METEORITES by Brian MASON*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

METEORITES by Brian MASON* METEORITES BY Brian MASON* Outer space is a theme which in its many variations affects all of us today. Plans are made to send manned vehicles to the moon, and ultimately to our neighboring planets. Science fiction authors would extend our range even further, to the distant stars. Adventure seekers now look to interplanetary travel, rather than the Antarctic or Mt. Everest, to satisfy the lure of the unknown and their thirst for fame or notoriety. The firing of man- made missiles into outer space may be considered as a form of retaliation, as the Earth has been bombarded from outer space since the beginning of time. Fortunately, most of these extraterrestrial missiles burn up in the atmosphere and reach the ground as fine dust. However, occasionally a larger piece survives this perilous passage, lands on the Earth, and is eventually collected. Such pieces are known as meteorites, which we collect and preserve as the only tangible samples of the great universe that exists beyond the Earth. We are fortunate that the frequency of fall is very low, otherwise more of us would suffer the unique and undesirable experience of Mrs. HODGES of Sylacauga, Alabama who, on Nevember 30, 1954, was bruised when a meteorite broke through the roof of her house and struck her on what was delicately described as her upper thigh ! There are well-authenticated records of meteorite falls as far back as the fifteenth century, but our ancestors were skeptical about reports of stones falling from the sky. It was not till early last century that scientists were convinced of the fact that stones from outer space do fall on the earth's surface. In the U. S. the fall of more than 100 kilograms of stones near Weston, Connecticut, at 6 : 30 a. m. on December 14, 1807, was extensively reported on by Professors SILLIMAN and KINGSLEY of Yale University. However, skepticism was still rife, because even the then President, Thomas JEFFERSON, ventured the opinion that it was easier to believe that Yankee professors would lie than to believe that stones would fall from heaven ! Once it is admitted that falls actually occur, the question naturally arises : What is the frequency of meteorite falls ? This is not an easy problem to resolve. In most places there is no one to observe a fall when it occurs, and the probability of its being picked up afterwards depends on many chance factors. A study of the frequency of meteorite falls in densely populated areas indicates that the average rate of fall of meteorites on the Earth probably lies between 0.3 and 1 .0 falls per year per million square kilometers which is between about 150 & 500 annually for the whole earth. This would mean between two and eight falls a year within continental United States. No great reliance can be placed on this estimate, although it is probably of the right order of magnitude. Occasionally there have been falls of large meteorites which must have forced themselves on the attention of any observer who was within hundreds of miles of the spot. Such a case was that of the Tunguska meteorite, which fell in an uninhabited region of northern Siberia on June 30, * Chairman , Department of Mineralogy, The American Museum of Natural History, New York ; Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), No. 723, 1961 43 194 Brian MASON 1908. The impact was felt as an earthquake along the Trans-Siberian railway, 500 miles to the south, and the forest surrounding the point of impact was felled radially outwards for a distance of 60 km. Meteor Crater in Arizona (Fig. 1), 1,300 meters across and 200 meters deep, is evidence of a similar meteorite fall in prehistoric times, and meteorite cra - ters are known from other parts of the world (generally in deserts, where erosion is very slow, and hence the crater survives). The largest meteorite " in captivity " is the Cape York, which weighs 34 tons (Fig. 2) ; it was brought back from Greenland by Admiral PEARY in 1896, and is now in The American Museum of Natural History. The largest known meteorite is the Hoba iron, which still lies where it was found, on a farm in Southwest Africa, (Fig. 3) ; its weight is probably about 70 tons. Fig . 1 Fig . 2 Fig . 