DOCSLIB.ORG

A Transparência Do Buscador Google Como Direito Dos Consumidores Na Tutela Do Meio Ambiente Digital Doutorado Em Direito

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Transparência Do Buscador Google Como Direito Dos Consumidores Na Tutela Do Meio Ambiente Digital Doutorado Em Direito PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC/SP Carolina Ferreira Souza A TRANSPARÊNCIA DO BUSCADOR GOOGLE COMO DIREITO DOS CONSUMIDORES NA TUTELA DO MEIO AMBIENTE DIGITAL DOUTORADO EM DIREITO São Paulo 2018 1 PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO PUC/SP Carolina Ferreira Souza A TRANSPARÊNCIA DO BUSCADOR GOOGLE COMO DIREITO DOS CONSUMIDORES NA TUTELA DO MEIO AMBIENTE DIGITAL Projeto de tese apresentado à Comissão de Bolsa, como exigência parcial para a concessão da Bolsa de Estudos para o Curso de Doutorado em Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo – PUC/SP (PEPGD), sob a Coordenação da Ilustríssima Senhora Professora Dra. Elizabeth Nazar Carrazza. Orientador: Prof.º Dr.º Gilson Delgado Miranda Área de Concentração do Programa: Direitos Difusos e Coletivos Linha de Pesquisa: Efetividade dos Direitos de Terceira Dimensão e Tutela da Coletividade, dos Povos e da Humanidade São Paulo 2018 2 ERRATA (SOUZA, Carolina Ferreira). (A TRANSPARÊNCIA DO BUSCADOR GOOGLE COMO DIREITO DOS CONSUMIDORES NA TUTELA DO MEIO AMBIENTE DIGITAL). (2018) (248). (Tese de Doutorado em Direito) – Programa de Estudos Pós- Graduados em Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo – PUC/SP (2018). 1. Folha de rosto. 4º parágrafo, linhas 1 a 5: Onde se lê: “Projeto de tese apresentado à Comissão de Bolsa, como exigência parcial para a concessão da Bolsa de Estudos”, leia-se “Tese apresentada à Banca Examinadora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica como exigência parcial para obtenção do título de DOUTORA em Direito”. 2. Agradecimentos. 1º parágrafo, linha 1 e 2º parágrafo, linha 1: Onde se lê: “A CAPES”, leia-se “À CAPES”. Onde se lê: “A FUNDASP”, leia-se “À FUNDASP”. 3. Abstract. 1º parágrafo. Linha 13: Onde se lê: “of not authorinzing”, leia-se “of authorinzing”. 4. Página 23. 1º parágrafo, linha 30: Onde se lê: “contínuo. [...].”, leia-se “contínuo. [...] (grifo nosso). 5. Página 24. 1º parágrafo, linha 40: Onde se lê: “favelas”, leia-se “favelas (grifo nosso)”. 6. Página 25. 3º parágrafo, linha 39: Onde se lê: “História”, leia-se “Historia (grifo nosso)”. Banca Examinadora 3 Dedicatória Dedico este trabalho ao André, razão da minha vida, o companheiro que eu escolho todos os dias estar ao lado e que eu amo mais e mais. Dedico, ainda, à minha mãe, Carmen Lúcia, sempre presente, que me deixou as maiores lições de vida, entre elas a do amor incondicional. Ao meu pai pelo apoio de sempre. Aos meus irmãos, Gabriela, Júnior e Reginaldo e, em especial à minha sobrinha Naia, que chegou às vésperas do término desta pesquisa, ensolarando nossos dias. Dedico também aos meus amados sobrinhos, Neto, Luigi, Papito, Andrezinho e Ângela por serem tão especiais, alegrarem tanto a minha vida e por perdoarem minhas recentes ausências durante a elaboração deste trabalho. Dedico, por fim, aos meus primos-irmãos, Letícia e Douglas, por todo o amor, carinho e respeito. 4 Agradecimentos A CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) pela concessão da bolsa durante a realização deste Doutorado, conforme Processo nº 88887.148664/2017-00 A FUNDASP (Fundação São Paulo) pelo apoio durante o período do Doutorado. 5 Agradecimentos Ao meu orientador, Dr. Gilson Delgado Miranda, pela confiança e carinho, durante todo o decorrer do Doutorado. À todas as professoras e professores que me guiaram na atividade docente. Às minhas amigas Helga, Carla e Evelin, por essa amizade tão doada e por serem sempre inspirações para mim. A toda minha família e amigos que sempre me apoiaram em todas as jornadas e de quem estive não tão perto quanto gostaria. 6 Queremos saber O que vão fazer Com as novas invenções Queremos notícia mais séria Sobre a descoberta da antimatéria E suas implicações Na emancipação do homem Das grandes populações Homens pobres das cidades Das estepes, dos sertões Queremos saber Quando vamos ter Raio laser mais barato Queremos de fato um relato Retrato mais sério Do mistério da luz Luz do disco-voador Pra iluminação do homem Tão carente e sofredor Tão perdido na distância Da morada do Senhor Queremos saber Queremos viver Confiantes no futuro Por isso de faz necessário Prever qual o itinerário da ilusão a ilusão do poder pois se foi permitido ao homem tantas coisas conhecer é melhor que todos saibam o que pode acontecer queremos saber queremos saber todos queremos saber Queremos saber – Gilberto Gil 7 RESUMO O presente trabalho trata da falta de transparência do buscador Google, analisando-se quais os direitos dos consumidores usuários desse serviço são afetados, bem como o prejuízo causado ao