DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2006.15333V4 [Hep-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2006.15333V4 [Hep-Ph] Excitation Functions of Tsallis-like Parameters in High-Energy Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions 1 1, 2, Li-Li Li , Fu-Hu Liu ∗ and Khusniddin K. Olimov ∗ 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics & Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics & State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China; shanxi [email protected] (L.L.L.) 2 Laboratory of High Energy Physics, Physical-Technical Institute of SPA “Physics-Sun” of Uzbek Academy of Sciences, b Chingiz Aytmatov str. 2 , 100084 Tashkent, Uzbekistan ∗ Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] (F.H.L.); [email protected] (K.K.O.) Abstract: The transverse momentum spectra of charged pions, kaons, and protons produced at mid-rapidity in central nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions at high energies are analyzed by considering particles to be created from two participant partons which are assumed to be contributors from the collision system. Each participant (contributor) parton is assumed to contribute to the transverse momentum by a Tsallis-like function. The contributions of the two participant partons are regarded as the two components of transverse momentum of the identified particle. The experimental data measured in high-energy AA collisions by international collaborations are studied. The excitation functions of kinetic freeze-out temperature and transverse flow velocity are extracted. The two param- eters increase quickly from 3 to 10 GeV (exactly from 2.7 to 7.7 GeV) and then slowly at above 10 GeV with ≈ ≈ the increase of collision energy. In particular, there is a plateau from near 10 GeV to 200 GeV in the excitation function of kinetic freeze-out temperature. Keywords: Excitation functions of related parameters, participant parton, kinetic freeze-out temperature, transverse flow velocity PACS: 12.40.Ee, 13.85.Hd, 24.10.Pa 1 Introduction freeze-out, a phase transition from QGP to hadrons oc- curred in the system, so the composition and ratio of High-energy collider experiments are designed to study various particles remain unchanged. In the stage of ki- the strongly interacting matter at high temperatures netic freeze-out, elastic collisions among particles stop, and densities [1]. The deconfinement of colliding so their pT and then mT spectra are unchanged [8, 10]. hadrons into quark-gluon plasma (QGP), which then Therefore, by studying the pT (mT ) spectra, we can ob- rapidly expands and cools down [2], is conjectured to be tain some useful information, such as the effective tem- created at such extreme collision energies [3, 4, 5, 6]. In perature (T ), the chemical freeze-out temperature (Tch), high energy and nuclear physics, the study of transverse and the kinetic freeze-out temperature (T0 or Tkin) of arXiv:2006.15333v4 [hep-ph] 18 Apr 2021 [momentum (pT ) or mass (mT )] spectra of charged par- the system, as well as the transverse flow velocity (βT ) of ticles produced in nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions is very the final state particles. The temperature in which we do important. In particular, the AA collision process at the not exclude the contribution of transverse flow is called Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the Large the effective temperature which is related to the kinetic Hadron Collider (LHC) provides a good opportunity to freeze-out temperature. The temperatures in the stages study the signals and characteristics of QGP generation, of chemical and kinetic freeze-outs are called the chem- so as to indirectly study the system evolution and the ical and kinetic freeze-out temperatures respectively. reaction mechanism of particle generation. It is very important to study the behavior of T0 and During the time evolution of collision system [7, 8, 9], βT due to their relation to map the phase diagram of the stages of kinetic freeze-out and chemical freeze-out Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), though Tch is usu- are two important processes. In the stage of chemical ally used [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] in the phase diagram. 