DOCSLIB.ORG

Endocranial Volume and Brain Growth in Immature Neandertals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Endocranial Volume and Brain Growth in Immature Neandertals See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40853229 Endocranial volume and brain growth in immature Neandertals Article in Periodicum Biologorum · January 2007 Source: OAI CITATIONS READS 23 211 2 authors: Hélène Coqueugniot Jean-Jacques Hublin French National Centre for Scientific Research Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology 198 PUBLICATIONS 1,237 CITATIONS 515 PUBLICATIONS 20,418 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Etude anthropologique de La Granède (Millau) View project Micro-CT Analysis of Interglobular Dentine View project All content following this page was uploaded by Hélène Coqueugniot on 04 July 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 109, No 4, 379–385, 2007 CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362 Original scientific paper Endocranial Volume and Brain Growth in Immature Neandertals Abstract HÉLÈNE COQUEUGNIOT1,2 JEAN-JACQUES HUBLIN1 Microstructural studies have suggested that an extended period of growth 1 was absent in representatives of Homo erectus, and that Neandertals Department of Human Evolution reached adulthood significantly more rapidly than modern humans. In Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology addition to general rate of growth, a prolonged postnatal period of brain Deutscher Platz 6 development allows humans to develop complex cognitive and social skills. 04103 Leipzig, Germany Conditions in brain growth similar to those observed in extant humans were E-mail: [email protected] not established in the first representatives of Homo erectus. To assess the 2UMR 5199 – PACEA, Laboratoire degree of secondary altriciality reached by Neandertals, we examined the d’Anthropologie most complete skulls available for immature Neandertal specimens. The des Populations du Passé, Université endocranial volumes were evaluated by using equations based on external Bordeaux 1 cranial measurements. The proportional endocranial volumes (PEV) of Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence cedex, these fossils were compared to the PEV of known age modern children from France E-mail: Western Europe and to a developmental series of Pan troglodytes.We [email protected] present an estimation of the cranial capacity of Krapina 1. Although Neandertal children are close to the modern variation, the position of the youngest specimens in the upper range of variation led us to propose that Key words: Krapina 1, Neandertals, Neandertals may have displayed a slightly more primitive pattern with endocranial volume, secondary altriciality, respect to the speed of brain growth. brain, growth and development GENERAL RATE OF GROWTH umans differ from other primates in their development pattern Hand particularly in the marked lengthening of their growth pro- cesses. These differences have a number of implications, not only in biological terms, but also in terms of social organization, mating strate- gies, and an extension of the learning period. However, to date, the precise point when a modern growth pattern was established during the course of human evolution still remains obscure. Dental and so- matic growth are highly correlated across the primate order (1–4). Thus, advances on the issue of differences in life history between hominin species result primarily from an emphasis placed on dental development and, more specifically, microstructural studies. Recent reassessments of the life history in extinct hominins based on dental studies suggest significant differences in the timing of individual de- velopment (5, 6). Based on the analysis of the enamel apposition rate, Dean et al. (5) established that an enlarged period of growth was absent in representatives of Australopithecus and early Homo, and specifically Received June 1, 2007. Homo erectus. These species more closely align with extant apes than with recent humans. Hélène Coqueugniot and J.-J. Hublin Brain growth in Neandertals A long-standing controversy surrounds the question absolute size of the brain for a relatively long time after of whether Neandertals shared the prolonged growth birth. periods of modern humans. Dean et al. (5) suggested that This phenomenon is invoked to explain some unique Neandertals would be at the »fastest« end of modern aspects of brain growth in human children compared to human variation, and two opposing schemas involving other primates. In most primates, brain size reaches a rates of development have recently been proposed for this high proportion of the final adult size before birth (70% fossil group. Ramirez Rozzi and Bermúdez de Castro in macaques, for example) and brain growth slows ra- (6) established that Neandertals reached adulthood sig- pidly after birth (11). An intermediate situation is found nificantly more quickly than modern humans. Accord- in the common chimpanzee, where 45% of the adult size ing to these authors, a short crown formation time in is reached at birth, and 80% of the adult volume is Neandertals indicates that somatic development was not reached by the end of the first year. In humans at birth, as long as in Homo sapiens. The Neandertal anterior brain size is on average only 25% of the adult size and a teeth grew in about 15% less time than those of Upper high fetal