Myth and Memory: the Construction and Deconstruction of Ethnic Conflict in Colonial and Post-Colonial Rwanda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Myth and Memory: the Construction and Deconstruction of Ethnic Conflict in Colonial and Post-Colonial Rwanda COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). Myth and Memory: The Construction and Deconstruction of Ethnic Conflict in Colonial and Post-colonial Rwanda By Nicasius Achu Check A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Literature and Philosophy Promoter Prof Yolanda Sadie Department of Politics and International Relations University of Johannesburg 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION, AIM & SCOPE OF STUDY 13 CHAPTER 1 CONCEPTUAL AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 1 Introduction 46 1.1 Understanding myth and memory 47 1.2 Conceptual and analytical understanding of myth and memory 54 1.2.1 Functional myth model 55 1.2.2 Rational myth model 56 1.2.3 Political myth model 57 1.2.4 Structural myth model 60 1.2.5 Elements of the structural approach 61 1.3 On the conceptualisation of myth in the study 63 1.4 Myth as a form of political acculturation in Rwanda 64 1.5 Structuralism as a form of analysing complex social interactions 67 1.6 Conceptual understanding of memory 68 1.6.1 Individual memory approach 69 1.6.2 Collective memory approach 71 1.7 Memory as a function of myth in Rwanda 72 1.8 Towards a definition of ethnic conflict 73 1.9 Theories of ethnic conflict 75 1.9.1 Eclectic and class theories 76 1.9.2 Instrumental and symbolic theories 77 1.10 Conclusion 81 2 CHAPTER 2 SITUATING RWANDA IN A HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT 2 Introduction 83 2.1. Rwandan pre-colonial generalities 84 2.2. The dialectic of state formation in Central Africa 90 2.3. Hutu, Tutsi and Twa in Rwanda: The pre-colonial era 92 2.4. The search for a Rwandese identity: The colonial era 98 2.5. The racialisation of Rwandan society in the colonial era 102 2.6. The road to independence 105 2.7. The 1959 revolution 109 2.8. The birth of a Rwandan republic 112 2.9. Post-independence Rwanda 114 2.10. Rwanda’s First and Second Republics: The construction of an ethnic enclave 116 2.11. Conclusion 119 CHAPTER 3 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DIVIDED SOCIETY IN RWANDA: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL MYTH 3 Introduction 121 3.1 Myths in Rwanda: The pre-colonial era 122 3.2 Myths in colonial Rwanda 132 3.3 Mythical narratives in the post-colonial era: The resurrection of the Hamitic myth 140 3.4 Mythical narratives in the run-up to the genocide 144 3.5 Conclusion 149 3 CHAPTER 4 FROM PRE-COLONIAL TIMES TO THE ADVENT OF GENOCIDE: THE ROLE OF MEMORY 4 Introduction 151 4.1 Pre-colonial memories 152 4.2 Memories of the colonial era 162 4.2.1 The German occupation 162 4.2.2 Transformation of social classes into racial and ethnic groups 164 4.2.3 Memory on the role of the Catholic Church in perpetuating division in Rwanda 167 4.2.4 The changing policy direction of the church and the colonial administration 169 4.3 Post-colonial memories 172 4.3.1 Memory and violence: The inyenzi attacks 173 4.3.2 The celebration of Hutuness in post-colonial Rwanda 173 4.3.3 Memory narratives in the post-colonial Hutu administrations 175 4.4 Conclusion 177 CHAPTER 5 SETTING THE SCENE FOR THE GENOCIDE: 1990 – 1994 5 Introduction 179 5.1 Uganda’s indigenisation policies and their impact on Rwandan Tutsi refugees 179 5.2 The invasion of Rwanda by the RPF 184 5.3 The Arusha negotiations 186 5.4 Arrival of the UN and the advent of the genocide 193 5.5 The genocide and the deconstruction of the Tutsi ethnic superiority 4 myth 198 5.6 Reaction of the international community to the killings 201 5.7 Conclusion 207 CHAPTER 6 ‘NEGOTIATING MEMORY’ IN POST-GENOCIDE RWANDA 6 Introduction 208 6.1 The genocide: 20 years later and beyond 209 6.1.1 The refugee question 211 6.1.2 Post-genocide ethnic relations 213 6.1.3 Gacaca and the ICTR process: The search for a post-genocide justice framework 215 6.1.4 Ndimurwanda: ‘Rwandaness’ as a way forward 221 6.2 Perceptions of reconciliation initiatives in post-genocide Rwanda 222 6.3 Collective memory in the post-genocide era 228 6.4 Conclusion 233 CHAPTER 7 MAIN FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS 7 Scope, rationalisation and theoretical framework 235 7.1 Key findings 238 7.1.1 Key findings on the role of myths 239 7.1.2 Key findings: Memory 242 7.2 Negotiating memory in the post-genocide