1 In order to extract T0 and βT , and study their depen- The formalism and method are shortly described in Sec- dence on energy, we can analyze the pT (mT ) spectra tion 2. Results and discussion are given in Section 3. of particles using different models. These models in- In Section 4, we summarize our main observations and clude, but are not limited to, the blast-wave model with conclusions. Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics [17, 18] or Tsallis statis- tics [19, 20, 21], as well as other alternative meth- ods [22, 23, 24, 25, 26] based on the standard distribu- 2 Formalism and method tion or Tsallis distribution. Here, the standard distribu- tion denotes together the Boltzmann, Fermi-Dirac, and The Tsallis distribution has different forms or revi- Bose-Einstein distributions. The alternative method re- sions [44, 45, 46, 47], we have the Tsallis-like distribution gards the intercept of T versus m0 as T0, and the slope of pT at mid-y to be of pT versus m as βT , where m0, pT , and m denote h i h i 2 1/(q 1) the rest mass, mean p , and mean energy of the given d N dN (q 1)(mT µ m0) − − T mT 1+ − − − , particles, respectively. dydpT ∝ dy T (1) In our recent work [27, 28], the blast-wave model with Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics or Tsallis statistics and where N denotes the number of particles, the standard distribution have been used to analyze 2 2 mT = pT + m0 (2) the spectra of particles produced in high-energy proton- q proton (pp) and AA collisions. The related parameters can be obtained using pT , were extracted and their excitation functions were ob- 1 q =1+ (3) tained. Not only the blast-wave model [17, 18, 19, 20, 21] n but also the alternative method [22, 23, 24, 25, 26] can is an entropy index that characterizes the degree of equi- be used to extract T0 and βT , though an effective tem- librium or non-equilibrium, n is a parameter related to perature T is used in the latter. The alternative method q, and µ is the chemical potential. In particular, in is partly a new one, in which the extractions of both T0 the expression of m µ m , m is simplified from T − − 0 T and βT are based on T [22, 23, 29] and the related de- m cosh y because cosh y 1 at mid-y. T ≈ rived quantities such as p and m. We have the probability density function of p at h T i T mid-y to be Due to the importance of T0 and βT and their excita- 1/(q 1) tion functions, we use a new method in the framework of 1 dN (q 1)(mT µ m0) − − mT 1+ − − − . multisource thermal model [30] to describe the pT (mT ) N dpT ∝ T spectra of identified particles in this work. Considering (4) the contributions of two participant (contributor) par- Empirically, to fit the spectra of p at mid-y in this tons to p of a given particle, we regard the two con- T T work, Eq. (4) can be revised as tributions as the two components of pT . The pT (mT ) 1/(q 1) spectra of identified particles (concretely charged pions, (q 1)(m µ m ) − − f(p ,T )= Cma0 1+ − T − − 0 , kaons, and protons) produced at mid-rapidity (mid-y) T T T in central AA collisions which include gold-gold (Au- (5) Au) collisions at the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron where C is the normalization constant, a0 is a new non- (AGS), lead-lead (Pb-Pb) collisions at the Super Pro- dimensional parameter that describes the bending de- ton Synchrotron (SPS), Au-Au collisions at the RHIC, gree of the distribution in low-p region (p = 0 1 T T ∼ and Pb-Pb and xenon-xenon (Xe-Xe) collisions at the GeV/c), which is introduced artificially and tested in our LHC are studied. The center-of-mass energy per nu- a0 recent work [48, 49], and mT is revised from mT due to cleon pair, √sNN , considered by us is from 2.7 GeV the introduction of the revised index a0. Because of the to 5.44 TeV. After fitting the experimental data mea- limitation of the normalization, changing the bending sured by the E866 [31], E895 [32, 33], E802 [34, 35], degree in low-pT region will change the slope in high-pT NA49 [36, 37], STAR [38, 39, 40], and ALICE Collabo- a0 region. Although writing CmT in Eq. (5) is not ideal, rations [41, 42, 43], we analyze the tendency of param- as it yields a fractional power unit in C, we have no eters. suitable method to scale out the unit by e.g. m0 due to The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. the nonlinear relationship between mT and m0 shown in 2 Eq. (2). In Eq. (5), the other parameters such as q and where f1,2(pt1,pt2,T ) denotes the united probability a0 do not appear in the function name for the purpose density function of pt1 and pt2. Further, we have the of convenience. In this work, we call Eq. (5) the revised probability density function of pT to be Tsallis-like function. 