No. W-11039/1/2020-JJM-III-DDWS Government of Ministry of Jal Shakti Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation (DDWS) National Jal Jeevan Mission (NJJM)

Subject: Record of discussions on Annual Action Plan (2020-21) of Rajasthan to achieve 100% FHTCs under Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) – regarding

A meeting to consider Annual Action Plan (AAP) for the planning and implementation of Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) in Rajasthan in 2020-21 was held on 20 May, 2020 at 10:00 AM through VC. List of participants is at Annex–I. 2. Additional Secretary & Mission Director, NJJM extended a warm welcome to the Secretary, DWS; Rajasthan team and other participants. 3. The Additional Secretary & Mission Director, NJJM detailed the salient aspects of Jal Jeevan Mission and the ongoing exercise to finalize the AAP. Giving an overview of the Mission, he mentioned about the expectations from the State Government. Setting the agenda for the discussion, he emphasized to take full advantage of existing piped water supply systems in villages by taking up retrofitting/ augmentation to provide Functional Household Tap Connections (FHTCs) to remaining households so as the village become 100% ‘Har Ghar Jal Gaon’ i.e. 100% FHTCs village. This is the low-hanging fruit, which has been emphasized since August, 2019 and will yield tangible outcomes with least investment in very little time. He stressed on the principle of ‘equity and inclusiveness’, which needs to be followed to ensure that the SCs/ STs, marginalized and weaker sections of the society get access to potable water through FHTCs without any discrimination especially when there is PWS scheme in the village. Moreover, as already stipulated in JJM guidelines, retrofitting/ augmentation measures for all completed/ ongoing PWS scheme is required to be taken up on priority in first two years and completed by March, 2021. 4. He mentioned that as per interim order passed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), the State Government has to ensure piped water supply to all households in all Arsenic/ Fluoride affected habitations/ villages latest by December, 2020. In such habitations where people are not getting safe water through piped connections, as an interim measure, provision for water supply @ 8 – 10 lpcd should be made for cooking and drinking purpose by installing Community Water Purification Plants. Similarly, emphasis to be given on providing FHTCs in other priority areas viz. aspirational districts, SC/ ST dominated villages, water scarce areas, SAGY villages, PVTG habitations, and quality-affected areas. 5. AS & Mission Director also mentioned that the is supporting States in every possible manner and JJM is a great opportunity for the State to ensure supply of safe drinking water to each and every rural household. This opportunity should not be frittered away. He regretted that even after 8 months of launching of such a life changing Mission for rural people especially poor, SCs, STs and marginalized people especially women and girls, no significant progress in providing FHTCs in the State has been observed despite several meetings and visits to Rajasthan State. In villages where piped Page 1 of 18 water system is in place, tap connections is not given at all. Even all the basic institutional mechanism is still not in place in the State and not a single VAP has been prepared during the 2019-20. He emphasized early constitution of User Committees i.e. Pani Samiti’s or Village Water & Sanitation Committee and its role in planning, implementation, management, operation and maintenance of in-village infrastructure and preparation of Village Action Plan (VAP) for the same. It was highlighted that the community should be engaged for surveillance of water quality in villages including in Aanganwadi, schools, etc. while PHED to monitor the quality of water supplied. Engaging a multi-disciplinary team in the form of PMU at the State as well as well as district level is an absolute necessity for rigorous planning, analysis, project implementation, concurrent monitoring, etc. 6. He underlined the importance of proper planning and commensurate expenditure management for better fund utilization. Considering the huge unspent balance as on 01.04.2020, AS & Mission Director asked the Principal Secretary, PHED, Government of Rajasthan to review the financial progress and make a monthly output plan in terms of number of FHTCs and commensurate expenditure plan for prudent financial management and smooth implementation of the Mission in the State. It was informed that there is a need for holistic planning at the lowest level i.e. village/ GP, for source strengthening, water harvesting, aquifer recharge, water treatment, grey water management, water security, O&M etc., for which dovetailing of resources from MGNREGS, 15th FC Grants for PRIs, SBM, DMDF, CSR funds, Local Area Development funds, etc. should be done. It was advised that community should be encouraged to get involved, so that they must plan, manage, implement, operate and maintain the village water supply scheme/ system meant for them. This decentralized, demand-driven and community-managed approach will lead to long- term sustainability of the water supply sources and system including assured water services delivery. Drinking water infrastructure development should be perceived as an approach for attaining service delivery. He then requested the State to make a presentation on their AAP 2020-21. 7. Principal Secretary, PHED, Government of Rajasthan made the presentation on State’s proposed AAP for 2020-21 covering various planned activities and funds required for the same. He presented the plan for providing FHTCs to 10,43,792 households, which is 29.85% of annual target of 34,96,563 households with cumulative target of 22.5% in 2020-21, 37.2% in 2021-22, 64.94 in 2022-23 and 100% by 2023-24. He also proposed to provide 9,67,992 FHTCs through retrofitting and augmentation of existing infrastructure at a cost of Rs. 62,757 per household connection. In Priority area planning, it was proposed 4.91% of balanced FHTCs in Aspirational district, 16.53% of balanced FHTCs in SAGY villages, 8.22% of balanced FHTCs in DPAP/ DDP blocks and 11.52% in SC/ ST dominated villages. The salient features of the AAP and observations of Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation on the individual components are enclosed at Annex–II. 8. Detailed discussion were held on the FHTCs coverage proposed for the year and over the mission period; priorities to be assigned for saturation approach; priority area planning; support activities; water quality monitoring and surveillance; institutional preparedness to implement the mission in the State; financial planning; and operation and maintenance of both existing and new assets to be created.

