Asbmb Goes to China
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASBMB ANNOUNCES 2008 AWARD WINNERS September 2007 ASBMB GOES TO CHINA American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Scientists helping scientists… It costs no more to choose the very best for your custom peptides and antibodies… Ac-C T P R Q I pS F N F K-OH All peptides are made in our laboratories 1461.640 with the most rigorous QC in the industry – pSFNFK-H3PO4 -98 623.245 We sequence every purified -H PO peptide we manufacture! 3 4 PhD scientists with over 70 years of 623.0 626.5 combined experience in Chemistry, Mass 293.141 72 Cell Biology and Immunology 1218.599 1169.510 1347.658 536.784 740.405 809.426 1317.591 6 246.072 499.227 972.531 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Mass Complete antibody protocols and no hidden charges. Phosphospecific antibody experts! Custom peptides up to 100 AAs in length and at purities up to >98%. Peptides for epitope mapping as low as $4/AA. Modifications include phosphorylated amino acids, dye-labeling, cyclic peptides, and peptides with stable isotopes. Experience for yourself why research scientists around the world trust 21st Century Biochemicals for their custom peptides and antibodies! Come speak with our scientists at: Biomedical Research Equipment and Supplies Exhibit at Harvard Medical School Sept. 19 – 20 Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA Nov. 3 – 7 American Society for Cell Biology, Washington, DC Dec. 1 – 5 www.21stcenturybio.com 260 Cedar Hill Street, Marlboro, MA 01752 Made in the P: 508.303.8222 Toll-free: 877.217.8238 F: 508.303.8333 E: [email protected] U.S.A. contents SEPTEMBER 2007 ON THE COVER: A delegation of seven representa- tives from ASBMB recently visited society news Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai 2 President’s Message where they met with Chinese sci- entists, students, and members of 6 Washington Update the Society’s counterpart in China. 7 New JBC Minireview 12 Compendium on Interferons 10 Retrospective: Daniel E. Koshland Jr. special interest 12 ASBMB Delegation Tours China 14 Early Medical Research Funding and the Evolution of Modern American Biochemistry 2008 meeting overview 16 Systems Biology: a shared goal with diverse views 18 The Diverse Aspects of Protein Synthesis and Degradation 20 A Renaissance for Metabolism Research compendium. 7 22 RNA: From Atom to Organism 23 ASBMB Taps 8 Scientists and 1 Politician for Top Awards science focus 27 Maurice Swanson: Finding New Cures for Muscular Dystrophy 30 Matthias Mann: Using Proteomics to Understand Protein Interactions departments 4 News from the Hill 8 Member Spotlight 24 Career Insights 26 Education and Training 32 BioBits resources 34 For Your Lab 35 Career Opportunities 36 Scientific Meeting Calendar e transcription cttor two-step. 32 September 2007 ASBMB Today 1 president’smessage A monthly publication of The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Peer Review Front Officers Heidi E. Hamm President and Center Gregory A. Petsko President-Elect BY HEIDI HAMM Mark A. Lemmon Secretary Merle S. Olson Treasurer Council Members Alan Hall Kuan-Teh Jeang Suzanne R. Pfeffer Linda J. Pike John D. Scott Joan A. Steitz Kevin Struhl James A. Wells t’s great to be back from a very Groups (IRGs). (More information is Ex-Officio Members Iproductive and interesting trip to given at cms.csr.nih.gov/AboutCSR/ Ellis Bell China with our ASBMB delegation. We OpenHouses.htm.) The open house on Chair, Education and Professional met our goals of establishing a closer Biomolecular IRGs, which is particu- Development Committee Laurie S. Kaguni relationship with Chinese scientists in larly relevant to ASBMB, will be held on Chair, Meeting Committee biochemistry and molecular biology, December 18. George Hill and we were delighted with the warm The Panel on Scientific Boundaries Chair, Minority Affairs Committee Kendall J. Blumer and enthusiastic welcome we received. for Review, headed by Bruce Alberts, Anna Marie Pyle I am sure you have been hearing undertook the latest reorganization Co-chairs, 2008 Program Committee about the many calls for information of study sections. I have been work- Mary J. C. Hendrix Chair, Public Affairs Advisory Committee from the National Institutes of Health ing closely with Bruce for a couple of Robert E. Rhoads (NIH) on many topics. One which is years on the issue of how to influence Chair, Publications Committee dear to our hearts is peer review. It’s the CSR to have more ongoing input Herbert Tabor Editor, JBC good to see that the NIH is making a from extramural scientists on how study Ralph A. Bradshaw major effort to examine the peer review sections are functioning. This ongoing A. L. Burlingame process. This critical reexamination fo interaction has led to a proposal for the Co-editors, MCP Edward A. Dennis the peer review system has been a high two societies to