2π In the framework of the multisource thermal fpT (pT ,T )= fpT ,φ(pT ,φ,T )dφ Z0 model [30], we assume that two participant partons take 2π part in the collisions. Let pt1 and pt2 denote the com- = pT f1(pT cos φ, T )f2(pT sin φ, T )dφ. ponents contributed by the first and second participant Z0 (9) parton to pT respectively, where pt1 (pt2) is less than the transverse momentum of the participant parton.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hagedorn's Hadron Mass Spectrum and the Onset of Deconfinement
    Hagedorn’s Hadron Mass Spectrum and the Onset of Deconfinement∗ Marek Gazdzicki´ and Mark I. Gorenstein Abstract A brief history of the observation of the onset of deconfinement - the beginning of the creation of quark gluon plasma in nucleus-nucleus collisions with increasing collision energy - is presented. It starts with the measurement of hadron mass spectrum and the Hagedorn’s hypothesis of the limiting temperature of hadronic matter (the Hagedorn temperature). Then the conjecture that the Hage- dorn temperature is the phase transition temperature was formulated with the crucial Hagedorn participation. It was confirmed by the observation of the onset of decon- finement in lead-lead collisions at the CERN SPS energies. 1 Hadron Mass Spectrum and the Hagedorn Temperature A history of multi-particle production started with discoveries of hadrons, first in cosmic-ray experiments and soon after in experiments using beams of particles produced in accelerators. Naturally, the first hadrons, discovered in collisions of cosmic-ray particles, were the lightest ones, pion, kaon and L. With the rapid ad- vent of particle accelerators new particles were uncovered almost day-by-day. There are about 1000 hadronic states known so far. Their density in mass r(m) increases approximately exponentially as predicted by the Hagedorn’s Statistical Bootstrap Model [1] formulated in 1965: r(m) = const m−a exp(bm) : (1) In the case of point-like hadron states this leads to a single-particle partition func- tion: p ! V Z ¥ Z ¥ k2 + m2 Z(T;V) = dm k2dk exp − r(m) ; (2) arXiv:1502.07684v1 [nucl-th] 26 Feb 2015 2 2p mp 0 T Marek: Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany; and Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland Mark: Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev, Ukraine; and Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt, Germany ∗Chapter in: R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last 20 Years at the CERN SPS
    Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 3507{3516 (2020) c The Author(s) 2020 THE EUROPEAN https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-000090-9 PHYSICAL JOURNAL SPECIAL TOPICS Review Phase diagram of strongly interacting matter: the last 20 years at the CERN SPS Marek Gazdzickia Geothe-University Frankfurt am Main, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany Jan Kochanowski University, PL-25406 Kielce, Poland Received 16 May 2020 / Accepted 30 October 2020 Published online 21 December 2020 Abstract. Twenty years ago, on February 10, 2000, the CERN Director General Luciano Maiani announced: The combined data coming from the seven experiments on CERN's Heavy Ion programme have given a clear picture of a new state of matter. This result verifies an important prediction of the present theory of fundamental forces between quarks. This report briefly reviews studies of the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter with relativistic nuclear collisions at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron which followed the CERN's press release on the quark-gluon plasma discovery. An attempt to formulate priori- ties for future measurements at the CERN SPS closes the paper. The report is dedicated to David Blaschke who celebrated his 60th birth- day in 2019. David's contribution to the studies presented here was very significant. 1 Introduction The report is organized along Karl Popper's view of scientific method: PS1 ! TT 1 ! EE1 ! PS2 :::; (1) where PS1 is an initial problem situation, TT 1 and EE1 stand for tentative theories and error elimination, respectively, and PS2 is a resulting new problem situation. The problem situation emerged after the quark-gluon plasma discovery at the CERN SPS is presented in Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton-Proton Interactions and Onset of Deconfinement
