DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF} Technopoly Kindle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF} Technopoly Kindle TECHNOPOLY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Postman N | 10 pages | 01 Apr 1993 | Random House USA Inc | 9780679745402 | English | New York, United States Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology by Neil Postman I hate that Social Science is displacing being well read when discussing opinions of public affair. This is just another rebuke of modern culture written by someone who has refused to adapt to changes. I don't know how to fix this; solve the problem for me. Oh, and if you don't agree with my assertions then you are an idiot. You completely understand exactly what you don't agree with as you're reading it. It's a good example of persuasive writing, but infuriating to anyone who is informed on the subjects that he speaks on as the learned reader can spot his "white lies" deliberate or born of ignorance, I'm not sure , incorrect assertions, and use of logical fallacies. View all 3 comments. Sep 23, Kris rated it really liked it Shelves: read-write-think , audiobooks. Very direct and short. I don't agree with everything he says, but it's worth a read as he has some interesting ideas. It's about the history of technology and its influence on our Western culture: how we think about tools and how we train our brains to work. He talks about the difference between learning information and facts knowledge vs. Most of all, he urges us to start critically analyzing our interaction with technology Very direct and short. Most of all, he urges us to start critically analyzing our interaction with technology something that still astounds me people don't do. He references ideas from The Closing of the American Mind. Some of his ideas reminded me of Lewis's "men without chests" from The Abolition of Man. I still want to read Postman's The Disappearance of Childhood. Jan 13, Paul Ataua rated it liked it. Despite being published in and therefore dealing with technology well before the internet revolution, many of the ideas are very relevant in our world today. Some really thought provoking points, like asking how important the invention of the printing press was to the coming of the Lutheran reformation. The central hypothesis that there are good and bad effects to every new technological advance needs to be put forward, but the book tends to repeat that point so many times and never really Despite being published in and therefore dealing with technology well before the internet revolution, many of the ideas are very relevant in our world today. The central hypothesis that there are good and bad effects to every new technological advance needs to be put forward, but the book tends to repeat that point so many times and never really goes deeper than that. May 28, Beth Barnett rated it really liked it. Another book about the danger of trusting too fully in technology. Postman's argument encourages us to keep those low-tech ideas and solutions that still work better and view technology with reason, looking for that which truly benefits us as humans, rather than embracing technology that degrades us. For similar writing, read Wendell Berry also. Jul 19, Trevor Atwood added it. It is without a moral center. It puts in its place efficiency, interest, and economic advance. It promises heaven on earth through the conveniences of technological progress. It casts aside all traditional narratives and symbols that suggest stability and orderliness, and tells, instead, of a life of skills, technical expertise, and the ecstasy of consumption. I loved his address of statistics in particular. Did you hear about the statistician that drowned crossing the stream that was an average of 4. Then follow up with this one. Aug 25, Matthew Rogers rated it it was amazing. This book will be relevant forever. Dec 31, Alex Stroshine rated it it was amazing Shelves: for-regent , sociocultural. For instance, Technopoly has created new specialists and experts who are able to wield and control technology and thus gain power, but to the detriment of other specialists who have been rendered obsolete by technology p. Postman also laments how we have come to suffer from information overload, echoing criticisms he made in Amusing Ourselves to Death in which he bemoaned how we are flooded with useless information that has little impact on our daily lives p. In chapter five the author discusses the role of institutions and how they help to separate worthy information from useless data; for instance, colleges prevent pseudoscience from being considered academic p. Postman notes that culture privileges statistical, quantifiable data, but not all knowledge can be measured purely by statistics. While some churches deliberately practice communion rarely usually these churches are suspicious of sacraments in general , can it be said that monthly communion is more significant than weekly communion? Jun 20, Brittany Horton rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites. Anyone who opens my copy of Technopoly will see how much I enjoyed reading it. It is now filled with writing, underlining, stars, post-it notes and highlighter marks. This is my second book by Postman and I am definitely a huge fan of his theories. First of all, this is by no means anti-technology book. Postman gives a mostly unbiased opinion on the state of the technology culture today the Technopoly and how we as a society can begin to integrate technology into our classrooms without it fi Anyone who opens my copy of Technopoly will see how much