Conflicts of Eu Courts on Child Abduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conflicts of Eu Courts on Child Abduction CONTENT Country Reports May 2016 CONFLICTS OF EU COURTS ON CHILD ABDUCTION CONFLICTS OF EU COURTS ON CHILD ABDUCTION Table of Contents Researchers ..................................................................................................................... 5 Professor Paul Beaumont ......................................................................................................... 5 Dr Lara Walker ......................................................................................................................... 5 Jayne Holliday LLM .................................................................................................................. 5 The Project ...................................................................................................................... 5 Summary of findings ....................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................... 7 General Findings ...................................................................................................................... 8 Outcome ............................................................................................................................... 10 Hearing the Child ................................................................................................................... 11 The other requirements in Article 42 ...................................................................................... 12 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 13 Contact Information ............................................................................................................... 13 Austria .......................................................................................................................... 14 Belgium ......................................................................................................................... 25 Bulgaria......................................................................................................................... 45 Croatia .......................................................................................................................... 48 Cyprus ........................................................................................................................... 49 Czech Republic.............................................................................................................. 50 Estonia .......................................................................................................................... 52 Finland .......................................................................................................................... 53 France ........................................................................................................................... 54 Germany ....................................................................................................................... 66 Greece ........................................................................................................................... 77 Hungary ........................................................................................................................ 80 Ireland ........................................................................................................................... 84 Italy ............................................................................................................................... 98 Latvia .......................................................................................................................... 119 Lithuania ..................................................................................................................... 129 Luxembourg ................................................................................................................ 133 Malta ........................................................................................................................... 135 The Netherlands .......................................................................................................... 138 Poland ......................................................................................................................... 144 Portugal....................................................................................................................... 154 Romania ...................................................................................................................... 164 3 CONFLICTS OF EU COURTS ON CHILD ABDUCTION Slovakia ....................................................................................................................... 169 Slovenia ....................................................................................................................... 170 Spain ........................................................................................................................... 175 Sweden ........................................................................................................................ 184 UK ............................................................................................................................... 187 England and Wales ............................................................................................................... 187 Northern Ireland .................................................................................................................. 212 Scotland .............................................................................................................................. 