    Proton-proton interactions and onset of deconfinement A. Aduszkiewicz15, E.V. Andronov21, T. Antici´ c´ 3, V. Babkin19, M. Baszczyk13, S. Bhosale10, A. Blondel23, M. Bogomilov2, A. Brandin20, A. Bravar23, W. Brylinski´ 17, J. Brzychczyk12, M. Buryakov19, O. Busygina18, A. Bzdak13, H. Cherif6, M. Cirkovi´ c´ 22, M. Csanad 7, J. Cybowska17, T. Czopowicz17, A. Damyanova23, N. Davis10, M. Deliyergiyev9, M. Deveaux6, A. Dmitriev 19, W. Dominik15, P. Dorosz13, J. Dumarchez4, R. Engel5, G.A. Feofilov21, L. Fields24, Z. Fodor7;16, A. Garibov1, M. Ga´zdzicki6;9, O. Golosov20, M. Golubeva18, K. Grebieszkow17, F. Guber18, A. Haesler23, S.N. Igolkin21, S. Ilieva2, A. Ivashkin18, S.R. Johnson25, K. Kadija3, E. Kaptur14, N. Kargin20, E. Kashirin20, M. Kiełbowicz10, V.A. Kireyeu19, V. Klochkov6, V.I. Kolesnikov19, D. Kolev2, A. Korzenev23, V.N. Kovalenko21, K. Kowalik11, S. Kowalski14, M. Koziel6, A. Krasnoperov19, W. Kucewicz13, M. Kuich15, A. Kurepin18, D. Larsen12, A. László7, T.V. Lazareva21, M. Lewicki16, K. Łojek12, B. Łysakowski14, V.V. Lyubushkin19, M. Mackowiak-Pawłowska´ 17, Z. Majka12, B. Maksiak11, A.I. Malakhov19, D. Manic´ 22, A. Marchionni24, A. Marcinek10, A.D. Marino25, K. Marton7, H.-J. Mathes5, T. Matulewicz15, V. Matveev19, G.L. Melkumov19, A.O. Merzlaya12, B. Messerly26, Ł. Mik13, S. Morozov18;20, S. Mrówczynski´ 9, Y. Nagai25, M. Naskr˛et16, V. Ozvenchuk10, V. Paolone26, M. Pavin4;3, O. Petukhov18, R. Płaneta12, P. Podlaski15, B.A. Popov19;4, B. Porfy7, M. Posiadała-Zezula15, D.S. Prokhorova21, D. Pszczel11, S. Puławski14, J. Puzovic´ 22, M. Ravonel23, R. Renfordt6, E. Richter-W˛as12, D. Röhrich8, E. Rondio11, M. Roth5, B.T.
    [Show full text]
  • INDICATIONS for the ONSET of DECONFINEMENT in Pb + Pb COLLISIONS at the CERN SPS from NA49∗ P
    Vol. 36 (2005) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 2 INDICATIONS FOR THE ONSET OF DECONFINEMENT IN Pb + Pb COLLISIONS AT THE CERN SPS FROM NA49∗ P. Seyboth for the NA49 Collaboration Max–Planck–Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany C. Alti, T. Anticicu, B. Baatarh, D. Barnad, J. Bartkef , L. Betevi,j H. Białkowskas, C. Blumei, B. Boimskas, M. Botjea, J. Bracinikc, R. Brammi R. Brunj, P. Bunčići,j, V. Cernyc, P. Christakogloub, O. Chvalao J.G. Cramerq, P. Csatód, N. Darmenovr, A. Dimitrovr, P. Dinkelakeri V. Eckardtn, G. Farantatosb, D. Flierli, Z. Fodord, P. Fokag, P. Freundn V. Frieseg, J. Gáld, M. Gaździckii,l, G. Georgopoulosb, E. Gładyszf K. Grebieszkowt, S. Hegyid, C. Höhneg, K. Kadijau, A. Karevn M. Kliemanti, S. Kniegei, V.I. Kolesnikovh, T. Kolleggeri, E. Kornasf R. Korusl, M. Kowalskif , I. Krausg, M. Krepsc, M. van Leeuwena, P. Lévaid L. Litovr, B. Lungwitzi, M. Makarievr, A.I. Malakhovh, C. Markertg M. Mateevr, B.W. Mayesk, G.L. Melkumovh, C. Meureri, A. Mischkeg M. Mitrovskii, J. Molnárd, St. Mrówczyńskil, G. Pállad, A.D. Panagiotoub D. Panayotovr, A. Petridisb, M. Piknac, L. Pinskyk, F. Pühlhoferm R. Renfordti, A. Richardi, C. Rolande, G. Rolande, M. Rybczyńskil A. Rybickif,j, A. Sandovalg, H. Sanng, N. Schmitzn, P. Seybothn, F. Siklérd B. Sitarc, E. Skrzypczakt, G. Stefanekl, R. Stocki, H. Ströbelei, T. Susau I. Szentpéteryd, J. Sziklaid, T.A. Trainorq, D. Vargad, M. Vassilioub G.I. Veresd,e, G. Vesztergombid, D. Vranićg, A. Wetzleri, Z. Włodarczykl I.K. Yoop, J. Zaraneki, and J. Zimányid aNIKHEF, Amsterdam, Netherlands bDepartment
    [Show full text]
  • Energetic Scans of Marek Gaździcki
    Energetic Scans of Marek Gazdzicki Peter Seyboth Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce and Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik, Munich P. Seyboth CPOD 2016, Wroclaw, 30/5-4/6/2016 1 Interest in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions since work on PhD thesis: (Warsaw University, DUBNA 1980 – 1985) Search for enhanced strangeness production as indicator of hadron deconfinement Thesis subject: Nucleus-nucleus interactions at 4.5A GeV in the SKM200 streamer chamber experiment at the DUBNA Synchrophasotron Reactions C+C, C+Ne, C+Cu, C+Zr, C+Pb, O+Ne, O+Pb - 0 → π , K s , Λ Result: No statistically significant “unusual” 0 enhancement of Λ and K production P. Seyboth CPOD 2016, Wroclaw, 30/5-4/6/2016 2 NA35 streamer chamber experiment at the