Page 2 of 18

9. Representative of Ministry of Rural Development urged the State for effective utilization of MGNREGS funds for strengthening of drinking water sources to achieve water security. Similarly, officer from Ministry of Panchayati Raj informed about the 15th FC Grants for PRIs allocation for the State of Rajasthan for the purpose of water and sanitation, which could be used for achieving the goal of JJM. 10. In addition, following comments were also made on AAP for 2020-21 submitted by State. The state was requested to revise the AAP plan and upload on the IMIS of the department in 10 days for final consideration and approval; i.) out of the total 1,21,526 habitations in the State, around 48,000 habitations have some type of PWS scheme and in these habitations, there are 61 lakh households. Out of these 61 lakh households, only 12 lakh households i.e. about 20% have household tap connections. The principle of ‘equity and inclusiveness’ must be followed while reviewing all the villages to identify wherein retrofitting/ augmentation of existing schemes can be taken up for FHTC saturation in villages without any further delay; ii.) State has proposed only 10.43 lakh households with tap connections in 2020-21 i.e. 11.73% of the remaining households against the target of 34.96 lakh households (40% of remaining households). State has proposed 100% FHTC Coverage of all households by 2023-24 out of which 11.7% in 2020-21, 16.86% in 2021-22, 31.5% in 2022-23 and 40% during 2023-24. The FHTC coverage may be evenly planned and all low hanging fruits i.e. retrofitting and augmentation of all existing PWS schemes should be taken up for providing FHTCs and completed this year. The village–wise analysis of PWS schemes is at Annex-III; iii.) priority must be given on retrofitting/ augmentation of completed/ ongoing PWS schemes to provide FHTCs and saturate the whole village and no household should be left out. At least one to two districts may be identified and prioritized for 100% FHTCs coverage in 2020-21; iv.) under priority area planning, provision for 4.91% of balanced FHTCs in Aspirational district, 16.53% of balanced FHTCs in SAGY villages, 8.22% of balanced FHTCs in DPAP/ DDP blocks and 11.52% in SC/ ST dominated villages is very low and requires revision for coverage of maximum possible households in these areas especially in villages with PWS system ; v.) as reported by State in IMIS, total population belongs to SC and ST category is 18.52% and 16.88%, respectively. It is inferred that at least around 36% of total fund needs to be utilized for FHTC provisions to SC/ ST households, while implementing rural water supply schemes to provide FHTCs in villages/ habitations. But as stated above, State has planned only for 11.52% of the balanced FHTCs in SC/ ST villages, which leaves a large chunk of earmarked fund for SC/ST, unutilized. In view of this, AAP need to be looked into very carefully and revised; vi.) State needs to plan for all Fluoride-affected habitations including those which are not taken up under NWQSM. As per IMIS there exists 3,265 of Fluoride-affected habitations out of which 1,602 habitations have CWPPs. AAP (2020-21) of the State Page 3 of 18