214 Drawing on the front cover is ‘Justice and the Child’ by Jayne Holliday © 4 CONFLICTS OF EU COURTS ON CHILD ABDUCTION Researchers Professor Paul Beaumont Chair in Private International Law and EU Law at the University of Aberdeen, Director of the Centre for Private International Law, University of Aberdeen. Dr Lara Walker Lecturer in Law at the University of Sussex and Associate Member of the Centre for Private International Law, University of Aberdeen. Jayne Holliday LLM Research Assistant and Secretary of the Centre for Private International Law, University of Aberdeen. The Project Professor Paul Beaumont of the University of Aberdeen, in collaboration with Dr Lara Walker of the University of Sussex, received funding from the Nuffield Foundation to carry out empirical research on Child Abduction in the European Union. The project started on 1st April 2014 for a period of 20 months. This project aimed to look at cases where a non-return had been ordered by the state of refuge under Article 13 of the Hague Child Abduction Convention 1980. In particular, it aimed to assess how Brussels IIa Regulation no 2201/2003 was being interpreted in cases in the EU where the courts of the habitual residence of an abducted child override the non-return order of the courts in the State where the child was abducted by making an Article 11(8) return order. The research also sought to determine whether the parties and the child had been heard in the courts of the habitual residence of the child, in accordance with a right to a fair trial, and whether those courts had taken adequate account of the reasons given for non-return by the court of refuge. In addition, the distinction between a return order and a custody order in the State of the habitual residence of the child was addressed, through examination of the relevant case-law. In light of the impending review of the Brussels IIa Regulation, the objective of the project was to determine how the Regulation was being applied in these particular cases, whether there was a uniform approach in the differing jurisdictions and whether the recommendations in the Commission’s Practice Guide were being adhered to. We also considered what changes to recommend to the Brussels IIa Regulation and/or the Commission’s Practice Guide. The overall findings from the research are found at “Conflicts of EU courts on child abduction: the reality of Article 11(6)-(8) Brussels IIa proceedings across the EU” (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law (forthcoming). 5 CONFLICTS OF EU COURTS ON CHILD ABDUCTION Summary of findings Methodology A pilot questionnaire was sent to the German Central Authority and to ICACU. A detailed response was received from Dr Andrea Schulz at the German Central Authority for which we are grateful. The revised questionnaire was distributed to all Central Authorities in May 2014 requesting data in relation to Article 11(6)-(8) Brussels IIa proceedings following on from a non-return order under Article 13 of the Hague Child Abduction Convention in the period between the entry into force of Brussels IIa and 28 February 2014. Most Central Authorities provided some information, whether it was a full response to the questionnaire, a partial response to the questionnaire or general statistical data. No information was provided by the Central Authorities of Greece, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and England and Wales. The information gathered from Central Authorities was supplemented by data, case files and case summaries provided by native researchers
Recommended publications
  • Judenburg, Austria
    JUDENBURG DISTRICT HEATING GRID BASED Best Practice Factsheet ON WASTE HEAT FROM ###9#999 PULP &PAPER MILL Judenburg, Austria District heating grid based on waste heat from pulp&paper mill Zellstoff Pöls AG DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION The Zellstoff Pöls AG annually processes approximately 2 million cubic meters of thinning wood and sawn timber into both pulp and paper. Together with the know-how partner "Bioenergie Wärmeservice Gmbh” from Köflach, an expert for district heating and waste heat recovery systems, a joint venture was formed into the company “Biowärme Aichfeld Gmbh”. The objective was to use the waste heat sensibly, in combination with an existing biomass heating plant and a storage solution with large-district- pressure reservoirs. The result allows for a sustainable, environmentally friendly and regional heat supply for more than 15,000 households in the greater Aichfeld area. For this purpose, the joint venture partners invested € 18 million and laid over 18 km of piping for the district heating project. This is a heat grid infrastructure project, to connect the cities, business and industrials parks in the region. The cities, business and industrial parks are served by ESCOS, which take over the heat from the infrastructure heat grid, and distribute the heat to the customers. Project supported by the Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Programme and funded under the European Regional Development Fund. JUDENBURG DISTRICT HEATING GRID BASED Best Practice Factsheet ON WASTE HEAT FROM ###9#999 PULP &PAPER MILL PARTNERS INVOLVED Zellstoff Pöls AG and Biowärme Wärmeservice GmbH form the Biowärme Aichfeld GmbH, which is the operator of the infrastructure heat grid, connecting the sub-heat grids of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan As an Immediate Relative, to Determine Whether a Child Who Has Been Or Will Be Adopted by a U.S
    Instructions for Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative USCIS Form I-600 Department of Homeland Security OMB No. 1615-0028 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Expires 12/31/2021 What Is the Purpose of Form I-600? U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) uses the information provided on Form I-600, Petition to Classify Orphan as an Immediate Relative, to determine whether a child who has been or will be adopted by a U.S. citizen (and spouse, if married) can be classified as an orphan for an immediate relative immigrant visa. Who May File Form I-600? If you are a U.S. citizen, you (and your spouse, if married) may file Form I-600 for an unmarried child if: 1. You file the Form I-600 before the child’s 16th birthday (or before the child’s 18th birthday in some cases, as discussed in these Instructions); 2. The child’s adoption is not governed by the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention); 3. The child qualifies as an orphan, as defined in the Immigration and NationalityAct (INA) section 101(b)(1)(F); and 4. You (and your spouse, if married) either: A. Have adopted the child outside the United States and the adoption order is final; or B. Have obtained legal custody of the child for emigration and adoption in the United States and will adopt the child in the United States after the child enters the country with a visa. To qualify as an adoption for immigration purposes, the adoption must, according to the laws where it takes place, establish a permanent legal parent-child relationship between the child and you (and your spouse, if married), as well as terminate the legal parent-child relationship between the child and any former parent(s).