political dispensation 245 7.3 Contribution to the field of study 247 7.4 Areas for future research 248 Bibliography 250 Addendum (Respondents) 271 5 Abstract This thesis analyses the role of political myth as an instrument of the social mobilisation of various segments of Rwandan society, and the role memory has played in shaping perceptions and societal interactions over time in this context. Therefore, of particular importance is the manner in which myth and memory have contributed to dividing the people of Rwanda along social and class lines, which eventually culminated in the Rwandan genocide of 1994. In addition to existing scholarly contributions, this study is based on interviews with both Hutu and Tutsi survivors of the genocide. In establishing the role of myth, the structural approach is used. With regard to memory, the direct and indirect memory narratives of respondents are analysed. Direct memories are those that respondents have gained from first-hand experience, while indirect memories are those they have acquired through oral or written transmission. The study finds that myth and memory have played important roles in shaping the perceptions of both Hutus and Tutsis regarding the other. Myths propagated and reinforced ethnic differences in Rwanda – one of the most important being the Kigwa myth, which affirmed the superior ethnic status of the Tutsis. This superiority was perpetuated after the implantation of colonialism, when racial segregation as a means for the structural transformation of African colonial society became the norm. Consequently, the Tutsis began to play an increasingly important role in the colonial administration until the late 1950s, when a change in colonial policy direction in favour of the Hutus took place. The colonialists considered Rwanda to be a Hamitic kingdom, a position that precludes the existence of pre-Tutsi Rwandan traditions. The change in colonial policy direction towards the Hutus was as a result of the post- Second World War myth in Rwanda that suggests that Hutus had developed sophisticated state machinery before the arrival of the Tutsis. These contradictory mythical narratives played an important role in creating separate nationalities within the Rwandan polity, which helped in shaping the opinions of members of the two main ethnic groups in Rwanda in a way that turned them against the other. The role it played in the manner in which people were killed in 1994 should be viewed within a wider context than the immediate causes of the genocide. The creation of these separate groups inevitably 6 resulted in major differences in the way in which the past is remembered by Hutus and Tutsis. For the majority of Hutu interviewees, divisions between the Hutus and Tutsis were sown during the pre-colonial period through a system of social contracts such as the ubuhuke and ibinkigi, which restricted the Hutus and Twas to a lifetime of labour and service to their Tutsi masters. For Tutsi respondents, entering into a contractual obligation with the Hutus was another way of diversifying the food base of Rwanda. However, the implications and interpretations of such contracts were, according to Hutus, biased towards the Tutsis, thus creating tension between the groups. This was further enhanced by colonialism – a period which, until the late 1950s, is regarded by the Hutus as one in which their dignity as a people was taken away from them. The Hutus blame the Tutsis for fashioning and directing the separatist policy that the colonial administrators adopted soon after their arrival in Rwanda in 1894. The memory of post-colonial Rwanda for Tutsis is one of becoming an ethnic minority in Rwandan political discourse. For Hutus, on the other hand, this period was a time when Hutu pride and the sense of nationhood among them were solidified and when the sense of ‘Hutuness’ was at its peak. Hutus were privileged in all domains of the country. It is also evident from the interviewees that memories (and more importantly, the recollection by the Hutus of the ill manner in which they were treated by the Tutsis in the pre-colonial and colonial era) may have contributed to the Hutu people developing an attitude of revenge during the political dispensation that immediately followed the colonial period. Given the existence of different memories for Hutus and Tutsis, which culminated in the genocide in 1994, it was also important to establish how post-genocide reconstruction efforts are perceived from the two traditionally opposing sides.
