ensuring that we have the most frictionless access to European markets. Of course we are entering the The House met at half-past Nine o’clock negotiations on the future partnership, and we want to take the best opportunities to trade with Europe and the wider world. PRAYERS Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con): Is it true that Michel Barnier has basically offered us the Canada [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] model, agreement on which could be reached this year, thus negating the need for any transition period? Mr Walker: The Government’s policy is that we are Oral Answers to Questions pursuing a bespoke trade agreement, not an off-the-shelf model. We believe that it will be in the interests of both sides in this negotiation to secure an implementation period. EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab): The European The Secretary of State was asked— Union has clearly and firmly set out its views on the options for these negotiations. Ministers so far have Regulatory Equivalence signally failed to provide any coherent response because they cannot agree among one another, and the Minister’s 1.
[Show full text]
Israel/Palestine: in Search of the Rule of Law Essays on Equality, Rights and Responsibilities
Israel/Palestine: in search of the rule of law Essays on equality, rights and responsibilities Sir Vincent Fean Rt Hon Jack Straw Rt Hon Baroness Tessa Blackstone Dr Philippa Whitford MP Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP Julie Elliott MP Crispin Blunt MP Layla Moran MP Daniel Seidemann Daniel Levy Hannah Weisfeld Dr Phyllis Starkey Sir Stephen Sedley Chris Doyle www.balfourproject.org Contents Essays in advance of the 3 Introduction free online conference Sir Vincent Fean KCVO 5 Balfour Project Statement 8 Calling an end to ’another dead Palestinian’ Israel/Palestine: Rt Hon Jack Straw 11 Why the UK must recognise the State of Palestine now in search of the Baroness Tessa Blackstone rule of law 14 Annexation: Palestinians are still waiting for the protection of internationalIT SUPPORT law SOLUTIONS Chris Doyle held on the afternoons of 17 Distinguishing between Israel and the illegal settlement project Dr Phyllis Starkey 25 & 26 May 2021 20 UNRWA: the lifeline for Palestinian refugees Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP Measuring the 23 Palestine: right to health in the Occupied Palestinian Territory distance between Dr Philippa Whitford MP international law — 27 Defenceless: Palestinian children in Israeli military detention Sir Stephen Sedley which Britain has 29 Forced displacement of Palestinians in East Jerusalem pledged to uphold — Daniel Seidemann and the lived reality 32 Accountability to the law replaces politics for this politician seeking in the Occupied justice for Palestinians Palestinian Territory. Crispin Blunt MP 35 Ending the occupation is in the interests of all Recordings of the Hannah Weisfeld 37 Three pillars for a new US approach to peace conference are available Daniel Levy on the 41 Connecting Parliaments in Europe for Israeli/Palestinian equality Balfour Project website.
[Show full text]
Whole Day Download the Hansard
Monday Volume 687 18 January 2021 No. 161 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 18 January 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 601 18 JANUARY 2021 602 David Linden [V]: Under the Horizon 2020 programme, House of Commons the UK consistently received more money out than it put in. Under the terms of this agreement, the UK is set to receive no more than it contributes. While universities Monday 18 January 2021 in Scotland were relieved to see a commitment to Horizon Europe in the joint agreement, what additional funding The House met at half-past Two o’clock will the Secretary of State make available to ensure that our overall level of research funding is maintained? PRAYERS Gavin Williamson: As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, the Government have been very clear in our [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] commitment to research. The Prime Minister has stated Virtual participation in proceedings commenced time and time again that our investment in research is (Orders, 4 June and 30 December 2020). absolutely there, ensuring that we deliver Britain as a [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] global scientific superpower. That is why more money has been going into research, and universities will continue to play an incredibly important role in that, but as he Oral Answers to Questions will be aware, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy manages the research element that goes into the funding of universities.
