DOCSLIB.ORG

ELECTION in PERIL: PROCEDURAL RISKS to the 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 4 Candidate Won a Majority of the Electoral College, the Decision Would Be Made by the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ELECTION in PERIL: PROCEDURAL RISKS to the 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 4 Candidate Won a Majority of the Electoral College, the Decision Would Be Made by the U.S Election in Peril Procedural Risks to the 2020 Presidential Election July 2020 About MapLight MapLight is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) nonprofit that seeks to achieve a government that (actually) works for the people. We illuminate the influence of money in politics, facilitate informed voting and civic engagement, and advance reforms that make government more responsive to the people. Our database, online tools, research, and policy work help to expose and counter the hidden influences on our democracy. MapLight is based in Berkeley, California. Learn more about MapLight at https://maplight.org/. About the Authors Laura Curlin is the Data Director of MapLight, overseeing the organization’s research and data projects. Previously, she worked to pass a public campaign financing ballot measure in 2016 as treasurer of the Berkeley Fair Elections Coalition. Her previous experience also includes work on the Transparency in Political Spending Act as a member of Rhode Islanders for Fair Elections. Laura received a B.A. from Brown University with concentrations in Political Science and Middle East Studies. Bergen Smith is a Data Analyst at MapLight, analyzing campaign finance and other data for a variety of projects. He graduated from California State University, East Bay with a M.S. in Economics and from Whitworth University with a B.A in Philosophy. Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the following election experts for sharing their knowledge with us during in-depth interviews: Rosa Brooks, Edward Foley, Richard Pildes, Sam Issacharoff, Josh Douglas, Lisa Manheim, and Hugh Spitzer. We also recognize the contributions from other MapLight staff that made this project possible. We appreciate the work of Ann Ravel and Daniel G. Newman conducting interviews with election scholars. Thanks are also due to Chad Outler and Alyssa Bernardino for their research assistance. Tien Lu, Alec Saslow, and Frank Bass helped with editing the report. Finally, thanks to Heather Caviston for sharing her design skills with us. CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................4 Key Risks in 2020 .................................................................................................................5 Disenfranchised Mail Voters ...............................................................................................6 Public Pressure on Overtime Ballots ............................................................................... 7 Challenges in the Electoral College ............................................................................... 10 Federal Requirements ................................................................................................ 12 The Electoral College .........................................................................................................12 Ballot Dispute Resolution ................................................................................................. 14 “Faithless” Electors .............................................................................................................15 Swing State Profiles ........................................................................................................... 16 Arizona .......................................................................................................................................18 Colorado ...................................................................................................................................22 Florida .......................................................................................................................................25 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................... 30 Iowa ............................................................................................................................................35 Maine .........................................................................................................................................40 Michigan .................................................................................................................................. 44 Minnesota ................................................................................................................................ 49 Nebraska ...................................................................................................................................53 Nevada ......................................................................................................................................57 New Hampshire .......................................................................................................................61 North Carolina ....................................................................................................................... 65 Ohio ........................................................................................................................................... 70 Pennsylvania ...........................................................................................................................74 Texas...........................................................................................................................................78 Virginia ......................................................................................................................................82 Wisconsin ................................................................................................................................ 