IN-VITRO PROPAGATION STUDIES of the ENDANGERED SUCCULENTS DROSANTHEMUM MICANS and DROSANTHEMUM HALLII (AIZOACEAE) by ASANDA MLUN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IN-VITRO PROPAGATION STUDIES of the ENDANGERED SUCCULENTS DROSANTHEMUM MICANS and DROSANTHEMUM HALLII (AIZOACEAE) by ASANDA MLUN View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cape Peninsula University of Technology IN-VITRO PROPAGATION STUDIES OF THE ENDANGERED SUCCULENTS DROSANTHEMUM MICANS AND DROSANTHEMUM HALLII (AIZOACEAE) by ASANDA MLUNGWANA Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Horticultural Science in the Faculty of Applied Sciences at the CAPE PENINSULA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Supervisor: Prof L Kambizi Co-supervisor: Dr I Matimati Bellville April 2018 CPUT copyright information The dissertation/thesis may not be published either in part (in scholarly, scientific or technical journals), or as a whole (as a monograph), unless permission has been obtained from the University. DECLARATION I, Asanda Mlungwana, declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Signed Date i DEDICATION I dedicated this work to my mother Nompendulo Elda Mlungwana and my late father Siphumo Robert Mlungwana. Lala ngoxolo Mzondi, uyawuhlala uphakathi kwentliziyo zethu. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to thank God for His guidance, constant love and blessings. Not forgetting my ancestors’ ooMyirha, Mzondi, Sampu, Ziyeka (Ithambo lenyoka lihlaba elimzondayo) for protection and love. A special thanks to Prof. Kambizi for his guidance, strength, valuable criticism, encouragement and advice. My sincere gratitude to Dr. Matimati, for his constant perseverance, supervision, support, sharing his knowledge and research expertise throughout this study. It was an honor and privilege working with you. I also wish to thank my mother Nompendulo Elda Mlungwana for her prayers, love and comfort when things get tough. I am the woman I am today ngenxayakho Marhadebe. My sister Zukiswa Mlungwana, my bothers Kholwani Mlungwana, Ntsikelelo Mlungwana and Banele Mlungwana. I would like to acknowledge the support and love of my friends and colleagues Sibusiso Xego, Pumla Staffa, Yonela Vakele, Axola Qongqo, and Mbulelo Ofisi. The Horticultural Science Department technicians Mvuyisi Mtshisazwe, Phumlani Roto, Terrance Hlokane Mabela and Deborah Erasmus for their assistance in ensuring that my experiment needs were met. Not forgetting the CPUT senior librarian Mrs Vuyokazi Kiva-Johnson for her wisdom. Lastly I would like to express my gratitude to the Karoo Botanical garden (SANBI), specifically Ricardo Riddles and Deon Viljoen for ensuring that I had enough plant material for my experiment. The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation towards this research is acknowledged. Opinions expressed in this thesis and the conclusions arrived at, are those of the author, and are not necessarily to be attributed to the National Research Foundation. iii CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ i DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................................................................... iii CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction, background to the research problem .......................................................... 1 1.1 General introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Statement of the research problem ............................................................. 1 1.1.2 Background of the study .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the study ....................................................................................... 3 1.3 References ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................... 6 Is in-vitro propagation of endangered Drosanthemum species endemic to the Succulent Karoo possible? .............................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Succulent plants and their importance in South Africa ....................................... 7 2.3 Diversity of the Aizoaceae family ....................................................................... 9 2.4 Drosanthemum species ................................................................................... 10 2.5 Taxonomy and conservation of the Aizoaceae family ...................................... 11 2.6 Cryopreservation of endangered Aizoaceae species ....................................... 14 2.7 In-vitro propagation of Aizoaceae plants .......................................................... 15 iv 2.8 Growth regulators for in vitro propagation of Aizoaceae .................................. 17 2.8.1 6-Benzyladenine (BA), 2-isopentenyladenine (2iP), kinetin and thidiazuron (TDZ) as shoot inducing hormones ........................................................................ 18 2.8.2 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and naphthalene acetic acid as root induction phytohormones ...................................................................................................... 18 2.9 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 18 2.10 References ................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................................. 31 In-vitro propagation studies of the endangered succulent Drosanthemum hallii (Aizoaceae) ................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 31 3.2 Materials and methods ..................................................................................... 32 3.2.1 Explant source ........................................................................................... 32 3.2.2 Sterilization method ................................