Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region South Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region South Australia Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region South Australia PrioriTies, STraTegies anD TargeTS HERO IMAGE - ONE IMAGE ONLY NO COLLAGES June 2010 Department for Environment and Heritage www.environment.sa.gov.au Acknowledgements The Department for Environment and Heritage coordinated the preparation of this document. It is the culmination of several years project work, representing contributions from numerous individuals, agencies and other organisations. The Department would like to acknowledge the many people and organisations who contributed to the development of this report. Early drafts were compiled by Monique Blason and Sandy Carruthers. The primary author of the current version of the strategy is Lisa Farroway. Significant contributions to the finalisation of this version were made by Andrew Willson and Beatrice Hurrell. The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the efforts and support of various steering committee members including Wendy Stubbs, Brenton Grear, Jody Gates, Andrew West, Adrian Stokes, Chris Morony and Ben Moulton. Other individuals who provide valuable expertise are Amelia Hurren, Julia Bignall, Ben Fee, Glen Sholtz and staff of DEH’s Adelaide Region Biodiversity Conservation Unit. All information in this report was correct at the time of printing. Except where otherwise indicated, all figures and photographs have been provided by the Department for Environment and Heritage. Cover photo - silky tea tree (Leptospermum lanigerum) swamp and candle bark forest (Eucalyptus dalrympleana ssp. dalrympleana), Sinclair’s Gully, Norton Summit. Photo by Sonia Croft. Citation: DEH (2009) Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region, South Australia. Priorities, Strategies and Targets. © Department for Environment and Heritage Produced by the Corporate Communications Branch All rights reserved June 2010 FIS 90346 ISBN 978-1-921466-36-6 Contents PART 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose and scope 1 1.2 Region description 4 PART 2 Biodiversity State and condition 7 2.1 What the region previously looked like 8 2.2 What the region currently looks like 9 PART 3 Approaches and framework for conservation 16 3.1 Impacts of modification and landscape change on biodiversity 16 3.2 Conservation planning principles 17 PART 4 Conservation of biodiversity 23 4.1 Conservation of terrestrial and coastal biodiversity 23 4.1.1 Conservation of landscapes 26 Fragmented high cover landscapes 28 Disproportionately cleared fragmented landscapes 30 Recently fragmented landscapes 34 Presumed fragmented landscapes 37 Fragmented coastal landscapes 40 Relictual landscapes 44 4.1.2 Conservation of ecological communities 47 Conservation targets for ecological communities 52 Heathy forest 55 Heathy woodland 57 Shrubland 60 Grassy woodlands 62 Grassland 66 Mallee 68 Riparian 71 Wetland 75 Coastal vegetation 77 4.1.3 Conservation of species 90 Threatened species 90 Declining species 95 Endemic species 96 Abundant native species and native species in conflict 98 4.1.4 Aquatic ecosystem conservation programs 103 4.2 Mitigation of threatening processes 109 PART 5 Stakeholders 114 PART 6 Improving planning integration, application and knowledge 118 PART 7 References and further reading 119 PART 8 Appendices 131 PART 1 Introduction This part outlines what this report aims to achieve, and includes a regional description. 1.1 Purpose and scope Informing biodiversity conservation in the region In South Australia, the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges (AMLR) region is unique – relatively high rainfall, hilly topography and surrounded west and south by coastal environments. The diversity of landscapes within a comparatively small area supports a diverse array of ecosystems and species. Many species are endemic to the region or geographically separated from other State or interstate populations. The region is also home to over one million people residing in both urban and rural areas. The environmental health of the region is therefore important for both quality of life and economic prosperity. However, historic native vegetation clearance has been significant and only approximately 13% of original native vegetation remains in the region. Species have become extinct and many more are continuing to decline. Biodiversity conservation in the AMLR region aims to maintain, restore and halt the decline in ecological processes, vegetation communities and species. However, there is a limited amount of funding and resources available for biodiversity management, with an increasing level of accountability to ensure public funds are wisely spent. There is a need, therefore, to prioritise and ensure that works are targeted to meet specific and achievable outcomes. This report aims to inform existing regional biodiversity programs and funding bodies about conservation priorities, and proposes strategies and targets to achieve effective management of these priorities. It does this by assessing the current biodiversity status of the region (mainly through an analysis of vegetation decline) using current landscape planning principles, and by linking with other relevant regional planning processes. Conservation targets and actions are set at a variety of biological and spatial scales. There are high-level targets for managing landscapes as a whole, combined with targets