Botswana-SA Water Quality Baseline Report 2013 (Limpopo River Basin)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Botswana-SA Water Quality Baseline Report 2013 (Limpopo River Basin) BOTSWANA-SOUTH AFRICA Joint Water Quality Project Supported by Resilience in the Limpopo Basin Program JOINT WATER QUALITY BASELINE REPORT LLIIMMPPOOPPOO BBAASSIINN BBEETTWWEEEENN TTHHEE RREEPPUUBBLLIICCSS OOFF BBOOTTSSWWAANNAA AANNDD SSOOUUTTHH AAFFRRIICCAA FINAL 22001111//22001122 Joint Water Quality Baseline Report for Limpopo Basin between Botswana and South Africa 2011/12 Department of Water Affairs: Botswana Department of Water Affairs: South Africa DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Title: Joint Water Quality Baseline Report for Limpopo Basin between Botswana and South Africa Date: August 2013 Authors: DWA Botswana DWA South Africa Reviewers: Participating beneficiaries: DWA Botswana DWA South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs, South Africa LIMCOM Dissemination level: Open for distribution Nature: Not confidential Version: Version 4.0 Status: Final Report i | P a g e F i n a l Joint Water Quality Baseline Report for Limpopo Basin between Botswana and South Africa 2011/12 Department of Water Affairs: Botswana Department of Water Affairs: South Africa TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTED ......................................................................................................... 5 ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 7 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Limpopo River Basin .......................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Demographics ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Status of Water Use ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.3 Potential Sources of Water Pollution .............................................................................................. 12 2.2 Water Quality Management ................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Water Hyacinth ................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Description ...................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.2 Water Hyacinth Control in the Limpopo Basin .............................................................................. 13 2.3.3 Key Considerations in the Control of Water Hyacinth ................................................................... 14 3 THE 2011/12 JOINT WATER QUALITY SURVEY .................................................................................. 15 3.1 Objectives Of The Joint Survey .......................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Scope and Limitations of the Joint Survey .......................................................................................... 15 3.3 Parameters Analysed ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Electrical Conductivity (EC)........................................................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) ................................................................................................................. 15 3.3.3 pH ................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.4 Turbidity ......................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.5 Total Dissolved Solids .................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.6 Nitrates ............................................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.7 Phosphate ........................................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.8 Potassium ........................................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.9 Calcium ........................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.10 Magnesium ................................................................................................................................. 16 3.3.11 Sodium ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.12 Iron ............................................................................................................................................. 17 3.3.13 Manganese .................................................................................................................................. 17 3.3.14 Copper ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1 | P a g e F i n a l Joint Water Quality Baseline Report for Limpopo Basin between Botswana and South Africa 2011/12 Department of Water Affairs: Botswana Department of Water Affairs: South Africa 3.3.15 Lead ............................................................................................................................................ 17 3.4 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Sampling Period .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.4.2 Methods Used for Collection and Analysis of Samples .................................................................. 18 3.4.3 Standards ........................................................................................................................................ 19 3.4.4 Aquatic Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.5 Joint Water Quality Monitoring Sites ................................................................................................. 20 3.5.1 Criteria Applied .............................................................................................................................. 20 3.5.2 Location and Description of Sites ................................................................................................... 20 4 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS OF THE 2011/12 JOINT FIELD SURVEYS ............................................. 24 4.1 Physico-Chemical Parameters ............................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Heavy Metals ...................................................................................................................................... 32 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 35 6 PROPOSED ACTION PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 37 6.1 Six-Point Short-To-Medium Term Action Plan .................................................................................. 37 6.2 Long-Term Action Plan ...................................................................................................................... 38 7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 39 8 ANNEXURES .............................................................................................................................................. 40 Annexure 1: Detailed River Water Quality Results .......................................................................................... 40 Annexure 2: Presence of Aquatic Plants ........................................................................................................... 46 Annexure 3: Applied Standards ........................................................................................................................ 49 Annexure 4: Pictures of Sampling Sites ........................................................................................................... 52 Annexure 5: Profile of Limpopo River Basin between Botswana and South Africa ........................................ 54 List of Tables Table 1: Applicable Standards
