DOCSLIB.ORG

CFA EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 7/8, 1998 Index to Minutes Secretary's Note: This Index Is Provided Only As a Courtesy To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CFA EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 7/8, 1998 Index to Minutes Secretary’s note: This index is provided only as a courtesy to the readers and is not an official part of the CFA minutes. The numbers shown for each item in the index are keyed to similar numbers shown in the body of the minutes. (1) MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING. ......................................................................................................... 2 (2) BREEDS & STANDARDS. ...................................................................................................................... 2 (3) JUDGING PROGRAM REPORTS: .................................................................................................... 107 (4) ADVANCEMENTS, APPLICANTS AND TRAINEES: ................................................................ 115 (5) TREASURER’S REPORT: .................................................................................................................. 117 (6) CLUB MEMBERSHIP APPLICATIONS (DOMESTIC): ............................................................. 126 (7) INTERNATIONAL DIVISION REPORT. ....................................................................................... 129 (8) WINN FOUNDATION REPORT. ..................................................................................................... 131 (9) HEALTH COMMITTEE REPORT. .................................................................................................. 131 (10) PUBLIC RELATIONS REPORT........................................................................................................ 133 (11) CFA INTERNATIONAL SHOW REPORT. .................................................................................... 138 (12) CLERKING PROGRAM....................................................................................................................... 144 (13) ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT. ............................................................................. 145 (14) CFA LOGO. ............................................................................................................................................. 147 (15) CFA LEGISLATIVE REPORT. .......................................................................................................... 147 (16) CFA PLANNING COMMITTEE. ....................................................................................................... 148 (17) CENTRAL OFFICE OPERATIONS REPORT................................................................................ 150 (18) YEARBOOK REPORT. ........................................................................................................................ 153 (19) JUDGING PROGRAM PROPOSAL. ................................................................................................. 154 (20) REGIONAL BOUNDARIES COMMITTEE. ................................................................................... 160 (21) MISCELLANEOUS. .............................................................................................................................. 160 (22) DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS & PROTESTS. ................................................................................. 171 CFA Board and Staff Present February 7-8, 1998 Mrs. Laina Aitken, NAR Director Mr. Stan Barnaby, Director-at-Large Mrs. Linda Berg, MWR Director Ms. Pam DelaBar, Director-at-Large Mrs. Diana Doernberg, Director-at-Large Mrs. Kim Everett, Vice President Mrs. Donna Fuller, Treasurer Mrs. Jody Garrison, GSR Director Mrs. Willa Hawke, Secretary Mrs. Becky Jones, GLR Director Mr. Phil Lindsley, SWR Director Ms. Joan Miller, Director-at-Large Mr. Craig Rothermel, President Mrs. Yaeko Takano, Japan Regional Director Ms. Donna J. Thompson, Director-at-Large Mr. Wayne Trevathan, SOR Director Mrs. Betty White, Director-at-Large Mr. Donald J. Williams, Director-at-Large Also present were Mr. Tom Dent, CFA Executive Director; Mr. Fred Jacobberger, CFA Legal Counsel; Ms. Allene Tartaglia, Director of Special Projects, Mr. Michael Brim, Public Relations Director. Absent was Mr. Dick Kallmeyer, NWR Director. The Board of Directors of the Cat Fanciers’ Association met at the Marriott Airport Hotel, Houston, Texas, on February 7-8, 1998. President Craig Rothermel called the meeting to order on February 7, 1998 at 8:00 a.m. and welcomed the Board members, the CFA staff, and the many guests to the meeting. (1) MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING. President Rothermel then invited the Board’s attention to consideration of the Minutes of the October 1997 Board meeting and asked for any corrections, deletions, or additions. Willa Hawke, CFA