    [Show full text]
  • 39 DOUZELAGE CONFERENCE SIGULDA 24 April – 27 April 2014
    AGROS (CY) ALTEA (E) ASIKKALA (FIN) th BAD KÖTZTING (D) 39 DOUZELAGE CONFERENCE BELLAGIO (I) BUNDORAN (IRL) CHOJNA (PL) GRANVILLE (F) HOLSTEBRO (DK) HOUFFALIZE (B) JUDENBURG (A) SIGULDA KÖSZEG (H) MARSASKALA (MT) MEERSSEN (NL) NIEDERANVEN (L) OXELÖSUND (S) th th PREVEZA (GR) 24 April – 27 April 2014 PRIENAI (LT) SESIMBRA (P) SHERBORNE (GB) SIGULDA (LV) SIRET (RO) SKOFIA LOKA (SI) MINUTES SUŠICE (CZ) TRYAVNA (BG) TÜRI (EST) ZVOLEN (SK) DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION PARTICIPANTS AGROS Andreas Latzias Metaxoula Kamana Alexis Koutsoventis Nicolas Christofi ASIKKALA Merja Palokangos-Viitanen Pirjo Ala-Hemmila Salomaa Miika BAD KOTZTING Wolfgang Kershcer Agathe Kerscher Isolde Emberger Elisabeth Anthofer Saskia Muller-Wessling Simona Gogeissl BELLAGIO Donatella Gandola Arianna Sancassani CHOJNA Janusz Cezary Salamończyk Norbert Oleskow Rafał Czubik Andrzej Będzak Anna Rydzewska Paweł Woźnicki BUNDORAN Denise Connolly Shane Smyth John Campbell GRANVILLE Fay Guerry Jean-Claude Guerry HOLSTEBRO Jette Hingebjerg Mette Grith Sorensen Lene Bisgaard Larsen Victoria Louise Tilsted Joachim Peter Tilsted 2 DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION HOUFFALIZE Alphonse Henrard Luc Nollomont Mathilde Close JUDENBURG Christian Fuller Franz Bachmann Andrea Kober Theresa Hofer Corinna Haasmann Marios Agathocleous KOSZEG Peter Rege Kitti Mercz Luca Nagy Aliz Pongracz MARSASKALA Mario Calleja Sandro Gatt Charlot Mifsud MEERSSEN Karel Majoor Annigje Luns-Kruytbosch Ellen Schiffeleers Simone Borm Bert Van Doorn Irene Raedts NIEDERANVEN Jos
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Orphan Report
    Ք REPORT Ք HUMAN RIGHTS 2021 ORPHAN REPORT APRIL 2021 CANSU NAR www.insamer.com [email protected] www.ihh.org.tr/en APRIL 2021 REPORT 2021 Orphan Report Report Human Rights April 2021 Prepared By Cansu Nar Executive Editor Dr. Ahmet Emin Dağ Editor Mervenur Lüleci Karadere For citation: Nar, Cansu. 2021 Orphan Report, INSAMER Report, April 2021. Responsibility for the information and views set out in this publication lies entirely with the authors. ©INSAMER 2021 All rights are reserved. The use of quotations is allowed only by providing reference. Nuhun Gemisi Cover and Page Design Nurgül Ersoy Printing: Pelikan Basım Ulubatlı Hasan Caddesi No. 2 H D Blok No. 19 Başakşehir – Istanbul INSAMER is a research center of IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation. HUMAN RIGHTS 2 iii CONTENTS Orphan and Orphanhood 1 Social Orphanhood and Child Abuse 5 State of Orphans in the World 8 Orphans as Victims of War 13 Vulnerable Child Refugees 14 Children With Real Weapons Made 16 of Iron Instead of Toys Consequences of Child Poverty 17 Child Labor 19 Babylift Operations Continue 21 The Forgotten Ones During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Child 23 Refugees Refugees and Global Child Trade 25 Importance of Education for 29 Orphans Endnotes 32 Annex - IHH Orphan Aid Activity 35 Karagümrük Mh. Kaleboyu Cd. Muhtar Muhittin Sk. No:6 PK.34091 Fatih / İstanbul - TURKEY www.insamer.com • info.insamer.com APRIL 2021 REPORT ORPHAN AND ORPHANHOOD One definition of orphan all cultures agree their parents or both. In the Islamic on is a pre-adolescent child who has lost tradition, a paternal orphan is a child who has lost a father while a mater- either of their parents or both.