equilíbrio do meio ambiente digital. A captação de dados e informações que circulam nas mais diferentes páginas, programas e aplicativos pertencentes às grandes corporações da rede está cada vez mais refinada e menos transparente. Além disso, o acesso aos dados e informações já existentes está sendo cada vez mais filtrado e direcionado para parceiros, anunciantes, de formas mais ou menos explícitas, dependendo do serviço prestado ou da página acessada. Desta forma, o tratamento que se deve reservar ao meio ambiente digital deve começar pela imediata e plena universalização do acesso à internet e aos seus dados em favor de todos, sem distinção ou privilégios, exclusões ou exceções, bem como pela transparência dos algoritmos que operam na rede através do aprendizado de máquina e outras formas de inteligência artificial, sob pena de, em não o sendo, autorizar os prejudicados pela inação estatal e/ou pela ação da especulação capitalista, a tomar as medidas administrativas e judiciais cabíveis e aplicáveis à espécie para a efetivação de seus direitos. A metodologia empregada valeu-se de revisão bibliográfica para análise dos dados obtidos, com a coleta de documentos textuais como: legislações, jurisprudências, doutrina pertinente, e publicações de caráter técnico, bem como análise de parte dos termos de uso e de políticas de dados do Google, a fim de se constatar a falta de transparência e o desrespeito aos direitos humanos e direitos do consumidor brasileiros e auxiliar na compreensão da problemática da mercantilização e parcialidade dos meios de comunicação digital. Os resultados da pesquisa indicaram que a legislação já existente é suficiente para a proteção dos consumidores usuários do serviço do buscador Google em diversos aspectos; entretanto, considera a possibilidade de uma nova legislação de proteção de dados como mais uma estratégia dentro do direito para a proteção dos direitos humanos à comunicar-se. Palavras-chave: Transparência. Buscador Google. Direito do consumidor. Meio ambiente digital. Internet. Usuário da internet. 8 ABSTRACT The present work deals with the lack of transparency of the Google search engine, analyzing what the rights of consumers users of this service are affected, as well as the damage caused to the balance of the digital environment. The capture of data and information circulating in the most different pages, programs and applications belonging to the large corporations of the network is increasingly refined and less transparent. In addition, access to existing data and information is increasingly being filtered and directed to partners, advertisers, in more or less explicit ways, depending on the service provided or the page accessed. In this way, the treatment that must be reserved for the digital environment must begin with the immediate and full universalization of Internet access and its data in favor of all without distinction or privileges, exclusions or exceptions, as well as the transparency of the algorithms that operate in the network through machine learning and other forms of artificial intelligence, under penalty of not authorizing those harmed by state inaction and / or by the action of capitalist speculation, to take the administrative and judicial measures applicable and applicable to the species for the realization of their rights. The methodology used was based on a bibliographic review to analyze the data obtained, with the collection of textual documents such as: legislation, jurisprudence, relevant doctrine, and publications of a technical nature, as well as an analysis of some of the terms of use and data policies of Google, in order to verify the lack of transparency and disrespect for human rights and Brazilian consumer rights and help in understanding the problem of commercialization and bias of the digital media. The results of the research indicated that the existing legislation is sufficient for the protection of consumers users of the Google search service in several aspects; however, considers the possibility of new data protection legislation as one more strategy within the law for the protection of human rights to communicate. Keywords: Transparency. Google search engine. Consumer law. Digital environment. Internet. User of the internet. 9 SUMÁRIO INTRODUÇÃO ..............................................................................................................13 1 O MEIO AMBIENTE DIGITAL E A REDE COMO ESPAÇOS LIVRES: APRESENTANDO ALGUNS AXIOMAS ...................................................................16 1.1 O controle social, o biopoder e a sociedade de controle ........................................16 1.2 O ciberespaço e o meio ambiente digital: conceitos básicos ..................................30 1.2.1 Ciberespaço ...........................................................................................................30 1.2.2 Meio ambiente .......................................................................................................33