3 Meteorites are classified according to their composition into three groups : the irons, the stony-irons, and the stones. There is a possible fourth group, the tektites, which are small glassy objects which have been found in isolated areas in several parts of the Earth (Australia, Southeast Asia, Czechoslovakia, Texas and Georgia) ; they are different from known terrestrial glasses, but since no one has ever seen a tektite fall, their classification as meteorites is still disputed. Meteorites are named after the nearest geographical location where they fell or were found. There are about 1,500 well- authenticated meteorites, using the term meteorite for a single fall-each fall may however comprise many individual pieces (tens of thousands of fragments have been picked up around Meteor Crater, and the Holbrook, Arizona fall of 1912 was made up of over 14,000 individual stones. A common misconception is that all 44 Meteorites 195 or most meteorites are irons. It is true that the largest meteorites are all irons, and that in our museum collections irons generally dominate over stones. However, if we examine the statistics of finds (meteorites found but not seen to fall) versus falls (those collected after having been seen to fall), we see a remarkable reversal in the proportions of different types between the finds and the falls (Tab . 1). The reason is not far to seek. The relative abundance of irons as finds is due to their being easily recognized as meteorites , whereas a stony meteorite unless seen to fall could easily be overlooked as such. If we were to plot on a map the finds of meteorites in the United States we might conclude that the Great Plains have been bombarded whereas New England had been mysteriously spared . The reason is that any stone on the Great Plains attracts attention, whereas in the rocky terrain of lo!e w England it has to be a very unusual stone to attract a second glance. Thus we get a truer indication of the relative abundance of the different meteorite types from the relative proportions of those actually seen to fall ; this shows that the stone meteorites are far more abundant than all other types. Table 1 . Frequency of meteorite finds and falls (From PRIOR & HEY 1953) The iron meteorites consist essentially of an iron-nickel alloy, the average composition being about 91% iron, 8 . 5% nickel, and 0 . 5% cobalt. All miteoritic iron contains nickel, and a test for this metal is usuful for eliminating specimens of cast iron and similar material which are often picked up and sent in to the museum as possible meteorites. The iron meteorites commonly contain small rounded inclusions of troilite (iron sulphide) and schrei- bersite (iron-nickel phosphide). The metal generally shows a definite structure, known as Widmanstatten figures, which is brought out by etching a polished surface with acid (Fig. 4). The Widmanstatten structure is a network of bands crossing one another in two, three, or four directions. The bands are composed of kamacite (a nickel-iron alloy with about 6% of nickel), bordered by thin lamellae of a nickel-rich alloy called taenite. The angular interstices of the network are filled with a fine-grained mixture of kamacite and taenite, known as plessite. This structure is the result of a chemical segregation after the metal crystallized. The nickel-iron must have been originally molten, and then solidified as large crystals of a homogeneous nickel-iron solid solution. However, on further cooling this solid solution was no longer stable ; it broke down into a mixture of two phases--a nickel-poor one (kamacite) and a nickel-rich one, taenite. The regular arrangement of the bands results from their being oriented parallel to the octahedral planes in the original homoge- neous crystal of nickel-iron (Fig. 5). Such a structure is typical of an alloy cooled very slowly after crystallization. The stony-iron meteorites are made up of nickel-iron and iron-magnesium silicate 45 196 Brian MASON Fig . 4 Fig . 5 minerals in approximately equal amounts. The silicate mineral is generally olivine, (Mg, Fe)2 SiO4, occasionally with some pyroxene, (Mg, Fe) SiO3. Commonly the olivine occurs as rather large rounded grains in a sponge-like network of nickel-iron (Fig. 6). It is interesting to note that a meteorite of this type, weighing about 1,500 pounds, was found near Krasnojarsk in Siberia in 1749, and was seen by the Swedish traveller P. S. PALLAS in 1772, who recognized that it must be of extraterrestrial origin. Stony-iron meteorites of this type are known as pallastites, in his honor. The stones are the most abundant meteorites, and also show the greatest variety in composition and structure. They are divided into two groups on the basis of structure, the chondrites and the achondrites. The chondrites are so named because of the presence of chondri or chondrules, which are small (generally about one millimeter in diameter) rounded bodies consisting of olivine or pyroxene (Fig. 7). The achondrites are without chondri, and are much more coarsely crystallized that than the chondrites. Chondrites are far more common than achondrites, making up over 90% of all stones. Fig . 6 Fig . 7 Mineralogically most chondritic meteorites are a mixture of olivine and pyroxene, generally with some nickel-iron (usually between 5% and 20%), troilite (about 5%), and plagioclase, socium calcium aluminosilicate (about 10%).