Recommended publications
  • Entanglements of Modernity, Colonialism and Genocide Burundi and Rwanda in Historical-Sociological Perspective
    UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS Entanglements of Modernity, Colonialism and Genocide Burundi and Rwanda in Historical-Sociological Perspective Jack Dominic Palmer University of Leeds School of Sociology and Social Policy January 2017 Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is their own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2017 The University of Leeds and Jack Dominic Palmer. The right of Jack Dominic Palmer to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Jack Dominic Palmer in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to thank Dr Mark Davis and Dr Tom Campbell. The quality of their guidance, insight and friendship has been a huge source of support and has helped me through tough periods in which my motivation and enthusiasm for the project were tested to their limits. I drew great inspiration from the insightful and constructive critical comments and recommendations of Dr Shirley Tate and Dr Austin Harrington when the thesis was at the upgrade stage, and I am also grateful for generous follow-up discussions with the latter. I am very appreciative of the staff members in SSP with whom I have worked closely in my teaching capacities, as well as of the staff in the office who do such a great job at holding the department together.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Genocide: Community Work in Rwanda
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bonnier, Evelina; Poulsen, Jonas; Rogall, Thorsten; Stryjan, Miri Working Paper Preparing for genocide: Community work in Rwanda Working Paper, No. 2015:1 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, Uppsala University Suggested Citation: Bonnier, Evelina; Poulsen, Jonas; Rogall, Thorsten; Stryjan, Miri (2015) : Preparing for genocide: Community work in Rwanda, Working Paper, No. 2015:1, Uppsala University, Department of Economics, Uppsala, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-242293 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/125541 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Department of Economics Working Paper 2015:1 Preparing for Genocide: Community Work in Rwanda Evelina Bonnier, Jonas Poulsen, Thorsten Rogall and Miri Stryjan Department of Economics Working paper 2015:1 Uppsala University January 2015 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • National Symbols As Commemorative Emblems in Nigerian Films
    European Scientific Journal January 2018 edition Vol.14, No.2 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 National Symbols as Commemorative Emblems in Nigerian Films Alawode, Sunday Olayinka PhD Adesanya, Oluseyi Olufunke Agboola, Olufunsho Cole Lagos State University School Of Communication Lagos, Osodi, Lagos State, Nigeria Religion, Communication and Culture Working Group Doi: 10.19044/esj.2018.v14n2p100 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n2p100 Abstract Nigerian films worldwide are the entertainment offerings of the nation, a burgeoning industry with steady increase growth rate and contributing substantially to the GDP of the nation. National symbols are objects, entities and relics representing an idea, concept, character that may be physical, abstract, religious, cultural, and linguistic among others in a sovereign context and beyond. Symbols or objects that connected together may not have anything in common in reality but by association and common agreement, they have come to represent each other in social contexts; a symbol may arbitrarily denote a referent, icon and index. In the case of Nigeria, the National flag, Anthem, Pledge, Currency, language, Coat of arms, National institutions like the National Assembly complex, Federal Capital Territory (FCT), images of past leaders, historical monuments like the Unknown Soldier (representing military men who died in the cause of protecting the nation), dresses are some of these national symbols. Apart from commemorative historical functions, national symbols are also used to represent hard work, credibility or truthfulness, as well as ethnic differentiation, religious affiliation, cultural background, social status, professional orientation, class distinction among others. Theorizing with Gate-keeping and Framing Analysis, this study adopts a content analysis design which is the study of recorded human communications, an objective and systematic analysis of the contents of any document that are manifest.