growth rate is sustained a full year after birth. Paleolithic-Mesolithic Homo sapiens. Neandertals would At one year of age, the brain is still around only 50% of its therefore have taken approximately 15 years to reach adult size, and it is not before 8 years that it reaches 90% adulthood. Similar conclusions had been reached by ot- (14). A re-sampling method and a large data set (15) her authors some years before through observations on a provide further evidence for our conclusions that humans very limited number of specimens (7). In contrast, Gua- and chimpanzees do not achieve the same proportion of telli-Steinberg et al. (8) have challenged these results, brain growth in utero. Using brain weights, the results suggesting instead that Neandertals did not reach adult- obtained by Desilva and Lesnik (15) differ from what we hood any more quickly than do modern humans. Spe- obtained on endocranial capacity by only a few percent. cifically, they found that Neandertal imbricational ena- This has been confirmed again by the compilation of mel formation times were not faster than those of a living many measurements by Alemseged et al. (16). English population. Post-natal volume increase in humans is an outcome Ramirez Rozzi and Bermúdez de Castro (6) proposed primarily of the development of white matter resulting that Neandertals followed a reverse evolutionary trend from the development and maturation of cerebral con- towards faster dental growth because they differ from nections. Most of this development takes place in the other hominins such as Homo antecessor, Homo heidel- complex extra-maternal environment while the indivi- bergensis and even more so in Homo sapiens with respect dual is already interacting with its surroundings, and the to dental maturation. In their view, this is dependent on way that the human brain grows has important conse- brain/body size constraints. quences in the development of cognitive and social skills. This difference in somatic growth would be consis- During normal ontogeny, there is an extended period tent with previous work that has suggested that characte- of development, during which synapses are retained or ristic differences in cranial and mandibular shape be- eliminated in response to sensory stimulation or motor tween Neandertals and modern humans arose very early activity.Abnormally accelerated brain growth in humans in development (9). On the contrary, Guatelli-Steinberg results in a severe impairment of cognitive skills, and a et al. (8) concluded that, if anterior tooth crown formation dramatic growth spurt in the first year of life leads to periods reflect overall growth periods, then by extension, social and cognitive impairments, as suggested by Cour- Neandertal somatic growth appears to be encompassed chesne et al. (17) in their studies of children affected by within the modern human range of interpopulation va- severe autism. riation. Determining the time of emergence of a modern pat- tern of secondary altriciality in the course of human SECONDARY ALTRICIALITY evolution is therefore of great interest and this question has been extensively debated. One main problem in as- In addition to general rate of growth, another im- sessing this issue results from the fact that we can rely portant aspect of human growth is referred to as »secon- only on cross-sectional studies, and that adult brain size dary altriciality« (10, 11). Humans differ from other displays large degrees of variation, which may be even primates not only in their extended growth period, but more marked in species displaying high levels of sexual also in the relative speed of development of their brain dimorphism. In addition to the uncertainty resulting when compared to speed of development in the rest of from the evaluation of the calendar age at death of im- the body. Because the brain represents a very »expensive mature individuals, their proportional brain size can be tissue« in terms of physiological costs (12), its size at birth computed only relative to a mean of the known adults. is likely constrained by the basal metabolism of the mot- This results in an artificial increase in the observed varia- her (11). In addition, the pelvis size and morphology are bility and overlap between taxa. Computations based on also strongly constrained in bipedal hominins (13). As a the immature Australopithecus africanus from Taung,South result the size of the brain at birth has been under a strong Africa suggest that it conforms to an ape model. Recent selection pressure in recent human evolution and the evidence from the description of the Dikika juvenile increase of adult brain size in recent hominins was made Australopithecus afarensis (16), however, suggests large possible only by extending the rapid fetal increase of the possible variability, if not an intermediate situation be- 380 Period biol, Vol 109, No 4, 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nasal Floor Variation Among Eastern Eurasian Pleistocene Homo Xiu-Jie WU1, Scott D