    [Show full text]
  • 32Nd Douzelage Conference SESIMBRA (P) SHERBORNE (GB) SIGULDA (LV) SUŠICE (CZ) TÜRI (EST) ZVOLEN (SK) TÜRI
    ALTEA (E) BAD KÖTZTING (D) BELLAGIO (I) BUNDORAN (IRL) CHOJNA (PL) GRANVILLE (F) HOLSTEBRO (DK) HOUFFALIZE (B) JUDENBURG (A) KARKKILA (FIN) KÖSZEG (H) MEERSSEN (NL) NIEDERANVEN (L) OXELÖSUND (S) PRIENAI (LT) PREVEZA (GR) 32nd Douzelage Conference SESIMBRA (P) SHERBORNE (GB) SIGULDA (LV) SUŠICE (CZ) TÜRI (EST) ZVOLEN (SK) TÜRI 8th - 11th May 2008 Draft Minutes DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION PARTICIPANTS 1 = GENERAL MEETING, 2 = EDUCATION MEETING, 3 = YOUTH WORKSHOP, 4 = VISITOR, 5 = INTERPRETER, 6 = LECTURER ALTEA MRS PEPA PERLES1 MRS MARIA JARAVA2 MRS GEMA CORCOLES2 MRS ROSA MARÍA ROSELLO1 MRS PEPA NARBO2 MRS Mª ANGELES BERENGUER1 MRS Mª PEPA ROSTOLL1 BAD KÖTZTING MR GÜNTHER PECHER1 MRS BARBARA WENDL3 MRS EVA MAURER1 MR BENEDIKT SEIDL3 MRS PETRA HOHAUS2 MRS ELKE PECHER4 MR CHRISTIAN DREHER2 BELLAGIO MRS DONATELLA GANDOLA1 MRS FIOELLA CATANIA1 BUNDORAN 1 MR JOE MC NULTY1 MRS DENISE CONNOLLY CHOJNA 3 MR ADAM FEDOROWICZ1 MR STANISLAW SLODKOWSKI 2 MR WOJCIECH DLUGOBORSKI1 MR JUSTYNA SIWEK MR CEZARY SALAMONCZYK1 GRANVILLE 5 MR ANDRÉ GENDRE1 MRS FAY GUERRY 5 MR JEAN-ALAIN SAOUL1 MR JEAN-CLAUDE GUERRY 3 MRS DELPHINE BOUGEARD2 MRS ELISABETH GUERRY MR ALEXANDRE DOUVRY3 MRS ANNE-SOPHIE GAUTHIER3 HOLSTEBRO 1 MRS METTE SORENSEN1 MRS LENE VESELY HOUFFALIZE MR ALPHONSE HENRARD1 MR MAXIME CLOSE3 MRS MARIE DUBOIS1 MRS ANNE REDOTTE 3 MR LUC NOLLOMONT1;2 MR MATHIEU CLOSE2 JUDENBURG MR WILLY SCHNEDL2 MR MARTIN SIX3 MRS ISA PAUMGARTNER1 MR MIKE LANGGNER3 MRS ANDREA KOBER1 KARKKILA NOT ATTENDING 2 DOUZELAGE – EUROPEAN TOWN TWINNING ASSOCIATION
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Story Zellstoff Pöls PM3
    SUCCESS STORY Europe‘s largest new kraft paper machine with the world‘s largest steel Yankee PULP & PAPER ZELLSTOFF PÖLS AG PÖLS PM2 AND PM3, AUSTRIA Gathering impressions – Being part of the Heinzel The Murtal region Group: Zellstoff Pöls AG The market town of Pöls is located in the political district of Murtal The Heinzel Group is one of the largest producers of market pulp in the Austrian federal province of Styria. in Central and Eastern Europe. Ruin of Reifenstein Castle, © David Bauer Heinzel Group, Zellstoff Pöls AG The Murtal region, with its main towns Judenburg, Heinzel Group, which is united under umbrella of Heinzel Holding, is Knittelfeld, Murau, and Pöls, offers several holiday MARKET TOWN PÖLS — KEY FACTS: one of the largest producers of market pulp and packaging papers attractions the whole year round. It not only has the in Central and Eastern Europe with its industrial locations Zellstoff picturesque countryside for great adventures in • Inhabitants: approx. 2,390 Pöls, Laakirchen Papier (both Austria), Raubling Papier (Germany) and summer and winter, but also Austria’s only Formula • Size: 33.37 km2 Estonian Cell (Estonia). Magazine paper rounds off the group’s range. One race track — the Red Bull Ring in Spielberg — • Main industries: that attracts high-speed fans as well! pulp and paper production, forestry Its trading area includes Wilfried Heinzel AG, a globally active pulp, paper and board trading company, and Europapier International AG, The market town of Pöls lies between the southern the leading paper wholesale company in Central and Eastern Europe. foothills of the Rottenmanner and Wölzer Tauern and In addition it houses Bunzl & Biach, which is the largest and most the Seckauer Alps in the valley of the River Pöls.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Characteristics of Adolescents Orphans with Different Experience of Living in a Family
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 17, 10493-10504 OPEN ACCESS Psychological Characteristics of Adolescents Orphans with Different Experience of Living in a Family Tatyana I. Shulgaa, Daria D. Savchenkoa and Evgeniya B. Filinkovaa a Moscow State Regional University, Moscow, RUSSIA ABSTRACT The complexity of settling adolescents-orphans in foster families and significant number of break-downs in these families are the problems which determine the relevance of current research. Many adolescent orphans get in social institutions repeatedly, because their psychological features lead to difficulties that their foster parents are unable to cope with. These features hereby need to be thoroughly studied. This article presents the study of psychological features of adolescents with different experiences of living in a family. Research complex of 17 psycho-diagnostic methods allowed to reveal specific differences in psychology of adolescents-orphans without experience of living in a family, compared with adolescents who live in