I enjoyed reading it. Postman gives a mostly unbiased opinion on the state of the technology culture today the Technopoly and how we as a society can begin to integrate technology into our classrooms without it first swallowing education whole- but that's only the last chapter. Most of the book Postman spends discussing the history of the technological revolution, which started long before my generation. He discusses and explains how one generations' revolutionary invention has landed us here; now. He brings in an abundance of rich resources and ideas for the reader to consider. I appreciated Postman's emphasis on history in this book, he hardly goes into anything without first discussing the written past of whatever he is speaking about. This book helped me connect so many pieces of history together to see the bigger picture unfold. I really loved reading this and found most of the chapters fascinating- but reader beware- this is by no means a leisure read. Although fascinating- it will require your full attention. As previously stated I highlighted and saved many ideas, thoughts, and theories from this book but I especially loved this quote from the last chapter, "To remain ignorant of things that happened before you were born is to remain a child. Jan 06, Lucsly rated it it was amazing. Despite being written in , this book offers a view of the influence of technology on our lives that is as relevant as ever, if not more so in this age of government espionage on all our communications, of corporations greedily soaking up the personal information we happily share on social networking sites, of tech companies believing that their latest smart phone will improve our lives. To be sure, the author the cultural critic Neil Postman is not a Luddite: he does not deny the usefulness Despite being written in , this book offers a view of the influence of technology on our lives that is as relevant as ever, if not more so in this age of government espionage on all our communications, of corporations greedily soaking up the personal information we happily share on social networking sites, of tech companies believing that their latest smart phone will improve our lives. To be sure, the author the cultural critic Neil Postman is not a Luddite: he does not deny the usefulness of technology, but he warns against placing them central in our lives, in believing in them without any reflection on them. He offers a dissenting voice in the chorus of people worshiping technology. Even better, he remains nuanced and subtle in all of his arguments - a trait that I admire and rarely see in other writings about media and technology. This could be perhaps why he seems to be all but forgotten in the fields of scholarly research into media and its effects: in my experience, those scholars automatically see media and technology seen an improvement of our lives and an enrichment of our culture. He presents an excellent reminder to keep thinking and analyzing who we are, how we want to use our technology and if we want to let it influence us or not. Aug 16, Daniel Nelms rated it it was amazing Shelves: cultural-issues-apologetics. After reading this book, your eyes will be opened as to how much our lives are governed, defined and shaped by technology. It is indeed a tyranny of technology, a technopoly. Answer: there is a cause and here is the effect. Answer: there is a measurable cause and effect, etc. This is a must read. Apr 04, Murtaza rated it liked it. To be honest many of the ideas he espoused here felt somewhat familiar to me. In fairness, this book was written decades ago and so his ideas have had a long time to filter out. I wonder what he would make of the Technopoly given that this book was written even before the Internet was invented. He correctly notes "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman is one of my favorite books, and Technopoly offers some of the same kind of effective cultural criticism that made that one such a classic.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neil Postman Writer - Media Theorist - Provocateur
    NEIL POSTMAN WRITER - MEDIA THEORIST - PROVOCATEUR Amusing Ourselves to Death The Disappearance of Childhood The Biases of Modern Media Neil Postman Writer, Media-Social Critic, Educational Theorist Provocateur Forerunner in the field of Media Anthropology/Sociology (Jacques Ellul, Marshall McLuhan, Harold Innis) Established New York University’s Graduate Media Ecology Program Postman's Central interests/focus: 1. The interactions between humans and their communication technologies 2. Paradigm shifts in human thought, culture, and media 3. How Our MEDIA & Our Technologies are REDEFINING HUMANITY Author of over 20 Books + 200 Articles: Teaching as a Subversive Activity (1969) "Bullshit and the Art of Crap-Detection“ (1969) Conscientious Objections (1988) The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985) Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (1992) The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School (1995) The Disappearance of Childhood How Media and Technology are RE-Defining Children, Youth, and Culture • CENTRAL QUESTIONS: What is “CHILDHOOD?” Who gets to define it? How has it changed in the face of MODERN MEDIA and TECHNOLOGY? • Our definition of "childhood" REALLY matters!... And it should matter to ALL of us. Incredibly important DEVELOPMENTAL phase in life • physical, psych, intellectual • will you become a DECENT HUMAN BEING?) “Childhood” is a social construct/contract Each generation redefines its boundaries and priorities We need to have a more enlighted and sophisticated awareness