Secretary, noted none had been received. There being no other comment on the Minutes, DelaBar Moved to accept the minutes. Motion Carried. (2) BREEDS & STANDARDS. a. Breed Definition Report – Doernberg Moved to consider the Breed Definition Report before addressing the breeds up for consideration at this meeting. Discussion: Doernberg commented that “Fred Jacobberger felt that because the ballots to be considered today obviously were voted on before this issue comes up that it could not be used to act upon those ballots. There was a question on whether we should be voting on it prior to acting on those ballots. Fred would decide whether there was an issue that pertained to this and so advise us that we don’t have to take this as a rule at this meeting because it was not in place. However, if we do decide to take action on it or consider it at this time, I don’t see that 2 there is a conflict.” Jacobberger said that if he understood, he agreed, however, his issue was one of fundamental fairness where people had taken some actions based on the rules that they currently followed. If we can weigh that problem issue by issue, we can go ahead and take a vote. Lindsley – Just as a matter of procedure, when I got my packet it appeared to be informational and I had not considered it to be an action item. Hawke – If we vote to adopt this report when will it go into effect? Would it be May 1, or would it be today? Doernberg – It would go into effect at the end of this meeting. Lindsley – I have told any constituent of mine, that asked about the process of WIAB, that at least my understanding was that at this meeting we would be receiving the poll results not that this would become an action item. I told anybody that asked that I did not envision it being an action item until June. I don’t think people understand that it is to become an action item at this meeting. Doernberg – A comment to Phil’s comment. We consider all our ballot items for all the rest of our ballot questions at this meeting. This is our traditional meeting for consideration of Breeds and Standards matters and this has been an ongoing process. I think if people got a ballot, they got the proposal. This is not the first time that this has come before them and I don’t know why anyone would think that it was to be forever ongoing. It was noted in the last minutes that the committee had met; they had made this final determination. What was left for them? Aitken disagreed with Phil and stated that the people had received this with their BC ballots and they felt that this would be the defining point roundup of WIAB at this board meeting. Thompson – This is as much of an action item as the rest of the BC questions. It was distributed to the BC members and was acted upon as well as the BC questions. Everett – How close the vote was should be taken into consideration. If it was not close enough the matter should go back to the BC secretaries for conference, perhaps at the annual meeting. Lindsley – It may be that many people who got this with their BC ballots thought that we would be acting on it at this meeting but, as board members, when we receive our BC packet we know that we will be acting on that in February at this meeting. I still don’t feel that it was clear to the board that we would be voting on this at this meeting. Hawke (reading from the minutes of the October meeting, found on page 76 of Dec 1997 Almanac) – “Moved to send the report to each BC member for input and then bring it back to the board for further discussion in February. Motion Carried.” Motion to Consider Carried. Lindsley and Everett voting No. Doernberg gave the following for the benefit of those newer board members not completely familiar with what had happened with this issue; i.e., to lend a little continuity as to how this came about, where we have been, and why we are at this point. “In February of 1996, the board once again came face to face with the largest problem CFA faces in the Breeds & Standards area: The conflict between parent breeds and their related hybrid breeds. At that time we had a lengthy discussion about the Persian Exotics and Tom Dent and myself, were asked to head up a committee to develop the criteria to define a breed in CFA. The discussion took up about two-and-a-half pages where the board discussed how many times we had been put in this position and how that particular issue came to be so critical and now we were at a cross roads and what we were going to do about it. That is why the committee was formed. Subsequent to that meeting, a committee comprised of Wayne Harding, Michael Petersen, Anna Sadler, with Tom Dent and myself, put together a substantial amount of information concerning this subject along with Leslie Lyons of the National Cancer Institute. We met in the Central Office. Out of that meeting came “A report which attempted to define the basis for our need for a breed definition
Recommended publications
  • Federal Communications Commission Before the Federal