    [Show full text]
  • Flag Research Quarterly, June 2017, No. 13
    FLAG RESEARCH QUARTERLY REVUE TRIMESTRIELLE DE RECHERCHE EN VEXILLOLOGIE JUNE / JUIN 2017 No. 13 A research publication of the North American Vexillological Association-Une publication de recherche de l‘Association nord-américaine Branding the Nations: de vexillologie A Graphic Designer Looks at Flags and Marketing By Michael Green “…this word branding which sounds so superficial and seems so superficial to so many people is absolutely fundamental to the human condition; because what it is about is belonging. People want to belong—they want to belong to a school, they want to belong to a country, they want to belong to a city, they want to belong to a socioeconomic group—there are all kinds of things they want to belong to. They want to belong and they want to display the symbols of belonging. And branding is about belonging and displaying the symbols of belonging. It is a visceral part of the human condition and to think otherwise is to make a very big mistake.” ~ Wally Olins1 INSIDE / SOMMAIRE Page Editor’s Note / Note de la rédaction 2 Coloniality, Westphalian Sovereignty, and Flag Design: The Francophone African Case 8 NAVA 51 Annual Meeting • Boston 14 Letter to the Editor 15 continued on page 3 JUNE / JUIN 2017 | No. 13 Page 2 Editor’s Note / Note de la rédaction FLAG RESEARCH QUARTERLY / REVUE TRIMESTRIELLE DE RECHERCHE EN We are witnessing a trend in the United States and England, as numerous cities and VEXILLOLOGIE NO. 13 counties are adopting or changing their flags. (Attendees at the International Congress 2017 of Vexillology in London, or the Annual Meeting of NAVA in Boston, will have the June / Juin 2017 chance to hear more about these developments.) These changes make the timing of the Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Peacebuilding: the Role of Colonialism and Authoritarianism in Serbia and Rwanda
    History and Peacebuilding: The Role of Colonialism and Authoritarianism in Serbia and Rwanda Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Graduate Program in Global Studies Carina Ray, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Global Studies by Bethany Clark May 2017 Copyright by Bethany Clark © 2017 ABSTRACT History and Peacebuilding: The Role of Colonialism and Authoritarianism in Serbia and Rwanda A thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Global Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Bethany Clark This thesis studies the role histories of colonialism and authoritarianism had in effecting the types of peacebuilding processes that developed in Serbia and Rwanda after their conflicts in the 1990s. It contends that while Serbia’s history developed into a society that depended on civil society networks to act as a bridge between the population and the government, Rwanda’s created a society where the population depended on central authority. As a result, in the wake of conflict Serbian society depended on that history of civil society to foster healing and reconciliation, but Rwanda fell upon its history of central authority involving itself in culture and cultural institutions. As a result, Serbia’s civil society forms the vast majority of peacebuilding programs, but in Rwanda the government focuses on legal procedures and national programs. This thesis concludes that while both models of peacebuilding have benefits, one without the other cannot bring true reconciliation. iii Table of Contents Title Page i Abstract ii Table of Contents iii Introduction 1 Chapter One: Context of Case Studies and Literature Review 5 a.
    [Show full text]
  • "Race" Relations in Rwanda: an Historical Perspective
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Arts - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2010 "Race" relations in Rwanda: An historical perspective Deborah Mayersen University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mayersen, Deborah, "Race" relations in Rwanda: An historical perspective 2010. https://ro.uow.edu.au/artspapers/1287 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Race Relations in Rwanda: An Historical Perspective Deborah Mayersen „“Genocide” Charge in Rwanda‟ blared the headline in The Times; a few days later it was „Rwanda Policy of Genocide Alleged.‟1 Yet these headlines are not from 1994, but 1964. And while the massacres to which they refer occurred on a far smaller scale than the 1994 genocide, they are unprecedented as massacres targeted at the Tutsi minority as a group. They occurred at the end of a decade of radical change for the tiny nation. In 1954, Rwanda was administered as part of Ruanda-Urundi, a United Nations Trust Territory under Belgian trusteeship.2 The Tutsi minority was regarded as racially superior, enjoyed preferential access to privilege and almost exclusive access to indigenous positions of authority. Their position seemed stably entrenched. Yet an examination of Rwanda just ten years later reveals a starkly contrasting picture. By 1964, the newly independent Republic of Rwanda was ruled almost exclusively by the Hutu majority.3 More than 300,000 Tutsi refugees were scattered around its borders; thousands had been killed in massacres following a failed refugee invasion.4 In the intervening decade the nation had experienced the full throes of rapid decolonisation, revolution and its first democratic elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Revolution