    [Show full text]
  • Media Ecology – (Un)Necessary Research Perspective in Communication and Media Studies
    Pobrane z czasopisma Mediatizations Studies http://mediatization.umcs.pl Data: 01/10/2021 06:00:42 MEDIATIZATION STUDIES 3/2019 DOI: 10.17951/ms.2019.3.53-68 Małgorzata Laskowska Cardinal Wyszyński University in WarsaW. department of theory, ethiCs and media laW. institUte of media edUCation and JoUrnalism, poland [email protected] ORCID: HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0003-2192-9006 krzysztof Marcyński Cardinal Wyszyński University in WarsaW. department of rhetoriC and langUage of media. institUte of media edUCation and JoUrnalism, poland [email protected] ORCID: HTTP://ORCID.ORG/0000-0003-0255-2952 Media Ecology – (Un)necessary Research Perspective in Communication and Media Studies Abstract. The aim of this reviewUMCS and theoretical study is to determine the importance of media ecology theory for communication and media studies. Bearing in mind this research goal, the following research questions were asked: what is the media ecology theory? what approach to media and communicat ion research does it represent? what research perspectives are proposed in the ield of media ecology? what new can media ecology bring to communication and media studies? an additional objective o f the ar- ticle, and, at the same, time the intention of the authors, is to raise the interest of Polish researchers in the subject of media ecology and its various aspects, enriching research in the ield of communication and media studies. Keywords: media ecology; methodology; media nature; communication and media studies Research methods Communication and media studies, known as a scientiic discipline integrating so- cial, humanistic and technical studies (Jabłonowski, Gackowski 2012, p. 17) continue to evolve in their scientiic identity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Media Ecology Review
    Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture Volume 23 (2004) No. 2 IN THIS ISSUE A Media Ecology Review Lance Strate Fordham University AQUARTERLY REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH ISSN: 0144-4646 From the Editor Communication Research Trends Lance Strate’s excellent report on “media ecolo- Volume 23 (2004) Number 2 gy” studies approaches the subject from a literary and http://cscc.scu.edu philosophical perspective, with some input from anthropological and psychiatric sources. Many com- Published four times a year by the Centre for the Study of munication researchers explore the same territory Communication and Culture (CSCC), sponsored by the using sociological and psychological methods that California Province of the Society of Jesus. often are quantitative. For example, media effects Copyright 2004. ISSN 0144-4646 research, including much important work on media and children (cf., N. Pecora, “Children and Television,” Editor: William E. Biernatzki, S.J. Communication Research Trends, Volume 19 (1999), Managing Editor: Paul A. Soukup, S.J. Nos. 1 and 2) really deals with the cultural environ- ment in which we live and the ecological relationships it involves. The approaches may use different methods, Subscription: but they can and should support each other, in the quest Annual subscription (Vol. 23) US$45 for a broader understanding of the role of the media in our lives. Payment by check, MasterCard, Visa or US$ preferred. For payments by MasterCard or Visa, send full account —W. E. Biernatzki, S.J. number, expiration date, name on account, and signature. General Editor Checks and/or International Money Orders (drawn on USA banks; for non-USA banks, add $10 for handling) should be made payable to Communication Research Trends and sent to the managing editor Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEDIUM and MCLUHAN's MESSAGE Lance Strate1
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham CMS Faculty Publications Communications and Media Studies Fall 2012 The ediumM and McLuhan's Message Lance Strate Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/comm_facultypubs Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Lance Strate (2012), The eM dium and McLuhan's Message, RAZÓN Y PALABRA 80, Aug-Oct 2012. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communications and Media Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in CMS Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RAZÓN Y PALABRA Primera Revista Electrónica en América Latina Especializada en Comunicación www.razonypalabra.org.mx THE MEDIUM AND MCLUHAN'S MESSAGE Lance Strate1 Marshall McLuhan's famous aphorism, the medium is the message, serves as the title of the first chapter of his most influential work, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (2003), originally published in 1964. Its significance extends far beyond that starting point, as this single sentence sums up in pithy and poetic fashion the entirety of McLuhan's approach to the study of media. It would be tempting to designate this statement as the first axiom of McLuhan's media ecology, except for the fact that it is not a logical postulate, but rather is born out of McLuhan's literary sensibilities. As such, it is metaphoric, message being the metaphor for medium, leading us to ask, regarding each and every particular medium, what is the message that it conveys, and what is the effect that it produces? It is also oxymoronic, medium and message typically being considered two quite different elements of the communication process, and in some sense antonymic (paralleling the polarities of sender and receiver).