    Federal Communications Commission Before the Federal

    Federal Communications Commission Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Existing Shareholders of Clear Channel ) BTCCT-20061212AVR Communications, Inc. ) BTCH-20061212CCF, et al. (Transferors) ) BTCH-20061212BYE, et al. and ) BTCH-20061212BZT, et al. Shareholders of Thomas H. Lee ) BTC-20061212BXW, et al. Equity Fund VI, L.P., ) BTCTVL-20061212CDD Bain Capital (CC) IX, L.P., ) BTCH-20061212AET, et al. and BT Triple Crown Capital ) BTC-20061212BNM, et al. Holdings III, Inc. ) BTCH-20061212CDE, et al. (Transferees) ) BTCCT-20061212CEI, et al. ) BTCCT-20061212CEO For Consent to Transfers of Control of ) BTCH-20061212AVS, et al. ) BTCCT-20061212BFW, et al. Ackerley Broadcasting – Fresno, LLC ) BTC-20061212CEP, et al. Ackerley Broadcasting Operations, LLC; ) BTCH-20061212CFF, et al. AMFM Broadcasting Licenses, LLC; ) BTCH-20070619AKF AMFM Radio Licenses, LLC; ) AMFM Texas Licenses Limited Partnership; ) Bel Meade Broadcasting Company, Inc. ) Capstar TX Limited Partnership; ) CC Licenses, LLC; CCB Texas Licenses, L.P.; ) Central NY News, Inc.; Citicasters Co.; ) Citicasters Licenses, L.P.; Clear Channel ) Broadcasting Licenses, Inc.; ) Jacor Broadcasting Corporation; and Jacor ) Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc. ) ) and ) ) Existing Shareholders of Clear Channel ) BAL-20070619ABU, et al. Communications, Inc. (Assignors) ) BALH-20070619AKA, et al. and ) BALH-20070619AEY, et al. Aloha Station Trust, LLC, as Trustee ) BAL-20070619AHH, et al. (Assignee) ) BALH-20070619ACB, et al. ) BALH-20070619AIT, et al. For Consent to Assignment of Licenses of ) BALH-20070627ACN ) BALH-20070627ACO, et al. Jacor Broadcasting Corporation; ) BAL-20070906ADP CC Licenses, LLC; AMFM Radio ) BALH-20070906ADQ Licenses, LLC; Citicasters Licenses, LP; ) Capstar TX Limited Partnership; and ) Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc. ) Federal Communications Commission ERRATUM Released: January 30, 2008 By the Media Bureau: On January 24, 2008, the Commission released a Memorandum Opinion and Order(MO&O),FCC 08-3, in the above-captioned proceeding.
  • Objectivity, Interdisciplinary Methodology, and Shared Authority

    Objectivity, Interdisciplinary Methodology, and Shared Authority

    ABSTRACT HISTORY TATE. RACHANICE CANDY PATRICE B.A. EMORY UNIVERSITY, 1987 M.P.A. GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 1990 M.A. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- MILWAUKEE, 1995 “OUR ART ITSELF WAS OUR ACTIVISM”: ATLANTA’S NEIGHBORHOOD ARTS CENTER, 1975-1990 Committee Chair: Richard Allen Morton. Ph.D. Dissertation dated May 2012 This cultural history study examined Atlanta’s Neighborhood Arts Center (NAC), which existed from 1975 to 1990, as an example of black cultural politics in the South. As a Black Arts Movement (BAM) institution, this regional expression has been missing from academic discussions of the period. The study investigated the multidisciplinary programming that was created to fulfill its motto of “Art for People’s Sake.” The five themes developed from the program research included: 1) the NAC represented the juxtaposition between the individual and the community, local and national; 2) the NAC reached out and extended the arts to the masses, rather than just focusing on the black middle class and white supporters; 3) the NAC was distinctive in space and location; 4) the NAC seemed to provide more opportunities for women artists than traditional BAM organizations; and 5) the NAC had a specific mission to elevate the social and political consciousness of black people. In addition to placing the Neighborhood Arts Center among the regional branches of the BAM family tree, using the programmatic findings, this research analyzed three themes found to be present in the black cultural politics of Atlanta which made for the center’s unique grassroots contributions to the movement. The themes centered on a history of politics, racial issues, and class dynamics.
  • Second Wave Rail-To-Trail Initiatives and Ecological Gentrification: Lessons from New York City's High Line and Atlanta's Be

    Second Wave Rail-To-Trail Initiatives and Ecological Gentrification: Lessons from New York City's High Line and Atlanta's Be

    Undergraduate Journal of Humanistic Studies • Winter 2016 • Vol. 2 Second Wave Rail-to-Trail Initiatives and Ecological Gentrification: Lessons from New York City’s High Line and Atlanta’s Beltline Aaron Suiter Carleton College January 17, 2016 rbanites generally agree that city parks are urban oases. In addition to their aesthetic and Ucultural value, city parks can improve the wellbeing of those living proximate to them by making them more active, less obese, and happier.1 However, not all city-dwellers benefit equally from parks. Historically, green space has benefitted elites at the expense of the urban poor. New York’s Central Park—perhaps America’s most famous and beloved park—was explicitly designed to increase land values and encourage development, and required the destruction of the marginalized Irish and black neighborhood Senecca Village.2 Yet although Central Park was planned with development in mind, its primary purpose was to serve a moral mission: “to facilitate activities that provided exercise, instruction, and psychic restoration.”3 In fact, the architects of Central Park were disturbed by the fact that urban archi- tecture and commercial life could be seen from within the park; the park was intended to be respite from the city, not a part of it.4 As Galen Cranz summarizes, “the notion of a park was endorsed as if it were a check on the encroachment of the city rather than a feature of the city itself.”5 In the years since Central Park was built, planners and landscape architects have continued building parks with moral agendas such as simple class uplift, temperance, and quelling potential class unrest.6 In addition, green space has long served public health and environmental agendas, including filtering air, lowering ambient noise, cooling hot concrete cities, absorbing storm water, and providing places for exercise.7 Although early American parks were seen as checks on the encroachment of the city, I argue that parks are now very much part of the encroachment of the city rather than a check on it.
  • Georgia State 41, Shorter 7