may also include plan for remaining 1,663 Fluoride-affected habitations for providing potable water through FHTC or @ 8-10 lpcd through CWPP as purely an interim measure by 31.12.2020; vii.) need to explore the possibility of covering maximum possible households in quality- affected habitations other than Fluoride-affected during FY 2020-21; viii.) plan for preparation of VAP of only 5,000 villages out of total 43,364 villages in the State during 2020-21 is highly inadequate. It is unfortunate that last year this work was not taken up. It needs to be revised by taking VAP preparation work in at least around 30,000 villages in this year itself for achieving the JJM objective. As the VAP preparation activity for different villages can be taken up separately and simultaneously, this target is achievable; ix.) State needs to plan for incurring expenditure of at least 90% of the outstanding balance (OB) i.e. Rs. 605.87 crore for drawing the allocated fund under JJM for FY 2020-21; x.) State needs to plan for utilizing unspent balance of Rs. 389.20 crore under NWQSM. As already stipulated, all approved works under NWQSM needs to be completed by December, 2020 and incurring of expenditure under NWQSM will be allowed till 31 March, 2021. xi.) with tentative central share allocation of around Rs. 2,522.03 crore under JJM coverage component during 2020-21. State need to make provision for matching share for JJM coverage component, NWQSM funds including OB. The financial progress of state is at Annex-IV. Recent upward revision in borrowing limit of States Government from 3.5 to 5% will be of great help to State to provide the state matching share under JJM; xii.) April 1st, 2020 onwards, PFMS is mandatory to be used and all the transactions under JJM need to be taken up through Single Nodal Account. All other accounts to be closed and all money along with interest lying in different accounts to be transferred to this Single Nodal account and State report full compliance within 20 days, before release of funds in 2020-21; xiii.) One ISA may take up around 50-60 villages for VAP preparation at one go under JJM. Therefore, State need to engage more ISAs in every district for covering maximum number of such villages, wherein ISA involvement required for preparing VAPs; xiv.) amount proposed for State level expert (one) under HRD activities is Rs. 3.25 Lakh/ per person/ month, is not accepted. This needs to be re-examined; xv.) fund proposed to be taken up for strengthening MIS infrastructure may also be used to implement sensor-based systems for monitoring water supply in terms of quantity, quality and frequency, to see the functionality of water supply schemes; xvi.) conferences and workshops may not be possible this year because of ongoing COVID-19 situation. In view of this, State may revise the plan and quantum of fund allocated for the same and these programmes should be conducted online

Page 4 of 18

platforms. In fact, such videos should be prepared and online courses should be started; xvii.) as stipulated in JJM guidelines, every source needs to be tested once for chemical parameters and twice for bacteriological contamination (pre and post monsoon) in a year as a part of water quality monitoring. State needs to revise action plan for testing of all water sources accordingly. It may also be planned for opening water quality laboratory facilities to general public. xviii.) For water quality surveillance activities, PHE department is duty bound to empower and engage with the community. For this, action plan needs to incorporate the entire value-chain- from timely procurement of kits, supply of kits to the community, identification of at least five women in every village, training women for FTK use and reporting and collating the reports with laboratory-based findings of the water sources. xix.) as it is required to upgrade and to obtain NABL accreditation of all the laboratories in the State, it may be explored to plan for obtaining NABL accreditation for maximum possible number of laboratories during 2020-21. All the new laboratories proposed, needs to be set-up complying with NABL standard. xx.) as to implement works at speed and scale, it is required to plan for institutional arrangements in AAP by taking steps for preparation of standard designs, draw up estimates and initiate the process of large-scale rate contracting along with the selection process of third-party inspection agencies for quality control; xxi.) State may focus on GP or its sub-committee or community’s role in O&M for long- term sustainability and explore possibility of using low-energy technologies. Concerted efforts to be made to enable GPs or its sub-committees to recover water delivery service charges to promote responsibility and accountability, for sustainable water supply systems; xxii.) MGNREGA funds to be converged for strengthening of local drinking water sources with specific objective of achieving drinking water security; xxiii.) Finance Commission Grants to PRIs in 2020-21 to be dovetailed on water and sanitation, preferably for drinking water source sustainability and in-village water supply infrastructure. SBM-G funds should be used for grey water treatment and reuse. Other sources of funds viz. SBM, DMDF, LAD, CSR funds, CAMPA funds, etc. to be explored for convergence; and xxiv.) in the prevailing CoVid-19 pandemic situation, works related to water supply and water conservation should commence immediately in all villages so as to provide works to the skilled/ semi-skilled migrant workers for their livelihood as well as for fulfilment of the objective of Jal Jeevan Mission. xxv.) State to set up public grievance redressal system with 24X7 call centre with a dedicated toll free number along with provision of registering grievances on phone, using social media, digital mode, etc.