    [Show full text]
  • 16-Mcluhan-Media-Ecology.Pdf
    gri34307_ch25_318-331.indd Page 321 13/01/11 11:39 AM user-f469 /Volumes/208/MHSF234/gri34307_disk1of1/0073534307/gri34307_pagefiles Objective Interpretive CHAPTER 25 ● Socio-cultural tradition Media Ecology of Marshall McLuhan The critical and popular success of the fi lm An Inconvenient Truth caught nearly everyone by surprise. Not even dedicated environmentalists expected former Vice President Al Gore’s slide-show lecture on global warming to create the buzz it did, nor did they anticipate that Gore would be honored with the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his effort. Yet An Inconvenient Truth became one of the highest-grossing documentaries of all time, won the 2006 Academy Award for best picture in that category, and appears to have been the tipping point in Americans’ concern about the effects of global warming. Of course, not everyone liked the fi lm. Some people stayed away, because they knew what they’d see and hear (see Chapter 17). Others argued strongly against Gore’s claims. Science may prove that the climate is heating up for now, but climates are dynamic, critics suggested, and the current rise in temperature may just be an uptick in a cycle that will later go down. These skeptics also asked how it’s possible to know if human beings are directly responsible for the ongo- ing climate changes. 1 The debate on global warming turns on our attitude toward the relationship between modern civilization and the environment. Do human inventions and actions really matter when it comes to the stability of global temperatures? Are we affecting our atmosphere and, if so, does it affect us in return? In the 1960s, University of Toronto English professor Marshall McLuhan burst onto the public scene by asking similar questions about the relationship between media and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Technopolis As the Technologized Kingdom of God Fun As Technology, Technology As Religion in the 21St Century
    Cahiers d’Études Germaniques 74 | 2018 La religion au XXIe siècle Technopolis as the Technologized Kingdom of God Fun as Technology, Technology as Religion in the 21st century. God sive Fun Technopolis comme royaume technologisé de Dieu. L’Amusement (Fun) comme technologie, la technologie comme religion au xxie siècle. Dieu sive Fun Technopolis as the Technologised Kingdom of God. Fun as Technology, Technology as Religion in the 21st Century. God sive Fun Marina Christodoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceg/3019 DOI: 10.4000/ceg.3019 ISSN: 2605-8359 Publisher Presses Universitaires de Provence Printed version Date of publication: 26 April 2018 Number of pages: 119-132 ISBN: 979-10-320-0160-8 ISSN: 0751-4239 Electronic reference Marina Christodoulou, « Technopolis as the Technologized Kingdom of God », Cahiers d’Études Germaniques [Online], 74 | 2018, Online since 26 October 2019, connection on 29 November 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ceg/3019 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ceg.3019 Tous droits réservés Technopolis as the Technologized Kingdom of God Fun as Technology, Technology as Religion in the 21st century. God sive Fun Marina Christodoulou University of Klagenfurt / University of Toulouse - Jean Jaurès A fire broke out backstage in a theatre. The clown came out to warn the public; they thought it was a joke and applauded. He repeated it; the acclaim was even greater. I think that’s just how the world will come to an end: to general applause from wits who believe it’s a joke. (Søren Kierkegaard. Either/Or: A Fragment of Life, 122) Neil Postman starts his book Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (1993) 1 with a quote from Paul Goodman’s New Reformation: “Whether or not it draws on new scientific research, technology is a branch of moral philosophy, not of science.” (Postman 1993: motto; Goodman 2010: 40).