for managing specific ecological communities, and targets related to conserving threatened species and other species that require conservation efforts. While many strategies and targets developed in this document are ambitious and require significant levels of additional resources to implement, others can be achieved with existing resources through improved information sharing, planning and regulatory processes. This report also provides a framework with which to develop conservation management priorities. However, it is acknowledged that ‘one document cannot do all’ and there are challenges ahead to develop a fully integrated planning framework which can drive relevant regional biodiversity management at a variety of biological and spatial scales (and which is relevant to State and National conservation goals). This document and the underlying analysis is intended to be dynamic, to change with new knowledge, new data and changing conditions. As mapping data is improved and new information becomes available from research and monitoring activities, strategies and targets should be modified. 1 Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region, South Australia Links to planning processes AMLR NRM Plan Outputs during the development of this report were used in formulating key biodiversity targets in the AMLR Natural Resource Management Board’s plan Creating a Sustainable Future – An Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region. The Department for Environment and Heritage (Adelaide Region) is currently implementing several NRM threatened species and vegetation management programs, the direction of which have been guided by this integrated planning approach. South Australia’s Strategic Plan and No Species Loss South Australia’s Strategic Plan (SASP) details a series of targets that provide a path towards a prosperous and better future for South Australia. The plan includes targets relating to increasing economic growth, including expansion of mineral exploration and production, and increasing the population of South Australia. There are also environmental targets, including a target to lose no known native species as a result of human impact. This target is addressed through No Species Loss – A Nature Conservation Strategy for South Australia 2007-2017, the implementation of which will be assisted by this report for the AMLR region. NatureLinks Another SASP target involves the development of five ‘NatureLinks’ biodiversity regions across the State. This report will help deliver the NatureLinks goal of integrated ecosystem management across the landscape. Regionally, the Cape Borda to Barossa NatureLink Strategy will facilitate the implementation of many priorities proposed in this report through assessing key challenges facing landscape scale conservation initiatives and progressing solutions to these challenges. Photo: © DEH Informing Biodiversity Conservation for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region, South Australia 2 The Plan for Greater Adelaide (2009-2038) This plan guides how the state government proposes to balance population and economic growth with the need to preserve the environment and protect the heritage, history and character of the greater Adelaide region. The policies in this plan will have an important influence on statutory planning processes in relation to increasing the consideration of biodiversity in development planning processes. The implementation of these policies will rely heavily on priority-setting information such as that contained within this report. Regional Recovery Pilot Project This report and the Regional Recovery Plan for Threatened Species and Ecological Communities of Adelaide and the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia were prepared concurrently and are closely integrated. Successful implementation of both species management requirements and habitat reconstruction targets are dependent on each other.Legislative context Legislative context The content in this report is guided by, and informs, legislation and policy. Appendix 1.1. lists core or primary relevance documents which drive or provide
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity
    Biodiversity KEY5 FACTS as hunting), as pasture grasses or as aquarium species Introduced (in the case of some marine species). They have also • Introduced species are been introduced accidentally, such as in shipments of recognised as a leading Species imported grain or in ballast water. cause of biodiversity loss Introduced plants, or weeds, can invade and world-wide. compete with native plant species for space, light, Trends water and nutrients and because of their rapid growth rates they can quickly smother native vegetation. • Rabbit numbers: a DECLINE since Similarly to weeds, many introduced animals compete introduction of Rabbit Haemorrhagic with and predate on native animals and impact on Disease (RHD, also known as calicivirus) native vegetation. They have high reproductive rates although the extent of the decline varies and can tolerate a wide range of habitats. As a result across the State. they often establish populations very quickly. •Fox numbers: DOWN in high priority Weeds can provide shelter for pest animals, conservation areas due to large-scale although they can provide food for or become habitat baiting programs; STILL A PROBLEM in for native animals. Blackberry, for example, is an ideal other parts of the State. habitat for the threatened Southern Brown Bandicoot. This illustrates the complexity of issues associated •Feral camel and deer numbers: UP. with pest control and highlights the need for control •Feral goat numbers: DECLINING across measures to have considered specific conservation Weed affected land – Mount Lofty Ranges the State. outcomes to be undertaken over time and to be Photo: Kym Nicolson •Feral pig numbers: UNKNOWN.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandrina Council Submission