Recommended publications
  • Spring 1998 Gems & Gemology
    VOLUME 34 NO. 1 SPRING 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 The Dr. Edward J. Gübelin Most Valuable Article Award FEATURE ARTICLE 4 The Rise to pProminence of the Modern Diamond Cutting Industry in India Menahem Sevdermish, Alan R. Miciak, and Alfred A. Levinson pg. 7 NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES 24 Leigha: The Creation of a Three-Dimensional Intarsia Sculpture Arthur Lee Anderson 34 Russian Synthetic Pink Quartz Vladimir S. Balitsky, Irina B. Makhina, Vadim I. Prygov, Anatolii A. Mar’in, Alexandr G. Emel’chenko, Emmanuel Fritsch, Shane F. McClure, Lu Taijing, Dino DeGhionno, John I. Koivula, and James E. Shigley REGULAR FEATURES pg. 30 44 Gem Trade Lab Notes 50 Gem News 64 Gems & Gemology Challenge 66 Book Reviews 68 Gemological Abstracts ABOUT THE COVER: Over the past 30 years, India has emerged as the dominant sup- plier of small cut diamonds for the world market. Today, nearly 70% by weight of the diamonds polished worldwide come from India. The feature article in this issue discuss- es India’s near-monopoly of the cut diamond industry, and reviews India’s impact on the worldwide diamond trade. The availability of an enormous amount of small, low-cost pg. 42 Indian diamonds has recently spawned a growing jewelry manufacturing sector in India. However, the Indian diamond jewelery–making tradition has been around much longer, pg. 46 as shown by the 19th century necklace (39.0 cm long), pendant (4.5 cm high), and bracelet (17.5 cm long) on the cover. The necklace contains 31 table-cut diamond panels, with enamels and freshwater pearls.
    [Show full text]
  • Naretha Meteorite (Synonyms Kingoonya, Kingooya)
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1976, 4 (1) NARETHA METEORITE (Sync;>nyms: Kingoonya, Kingooya) W.H. CLEVERLY* [Received 27 May 1975. Accepted 1 October 1975. Published 31 August 1976.1 ABSTRACT Much of the missing portion of the Naretha (Western Australia) meteorite has been located in museums as an un-named specimen and as two smaller specimens masquerading under the name 'Kingoonya' (or 'Kingooya'). The use of the junior synonyms with their implications of a South Australian site of find should be discontinued. INTRODUCfION Naretha meteorite, an L4 chondrite, was found in 1915 about 3 km north of the 205-mile station during construction of the Trans-Australian Railway. It was broken into at least three major pieces which were acquired by Mr John Darbyshire, Supervising Engineer for the construction of the western end of the railway (construction was proceeding simultaneously from both Kalgoorlie and Port Augusta ends - Fig. 1). Mr Darbyshire donated the meteorite to the W.A. School of Mines in Kalgoorlie where one' piece was retained and exhibited with a photograph of the reassembled meteorite (Fig. 2). A second fragment which was passed on to the Geological Survey of Western Australia was noted briefly by Simpson (1922) who first used the name 'Naretha', the name which had been given to the 205-mile station. There is strong presumptive evidence that the third fragment was passed on to Mr S.F.C. Cook of Kalgoorlie, a private collector from whose inaccurate verbal statements and undocumented collection, the subsequent confusion arose. In late 1926 Mr Cook gave a small piece of 'meteorite to Mr G.W.
