Abled Initiative

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abled Initiative community stories October 2005 ISBN #1-55382-150-5 ANC Begins in Scarborough Village A brief history The Action for Neighbourhood Change project (ANC) may be complex but its A portion of Scarborough known as purpose is clear. The initiative is about real Scarborough Village has been selected as the people helping one another to make their area for involvement in Toronto’s Action for neighbourhoods better places to live. Since Neighbourhood Change (ANC) project. the project began in February 2005, it has Spreading north from a series of sand bluffs along generated optimism and hope among the coast of Lake Ontario, Scarborough was community members. The partners are established as an agricultural settlement in the excited that the program is having the 1800s by mostly English and Scottish immigrants. desired results: Citizens are becoming During the second half of the 20th century, involved in changing their neighbourhoods Scarborough evolved into a suburban Toronto and government is hearing the feedback community. Wave after wave of housing develop- it needs to support them effectively. This ments, a Golden Mile of strip malls and a well series of stories presents each of the five developed road system defined Scarborough as a ANC neighbourhoods as they existed at bedroom community suited to middle-income the start of the initiative. A second series families. Low-cost high rise apartments were built will be published at the end of the ANC’s from the 1960s onward to house new immigrants, 14-month run to document the changes but settlement programs and services were not and learnings that have resulted from the made available. effort. For more information about ANC, visit: www.anccommunity.ca In the early 1980s, when (then) Metro Toronto began looking for modestly priced tracts community stories of land on which to site social housing, the Mayor continued to see itself as a bedroom community of Scarborough offered several properties for the reliant on the automobile, half of its 593,297 construction of high rise apartments.1 Often residents were recent immigrants and 60 percent situated adjacent to industrial areas, railway lines were visible minorities. and high speed roadways, these developments were physically isolated and often overlooked by The new Toronto City Council operates Scarborough residents and politicians. Many of four community councils to address issues of local the apartments were occupied by recent immi- concern. One of these council areas closely grants. Partly because their accommodations matched the borders of the former City of added to a sense of marginalization and partly Scarborough. Over time, the boundaries of the because of language and access barriers, these other three community councils were adjusted new community members did not push for social according to various requirements; those programs or better living conditions. Scarborough encompassing Scarborough have remained also lacked a strong network of community unchanged. agencies that could pursue program funding, unlike the well-established social service agencies Despite an apparent acceptance of the in downtown Toronto. Increased levels of immi- status quo among Scarborough’s political gration throughout the 1990s added more representatives, citizens and service providers newcomers to an already underserviced area. were beginning to push for change. In the spring of 2003, a group of about 40 people began to In the late 1980s, homeless families were meet regularly to discuss how to communicate a worrisome addition to Toronto’s homeless Scarborough’s multicultural personality and needs population and no downtown shelters existed to to city councillors. The Scarborough Community house them. Scarborough’s municipal council Action Network (SCAN) was born. again offered inexpensive accommodations to fill this gap. A stretch of deteriorating and unused motels along Scarborough’s Kingston Road were The changing face (and place) of poverty in made available to shelter these families, though Toronto the lack of cooking facilities in each unit made food security an issue. Some Scarborough resi- A portion of Scarborough Village was dents began to complain to Toronto City Hall that chosen by United Way of Greater Toronto these accommodations were unsightly and needed (UWGT) as its focus for ANC partly because the to be cleaned up. area embodies the types of changes which have affected Toronto neighbourhoods over the last When the amalgamated city of Toronto 20 years. Prior to 1981, families living on low was created in 1998, the people of Scarborough incomes were spread fairly evenly throughout the were faced with a new reality. The previously city. After that time, concentrated areas of higher unacknowledged and under serviced low-income levels of poverty began to emerge and whole neigh- accommodations (including the motel family bourhoods were identified as under financial shelters) now were the direct responsibility of stress. The former municipalities of Scarborough, Scarborough in its new role as a member of the North York and Etobicoke have seen particularly amalgamated municipality. In 2001, statistics dramatic increases in the number of higher poverty showed that while the former City of Scarborough neighbourhoods. 