    Georgia State 41, Shorter 7

    2019 GSU FB Covers.indd 1 6/28/19 10:44 AM 2019 GSU FB Covers.indd 2 6/28/19 10:44 AM 2019 SCHEDULE Date Opponent .......................................................................................Time Aug. 31 at Tennessee .............................................................. ESPNU ...... 3:30 p.m. Sept. 7 FURMAN ............................................................ ESPN3 ...........7 p.m. Sept. 14 at Western Michigan ................................................ ESPN+ ............. 7 p.m. Sept. 21 at Texas State ............................................................................................. TBA Oct. 5 ARKANSAS STATE (Homecoming) ........................................... TBA Oct. 12 at Coastal Carolina ................................................................................... TBA Oct. 19 ARMY ............................................................................................... TBA Oct. 26 TROY ................................................................................................ TBA Nov. 9 at ULM ........................................................................................................... TBA Nov. 16 APPALACHIAN STATE.................................................................. TBA Nov. 23 SOUTH ALABAMA ......................................................................... TBA Nov. 30 at Georgia Southern ................................................................................. TBA 2019 GEORGIA STATE FOOTBALL #OurCity MEDIAINFORMATION GEORGIA
  • Powertool Drag Race

    Powertool Drag Race

    2011 Agricultural Technology Contest University of Wisconsin - River Falls Small Animals Contest Description and Rules: Please direct questions to: Candis O'Brien ([email protected] ) or Brigid Reimann ([email protected] ) Student Co-chairs This contest is designed to assess student knowledge, application, analytical and evaluation abilities, in the area of small animal care, veterinary skills, and per store management. Four students per team will be allowed to compete in the contest. Each member of the team will complete the contest individually. The top two scores on the team will constitute a team score. The contest will cover the following types of animals. Dogs Cats Birds Fish A. Written Test Twenty-five multiple choice questions worth 2 points per question. Overall Topics include: Anatomy and Physiology Nutrition Diseases and Parasites Breeding and Genetics Breeds and Grooming Housing and Management LISTING OF TOPIC AREAS FOR WRITTEN EXAM A. ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY a. Skeletal i. Avian ii. Mammalian iii. Fish b. Muscles i. Major types and locations ii. Physiology and functions c. Digestion i. Parts and how they function ii. Comparison between species d. Skin i. Glands Page 1 of 10 http://www.uwrf.edu/AGED/AgriculturalTechnologyContest.cfm 2011 Agricultural Technology Contest University of Wisconsin - River Falls ii. Layers/Attachments iii. Hair/Claws e. Reproduction i. Parts and how they function ii. Comparisons of male and female iii. Comparisons between species iv. Gestation, Parturition, Litter size, Estrus Cycles f. Nervous System i. Components and how they work ii. Sense organs - How they work (eyes, nose, mouth, ears) iii. Comparison between species g.
  • Afro-Caribbeans and the New Great Migration to Atlanta

    Afro-Caribbeans and the New Great Migration to Atlanta

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2015 On the Midnight Train to Georgia: Afro-Caribbeans and the New Great Migration to Atlanta LaToya Asantelle Tavernier Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/630 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] ON THE MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGIA: AFRO-CARIBBEANS AND THE NEW GREAT MIGRATION TO ATLANTA by LATOYA A. TAVERNIER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York. 2015 © 2015 LATOYA A. TAVERNIER All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Vilna Bashi Treitler Date Chair of Examining Committee Professor Philip Kasinitz Date Executive Officer Prof. Philip Kasinitz Prof. Nancy Foner Prof. Charles Green Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract ON THE MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGIA: AFRO-CARIBBEANS AND THE NEW GREAT MIGRATION TO ATLANTA by LaToya A. Tavernier Advisor: Vilna Bashi Treitler In the 21 st century, Atlanta, Georgia has become a major new immigrant destination. This study focuses on the migration of Afro-Caribbeans to Atlanta and uses data collected from in-depth interviews, ethnography, and the US Census to understand: 1) the factors that have contributed to the emergence of Atlanta as a new destination for Afro-Caribbean immigrants and 2) the ways in which Atlanta’s large African American population, and its growing immigrant population, shape the incorporation of Afro-Caribbeans, as black immigrants, into the southern city.
  • Show Rules12 13