    Ref: 18.89.001 File: GR:sm 26 July 2019 Regions SA Primary Industries and Regions SA GPO Box 167 ADELAIDE SA 500 Via email to: [email protected] Re: Regional Development Strategy Discussion Paper – Alexandrina Council Submission Alexandrina Council is one of the State’s largest regional Councils, as well as one of the State’s fastest growing communities. We believe a focus on regional development by all three levels of government is essential to both the wellbeing of our community, but also the prosperity of the State, and we welcome the renewed focus and energy being directed toward regional development by the Government of South Australia. The following table provides a snap shot of Alexandrina Council and what our district contributes to the Fleurieu region and the State of South Australia. ALEXANDRINA AT A GLANCE … Federal Electorate of Mayo State Electorates of Finniss, Heysen, Hammond and Mawson Home of ‘Storm Boy’ and the Coorong, Home of the SA Wooden Boat Festival at Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth the iconic Goolwa Wharf One of the largest regional Councils in SA Population of 27,000 residents at average with approximately $50 million annual growth rate of 1.3% (sea change and tree turnover change impacts) $1 billion local economy driven by Ageing region with a median age of 51 agriculture, tourism, health and social years (being 11 years above the State services average of 40 years). Strong social capital with 28% volunteerism High seasonal visitation to pristine natural rates attractions and appealing destinations Service Provision Whilst the core, essential service needs of any community are very similar no matter where they are located, the unique geography and demographics of a particular region will have significant implications for the optimal method and mechanisms of service delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 19 / 20
    Country SA PHN Annual Report 19/20 1 Annual Report 19 / 20 Contents Chair of the Board Report 2 Chief Executive Officer Report 3 Chair of Finance Report 6 Regional Health Priorities Statistics 8 Our Priority Areas 17 Reconciliation Action Plan 32 Local Health Clusters 36 2 Country SA PHN Annual Report 19/20 Chair of the Board Report The 2019-20 year has been anything Additional funding was also provided but routine, but the Country SA PHN to enable the establishment of (CSAPHN) has stepped up to the plate specific Respiratory Clinics and and been a strong voice for the role enhanced Respiratory focus in smaller of primary health care at the forefront clinics across our patch. Our senior of bushfire recovery and pandemics. staff are to be congratulated on our positioning in this arena with a much The Board took pause last year and stronger presence than seen in undertook an external review to see other states. what areas of good governance required more attention and has As well as the specific challenges made some changes to internal and thrown at us in the past year, CSAPHN Board processes in response to this. has continued with business as usual We expected to swing into 2020 in commissioning, monitoring and “As well as the with a new found vigour only to reviewing the range of services we specific challenges be pushed back by the devastation commission across all of rural SA. It of the bushfires across our regions is a credit to all our staff and service thrown at us in the hotly followed by the need to modify providers that we have managed to past year, CSAPHN our business processes due to the maintain this despite the difficulties precautions put in place around presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Hill Complex
    Broken Hill Complex Bioregion resources Photo Mulyangarie, DEH Broken Hill Complex The Broken Hill Complex bioregion is located in western New South Wales and eastern South Australia, spanning the NSW-SA border. It includes all of the Barrier Ranges and covers a huge area of nearly 5.7 million hectares with approximately 33% falling in South Australia! It has an arid climate with dry hot summers and mild winters. The average rainfall is 222mm per year, with slightly more rainfall occurring in summer. The bioregion is rich with Aboriginal cultural history, with numerous archaeological sites of significance. Biodiversity and habitat The bioregion consists of low ranges, and gently rounded hills and depressions. The main vegetation types are chenopod and samphire shrublands; casuarina forests and woodlands and acacia shrublands. Threatened animal species include the Yellow-footed Rock- wallaby and Australian Bustard. Grazing, mining and wood collection for over 100 years has led to a decline in understory plant species and cover, affecting ground nesting birds and ground feeding insectivores. 2 | Broken Hill Complex Photo by Francisco Facelli Broken Hill Complex Threats Threats to the Broken Hill Complex bioregion and its dependent species include: For Further information • erosion and degradation caused by overgrazing by sheep, To get involved or for more information please cattle, goats, rabbits and macropods phone your nearest Natural Resources Centre or • competition and predation by feral animals such as rabbits, visit www.naturalresources.sa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF
    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
    [Show full text]
  • American River, Kangaroo Island
    TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES TECHNICAL REPORTS & GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT REPORT Appendices A to I & K to L Issued September 2016 CONTENTS A. Infrastructure & Services Report (BCA Engineers) B. Native V egetation Assessment (Botanical Enigmerase) C. Landscape Concept Plan (Botanical Enigmerase) D. Fauna Assessment (Envisage Environmental) E. Archeological and Heritage Assessment (K. Walshe) N.B. This report is to be updated - it contains incorrect information regarding location of Plaque & Anchor F. Design Review 1 Letter (ODASA) G. Noise Assessment (Sonos) H. Stormwater Management (fmg Engineers) I. DR Guidelines (Development Assessment Commission) K. Draft CEMMP & OEMMP (PARTI) L. Traffic Impact Assessment ( infraPlan) - - - - - NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPOSED KANGAROO ISLAND RESORT AMERICAN RIVER CITY AND CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT (CCD) HOTEL AND RESORTS LLC 31 AUGUST 2016 BOTANICAL ENIGMERASE Michelle Haby- 0407 619 229 PO Box 639 Daniel Rowley- 0467 319 925 Kingscote SA 5223 ABN- 59 766 096 918 [email protected] NATIVE VEGETATION CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 31 August 2016 Citation: Haby, M and Rowley, D.J. (2016) Native Vegetation Assessment and Landscape Plan- Proposed American River Resort. Internal report to City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC. This report was researched and prepared by Botanical Enigmerase Email: [email protected] in accordance with the agreement between, on behalf of and for the exclusive use of City and Central Development (CCD) Hotel and Resorts LLC 2800 156th Avenue SE Suite 130 Bellevue, WA 98007 [email protected] Michelle Haby is a Native Vegetation Council accredited consultant, accredited to prepare data reports for clearance consent under Section 28 of the Native Vegetation Act 1991 and applications made under one of the Native Vegetation Regulations 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Lgfa
    2 013 ANNUAL REPORT LGFA Your Local Government Finance Authority of South Australia Member Councils as at June 30 2013 Adelaide City Council District Council of Karoonda East Murray City of Port Lincoln Adelaide Hills Council District Council of Kimba Port Pirie Regional Council Alexandrina Council Kingston District Council City of Prospect The Barossa Council Light Regional Council Renmark Paringa Council District Council of Barunga West District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula District Council of Robe Berri Barmera Council District Council of Loxton Waikerie Municipal Council of Roxby Downs City of Burnside District Council of Mallala City of Salisbury Campbelltown City Council Corporation of the City of Marion Southern Mallee District Council District Council of Ceduna Mid Murray Council District Council of Streaky Bay City of Charles Sturt City of Mitcham Tatiara District Council Clare and Gilbert Valleys Council District Council of Mount Barker City of Tea Tree Gully District Council of Cleve City of Mount Gambier District Council of Tumby Bay District Council of Coober Pedy District Council of Mount Remarkable Corporation of the City of Unley Coorong District Council Rural City of Murray Bridge City of Victor Harbor District Council of Copper Coast Naracoorte Lucindale Council Wakefield Regional Council District Council of Elliston Northern Areas Council Corporation of the Town of Walkerville The Flinders Ranges Council City of Norwood, Payneham and St. Peters Wattle Range Council District Council of Franklin Harbour City of Onkaparinga
    [Show full text]
  • Living Smart Review 2019
    Living2018 Smart -2019 HighlightsSA Courses that inspire, connect and build individual and community agency for lasting behaviour change. Inspiring action Building personal agency 90% of after-course survey respondents said As a result of Living Smart Living Smart helped them to be condent that 100% of course participants took they have the ability to care for the actions to care for the environment. environment. 96% now understand that their actions can positively impact the environment. 80% reduced household waste 99% built their knowledge and/or skills on 59% reduced water use how to care for the environment. 97% developed new habits/or routines to care increased community links 65% for the environment. 62% reduced energy use Growing connections with nature and others 52% reduced car use 90% appreciate nature and see it as something Top 3 actions started immediately to be protected. 80% feel connected and part of nature. #1 #2 #3 buying less packaging cutting energy growing food & soft plastics & water bills Top 3 actions in planning Participants valued making connections especially learning and sharing with # knowledge and skills with others. 1 Installing solar panels #2 Gardening for biodiversity #3 Connecting with local groups and community Reaching beyond participants Participants informed 1430+ people from their networks about Living Smart. Kick-starting ongoing action Participants are working together to inuence others. Since the inception of Living Smart in SA a number of groups and projects have emerged, including: > Burnside’s