2 Caledon Institute of Social Policy community stories United Way of Greater Toronto and the Responsibility for Homelessness: An Action Canadian Council on Social Development focused Plan for Toronto.2 The paper focused on the attention on this phenomenon of rising poverty need to see homelessness as a multi-dimensional levels by neighbourhood in a publication entitled problem which must be addressed collaboratively “Poverty by Postal Code” [UWGT and CCSD by multiple levels of government, community 2004]. Already a shorthand reference to the organizations and citizens. At this time, UWGT problem, the report affirmed UWGT’s directional and staff at the City of Toronto are working in shift toward supporting community development partnership on the issues of neighbourhood and neighbourhood revitalization efforts. The renewal and poverty reduction. Creating stronger ANC project will further this work; in particular, relationships among provincial and federal it will support efforts to influence federal and local government departments is a priority for both policy developments which affect neighbourhood organizations. vitality. Within UWGT, there was a general sense “Toronto still has areas of concentrated that Toronto’s inner city had received the resources poverty in the downtown core,” says UWGT and attention it required to get poverty reduction Research Director Susan MacDonnell, “but the strategies into place. In 2002, the organization new reality of urban poverty is what is happening began to test new approaches to strengthen in the inner suburbs. Scarborough is a good services in Toronto’s suburban neighbourhoods example of this new reality, where communities by launching its “Strong Neighbourhoods, Healthy originally designed for the automobile and a City Strategy.” By 2003, community development middle-income population are now home to lower- work had assumed sufficient importance within income populations who don’t have access to a UWGT that it needed to be thoroughly integrated car and who are far more reliant on local shops into the existing corporate culture. The UWGT’s and services. Yet these communities have few 2003 strategic plan described new policy and amenities. It is this combination of factors – a research mechanisms and funding and governance growing low-income population and a lack of structures which would direct future community services and supports – that is creating commu- development work. UWGT also pledged to assist nities under stress.” agencies and other community members in the areas of public policy formulation and capacity Sean Meagher and a three-member team building. from Public Interest Strategy have been contracted to conduct the on-the-ground work of ANC – Barney Savage, UWGT Senior Policy which begins with the identification of as many Advisor with responsibility for community community players as possible. affairs and development, credits another trend with the shift in direction. Says Barney: “Our donor population had become more interested in funding The changing mandate of the United Way of community development work and was asking for Greater Toronto more information on our activities and results. We are very pleased to participate in the ANC project The United Way of Greater Toronto’s to get a better understanding of how the community current approach to community development was development approach unfolds at the neighbour- influenced by the 1999 report entitled Taking hood level – the human and financial resources Caledon Institute of Social Policy 3 community stories required, the possible impacts on federal gov- nine neighbourhoods in need of immediate ernment policy and the benefits to residents. assistance were the next selection criteria applied.3 Ultimately, ANC and the lessons we have learned Once the number of possible neighbourhoods was from our other community development projects narrowed down to five, the selection committee will help us to better understand who we need to undertook a second review of the criteria and work with on this type of initiative and the impact chose Scarborough Village. we can have as an organization. The project is providing a unique opportunity to test out inno- Says Susan MacDonnell: “Our reason for vative ideas in a highly diverse neighbourhood,
Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Settlement