CERN SPS 1986 – 1989 Heidelberg and Frankfurt University 1989 – 1992 Warsaw Institute of Experimental Physics 1992 – present Frankfurt and Kielce Universities O+ (Au, Ag, Cu) reactions at 60A and 200A GeV (1986) S + (Au, Ag, S) reactions at 200A GeV (1987, 1990) O + Au S+ Au P. Seyboth CPOD 2016, Wroclaw, 30/5-4/6/2016 3 First indication of enhancement of strangeness in final states of S+S, S+Ag reactions compared to p+A collisions Strangeness suppression factor (Wroblewski): Suppression decreases from N+N to S+A: 0.17 → 0.35 Measure of total strangeness production (at SPS energies) ≈ ES increases from N+N to S+A: 0.1 → 0.17 SQM1994 Kolymbari P. Seyboth CPOD 2016, Wroclaw, 30/5-4/6/2016 4 NA49 time projection chamber experiment at the CERN SPS Pb beam from 1994 - 2002 central Pb+Pb collisions at 158A GeV thin horizontal slice (TPCs detect ≈600 charged particles) - clear strangeness enhancement - fluctuations compatible with mostly statistical origin - no unique signal of deconfinement → energy scan for onset of deconfinement signal P.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Phase Diagram of QCD Matter at RHIC
    Studying the Phase Diagram of QCD Matter at RHIC A STAR white paper summarizing the current understanding and describing future plans 01 June 2014 CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Review of BES-I Results and Theory Status 5 2.1 Region of the Phase Diagram Accessed in BES-I . 5 2.2 Search for the Critical Point . 8 2.3 Search for the First-order Phase Transition . 10 2.3.1 Directed Flow (v1) ........................... 10 2.3.2 Average Transverse Mass . 12 2.4 Search for the Threshold of QGP Formation . 13 2.4.1 Elliptic Flow . 13 2.4.2 Nuclear Modification Factor . 18 2.4.3 Dynamical Charge Correlations . 21 2.4.4 Chiral Transition and Dileptons . 24 2.5 Summary of BES-I . 27 3 Proposal for BES Phase-II 30 3.1 Physics Objectives and Specific Observables . 30 3.1.1 RCP of identified hadrons up to pT = 5 GeV/c . 32 3.1.2 The v2 of f mesons and NCQ scaling for indentified particles . 33 3.1.3 Three-particle correlators related to CME/LPV . 34 3.1.4 The centrality dependence of the slope of v1(y) around midrapidity . 36 3.1.5 Proton-pair correlations . 38 3.1.6 Improved ks2 for net-protons . 40 3.1.7 Dilepton production . 41 3.2 Beam request . 43 3.3 The Fixed-Target Program . 45 3.4 The Importance of p+p and p+A Systems . 45 3.5 Collider Performance . 47 3.6 Detector Upgrades . 47 3.6.1 iTPC .................................. 48 3.6.2 EPD ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • NA61/SHINE Experiment - Programme Beyond 2020∗
    Article NA61/SHINE experiment - programme beyond 2020∗ Ludwik Turko for the NA61/SHINE Collaboration Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wroclaw, pl. M. Borna 9, 50-205 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] Received: date; Accepted: date; Published: date Abstract: The fixed-target NA61/SHINE experiment (SPS CERN) looks for the critical point (CR) of strongly interacting matter and the properties of the onset of deconfinement. It is a scan of measurements of particle spectra and fluctuations in proton-proton, proton-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus interactions as a function of collision energy and system size, corresponding to a two dimensional phase diagram (T-mB). New measurements and their objectives, related to the third stage of the experiment after 2020 are presented and discussed here. Keywords: QCD matter; phase transition; critical point 1. Introduction The NA61/SHINE, Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) Heavy Ion and Neutrino Experiment) is the continuation and extension of the NA49 [1,2] measurements of hadron and nuclear fragment production properties in fixed-target reactions induced by hadron and ion beams. It has used a similar experimental fixed-target setup as NA49 (Figure1) but with an extended research programme. Beyond an enhanced strong interactions programme there are the measurements of hadron-production for neutrino and cosmic ray experiments realized [3]. NA61/SHINE is the collaboration with about 150 physicists, 30 institutions and 14 countries being involved. The strong interaction programme of NA61/SHINE is devoted to study the onset of deconfinement and search for the CR of hadronic matter, related to the phase transition between hadron gas (HG) and quark-gluon plasma (QGP).