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Riverland Regional Assessment Panel Meeting AGENDA 21 March
    Riverland Regional Assessment Panel meeting AGENDA 21 March 2019 at 1-30pm. BERRI BARMERA COUNCIL DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LOXTON WAIKERIE RENMARK PARINGA COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Riverland Regional Assessment Panel will be held in the District Council of Loxton Waikerie Council Chamber, 29 East Terrace, Loxton, on Thursday 21 March 2019, commencing at 1.30pm. CHERYLE PEDLER ASSESSMENT MANGER 13 March 2019 Page deliberately left blank THE BERRI BARMERA COUNCIL, DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LOXTON WAIKERIE, RENMARK PARINGA COUNCIL AGENDA FOR A MEETING OF THE RIVERLAND REGIONAL ASSESSMENT PANEL TO BE HELD THURSDAY MARCH 21 2019 AT 1.30 PM AT THE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LOXTON WAIKERIE COUNCIL CHAMBER, 29 EAST TERRACE, LOXTON. Members: Independent Presiding Member Mr B.G. Ballantyne Independent Members Messrs G.D. Parsons, J.B. McVicar, Ms J Lewis Elected Member Mr T Norton Staff Berri Barmera Council Mr D. Grieve (Senior Development Officer – Planning) District Council of Loxton Waikerie Mr J. Hunt (Development Officer – Planning) Renmark Paringa Council Mr R. Semrau (Principal Planner) Assessment Manager Mrs C.G. Pedler ITEM 1 WELCOME: ITEM 2 PRESENT: ITEM 3 APOLOGIES: ITEM 4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held February 21 2019 are attached at appendix for members information and adoption. RECOMMENDATION: That the minutes of the meeting held February 21 2019 be taken as read and confirmed. ITEM 5 BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE PREVIOUS MINUTES ITEM 6 DECLARATION OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS OF PANEL: ITEM 7 HEARING OF REPRESENTATIONS: ITEM 8 REPORTS: Item 8.1 Development Application 752/117/16 – Mr R Nobile Ms D Hooper ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To View More Samplers Click Here
    This sampler file contains various sample pages from the product. Sample pages will often include: the title page, an index, and other pages of interest. This sample is fully searchable (read Search Tips) but is not FASTFIND enabled. To view more samplers click here www.gould.com.au www.archivecdbooks.com.au · The widest range of Australian, English, · Over 1600 rare Australian and New Zealand Irish, Scottish and European resources books on fully searchable CD-ROM · 11000 products to help with your research · Over 3000 worldwide · A complete range of Genealogy software · Including: Government and Police 5000 data CDs from numerous countries gazettes, Electoral Rolls, Post Office and Specialist Directories, War records, Regional Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter histories etc. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK www.unlockthepast.com.au · Promoting History, Genealogy and Heritage in Australia and New Zealand · A major events resource · regional and major roadshows, seminars, conferences, expos · A major go-to site for resources www.familyphotobook.com.au · free information and content, www.worldvitalrecords.com.au newsletters and blogs, speaker · Free software download to create biographies, topic details · 50 million Australasian records professional looking personal photo books, · Includes a team of expert speakers, writers, · 1 billion records world wide calendars and more organisations and commercial partners · low subscriptions · FREE content daily and some permanently South Australian Government Gazette 1860 Ref. AU5100-1860 ISBN: 978 1 921416 95 8 This book was kindly loaned to Archive CD Books Australia by Flinders University www.lib.flinders.edu.au Navigating this CD To view the contents of this CD use the bookmarks and Adobe Reader’s forward and back buttons to browse through the pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Publishing SA So As to Be Received No Later Than 4 P.M
    No. 114 3843 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2002 CONTENTS Page Appointments, Resignations, Etc............................................. 3846 Building Work Contractors Act 1995—Notices...................... 3846 Corporations and District Councils—Notices ......................... 3877 Country Fires Act 1989—Notice............................................. 3846 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notice............................................. 3847 Development Act 1993—Notice ............................................. 3847 Electoral Act 1985—Notice.................................................... 3848 Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Act 1994— Notice .................................................................................. 3848 Liquor Licensing Act 1997—Notices...................................... 3848 National Parks Regulations 2001—Notices ............................ 3850 Private Advertisements............................................................ 3880 Proclamations.......................................................................... 3844 Proof of Sunrise and Sunset Act 1923—Almanac................... 3854 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................. 3880 REGULATIONS Fisheries Act 1982 (No. 193 of 2002) ................................. 3871 Development Act 1993 (No. 194 of 2002) .......................... 3872 Fees Regulation Act
    [Show full text]