DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Biblical Literature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Biblical Literature Journal of Biblical Literature VOLUME 122, No. 1 Spring 2003 The Zeal of Phinehas: The Bible and the Legitimation of Violence JOHN J. COLLINS 3–21 Compositry and Creativity in 2 Samuel 21:1–14 SIMEON CHAVEL 23–52 Dating the Teacher of Righteousness and the Floruit of His Movement MICHAEL O. WISE 53–87 On the Composition History of the Longer (“Secret”) Gospel of Mark SCOTT G. BROWN 89–110 The Covenant of Circumcision (Genesis 17:9–14) and the Situational Antitheses in Galatians 3:28 TROY W. MARTIN 111–125 Biblical Theology as Dialogue: Continuing the Conversation on Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Theology L. JULIANA M. CLAASSENS 127–144 The Grammar of Resurrection in Isaiah 26:19a–c PHILIP C. SCHMITZ 145–149 Is There Halaka (the Noun) at Qumran? JOHN P. MEIER 150–155 Book Reviews 157 — Index 200 US ISSN 0021–9231 JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE (Constituent Member of the American Council of Learned Societies) EDITORS OF THE JOURNAL General Editor: GAIL R. O’DAY, Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 Book Review Editor: TODD C. PENNER, Austin College, Sherman, TX 75090 EDITORIAL BOARD Term Expiring 2003: SUSAN ACKERMAN, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 MICHAEL L. BARRÉ, St. Mary’s Seminary & University, Baltimore, MD 21210 ATHALYA BRENNER, University of Amsterdam, 1012 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands MARC BRETTLER, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110 WARREN CARTER, St. Paul School of Theology, Kansas City, MO 64127 PAUL DUFF, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 BEVERLY R. GAVENTA, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 JUDITH LIEU, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom KATHLEEN O’CONNOR, Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, GA 30031 C. L. SEOW, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 VINCENT WIMBUSH, Union Theological Seminary, New York, NY 10027 2004: JANICE CAPEL ANDERSON, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 MOSHE BERNSTEIN, Yeshiva University, New York, NY 10033-3201 ROBERT KUGLER, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219 BERNARD M. LEVINSON, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0125 THEODORE J. LEWIS, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 TIMOTHY LIM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH1 2LX Scotland STEPHEN PATTERSON, Eden Theological Seminary, St. Louis, MO 63119 ADELE REINHARTZ, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, OH N2L 3C5 Canada NAOMI A. STEINBERG, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614 SZE-KAR WAN, Andover Newton Theological School, Newton Centre, MA 92459 2005: BRIAN K. BLOUNT, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 TERENCE L. DONALDSON, Wycliffe College, Toronto, ON M5S 1H7 Canada PAMELA EISENBAUM, Iliff School of Theology, Denver, CO 80210 STEVEN FRIESEN, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 A. KATHERINE GRIEB, Virginia Theological Seminary, Alexandria, VA 22304 JEFFREY KAH-JIN KUAN, Pacific School of Religion, Berkeley, CA 94709 RICHARD D. NELSON, Perkins School of Theology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275 DAVID L. PETERSEN, Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 ALAN F. SEGAL, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 GREGORY E. STERLING, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 PATRICIA K. TULL, Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY 40205 Editorial Assistant: Susan E. Haddox, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 President of the Society: Eldon Jay Epp, Lexington, MA 02420; Vice President: David L. Petersen, Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; Chair, Research and Publications Committee: James C. VanderKam, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; Executive Director: Kent H. Richards, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Suite 350, Atlanta, GA 30329. The Journal of Biblical Literature (ISSN 0021–9231) is published quarterly. The annual subscription price is US$35.00 for members and US$75.00 for nonmembers. Institutional rates are also available. For information regarding subscriptions and membership, contact: Society of Biblical Literature, P.O. Box 2243, Williston, VT 05495-2243. Phone: 877-725-3334 (toll free) or 802-864-6185. FAX: 802-864-7626. E-mail: [email protected]. For information concerning permission to quote, editorial and business matters, please see the Spring issue, p. 2. The JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE (ISSN 0021– 9231) is published quarterly by the Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Suite 350, Atlanta, GA 30329. Periodical postage paid at Atlanta, Georgia, and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Society of Biblical Literature, P.O. Box 2243, Williston, VT 05495-2243. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Journal of Biblical Literature Volume 122 2003 GENERAL EDITOR GAIL R. O’DAY Candler School of Theology Emory University Atlanta, GA 30322 BOOK REVIEW EDITOR TODD C. PENNER Austin College, Sherman, TX 75090 A Quarterly Published by THE SOCIETY OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE EDITORIAL BOARD Term Expiring 2003: SUSAN ACKERMAN, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 MICHAEL L. BARRÉ, St. Mary’s Seminary & University, Baltimore, MD 21210 ATHALYA BRENNER, University of Amsterdam, 1012 GC Amsterdam, The Netherlands MARC BRETTLER, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110 WARREN CARTER, St. Paul School of Theology, Kansas City, MO 64127 PAUL DUFF, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 BEVERLY R. GAVENTA, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 JUDITH LIEU, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom KATHLEEN O’CONNOR, Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, GA 30031 C. L. SEOW, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 VINCENT WIMBUSH, Union Theological Seminary, New York, NY 10027 2004: JANICE CAPEL ANDERSON, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 MOSHE BERNSTEIN, Yeshiva University, New York, NY 10033-3201 ROBERT KUGLER, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, OR 97219 BERNARD M. LEVINSON, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0125 THEODORE J. LEWIS, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 TIMOTHY LIM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH1 2LX Scotland STEPHEN PATTERSON, Eden Theological Seminary, St. Louis, MO 63119 ADELE REINHARTZ, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5 Canada NAOMI A. STEINBERG, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614 SZE-KAR WAN, Andover Newton Theological School, Newton Centre, MA 92459 2005: BRIAN K. BLOUNT, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542 TERENCE L. DONALDSON, Wycliffe College, Toronto, ON M5S 1H7 Canada PAMELA EISENBAUM, Iliff School of Theology, Denver, CO 80210 STEVEN FRIESEN, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 A. KATHERINE GRIEB, Virginia Theological Seminary, Alexandria, VA 22304 JEFFREY KAH-JIN KUAN, Pacific School of Religion, Berkeley, CA 94709 RICHARD D. NELSON, Lutheran Theological Seminary, Gettysburg, PA 17325 DAVID L. PETERSEN, Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 ALAN F. SEGAL, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 GREGORY E. STERLING, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 PATRICIA K. TULL, Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY 40205 Editorial Assistant: Susan E. Haddox, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 Articles are indexed in Religion Index One: Periodicals; book reviews in Index to Book Reviews in Religion, American Theological Library Association, Evanston, Illinois. Both indexes are also found in the ATLA Religion Database on CD-ROM. EDITORIAL MATTERS OF THE JBL 1. Contributors should consult the Journal’s Instructions for Contributors (http://www.sbl-site.org/Publica- tions/handbook/SBL-pubs-JBL-inst.html). 2. If a MS of an article, critical note, or book review is submitted in a form that departs in major ways from these instructions, it may be returned to the author for retyping, even before it is considered for publication. 3. Submit two hard copies of the MS of an article or critical note and, if their return is desired, include a stamped, self-addressed envelope. 4. Manuscripts and communications regarding the content of the Journal should be addressed to Gail R. O’Day at the address given on the preceding page (or correspondence only at the following e-mail address: [email protected]). 5. Communications concerning book reviews should be addressed to Todd C. Penner at the address given on the preceding page. The editors do not guarantee to review or to return unsolicited books. 