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internet Hall of Fame Announces 2013 Inductees
    Internet Hall of Fame Announces 2013 Inductees Influential engineers, activists, and entrepreneurs changed history through their vision and determination Ceremony to be held 3 August in Berlin, Germany [Washington, D.C. and Geneva, Switzerland -- 26 June 2013] The Internet Society today announced the names of the 32 individuals who have been selected for induction into the Internet Hall of Fame. Honored for their groundbreaking contributions to the global Internet, this year’s inductees comprise some of the world’s most influential engineers, activists, innovators, and entrepreneurs. The Internet Hall of Fame celebrates Internet visionaries, innovators, and leaders from around the world who believed in the design and potential of an open Internet and, through their work, helped change the way we live and work today. The 2013 Internet Hall of Fame inductees are: Pioneers Circle – Recognizing individuals who were instrumental in the early design and development of the Internet: David Clark, David Farber, Howard Frank, Kanchana Kanchanasut, J.C.R. Licklider (posthumous), Bob Metcalfe, Jun Murai, Kees Neggers, Nii Narku Quaynor, Glenn Ricart, Robert Taylor, Stephen Wolff, Werner Zorn Innovators – Recognizing individuals who made outstanding technological, commercial, or policy advances and helped to expand the Internet’s reach: Marc Andreessen, John Perry Barlow, Anne-Marie Eklund Löwinder, François Flückiger, Stephen Kent, Henning Schulzrinne, Richard Stallman, Aaron Swartz (posthumous), Jimmy Wales Global Connectors – Recognizing individuals from around the world who have made significant contributions to the global growth and use of the Internet: Karen Banks, Gihan Dias, Anriette Esterhuysen, Steven Goldstein, Teus Hagen, Ida Holz, Qiheng Hu, Haruhisa Ishida (posthumous), Barry Leiner (posthumous), George Sadowsky “This year’s inductees represent a group of people as diverse and dynamic as the Internet itself,” noted Internet Society President and CEO Lynn St.
    [Show full text]
  • How Innovation Works a Bright Future Not All Innovation Is Speeding up the Innovation Famine China’S Innovation Engine Regaining Momentum
    Dedication For Felicity Bryan Contents Cover Title Page Dedication Introduction: The Infinite Improbability Drive 1. Energy Of heat, work and light What Watt wrought Thomas Edison and the invention business The ubiquitous turbine Nuclear power and the phenomenon of disinnovation Shale gas surprise The reign of fire 2. Public health Lady Mary’s dangerous obsession Pasteur’s chickens The chlorine gamble that paid off How Pearl and Grace never put a foot wrong Fleming’s luck The pursuit of polio Mud huts and malaria Tobacco and harm reduction 3. Transport The locomotive and its line Turning the screw Internal combustion’s comeback The tragedy and triumph of diesel The Wright stuff International rivalry and the jet engine Innovation in safety and cost 4. Food The tasty tuber How fertilizer fed the world Dwarfing genes from Japan Insect nemesis Gene editing gets crisper Land sparing versus land sharing 5. Low-technology innovation When numbers were new The water trap Crinkly tin conquers the Empire The container that changed trade Was wheeled baggage late? Novelty at the table The rise of the sharing economy 6. Communication and computing The first death of distance The miracle of wireless Who invented the computer? The ever-shrinking transistor The surprise of search engines and social media Machines that learn 7. Prehistoric innovation The first farmers The invention of the dog The (Stone Age) great leap forward The feast made possible by fire The ultimate innovation: life itself 8. Innovation’s essentials Innovation is gradual Innovation is different from invention Innovation is often serendipitous Innovation is recombinant Innovation involves trial and error Innovation is a team sport Innovation is inexorable Innovation’s hype cycle Innovation prefers fragmented governance Innovation increasingly means using fewer resources rather than more 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected]
    Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected] 12 June 2018 Mr President, Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive Threatens the Internet As a group of the Internet’s original architects and pioneers and their successors, we write to you as a matter of urgency about an imminent threat to the future of this global network. The European Commission’s proposal for Article 13 of the proposed Directive for Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive was well-intended. As creators ourselves, we share the concern that there should be a fair distribution of revenues from the online use of copyright works, that benefits creators, publishers, and platforms alike. But Article 13 is not the right way to achieve this. By requiring Internet platforms to perform automatic filtering all of the content that their users upload, Article 13 takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the Internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users. Europe has been served well by the balanced liability model established under the Ecommerce Directive, under which those who upload content to the Internet bear the principal responsibility for its legality, while platforms are responsible to take action to remove such content once its illegality has been brought to their attention. By inverting this liability model and essentially making platforms directly responsible for ensuring the legality of content in the first instance, the business models and investments of platforms large and small will be impacted. The damage that this may do to the free and open Internet as we know it is hard to predict, but in our opinions could be substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • Final List of Participants
    Final list of participants 1) States and European Community 2) Entities and intergovernmental organizations having received a Standing invitation from the United Nations General Assembly 3) United Nations Secretariat and Organs 4) United Nations Specialized Agencies 5) Associate Members of Regional Commissions 6) Other invited intergovernmental organizations 7) Non governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society organizations 8) Business Sector Entities 1) STATES AND EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Afghanistan Representatives: H.E. Mr Mohammad M. STANEKZAI, Ministre des Communications, Afghanistan, [email protected] H.E. Mr Shamsuzzakir KAZEMI, Ambassadeur, Representant permanent, Mission permanente de l'Afghanistan, [email protected] Mr Abdelouaheb LAKHAL, Representative, Delegation of Afghanistan Mr Fawad Ahmad MUSLIM, Directeur de la technologie, Ministère des affaires étrangères, [email protected] Mr Mohammad H. PAYMAN, Président, Département de la planification, Ministère des communications, [email protected] Mr Ghulam Seddiq RASULI, Deuxième secrétaire, Mission permanente de l'Afghanistan, [email protected] Albania Representatives: Mr Vladimir THANATI, Ambassador, Permanent Mission of Albania, [email protected] Ms Pranvera GOXHI, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Albania, [email protected] Mr Lulzim ISA, Driver, Mission Permanente d'Albanie, [email protected] Algeria Representatives: H.E. Mr Amar TOU, Ministre, Ministère de la poste et des technologies
    [Show full text]
  • A Deference to Protocol: Fashioning a Three-Dimensional Public Policy Framework for the Internet Age
    Whitt_Galley_7.11_FINAL (Do Not Delete) 7/12/2013 4:48 PM A DEFERENCE TO PROTOCOL: FASHIONING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PUBLIC POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR THE INTERNET AGE RICHARD S. WHITT* Abstract This Article discusses how public policy grounded in the Internet’s architecture can best ensure that the Net fully enables tangible benefits such as innovation, economic growth, free expression, and user empowerment. In particular, recognizing that the Internet is rapidly becoming society’s chief operating system, this Article shows how an overarching public policy framework should be faithful to the multifaceted nature of the online world. As part of such a framework, this Article will explore one key aspect of the Internet: the “logical” Middle Layers functions, its inner workings derived from open software protocols and inclusive, decentralized processes. Adhering to the deferential principle of “respect the functional integrity of the Internet,” in combination with the appropriate institutional and organizational implements, can help ensure that any potential regulation of Internet- based activities enables, rather than hinders, tangible and intangible benefits for end users. In brief, optimal public policy solutions can come from fitting the correct Code (Net target) to the most effective Rules (institutions) and Players (organizations). I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 691 A. No Nerds Allowed ............................................................ 691 B. Accepting Kingdon’s Challenge
    [Show full text]
  • Framing the Net - How Discourse Shapes Law and Culture