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 1
    Vol. 35 (2004) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 1 OBSERVATION OF DECONFINEMENT PHASE TRANSITION IN NUCLEUS–NUCLEUS COLLISIONS ∗ Marek Gaździcki Institut für Kernphysik, University of Frankfurt August Euler Str. 6, D–60486 Frankfurt, Germany and Świętokrzyska Academy, Kielce, Poland (Received November 18, 2003) The main results obtained within the energy scan program at the CERN SPS are presented. The anomalies in energy dependence of hadron produc- tion indicate that the onset of deconfinement phase transition is located at about 30 A GeV. For the first time we seem to have clear evidence for the existence of a deconfined state of matter in nature. PACS numbers: 24.85.+p In the mid 1990s a study of results from experiments at CERN (with a collision energy in the centre of mass of the nucleon–nucleon pair of √sNN = 20 GeV) and the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) at BNL (maximum energy √sNN 5.5 GeV) indicated [1, 2] intriguing changes in the energy dependence of≈ hadron production between top AGS and CERN SPS energies. Within a statistical model of the early stage of the collision process [3] these changes can be attributed to the onset of the deconfinement phase transition, i.e. creation of a new state of matter in which quarks and gluons are no longer confined with hadrons [4]. The model predicted a sharp maximum in the multiplicity ratio of strange hadrons (hadrons which con- tain strange s and anti-strange s quarks) to pions (the lightest hadron) at the beginning of the transition region, at about √sNN 7.5 GeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Results from the NA61/SHINE Strong Interaction Physics Programme
    EPJ Web of Conferences 137, 07001 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/201713707001 XIIth Quark Confinement & the Hadron Spectrum Recent results from the NA61/SHINE strong interaction physics programme Evgeny Andronov1;a, for the NA61/SHINE Collaboration 1Saint Petersburg State University, ul. Ulyanovskaya 1, 198504, Petrodvorets, Saint Petersburg, Russia Abstract. The main physics goals of the NA61/SHINE programme on strong interactions are the study of the properties of the onset of deconfinement and the search for signatures of the critical point of strongly interacting matter. For this purpose a scan of the two dimensional phase diagram (T-µB) is being performed at the SPS by measurements of hadron production in nucleus-nucleus collisions as a function of collision energy and system size. This contribution presents intriguing results on the energy dependence of hadron spec- tra and yields in inelastic p+p and centrality selected Be+Be and Ar+Sc collisions. In particular, the energy dependence of the signals of deconfinement, the "horn", "step" and "kink", and new results on fluctuations and correlations are shown and compared with the corresponding data of other experiments and model predictions. 1 Introduction NA61/SHINE [1] is a fixed target experiment at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). The layout of the NA61/SHINE detector is sketched in Fig. 1. It consists of a large acceptance hadron spectrometer with excellent capabilities in charged par- ticle momentum measurements and identification by a set of five Time Projection Chambers as well as Time-of-Flight detectors. The geometrical layout of the TPCs allows particle detection down to pT = 0 GeV/c in a broad interval of the forward rapidity semisphere, which is practically impossible at collider experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Probing Dense QCD Matter in the Laboratory – the CBM Experiment at FAIR
    Probing dense QCD matter in the laboratory – The CBM experiment at FAIR P. Senger1,2 for the CBM Collaboration 1 Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany 2 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The “Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research” (FAIR) in Darmstadt will provide unique research opportunities for the investigation of fundamental open questions related to nuclear physics and astrophysics, including the exploration of QCD matter under extreme conditions, which governs the structure and dynamics of cosmic objects and phenomena like neutron stars, supernova explosions, and neutron star mergers. The physics program of the Compressed Baryonic Matter (CBM) experiment is devoted to the production and investigation of dense nuclear matter, with a focus on the high-density equation-of-state (EOS), and signatures for new phases of dense QCD matter. According to the present schedule, the CBM experiment will receive the first beams from the FAIR accelerators in 2025. This article reviews promising observables, outlines the CBM detector system, and presents results of physics performance studies. 1. The future Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) The Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) will be the accelerator-based flagship research facility in Europe for the coming decades. FAIR will open up unprecedented research opportunities in nuclear and hadron physics including nuclear astrophysics, in atomic and plasma physics, and in applied research such as material science and radiation biophysics [1]. The layout of FAIR is shown in Figure 1. The synchrotron SIS100 will provide high-intensity primary beams like protons up to kinetic energies of 29 GeV, and nuclei with energies up to 15A GeV.