[Show full text]
Arts Lottery Funding Recipient Constituencies Per Capita, 2015 & 2016 Combined
Arts Lottery funding recipient constituencies per capita, 2015 & 2016 combined Published 25 May 2017 Following on from The Stage article ‘Revealed: Which UK constituencies get the most – and least – Lottery cash for the arts’ below is the full list of Arts Lottery funding across 659 UK Parliamentary Constituencies per capita. DCMS publishes details of all lottery grant recipients on their website. If you combine all ‘Arts’ awards across the UK in 2015 and 2016 and then divide by the overall size of the electorate, the average per capita amount per constituent across the UK is £13.10, excluding the 1,928 grants worth £101 million that were not designated to a constituency (16% of the total amount of grants awarded). £ Total Arts Lottery £ Per UK Constituency MP Grants Capita 2014 & 2015 1 Leeds Central Hilary Benn (L) 46,596,403 569.65 2 Cities of London and Westminster Mark Field (C) 34,290,940 562.22 3 Birmingham, Ladywood Shabana Mahmood (L) 33,109,864 485.99 4 Cardiff South and Penarth Stephen Doughty (L Co-op) 25,727,041 338.49 5 Islington South and Finsbury Emily Thornberry (L) 14,673,010 215.38 6 Glasgow Central Alison Thewliss (SNP) 12,337,293 173.9 7 Hackney South and Shoreditch Meg Hillier (L Co-op) 10,926,061 128.59 8 Manchester Central Lucy Powell (L Co-op) 10,701,760 124.33 9 Vauxhall Kate Hoey (L) 10,020,186 121.85 10 Bristol West Thangam Debbonaire (L) 10,427,938 114.3 11 Edinburgh East Tommy Sheppard (SNP) 7,375,694 109.85 12 Poole Robert Syms (C) 7,904,345 108.94 13 Bermondsey and Old Southwark Neil Coyle (L) 8,514,689
[Show full text]
Invest, Don't Cut the Predicted Impact of Government Policy on Funding For
Invest, Don’t Cut The predicted impact of Government policy on funding for schools and academies by 2020 A report by NUT and ATL This report presents findings from an NUT / ATL interactive website which demonstrates the likely impact on schools and academies of the Government’s current school funding policies and its plan to redistribute existing funding between schools in England - www.schoolcuts.org.uk The interactive website allows users to access detailed predictions for every school’s funding per pupil in real terms, as affected by the Government’s proposal to implement a new funding formula for schools alongside a freeze in funding per pupil and cost increases imposed by Government. The predictions are based on publicly available government data and the most robustly constructed proposed funding formula for schools currently available. With schools already struggling to cope, the Government plans what the Institute for Fiscal Studies has described as the largest real terms cut in school funding in a generation. We know that children are already suffering – class sizes are rising, curriculum choices are being cut, pupils with special educational needs and disabilities are losing vital support and school staff are losing their jobs. Instead of investing more money in education to address the funding shortages already hitting schools and academies, the Government plans only to move existing money around the country through a new funding formula. For every school which gains from this, others will lose – and almost every school will lose when the impact of inflation and other cost increases, against which the funding freeze offers no protection, are also taken into account.
[Show full text]
North East Referendum Campaigns
NORTH EAST REFERENDUM 2004: CAMPAIGNING REPORT FOR THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION by Professor David Denver (Department of Politics and International Relations, Lancaster University) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Campaigners • The organisations which played a significant part in the Assembly campaign were: For Yes For No Yes4thenortheast (Y4NE) North East Says No (NESNO) The Labour Party North East No Campaign (NENC) The Liberal Democrats The Conservative and Unionist Party The TUC (Northern Region) UK Independence Party (UKIP) GMB Unison • Y4NE and NESNO were the respective ‘designated organisations’. All other groups listed on the Yes side were affiliated with Y4NE; on the No side the Conservatives and UKIP were affiliated with NESNO but NENC ran an independent campaign. • Other groups registered as participants – the Senior Citizens Party, the British National Party and the English Democrats party – played little or no part in the campaign. Campaigning • The core activities of effective constituency campaigns in general elections are identifying supporters and mobilising them on polling day but this approach was not possible in the referendum because voting was by post and was spread over several days, party workers were not as enthusiastic as in a general election and party records of past voting in elections are not necessarily a good guide to referendum voting. • Nonetheless, there was vigorous campaigning involving: A leaflet delivered free to every elector (designated organisations only) Leaflets and stickers distributed by volunteers/street stalls E-mailing members and known supporters Press advertising and billboards Visits by party VIPs and endorsements by celebrities Public debates (some sponsored by the Newcastle Journal) Press releases Campaign ‘stunts’ Campaign television broadcasts (two each by Y4NE and NESNO) 1 • The designated organisations each had a website but neither thought this a very effective campaign tool.
[Show full text]