Page 5 of 18

xxvi.) Regional water supply schemes, bulk water transfer and treatment plants, etc. which are required to be taken as a part of JJM to cover all households with FHTCs, should be planned without any further delay. All such schemes are required to be approved by SLSSC and SWSM before 31.3.2021 so as are completed by March, 2024. Wherever required, fund mobilization should be taken up and State share should be provided. With GoI raising borrowing limits of States from 3.5% to 5% of GDP, State will be able to provide matching grant. xxvii.) State Government to ensure monthly fund flow and matching state share provision in the budget 2020-21. No parking of fund is allowed under the JJM. Principal Secretary, PHED must ensure that fund released by the GoI is transferred immediately to Single Nodal account along with matching State share. xxviii.) Physical and financial progress to be reported on daily basis as it is online both IIMS. All payments/ transactions to take place through PFMS, both for Central and State share. From 1.4.2020, it has become absolutely mandatory. There has to be a single nodal account and all other must be closed and funds are transferred to this single account in 20 days without fail. 11. In his concluding remarks, Secretary, DDWS urged the Principal Secretary, PHED and his team to intensively review the village-wise PWS situation and accordingly revise the AAP by taking up retrofitting and augmentation work along with giving tap connections to every household in all PWS villages. This must be treated as top most priority under JJM and scope for such work is provided in AAP appraisal (Annex – II). 12. The meeting ended with vote of thanks to the Chair and all participants. ****

Page 6 of 18

Annex - I

List of Participants

Government of India 1. Shri. Parameswaran Iyer, Secretary, D/o Drinking Water and Sanitation, GoI 2. Shri. Bharat Lal, Addl. Secretary & Mission Director, NJJM 3. Smt. Seemantinee Sengupta, DDG, NIC 4. Smt. Roopa Mishra, Director (JJM-III) 5. Shri. Ajay Kumar, Director (Water Quality) 6. Shri. Manoj Kumar Sahoo, Deputy Secretary (JJM-II) 7. Smt. Renjitha M. H., Deputy Secretary (JJM-I) 8. Shri. R.P. Shukla, Deputy Secretary (Finance) 9. Shri. D. Rajashekhar, Deputy Adviser (PHE) 10. Shri. A. Murlidharan, Deputy Adviser (PHE) 11. Shri. Santosh R., Assistant Adviser (PHE) 12. Shri Deep Shekhar Singhal, Under Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development, GoI 13. Shri Kiran Padhy, Program Officer, Ministry of Rural Development, GoI

Government of Rajasthan

1. Shri Rajesh Yadav, Principal Secretary, PHED & GWD 2. Shri C.M. Chauhan, Chief Engineer (Special Projects), PHED 3. Shri R.K. Meena, Chief Engineer(Rural), PHED 4. Shri Amitabh Sharma, Director, WSSO, PHED 5. Shri Dinesh Goel, Chief Engineer(Tech), PHED 6. Shri Rakesh Kumar Mathur, Chief Chemist, PHED

Page 7 of 18

Annex - II Jal Jeevan Mission

Appraisal of Annual Action Plan for FY 20-21 Rajasthan

1. General

State has planned to have 100 % FHTC by 2023-24 out of which 11.7% in 2020-21, 16.86% in 2021-22, 31.5% in 2022-23 and 40% during 2023-24.

2. Planning for FHTC coverage (Figure in lakh) Total number of No. of Households with FHTC No. of remaining Households Households 101.32 12.36 (12.20%) 88.96 (87.80%)

FHTCs Coverage Plan Already FHTC Coverage plan S. Details Total provided No. 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 (01.04.20) No of HHs with i.) 101,32,274 12,36,007 10,43,792 15,00,000 28,00,000 35,52,475 FHTC Cumulative % of ii.) 12.20% 22.50% 37.30 % 64.93 % 100 % HH coverage No. of villages to iii.) be provided with 43,364 77 700 4,000 13,000 25,587 100% FHTCs No. of GPs to be iv.) provided with 11,325 9 100 950 3,000 7,266 100% FHTCs No of Blocks to be v.) provided with 352 0 0 0 95 257 100% FHTCs No. of districts to v.) be provided with 33 0 0 0 0 33 100% FHTCs

Observations: i.) State is planning 100% FHTC Coverage of all households by 2023-24 out of which 11.7% in 2020-21, 16.86% in 2021-22, 31.5% in 2022-23 and 40% during 2023-24. ii.) State is proposing to provide 10.43 lakh households with tap connections in 2020-21 i.e 11.73 % of the remaining households against the target of 34.96 lakh household (40% of Page 8 of 18

remaining households) iii.) State is not planning 100% coverage of even a single district before 2023-24, not even a single block before 2022-23.