    [Show full text]
  • 1971 August Council Minutes
    Minutes of the Council Meeting of the Meteoritical Society 34th Annual Meeting August, 1971 Tubingen, West Germany The meeting convened at 8:00 p.m. with President Wood presiding. In attendance were Vice Presidents Edward Anders and Robin Brett, Secretary Ted Bunch, Treasurer Ursula Marvin, Editor Carleton Moore, Director Meteor Section Peter Millman, Councilors Vagn Buchwald, Don Gault, Ahmed El Goresy, Ian Halliday and John Wasson. Also in attendance was Denis Shaw, Executive Editor of GCA. Visitors attending included Roy Clarke, Jr., and Peter Eberhardt. Program, 34th Annual Meeting President Wood presented the meeting program, followed by a brief discussion. The Council unanimously approved the program. Minutes and Secretary's Report The Secretary presented the minutes of the Council meeting of April 15, 1971 (Washington, D. C.) that were recorded by the Acting Secretary, Ursula Marvin. The minutes were approved as submitted. The Secretary presented a report to the Council summarizing membership activity and also informed the Council that he was the Society's Representative to the 24th International Geologic Congress in 1972. Treasurer's Report The Treasurer presented two balance sheets and pointed out that we are operating at an overall yearly deficit of approximately $1000. After consultation with the Editor, C. B. Moore, the Treasurer stated that the major cause of the deficit is the publication costs of Meteoritics ($1100jissue). Several suggestions were made to improve the situation. Brett suggested that we increase the membership for larger dues income. Bunch suggested a membership booth be established at the Meeting. Anders suggested a drive to increase library subscriptions. The President offered to contact the Membership Committee Chairman, Terry Offield, for initiating a membership drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Antartic Meterorite Newsletter Volume 3
    A periodical issued by the Antarctic Meteorite Working Group to inform scientists of the basic characteristics of specimens recovered in the Antarctic. I Volume 3, Number March, 1980 I Supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Polar Programs, and compiled at Code SN2, Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, Texas 77058 The Meteorite Working Group will meet next on April 10, 1980, to consider sample requests for Antarctic meteorites. Please submit requests to: John O. Annexstad Secretary, Meteorite Working Group Curator's Branch/SN2 NASA-JohnsonSpace Center Houston, TX 77058 Availability of Large Chondrites for Studies of Cosmic-Ray-lnteractions: Two large ordinary chondrites, Allan Hills 78084 (_ 15 kg) and Meteorite Hills 78028 (_ 20 kg), appear to be complete specimens in that they are nearly fully covered with a fusion crust. Preliminary examination suggests that neither meteorite is appreciably weathered or fractured. It is the intention of the MWGthat samples of one of these meteorites be made available to investigators wishing to make detailed studies of products of cosmic ray interactions as a function of depth in a relatively large chondrite. For such studies, the MWG will entertain moderately elaborate requests for multiple samples from accurately determined subsurface depths. The MWGwill also entertain requests from investi- gators who wish to organize and lead a consortium-like study of the products of cosmic ray interactions in one of these chondrites. Although the descriptions and petrographic classifications of these chondrites will not be announced until the next Newsletter, persons wishiing to participate in the planned investigations of cosmogenic products are encouraged to transmit a sample request or a statement of their intent to participate to the MWGbefore the April meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • 1/Keticanjfllsdum
