Adjuvant EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Still an Investigational Approach
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
390 Editorial Commentary Adjuvant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: still an investigational approach Jacek Jassem Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland Correspondence to: Jacek Jassem. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 7 Dębinki St. 80-211, Gdańsk, Poland. Email: [email protected]. Provenance: This is an invited article commissioned by the Academic Editor Dr. Zhizhou Yang (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA). Comment on: Pennell NA, Neal JW, Chaft JE, et al. SELECT: A Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Erlotinib in Patients With Resected Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:97-104. Submitted Aug 18, 2019. Accepted for publication Aug 30, 2019. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.02 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.02 The development of epidermal growth factor receptor astonishing activity in advanced disease (6). Just 3 more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have revolutionized years were needed to establish the optimal 3-year duration treatment paradigms in lung cancer. Currently, EGFR of adjuvant treatment (7). Similarly, only 3 years elapsed TKIs constitute first- and second-line treatment of from the first trial showing the efficacy of dabrafenib plus choice for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung trametinib, drugs that target the mitogen-activated protein cancer (NSCLC) patients. The first-generation TKIs kinase (MAPK) pathway in advanced malignant melanoma (gefitinib, erlotinib and icotinib) have been supplemented with BRAF V600 mutations (8), to the demonstration of by second (afatinib and dacomitinib) and third-generation their benefit in adjuvant treatment (9). (osimertinib) molecules. Several other EGFR-TKIs are At present, the only standard systemic adjuvant treatment currently being investigated in clinical trials (1). option in operable stage II-III NSCLC, regardless of EGFR Typically, targeted anti-cancer therapies in solid mutation status, is cytotoxic chemotherapy, despite its mere malignancies are first investigated in advanced stages, and 5-year overall survival (OS) gain of 5% (10). subsequently agents with confirmed activity are promptly Until now only five randomized studies have been submitted to studies in early disease. An example of performed to assess EGFR-TKIs in operable NSCLC such development includes trastuzumab, a monoclonal (Table 1). Two of these studies compared EGFR TKI vs. antibody used in human type 2 EGFR (HER2) positive placebo (11,12), one chemotherapy followed by EGFR breast cancer. The first phase 3 study reporting the high TKI vs. chemotherapy alone (13), and two EGFR TKI efficacy of this agent in metastatic disease was published in vs. chemotherapy (14,15). The results of two early studies 2001 (2), and just 4 years later three large randomized trials including molecularly unselected patients were negative. demonstrated its value in the adjuvant setting (3,4). Adjuvant The prematurely closed NCIC CTG BR19 study did studies using trastuzumab in breast cancer included not show disease-free survival (DFS) or OS benefit of an impressive total number of around 20,000 patients, gefitinib for 2 years compared to placebo (11). Similarly, no and resulted in widespread implementation of this superiority was found from adjuvant erlotinib vs. placebo compound in the preoperative and postoperative settings. in the RADIANT study (12), which included patients with Another spectacular example is imatinib, a TKI used in EGFR protein-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry gastrointestinal stromal tumor, a relatively rare malignancy. or with EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ, the Efficacy of this compound in an adjuvant setting (5) was biomarkers currently considered ineffective in selection for documented 7 years after the first report showing its EGFR TKIs. © Translational lung cancer research. All rights reserved. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8(Suppl 4):S387-S390 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.02 S388 Jassem. EGFR TKIs in early NSCLC Table 1 Completed randomized studies of postoperative therapy with EGFR TKIs in NSCLC Selection N N Primary Study Phase Stage Region Study arms Main results (mEGFR) criteria (total) (mEGFR) endpoint North BR19 (11) III All NSCLC IBIIIA 503 15 G vs. placebo (2 y) OS NR America EGFR+ by OS NR; median DFS RADIANT (12) III IBIIIA Global 973 161 E vs. placebo (2 y) OS IHC or FISH 46.4 vs. 28.5 m (NS) PC × 4 with vs. Median DFS 39.8 vs. Li et al. (13) II mEGFR IIIA (N2) China 60 60 DFS without G (6 m) 27.0 (P=0.014) Two-year DFS rate 81% EVAN (14) II mEGFR IIIA China 102 102 E (2 y) vs. 4 × PV DFS vs. 54% (P=0.01) ADJUVANT (15) III mEGFR II–IIIA China 222 222 G (2 y) vs. 4 × PV DFS Median DFS 28.7 vs. (N1–N2) 18.0 m (P=0.005) EGFR TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; mEGFR, patients with EGFR mutation; G, gefitinib; OS, overall survival; NR, not reported; IHC, immunochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; E, erlotinib; DFS, disease free survival; NS, not significant; PC, pemetrexed plus cisplatin; PV, cisplatin plus vinorelbine. As expected, more promising were the results of three was not reached, the 5-year DFS was 56% (95% CI: 45– completed studies (all performed in China), enrolling 66%), and the 5-year OS was 86% (95% CI: 77–92%). selected patients with EGFR-mutant tumors. The first of Disease recurred in 40 patients, including four while on them, a small phase 2 trial, showed significantly longer adjuvant erlotinib. Treatment adherence was relatively poor, DFS of gefitinib for 6 months following pemetrexed- with 40% of patients requiring dose reductions by 50%, carboplatin combination, compared with chemotherapy and 16% further reduction to 25% of the original dose. Of alone (13). Another randomized phase 2 study (EVAN) the 36 patients with recurrence after completing erlotinib showed significantly higher 2-year DFS of erlotinib for treatment, 26 were retreated with this compound, and the 2 years compared to four cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine majority of them derived clinical benefit from re-exposure. chemotherapy (14). The only phase 3 study (ADJUVANT) Interestingly, of the 20 patients who had determined showed significantly longer DFS of gefitinib for 2 years EGFR mutation status of the recurrent tumor, all but one compared to four cycles of a cisplatin-vinorelbine maintained the original canonical EGFR mutation pattern. combination, but general results were disappointingly grim, The only patient with acquired T790M resistance mutation with almost all patients relapsing within 4 years (15). The was among those four who developed progression while meta-analysis of the five above-mentioned randomized receiving adjuvant erlotinib. This may imply the hypothesis studies (including only patients with EGFR mutation) that EGFR TKIs inhibit rather than kill cancer cells, and showed increased DFS with EGFR-TKI-based regimens that prolonged anti-EGFR treatment is unlikely to induce (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34–0.78, P=0.002), but this was not resistance mechanisms. The SELECT study was properly translated into OS benefit (16). designed and executed and provides another signal for Most recently presented were the results of an open-label potential role of EGFR TKI in adjuvant setting. However, single-arm phase 2 study (SELECT) performed in the USA, due to all the limitations of single-arm design, it still does that investigated the efficacy of adjuvant erlotinib in patients not provide strong evidence. with EGFR-mutant early-stage NSCLC (17). Considering In view of the relatively high incidence of EGFR-mutant the scarcity of data on adjuvant EGFR TKIs in the non- NSCLC, the number of studies investigating the role of Asian populations, this study has raised great interest. The EGFR TKI in an adjuvant setting, and the total number of SELECT study included 100 stage IA–IIIA patients and was participating patients is strikingly low. It is really difficult powered to demonstrate a 2-year DFS greater than 86%, to explain the reluctance to carry out more trials addressing i.e., 10% more compared with the historic figure of 76%. this concept. Additionally, the quality of randomized studies After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, this primary endpoint performed so far has been relatively low in terms of patient was met: 2-year DFS was 88%. The median DFS and OS selection, study design and execution. All three randomized © Translational lung cancer research. All rights reserved. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8(Suppl 4):S387-S390 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.02 Translational Lung Cancer Research, Vol 8, Suppl 4 December 2019 S389 studies enrolling exclusively EGFR-mutated patients were constituting a common resistance mechanism. Osimertinib, small and included the Chinese population. Patients from a third-generation EGFR TKI, has a minimal inhibition East Asia comprise a higher proportion of EGFR-mutant of wild-type EGFR, resulting in lower toxicity (18). This cases than those from other geographical regions, and compound is also more potent, and has a strong affinity for have distinctive clinicopathologic features. Hence, there sensitizing and resistance T790M mutation (19). is the question of whether the results of these studies may The role of EGFR TKIs in an adjuvant setting is be generalized, even though 83% of the SELECT study the subject of a few ongoing clinical studies. In the subjects were of non-Asian ethnicity. ALCHEMIST-EGFR (NCT02193282) trial, initiated in Importantly, none of the completed studies in patients 2014, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients are randomized selected by EGFR mutation used OS as the primary to 2-year erlotinib or placebo, both preceded by adjuvant endpoint.