6. Permission to quote more than 500 words may be requested from the Rights and Permissions Department, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Suite 350, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA (E-mail: [email protected]). Please specify volume, year, and inclusive page numbers. BUSINESS MATTERS OF THE SBL (not handled by the editors of the Journal) 1. All correspondence regarding membership in the Society, subscriptions to the Journal, change of address, renewals, missing or defective issues of the Journal, and inquiries about other publications of the Society should be addressed to Society of Biblical Literature, P.O. Box 2243, Williston, VT 05495-2243. E-mail: [email protected]. Toll-free U.S. Domestic phone: 877-725-3334. FAX: 802-864-7626. 2. All correspondence concerning the research and publications programs, the annual meeting of the Society, and other business should be addressed to the Executive Director, Society of Biblical Literature, The Luce Center, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329. (E-mail: [email protected]).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Form, Function and History of the Present Suffix -I/-Ën in Albanian and Its Dialects
    M.A. Lopuhaä Form, function and history of the present suffix -i/-ën in Albanian and its dialects Master Thesis, July 1, 2014 Supervisor: Dr. M.A.C. de Vaan Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Conventions and notation 5 3 Background and statement of the problem 7 3.1 The Albanian verbal system ................................... 7 3.2 The Proto-Albanian verbal system ............................... 8 3.3 Main research questions ..................................... 9 3.4 Previous work on the subject .................................. 9 4 Morphological changes from Old Albanian to Modern Albanian 11 4.1 Verbal endings in Old and Modern Albanian .......................... 11 4.2 Present singular .......................................... 12 4.3 Present plural ........................................... 12 4.4 Imperfect and subjunctive .................................... 13 5 Proto-Albanian reconstruction 14 6 Proto-Indo-European reconstruction 17 6.1 Vocalic nasals in Albanian .................................... 17 6.2 The reality of a PIE suffix *-n-ie/o- ............................... 18 7 Dialectal information 20 7.1 Buzuku .............................................. 23 7.2 Northwestern Geg ........................................ 23 7.3 Northern Geg ........................................... 24 7.4 Northeastern Geg ......................................... 25 7.5 Central Geg ............................................ 26 7.6 Southern Geg ........................................... 27 7.7 Transitory dialects .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • UDK 811.16'373.45:811.511 Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak Uniwersytet Łódzki / Univerza V Lodžu [email protected]
    UDK 811.16'373.45:811.511 Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak Uniwersytet Łódzki / Univerza v Lodžu [email protected] ARE THERE TRACES OF A FINNO-UGRIC SUBSTRATUM IN PROTO-SLAVIC?1 The author discusses the problem of possible Uralic borrowings in Proto-Slavic, hypoth- esizing that the Proto-Slavs in their homeland (presumably located in Eastern Europe) were neighbours of some unknown Finno-Ugric tribes. Moreover, he suggests that Proto-Slavic loanwords of Uralic origin refer not only to plants (e.g., oak, tinder fungus) and the natural environment (e.g., PSl. *kǫpa f. ‘a hillock or an island overgrown with trees’), but also to some basic social terms (e.g., PSl. *čьlověkъ m. ‘human being, man, husband, serf, servant’; *mǫ̑ žь m. ‘man, husband’). Language contacts between the Proto-Slavs and a Finno-Ugric substra- tum must have been exceptionally intensive, as the Proto-Slavs borrowed some verbs—e.g., PSl. *kǫpati ‘to immerse in water, to bathe, to wash’, PSl. *ličiti ‘to count, reckon, calculate’. Keywords: borrowings, language contacts, Proto-Slavic, substratum, Uralic influence Avtor obravnava vprašanje morebitnih uralskih izposojenk v praslovanščini, izhajajoč iz domneve, da so Praslovani v svoji pradomovini (ki je bila verjetno v vzhodni Evropi) živeli v soseščini z neznanimi ugrofinskimi plemeni. Naposled ugotavlja, da se praslovanske izposo- jenke uralskega (ugrofinskega) izvora niso nanašale le na rastline (npr. hrast, kresilno gobo) in naravno okolje (npr. psl. *kǫpa f. 'z drevjem poraščena vzpetina na močvirnatem svetu'), pač pa tudi na osnovne socialne termine (npr. psl. *čьlověkъ m. 'človek, moški, hlapec'; *mǫ̑ žь m. 'mož, moški').