    [Show full text]
  • Technopoly: the Surrender of Culture to Technology
    2 From Tools to Technocracy Among the famous aphorisms from the troublesome pen of Karl Marx is his remark in The Poverty of Philosophy that the "hand-loom gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill, society with the industrial capitalist." As far as I know, Marx did not say which technology gives us the technocrat, and I am certain his vision did not include the emergence of the Technopolist. Nonetheless, the remark is useful. Marx understood well that, apart from their economic implications, technologies create the ways in which people perceive reality, and that such ways are the key to understanding diverse forms of social and mental life. In The German Ideology, he says, "As individuals express their life, so they are," which sounds as much like Marshall McLuhan or, for that matter, Thamus as it is possible to sound. Indeed, toward the end of that book, Marx includes a remarkable paragraph that would be entirely at home in McLuhan's Understanding Media. "Is Achilles possible," he asks, "when powder and shot have been invented? And is the Iliad possible at all when the printing press and even printing machines exist? Is it not inevitable 22 Technopoly that with the emergence of the press, the singing and the telling and the muse cease; that is, the conditions for epic poetry disappear?"1 By connecting technological conditions to symbolic life and psychic habits, Marx was doing nothing unusual. Before him, scholars found it useful to invent taxonomies of culture based on the technological character of an age. And they do it still, for the practice is something of a persistent scholarly industry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1: the Judgment of Thamus Benefits Might Be, Which, As We Know, Have Been Considerable
    Neil Postman, Technolopoly: the surrender of culture to technology (Knopf, 1992) had such an effect. Thamus’ error is in his believing that writing will be a burden to society and nothing but a burden. For all his wisdom, he fails to imagine what writing’s 1: The Judgment of Thamus benefits might be, which, as we know, have been considerable. We may learn from this that it is a mistake to suppose that any technological innovation has a one-sided effect. You will find in Plato’s Phaedrus a story about Thamus, the king of a great city of Upper Every technology is both a burden and a blessing; not either-or, but this-and-that. Egypt. For people such as ourselves, who are inclined (in Thoreau’s phrase) to be tools of Nothing could be more obvious, of course, especially to those who have given more our tools, few legends are more instructive than his. The story, as Socrates tells it to his than two minutes of thought to the matter. Nonetheless, we are currently surrounded by friend Phaedrus, unfolds in the following way: Thamus once entertained the god Theuth, throngs of zealous Theuths, one-eyed prophets who see only what new technologies can who was the inventor of many things, including number, calculation, geometry, astronomy, do and are incapable of imagining what they will undo. We might call such people and writing. Theuth exhibited his inventions to King Thamus, claiming that they should Technophiles. They gaze on technology as a lover does on his beloved, seeing it as with- be made widely known and available to Egyptians.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemplating Neil Postman's Critique of Advertising Yingwen Wang
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-10-2019 When Humanity Meets Technology: Contemplating Neil Postman's Critique of Advertising Yingwen Wang Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Public Relations and Advertising Commons, Rhetoric Commons, Social Media Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wang, Y. (2019). When Humanity Meets Technology: Contemplating Neil Postman's Critique of Advertising (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1793 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. WHEN HUMANITY MEETS TECHNOLOGY: CONTEMPLATING NEIL POSTMAN’S CRITIQUE OF ADVERTISING A Dissertation Submitted to McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Yingwen Wang May 2019 Copyright by Yingwen Wang 2019 WHEN HUMANITY MEETS TECHNOLOGY: CONTEMPLATING NEIL POSTMAN’S CRITIQUE OF ADVERTISING By Yingwen Wang Approved December 20, 2018 ________________________________ ________________________________ Dr. Calvin L. Troup Dr. Janie Harden Fritz President, Geneva College Professor of Communication & Rhetorical Visiting Scholar, Communication
    [Show full text]
  • Technopoly.Pdf
    For Faye and Manny Whether or not it draws on new scientific research, technology is a branch of moral philosophy, not of science. PAUL GOODMAN, New Reformation Contents Cover Title Page Copyright Dedication Epigraph Introduction 1. The Judgment of Thamus 2. From Tools to Technocracy 3. From Technocracy to Technopoly 4. The Improbable World 5. The Broken Defenses 6. The Ideology of Machines: Medical Technology 7. The Ideology of Machines: Computer Technology 8. Invisible Technologies 9. Scientism 10. The Great Symbol Drain 11. The Loving Resistance Fighter Notes Bibliography About the Author Other Books by This Author Introduction In 1959, Sir Charles Snow published The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, which was both the title and the subject of the Rede Lecture he had given earlier at Cambridge University. The lecture was intended to illuminate what Sir Charles saw as a great problem of our age—the opposition of art and science, or, more precisely, the implacable hostility between literary intellectuals (sometimes called humanists) and physical scientists. The publication of the book caused a small rumble among academics (let us say, a 2.3 on the Richter Scale), not least because Snow came down so firmly on the side of the scientists, giving humanists ample reason and openings for sharp, funny, and nasty ripostes. But the controversy did not last long, and the book quickly faded from view. For good reason. Sir Charles had posed the wrong question, given the wrong argument, and therefore offered an irrelevant answer. Humanists and scientists have no quarrel, at least none that is of sufficient interest to most people.
    [Show full text]