work together to provide Editor, JLR priority of ASBMB, prompted by the our input to the CSR. Thus, the two ASBMB Today crisis in funding and resultant doubling societies will jointly analyze the makeup Editorial Advisory Board of NIH grant applications over recent and scope of the study sections that are Alex Toker years. A key reason for this reassessment of most interest to the two societies, Chair is to be sure the system is operating as it determine whether there is sufficient Mike Autry Greg P. Bertenshaw Craig E. Cameron A. Stephen Dahms was meant to after the last major over- breadth, expertise, and balance between Irwin Fridovich Richard W. Hanson haul instigated by the Panel on Scientific basic and clinical investigators, etc. Our Elizabeth A. Komives Bettie Sue Masters Luke A. O’Neill Boundaries for Review almost 7 years analysis will be provided to the CSR at Duanqing Pei Carol C. Shoulders ago. Of course, we hope that completely this open house. If you are willing to be Robert D. Wells new ideas will emerge from this reex- involved in this analysis, please let me ASBMB Today amination to help us overcome the real or Mary Hendrix, chair of the Public Nicole Kresge Editor crisis in peer review that has resulted Affairs Advisory Committee, know of [email protected] from the lack of investment in biomedi- your interest! In particular, we need Pat Pages Science Writer [email protected] cal research over the last 5 years. ASBMB members who have served on Nancy J. Rodnan Director of Publications A number of activities to assess these study sections recently, as they are [email protected] Barbara Gordon Executive Director peer review are underway. Toni Scarpa, the real experts on how well the study [email protected] director of the Center for Scientific sections are working. Magazine design & production: Amy Phifer Review (CSR), announced a series of Additionally, a Working Group of For information on advertising contact open houses to give the extramural the NIH Advisory Committee to the FASEB AdNet at 800-433-2732 ext. 7157 or community a chance to voice their views Director, focusing on a review of the 301-634-7157, or E-mail [email protected]. on the quality and expertise of various current peer review system at NIH, met study sections and Integrated Review in Washington, D.C. on July 30 to hear www.asbmb.org September 2007 comments from the scientific com- Working Group co-chairs Lawrence We hope all of you with an inter- munity. ASBMB President-Elect Greg Tabak, director of the National Institute est in the NIH peer review system will Petsko delivered ASBMB’s comments, of Dental and Craniofacial Research, bookmark this site and visit it regularly which covered 4 main points: and Keith Yamamoto, University of to keep abreast of what is going on. Oversight of study sections should California, San Francisco, noted in The Working Group will be accepting be ongoing. The Center for Scientific their July 12 letter to the commu- comments from concerned members Review must monitor the IRGs and nity about the group that “With the of the biomedical research community; study sections to ensure that they are increasing breadth and complexity of the NIH also currently has a request functioning as they should, and make science, along with the rising number for information on the NIH System to changes as appropriate based on feed- of research grant applications, we are Support Biomedical and Behavioral back from both members of the study Research and Peer Review (grants.nih. sections and those whose proposals are gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT- reviewed there. Critical OD-07-084.html). Senior researchers should continue reexamination In his opening remarks, Yama- to serve on study sections. ASBMB moto noted that there had been many also recommended that assistant of the peer review changes in peer review since he became professors not serve on study sections. involved in the mid-1980s. In 1987, Petsko recommended that senior system is a high there were only 1,800 people serving researchers be compelled to serve on priority of ASBMB on study sections. Now, that figure has study sections, similar to serving on grown by an order of magnitude— juries when called upon. As he noted, 18,000 scientists are currently serving. “holding a federal grant is a privilege, taking a comprehensive look at our Furthermore, the nature of science is not a right,” and thus those who hold review process to ensure its continued different; the scope of applications is them should be expected to pay back strength for applicants and reviewers much broader than 20 years ago. the system by study section service if alike. We would like you to participate Yamamoto went on to note that called upon. in this discussion.” NIH Director Elias the review process must evolve and Study section membership must fit Zerhouni was in attendance the entire adapt to these changes.