    Framing the Net - How Discourse Shapes Law and Culture PhD dissertation submitted at Roskilde University Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies September 2011, Copenhagen By Rikke Frank Jørgensen 2 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Danish Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Key Research Notions................................................................................................................................................ 10 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................. 12 1. MOTIVATION AND RESEARCH AIM ................................................................................ 14 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 16 Research Design ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Philosophical Foundation ................................................................................................................................................... 18 The Notion of Metaphors
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Governance
    INTERNET GOVERNANCE: CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL The Fourth Internet Governance Forum Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt 15-18 November 2009 Edited by William J. Drake Файл загружен с http://www.ifap.ru Copyright © 2010 United Nations All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, the reproduction or utilization of this work or part of it in any form or by electronics, or other means now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, recording, and in any information storage, transmission or retrieval system, including CD-ROM, online or via the Internet, is forbidden without the written permission of the publishers. The views expressed in this book are those of their individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the United Nations, any of its organs or agencies, nor of any other organizations or institutions mentioned or discussed in this book, including the organizations to which the authors are affiliated. Published by The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. One United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017 ------------ United Nations Publication Sales No. E.10.II.A.15 ISBN 978-92-1-104612-0 Table of Contents Message by Sha Zukang, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs...................................................................................... i I. Introductions The Third IGF Book Markus Kummer………………….....…………………...………………………... iii The Fourth IGF Meeting Nitin Desai…..……………………………………………………………..………. vi Editor’s Introduction William J. Drake…………..……………………………….………………………. ix II. Background Papers Critical Internet Resources: Coping with the Elephant in the Room Jeanette Hofmann…………………………………………………………………... 1 Openness: Protecting Internet Freedoms Olga Cavalli………………………...……………………………………………… 15 Diversity: Achieving an Internet that is Really for All Hong Xue…………………………………………………………………..……….
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS a GLOBAL FRAMEWORK for CYBER PEACE and DIGITAL COOPERATION: an AGENDA for the 2020S Edited by Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Matthias C
    TOWARDS A GLOBAL FRAMEWORK FOR CYBER PEACE AND DIGITAL COOPERATION: AN AGENDA FOR THE 2020s edited by Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Matthias C. Kettemann and Max Senges with Katharina Mosene Prefaces by António Guterres, UN Secretary-General, and the “Father of the Internet”, Vint Cerf Internet Governance Forum Berlin 25–29 November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME MESSAGE 8 | Thomas Jarzombek: An excellent vademecum for the participants at this year’s IGF. PREFACES 10 | António Guterres: Internet governance must lead to policies that improve lives. 12 | Vint Cerf: An Agenda for the Next Decade 16 | INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROLOG 22 | Melinda Gates & Jack Ma: Statements on the UN High Level Panel on Digital Cooperation 25 | Jovan Kurbalija: From digital independence to digital interdependence 31 | Matthias C. Kettemann, Wolfgang Kleinwächter & Max Senges: Implementing Sustainable Digital Cooperation: Towards a #NextGenerationInternetGovernance for the 2020s PART 1: STAKEHOLDERS GOVERNMENT 47 | Houlin Zaho: Strengthening Digital Cooperation: The Future is Now 50 | Uri Rosenthal: Once upon a time ... in cyberspace 54 | Marina Kaljurand: From IGF to IGF+ 57 | Virgilio Almeida: Evaluating digital governance strategies 60 | Thomas Schneider: A vision, values, principles and mechanisms for cooperation and governance fit for purpose for the digital age 64 | Peter Major: Digital Governance 3 67 | Manal Ismail: ICANNs multistakeholder-model and the Internet ACADEMIC COMMUNITY Governance Ecosystem 115 | Jonathan Zittrain: Three Eras of Digital
    [Show full text]
  • The Apc Ict Policy Handbook