86 Executive Summary Public confidence in the integrity of our elections is crucial for the peaceful and democratic transfer of power. That confidence, however, is coming under siege from internal and external players, raising the specter of another election whose legitimacy is questioned. In addition to being held during a contentious and polarizing time, the 2020 presidential election will be subject to complex procedures not well known to the general public, and its integrity will be dependent upon leaders acting in good faith. While some states have taken steps to ensure that their citizens can vote safely in November, in others, politicians fighting over adaptations to the COVID-19 pandemic are already demonstrating that some officials will put the opportunity for a partisan victory over ensuring every citizen’s right to vote. Public education about election procedures and advocacy for policy improvements will be critical to ensuring the legitimacy of the 2020 election cycle. MapLight has uncovered multiple danger points for a general election that is being compared to the watershed 1860 contest for its potential to spawn more divisiveness and polarization. These potential trouble spots include: • The continued coronavirus pandemic, which many experts believe will worsen in the fall, has the potential to depress turnout by discouraging voters from visiting crowded polling places. Many states are taking a proactive approach by planning for increased mail ballots, which present a potentially unique set of challenges. • Already, President Trump (who, along with his wife, attorney general, daughter, and campaign manager, voted by mail during the 2018 midterms) has described voting by mail as an invitation to massive fraud.1 The president’s opposition makes it less likely that some Republican-controlled legislatures will act to ensure that all Americans can vote without fear. • Mail ballots may be delayed in an overwhelmed Postal Service, both in their distribution to voters and in their return to election officials. In many states, ballots that are not received by Election Day are rejected, and voters that do not receive their ballot in time would have to go to the polls in person to cast their vote. • Even absent fraud and political opposition, mail ballots will likely not be counted as quickly as votes cast at polling places. Delays could lead to false claims of victory by individual candidates, throwing the legitimacy of the election into further doubt. • A dispute over state election results could also throw the Electoral College into legal and political chaos if two sets of electoral votes from the competing parties are sent to Congress. A split would be possible in states such as North Carolina or Wisconsin, where government control is bitterly divided among separate branches. • Delays caused by a flood of mail ballots also could compromise the 2020 election. Electors must be named by December 8, six days before the Electoral College meets to officially name the winner of the contest. In the current political environment, however, it’s entirely possible that time-consuming legal challenges by losers could spur different states to take different approaches to naming electors, which then would also likely be subject to legal challenges. • Although it’s highly unlikely that a third-party candidate would siphon enough votes to prevent the Republican or Democratic nominee from obtaining more than 270 electoral votes, history has shown that it would be foolish to rely upon 2020 to follow a normal pattern of behavior. If neither 1Steib, M. (2020, June 22). Trump Staffers Who Voted By Mail, a Process He Calls ‘Rigged.’ New York Magazine. Retrieved from https://nymag.com/ intelligencer/2020/06/every-trump-ally-who-has-voted-by-mail-list.html ELECTION IN PERIL: PROCEDURAL RISKS TO THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure
    Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure as Critical Infrastructure Consistent with Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, the Secretary of Homeland Security has established Election Infrastructure as a critical infrastructure subsector within the Government Facilities Sector. Election infrastructure includes a diverse set of assets, systems, and networks critical to the administration of the election process. When we use the term “election infrastrucure,” we mean the key parts of the assets, systems, and networks most critical to the security and resilience of the election process, both physical locations and information and communication technology. Specficially, we mean at least the information, capabilities, physical assets, and technologies which enable the registration and validation of voters; the casting, transmission, tabulation, and reporting of votes; and the certification, auditing, and verification of elections. Components of election infrastructure include, but are not limited to: • Physical locations: o Storage facilities, which may be located on public or private property that may be used to store election and voting system infrastructure before Election Day. o Polling places (including early voting locations), which may be physically located on public or private property, and may face physical and cyber threats to their normal operations on Election Day. o Centralized vote tabulation locations, which are used by some states and localities to process absentee and Election Day voting materials. • Information
    [Show full text]
  • NASS White Paper on Business Identity Theft 2 Prevention and Protection in State Policy-Making Efforts