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCE Vol. 120(3), 217–226, 2012 Nasal floor variation among eastern Eurasian Pleistocene Homo Xiu-Jie WU1, Scott D. MADDUX2, Lei PAN1,3, Erik TRINKAUS4* 1Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, People’s Republic of China 2Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA 3Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China 4Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA Received 28 March 2012; accepted 9 July 2012 Abstract A bi-level nasal floor, although present in most Pleistocene and recent human samples, reaches its highest frequency among the western Eurasian Neandertals and has been considered a fea- ture distinctive of them. Early modern humans, in contrast, tend to feature a level (or sloping) nasal floor. Sufficiently intact maxillae are rare among eastern Eurasian Pleistocene humans, but several fos- sils provide nasal floor configurations. The available eastern Eurasian Late Pleistocene early modern humans have predominantly level nasal floors, similar to western early modern humans. Of the four observable eastern Eurasian archaic Homo maxillae (Sangiran 4, Chaoxian 1, Xujiayao 1, and Chang- yang 1), three have the bi-level pattern and the fourth is scored as bi-level/sloping. It therefore appears that bi-level nasal floors were common among Pleistocene archaic humans, and a high frequency of them is not distinctive of the Neandertals. Key words: noses, maxilla, Asia, palate, Neandertal Introduction dominate with the bi-level configuration being present in ≤10% in all but a sub-Saharan African “Bantu” sample In his descriptions of the Shanidar Neandertal crania, (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Science Journals
    RESEARCH ◥ that paper, and the average of the listed cranial TECHNICAL COMMENT capacities should have been 1468.7 cc, not 1494 cc. Additionally, using values from Holloway et al.(7) for those Neandertals would result in an average PALEOANTHROPOLOGY cranial capacity of 1438.3 cc. A third value of 1498 cc, based on Holloway et al., is used to generate the consensus average (1). In Holloway et al., an aver- Comment on “The growth pattern age for Homo sapiens neanderthalensis is reported as 1487.5 ml in appendix I and 1427.2 ml in appendix II. The 1427.2-ml value is almost identical of Neandertals, reconstructed (1428 ml) to the average of reported adult values in the text of Holloway et al. However, Holloway et al. from a juvenile skeleton from also attribute fossils typically assigned to Homo sapiens [Jebel Ihroud (n =2)andSkhul(n =4)]to El Sidrón (Spain)” Neandertals. When these are removed, the average Neandertal adult cranial capacity in Holloway et al. Jeremy M. DeSilva is 1414.8 ml. Given these problems with the values used to generate the consensus average of cranial Rosas et al. (Reports, 22 September 2017, p. 1282) calculate El Sidrón J1 to have capacity in adult Neandertals, it is necessary to reached only 87.5% of its adult brain size. This finding is based on an overestimation recalculate the likely percentage of adult brain size achieved by the El Sidrón juvenile. of Neandertal brain size. Pairwise comparisons with a larger sample of Neandertal Downloaded from fossils reveal that it is unlikely that the brain of El Sidrón would have grown When all adult crania assigned to Neandertals n appreciably larger.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neandertal Lower Right Deciduous Second Molar from Trou De L•Abime
    Journal of Human Evolution 58 (2010) 56–67 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol The Neandertal lower right deciduous second molar from Trou de l’Abıˆme at Couvin, Belgium Michel Toussaint a,*, Anthony J. Olejniczak b, Sireen El Zaatari b, Pierre Cattelain c, Damien Flas d, Claire Letourneux b,Ste´phane Pirson e a Direction de l’Arche´ologie, Service Public de Wallonie, 1 rue des Brigades d’Irlande, B-5100 Namur, Belgium b Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany c Muse´e du Malgre´-Tout and CEDARC, rue de la Gare, 28, B-5670 Treignes, Belgium d Muse´es royaux d’Art et d’Histoire, parc du Cinquantenaire, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium e Direction de l’Arche´ologie, Service Public de Wallonie, 1 rue des Brigades d’Irlande, B-5100 Namur and Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 29 rue Vautier, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium article info abstract Article history: A human lower right deciduous second molar was discovered in 1984 at the entrance of Trou de Received 13 June 2008 l’Abıˆme at Couvin (Belgium). In subsequent years the interpretation of this fossil remained difficult for Accepted 11 August 2009 various reasons: (1) the lack of taxonomically diagnostic elements which would support its attribution to either Homo (sapiens) neanderthalensis or H. s. sapiens; (2) the absence of any reliable chronostratigraphic Keywords: interpretation of the sedimentary sequence of the site; (3) the contradiction between archaeological Middle Palaeolithic interpretations, which attributed the lithic industry to a transitional facies between the Middle and Early Enamel thickness Upper Palaeolithic, and the radiocarbon date of 46,820 Æ 3,290 BP obtained from animal bone remains Neandertals Couvin associated with the tooth and the flint tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyasi 1 and the Suprainiac Fossa. AJPA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 124:28–32 (2004) Eyasi 1 and the Suprainiac Fossa Erik Trinkaus* Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 KEY WORDS human paleontology; Africa; cranium; occipital; Pleistocene ABSTRACT A reexamination of Eyasi 1, a later Mid- considered to be uniquely derived for the European and dle Pleistocene east African neurocranium, reveals the western Asian