Recommended publications
  • Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa The
    This article was downloaded by: On: 12 May 2010 Access details: Access Details: Free Access Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t917447442 The geomorphic provinces of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: A physiographic subdivision for earth and environmental scientists T. C. Partridge a; E. S. J. Dollar b; J. Moolman c;L. H. Dollar b a Climatology Research Group, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS, South Africa b CSIR, Natural Resources and Environment, Stellenbosch, South Africa c Directorate: Resource Quality Services, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa Online publication date: 23 March 2010 To cite this Article Partridge, T. C. , Dollar, E. S. J. , Moolman, J. andDollar, L. H.(2010) 'The geomorphic provinces of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: A physiographic subdivision for earth and environmental scientists', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 65: 1, 1 — 47 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00359191003652033 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00359191003652033 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the Upper Limpopo River Basin: a Case Study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer
    Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the Upper Limpopo River Basin: A Case Study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer Submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Hydrogeology Submitted by: Simamkele Siyambonga Baqa Student number: 1098513 Supervisors: Dr. Karen Villholth (IWMI) Prof. Tamiru Abiye (Wits) July 2017 in Johannesburg Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the upper Limpopo River Basin: A case study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer Declaration I Simamkele Siyambonga Baqa declare that Groundwater Recharge Assessment in the upper Limpopo River Basin with a case study in Ramotswa Dolomitic Aquifer is my own investigation and covers no section copied in whole or in part from any source unless it is clearly acknowledged in quotation marks and with detailed, complete and precise referencing. Further, the report has not been submitted before for any degree or examination at any university. …………………………………….. (Signature) ………………… (Date) I Abstract Hydrogeological research was undertaken in the transboundary Ramotswa dolomitic aquifer to provide understanding and quantification of the processes governing recharge mechanism and rates, in order to promote efficient and sustainable groundwater resource utilization and development, as well as to improve the Ramotswa transboundary aquifer management. Hydrochemical and tracer approaches were utilized to evaluate the processes governing the recharge mechanism while the chloride mass balance approach was further applied to assess groundwater recharge rates. Results indicated that all groundwater samples contained detectable amounts of tritium highlighting the renewability of the transboundary Ramotswa aquifer resources. Two distinct water types were characterised: sub-modern waters approximately recharge prior to the 1950s and a mixture of modern and sub-modern waters of recently recharge rainfall indicative of active recharge in the area through intensive rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 6 - Fisheries Management Framework
    "Strengthening Fisheries Management in ACP Countries" ANNEX 6 - Fisheries Management Framework Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Project ref. N° SA-3.2- B15 Region: Southern Africa Country: Botswana November 2012 Assignment by: Project Funded by the European Union. “This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Prof Ian Cowx on behalf of Landell Mills and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.” “The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views of the concerned governments.” Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Project ref. N° SA-3.2- B15 Name of individual consultant Professor Ian Cowx Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 First draft 3/11/2012 2 Report 22/11/2012 Designed and produced at Landell Mills Ltd Task management & quality assurance by Charlotte Howell This report has been prepared with the financial support of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Landell Mills and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Project Funded by the European Union A project implemented by Landell Mills pg. 2 Fish Stock Assessment in Major Dams in Botswana Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS.......................................................................................................................... 4 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MAJOR DAMS IN BOTSWANA ............................. 8 3. STATUS OF THE FISHERIES IN THE MAJOR DAMS......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Gaborone Dam Catchment, Botswana, from 1984–2015 Using GIS and Remote Sensing
    sustainability Article Evaluating Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Gaborone Dam Catchment, Botswana, from 1984–2015 Using GIS and Remote Sensing Botlhe Matlhodi 1,* , Piet K. Kenabatho 1 , Bhagabat P. Parida 2 and Joyce G. Maphanyane 1 1 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Botswana, P/Bag UB 00704 Gaborone, Botswana; [email protected] (P.K.K.); [email protected] (J.G.M.) 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Botswana, P/Bag UB 0061 Gaborone, Botswana; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +267-355-5475 Received: 31 May 2019; Accepted: 7 August 2019; Published: 20 September 2019 Abstract: Land use land cover (LULC) change is one of the major driving forces of global environmental change in many developing countries. In this study, LULC changes were evaluated in the Gaborone dam catchment in Botswana between 1984 and 2015. The catchment is a major source of water supply to Gaborone city and its surrounding areas. The study employed Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) using Landsat imagery of 1984, 1995, 2005 and 2015. Image classification for each of these imageries was done through supervised classification using the Maximum Likelihood Classifier. Six major LULC categories, cropland, bare land, shrub land, built-up area, tree savanna and water bodies, were identified in the catchment. It was observed that shrub land and tree savanna were the major LULC categories between 1984 and 2005 while shrub land and cropland dominated the catchment area in 2015. The rates of change were generally faster in the 1995–2005 and 2005–2015 periods.