    EXCERPTED FROM Understanding Revolution Patrick Van Inwegen Copyright © 2011 ISBNs: 978-1-58826-748-1 hc 978-1-58826-775-7 pb 1800 30th Street, Ste. 314 Boulder, CO 80301 USA telephone 303.444.6684 fax 303.444.0824 This excerpt was downloaded from the Lynne Rienner Publishers website www.rienner.com Contents List of Tables and Figures vii Acknowledgments ix 1 Understanding Revolution 1 2 The “Life Course” of a Revolution 21 3 The Structural Causes of Revolution 35 4 The Role of Ideology, Part 1: Liberalism and Nationalism 57 5 The Role of Ideology, Part 2: Marxism and Religious Thought 77 6 The Sources of Revolutionary Leadership 103 7 Mobilizing the Masses 127 8 The Outcomes of Revolution 147 9 The Study of Revolution 175 Appendix: Case Studies 183 American Revolution (1776–1788) 184 French Revolution (1789–1799) 190 Mexican Revolution (1910–1920) 196 Russian Revolution (1917) 201 Chinese Revolution (1949) 207 Cuban Revolution (1959) 213 Nicaraguan Revolution (1979) 217 Iranian Revolution (1979) 222 v vi Contents Philippine Revolution (1986) 228 Tiananmen Square Prodemocracy Movement (1989) 233 South African Revolution (1994) 239 Rwandan Revolution (1994) 245 Serbian Revolution (2001) 249 East Timorese Independence (1974–2002) 253 Nepalese Revolution (1996–2008) 259 Bibliography 263 Index 273 About the Book 289 1 Understanding Revolution Revolution is the sex of politics. —H. L. Mencken H. L. Mencken’s famous statement on revolutions is illuminating in two re- spects. First, revolutions can be viewed as the sex of politics in the sense that they give birth to nations. Out of revolutionary periods are born the coun- tries that populate the modern international system.
    [Show full text]
  • Repatriation of Rwandan Returnees in Kigali
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2018 Repatriation of Rwandan Returnees In Kigali: Integration of those Born and Raised on Exile as a Result of the 1959 Violence Wave Cristina Taulet Sanchez SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the African History Commons, African Languages and Societies Commons, African Studies Commons, Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Sanchez, Cristina Taulet, "Repatriation of Rwandan Returnees In Kigali: Integration of those Born and Raised on Exile as a Result of the 1959 Violence Wave" (2018). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2905. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2905 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Repatriation of Rwandan Returnees In Kigali: Integration of those Born and Raised on Exile as a Result of the 1959 Violence Wave Cristina Taulet Sanchez Davidson College Post-Genocide Restoration and Peacebuilding School For International Training Rwanda, November 2018 Taulet
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwandan Genocide: Eye Witnesses to a Human Catastrophe
    THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE: EYE WITNESSES TO A HUMAN CATASTROPHE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies And of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal studies. By Benjamin Nzioka, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 2, 2011 THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE: EYE WITNESSES TO A HUMAN CATASTROPHE Benjamin Nzioka, B.A. Mentor: Gregory Havrilak, Ph.D. ABSTRACT On April 6, 1994, the jet carrying the Rwandan president Juvenal Habyarimana, was shot down as it approached Kigali airport—killing all aboard. The systematic slaughter of Rwanda‟s Tutsi minority by Hutu extremist hardliners began almost immediately. By killing ten UN peacekeepers, the hardliners who seemed to have done their homework well, knew the UN would abandon the peacekeeping mission and withdraw from Rwanda —and they were correct. For the next one hundred days using machetes and other low-tech weapons, the Hutus massacred almost one million Tutsis in a deliberate campaign to annihilate them. The systematic state-led effort to violently eliminate the Tutsi population unequivocally meets the definition of genocide adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948. If signatories of the Genocide Convention are obligated to prevent and punish the crime of genocide, why did the international community become bystanders to this horror? How could the screams of one million people be ignored? This thesis will analyze the response of both the United Nations and the United States
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
    UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda Chaired by William Wen Session XXIII United Nations Security Council United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda Topic A: Framework for the Mitigation of Ethnic Cleansing in Rwanda Topic B: Establishing Protocols for Resettlement and the International Tribunal Committee Overview ethnic cleansing and in assisting the recovery process. Most importantly, it is up Our committee, UNSC: United to all members of our UNSC committee to Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda, is a avoid the inadequacies and major failures of historical re-imagining of the UN Security the 1994 UNAMIR in our re-imagining of the Council’s role in the Rwandan Civil War and Rwandan Civil War and Genocide. Genocide (1993 – onwards). After heavy fighting between the Tutsi-dominated Rwandan Patriotic Front and the Hutu- Parliamentary Procedure majority Rwandan Armed Forces in the The UNSC: United Nations Rwandan Civil War, the Arusha Accords Assistance Mission for Rwanda is a was proposed to bring forth a new specialized committee. This means that democratic government that allowed unlike significantly larger General political participation by both ethnic Assembly committees, ours will compose of groups.1 UNAMIR was born in October 15 delegates each representing a nation that 1993, after Rwanda and Uganda requested is, for the sake of the committee, part of the UN presence in overseeing the United Nations Security Council in implementation of the Arusha Accords.2 1993/1994. After less than a year of operation, the Given the smaller nature of UNAMIR faced devastating setbacks specialized committees, debates can become ultimately culminating into a systematic more engaging, intimate, flexible, and fast- ethnic cleansing of Tutsi and moderate Hutu paced.