orphan institutions, but have the experience of living in a family and with adolescents living in a family since their birth. It was found that family deprivation violates psychological development of adolescents. The violation manifests itself in the specificity of their emotional intelligence and regulatory functions, reduction of social intelligence and level of sociability, as well as in specific self-image (negative self-attitude, uncertainty, distrust of the world, particular attitude to the future and the prospects of life, etc.) and perception of the other (distorted attitude towards the family and its members, negative view of parent-child relationship and child functions, etc.). The results obtained are of interest for children psychologists and social workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeschooling Families Adapt to Adoption A
    EMBRACING GROWTH Homeschooling families adapt to adoption A WIT Y R T EN B LEE ANN BISULCA {}C ROVER STO Y “In many cases involving kids adopted past infancy—the adoptive parents are learning brand-new parenting skills and are navigating very challenging terrain.” SK ALMOST ANY HOMESCHOOLING PARENT WHY he or she homeschools,A and the answer will most likely include a reason that has to do Awith family. Through homeschooling, parents have a unique opportunity to build close bonds with their children, promote healthy sibling relationships, and create a rich, loving family culture that is foundational for their children’s adultA lives. Ask almost any adoptive homeschooling parents why they adopted, and their answer will probably be similar. Having experienced the blessing of family through homeschooling, they want to share that blessing with children who might not otherwise have the chance. With adoption’s rising profile in the homeschooling community, more fami- RN U B lies are eager to adopt, and they’re open to adopting older children, children O H T K R A / M / from other countries, and sibling groups. However, as some families are dis- A D L S covering, welcoming a new child into a home can involve complex, sometimes ON:© H I T A R T S deeply painful, challenges. E V CO RILLU SPRING 2013 • THE HOME SCHOOL COURT REPORT 9 that can be handled with typical disciplinary approaches. Yet Adoption, homeschooling, and HSLDA with an adopted child, it may be a bigger issue beneath the sur- s a staff attorney at Home School Legal Defense Associ- face.
    [Show full text]
  • Asha for Education Project Proposal Submission Form 1
    Asha for Education Project Proposal Submission Form 1 Project Name: A Home, Education, and Rehabilitation of Orphan Girls, Date: April 19th Project Contact Asha Contact Name Dr. Michelle Harrison Suresh Metla Address Childlife Preserve:Shishur Sevay 17/2/7, Sahapur Main Road Kolkata-700038 Phone(s) Tel:/91.33.2498.1120/ (m)9830240182 Fax E-mail [email protected] [email protected] Part I: Information about your group/organization Please feel free to attach any additional sheets and/or information such as brochures, press reports etc. 1. Name of the group/organization requesting funds. Childlife Preserve Shishur Sevay 2. When was the group established? June 14, 2006 3. Briefly describe the motivation for starting this group. The society was formed with the specific purpose to protect orphans and abandoned children by providing a safe environment where they will be sheltered, nurtured and educated in ways that build competence, confidence and independence. This group was identified because they lack advocates, are usually institutionalized in government homes, are uneducated, and unprepared for life outside an institution when they leave. Therefore they are rarely seen as credible advocates for their group. 4. Briefly describe the aims of your group. 1.To identify the needs of the orphan children. 2.To serve as a model of non-institutional care for the orphaned girls. 3.To demonstrate the benefits of, "INCLUSION,"i.e-inclusive living of the orphan girls and the orphaned handicapped children. 4.To intensively educate the children who had no previous education. 5.To organize and run Shishur Sevay as a Theraputic Environment, operating on principles of compassion and discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Units of the Alpine Convention Alpine the of Units Administrative Alpine Signals 1 Signals Alpine 21