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Computational Model of Long-Term Diachronic Change: Simulating the Development of Classical Latin to Modern French Clayton Marr Vassar College
    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2017 Towards a computational model of long-term diachronic change: simulating the development of Classical Latin to Modern French Clayton Marr Vassar College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Marr, Clayton, "Towards a computational model of long-term diachronic change: simulating the development of Classical Latin to Modern French" (2017). Senior Capstone Projects. 710. http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/710 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Towards A Computational Model of Long-Term Diachronic Change: Simulating the development of Classical Latin to Modern French Clayton Marr Vassar College May 1, 2017 Senior thesis submitted for fulfillment of the requirements for the Independent Major in Computational Linguistics First reader: Jan Andrews Second reader: Nancy Ide Table of Contents: 2 … 1. Abstract 3… 2. Introduction : Historical Phonology 4… 3. Major controversies in Historical Phonology 5… 3a. How does sound change? Neogrammarian regularism confronts lexical diffusionism 11… 3b. Why does sound change? Strict internalism confronts language contact effects 14… 4. Introduction : The French Language and Historical Phonology 16… 4a. Diachronic sound change and Neogrammarian regularity in French 17… 4b. Historical dialect and register relations in French 21… 4c. Language contact effects in French 28… 5. Computational models of diachronic change: reconstruction and simulation 30… 6. Description of this language simulation package 31… 6a.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae PAULA FREDRIKSEN BIRTHDATE
    Curriculum vitae PAULA FREDRIKSEN BIRTHDATE: 6 January 1951 ADDRESS: June-December January-June: 22 Hardy Lane 1, rehov Ehud Boscawen, NH 03303 USA 93502 Jerusalem, ISRAEL WEB PAGE: www.bu.edu/religion/faculty/fredriksen EDUCATION: 1979 Ph.D., Princeton University. History of Religions: Ancient Christianity; Graeco-Roman Religions. 1974 Theology Diploma, Oxford University. 1973 B.A., Wellesley College. Religion and History. DISSERTATION: "Augustine's Early Interpretations of Paul." POSITIONS HELD: 2009- Distinguished Visiting Professor, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem Aurelio Professor Emerita, Boston University 1990-2010 William Goodwin Aurelio Professor of the Appreciation of Scripture, Boston University 1986-89 Associate Professor, Department of Religious Studies, University of Pittsburgh 1980-86 Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of California, Berkeley 1979-80 Faculty, Department of Religious Studies, Stanford University 1978-79 Lecturer, Department of Religion, Princeton University GRANTS AND HONORS (selected): 2018 Prose Award, American Publishers’ Association, Best Book in Theology and Religion for Paul. The Pagans’ Apostle. Ph. D., honoris causa, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. Religious Studies PROSE Award, American Publishers Association. 2017 Ph. D., honoris causa, Faculty of Theology, Lund University, Sweden. 2014 Israel National Library, American board of governors (Treasurer). 2013 Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences. David L. Dungan Memorial Lecture, University of Tennessee at Knoxville. 2011 Nils Dahl Centenary Lecturer, University of Oslo, Norway. 2010 2010 Saint Augustine Lecturer, Villanova University, Villanova PA. Distinguished Visitors Lecturer, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel. City of God Lecturer, Center for Augustinian Study and Legacy, Merrimack College, MA. 2009 Sir Sigmund Sternberg Lecturer, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. Bernard Manekin Lecturer, Institute for Christian and Jewish Studies, Baltimore MD.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2013 Daniel Scott Diffey All Rights Reserved. the Southern
    Copyright © 2013 Daniel Scott Diffey All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. GIDEON’S RESPONSE AND JOTHAM’S FABLE: TWO ANTI-MONARCHIAL TEXTS IN A PRO-MONARCHIAL BOOK? __________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________________ by Daniel Scott Diffey December 2013 APPROVAL SHEET GIDEON’S RESPONSE AND JOTHAM’S FABLE: TWO ANTI-MONARCHIAL TEXTS IN A PRO-MONARCHIAL BOOK? Daniel Scott Diffey Read and Approved by: ___________________________________________ Duane A. Garrett (Chair) ___________________________________________ Russell T. Fuller ___________________________________________ T. J. Betts Date_______________________________ For Anne TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . vii PREFACE . x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 Statement of the Problem . 1 Contribution . 3 The Purpose of the Present Study . 6 Method . 7 Outline . 14 2. HISTORY OF INTERPRETATION . 18 Introduction . 18 Trends in the Study of Judges . 19 Trends in the Study of Monarchy in Judges . 24 Gideon’s Response and Jotham’s Fable . 31 Summary . 73 3. THE LIFE-SETTING OF THE BOOK OF JUDGES . 75 Introduction . 75 Explanatory and Chronological Notes . 76 iv Chapter Page Ideological Considerations . 88 The Life-Setting of Judges . 109 Conclusion . 112 4. THE IDEOLOGY OF MONARCHY IN JUDGES . 113 The Prologue: 1:1-3:6 . 114 The Body: 2:7-16:31 . 132 The Epilogue: 17:1-21:25 . 140 Conclusion . 148 5. GIDEON’S RESPONSE IN CONTEXT .