3. Planning for low hanging fruits - coverage in villages having PWS

i) Coverage through Augmentation & Retrofitting in 2020-21 Type of No. of No. of Proposed Fund Cost per household scheme scheme Villages FHTCs required connection (Rs. crore) (Rs.) SVS 2,569 2,599 6,19,640 1,202.67 19,409 MVS 168 1,606 3,22,558 2,388.64 74,053 Total 2,737 4,205 9,42,198 3,591.31 38,116

ii) Source strengthening in 2020-21 Type of scheme No. of No. of borewell Fund required Cost per scheme recharge structures (Rs. in Cr.) scheme (Rs.)

SVS 600 600 12 2,00,000 Solar energy- - - - - based Total 600 600 12 2,00,000 iii.) Details of proposed FHTCs

S. No. Type of scheme Proposed FHTC during 2020-21 1. Retrofitting and Augmentation of existing PWS 9,42,198 2. New Schemes taken up during 2019-20 25,794 3. Externally aided project 75,800 Total 10,43,792

Observations: i.) State is proposing all 9.42 lakh FHTCs through retrofitting/ augmentation of existing schemes with average cost of Rs. 38,116 per household connection. ii.) State is planning retrofitting and augmentation schemes in 4205 villages for providing FHTCs but 100% FHTC coverage is only for 700 villages during 2020-21.

4. Priority Area Planning i.) Water Quality-affected Habitations Total Quality Habitations planned Habitations planned to % age of affected Affected to be covered with be covered with CWPP habitations planned with habitations FHTC potable drinking water 14,669 800 1,620 16.49%

Page 9 of 18

ii) Status of Fluoride affected habitations under NWQSM Total no. of No. of No. of habitations No. of habitations No. of habitations habitations covered with state being covered in habitations yet under NWQSM covered plan/ where quality ongoing schemes to be planned improved 6,849 3,880 1,117 1,407 445

Coverage plan for Fluoride affected habitations under NWQSM Coverage plan FY 20-21 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 No. of Fluoride affected habitations 0 30 90 120 240

FHTC to be provided 0 2,100 6,000 9,900 18,000

iv) Coverage plan for Fluoride affected habitations other than NWQSM Coverage plan FY 20-21 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 No. of Fluoride affected habitations 0 10 30 40 80

FHTC to be provided 0 700 2,000 3,300 6,000

ii.) Priority areas (Aspirational Districts/ SAGY Villages/ DPAP/DDP blocks/ SC/ST dominated villages) Aspirational SAGY villages DPAP/ DDP SC/ ST District (5) blocks Dominated areas Total Planned Total Planned Total Planned Total Planned

No of 4,000 210 (5.25 200 30 13,912 1,000 12,940 700 (5.40 Villages %) (15 %) (7.18%) %)

8,28,373 40,693 42,323 7,000 31,60,680 2, 60, 000 22,55,075 2, 60,000 FHTCs (4.91 %) (16.53%) (8.22%) (11.52%)

Observations: i.) State has done planning for providing potable drinking water to 16.49% of affected habitations during 2020-21. ii.) State has 3,747 Fluoride affected habitations and done planning for providing potable water to only 2,420 affected habitations (this may include other than fluoride affected habitations). State has not planned to cover all fluoride affected habitations (short term or long term) in 2020-21. iii.) State has done planning for FHTCs in 320 fluoride affected habitation in 2020-21. Out of which, 240 habitations are earmarked under NWQSM and 80 habitations are other than NWQSM. iv.) State has done planning for providing 4.91% of balanced FHTCs in Aspirational district, 16.53% of balanced FHTCs in SAGY villages, 8.22% of balanced FHTCs in DPAP/ DDP blocks and 11.52% in SC/ST dominated villages.