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Culture medium and conditions ................................................................. 33 3.2.4 Acclimatization ........................................................................................... 33 3.2.5 Data collection and statistical analysis ...................................................... 34 3.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1 Callus induction in D. hallii ......................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Shoot formation of D. hallii ......................................................................... 37 3.3.3 Browning of D. hallii ................................................................................... 40 3.3.4 Rooting of D. hallii ..................................................................................... 43 v 3.3.5 Acclimatization of D. hallii .......................................................................... 45 3.4 Discussion and conclusion ............................................................................... 45 3.5 References ....................................................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................................. 53 Micropropagation studies of an endemic and endangered succulent Drosanthemum micans (Aizoaceae) ....................................................................................................... 53 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Materials and methods ..................................................................................... 53 4.2.1 Sourcing of explant .................................................................................... 53 4.2.2 Sterilization ................................................................................................ 54 4.2.3 Culture medium and conditions ................................................................. 54 4.2.4 Observation of cultures and statistical analysis ......................................... 54 4.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 55 4.3.1 Shoot
Recommended publications
  • A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report
    A Fine-Scale Conservation Plan for Cape Lowlands Renosterveld: Technical Report MAIN REPORT September 2003 Amrei von Hase Mathieu Rouget Kristal Maze Nick Helme Report No. CCU 2/03 Cape Conservation Unit Botanical Society of South Africa Pvt Bag X 10 7735 Claremont www.botanicalsociety.org.za/ccu Key Partners and Sponsors of the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project TABLE MOUNTAIN FUND 2 Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations have contributed generously to the Cape Lowlands Renosterveld Project to whom the Botanical Society and the project team are greatly indebted. We express our appreciation to you in this section and in addition have provided acknowledgement to others in sections of this report where their contribution was relevant. We are particularly indebted to our key project partners, the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (WCNCB), for putting their full support behind the project from its inception as well as their many contributions to the project. In Scientific Services we especially thank the late Chris Burgers, Helen de Klerk, Ernst Baard, Annelise le Roux, Guy Palmer and Andrew Turner for their guidance in the project planning and initiation stages, particularly on data and GIS matters. We are tremendously grateful to Chris who generously and infectiously shared with us his wealth of knowledge about the lowlands. In Operations we express our appreciation to the business unit managers, extension officers and regional ecologists who played a vital role particularly in shaping the final products of the project. We are especially grateful to Anton Wolfaardt and Chris Martens. Wendy Paisley of the Cape Conservation Unit (CCU) of the Botanical Society provided invaluable administrative and organizational support to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Map for the Riversdale Domain
    VEGETATION MAP FOR THE RIVERSDALE DOMAIN Project Team: Jan Vlok, Regalis Environmental Services, P.O. Box 1512, Oudtshoorn, 6620. Riki de Villiers, CapeNature, Private Bag X5014, Stellenbosch, 7599. Date of report: March 2007 Suggested Reference to maps and report: Vlok, J.H.J. & de Villiers, M.E. 2007. Vegetation map for the Riversdale domain. Unpublished 1:50 000 maps and report supported by CAPE FSP task team and CapeNature. 2 Dedication: For Anne Lise, my dear wife, who motivated so strongly for this study to be done. I sincerely hope that this work will enable her, current and future CapeNature colleagues to contribute more towards the conservation and sustainable use of the biodiversity of the rather remarkable biodiversity of the Riversdale region. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The vegetation of a circa 800 000 ha area in the Riversdale region of the southern Cape was classified and mapped at a scale of 1:50 000 for the CAPE Fine-Scale Conservation Plan task team. The vegetation was mapped as their occurrence was perceived to be in the 17th century, thus before any transformation due to European impacts. The classification system follows a six-tier hierarchy in order to facilitate analyses at biome, habitat type and vegetation unit level. Aquatic and terrestrial systems are recognized, with two biomes within aquatic ecosystems and five biomes within the terrestrial ecosystems. Aquatic ecosystems cover approximately 12 percent of the domain and terrestrial ecosystems 88 percent. At habitat level, 47 habitat types are recognized; six are within the aquatic ecosystems and 41 in the terrestrial ecosystems. Brief descriptions and a photograph are provided for each habitat type.