    [Show full text]
  • “Children of the Devil”: John 8:44 and Its Early Reception
    Adele Reinhartz “Children of the Devil”:John 8:44 and its Early Reception In 1971,the first year of my BA studies at the UniversityofToronto, Iread apow- erful book that has stayedwith me all these years: TheDevil and the Jews,by JoshuaTrachtenberg.¹ Trachtenbergwrote this book in 1943. Although he was liv- ing in the United States, he, likemost Jews around the world, was alarmed and upset about what his fellow Jews wereenduringinEurope, even though the full extent of those horrors werenot yetknown. As achild of Holocaust survivors, born some ten yearsafter Trachtenberg’sbook was published,Idid not need auniversity reading list to introduce me to the idea of antisemitism. But what struck me about Trachtenberg’sbook was the central role playedbythe associ- ation between the Jews and the devil, and its integralrelationship to ahost of other antisemitic tropes such as deicide, the blood libel, witchcraft,and sorcery. Although Trachtenbergacknowledgesthat Jews became associated with Satan in the first centuries of Christianity, his focus is primarilyonthe medieval period. It was not until Ibegan my doctoral work on the Gospel of John afew years later that Irealized that this association was present in John 8:44,in which Jesusdeclarestothe Jews: “Youare from your father the devil, and you choose to do your father’sdesires.” And why? Because,asserts Jesus, the Jews, like the devil, are murderers and liars. The historicalJesus did not actuallyutter these words. Rather,they were scripted for him by John’sauthor or authors as part of an anti-Jewish rhetoric that pervades this Gospel. Nevertheless,they were understood by the earlyread- ers of John as the authentic words of Jesus, and, for that reason, they wereall too easilymobilizedfor anti-Jewishpurposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cast out of the Covenant Jews and Anti-Judaism in the Gospel of John
    Cast Out of the Covenant Jews and Anti-Judaism in the Gospel of John Adele Reinhartz LEXINGTON BOOKS/FORTRESS ACADEMIC Lanham • Boulder • New York • London Reinhartz.indb 3 5/10/18 12:56 PM Contents Preface and Acknowledgments ix A Note on Terminology xiii Introduction xix PART I: THE RHETORIC OF AFFILIATION 1 “Ask and you will receive”: The Rhetoric of Desire and Fulfillment 3 2 “Love one another”: The Rhetoric of Transformation 23 PART II: THE RHETORIC OF DISAFFILIATION 3 “Casting off the withered branch”: The Rhetoric of Expropriation 51 4 “The world has hated you”: The Rhetoric of Repudiation 67 5 Rhetorical Ioudaioi and Real Jews 93 PART III: IMAGINING THE RHETORICAL SITUATION 6 “The Jews had already agreed”: J. L. Martyn and the Expulsion Theory 111 7 “We wish to see Jesus”: John, Alexandra, and the Propulsion Theory 131 vii Reinhartz.indb 7 5/10/18 12:56 PM viii Contents Conclusion 159 Bibliography 167 Index of Ancient Sources 189 Index of Modern Authors 199 Subject Index 201 About the Author 207 Reinhartz.indb 8 5/10/18 12:56 PM Introduction “Will you walk into my parlour?” said the Spider to the Fly, “‘Tis the prettiest little parlour that ever you did spy; The way into my parlour is up a winding stair, And I have many curious things to show you when you are there.” “Oh no, no,” said the little fly, “to ask me is in vain; For who goes up your winding stair can ne’er come down again.” The Spider and the Fly, Mary Howitt (1829)1 Some forty years ago, the Gospel of John beckoned me to enter its (decep- tively) pretty little parlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme with Abstracts
    Canadian Society of Biblical Studies Annual Meeting Réunion annuelle de la Société canadienne des études bibliques Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (Unless Otherwise Specified) May 28-31 Mai, 2003 Programme with Abstracts Wednesday, May 28 / Mercredi, 28 Mai 14:00-19:00 (Margaret Flahiff, Atlantic School of Theology) CSBS Executive Meeting / Réunion du Comité Exécutif Thursday, May 29 / Jeudi, 29 Mai 9:15-11:45 (Case 1, Management Building) New Testament: James and John / Nouveau Testament: Jacques et Jean Chair/Présidente: Edith Humphrey (Pittsburgh Theological Seminary) 9:15-9:45 John S. Kloppenborg (University of Toronto), “Jesus Traditions in James” That a strong relationship exists between the sayings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount and the letter of James has been long recognized, though it is not clear whether James knows the Sermon on the Mount, some predecessor text, or pre-Matthaean (or Q) tradition. This paper will examine the possible allusions to sayings of Jesus in James and compare their rhetorical function in James with their rhetorical function in Matthew, and will inquire into the way they function as proofs in relationship to other proofs in James’ argument. 