    [Show full text]
  • River Health Programme in the North West Province
    RIVER HEALTH PROGRAMME IN THE NORTH WEST PROVINCE What is the River Health Programme? ‚ It is a national programme co-ordinated by DWAF, DEAT, WRC designed to monitor the condition of rivers in South Africa using standardised bio- monitoring techniques. What is biomonitoring? ‚ Use of living organisms as biological indicators of ecosystem or environmental “health”. ‚ Animals and plants provide a long-term integrated reflection of water quality and quantity, habitat quality and other environmental conditions What is being monitored in the River Health Programme? Indices of Ecosystem health ‚ Fish (Fish Community Integrity Index) ‚ Aquatic Invertebrates (South African Scoring System SASS4) ‚ Aquatic Habitats (Integrated Habitat Assessment System IHAS) ‚ Plants (Riparian Vegetation Index RVI) ‚ Water flow (Hydrological Index) ‚ Water quality (Dissolved Oxygen, pH, Conductivity, Temperature) ‚ River channel condition (Geomorphological Index) Advantages of biomonitoring ‚ Detects changes in water quality e.g pollution from mining, industry and agriculture ‚ Detects effects of changes in water flow e.g dams, bridges and forestry ‚ Standardized method of comparison of water quality ‚ Easy to use practical means of assessing water quality ‚ Relatively cheap and quick ‚ Can detect water quality changes which may be missed by chemical sampling ‚ Non-destructive - animals returned live to water. Disadvantages to biomonitoring ‚ A fair amount of training is required ‚ Can be open to subjective interpretation ‚ Does not provide an exact figures of water quality parameters ‚ Cannot pinpoint the exact cause of water quality problems ‚ Has no legal standing North West Rivers identified for River Health Programme ‚ Groot Marico River ‚ Hex River near Rustenburg ‚ Elands River near Rustenburg ‚ Crocodile River downstream of Hartebeespoort Dam ‚ Mooi River near Potchefstroom ‚ Schoonspruit near Ventersdorp to Orkney ‚ Harts River from Lichtenburg to Spitzkop Dam ‚ the section of the Vaal River forming the boundary between the Free State and the North West.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterberg District Municipality Wetland Report | 2017
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY WETLAND REPORT | 2017 LOCAL ACTION FOR BIODIVERSITY (LAB): WETLANDS SOUTH AFRICA Biodiversity for Life South African National Biodiversity Institute Full Program Title: Local Action for Biodiversity: Wetland Management in a Changing Climate Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Southern Africa Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-674-A-14-00014 Contractor: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Secretariat Date of Publication: September 2017 Author: R. Fisher DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. FOREWORD It is a great pleasure and honour for me to be part of Catchment. The Nylsvlei is the largest inland floodplain the ICLEI – Local Action for Biodiversity programme wetland system in South Africa. Nylsvlei is within in preservation of the biodiversity, and wetlands in the world renowned UNESCO Waterberg Biosphere particular of the Waterberg District Municipality. On Reserve. The Nylsvlei is our pride in Eco-Tourism, a behalf of the people of Waterberg District Municipality, leisure destination of choice in Limpopo. Nylsvlei I would like to thank ICLEI for choosing the district to Nature Reserve is a 40 square kilometre protected be part of this programme. Tourism and Heritage area, lying on the floodplain of the Nyl River and opens the door to new opportunities, and it is good the uppermost section of the Mogalakwena River. to focus on promoting and protecting our amazing The area has been declared a RAMSAR Wetland site wetlands to domestic and international tourists. Our because of its international biodiversity conservation district seeks to promote and preserve South Africa’s importance that is endemic to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Commitment by the Executive Authority