    HISTORICAL SETTLEMENT CHAPTER 3 The period of historical settlement in the Highland Creek watershed began in about 1650 when aboriginal populations first made contact with European explorers and settlers. A major landmark on the north shore of Lake Ontario, the Scarborough Highlands lent their name to the creek immediately below them from the beginning. Its Mississauga name of “Yat.qui.I.be.no.nick”, recorded in 1796, and all subsequent names reflect its geographical position as the first creek below the high land. Travellers going westward on the lake would often camp at the mouth of the Highland Creek rather than attempt a passage along the base of the Bluffs in darkness or bad weather. The following sections provide an overview of the historical period including contact between aboriginal and Euro-Canadian peoples, key characteristics of the successive periods of settlement, the impact of this settlement on the environment, and a summary of heritage resources found in the watershed. 3.1 CONTACT 1650 TO 1800 Following the decimation and ultimate dispersal of the Petun and Huron by the Iroquois in 1650, southern Ontario was uninhabited for a few years before the Iroquois moved into the area to establish a number of large villages along the north shore of Lake Ontario for the exploitation of the local fur resources. One such village was Ganatsekiagon, located on the Rouge River. No villages of this size and importance have been found in the Highland Creek watershed, but evidence shows that the resources of Highland Creek were used by the native peoples of these villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment and Cultural Heritage Assessment Reports
    Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto SCARBOROUGH-MALVERN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT TRANSIT PROJECT ASSESSMENT STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT – APPENDICES APPENDIX C5 – ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS DIVISION PROJECT PERSONNEL Senior Project Manager: Robert Pihl, MA CAHP Partner and Senior Archaeologist Manager, Environmental Assessments Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Project Manager: Rebecca Sciarra, MA CAHP Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes Heritage Planner Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit Corridor Cultural Heritage Specialist: Rebecca Sciarra Transit Project Assessment Study City of Toronto, Ontario Project Administrator: Sarah Jagelewski, Hon. BA Research Archaeologist Submitted to: Report Preparation: Lindsay Popert, MA CAHP Assistant Heritage Planner IBI Group 230 Richmond Street West Graphics Preparation: Erin King, GIS Technician Toronto, ON M5V 1V6 Tel: (416) 596-1930 Lindsay Popert Fax: (416) 596-0644 Report Reviewer: Rebecca Sciarra Prepared by: Archaeological Services Inc. 528 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5S 2P9 Tel.: 416-966-1069 Fax: 416-966-9723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.iasi.to ASI File 08EA-104 March 2009 (Revised September 2009; October 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit Corridor Transit Project Assessment Study 2.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE City of Toronto, Ontario LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 1 3.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 7 Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI) was contracted by IBI Group, Toronto, to conduct a built heritage and 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 17 cultural landscape assessment as part of a Transit Project Assessment for the Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor, City of Toronto, Ontario (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Civic Centre Branch Library Project Enhancement Options
    Anne Bailey Director, Branch Libraries Toronto Public Library www.torontopubliclibrary.ca ________________________________________________________________ BRIEFING NOTE – Poverty Reduction Initiatives at Toronto Public Library _____________________________________________________________ Toronto Public Library has developed two initiatives for the City’s poverty reduction strategy in 2015, the Library Access – Fines Forgiveness program and Youth Hubs. What is the Library Access - Fine Forgiveness program? Library Access - Fine Forgiveness is a program to reinstate full library services and borrowing for children and youth at library branches in poverty areas by forgiving outstanding fines starting second quarter 2015, making summer reading programs, collections and after school programs fully accessible to the target audience. Children and youth registered at the 31 library branches and bookmobile stops delivering services to the Toronto Strong Neighbourhood Stratey (TSNS) 2020 neighbourhood improvement areas, whose library privileges are suspended, will be contacted and offered a forgiveness coupon so that full privileges are restored upon presentation of the coupon at the TSNS branch (Attachments 1 and 2). The program will be implemented in two phases. First, in spring 2015 the library will reach out to these children and teens to reinstate their privileges and invite them to join the summer reading club and participate in summer programs at their local branch. Second, in the fall as the school year gets underway, the Library will reach out again to children and teens registered at the TSNS branches with suspended cards, to reinstate their privileges and invite them back to the library. After school programs, reading support programs, collections, computer access and study spaces will be promoted. This campaign can be readily implemented and the outcomes will be tracked by branch.