Page 10 of 18

5. Plan for Support Activities:

(Amount in Rs. lakh) Activity Amount proposed Remark Engagement of ISAs 10.00 33 ISA proposed for 18,368 non PWS villages. State has proposed one ISA for 557 villages (as per Format 1 ISA for 40- 60 villages). IEC Activities 2,713.04 Intensive IEC plan. HRD activities 501.79 9 number of persons at State level and 50 number of persons at district level. Amount proposed for State level expert is Rs.3.25 Lakh/per person/ month, which is very high. Capacity building of PRIs 827.10 Plan for Skilling activities 417.650 17,000 person to be trained Mobilization of local community 3,620.00 Amount proposed for preparation of one VAP is Rs. 67,900, which is very high. Third party inspection 100.00 - Public grievance redressal system 100.00 - Documentation 79.25 - Setting up knowledge centre 275.00 - Organizing workshop 383.00 - Innovations - Sensor based 60.00 - monitoring MIS Infrastructure 954.50 State is planning MIS infrastructure for Rs 9.54 crore Social Audits 50.00 - Maintenance of hardware/ IT 70.00 - software Development of Hydro –geo- 50.00 - morphological maps Material testing labs 100.00 - Total Rs.103,11.33 (GoI: 61,86.80 lakh, State: 41,24.53 lakh) Observations: i.) State has planned for almost every important activity. ii.) Number of ISAs proposed is less. iii.) Amount proposed for State level expert is Rs.3.25 Lakh/ per person/ month, which is very high and not acceptable. iv.) Amount proposed for preparation of one VAP is Rs. 67,900, which is very high.

6. Plan for WQMS Activities: i.) Planning: NABL Accreditation:

Page 11 of 18

Total Number Already NABL NABL Accreditation Setting up of of Labs Accredited planned new lab 218 6 27 (12.38%) 187 (at Block level) Water Quality Monitoring: Total number of No of sources No of sources No of delivery Drinking water to be tested for to be tested for points to be Sources chemical bacteriological tested contamination contamination 13,02,843 4,23,000 5,82,000 69,975

Water Quality Surveillance: Sanitary inspection: Total number of drinking No. of source sanitary Total no. of water sources surveys planned sanitary survey planned 13,02,843 10,43,857 10,43,857

Surveillance using FTKs: No. of No. of School/ No of FTKs No. of test No. of FTKs villages anganwadis planned at planned at planned to GP level School/ be anganwadis purchased 43, 277 (*) 1,39,843 9,92,657 1,39,843 11,325 * Total villages shown above are 43,364 ii.) Financial: (Amount in Rs. Lakh) Activity Amount proposed Remark Setting up/ up-gradation/ 6,937.98 operationalisation of laboratories FTKs procurement 479.81 Laboratory in PPP mode 0.00 IEC activities 464.44 Training and capacity building 349.26 8,231.49 Total: ( GoI – 4,938.89 lakh, State- 3,292.60 lakh) Observations: i.) State has planned for almost every activity. ii.) State has planned for NABL Accreditation 27 Labs (12.28%) and setting up of 187 nos of block level labs. iii.) State has not planned for any PPP mode lab.

7. Planning for Institutional arrangements: Constitution of APEX Committee Done. Constitution of SWSM executive Done Committee Appointment of Mission director Yet to be done Constitution and Strengthening of DWSM Yet to be done

Page 12 of 18

Constitution and strengthening of VWSC/ Yet to be done Paani Samiti Details of SPMU/ DPMU other staff Yet to be done

8. Implementation arrangements: State is yet to finalize implementation arrangements. 9. O&M Arrangements: Annual O&M Requirements: Rs. 1,757.57 Crore (Amount in Rs in crore) Energy Cost Maintenance cost Chemical cost Payment of O&M staff 824.00 270.47 5.5 657.59

Staff cost is 243% of the maintenance cost.

10. Overall Financial Planning: i) JJM planning: Tentative Fund Allocation under JJM (Central) = 2,522.03 Crore (Amount in Rs. crore) Components Total Coverage Support WQM&S NWQSM Opening 605.87 0 0 389.2 995.07 Balance as on 01.04.2020 Tentative Central 2410.76 126.1/61.86 50.44/49.38 0 2,522.03 share allocation State matching 3016.63 41.24 32.99 389.2 3480.06 share Total available 6033.26 103.1 82.31 778.4 6997.06 fund Proposed plan 3755.28 103.11 82.31 886.57 4,827.27 (62.24%) (49%) (97.8%) (100.00%) (68.98%)

Community contribution: 94.6 crore ii) Other than JJM Planning

Externally aided project: Rajasthan Rural Water Supply & Fluorosis Mitigation Project Nagaur ID -P-226- Fund provision for the year 2020-21: Rs. 250 Crore.