Neandertals. These observations therefore presence of a suite of midoccipital features, including a indicate that these features are not limited to Neandertal modest nuchal torus that is limited to the middle half of lineage specimens, and should be assessed in terms of the bone, the absence of an external occipital protuber- frequency distributions among later archaic humans. Am ance, and a distinct transversely oval suprainiac fossa. J Phys Anthropol 124:28–32, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. These features, and especially the suprainiac fossa, were In the late 1970s, following on the work of earlier cene specimens normally included within the Nean- scholars (e.g., Schwalbe, 1901; Klaatsch, 1902; Gor- dertal group. The degree of development of the su- janovic´-Kramberger, 1902; Weidenreich, 1940; prainiac fossa among Near Eastern mature remains Patte, 1955), it was proposed by Hublin (1978a,b) is more variable (Trinkaus, 1983; Condemi, 1992), and Santa Luca (1978) that a combination of exter- but the other features appear to characterize that nal features of the posteromiddle of the occipital group as well. Furthermore, as noted above, at least bone (or iniac region) of the European and western the suprainiac fossa has been shown to appear early Asian Neandertals was unique to, or uniquely de- in development among the Neandertals and their rived for, these Late Pleistocene late archaic hu- European predecessors (Hublin, 1980; Heim, 1982; mans.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Maxillary First Molar Occlusal Outlines of Neandertals from the Meuse River Basin of Belgium Using Elliptical Fourier Analysis
    Frank L’Engle Williams, Katherine M. Lane, William G. Anderson Anthropological Review • Vol. 80(3), 273–286 (2017) Comparison of maxillary first molar occlusal outlines of Neandertals from the Meuse River Basin of Belgium using elliptical Fourier analysis Frank L’Engle Williams, Katherine M. Lane, William G. Anderson Dental Microwear Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, USA ABSTRACT: Several Neandertals derive from the karstic caves of the Meuse river tributaries of Belgium, in- cluding Engis 2, Scladina 4A-4 and Spy 1. These may form a group that is distinct in maxillary first molar occlusal outlines compared to La Quina 5 from Southwest France. Alternatively, chronological differences may separate individuals given that Scladina 4A-4 from MIS 5 is older than the others from MIS 3. Neo- lithic samples (n = 42) from Belgium (Maurenne Caverne de la Cave, Hastière Caverne M, Hastière Trou Garçon, Sclaigneaux and Bois Madame) dated to 4.6–3.9 kyr provide a context for the Neandertals. Dental casts were prepared from dental impressions of the original maxillary molars. Crown and occlusal areas as well as mesiodistal lengths were measured by calibrated Motic 3.0 microscope cameras. Occlusal outlines of the casts were captured through photostereomicroscopy and non-landmark smooth tracing methods. Occlusal outlines were processed using elliptical Fourier analysis within SHAPE v1.3 which reduced am- plitudes of the harmonics into principal components (PC) axes. The first two PC axes group the Nean- dertals, although Scladina 4A-4 falls nearly outside the convex hull for the Neolithic sample. Neandertals are imperfectly separated from the Neolithic sample on PC3 and PC4, and completely distinct on PC5 and PC6.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Article
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 10852-10854, October 1996 Evolution Significance of some previously unrecognized apomorphies in the nasal region ofHomo neanderthalensis (Neanderthals/human evolution/nasal morphology) JEFFREY H. SCHWARTZ* AND IAN TATTERSALLt# *Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; and tDepartment of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024 Communicated by Elwyn L. Simons, Duke University Primate Center, Durham, NC, May 1, 1996 (received for review March 14, 1996) ABSTRACT For many years, the Neanderthals have been also clearly visible in published photographs of other Nean- recognized as a distinctive extinct hominid group that occu- derthals (e.g., Shanidar 1; see Figure 76 in ref. 4). pied Europe and western Asia between about 200,000 and Although the conchal crest of extant mammals (5, 6), 30,000 years ago. It is still debated, however, whether these including Homo sapiens (ref. 6; Fig. 2b), occurs in the same hominids belong in their own species, Homo neanderthalensis, general area within the nasal cavity as the medial prominence or represent an extinct variant of Homo sapiens. Our ongoing does in these Neanderthals, it arises farther back and is studies indicate that the Neanderthals differ from modern horizontal rather than vertical in orientation. It also differs humans in their skeletal anatomy in more ways than have been morphologically from the raised and bulky Neanderthal medial recognized up to now. The purpose of this contribution is to eminence in being low and relatively poorly defined. The describe specializations of the Neanderthal internal nasal human conchal crest is the anterior line of contact with the region that make them unique not only among hominids but nasal wall of the paper-thin inferior nasal concha, which arises possibly among terrestrial mammals in general as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Interbreeding in Late Italian Neanderthals?