    [Show full text]
  • 3101 Eglinton Avenue East Scarborough, ON
    Eglinton Avenue East Mason Road SOLD 68-Unit Apartment Building in Scarborough Village 3101 Eglinton Avenue East Scarborough, ON Well-maintained 6-storey, elevator-serviced apartment building 68 units in Scarborough Village Steps to Eglinton GO Station For more information and to discuss pricing please contact The Multi-Residential Group: David Lieberman†, MBA Jonathan Hittner* Principal Vice President 416.673.4013 416.436.4417 [email protected] [email protected] Neil Musselwhite† Senior Associate 289.795.4430 [email protected] Investment Highlights • 68 spacious units in well-maintained six-storey rental apartment building. The Avison Young • Located in family-friendly neighbourhood Multi-Residential Group with close proximity to Eglinton GO Approach Station, Scarborough Bluffs and Toronto’s East-end waterfront parks. Thorough due diligence process Best-in-class marketing materials Professional aerial photographs HWY 401 SCARBOROUGH Maximum exposure Face-to-face negotiation Accurate valuation forecast WEXFORD Local and international representation DON MILLS EGLINTON EAST DVP Our Services Apartment Apartment Kingston Road Building Sales Consultation Land Residential Development Development DANFORTH Sales Services VILLAGE THE BEACHES Opinion Rental LAKE of Value Rate ONTARIO Presentations Survey Lake Shore Blvd E For more information and to discuss pricing please contact The Multi-Residential Group: David Lieberman†, MBA Jonathan Hittner* Neil Musselwhite† Principal Vice President Senior Associate 416.673.4013 416.436.4417 289.795.4430 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] avisonyoung.com Avison Young Commercial Real Estate (Ontario) Inc., Brokerage 18 York Street, Suite 400, Toronto, ON M5J 2T8 T: 416.955.0000 F: 416.955.0724 *Broker † Sales Representative .
    [Show full text]
  • ANC Sketches Building a Neighbourhood Renewal Process Ruary 2007 Feb - I
    ANC Sketches Building a Neighbourhood Renewal Process ruary 2007 Feb - i - Anne Makhoul Table of Contents Preface III Introduction 1 Theory of Change 2 How change works in a neighbourhood 6 Initiatives by community 8 Spryfield (Halifax) Greystone’s Community Garden 9 Feasibility Study for a Spryfield Family and Multi-Service Centre 12 The Spryfield Business Directory 15 Scarborough Village (Toronto) Community Animators 18 Heritage Language Classes 21 Neighbourhood Women Engage with Elected Officials 24 Simpson-Ogden (Thunder Bay) Establishing a Neighbourhood Advisory Committee 27 Building Resilient Communities by Engaging Youth 30 North Central (Regina) Foundational Relationship Work 33 Bridgeview (Surrey) Bridgeview in Motion – Building a Shared Vision and Mission 36 Linking Up Community Services 39 Themes, questions and impact on the ANC Theory of Change 42 Engaging and Mobilizing 44 Collective Mission/Vision 45 Collective Action 46 Last words 47 References 48 List of Figures Figure 1: ANC Theory of Change 3 Figure 2: What Makes a Neighbourhood? 6 Figure 3: Understanding Change 7 Figure 4: Applying the ANC Theory of Change: Interventions 43 - i - - ii - Preface This paper was developed by a group of people brought together by the Action for Neighbourhood Change initiative. It presents an understanding of how change occurs in a neighbourhood which is based on previous and current community and neighbourhood revitalization efforts. The author would like to take this opportunity to thank the following individuals for their input and thoughtful comments on the construction of this paper: Pat Steenberg, Cheryl Gorman, Susan Taylor-Simpson, Louise Kearney, Sherri Torjman, Mark Cabaj and Rachel Chaiton.