    [Show full text]
  • TALKS PRESENTED April 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010
    TALKS PRESENTED April 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010 The U. S. Nuclear Physics Program, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia (June 2009). Nuclear Astrophysics Underground, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, International Union of Pure and Applied Physics Working Group 9 Meeting, Bonn, Germany (August, 2009). The U. S. Nuclear Physics/Nuclear Astrophysics Program into the Next Decade, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, Public Lecture as part of the European Nuclear Astrophysics Summer School, Cantania, Italy (September 2009). Science and Technology to Strengthen National, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, 10th Anniversary Symposium for the Korea Research Council on Fundamental Science and Technology, Seoul, south Korea (October 2009). Development of New Techniques to Determine Neutron Induced Reaction Rates, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, 2010 Stewardship Science Academic Alliances Symposium, Washington, D.C. (January 2010). Recent Results on Astrophysical Reaction Rates, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, Niidata2010, Niigata, Japan (March 2010). Astrophysical Reaction Rates by Indirect Techniques, R.E. Tribble, Invited Talk, Osaka, Japan (March 2010). th The Status of Vud, J.C. Hardy, Invited Talk, 10 Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics, CIPANP 2009, La Jolla, California (May 2009). Superallowed Nuclear β Decay: Symmetry Breaking, CVC and CKM Unitarity, J.C. Hardy, Invited Talk, 4th International Symposium on Symmetries in Subatomic Physics, Taipei, Taiwan (June 2009). Testing CVC and CKM Unitarity via Superallowed Nuclear Beta Decay, J.C. Hardy, Invited Talk, WE- Heraeus-Seminar on “Precision experiments at lowest energies for fundamental tests and constants,” Bad Honnef, Germany (June 2009). Superallowed Nuclear β Decay: Precision Measurements for Basic Physics, J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Transverse Activity of Kaons and Deconfinement Phase Transition In
    Physics Letters B 567 (2003) 175–178 www.elsevier.com/locate/npe Transverse activity of kaons and deconfinement phase transition in nucleus–nucleus collisions M.I. Gorenstein a,b,M.Ga´zdzicki c,d,K.A.Bugaeva,e a Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev, Ukraine b Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Frankfurt, Germany c Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Frankfurt, Germany d Swi¸´ etokrzyska Academy, Kielce, Poland e Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Darmstadt, Germany Received 16 June 2003; accepted 24 June 2003 Editor: L. Montanet Abstract We found that the experimental results on transverse mass spectrum of kaons produced in central Pb+Pb (Au+Au) collisions show an anomalous dependence on the colliding energy. The inverse slope of the spectrum increases with the energy in the low (AGS) and high (RHIC) energy domains, whereas it remains constant in the intermediate (SPS) energy range. We argue that this anomaly is probably caused by the modification of the equation of state in the transition region between confined and deconfined matter. This observation may be considered as a new signal, in addition to the previously reported anomalies in the pion and strangeness production, of the onset of deconfinement located in the low SPS energy domain. 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. The statistical model of the early stage, SMES, of 30 A GeV. The present data show a maximum of the nucleus–nucleus (A + A) collisions suggests [1] that strangeness to pion ratio at this energy. An exact posi- the onset of deconfinement phase transition at the early tion and the detailed structure of this maximum will be stage of the collisions may be signaled by the anom- clarified by the expected soon new results on Pb + Pb alous energy dependence of several hadronic observ- collisions at 20 A GeV.
    [Show full text]