    >1/keticanJfllsdum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2069 DECEMBER 29, I96I The Composition of the Ottawa, Chateau-Renard, Mocs, and New Concord Meteorites BY BRIAN MASON' AND H. B. WIIK2 THE OTAWA, KANSAS, METEORITE This meteorite fell near Ottawa, Kansas, on the evening of April 9, 1896. The only accounts of this fall we have been able to trace ap- peared in the Ottawa Weekly Times of April 16, 1896, and in the Ottawa Weekly Herald of the same date. The latter reads as follows: "A meteorite, weighing 31 ounces, was on exhibition at C. L. Becker and Co.'s drug store last week which fell the evening of April 9 on the farm ofJ. T. Black, nine miles northwest of town. The surface of the meteorite was blackened as though it had been subjected to great heat. It is globular in form, with an uneven surface." The account from the Ottawa Weekly Times reads as follows: "Last Thursday afternoon while Joe Black, of this city, was out to his farm northeast of Peoria, and was at work in his orchard trimming trees, between five and six o'clock, there was a terrific explosion in mid air just above him, followed by a number of explosions in quick succes- sion resembling the fireing of musketry. The sky was clear; not a cloud was visible; the heavens appeared to be filled with explosives, and whizzing missiles, resembling bullets and cannon balls; the noise was heard in Ottawa, and reports say, at a distance of 30 to 40 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Antartic Meterorite Newsletter Volume 9
    A. periodicAntarctical issued by the Meteorite Antarctic Meteorite NEWSLETTER Working Group to inform scientists of the basic characteristics of specimens recovered in the Antarctic. I Volume 9,Number 2 June 1986] Supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Polar Programs, and compiled at Code SN2, Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, Texas 77058 !!!f!!!! SAMPLE REQUEST DEADLINE: OCTOBER 20, 1986 (SEE PAGE 2)!!!!tt!! PAGE SAMPLE-REQUEST GUIDELINES ...................... 2 EDITOR'S OVERVIEW .......................... 3 NEW METEORITES ............................ 6 Table I: Newly Classified Pebbles from 1978 ........... 6 Table 2: Alphabetical List of New 1983-1985 Specimens ...... 7 Table 3: New 1983-1985 Specimens Listed By Type ......... 9 Table 4: Tentative Pairings with ALH83009 (Aubrite) ....... ii Table 5: Tentative Pairings with ALH83100/102 (C2 chondrites) . iI Table 6: Tentative Pairings with ALH84033 (C2 chondrite) .... ii Table 7: Newly processed specimens of ALH83100 (C2 chondrite) . 12 Table 8: Newly processed specimens of ALH83102 (C2 chondrite) 13 Petrographic Descriptions .................... 14 COMPREHENSIVE LISTS OF METEORITE PAIRINGS .............. 20 Table 9: Meteorite specimens that have been paired ....... 20 Table i0: Alphabetical list of paired meteorite specimens .... 24 ATTACHMENT: "Unique me_eori_es attract researchers," by Mo E. Lipschucz. Reprinted from Geotimes (November 1985), p. 8-10. SAMPLE-REQUEST GUIDELINES All sample requests should be made in writing to Secretary, MWG SN2/Planetary Materials Branch NASA/Johnson Space Center Houston, TX 77058 USA. Questions pertaining to sample requests can be directed in writing to the above address or can be directed by telephone to (713) 483-3274. Requests for samples are welcomed from research scientists of all countries, regardless of their current state of funding for meteorite studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the Roebling Medal of the Mineralogical Society Of
    American Mineralogist, Volume 79, pages 768-769, 1994 Presentationof the Roebling Medal of the Mineralogical Society of America for 1993 to Brian Mason Srumr Ross Tlvr,on ResearchSchool of Earth Sciences,Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra,A.C.T. 2601, Australia It is a great pleasure and privilege to introduce Dr. After the war, he returned to New Znalandas a lecturer Brian Mason as the recipient of the Roebling Medal of in the Geology Department at Canterbury University the Mineralogical Society of America. I first met Brian College,where I encounteredhim. It was difficult to dis- when he taught the first-year coursein mineralogy at what tinguish Brian from the students; to this day he retains was then Canterbury University Collegeofthe University both a youthful appearanceand manner. He still makes of New Zealand.Brian was a graduateof that department, arduous field trips to the west coast of the South Island and we shared a common mentor, Robin S. Allan, after of New Zealand,famous for its very high annual rainfall. whom the Allan Hills are named. He was an expert in He continues to publish many papers on local geological Tertiary brachiopods,and I don't think that he ever men- studies in New Znaland. tioned the words "geochemistry" or "meteorite" in his Brian taught mineralogy for a few years in New Zea- lectures.Nevertheless, both Brian and I were stimulated land before being tempted to the Department of Geology by the teaching of that remarkable man, a friend of the at Indiana University, where I becamehis Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre Haenecour Assistant Professor Lunar and Planetary Laboratory the University of Arizona 1629 E