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT BY THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE MAYOR Cllr P.S. KEKANA According to the Municipal Systems Act, each Municipal amendments made considering the contract we made Council must, within a prescribed period after its elected with the people of Waterberg during the local government term, adopt a single, inclusive strategic plan for the elections. development of the municipality. However, our Predecessor Council already adopted a draft IDP. We, in The tasks given to local government entail more an endeavor to execute our political mandate, followed demanding capabilities and performance. This means that the path laid by them and adopted the draft IDP with we are not only expected to find the means for addressing 1 2008/2009 IDP REVIEW WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY traditional local government challenges of delivering should do so by putting in place targeted support basic services to the people, but we are supposed to find programmes for our women mayors and councillors, and strategies and mechanisms that are potent enough to not rejoice at their failures.The success of the integrated remove the many bottlenecks which stand in the way of development plan as enshrined herein caters also for sustainable development in a local jurisdiction. The IDP development of infrastructure is dependant on the document that we adopted will serve as a blue-print that competencies of Councillors, municipal officials, and will gauge service delivery and timely implementation. service providersInfrastructure is the cornerstone of social upliftment and economic development. In particular, fast The next five years will be fundamentally different tracking Infrastructure delivery will also contribute to the regarding the kind of support that both national and Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa provincial government spheres will be providing to (ASGISA), and also assist in achieving the targeted municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin This Book Is a Product of the CODESRIA Comparative Research Network
    Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin This book is a product of the CODESRIA Comparative Research Network. Ecological Changes in the Zambezi River Basin Edited by Mzime Ndebele-Murisa Ismael Aaron Kimirei Chipo Plaxedes Mubaya Taurai Bere Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa DAKAR © CODESRIA 2020 Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa Avenue Cheikh Anta Diop, Angle Canal IV BP 3304 Dakar, 18524, Senegal Website: www.codesria.org ISBN: 978-2-86978-713-1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission from CODESRIA. Typesetting: CODESRIA Graphics and Cover Design: Masumbuko Semba Distributed in Africa by CODESRIA Distributed elsewhere by African Books Collective, Oxford, UK Website: www.africanbookscollective.com The Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) is an independent organisation whose principal objectives are to facilitate research, promote research-based publishing and create multiple forums for critical thinking and exchange of views among African researchers. All these are aimed at reducing the fragmentation of research in the continent through the creation of thematic research networks that cut across linguistic and regional boundaries. CODESRIA publishes Africa Development, the longest standing Africa based social science journal; Afrika Zamani, a journal of history; the African Sociological Review; Africa Review of Books and the Journal of Higher Education in Africa. The Council also co- publishes Identity, Culture and Politics: An Afro-Asian Dialogue; and the Afro-Arab Selections for Social Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Hydro-Electricity and Hydro-Agricultural Schemes in Africa
    FAO AQUASTAT Dams Africa – 070524 DAMS AND AGRICULTURE IN AFRICA Prepared by the AQUASTAT Programme May 2007 Water Development and Management Unit (NRLW) Land and Water Division (NRL) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Dams According to ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams), a large dam is a dam with the height of 15 m or more from the foundation. If dams are 5-15 metres high and have a reservoir volume of more than three million m3, they are also classified as large dams. Using this definition, there are more than 45 000 large dams around the world, almost half of them in China. Most of them were built in the 20th century to meet the constantly growing demand for water and electricity. Hydropower supplies 2.2% of the world’s energy and 19% of the world’s electricity needs and in 24 countries, including Brazil, Zambia and Norway, hydropower covers more than 90% of national electricity supply. Half of the world’s large dams were built exclusively or primarily for irrigation, and an estimated 30-40% of the 277 million hectares of irrigated lands worldwide rely on dams. As such, dams are estimated to contribute to 12-16% of world food production. Regional inventories include almost 1 300 large and medium-size dams in Africa, 40% of which are located in South Africa (517) (Figure 1). Most of these were constructed during the past 30 years, coinciding with rising demands for water from growing populations. Information on dam height is only available for about 600 dams and of these 550 dams have a height of more than 15 m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gis Approach for Flood Vulnerability and Adaptation Analysis in Diepsloot, Johannesburg