    The APC ICT Policy Handbook THE ASSOCIatION FOR PROGRESIVE COMMUNICatIONS The APC ICT Policy Handbook Editor David Souter With contributions from David Souter, Peter da Costa, Avri Doria, Lisa Horner, Gus Hosein, Heike Jensen, Mike Jensen, Achal Prabhala and Dmitri Vitaliev The Association for Progressive Communications - www.apc.org The APC ICT Policy Handbook Editor David Souter Contributors David Souter Peter da Costa Avri Doria Lisa Horner Gus Hosein Heike Jensen Mike Jensen Achal Prabhala Dmitri Vitaliev Project coordination Natasha Primo Publication production Karen Higgs Proofreading Lori Nordstrom Graphic design Monocromo Cover illustration Matias Bervejillo This publication was made possible thanks to support from: United Kingdom Directorate-General for Department for International International Cooperation Development (DFID) of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DGIS) The apc Ict Policy Handbook Published by APC 2009 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence <creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/> Some rights reserved. ISBN 92-95049-73-X APC-200911-CIPP-R-EN-P-0065 Contents About this handbook / 4 Section 5 The internet Section 1 Chapter 18: Internet technology Main themes and networks / 113 Chapter 1: Why ICTs and ICT policies matter / 7 Chapter 19: Internet services / 121 Chapter 2: Information and communications: Chapter 20: Internet development An overview / 11 and governance / 129 Chapter 3: Information and communications Chapter 21: Internet policy issues / 138 technologies / 14 Section 6 Chapter 4: Information
    [Show full text]
  • WSIS) - Update 5 Dec 2005
    List of participants (WSIS) - Update 5 Dec 2005 1) STATES AND EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Afghanistan Representatives: H.E. Mr Amirzai SANGEEN, Minister Of Communication, Delegation Of Afghanistan Mr Fawad MUSLIM, Chief Of Communication & Archive, Delegation Of Afghanistan Mr Aimal MARJAN, Ministry Of Communication, Delegation Of Afghanistan Mr Schahan SEDIQI, Advisor To President Office, Delegation Of Afghanistan, [email protected] Albania Representatives: Mr Armand TELITI, Deputy Minister Of Public Works, Transport And Telecommunication, Delegation Of Albania Mr Elvin MËHILLI, Adviser To The Minister Of Public Works, Transport And Telecommunication, Delegation Of Albania Mr Lorenc XHAFERRAJ, Desk Officer, Un Department, Ministry Of Foreign Affairs, Delegation Of Albania, [email protected] Algeria H.E. Mr Abdelaziz BOUTEFLIKA, Président de la République algérienne démocratique et populaire, , Representatives: H.E. Mr Mohamed BEDJAOUI, Ministre d'Etat Ministre des Affaires Etrangères, Delegation of Algeria, [email protected] H.E. Mr Haichour BOUDJEMAA, Ministre de la Poste et des technologies de l'information, Delegation of Algeria, [email protected] H.E. Mr Mustapha BOUTEFLIKA, Conseiller auprès de Monsieur le Président De La République, Présidence de la République, [email protected] H.E. Mr Saïd BOUTEFLIKA, Conseiller auprès de Monsieur le Président De La République, Présidence de la République, [email protected] H.E. Mr Djamel KEHAL, Directeur de la Sécurité et de la protection présidentielles, Présidence de la République, [email protected] H.E. Mr Abdelaziz MAOUI, Ambassadeur, Delegation of Algeria, [email protected] H.E. Mr Mokhtar REGUIEG, Directeur Général du Protocole, Présidence de la République, [email protected] H.E. Mr Abdellatif REHAL, Conseiller Diplomatique auprès de Monsieur le Président De La République, Delegation of Algeria, [email protected] H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet As a Catalyst for Change: Access, Development, Freedoms and Innovation
    INTERNET AS A CATALYST FOR CHANGE: ACCESS, DEVELOPMENT, FREEDOMS AND INNOVATION The Sixth Internet Governance Forum Nairobi, Kenya 27-30 September 2011 IGF 2011 - 'Internet as a catalyst for change: access, development, freedoms and innovation' The Sixth Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum Nairobi, Kenya 27-30 September 2011 Edited by Brian Gutterman Table of Contents I. Introductions Foreword by Alice Munyua, Chair, 2011 Internet Governance Forum …………..1 Editor’s Introduction………………………………………………………………4 Editorial Approach………………………………………………………………...4 About the Book……………………………………………………………………5 Programme for the 2011 Meeting…………………………………………………6 II. Chair’s Summary Chair’s Summary…………………………………………………………………24 III. Proceedings Internet Governance for Development Report of the Main Session………………………………………………………40 Reports of the Workshops………………………………………………………..62 Opening Ceremony……………………………………………………………..93 Opening Session………………………………………………………………..105 Emerging Issues Report of the Main Session……………………………………………………..128 Reports of the Workshops………………………………………………………148 Access and Diversity Report of the Main Session……………………………………………………..197 Reports of the Workshops………………………………………………………220 Security, Openness and Privacy Report of the Main Session……………………………………………………..263 Reports of the Workshops………………………………………………………292 Managing Critical Internet Resources Report of the Main Session …………………………………………………….362 Reports of the Workshops ……………………………………………………...389 Taking Stock and the Way Forward Report of the Main Session …………………………………………………….423 Reports
    [Show full text]