    Pierre Haenecour Assistant Professor Lunar and Planetary Laboratory The University of Arizona 1629 E. University Blvd. Phone: (520)-626-9810 Tucson, AZ 85721-0092 Email: [email protected] RESEARCH & ACADEMIC INTERESTS Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry – stable isotopes; Ultrahigh-resolution ion- and electron- microscopy techniques; Origin and early history of the Earth and the Solar System; Circumstellar (presolar) grains and interstellar organic matter in primitive extraterrestrial materials; STEM education, scientific policy and public outreach. EDUCATION 2016 – PhD Degree, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis Thesis title: Presolar Grains in Primitive Astromaterials: Stellar Nucleosynthesis & Insights into Secondary Processes in the Early Solar System (PhD advisors: B. L. Jolliff and C. Floss) 2012 – M.A. Degree, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St Louis 2010 – B.A & M.A. Degree, Geology & Geochemistry, Free University of Brussels Master thesis title: Study of Pb and Zn isotopic fractionation and in situ trace element variations in terrestrial komatiitic lava flows from the Abitibi Greenstone Belt in Ontario, Canada. EMPLOYMENT AND WORK EXPERIENCE Oct 2019 – Present: Assistant Professor, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona Jan 2017 – Sept 2019: Postdoctoral Research Associate, The University of Arizona Collaborator on Earths in Other Solar Systems (EOS) team May – Dec 2016: Robert M. Walker Postdoctoral Fellow, Washington University in St. Louis Jan 2011 – May 2016: Doctoral Student (PhD), Washington University in St. Louis PROFESSIONAL AFFLIATIONS Meteoritical Society, Geochemical Society; American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS); National Postdoctoral Association. FELLOWSHIPS AND ACADEMIC AWARDS 2017 – Selected for the AAAS/Science Program for Excellence in Science 2017 – Meteoritical Society Early Career Scientist Award 2016 – The Brian Mason Award 2016 – Dean’s Recognition for Student Leadership at Washington University 2015 – Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • No, Mi a Ménkű Ez!?!
    Dénes Lajos No, mi a ménkű ez!?! Meteoritekről alapfokon. ISBN: 978-963-12-3838-9 Előszó Már gyerekkoromban is érdekelt a világűr, a csillagászat, a világ megismerésének a lehetősége. Később megpróbáltam távcsőtulajdonosból amatőr csillagásszá válni. A Polaris csillagvizsgáló rendszeresen szervez bemutatókat, szakköröket és ismeretterjesztő előadásokat. Itt tartott Kereszty Zsolt egy előadást a meteoritekről. Zsolt előadása nem a megszokott volt, nem a meteoritekről beszélt, hanem a szerelmeiről mesélt, áhítattal, szeretettel... és szakértelemmel. Másnap felhívtam vagy e-mailt küldtem neki már nem emlékszem, de valamit azonnal rám ragasztott ez biztos! Beszélgetéseink, levelezésünk napi szintűvé vált. Nagyon sokat tanultam tőle, rengeteg segítséget kaptam, hogy megismerhessem ezt a csodálatos világot, amit a meteoritek hoznak el nekünk a világűr mélyéből. Az olvasó tanulmányaim jegyzeteit olvashatja rendezett formában. Külön köszönetet szeretnék mondani azoknak akik anyagokkal, képekkel, tanácsaikkal, észrevételeikkel segítették azt, hogy ez a könyv elkészülhessen. Bakos Liza Bartha Lajos dr. Bérczi Szaniszló dr. Csizmadia Szilárd Kereszty Zsolt Köszönöm! Ráckeve, 2015. 10. 14. Dénes Lajos Naprendszer születik A Nap és a körülötte keringő égitestek kialakulása, a ma legelfogadottabb modell szerint, egy porból és gázokból álló felhő összehúzódásával kezdődött. A hidrogén és a hélium adott a mérések és a Nagy Bumm elmélet alapján, hiszen ez alkotja az Univerzum látható anyagának 99%-át.. Nyilván egy, a csillagászatban közelinek számító, szupernóva robbanása szolgáltatta a nehezebb elemeket, a szenet, a kőzetalkotó elemeket, pl. a szilíciumot, de a vasat vagy az uránt is. Az összehúzódást valószínűleg egy „közeli” csillag felrobbanása indította el, amely mint csillagszél elkezdte mozgatni a viszonylag homogén elrendezésű gáz és por elegyet. Ez a folyamat kb. 4,7 milliárd évvel ezelőtt kezdődött.
