Volume I Fam Ilies & Dy Nastie S Joust a L’Outrance by Mark D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume I Fam Ilies & Dy Nastie S Joust a L’Outrance by Mark D The Family Volume I Fam ilies & Dy nastie s Joust a l’outrance by Mark D. Dennis In May 1390 during a truce in the long running state of war between Scotland and England, Sir David de Lindsay and the English baron, John de Welles, kept a pledge to joust a l’outrance, to the death, with pointed and edged weapons. Other Scots and English knights participated in the tournament held on London Bridge before King Richard II and his court. Lindsay, later first Earl Crawford, is shown in this interpretation at the point he unhorsed de Welles. They then fought on foot, and again de Lindsay prevailed. With Lord de WelIes’ life on the point of the Scot's dagger and the English king having declined to intervene to spare him, the chivalrous Sir David relented and helped the Englishman to his feet rather than slay him. The Scots carried the day and were presented with rich gifts by the English king. It was a medieval version of Twickenham. ii Contents Volume 1 Frontpiece .............................................................................................................................................ii Contents ................................................................................................................................................iii Forward ................................................................................................................................................ iv Families & Dynasties ...................................................................................................................1-585 A ............................................................................................................................... 1 B ............................................................................................................................ 39 C .......................................................................................................................... 124 D .......................................................................................................................... 172 E ........................................................................................................................... 201 F ........................................................................................................................... 207 G ......................................................................................................................... 234 H ............................................................................................................................ 260 I ...............................................................................................................................307 J ........................................................................................................................... 314 K .......................................................................................................................... 315 L ............................................................................................................................ 323 M ......................................................................................................................... 355 N ......................................................................................................................... 403 O .......................................................................................................................... 418 P .......................................................................................................................... 424 Q ........................................................................................................................... 450 R .......................................................................................................................... 452 S .......................................................................................................................... 467 T ......................................................................................................................... 524 U .......................................................................................................................... 538 V ........................................................................................................................... 541 W ........................................................................................................................ 554 Y ..........................................................................................................................558 Z ......................................................................................................................... 558 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................593 Index......................................................................................................................................................601 iii Forward or centuries our family history has been passed down through record-keepers who have added to the family’s genealogy. In keeping with the tradition, my maternal grandparents, Kate Lawn Ligon McGarvey and William Bowman McGarvey, continued the search for historical documents for more than half a century to obtain confirmation of the family’s existing records. And during their long search, they discovered not only dates and places of births, and marriages and deaths, but all-important marriage alliances, opening yet other paths to family connections. My cousin, Patricia Alicia McGarvey Rosendahl, took up where our grandparents left off, continuing the research and