    Possible Interbreeding in Late Italian Neanderthals? New Data from the Mezzena Jaw (Monti Lessini, Verona, Italy) Silvana Condémi, Aurélien Mounier, Paolo Giunti, Martina Lari, David Caramelli, Laura Longo To cite this version: Silvana Condémi, Aurélien Mounier, Paolo Giunti, Martina Lari, David Caramelli, et al.. Possible Interbreeding in Late Italian Neanderthals? New Data from the Mezzena Jaw (Monti Lessini, Verona, Italy). PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2013, 8 (3), pp.e59781. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059781. halshs-00849140 HAL Id: halshs-00849140 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00849140 Submitted on 19 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Possible Interbreeding in Late Italian Neanderthals? New Data from the Mezzena Jaw (Monti Lessini, Verona, Italy) Silvana Condemi1*, Aure´lien Mounier1,2, Paolo Giunti3, Martina Lari4, David Caramelli4, Laura Longo5* 1 UMR 7268 CNRS/Aix-Marseille Universite´/EFS ADES - Anthropologie bioculturelle,
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary and Behavioral Strategies Of
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2011 Dietary and Behavioral Strategies of Neandertals and Anatomically Modern Humans: Evidence from Anterior Dental Microwear Texture Analysis Kristin Lynn Krueger University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Krueger, Kristin Lynn, "Dietary and Behavioral Strategies of Neandertals and Anatomically Modern Humans: Evidence from Anterior Dental Microwear Texture Analysis" (2011). Theses and Dissertations. 92. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/92 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 DIETARY AND BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES OF NEANDERTALS AND ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMANS: EVIDENCE FROM ANTERIOR DENTAL MICROWEAR TEXTURE ANALYSIS DIETARY AND BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES OF NEANDERTALS AND ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMANS: EVIDENCE FROM ANTERIOR DENTAL MICROWEAR TEXTURE ANALYSIS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology By Kristin L. Krueger University of Wisconsin-Madison Bachelor of Science in Anthropology, 2003 University of Wisconsin-Madison Bachelor of Science in Spanish, 2003 Western Michigan University Master of Arts in Anthropology, 2006 May 2011 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT The extreme gross wear of Neandertal anterior teeth has been a topic of debate for decades. Several ideas have been proposed, including the excessive mastication of grit- laden foods and non-dietary anterior tooth use, or using the anterior dentition as a clamp or tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Neandertal Dental Microwear Texture Analysis: a Bioarchaeological Approach Jessica L. Droke
    Neandertal Dental Microwear Texture Analysis: A Bioarchaeological Approach Jessica L. Droke B. A., University of Tennessee: Knoxville, 2013 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Anthropology at the University of Indianapolis June 2017 Dr. Christopher W. Schmidt, Advisor To my parents, Ann and Thomas Shearon Who have loved me unconditionally and supported all my academic endeavors And To my partner, Kristen A. Broehl Who has been an endless source of encouragement, a world-class editor, and my biggest fan Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Christopher W. Schmidt for all of his guidance and support throughout this process and for allowing me to pursue such an ambitious and interesting project. Dr. Schmidt has been instrumental in helping to develop this approach and in bringing together the people and materials which made this study possible. I would like to thank Dr. Gregory A. Reinhardt for his advice and thoughtful edits throughout the writing process. I would also like to extend a special thanks Dr. Frank L’Engle Williams and Dr. John C. Willman for providing the Neandertal dental casts used in this study, their willingness to work cooperatively, and for their suggestions along the way. I would like to thank the graduate students in the Anthropology program at the University of Indianapolis, especially Rose L. Perash and Arysa Gonzalez- Romero, for their investment in this project since its inception and above all for their excellent friendship. I thank my family, particularly my parents Ann and Thomas Shearon, my sister Sarah Droke, and my grandmother Joanne Van Cleave for their support and encouragement during the pursuit of my academic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Shara Bailey.Pdf