    Table of Contents Developing State Solutions to Business Identity Theft Assistance, Prevention, and Detection Efforts by Secretary of State Offices January 2012 Contents National Association of Secretaries of State 444 North Capitol St., NW – Suite 401 Washington, DC 20001 The National Association of Secretaries of State I 444 N. Capitol Street, NW I Suite 401 I Washington, DC NASS White Paper on Business Identity Theft 2 Prevention and Protection in State Policy-Making Efforts Introduction In October 2011, the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) held a national forum on business identity theft in Atlanta, Georgia, bringing together top advocates and experts from government and the private sector. The event was part of a NASS Business Identity Theft Task Force plan to develop proactive strategies for combating this relatively new type of crime. Secretaries of State and state business division directors attended the forum to learn how they could better protect the state-held information that offers a potential gateway to business identity theft. They wanted to discuss how they could work with law enforcement, financial institutions and business leaders in their state to educate all of the stakeholders about this type of crime. They were also interested in hearing about tools and technology that would aid in the detection and prevention of business identity theft, with best practices from private sector experts familiar with the issues. Some states were already aware of the increasing number of business identity fraud cases involving unauthorized changes to business records on file with Secretary of State offices. Georgia and Colorado had both spent considerable time and effort implementing comprehensive response and prevention measures, and these offices had plenty of substantive advice to share with their peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aow 2021 14 No Voter Fraud
    1. Mark your confusion. 2. Show evidence of a close reading. 3. Write a 1+ page reflection. The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud The president and his allies have baselessly claimed that rampant voter fraud stole victory from him. Officials contacted by The Times said that there were no irregularities that affected the outcome. Source: Nick Corasanti, Reid J. Epstein and Jim Rutenberg, New York Times, November 12, 2020 PHILADELPHIA — Election officials in dozens of states representing both political parties said that there was no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s portrait of a fraudulent election. Over the last several days, the president, members of his administration, congressional Republicans and right wing allies have put forth the false claim that the election was stolen from Mr. Trump and have refused to accept results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner. But top election officials across the country said in interviews and statements that the process had been a remarkable success despite record turnout and the complications of a dangerous pandemic. “There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.” “Kansas did not experience any widespread, systematic issues with voter fraud, intimidation, irregularities or voting problems,” a spokeswoman for Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas, said in an email Tuesday.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Merrill Secretary of State
    ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE October 2, 2020 Senator Mitch McConnell 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, DC 20510 Dear Majority Leader McConnell: Thank you for your swift action to hold hearings and to make certain that each Senator has the opportunity to consider the President’s nomination to fill the open seat on the Supreme Court of the United States. It is of utmost importance that the Supreme Court has a full nine-member court before Election Day on November 3, 2020. Maintaining the integrity and credibility of our elections is of paramount significance to each of us as our state’s respective chief election official. Americans must be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote with confidence, knowing their ballot will be counted for the candidate of their choice. In the case an election issue is challenged in court, America cannot afford a tie vote. We must be able to report election results in a timely, secure, and efficient manner as we have done before. The Honorable Amy Coney Barrett is an outstanding nominee for consideration for a vacancy on the Supreme Court of the United States. She brings with her an unblemished record and extensive experience as a litigator and distinguished professor of law at the University of Notre Dame. Her philosophy and tried and true beliefs of upholding the constitution and the laws of our nation as written make her an excellent choice for our nation’s highest court.
    [Show full text]
  • Legion News Summer 2020
    hio “For God & Country” LEGION NEWS Official Publication of The American Legion, Department of Ohio VOLUME 86, NO. 3 July | August | September 2020 2021 MIDWINTER CONFERENCE Department Executive Committee Meeting Saturday, June 27th, 10am • Small Gold #1 Pins: A Small Small District 8 @ 28.57% The 2021 Mid-Winter Conference will be held at the Crowne Plaza (Final Meeting) Gold Number One Pin will be Medium District 4 @ 69.23% Hotel North, 6500 Doubletree Avenue, Columbus, OH on the week- The Department Commander presented to each District 1st Vice Large District 10 @ 28% end of January 22-24th. The Legion, SAL and the Auxiliary are all Roger Friend convened the meet- Commander, who leads in their re- housed and have meetings in the same hotel. The Conference is fo- ing promptly at 10am. American spective categories at the time of a 2020 Department Membership cused on training and education of the American Legion and its pro- Legion Auxiliary President Kris- Department Executive Committee Recruiter of the Year – Is award- grams. Anyone is welcome to attend the Conference or any of the ten Little, and Sons of American meeting. (Retroactive for August, ed to the top new member recruiter meetings and classes offered. Closer to the event a schedule will be Legion Detachment Commander December, and April DEC Meet- of membership year as of May tar- available online. Bernie Kessler, brought American ings for 2019-2020) get date. To make reservations please call 614-885-1885 and select option Legion Family greetings. There August: • 1st Vice Commander #2 to receive the discounted group rate of $99.00 plus tax.