organizing their accumulated information. When she later entered university in preparation for her law degree, she gave me a copy of the work she had completed to date. Then, continuing as a family record-keeper, I also took records my parents had accumulated and added that information. I have retained the format Patricia had developed. The names on each family page, with few exceptions, are paternal descendants. The first name is the earliest known ancestor, and each successive generation shows the son and heir or, in some cases, a younger son from which our family branch descended. The nobility’s jockeying for position and power through arranged marriages was phenomenal, but a way of life for nobility of Medieval Europe. Traditionally, upon the father’s death, whatever he had owned, including his titles, etc., was usually inherited by his eldest son. In some instances the heir died before his father and the title often went to a younger brother or to the grandson. But in some of the wealthier and more powerful families, younger sons and daughters married well and gained titles. For example, Roger d’Aubigny married Amice de Mowbray. His son, Nele d’Aubigny became lord of Mowbray. There are separate family pages for the two family branches. If our connection to a particular family happened to be through the marriage of a daughter, the family she married into is indicated at the end of that entry. Then, turning to her husband’s family name, we find successive generations as well as his earliest known ancestors. If more than one sibling married into a family which also contains our ancestors, that entry is listed below as an additional succession, indicating that family’s name to reference within this work. Also, it is important to note if our family has direct ties to more than one sibling, or because of a second marriage of either of the parents, those successive generations are also listed with the pertinent family name to reference. Occasionally, we find more than one sibling marrying siblings of another family, for example, a man marrying his wife’s sister after his wife died, or 2 brothers marrying 2 sisters of another family. Surnames as we know them today were virtually nonexistent in Medieval and earlier times, people usually being identified by the location of their birth or subsequent relocation, or possibly a particular deed, occupation or, in some cases, even a nickname. Often names evolved from father's names. So John Robert would have a child called Donald Robertson, who would have a child called John Donaldson who would have a child called Peter Johnson and so on. Daughters usually kept the surnames of their fathers, so if John FitzJames had a daughter named Catherine, she would generally, but not always, be known as Catherine FitzJames. In some cases, sons and/or daughters took the mother’s family name. For the most part, established surnames generally became more prevalent during the late 14th and early 15th centuries. There were many family alliances between French, Scotch and British families, depending, of course, on what the particular political situation was at the time. Consequently, a sibling who relocated to Britain from France may have kept the “foreign” name or may have changed the spelling somewhat to reflect his adopted country, or, in some cases, may have chosen a totally “new” surname, which, at first observation, would seem to be unrelated iv to the previous family name. There are considerable variations in spellings of both given names and surnames – Isabel, Isobel, Isabella, Elizabeth, Elisabeth, or Maud, Maude, Matilda, Mathilde, Margaret, or Eleanor, Elinor, Eleanore, Eleanora, Alianor, Alianore, and so on. How a name was recorded may give a researcher a hint as to the origin of a particular family,
Recommended publications
  • TIES of the TUDORS the Influence of Margaret Beaufort and Her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership
    TIES OF THE TUDORS The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership P.V. Smolders Student Number: 1607022 Research Master Thesis, August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. Liesbeth Geevers Leiden University, Institute for History Ties of the Tudors The Influence of Margaret Beaufort and her Web of Relations on the Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership. Pauline Vera Smolders Student number 1607022 Breestraat 7 / 2311 CG Leiden Tel: 06 50846696 E-mail: [email protected] Research Master Thesis: Europe, 1000-1800 August 2016 Supervisor: Dr. E.M. Geevers Second reader: Prof. Dr. R. Stein Leiden University, Institute for History Cover: Signature of Margaret Beaufort, taken from her first will, 1472. St John’s Archive D56.195, Cambridge University. 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 3 Introduction 4 1 Kinship Networks 11 1.1 The Beaufort Family 14 1.2 Marital Families 18 1.3 The Impact of Widowhood 26 1.4 Conclusion 30 2 Patronage Networks 32 2.1 Margaret’s Household 35 2.2 The Court 39 2.3 The Cambridge Network 45 2.4 Margaret’s Wills 51 2.5 Conclusion 58 3 The Formation and Preservation of Tudor Rulership 61 3.1 Margaret’s Reputation and the Role of Women 62 3.2 Mother and Son 68 3.3 Preserving Tudor Rulership 73 3.4 Conclusion 76 Conclusion 78 Bibliography 82 Appendixes 88 2 Abbreviations BL British Library CUL Cambridge University Library PRO Public Record Office RP Rotuli Parliamentorum SJC St John’s College Archives 3 Introduction A wife, mother of a king, landowner, and heiress, Margaret of Beaufort was nothing if not a versatile women that has interested historians for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • 130 NAPIER I (Naper, Napper) [Alington, Scott, Sturt] SCOTLAND