    NEANDERTAL DENTAL MORPHOLOGY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN HUMAN ORIGINS by Shara Elaine Bailey A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2002 NEANDERTAL DENTAL MORPHOLOGY: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN HUMAN ORIGINS by Shara Elaine Bailey has been approved September 2002 APPROVED: , Chair Supervisory Committee ACCEPTED: ____________________________________ Department Chair ____________________________________ Dean, Graduate College ABSTRACT Research on Neandertal dentitions has been limited primarily to simple dental metrics, dental proportions and a few dental traits that seem to distinguish these from anatomically modern Homo sapiens (e.g., derived incisor morphology and taurodont molars). Consequently, Neandertal postcanine dental morphology has been generally assumed to be much like our own. This research examines this assumption through a systematic and comparative study of Neandertal postcanine dental morphology. Results are interpreted in light of two competing models for modern human origins: Multiregional Evolution (MRE) and Recent African Origin (RAO). Postcanine dental data were collected using the well-standardized methodology of the Arizona State University dental anthropology system. Additional dental traits were added by the author. Samples include individuals representing Homo erectus, archaic Homo sapiens, Neandertals, early anatomically modern Homo sapiens, Upper Paleolithic Europeans and seven recent human geographic populations. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, together with cladistic analysis, were used to make quantified assessments of Neandertal affinities. The results are inconsistent with predictions of the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis as it concerns Europe: phenetic analyses indicate that contemporary and Upper Paleolithic Europeans are among the groups least similar to Neandertals, and that there is no evidence of gradual evolution toward the modern human dental condition in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer #1: Remarks to the Author
    Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer #1: Remarks to the Author: I found this to be a valuable and overall convincing test of models concerning possible environmental influences on body and brain size evolution, particularly for the larger data sets available in the later part of the record. I have added just a few very minor comments to the attached files but my main concerns are with two aspects of the data sets. While there are clear indications of data sources for the body and ECV determinations, I could not see clear indications for dating of fossils (unless I missed them) in this submission or the referenced 2017 paper by some of the same authors. Chronological control is very important for a study like this and while some sites are well dated, others have only single determinations that may or may not closely relate to the fossils concerned, conflicts of chronology, or worse still just ‘guesstimates’ (e.g. Elandsfontein, Ndutu, Eliye Springs, the Gibraltar Neanderthals). So I’d like clear citations of sources for the age estimates used, and discussion of why particular dates have been preferred, where there are conflicts or guesstimates. In some cases such as Ngandong, Broken Hill, Saccopastore and Sunghir, there have also been recent publications with new age estimates that should be referenced. Additionally, it looks like some of the radiocarbon ages are calibrated while others are uncalibrated, and for correlation with environmental events, calibrated age estimates are essential. Again, this needs to be clearly shown and discussed. The second issue I have with the data set is the climatic record used.
    [Show full text]
  • Krapina 3: Cut Marks and Ritual Behavior?
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 108, No 4, 519–524, 2006 CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362 Original scientific paper Krapina 3: Cut Marks and Ritual Behavior? Abstract DAVID W. FRAYER1 JÖRG ORSCHIEDT2 Incisions on the frontal of the Krapina 3 cranium differ from other cut JILL COOK3 marks from the site. Thirty-five, mostly parallel marks course up the frontal MARY DORIA RUSSELL4 JAKOV RADOV^I]5 from right of the midline, just posterior to the supraorbitale point to left of the midline, slightly anterior to bregma. They are angled mostly perpendic- 1 Department of Anthropology ular to the midsagittal plane, averaging 5.2 mm in length and are on aver- University of Kansas age 1.2 mm apart. The marks' characteristics are not consistent with scalp- Lawrence, KS, USA 66045 ing, cannibalism, defleshing or other perimortem activities described for E-mail: [email protected] Neandertals or modern groups. These marks represent a type of funereal be- 2 Archaeologie, Historisches Centrum Hagen havior yet to be documented in Neandertals and suggest a kind of ritual Eilper Strasse 71–75 treatment of the deceased. 58091 Hagen, Germany 3 Head of Prehistory Department of Prehistory and Europe The British Museum INTRODUCTION London WC1B 3DG, UK one modifications attributed to cannibalism in fossil humans were 4 4083 Princeton Boulevard Brecorded at the Krapina Neandertal site in 1899 by Dragutin Cleveland Ohio 44121, USA Gorjanovi}-Kramberger. These observations were some of his first in- 5 Croatian Natural History Museum terpretations of the Neandertal bones from Krapina and the first, any- Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia where for cannibalism at a Neandertal site.
    [Show full text]