    [Show full text]
  • NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers
    NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers Introduced by Hon. Kyle Ardoin (R-LA) Co-Sponsored for Introduction by: Hon. Kevin Meyer (R-AK) Hon. John Merrill (R-AL) Hon. Jena Griswold (D-CO) Hon. Paul Pate (R-IA) Hon. Scott Schwab (R-KS) Hon. Michael Adams (R-KY) Hon. Jocelyn Benson (D-MI) Hon. Steve Simon (D-MN) Hon. Michael Watson (R-MS) Hon. Al Jaeger (R-ND) Hon. Maggie Toulouse Oliver (D-NM) Hon. Barbara Cegavske (R-NV) Hon. Shemia Fagan (D-OR) Hon. Kim Wyman (R-WA) WHEREAS, the 2020 election cycle was the most challenging in recent memory, with a global pandemic and multiple natural disasters affecting numerous states and their election infrastructure and processes; and WHEREAS, election workers across the country worked tirelessly under difficult conditions to ensure a fair, safe and accurate election for the more than 155 million voters in November; and WHEREAS, based upon unrelenting misinformation and disinformation from both domestic and foreign sources, extremists have taken to threatening and endangering election workers, from Secretaries of State, state election directors, local election officials and election workers; and WHEREAS, the cornerstone of our republic is the right of Americans to vote in a safe, secure and accurate election, and their exercising of that right; and WHEREAS, election workers are a vital part of ensuring the exercise of that right for all eligible Americans; and WHEREAS, violence and violent threats directed at Secretaries of State, their families, staff, and other election workers is abhorrent and the antithesis of what our nation stands for.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Merrill Secretary of State
    ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE February 22, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 322 Hart S.O.B. 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader of the House House of Representatives House of Representatives 1236 Longworth H.O.B. 2468 Rayburn H.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Majority Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and House Minority Leader McCarthy: We are writing you today to urge you to reject the “For the People Act” otherwise known as H.R. 1 or S. 1, which is a dangerous overreach by the federal government into the administration of elections. Each state legislature should have the freedom and flexibility to determine practices that best meet the needs of their respective states. A one-size-fits-all approach mandated by Congress is not the solution to any of our problems. These bills intrude upon our constitutional rights, and further sacrifice the security and integrity of the elections process. We firmly believe the authority to legislate and regulate these changes should be left with the states. H.R. 1 and S. 1 blatantly undermine the extensive work we, as election officials, have completed in order to provide safe, accessible voting options for our constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic
    Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic October 29, 2020 Abstract: With approximately 8 0 million Americans projected to vote by mail in November, parties have turned to the courts to clarify the appropriate ways to adapt, apply, and administer the rules of mail voting for pandemic elections. P laintis across the country have led more than 200 cases and appeals challenging nearly every aspect of the absentee balloting process, asserting claims under a variety of state and federal laws. This report outlines the many legal challenges to absentee and mail voting systems brought since March, largely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Authors: Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan, Zahavah Levine, Aviel Menter, Christopher Meyer, Alexander Perry, and Theodora Raymond-Sidel HealthyElections.org: Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Part I: Application and Eligibility to Vote By Mail 7 Applying to Vote by Mail 8 Absentee Balloting Without an Excuse 9 Fear of Contracting COVID-19 as an Excuse 11 Age Limits 14 Ensuring Receipt of Mail-In Ballots 15 Part II: Submission of Mail-In Ballots 16 Ballot Receipt Deadlines 16 Ballot Secrecy Sleeve Requirements 24 Cost of Postage for Mailing Ballots 25 Failure to Provide Accommodations for Voters with Disabilities 27 Part II Conclusion 28 Part III: Challenges Seeking to Expand Delivery Options 30 Bans on Absentee Voter Assistance 31 Limits on Absentee Ballot Drop-O Locations 33 USPS Operational Changes 35 Part III Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate List Grouped by Contest Alamance Board of Elections Alamance
    ALAMANCE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE LIST GROUPED BY CONTEST CRITERIA: Election: 11/03/2020, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y, County: ALL COUNTIES, Data Source: FULL COUNTY VIEW CANDIDATE NAME NAME ON BALLOT PARTY FILING DATE ADDRESS ALAMANCE US PRESIDENT TRUMP, DONALD J Donald J. Trump REP 08/14/2020 BIDEN, JOSEPH R Joseph R. Biden DEM 08/14/2020 BLANKENSHIP, DON Don Blankenship CST 08/14/2020 HAWKINS, HOWIE Howie Hawkins GRE 08/14/2020 JORGENSEN, JO Jo Jorgensen LIB 08/14/2020 US SENATE TILLIS, THOMAS ROLAND Thom Tillis REP 12/09/2019 P. O. BOX 97396 RALEIGH, NC 27624 BRAY, SHANNON WILSON Shannon W. Bray LIB 12/11/2019 215 MYSTIC PINE PL APEX, NC 27539 CUNNINGHAM, JAMES CALVIN III Cal Cunningham DEM 12/03/2019 PO BOX 309 RALEIGH, NC 27602 HAYES, KEVIN EUGENE Kevin E. Hayes CST 12/19/2019 416 S WEST CENTER ST FAISON, NC 28341 US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 13 BUDD, THEODORE PAUL Ted Budd REP 12/03/2019 PO BOX 97127 RALEIGH, NC 27624 HUFFMAN, JEFFREY SCOTT Scott Huffman DEM 12/20/2019 4311 SCHOOL HOUSE COMMONS HARRISBURG, NC 28075 NC GOVERNOR PISANO, ALBERT LAWRENCE Al Pisano CST 12/19/2019 7209 E.W.T. HARRIS BLVD. STE. J 119 CHARLOTTE, NC 28227 COOPER, ROY ASBERRY III Roy Cooper DEM 12/05/2019 434 FAYETTEVILLE ST RALEIGH, NC 27601 STE 2020 DIFIORE, STEVEN JOSEPH II Steven J. DiFiore LIB 12/20/2019 6817 FISHERS FARM LN UNIT C1 CHARLOTTE, NC 28277 FOREST, DANIEL JAMES Dan Forest REP 12/04/2019 PO BOX 471845 CHARLOTTE, NC 28247 CONT_CAND_rpt_3.rpt Page 1 of 545 Sep 02, 2020 3:52 pm ALAMANCE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE LIST GROUPED BY CONTEST CANDIDATE NAME NAME ON BALLOT PARTY FILING DATE ADDRESS ALAMANCE NC LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ROBINSON, MARK KEITH Mark Robinson REP 12/02/2019 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • How Sports Help to Elect Presidents, Run Campaigns and Promote Wars."