    130 List of Parliamentary Families NAPIER I (Naper, Napper) [Alington, Scott, Sturt] SCOTLAND & ENGLAND Baron Napier and Ettrick (1627- S and 1872- UK) Origins: The founder of the family made a fortune in the wool trade. Provost of Edinburgh 1403. His son, a merchant adventurer and courtier, was Kted 1452. Began purchasing estates in the 1530s. One family member fought at Flodden and another at Pinkie. Master of the Mint 1576. First [MP 1471 for Edinburgh]. Another [MP 1463, also for Edinburgh]. 1. Alexander Napier – [Stirlingshire 1690-1700] 2. Francis Napier – [Stirling Burgh 1698-1702] 3. Sir Charles Napier – Marylebone 1841-47 Southwark 1855-60 4. Sir Joseph Napier 1 Bt – Dublin University 1848-58 5. Mark Napier – Roxburghshire 1892-95 Seats: Thirlestane Castle (House, Tower), Selkirkshire (built late 16th c., rebuilt 1816- 20, remod. 1872, demolished 1965); Merchistoun (Merchiston) (Hall), Edinburghshire (purch. and built 1436, add. 16th c., remod. 18th c., sold 1914, later a school) Estates: Bateman 6991 (S) 2316 Titles: Baronet 1627-83; 1637- ; 1867- Peers: [2 peers 1660-86] 2 Scottish Rep peers 1796-1806 1807-23 1824-32 3 peers 1872- 1945 1 Ld Lt 18th-19 th 1 KT 19th Notes: John Napier of Merchistoun invented logarithms. 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 Barons and seventeen others in ODNB. Scott Origins: Sir William Scott 2 Bt of Thirlestane married the daughter of the 5 Baron Napier. Their son took the name Napier and inherited the Barony and Thirlestane. The Scotts were cadets of the Scotts of Harden (see Home). Granted arms 1542 and acquired estates in the first half of the 16th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Altazin, Keith, "The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 543. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE NORTHERN CLERGY AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Keith Altazin B.S., Louisiana State University, 1978 M.A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 2003 August 2011 Acknowledgments The completion of this dissertation would have not been possible without the support, assistance, and encouragement of a number of people. First, I would like to thank the members of my doctoral committee who offered me great encouragement and support throughout the six years I spent in the graduate program. I would especially like thank Dr. Victor Stater for his support throughout my journey in the PhD program at LSU. From the moment I approached him with my ideas on the Pilgrimage of Grace, he has offered extremely helpful advice and constructive criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • E:\GENEAL\Geneal Source Files\MISCELLANEOUS
    Rear Admiral Dennis Royle Farquharson Cambell, C.B., D.S.C. X7225 Dennis Cambell married Dorothy in 1933 and they remained happily in love and the best of companions for the next 67years! They have two daughters, six grandchildren and, to date, 6 great grandsons: Cal, Finn, Gabe, Alfie, Jonah and Cormac. His early years Dennis was born on 13 November 1907 in Southsea the eldest of four children. His parents, Dr Archibald Cambell (August 1880-December 1934) and Edith Farquharson Roberts (September 1881-November 1969) were married in 1906 and spent all their married life in Spencer Road, Southsea. Neville Kenneth Cambell was born in April 1911, Katharine in July 1913 and Brian in April 1919. All three sons joined the Fleet Air Arm, and Kay won a scholarship to read languages at Cambridge. In DRFC's formative years, his best friend was Alec Cook whose family lived around the corner from Spencer Road. (This friendship is still continued today by DRFC's younger and Alex's youngest daughter who have remained close friends since childhood. Although both women are in their fifties they date their friendship back 85 years!) DRFC went to Westminster School in 1921 where his form master was the forbidding Ernest Long Fox.At the end of his first term this man wrote on DRFC's report "the boy seems a perfect fool and incapable of learning anything". Fox was clearly not as perceptive as he was morose! Family Memories Of Neville, Kay says "Neville as a small boy was made a boarder at a nearby prep school because my father got very tired of dragging a reluctant child to school everyday.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteenth Century Literary Culture with Particular
    FIFTEENTH CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR* REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, **FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY Elizabeth Ann Urquhart Submitted for the Degree of Ph.!)., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. .1 ''CONTENTS page SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ill INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 The Stafford Family 1066-1521 12 CHAPTER 2 How the Staffords could Afford Patronage 34 CHAPTER 3 The PrIce of Patronage 46 CHAPTER 4 The Staffords 1 Ownership of Books: (a) The Nature of the Evidence 56 (b) The Scope of the Survey 64 (c) Survey of the Staffords' Book Ownership, c. 1372-1521 66 (d) Survey of the Bourgchiers' Book Ownership, c. 1420-1523 209 CHAPTER 5 Considerations Arising from the Study of Stafford and Bourgchier Books 235 CHAPTER 6 A Brief Discussion of Book Ownership and Patronage Patterns amongst some of the Staffords' and Bourgchiers' Contemporaries 252 CONCLUSION A Piece in the Jigsaw 293 APPENDIX Duke Edward's Purchases of Printed Books and Manuscripts: Books Mentioned in some Surviving Accounts. 302 NOTES 306 TABLES 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY 379 FIFTEENTR CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. Elizabeth Ann Urquhart. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. SUMMARY The aim of this study is to investigate the nature of the r61e played by literary patronage in fostering fifteenth century English literature. The topic is approached by means of a detailed exam- ination of the books and patronage of the Stafford family.