    Administrative Units of the Alpine Convention Administrative Units Alpine signals 1 21 Scope of application of the Alpine Convention Administrative Units LIST OF ADMINistrative UNITS OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION IN 1) According to the Federal Official Journal (of the Republic of Austria) THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA III vol. 18/1999 from 01.28.1999. Federal state of Strobl Weißpriach VORARLBERG Thalgau Zederhaus all municipalities Wals-Siezenheim District of Zell am See F e d e r a l s t a t e o f T Y R O L District of Sankt Johann im Pongau Bramberg am Wildkogel all municipalities Altenmarkt im Pongau Bruck an der Großglockner- straße Bad Hofgastein Federal state of Dienten am Hochkönig CARINTHIA Badgastein Bischofshofen Fusch an der Großglockner- all municipalities straße Dorfgastein Hollersbach im Pinzgau Eben im Pongau Federal state of Kaprun SALZBURG Filzmoos Flachau Krimml Lend Salzburg (town area) Forstau Goldegg Leogang District of Hallein Großarl Lofer Hüttau Maishofen Abtenau Maria Alm am Steinernen Adnet Hüttschlag Kleinarl Meer Annaberg im Lammertal Mittersill Golling an der Salzach Mühlbach am Hochkönig Pfarrwerfen Neukirchen am Großvene- Hallein diger Krispl Radstadt Sankt Johann im Pongau Niedernsill Kuchl Piesendorf Oberalm Sankt Martin am Tennen- gebirge Rauris Puch bei Hallein Saalbach-Hinterglemm Rußbach am Paß Gschütt Sankt Veit im Pongau Schwarzach im Pongau Saalfelden am Steinernen Sankt Koloman Meer Scheffau am Tennengebirge Untertauern Sankt Martin bei Lofer Vigaun Wagrain Stuhlfelden District Werfen Taxenbach Salzburg/Surrounding
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Curfew
    THE WESTERN CURFEW © Moira Rayner www.moirarayner.com.au . The Western Curfew was published in The Indigenous Law Bulletin December 2003 In April 2003 Dr Geoff Gallop, the Labor Premier of Western Australia, announced without warning that his government would enforce an after-dark curfew on all under-18- year-olds, unless they were accompanied by their parents, in the central city entertainment precinct known as Northbridge. At the same time he released a report of a recent crackdown by police in the area, in which nearly 450 children were taken off the streets over a 12 week period. More than 400 of these children were Aboriginal kids from the outer suburbs, and more than two thirds of those, young girls. The Curfew was extremely popular with the local tabloid newspaper and most radio and talkback commentary, but it had been a big surprise to the Department for Community Development (responsible for child protection), the Department of Indigenous Affairs, ATSIC, the Police Commissioner, and just about everybody in government, other than the police officer who wrote the internal report and one of the Premier’s advisers. The Premier had not consulted non government service providers working with young people in the inner city, the City of Perth or its youth consultative council, or any of the committees that had been working for a considerable time to address the acknowledged and longstanding problem of indigenous children and young people inappropriately visiting, remaining and occasionally even ‘misbehaving’ in the precinct. Northbridge business proprietors and the local tabloid loved the idea: researchers, policy makers, lawyers, judges and non government agencies working with children were very concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Orphan in Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights and Bleak House
    THE PASSIONATE REBEL: THE FEMALE ORPHAN IN JANE EYRE, WUTHERING HEIGHTS AND BLEAK HOUSE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in English By Ruoqi Shi, B.A. Washington, DC April 24, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Ruoqi Shi All Rights Reserved ii THE PASSIONATE REBEL: THE FEMALE ORPHAN IN JANE EYRE, WUTHERING HEIGHTS AND BLEAK HOUSE Ruoqi Shi, B.A. Thesis Advisor: John C. Pfordresher, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The aim of this thesis is to to address the critical significance of the female orphan in Victorian novels, and in particular, in three mid-Victorian novels: Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (1847), Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights (1847), and Charles Dickens’s Bleak House (1853). This thesis seeks to examine the manner in which the female orphan serves to be more disruptive and destructive than a pharmakon. Then, it argues that the rebellious female orphan, instead of carrying out restoration of normalcy, must either leave or destroy the old house of patriarchy she enters into, and establishes the new order in her new home. I divide this thesis into three chapters. In the first chapter, I read Jane Eyre’s progress in Jane Eyre as a rebellious text. I begin with the examination of her early experience in the Reed family as a dependent orphan and isolated outlier. When she starts to put up opposition to her cousin John Reed, she becomes extremely threatening and seizes her destructive power over the patriarchal household.
    [Show full text]