Evaluation As Construction of Knowledge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 392 838 TM 024 614 AUTHOR Kvale, Steinar TITLE Evaluation as Construction of Knowledge. PUB DATE Apr 95 NOTE 21p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Constructivism (Learning); Cross Cultural Studies; Culture; *Evaluation Methods; Foreign Countries; Intellectual Disciplines; *Knowledge Level; Metacognition; *Student Evaluation; *Test Use IDENTIFIERS Discourse; Knowledge Acquisition; *Metanarration; *Postmodernism ABSTRACT Evaluation is discussed as knowledge construction. Examinations are considered as tests of knowledge or as tests of students and then as selection tools or as the construction of knowledge in themselves. Examinations involve the power to define what is common knowledge in a discipline and in a culture, and the examination discourse contributes to the construction of this valid knowledge. The postmodern perspective on knowledge is characterized by a disbelief in the metanarratives of legitimation. Knowledge is not fixed, but constructed, and a postmodernist perspective leads to the interpretation of knowledge as social construction. Some of the knowledge tensions in a postmodern condition are applied to evaluation, focusing on the tension between universal commensurability and the narratives of local cultures in an era when universal metanarratives no longer appear as the foundations of valid knowledge. The future of evaluation may rest on research that crosses cultural and disciplinary boundaries. (Contains 2 figures and 31 references.) (SLD) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** American Educational Research Association - Annual Meeting Be conunensurable, or disappear (Lyotard) San Francisco, April 18 - 22, 1995 construction,testsstructionI will of here students of adress knowledge. and or outlineevaluation as tests Then how of asknowledge Ithe knowledgewill examination introduce of construction.exams a discoursepostmodern as selection First contributes perspective Iof shall students treatto theon versusthe knowledgeconstruction topic exams of exams asas of socialcon- the as EVALUATION AS CONSTRUCTIONUniversitySteinar ofKvale Aarhus OF KNOWLEDGE ditionnarrativesvalid knowledgewill ofbe local applied of cultures. a todiscipline. evaluation, Finally in particular some of athe tension tensions of universalof knowledge commensurability in a postmodern and con- the Introduction Denmark EDUCATIONAtOtkeU at S Educafional DEPARTMENTCE RESOURCES NTE Remorch R OF (ERIC) EDUCATION and INFORMATION unpasvetneal 1. A historical introduction 2.1. EvaluationA historical of introduction students or of knowledge? .14htsorvnal.ndtece.,,epteotoduCt.O.NfinOt dOCument changes troth .1 theduhte nave has oersOn Peenbeen Ot rnaderepast:laced 0,1311a.ZatIOn to Impcove se someoftenEvaluation aspectsnegatively is of a thenew laden, history term terms inof educationexaminationsas examinations and shall has and bein grades.lastbriefly decades mentioned.Before been turning replacing to current traditional, evaluation, and 3.33.23.13. EvaluationPostmodernExamination as construction thematicknowledgeas knowledge knowledge ofconstruction knowledge construction constitution and censorship OEPointsmeat R. 01dopos(ton View not ornetessealy or oponronS pohcy Stiltedrepresent tn thts otlia(al doct.e ofseventhThe Konfutse, prehistorycomprehensive century they of after examinationswere civil Christ. strictly examination The controlled,goes exams back system were to and thebased was only Han developed on adynasty fewessays of treatingineveryby China the hundredEmperor literature 200 years candidates T'ai-tsung and before the thought Christ. passedin the 4.24.14. DiscursiveDifferentiationEvaluation knowledge as ofstructural knowledge knowledge constitution MATERIALPERMISSION HAS TO BEEN REPRODUCE GRANTED THIS BY ablytitlewasthrough supervised"China'sprogressive the provincial Examination by at the the Emperor examinationstime. Hell" The himself. (Miyazaki, exams to the Whilewere equally 1976) in being principle - hard the strenous examinations final open metropolitan toa recentall qualifiedwere history fair,palace applicants. and thus exam, immeasur- bears which The the 4.64.54.44.3CastrationCommodificationKnowledgeFragmentation of as knowledge privilegeof ofknowledge knowledge emperor;passedmain113). function the T'ai-tsung final of palace the thusbureaucratic exam: remarked "The examination heros when of observing the empiresystem a are wasprocession all to in recruit my ofpocket!" loyal the candidates civil (Mizyaki, cervants who 1976, to had the p. 5.25. /LocalLossKnowledge