    [Show full text]
  • Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LXII (2011) Ashort History of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum
    ISSN 0486-4271 Inter national Organization forSucculent Plant Study Organización Internacional paraelEstudio de Plantas Suculentas Organisation Internationale de Recherche sur les Plantes Succulentes Inter nationale Organisation für Sukkulenten-Forschung Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LXII (2011) Ashort history of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum The first issue of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum (RPS) was produced in 1951 by Michael Roan (1909−2003), one of the founder members of the International Organization for Succulent Plant Study (IOS) in 1950. It listed the ‘majority of the newnames [of succulent plants] published the previous year’. The first issue, edited by Roan himself with the help of A.J.A Uitewaal (1899−1963), was published for IOS by the National Cactus & Succulent Society,and the next four (with Gordon RowleyasAssociate and later Joint Editor) by Roan’snewly formed British Section of the IOS. For issues 5−12, Gordon Rowleybecame the sole editor.Issue 6 was published by IOS with assistance by the Acclimatisation Garden Pinya de Rosa, Costa Brava,Spain, owned by Fernando Riviere de Caralt, another founder member of IOS. In 1957, an arrangement for closer cooperation with the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) was reached, and RPS issues 7−22 were published in their Regnum Ve getabile series with the financial support of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS), of which IOS remains a member to this day.Issues 23−25 were published by AbbeyGarden Press of Pasadena, California, USA, after which IOS finally resumed full responsibility as publisher with issue 26 (for 1975). Gordon Rowleyretired as editor after the publication of issue 32 (for 1981) along with Len E.
    [Show full text]
  • Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LXII (2011) Ashort History of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum
    ISSN 0486-4271 Inter national Organization forSucculent Plant Study Organización Internacional paraelEstudio de Plantas Suculentas Organisation Internationale de Recherche sur les Plantes Succulentes Inter nationale Organisation für Sukkulenten-Forschung Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum LXII (2011) Ashort history of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum The first issue of Repertorium Plantarum Succulentarum (RPS) was produced in 1951 by Michael Roan (1909−2003), one of the founder members of the International Organization for Succulent Plant Study (IOS) in 1950. It listed the ‘majority of the newnames [of succulent plants] published the previous year’. The first issue, edited by Roan himself with the help of A.J.A Uitewaal (1899−1963), was published for IOS by the National Cactus & Succulent Society,and the next four (with Gordon RowleyasAssociate and later Joint Editor) by Roan’snewly formed British Section of the IOS. For issues 5−12, Gordon Rowleybecame the sole editor.Issue 6 was published by IOS with assistance by the Acclimatisation Garden Pinya de Rosa, Costa Brava,Spain, owned by Fernando Riviere de Caralt, another founder member of IOS. In 1957, an arrangement for closer cooperation with the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) was reached, and RPS issues 7−22 were published in their Regnum Ve getabile series with the financial support of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS), of which IOS remains a member to this day.Issues 23−25 were published by AbbeyGarden Press of Pasadena, California, USA, after which IOS finally resumed full responsibility as publisher with issue 26 (for 1975). Gordon Rowleyretired as editor after the publication of issue 32 (for 1981) along with Len E.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetation Map for the Little Karoo. Unpublished Maps and Report for a SKEP Project Supported by CEPF Grant No 1064410304