    Abstract: Daniel Matamala In this thesis for his Master of Arts in Journalism from Columbia University, Chilean journalist Daniel Matamala explores the relationship between sports and politics, looking at what voters' favorite sports can tell us about their political leanings and how "POWER GAMES: How this can be and is used to great eect in election campaigns. He nds that -unlike soccer in Europe or Latin America which cuts across all social barriers- sports in the sports help to elect United States can be divided into "red" and "blue". During wartime or when a nation is under attack, sports can also be a powerful weapon Presidents, run campaigns for fuelling the patriotism that binds a nation together. And it can change the course of history. and promote wars." In a key part of his thesis, Matamala describes how a small investment in a struggling baseball team helped propel George W. Bush -then also with a struggling career- to the presidency of the United States. Politics and sports are, in other words, closely entwined, and often very powerfully so. Submitted in partial fulllment of the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism Copyright Daniel Matamala, 2012 DANIEL MATAMALA "POWER GAMES: How sports help to elect Presidents, run campaigns and promote wars." Submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism Copyright Daniel Matamala, 2012 Published by Columbia Global Centers | Latin America (Santiago) Santiago de Chile, August 2014 POWER GAMES: HOW SPORTS HELP TO ELECT PRESIDENTS, RUN CAMPAIGNS AND PROMOTE WARS INDEX INTRODUCTION. PLAYING POLITICS 3 CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • School Email Issue Spills Over Into Council Meeting by MIKE WILLIAMS Riod of Tuesday’S Meeting
    Distributed FREE On Fridays For 12 Years July 9, 2021 www.pcpatriot.com Locally Owned And Operated Insuring You & Yours School email issue spills over into council meeting By MIKE WILLIAMS riod of Tuesday’s meeting. Radcliffe said he could get his The Patriot Radcliffe said comments made copy of the letter and council in the emails by Siers were, members could support it if they The ongoing local ruckus over “Comments everyone here should chose. comments made in several emails have taken offense to.” “I am supporting the Board of from Pulaski County School Su- He said he supports the state- Supervisors, my great sheriff and perintendent Dr. Kevin Siers to ments made last week by the great sheriff’s office,” he said. Karen Tuggle Brad Alley Lynn White state Department of Education of- Pulaski County Board of Super- “May I ask a question Jamie,” ficials spilled over into Tuesday’s visors in response to Siers’ com- asked Councilman Michael Reis. meeting of Pulaski Town Council. ments. “What exactly did he (Siers) Home • Auto • Life • Business The comments were discovered He called on his representative say that was wrong and insulted recently through a Freedom of In- on the school board, Becki Cox of the sheriff’s office,” Reis asked. formation Act request and were the Massie District, to “pull that “He personally called out the made public via local media and microphone down and take care sheriff in his comment,” Rad- social media pages and at public of that problem.” cliffe replied. meetings of the School Board. Radcliffe promised he would be “In what comment,” Reis Some of Siers’ comments were going to school board meetings asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105
    Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_103 rev1 page 103 part iii Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_104 rev1 page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_105 rev1 page 105 chapter five The Neoconservative Journey Jacob Heilbrunn The Neoconservative Conspiracy The longer the United States struggles to impose order in postwar Iraq, the harsher indictments of the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy are becoming. “Acquiring additional burdens by engag- ing in new wars of liberation is the last thing the United States needs,” declared one Bush critic in Foreign Affairs. “The principal problem is the mistaken belief that democracy is a talisman for all the world’s ills, and that the United States has a responsibility to promote dem- ocratic government wherever in the world it is lacking.”1 Does this sound like a Democratic pundit bashing Bush for par- tisan gain? Quite the contrary. The swipe came from Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and copublisher of National Interest. Simes is not alone in calling on the administration to reclaim the party’s pre-Reagan heritage—to abandon the moralistic, Wilsonian, neoconservative dream of exporting democracy and return to a more limited and realistic foreign policy that avoids the pitfalls of Iraq. 1. Dimitri K. Simes, “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs (Novem- ber/December 2003): 97, 100. Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_106 rev1 page 106 106 jacob heilbrunn In fact, critics on the Left and Right are remarkably united in their assessment of the administration. Both believe a neoconservative cabal has hijacked the administration’s foreign policy and has now overplayed its hand.
    [Show full text]