    Show Rules12 13

    $7.00 SHOWSHOW RULES MAY 1, 2020 – APRIL 30, 2021 MAY 1, 1998 – APRIL 30, 1999 THE CAT FANCIERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC.® Grand Points Downloadable Available Online Show Entry Forms Check grand points at hol.cfa.org/herman.asp. The CFA Show Entry Form is available to down- National/Divisional/Regional points from past show load from CFA’s web site at the following address: seasons are also available using this feature. Be sure https://cfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/entry-form.pdf to have your cat’s registration number available in Other CFA forms are also available including the either case. Grand points from the previous weekend Championship/Premiership Clam Form, Companion will be posted as soon as possible. Cat Registration form, and the Litter Registration Application Form. Show Records Data File Information The “CFA Data File” must be provided to the CFA judge’s books (color class sheets). Once the entries Central Office as a file emailed directly to Central have been sorted and the first print file is created DO Office by the show entry clerk. This file, which is NOT MAKE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORREC- used by the Central Office during the scoring of the TIONS TO THE DATA FILE. Making an addition or show, will be a specified format of the cat and correcting a birth date, title or color of a cat may exhibitor database (it does not include any of the cause a resort and the new file will not be in the same financial files for the show). For Central Office to order as the original file that was created.
  • The Base Colors: Black and Chestnut the Tail, Called “Foal Fringes.”The Lower Legs Can Be So Pale That It Is Let’S Begin with the Base Colors

    The Base Colors: Black and Chestnut the Tail, Called “Foal Fringes.”The Lower Legs Can Be So Pale That It Is Let’S Begin with the Base Colors

    Foal Color 4.08 3/20/08 2:18 PM Page 44 he safe arrival of a newborn foal is cause for celebration. months the sun bleaches the foal’s birth coat, altering its appear- After checking to make sure all is well with the mare and ance even more. Other environmental issues, such as type and her new addition, the questions start to fly. What gender quality of feed, also can have a profound effect on color. And as we is it? Which traits did the foal get from each parent? And shall see, some colors do change drastically in appearance with Twhat color is it, anyway? Many times this question is not easily age, such as gray and the roany type of sabino. Finally, when the answered unless the breeder has seen many foals, of many colors, foal shed occurs, the new color coming in often looks dramatical- throughout many foaling seasons. In the landmark 1939 movie, ly dark. Is it any wonder that so many foals are registered an incor- “The Wizard of Oz,” MGM used gelatin to dye the “Horse of a rect—and sometimes genetically impossible—color each year? Different Color,” but Mother Nature does a darn good job of cre- So how do you identify your foal’s color? First, let’s keep some ating the same spectacular special effects on her foals! basic rules of genetics in mind. Two chestnuts will only produce The foal’s color from birth to the foal shed (which generally chestnut; horses of the cream, dun, and silver dilutions must have occurs between three and four months of age) can change due to had at least one parent with that particular dilution themselves; many factors, prompting some breeders to describe their foal as and grays must always have one gray parent.
  • Registration Rules

    Registration Rules

    The Cat Fanciers’ Association, Inc. World’s Largest Registry of Pedigreed Cats 1805 Atlantic Avenue, PO Box 1005 • Manasquan, New Jersey 08736-0805 Phone: 732-528-9797 • Fax: 732-528-7391 • www.cfa.org Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (eastern time) Rules for Registratio n© (Effective August 1, 2010) A vertical line next to a section indicates a change/addition. A double vertical line denotes a deletion. The following are basic general rules for registration. For more detailed National/Regional Point Info (per cat) ................................................................ $15.00 instructions regarding each service, please refer to the information printed Show Rules (includes S&H) ..................................................................................... $7.00 on each application and certificate. Please call the Central Office at the Show Standards (includes S&H) ............................Complete Set/Booklet $9.00 phone number above with specific questions and/or areas not covered in Single Breed Free these rules. Clerking Manual (includes S&H) ............................................................................ $4.00 Forms for Litter Registration .......................................................................... No charge ARTICLE I - FEES Returned Check Service Charge .......................................................................... $20.00 Section 1 - Fees ON-LINE ALMANAC (12 months) .......................................................................... $49.00 Cat/Kitten Registration at time
  • Arabian Coat Color Patterns