    [Show full text]
  • Divide and Rule: an Origin of Polarization and Conflict
    Divide and Rule: An Origin of Polarization and Conflict* Simon Alder Yikai Wang December 31, 2018 (link to latest version) Abstract We propose a theory of civil conflict where political elites strategically ini- tiate conflicts in order to polarize society and sustain their own power. We provide a micro-foundation for this divide-and-rule strategy by modeling po- larization as a lack of trust among groups in the population. Trust is shaped by economic interactions between members of different groups who observe past interactions and update their belief about the relationship with the other group. High trust in turn increases the expected gains from trade and there- fore the common interest of people to trade without being taxed by the elite. This leads to a revolutionary threat to which the elite responds by starting a conflict to interrupt trade and prevent trust from increasing further. JEL-Classification: D74, D83, F15, H30, N40 Keywords: Polarization, divide and rule, conflict, ethnic violence, autocracy, trade, trust *We would like to thank Simeon D. Alder, Josef Falkinger, Dominic Rohner, Viktor Tsyren- nikov, Fabrizio Zilibotti, Josef Zweim¨uller,and participants at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Economic Dynamics, the University of Oslo, and the University of Zurich for valuable com- ments. Caroline Chouard and Sebastian Ottinger provided excellent research assistance. Financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant IPCDP-229883) is gratefully acknowledged. Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, [email protected]. Department of Economics, University of Oslo, [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction Conflict causes enormous costs, and yet we often observe wide support in the popu- lation for political elites that initiate conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • IR Theory in Practice Case Study: the Rwandan Genocide, 1994
    Baylis, Smith and Owens: The Globalization of World Politics 7e Case Study: The Rwandan Genocide, 1994 IR Theory in Practice Case Study: The Rwandan Genocide, 1994 Introduction The Rwandan Genocide of 1994 has become one of the most widely studied examples of genocide since the end of the Second World War. It emerged in the context of the longer standing Rwandan civil war, in which the Hutu-led government and the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF), which largely consisted of former Tutsi refugees and expatriates, formed the dominant opposing parties. The conflict itself had begun in 1959, during the Hutu-led Rwandan Revolution. An anti-colonial struggle at heart, it sought to overthrow the Tutsi monarchy that ruled Rwandan territory since at least the 18th century, and which both of Rwanda’s colonial powers in the 20th century—Germany and Belgium—had supported, themselves ruling through Tutsi monarchs. While Hutu-led acts of violence against RPF members began to increase in 1962, the year of Rwandan independence, this did not see a large-scale development until 1990, when large numbers of Tutsi refugees who had fled from Rwanda during the Hutu-led colonial revolt, returned from Uganda and other neighbouring countries, where they had occupied often high-ranking positions in the military. In 1993 the signing of the so-called ‘Arusha Accords’ by the two opposing parties saw a temporary period of ceasefire. However, the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana, who had been in office since a military coup in 1973, meant that the ceasefire was broken, eventually resulting in the events that we now call the Rwandan Genocide; a period of three months—from April to July 1994—during which large percentages of the Tutsi and Pygmy Batwa ethnic groups were killed, while almost two million Rwandan citizens—most of them Hutu—were displaced.
    [Show full text]