    A VEGETATION MAP FOR THE LITTLE KAROO. A project supported by: Project team: Jan Vlok, Regalis Environmental Services, P.O. Box 1512, Oudtshoorn, 6620. Richard Cowling, University of Port Elizabeth, P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth, 6000. Trevor Wolf, P.O. Box 2779, Knysna, 6570. Date of Report: March 2005. Suggested reference to maps and this report: Vlok, J.H.J., Cowling, R.M. & Wolf, T., 2005. A vegetation map for the Little Karoo. Unpublished maps and report for a SKEP project supported by CEPF grant no 1064410304. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Stakeholders in the southern karoo region of the SKEP project identified the need for a more detailed vegetation map of the Little Karoo region. CEPF funded the project team to map the vegetation of the Little Karoo region (ca. 20 000 km ²) at a scale of 1:50 000. The main outputs required were to classify, map and describe the vegetation in such a way that end-users could use the digital maps at four different tiers. Results of this study were also to be presented to stakeholders in the region to solicit their opinion about the dissemination of the products of this project and to suggest how this project should be developed further. In this document we explain how a six-tier vegetation classification system was developed, tested and improved in the field and the vegetation was mapped. Some A3-sized examples of the vegetation maps are provided, with the full datasets available in digital (ARCVIEW) format. A total of 56 habitat types, that comprises 369 vegetation units, were identified and mapped in the Little Karoo region.
    [Show full text]
  • Disparity, Diversity, and Duplications in the Caryophyllales
    Research Disparity, diversity, and duplications in the Caryophyllales Stephen A. Smith1, Joseph W. Brown1, Ya Yang2, Riva Bruenn3, Chloe P. Drummond3, Samuel F. Brockington4, Joseph F. Walker1, Noah Last2, Norman A. Douglas3 and Michael J. Moore3 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA; 2Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA; 3Department of Biology, Oberlin College, 119 Woodland St, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097, USA; 4Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK Summary Author for correspondence: The role played by whole genome duplication (WGD) in plant evolution is actively debated. Stephen A. Smith WGDs have been associated with advantages such as superior colonization, various adapta- Tel: +1 734 615 5510 tions, and increased effective population size. However, the lack of a comprehensive mapping Email: [email protected] of WGDs within a major plant clade has led to uncertainty regarding the potential association Received: 30 May 2017 of WGDs and higher diversification rates. Accepted: 28 July 2017 Using seven chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal genes, we constructed a phylogeny of 5036 species of Caryophyllales, representing nearly half of the extant species. We phylogenetically New Phytologist (2017) mapped putative WGDs as identified from analyses on transcriptomic and genomic data and doi: 10.1111/nph.14772 analyzed these in conjunction with shifts in climatic occupancy and lineage diversification rate. Thirteen putative WGDs and 27 diversification shifts could be mapped onto the phylogeny. Key words: Caryophyllales, climatic occupancy, diversification rates, duplications, Of these, four WGDs were concurrent with diversification shifts, with other diversification phylogenomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Design Manual Aug 2021
    ` ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL – August 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2.0 REGULATORY DEFINITIONS …………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 3.0 DEFINING THE ARCHITECTURE ……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.0 DESIGN MANUAL ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 5.0 ERF TYPES KEY PLANS …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 6.0 PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS ………………………………………………………………… 39 7.0 LANDSCAPE MANUAL ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 42 8.0 APPENDICES: APPENDIX A: WALL COLOURS ……………………………………………………………………………….. 44 APPENDIX B: GUIDELINE PLANTING LIST ……………………………………………………………….. 45 APPENDIX C: CONCEPT BUILDING PLAN SUBMISSION FORM ……….………………………. 54 APPENDIX D: FINAL BUILDING PLAN APPLICATION FORM ……….…………………………… 56 APPENDIX E: ALTERATIONS APPLICATION FORM …………………………………………………. 