    A GIS APPROACH FOR FLOOD VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION ANALYSIS IN DIEPSLOOT, JOHANNESBURG ADELINE NGIE (Student No. 201003585) Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies Supervisors: Prof. H.J. Annegarn Maryna Storie Gauteng City-Region Observatory, (A collaboration between the University of Johannesburg, the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg and the Gauteng Provincial Government) A minor dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Management. 30 January 2012 Affidavit TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This serves to confirm that I, Adeline NGIE with student number 201003585 and bearer of Cameroonian Passport Number 01138195, enrolled for an MSc in Environmental Management with the Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies in the Faculty of Science, herewith declare that my academic work titled: A GIS approach for flood vulnerability and adaptation analysis in Diepsloot, Johannesburg, is in line with the Plagiarism Policy of the University of Johannesburg, with which I am familiar. I further declare that this work is authentic and original unless clearly indicated otherwise and in such instances full reference to the source is acknowledged and I do not pretend to receive any credit for such acknowledged quotations, and that there is no copyright infringement in my work. I declare that no unethical research practices were used or material gained through dishonesty. I understand that plagiarism is a serious offence and that should I contravene the Plagiarism Policy notwithstanding signing this affidavit, I may be found guilty of a serious criminal offence (perjury) that would amongst other consequences compel the University to inform all other tertiary institutions of the offence and to issue a corresponding certificate of reprehensible academic conduct to whoever request such a certificate from the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized BOTSWANA EMERGENCY WATER SECURITY AND EFFICIENCY PROJECTS UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE NORTH EAST DISTRICT AND TUTUME SUB DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY UPGRADING PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized March 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the North East District and Tutume Sub District Water Supply Upgrading Project Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... vi list of Appendices ................................................................................................................................................ vii ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... X 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Project ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Rationale/Objective ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shakati Private Game Reserve in Malaria-Free Waterberg/Vaalwater -Only 2 Hours from Pretoria
    Shakati Private Game Reserve in Malaria-free Waterberg/Vaalwater -only 2 hours from Pretoria Waterberg. There is so much to see and do…. Waterberg is the area of magnificent views, panoramic savannah and bush landscapes, spectacular mountains and cliffs, crystal clear streams and an unbelievable abundance of wild animals, trees and flowers. Game viewing in the Waterberg area is absolutely fantastic and recognised among the best in the country –hence the Waterberg is one of the preferred eco-tourism destination in South Africa. Furthermore Waterberg with its unspoilt nature has been designated as UNESCO “Savannah Biosphere Reserve” –the first in Southern Africa. And Waterberg is MALARIA-free… Marakele National Park Shakati Private Game Reserve is hidden away on the lush banks of the Mokolo river in the deep heart of the untamed Waterberg bushveld paradise. Near Vaalwater and only 2 hours drive from Pretoria. Time spent at Shakati Game Reserve is about getting away from city life, work, traffic and stress. It is about peace and tranquillity, clean fresh air and clear skies with the brightest stars you have probably ever seen. It is about being quiet and listen to the jackal calling at night, to the paradise flycatcher singing in the morning. It is about seeing and walking with the animals, touching the fruits of the bush willow -and wonder about nature. It is about quietly sitting at the water hole watching game and taking life easy Its time to leave the city sounds, the hustle, the bustle and find some place that speaks to you who you really are inside.
    [Show full text]