    Arabian Coat Color Patterns

    Arabian Coat Color Patterns Copyright 2011 Brenda Wahler In the Arabian breed, there are three unusual coat colors or patterns that occur in some purebred horses. The first is sabino, the only white spotting pattern seen in purebred Arabians, characterized by bold white face and leg markings, and, in some cases, body spotting. The second pattern is rabicano, a roan-like intermixture of white and dark hairs. Both sabino and rabicano horses are often registered by their base coat color, with white patterns noted as markings, but some extensively marked individuals have been registered as “roan,” even though true roan is a separate coat color. The third unusual coat color is dominant white, a mutation characterized by a predominantly white hair coat and pink skin, present at birth. All Arabians in the United States currently known to be dominant white trace to a single stallion, foaled in 1996, verified to be the offspring of his registered Arabian parents, both of whom were solid-colored. It is difficult to know how many Arabians have these unusual colors as they are often not searchable in registration records. For many years, Arabians with dominant white, body spots, or simply “too much white” were discouraged from registration, and white body markings were penalized in halter classes. The exclusion of boldly-marked “cropout” horses was also common in other registries, leading to the formation of a number of color breed associations. However, when parentage verification became possible, horses born with “too much” white could be confirmed as the offspring of their stated parents, and breed registries generally relaxed their rules or policies that previously excluded such animals.
  • Color Coat Genetics

    Color Coat Genetics

    Color CAMERoatICAN ≤UARTER Genet HORSE ics Sorrel Chestnut Bay Brown Black Palomino Buckskin Cremello Perlino Red Dun Dun Grullo Red Roan Bay Roan Blue Roan Gray SORREL WHAT ARE THE COLOR GENETICS OF A SORREL? Like CHESTNUT, a SORREL carries TWO copies of the RED gene only (or rather, non-BLACK) meaning it allows for the color RED only. SORREL possesses no other color genes, including BLACK, regardless of parentage. It is completely recessive to all other coat colors. When breeding with a SORREL, any color other than SORREL will come exclusively from the other parent. A SORREL or CHESTNUT bred to a SORREL or CHESTNUT will yield SORREL or CHESTNUT 100 percent of the time. SORREL and CHESTNUT are the most common colors in American Quarter Horses. WHAT DOES A SORREL LOOK LIKE? The most common appearance of SORREL is a red body with a red mane and tail with no black points. But the SORREL can have variations of both body color and mane and tail color, both areas having a base of red. The mature body may be a bright red, deep red, or a darker red appearing almost as CHESTNUT, and any variation in between. The mane and tail are usually the same color as the body but may be blonde or flaxen. In fact, a light SORREL with a blonde or flaxen mane and tail may closely resemble (and is often confused with) a PALOMINO, and if a dorsal stripe is present (which a SORREL may have), it may be confused with a RED DUN.
  • Balinese Cat

    Balinese Cat

    Balinese cat The Balinese is a long-haired breed of domestic cat with Siamese-style point coloration and sapphire-blue eyes. The Balinese is also known as the purebred long-haired Siamese, since it originated as a natural mutation of that breed, and hence is essentially the same cat with a medium-length silky coat and a distinctively plumed tail. As is the case with their short-haired counterparts, a genetic distinction is made between traditional or "old-style" and modern body types. In the American standard, colour variants derived from the Colourpoint Shorthair are further considered a separate breed, known as the Javanese. There is no particular connection between these cats and the Indonesian islands of Bali and Java, from which they derive their names. Like their Siamese ancestors, Balinese are sociable, vocal, playful and inquisitive, and considered among the most intelligent of all long-haired breeds. History and development: Sylvia Holland, pioneer Balinese breeder The "Balinese" is not actually from Bali or any part of Indonesia. Its history begins with the first Siamese cats that were imported from Thailand to the US and UK in the mid-1800s, some of whom carried the recessive long-haired gene. The Balinese breed subsequently originated from deliberate breeding efforts based around this naturally expressed genetic trait. Initially, occasional long-haired kittens in Siamese litters were considered a fault in the bloodlines and sold exclusively as pets. There are records of these cats as early as the 1920s; "Long-haired Siamese" were first registered as show cats with the American Cat Fanciers Federation (CFF) in 1928.