    [Show full text]
  • Orate Pro Nostris Et Oravimus Pro Vestris. Promised Prayers for an Anniversary of Death. the Case of Elisabeth ‘Sconincs’ Mortuary Roll (1458-1459)
    KU Leuven Faculty of Arts Blijde Inkomststraat 21 box 3301 3000 LEUVEN, BELGIË Orate pro nostris et oravimus pro vestris. Promised prayers for an anniversary of death. The case of Elisabeth ‘sConincs’ mortuary roll (1458-1459) Maria Mejia Sian Presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Advanced Master of Arts in Medieval and Renaissance Studies Supervisor: prof. dr. Paul Trio Academic year 2015-2016 135.052 characters Preface The first few months I spent working on this thesis, I knew the mortuary roll of Elisabeth ‘sConincs only by photographs. In November of 2015, I had the opportunity to visit the John Ryland’s Library in Manchester. I was given the rare chance to actually see and touch this well-kept mortuary roll, known there as Latin MS 114. It was a very special moment to be so close to a manuscript that passed through the hands of so many people over 500 years ago. The manuscript is fragile, of course, but the gold used in the illuminations is still shining, and the inscriptions bear the traces of their makers, with ink in different colours, additional lines, corrections and spots. So many handwritings, hundreds of entries, vellum after vellum stitched together, too many to unveil the entire roll that afternoon. But my brief physical encounter gave me a strong and lasting impression of a unique document that holds so much in it: an archaeological object, a work of medieval illustrational art, a collection of Latin handwritings, a devotional object meant to keep the memory of a deceased person alive and to pray for salvation of all souls, an agreement between parties to strengthen mutual bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • 1028 Cir 1068 Cir 1080 7 Feb 1102 24 Aug 1113 5 Mar 1133 Cir 1122
    William the Mathilda Conqueror d: 1083 1028 d: 9 Sep 1087 in Rouen, France King Henry I of Queen Edith England "Matilda of Cir 1068 Scotland" d: 1135 Cir 1080 d: 1 May 1118 in Westminster Palace Queen of the Henry V Holy Roman Geoffrey Plantagenet Count Adelin William of England Romans Matilda Empreror of Anjou 5 Aug 1103 Holy Roman d: 1125 Empress 24 Aug 1113 7 Feb 1102 d: 10 Sep 1167 King Henry Queen Eleanor of Geoffrey Plantagenet Count William X Plantagenet Count Plantagenet II of Aquitaine of Nantes of Poitou England, Henry Plantagenet Cir 1122 d: 1 Apr 1204 5 Mar 1133 d: 6 Jul 1189 King John Isabella Countess of Queen Isabella Matilda (Maud) Plantagenet Henry the Lion, Duke of Gloucester Countess of of England, Duchess of Saxony of of Bavaria 24 Dec 1166 Angouleme Saxony Cir 1188 d: 4 Jun 1246 King Henry III Queen Eleanor of Plantagenet of Provence England 1223 1 Oct 1207 d: Jun 1291 d: 16 Nov 1272 King Edward I Eleanor of Castle Edmund Earl of Aveline de Forz Blanche of Artois, Queen Leicester and Dowager of Navarre Lancaster Cir 1258 d: Cir 1273 1248 16 Jan 1245 d: 2 May 1302 d: 5 Jun King Edward II Isabella of France Henry 3rd Earl of Lancaster Maud Chaworth Plantagenet of England 1281 2 Feb 1282 d: 22 Sep 1345 d: 3 Dec 1322 25 Apr 1284 d: 21 Sep 1327 King Edward III Philippa of Mary of Lancaster, Baroness Henry Percy 3rd Plantagenet of Hainault Percy Baron Percy of England 1320 Alnwick 13 Nov 1312 d: 1 Sep 1362 1321 d: 21 Jun 1377 in d: 1368 Sheen Palace, Richmond Lionel Plantagenet of Elizabeth de Burgh Countess Antwerp, 1st
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of This Thesis Is to Trace Lady Katherine Grey's Family from Princess Mary Tudor to Algernon Seymour a Threefold A