State share (other than matching state share): NIL

Convergence planning: NIL Source of Source Water Grey water Others Cattle funds Strengthening Harvesting Management trough/ washing / bathing places SBM(G) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MGNREGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15th Finance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commission Others 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 13 of 18

Final Comments: 1. State is planning 100% FHTC Coverage of all households by 2023-24 out of which 11.7% in 2020-21, 16.86% in 2021-22, 31.5% in 2022-23 and 40% during 2023-24. 2. State is proposing to provide 10.43 lakh households with tap connections in 2020-21 i.e. 11.73 % of the remaining households against the target of 34.96 lakh household (40% of remaining households) 3. State is not planning 100% coverage of even a single district before 2023-24, not even a single block before 2022-23. 4. State has done an overall planning for Rs. 4,827.27 crore (68.98%), which is less than total available fund of Rs. 6997.06 crore, as per tentative allocation of Rs. 2,522.03 crore & opening balance of Rs. 605.87 crore under coverage and 289.20 crore under NWQSM. 5. State has done planning for providing 4.91% of balanced FHTCs in Aspirational district, 16.53% of balanced FHTCs in SAGY villages, 8.22% of balanced FHTCs in DPAP/ DDP blocks and 11.52% in SC/ST dominated villages. 6. State is planning retrofitting and augmentation schemes in 4205 villages for providing FHTCs but 100% FHTC coverage is only for 700 villages during 2020-21. 7. State has done planning for providing potable drinking water to 16.49% of affected habitations during 2020-21. 8. State has 3,747 Fluoride affected habitations and done planning for providing potable water to only 2,420 affected habitations (this may include other than fluoride affected habitations). State has not planned to cover all fluoride affected habitations (short term or long term) in 2020-21. 9. State has not done any planning for convergence activities. 10. State must plan for incurring an expenditure (central) of about Rs. 500.69 Crore to get first installment in FY 2020-21. 11. State has O&M expenditure of Rs. 17,57.57 Crore out of which Rs. 824 crore as energy cost, Rs. 275.97 crore towards maintenance, expenditure on chemicals, etc. and Rs. 657.59 crore for payments of O&M staff. 12. State is requested revisit the cost proposed for State level experts & VAP preparation under support component. 13. State has planned for NABL Accreditation 27 Labs (12.28%) and setting up of 187 of block level labs. state may also explore the possibility for establishment of lab in PPP mode. State may also explore possibilities for engaging labs from engineering college /poly technique etc, 14. State to take necessary action for institutional and implementation arrangements, etc.

15. Service charge recovery needs to be planned for long-term sector sustainability.

****

Page 14 of 18

Analysis of existing PWS scheme & scope for FHTC by retrofitting & augmentation

1. Analysis of PWS schemes as per service level:

(Household figure in lakh) Service Provision No. of No of No of Target FHTCs Scope for schemes Completed Ongoing households Provided additional schemes schemes FHTCs >= 55 lpcd 4,186 3,688 498 20.90 2.20 18.70 > =40 < 55 lpcd 8,965 8,771 254 20.28 5.31 14.98 <40 lpcd 8,716 8,417 299 13.08 4.39 8.69 Total 21,867 20,876 1,051 54.26 11.90 42.37

Scope for providing 33.68 lakh FHTCs through retrofitting and augmentation of existing schemes

2. Village-wise analysis: Villages FHTCs provided in Villages having ongoing/ completed Villages Total without PWS with villages PWS (0%) 100% 0 - <25 % 25-50% 50-75 % 75-90 % 90-100% FHTC No. of 2,565 7,120 11,325 831 541 181 78 9 villages (22.65%) (62.87%) No. of 21,08,965 58,71,968 FHTCs 88,96,267 5,88,429 2,72,398 48,858 5,649 0 (23.71%) (66.00%) remaining

3. District-wise analysis: S. No. Name of the district Total % of population having PWS % of FHTCs Provided Population Service level >= 40 LPCD (in Lakh) 1. Jhalawar 12.49 72.14 7.69 2. Tonk 10.82 63.03 7.87 3. Jodhpur 20.64 57.36 8.15 4. Ajmer 15.51 56.03 7.92 5. Bhilwara 18.69 55.54 10.51 6. Churu 14.79 54.90 16.83 7. Jaipur 31.89 45.72 17.27 8. Bikaner 15.83 44.79 25.34 9. Hanumangarh 14.27 41.21 23.69 10. Jhunjhunun 17.26 39.28 18.76 11. Ganganagar 14.67 37.76 6.41 12. Nagaur 26.72 36.75 17.07 13. Pali 15.46 36.16 36.67 14. Jaisalmer 5.85 35.73 2.80 15. Jalor 16.14 30.92 25.87