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Scarborough
    ~THE SCARf>OROUGH PuBLIC LIBF{\RY I BOARP THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH Map of Scarborough ,.; .; .,; ::. .,; .,; .,; "'""- :;, -< "" -< "" "" 'ti "" "" S.teele~ Ave. V IV Finch Avenue III Sileppail.d Ave. 11 D St. REFERENCE POINTS 1. Thomson Park Z. Bluffer's Park J 3. civic Centre 4. Kennedy Subway 5. Metro Zoo Ikml 6. Guild Inn 1 mile! Map of Scarborough courtesy of Rick Schofield, Heritage Scarborough THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Copyright© The City of Scarborough Public Library Board 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise for purposes of resale. Published by The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Grenville Printing 25 Scarsdale Rd. Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2R2 Raku ceramic Bicentennial Collector Plate and cover photo by Tom McMaken, 1996. Courtesy of The City of Scarborough. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Myrvold, Barbara The People of Scarborough: a history Includes index. ISBN 0-9683086-0-0 1. Scarborough (Ont.) - History. I. Fahey, Curtis, 1951- . II Scarborough Public Library Board. III. Title. FC3099.S33M97 1997 971.3'541 C97-932612-5 F1059.5.T686S35 1997 iv Greetings from the Mayor As Mayor of the City of Scarborough, and on behalf of Members of Council, I am pleased that The People of Scarborough: A History, has been produced. This book provides a chronological overview of the many diverse peoples and cultures that have contributed to the city's economic, cultural and social fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Surveillance Indicators: Diabetes
    HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: DIABETES Public Health Relevance Diabetes is a disease characterized by high blood sugar, either because the body does not produce enough insulin or because the cells do not respond to the insulin that is produced. Insulin allows sugar to be moved out of the blood and into storage in the muscles, liver, and fat. Diabetes can lead to serious complications such as blindness, kidney failure, stroke and heart disease. It can also cause premature death. Among adults aged 20 years and older, mortality rates of individuals with diabetes are twice as high as those for individuals without diabetes. There are two types of diabetes. Type 2 diabetes, previously known as adult-onset diabetes, has many modifiable risk factors, including carrying excess fat, particularly around the waist, and physical inactivity. Diets high in sugar and fat or low in vegetables and fruit also increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes, also known as juvenile diabetes or insulin dependent diabetes, is generally developed in childhood and is not caused by the same risk factors as Type 2. The data reported here include Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. The International Diabetes Federation states that over 90% of all diabetes cases are Type 2. Highlights. 1. Diabetes prevalence in Toronto increased from 2003 to 2014. The incidence remained stable over this same time period. 2. Diabetes prevalence and incidence in Toronto were lower than in the rest of the Greater Toronto Area but higher than the rest of Ontario. 3. York South Humber, Toronto Centre, Danforth East York, and Willowdale Don Mills had lower diabetes prevalence and incidence than Toronto as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Mapping
    COMMUNITY MAPPING COMMUNITY PROFILE Kingston-Galloway-Orton Park 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Methodology . 1 SECTION A: 2016 Statistics Canada – Custom Neighborhood Profile . 2 SECTION B: Main Organizations in KGO . 4 SECTION C: Resident Lead Initiatives in KGO . 6 SECTION D: Networks in KGO . 8 SECTION E: Itinerant KGO Programs and Services . 10 SECTION F: Community Consultation Summaries . 14 APPENDIX A: Survey Questions . 18 APPENDIX B: Space Audit . 20 APPENDIX C: Kingston Galloway Orton Park Sports and Recreation Resource guide . 27 APPENDIX D: Languages - Census Tracts and Ranks . 43 APPENDIX E: History of Kingston-Galloway/Orton Park Boundaries . 44. Executive summary This report is designed to capture a snapshot of the people and organizations in the East Scarborough community of Kingston Galloway/Orton Park (KGO), what they perceive to be the community’s strengths and deficits and the plans and strategies they are focusing on in early 2018. The data was gathered from a variety of sources, including census data, surveys and summaries from recent consultations and local research. The following is a summary of the information found in the body of this report: KGO strengths: Focus of efforts underway to improve how the • Resident leadership community players work together: • Networked organizations • Increasing organizational capacity to provide timely and appropriate resources and service • Focus on youth • Finding ways to be guided by resident voice and to • Facilitated learning, sharing, communication and honour