    [Show full text]
  • 64435 Revised Breccia with Glass Coat 1079 Grams
    64435 Revised Breccia with glass coat 1079 grams Figure 1: Photo of 64435. Cube is 1 cm. NASA S72-39674. Note the lack of any micrometeorite craters (see flip side, figure 2). Petrography Introduction The majority of 64435 is a fine-grained grey impact 64435 has a thick shiny black glass coat on one side melt that has not been described. It is found to be very (figure 1) and numerous micrometeorite pits on the aluminous in composition (Al2O3 = ~31%). Ryder and other (figure 2) as if it had once been an impact bomb Norman (1980) noted that the plagioclase microlites that had it glass coat eroded away on the unprotected in the matrix were often in alignment, as if by flow side. 64435 is an oriented lunar sample that has been (figure 3). James and Flohr (1985abs) and James et al. studied for cosmic ray induced activity. It contains (1989) studied a large (5x2x1 cm) coarse-grained white clasts of plutonic igneous rocks (ferroan anorthosite composite clast (CTA-A-FTA) made up of coarse clan) with “inverted” pigeonite. troctolitic anorthosite and fine troctolitic anorthosite (see below). Lunar Sample Compendium C Meyer 2009 Figure 2: Flip side of 64435 (see figure 1). NASA S72-39676. Cube is 1 cm. Note the abundant micrometeorite craters. Additional data can be found in notes by Brian Mason Anorthosite ,210A: Clast (,210A) is about 98% (unpublished), Kempa and James (1982abs), Lindstrom plagioclase (An ), 1% orthopyroxene (Wo En ) and (1984abs), James (1987abs) and the catalog by Ryder 98 2 56 1% augite (Wo44En39). Plagioclase is shocked (James and Norman (1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Meteoritical Society
    Meteoritical Society http://meteoriticalsociety.org 2013 ANNUAL MEETING INVITATION The 76th annual meeting of the Meteoritical Society will take place in Edmonton, the capital city of Alberta, Canada. The meeting will be held on July 29−August 2 at the Crowne Plaza Chateau Lacombe in Edmonton’s downtown core, within walking distance of the Arts District, shopping, nightlife, restaurants, and coffee shops. Edmonton is the most northerly major city in Canada. Long daylight hours and warm weather are therefore expected during the summer months. Situated on the North Saskatchewan River, Edmonton is close to UNESCO World Heritage Sites such as Jasper and Banff national parks in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump, and Dinosaur Provincial Park. Less than an hour from Edmonton is Anaïs Fourny, one of the two students sponsored by the Meteoritical Society to attend the workshop. PHOTO CREDIT: ALLAN TREIMAN Elk Island National Park. In addition to being an opportunity to observe bison, moose, and deer in a natural setting, this dark-sky preserve is also a prime viewing area for the aurora borealis, a light show we may fi eld study of a terrestrial analog for lunar crust formation. The be treated to as the next northern lights activity maximum is Meteoritical Society was a cosponsor, and supported attendance by two approached. The conference banquet will be held on Wednesday, July students, Corey Wall and Anaïs Fourny of the University of British 31, on the picturesque campus of the University of Alberta. Columbia. The workshop, held on July 12–16, 2012, was convened by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to Meteoritics & Planetary Science, Vol. 43, No. 10
    Supplement to Meteoritics & Planetary Science, vol. 43, no. 10 The Meteoritical Society Newsletter (October 2008) A report of the business carried out by the society over the past year, edited by Jeff Grossman, Secretary. FROM THE PRESIDENT special workshops on meteorites, development of a new membership initiative, etc. This fund is administered by the endowment President’s Editorial Joseph I. Goldstein committee of the Meteoritical Society and the funds are invested in a conservative manner. You will soon receive a brochure which It has been a pleasure to serve as your president and to work with discusses the endowment fund in more detail. so many of you to improve our society. I have a few months This year we received donations from Gordon McKay’s remaining of my presidency and I am in the process of filling colleagues and friends and a major gift from his wife, Linda Uljon, vacancies on our major committees, my last major task. I want to to set up a permanent endowment fund of over $25,000 to support a thank our officers, members of the council, and committee members Gordon A. McKay award for the best student presentation at a for their hard work. I continue to be impressed by the loyalty of our Meteoritical Society meeting. This addition to our endowment fund members and their willingness to help make our society stronger. will allow us to continuously support this award with a cash prize. Unfortunately, I cannot thank everyone who contributed over the last Special endowment funds such as this or individual gifts will two years for their efforts.
    [Show full text]