    ABSTRACT THE FAMILY OF LADY KATHERINE GREY 1509-1750 by Nancy Louise Ferrand The purpose of this thesis is to trace Lady Katherine Grey‘s family from Princess Mary Tudor to Algernon Seymour and to discuss aspects of their relationship toward the hereditary descent of the English crown. A threefold approach was employed: an examination of their personalities and careers, an investigation of their relationship to the succession problem. and an attempt to draw those elements together and to evaluate their importance in regard to the succession of the crown. The State Papers. chronicles. diaries, and the foreign correspondence of ambassadors constituted the most important sources drawn upon in this study. The study revealed that. according to English tradition, no woman from the royal family could marry a foreign prince and expect her descendants to claim the crown. Henry VIII realized this point when he excluded his sister Margaret from his will, as she had married James IV of Scotland and the Earl of Angus. At the same time he designated that the children of his younger sister Mary Nancy Louise Ferrand should inherit the crown if he left no heirs. Thus, legally had there been strong sentiment expressed for any of Katherine Grey's sons or descendants, they, instead of the Stuarts. could possibly have become Kings of England upon the basis of Henry VIII's and Edward VI's wills. That they were English rather than Scotch also enhanced their claims. THE FAMILY OF LADY KATHERINE GREY 1509-1750 BY Nancy Louise Ferrand A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of History 1964 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ridale Family, Rather the De Ridales to Help Distinguish Them
    Marritt, S. (2011) The Ridale papal letters and royal charter: a twelfth- century Anglo-Scottish baronial family, the papacy, the law, and charter diplomatic. English Historical Review, CXXVI (523). pp. 1332-1354. ISSN 0013-8266 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/59664 Deposited on: 02 February 2012 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 The Ridale Papal Letters and Royal Charter: a Twelfth-century Anglo-Scottish Baronial Family, the Papacy, the Law, and Charter Diplomatic* Three original papal letters issued between 1156 and 1176 for the Ridale family concerning lands in Scotland and the North Riding of Yorkshire survive among the manuscripts of their descendants the Riddells of Whitefield, Hepple, Northumberland.1 The letters were well known in the nineteenth century but they have been little studied since, despite being amongst the earliest extant papal letters for a twelfth-century baronial family (indeed, the only Scottish examples) and, as a set of such documents, extraordinarily rare.2 As late as the 1820s, the Riddells also still held a King David I of Scotland charter granting Walter de Ridale land in Lilliesleaf and elsewhere in Teviotdale, Roxburghshire (1145x1153).3 It is now lost, but its text contains the earliest Scottish royal warrandice clause and one of the earliest Scottish references to tenure for a specified amount of knight service.4 Pope Adrian IV issued the first papal letter in 1156 for Walter’s brother Ansketill, confirming his possessions and especially Walter’s bequest to him by his testamentum of the Scottish estates. Such a bequest of land held by knight service to a secular beneficiary is another *I am very grateful to Professor Dauvit Broun and Dr Bryan Dick of the University of Glasgow for their advice and encouragement in the preparation of this article, to the readers for EHR for their perceptive suggestions, and to the staff of the Northumberland Collections Service at Woodhorn for their help with the manuscripts.
    [Show full text]