58 Page 2 of 53 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Outeniquasbosch is an eco-estate located on the outskirts of the coastal town Mossel Bay, between the Hartenbos and Brandwag rivers. This area is known as the Garden Route, a popular holiday destination which stretches along the Southern Cape coast from Mossel Bay in the west to Natures Valley in the east. The closest town is Hartenbos to the south-east, conveniently within easy reach of the development. Both George and Mossel Bay, two major towns in the Garden Route, are accessible along the N2 motorway and are both not more than 30 minutes’ drive away by car. Outeniquasbosch will be developed on an undulating terrain with prominent ridges and valleys rich in indigenous vegetation. A number of game species was introduced more than 30 years ago and these roam freely along the slopes and valley thicket. The entire property is game fenced along its perimeter. It is within this natural habitat that approval has been granted by the authorities for the development of the Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Backbone for the Global Synthesis of Species Diversity in the Angiosperm Order Caryophyllales
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia; Berendsohn, Walter G; Borsch, Thomas; Mering, Sabine Von; Akhani, Hossein; Arias, Salvador; Castañeda-Noa, Idelfonso; Eggli, Urs; Eriksson, Roger; Flores-Olvera, Hilda; Fuentes-Bazán, Susy; Kadereit, Gudrun; Klak, Cornelia; Korotkova, Nadja; Nyffeler, Reto; Ocampo, Gilberto; Ochoterena, Helga; Oxelman, Bengt; Rabeler, Richard K; Sanchez, Adriana; Schlumpberger, Boris O; Uotila, Pertti Abstract: The Caryophyllales constitute a major lineage of flowering plants with approximately 12500 species in 39 families. A taxonomic backbone at the genus level is provided that reflects the current state of knowledge and accepts 749 genera for the order. A detailed review of the literature of the past two decades shows that enormous progress has been made in understanding overall phylogenetic relationships in Caryophyllales. The process of re-circumscribing families in order to be monophyletic appears to be largely complete and has led to the recognition of eight new families (Anacampserotaceae, Kewaceae, Limeaceae, Lophiocarpaceae, Macarthuriaceae, Microteaceae, Montiaceae and Talinaceae), while the phylogenetic evaluation of generic concepts is still well underway. As a result of this, the number of genera has increased by more than ten percent in comparison to the last complete treatments in the Families and genera of vascular plants” series. A checklist with all currently accepted genus names in Caryophyllales, as well as nomenclatural references, type names and synonymy is presented. Notes indicate how extensively the respective genera have been studied in a phylogenetic context.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships in the Southern African Genus Drosanthemum (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae)
    Phylogenetic relationships in the southern African genus Drosanthemum (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae) Sigrid Liede-Schumann1, Guido W. Grimm2, Nicolai M. Nürk1, Alastair J. Potts3, Ulrich Meve1 and Heidrun E.K. Hartmann4,† 1 Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany 2 Unaffiliated, Orléans, France 3 African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa 4 Department of Systematics and Evolution of Plants, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany † Deceased. ABSTRACT Background. Drosanthemum, the only genus of the tribe Drosanthemeae, is widespread over the Greater Cape Floristic Region in southern Africa. With 114 recognized species, Drosanthemum, together with the highly succulent and species-rich tribe Ruschieae, constitute the `core ruschioids' in Aizoaceae. Within Drosanthemum, nine subgenera have been described based on flower and fruit morphology. Their phylogenetic relationships, however, have not yet been investigated, hampering understanding of monophyletic entities and patterns of geographic distribution. Methods. Using chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence data, we performed network- and tree-based phylogenetic analyses of 73 species of Drosanthemum with multiple accessions for widespread species. A well-curated, geo-referenced occurrence dataset comprising the 134 genetically analysed and 863 further accessions was used to describe the distributional