9:45-10:15 Dina Teitelbaum (University of Ottawa), “The Jewish Ossuary Phenomenon: Cultural Receptivity in Roman Palestine” The origin of the ossuary is explained as a social move of a well-to-do segment in Jewish society emulating the imperial elite, rather than as an expression of belief in resurrection or redemption, as persistently claimed today. The employment of receptacles in secondary obsequies throughout the Greco-Roman world motivated Judaean society during Herod’s reign to introduce a receptacle into its indigenous funerary practices without shaking Jewish root principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Genadz Tsykhun the Etymological Commentary on Word
    CORE brought to you by Pobrane z czasopisma Studia Bia?orutenistyczne http://bialorutenistyka.umcs.pl Data: 04/03/2020 10:26:16 DOI:10.17951/sb.2019.13.297-309 Studia Białorutenistyczne 13/2019 Linguistics Genadz Tsykhun The National Academy of Sciences, Minsk (Belarus) View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7075-3994 The Etymological Commentary on Word Formation of Abstract Nouns with the Final Formant -ць Komentarz etymologiczny do derywacji rzeczowników abstrakcyjnych na -ць Этымалагічны каментар да словаўтварэння абстрактных назоўнікаў на -ць Abstract The article explores the word formation of abstract nouns with the final formant -ць in Belarusian. It also reveals the increased use of this formant in the sphere of concrete nouns. The group analysis of this word formation type allows the overcoming of the ‘formal isolation’ of a number of words and offer their etymologization. The research considers the origin of some words with the final -ць related to the field of natural phenomena (weather, climate, etc.): гогоць ‘ice on the trees’, голць ‘sleet with snow’, шаць ‘frost’, as well as some abstract nouns: dohać ‘consolation’, трэпяцьUMCS ‘something very white’, сыць ‘whimsicality’ etc. The class of the nouns, distinguished on formal grounds, continues the Proto-Slavic word-formation type but also demonstrates some innovative trends. The possibility of the language contacts’ influence on the word formation of the nouns with final -ць is stated. Keywords: abstract nouns, language contacts, the Belarusian language, word formation, formant -ць, etymology Abstrakt Przedmiotem analizy jest słowotwórstwo rzeczowników abstrakcyjnych języka białoruskie- go z formantem -ць.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loss of Case Inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian
    SLAVICA HELSINGIENSIA 47 THE LOSS OF CASE INFLECTION IN BULGARIAN AND MACEDONIAN Max Wahlström HELSINKI 2015 SLAVICA HELSINGIENSIA 47 Series editors Tomi Huttunen, Jouko Lindstedt, Ahti Nikunlassi Published by: Department of Modern Languages P.O. Box 24 (Unioninkatu 40 B) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland Copyright © by Max Wahlström ISBN 978-951-51-1185-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-1186-9 (PDF) ISSN-L 0780-3281, ISSN 0780-3281 (Print), ISSN 1799-5779 (Online) Summary Case inflection, characteristic of Slavic languages, was lost in Bulgarian and Macedonian approximately between the 11th and 16th centuries. My doctoral dissertation examines the process of this language change and sets out to find its causes and evaluate its consequences. In the earlier research literature, the case loss has been attributed either to language contacts or language internal sound changes, yet none of the theories based on a single explaining factor has proven satisfactory. In this study, I argue that the previous researchers of the Late Medieval manuscripts have often tried to date changes in the language earlier than what is plausible in light of the textual evidence. Also, I propose that the high number of second language speakers is among the key factors that reduced the number of morphological categories in the language, but, at the same time, several minor developments related to the case loss—for instance, in the marking of possession—are likely to result from a specific contact mechanism known as the Balkan linguistic area. My main methodological argument is that the study of language contacts must take into account a general typological perspective to determine the uniqueness of the suspected contact-induced changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Adele Reinhartz Has Been Named the Next General Editor of the Journal of Biblical Literature, SBL’S Flagship Journal