of narratives legitimacy and evaluation in a postmodern condition I(j THEOHMA: F DU( o IN ATIONAL C.ENTEH Thethekeephereditary recruitment introduction the military aristocracy, of officersof loyal the and civilcivil subordinate the servantsservice legitimacy examinations throughto civil of rule.the examinationcivil It in is the cervantsthus seventh possible, bureaucracy recruited centruy as argued by servedbroke the by exams theto Mizyaki, keep rule sewed Chinaof that the to ReferencesConcluding5.45.3CommensurabilityCapitalization perspectives of knowledge Thenations.a united civil empireservice at examinations a period when became Europe too was rigid caught and they in continual were abolished feudal warsat the of turn provinces of thiscen- and Itthecriticaltury, is people;tradition desctructive with of examinationsexams: it ofis thelike and "The emys an should ambush, presentbecoming in eightbe prevented becauseexamination parts...The a continually the (quoted questions examinationsystem debated after appears are Ch'en, topic. unpredictable,system more1974, Thus fights suitablep. Mao 94). thespecial, Zse pupilsfor Dong enemies and like stillwas enemies. thanheld rather forin BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 t) wereIli Europe mainly examinations in the form wereof public introduced oral disputes, at the universities which could at bethe rather end of harsh the middle (see Kvale,1972). ages. They Thecandidatesexaminations.encethe universityfounder that the had of judgesexamsThe the to swearuniversityexams overwith before ofheaventhe the at Christian Paris, periodthe and examination Robert hellwere day were ofaggressive; de the Sorbon, by that last far theyjudgement. milder thusthus would atin that thethe Henever Universitythirteenththe found judges carry as centuryof atrevengethe Cambridgethe main universitycompared on differ- their the examiners.TheInforbidding the grades, modern theThe introduced studentsera examination the ritual toin carrythe oralrules European long examinations at theknives Universityschools at the were by examination. of thereplaced Heidelberg Jesuits by in the thefrom formal sixteenth 1501 bureauchratic contained century, abecame passage exams. a achievements,tionaldimensionalcentralcational privileges. mean hierarchy. gradingof with control The every scale grades and pupil makes selection. appear having possible objective Grades a formally a simple represent and equal legitimate,formal a chancebureaucratic selection they of getting are of stroke basedpupils to ofthe onfor genius, topthe further ofpupils thethe educa- one- edu-own lutiondoor.rathergrades,While After inthanit it China,is represents oftenfamilythe selection the popular position selectiona formal to among higherand throughlegal income, students educationsystem, exams political towith andthroughbash access grades correctness at thepolitical to were formalistic higher byand virtues manyeducation connections bureaucracy during students through the throughexperienced Cultural of own exams the merits, Revo- back andas a liberating2.also Evaluation Thoegersen, force, of as1990).students described or of by knowledge? Jung Chang in her autobiography "Three Swans" (1992; see evaluatedtionusedEvaluation of for students' determining on means the knowledge. basis according the of pricethe Thistoknowledge of the formulationa commodity.dictionary: they document,is, to In however, ascertain education, or ambiguous, theis evaluationit value the knowledge of is something; pertainsit the students presented to evaluation the whoevalua- by arethe is luationFigure 1.1of depictsA students figure-ground the and two as alternative understandingan evaluation ways ofof of knowledge.evaluation conceiving of Thethe student subjectfaces or depict matterof knowledge the of twoexams examinators- as an eva- of Thetheatstudents Scandianavian instutition,dual whichtopic ofandis evaluationevaluated?universities the other shallis where an beexternal discussedan essay examiner, ishere evaluated in often relation bycalled twoto a "censor", examiners.common whoform One comes of is examination a teacherfrom an- at Debatesandasan theexamination also knowledge andthe possibilityresearch committee, tested. on to examinationsThe abstract or figure the studentand emphasises focushave and generallyupon the the oneexaminer, interdependence focusedof the twoand upon -the students the vaseof studentsstudents inbetween or knowledge. evaluated.and mayknowledge, be I shallseen paper.timesother universityfollowed byor froman oral the examination local professional of, or acommunity. more open Thedialogue evaluation