ranges of intrageneric lineages and the genus as a whole. Results. Phylogenetic inference supports nine clades within Drosanthemum, seven of which group in two major clades, while the remaining two show ambiguous affinities. The nine clades are generally congruent to previously described subgenera within Submitted 8 November 2019 Accepted 26 March 2020 Drosanthemum, with exceptions such as cryptic species. In-depth analyses of sequence Published 8 May 2020 patterns in each gene region were used to reveal phylogenetic affinities inside the Corresponding author retrieved clades in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • CREW Newsletter – 2015
    Volume 11 • April 2015 CREW –National Overview Domitilla Raimondo, Threatened Species Programme Manager REW, the Custodians of C Rare and Endangered ast year, 2014, has been a others do monthly fieldtrips. Some Wildflowers, is a programme Lbumper year for the CREW cover a very wide area, while oth- that involves volunteers from programme: our network of vol- ers concentrate their monitoring on the public in the monitoring unteers has expanded into the a few highly threatened sites close and conservation of South Albany area of the Eastern Cape to where they live. Overall though Africa’s threatened plants. under the leadership of Vatiswa what stands out is that as each CREW aims to capacitate a Zikishe, with a first set of CREW year goes by, the knowledge of our network of volunteers from fieldtrips in the region already volunteers grows and more-and- a range of socio-economic yielding some interesting data more interesting species are found. backgrounds to monitor on plant species endemic to Hidden in the pages of this news- and conserve South Africa’s the Albany region (see page 5); letter are numerous discoveries of threatened plant species. a new CREW group has been new plant species, as well so many The programme links vol- formed for Gauteng and has just rediscoveries of plants not seen for unteers with their local started fieldwork in this highly decades. It is incredible to see that conservation agencies and threatened province (see page many of you volunteers are finding particularly with local land 38); the Fynbos-based CREW so many new threatened and range stewardship initiatives to en- have been incredibly productive restricted species that you have not sure the conservation of key with a record number of sites previously recorded and this shows sites for threatened plant being recorded this past year the need for long-term monitoring species.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme and Abstracts
    Conference Programme and Abstracts enue etc. x Caryophyllales 2015 September 14-19, 2015 Conference Programme Caryophyllales 2015 – Conference Programme and Abstracts Berlin September 14-19, 2015 © The Caryophyllales Network 2015 Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem Freie Universität Berlin Königin-Luise-Straße 6-8 WLAN Name: conference 14195 Berlin, Germany Key: 7vp4erq6 Telephon Museum: +49 30 838 50 100 2 Programme overview Pre-conference Core conference Workshops Time slot * Sept 13, 2015 (Sun) Sept 14, 2015 (Mon) Sept 15, 2015 (Tue) Sept 16, 2015 (Wed) Sept 17, 2015 (Thu) Sept 18, 2015 (Fri) Session 3: Session 7: Floral EDIT Platform Herbarium management: 9.00-10.30 Opening session Caryophyllaceae (1) morphology (Introduction) JACQ Coffee break & Coffee break & Coffee break & 10.30-11.00 Coffee break Coffee break Poster session Poster session Poster session Herbarium Sileneae Session 1: Session 4: Session 8: EDIT Platform 11.00-12.30 management biodiversity Adaptive evolution Caryophyllaceae (2) A wider picture (hands-on) JACQ informatics 12.30-14.00 Lunch break Lunch break Lunch break Sileneae Session 2: Session 5: Session 9: EDIT Platform 14.00-15.30 Xper2 biodiversity Amaranthaceae s.l. Portulacinae Different lineages (hands-on) informatics Coffee break & Coffee break & 15.30-16.00 Coffee break Coffee break Coffee break Poster session Poster session Session 6a/b: Tour: Garden & EDIT Platform 16.00-17.30 Caryophyllaceae (3) Closing session Xper2 Dahlem Seed Bank (hands-on) / Aizoaceae Tour: Herbarium, 17:30-18:45 Museum, Library 18:30 19:00 Ice-breaker Conference dinner * exact timing see programme Caryophyllales 2015 September 14-19, 2015 Conference Programme Sunday, Sept.
    [Show full text]