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village Community – Final Report
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village Community – Final Report Date: April 24, 2013 To: Scarborough Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District Wards: Ward 36 – Scarborough Southwest Reference 13 133943 ESC 36 TM Number: SUMMARY This report summarizes the findings and presents the conclusions of the Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village. The report concludes that the existing land use designations and zoning standards for both City- owned and privately-owned lands within the Corridor are appropriate to regulate land use. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council confirm that the existing Official Plan designations and Zoning By-law regulations for the Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor lands are appropriate. Staff report for action – Final Report – Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study 1 V.03/12 Financial Impact The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. ISSUE BACKGROUND History of the Scarborough Transportation Corridor (STC) Land Use Study The former Scarborough Transportation Corridor (referred to as the 'STC') consists of lands south of the Metrolinx railway (formerly CN railway) through Scarborough that were intended to provide an extension of the Gardiner Expressway to connect to Highway 401 in the east. The lands were formerly designated a 'Special Study Area' in the Scarborough Official Plan in the mid 1980's after Council, for the former City of Scarborough, determined they were not needed for transportation purposes. The STC lands (see Attachment 1: STC Phases) have been studied in segments since 1996. Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 and the Centre Street study have all been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX E Terrestrial Archaeology Stage 1 Report
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX E Terrestrial Archaeology Stage 1 Report DRAFT SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT – Toronto and Region Conservation ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (STAGE 1) IN THE CITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT LOTS 18 TO 27 CONCESSION B, LOTS11 TO 23 CONCESSION C, AND LOTS 3 TO 17 CONCESSION D HISTORIC SCARBOROUGH TOWNSHIP, YORK COUNTY WF-14-005 PIF P338-0101-2014 ORIGINAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 Archaeology Resource Management Services 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 trca.on.ca/archaeology Archaeology Resource Management Services MTCS Licence Issued to: 5 Shoreham Drive Janice Teichroeb (P338) Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 (416) 661-6600 ext. 6406 trca.on.ca/archaeology [email protected] trca archaeology resource management services (stage 1) scarborough waterfront project Executive Summary A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was triggered by the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act for the Scarborough Waterfront Project in the City of Toronto. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is being conducted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and is aimed at creating a new waterfront park along the Lake Ontario shoreline from Bluffers Park to East Point Park in the City of Toronto. The goal is to create a destination park featuring a system of linked scenic landscapes both along the top of the bluffs and at the water’s edge integrating shoreline regeneration, public access and safety, and natural heritage. The study area is located on Lots 18 to 27 Concession B, Lots 11 to 23 Concession C, and Lots 3 to 17 Concession D in historic Scarborough Township, York County. The objectives of this study are to provide information about the property’s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land conditions in order to evaluate the property’s potential to contain cultural heritage resources that might be impacted by the modifications proposed in the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkability in Toronto's High-Rise
    WALKABILITY IN TORONTO’S HIGH-rise NEIGHBOURHOODS Paul M. Hess, University of Toronto Jane Farrow, Jane’s Walk 2010 Final Report BLANK PAGE CONTENTS Walkability in Toronto’s High-rise Neighbourhoods – Final Report By Paul M. Hess and Jane Farrow Photo Editor: Katherine Childs Report Design and Layout, Supplementary Research and Editing: Mia Hunt Supplementary Research and Mapping: Jordan Hale Photography: Jane Farrow, Paul Hess and Katherine Childs Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Study Background and Objectives................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Study Population Demographics.................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Study Area Snapshots............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]