    Adele Reinhartz has been named the next General Editor of the Journal of Biblical Literature, SBL’s flagship journal. Her term (three years, renewable for a second term) will begin in 2012. She succeeds James C. VanderKam upon completion of his second term. As JBL editor, Reinhartz will be an ex officio member of the Research and Publications Committee. She will work with the 39-member JBL editorial board, as well as the SBL publications staff, to produce four annual issues. Reinhartz is Professor in the Department of Classics and Religious Studies, University of Ottawa, where she was also appointed associate vice-president, research, in 2005. Her awards and achievements include the following: President of the Canadian Society of Biblical Studies (1997-1998); Prize for Mentorship, SBL Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession (2003 and 2010); Rockefeller Foundation, Bellagio Residency (2004); Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada (inducted in 2005); and Fellow at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study (2011-2012). Reinhartz’s research includes early Christianity and Judaism, Johannine studies, Bible and film, and feminist biblical criticism. In addition to her awards and her distinguished publishing record, including Caiaphas the High Priest (University of South Carolina Press, 2011), Reinhartz has served the members of the Society of Biblical Literature in many capacities. She has been an Annual Meeting Program Unit Chair, a member of the Research and Publications Committee, and an editorial board member of JBL. Reinhartz also represents membership on Council, SBL’s governing board. Please express your appreciation and welcome to Adele Reinhartz as she takes on the leadership of a journal, first published in 1881, that has become the premier serial in biblical studies, representing the wide range of research methodologies SBL members practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Types of Ancient Indo-European Isoglosses in the Albanian Language
    UDC 809.198.3-02 Original Scholarly Work Vanja STANISIC Faculty of Philology Belgrade TWO TYPES OF ANCIENT INDO-EUROPEAN ISOGLOSSES IN THE ALBANIAN LANGUAGE Abstract Since a separate Indo-European feature of the Albanian lan­ guage has been discovered in the mid-19th century, reliable and gener­ ally accepted criteria for determining its ethno-liguistic connections were largely exhausted. Due to the comparatively late appearance of the Albanian language on the historical scene, on the one hand, and the absence of literary testaments of old-Balkan langauages on the other, the dispute on the origin of the Albanian language has been conducted for two centuries, with relatively moderate results. This paper attempts to view the question of Albanian ethno-linguistic ties in the light of new conclusions that have emerged in the comparative grammar of Indo-European languages. The fact that Albanian is spoken in territories inhabited in the past by Illyrian tribes has incited pioneers in Albanology to view it as a successor of the Illyrian language [1. Thunmann, Untersuchungen tiber die Geschichte der ostlichen europiiischcn Volker, Leipzig, 1774]. Be­ sides a similarity in the tribal names of the ancient and contemporary inhabitants of that part of the Balkans, the Illyrian 'AA~aVOt - the Alba­ nian arbcn/erber (with a void of eight centuries between them), lin­ guists have before them meager data which has itself been a subject of dispute and insufficient for any reliable judgment on the Illyrian lan­ guage. I An indisputable fact, nevertheless, is that the Albanian Ian- 1 Congruity between the names ofIllyrian tribes L1£/q.HX1;al - Dalmatae and Alb.
    [Show full text]