Page 15 of 18

16. Rajsamand 9.69 30.03 25.01 17. Bharatpur 19.88 25.05 2.97 18. Kota 7.97 24.59 13.27 19. Sirohi 8.55 24.56 28.83 20. Sawai Madhopur 10.90 24.31 9.49 21. Banswara 15.88 22.04 6.00 22. Sikar 20.73 21.66 14.21 23. Dhaulpur 9.72 19.86 4.77 24. Udaipur 23.57 19.64 9.08 25. Barmer 21.96 16.62 5.09 26. Karauli 12.16 14.88 16.43 27. Dungarpur 11.92 10.82 6.75 28. Baran 9.64 10.37 2.80 29. Dausa 14.05 8.33 6.52 30. Chittaurgarh 12.65 7.91 9.59 31. Bundi 8.81 6.92 7.24 32. Alwar 30.28 6.87 9.73 33. Pratapgarh 7.80 5.26 3.65

***

Page 16 of 18

Annex-III Jal Jeevan Mission: Rajasthan Analysis of villages with Piped Water Supply Schemes

Coverage level of FHTC in No. of FHTCs remaining in No. of villages villages these villages Nos. of village without PWS 18,868 29,91,675 Nos. of villages with PWS 24,436 50,64,191 Total 43,304 80,55,866 Coverage level of FHTC No. of FHTCs remaining in No. of villages within villages with PWS these villages >0 and <25 % 21,469 43,82,183 25-50% 1,011 3,69,940 50-75 % 989 2,43,469 75-90 % 492 58,636 >90 and <100% 311 9,963 100% 164 - Total 24,436 50,64,191

Details of households having Details of Households to be Total Numbers FHTC provided with FHTCs households Numbers In % Numbers In %

1,01,32,274 12,36,007 12.20 88,96,267 87.80

Numbers of FHTC Annual target (20% of the Shortfall in Target FHTC for provided and entered remaining households to annual target for 2020-21 (including in IMIS in 2019-20 be provided with FHTC) 2019-20 shortfall)

1,03,329 17,99,919 16,96,590 34,96,509

Note: The number of household details is as per presentation of the state.

Page 17 of 18

Annex-IV Jal Jeevan Mission: Rajasthan Financial Progress (Funding pattern 50:50) (Rs. in Crore) Central Share Mandatory State Matching Share Coverage NWQSM Total Coverage NWQSM Total Grand Total Year 2019-20

Opening Balance (As on 01.04.2019) 21.96 291.71 313.67 *21.96 *291.71 *313.67 627.34 Allocation 1,051.71 250.00 1,301.71 1,051.71 250.00 1,301.71 2,603.42 Release/ due share 1,051.71 250.00 1,301.71 1,073.67 590.67 1,664.34 2,966.05 Available fund 1,073.67 541.71 1,615.38 1,073.67 590.67 1,664.34 3,279.72 Expenditure 467.80 152.51 620.31 605.23 93.31 698.54 1,318.85 Year 2020-21

OB as on 1.04.2020 605.87 389.20 995.07 *605.87 *448.4 *1,054.27 2049.34 Allocation in 2020-21 2,522.03 - 2,522.03 2,522.03 - 2,522.03 5,044.06 Assured availability of fund in 2020-21 3,517.10 3,576.30 7,093.40 Total available fund in 2020-21 7,093.40 Crore *OB state matching share to be provided mandatorily.

1. 90.00 lakhs remaining households in state are to be provided with FHTCs by 2023-24. 2. Last year only 1,03,239 lakh HHs were provided with tap connections. 3. In 2019-20 State could spend only 1,318.85 crore (40.21%) out of available fund of Rs. 3,279.72 crore. This shows poor planning and expenditure. 4. In 2020-21, Rs. 7,093.40 crore (OB+ Allocation+ Matching state share) is available for JJM. There is huge challenge on state to improve performance. Other available resources for 2020-21 through convergence (source sustainability and grey water management): i.) 15th FC Grants to PRIs - Rs. 3,862 Crore ii.) Tentative allocation of SBM (G) – II for the whole country is apporx. Rs.5,000 Crore iii.) MGNREGA wage component is Rs. 6,600 Crore (30 Crore person days X wage rate 220). ****

Page 18 of 18