DOCSLIB.ORG

Operational Concepts Definition Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operational Concepts Definition Document Gemini Planet Imager Operational Concept Definition Document V4.1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory National Research Council, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics National Science Foundation Center for Adaptive Optics University of California, Los Angeles Jet Propulsion Laboratory University of California, Santa Cruz American Museum of Natural History Université de Montréal University of California, Berkeley Gemini GPI Operational Concepts Definition Document Revision History Date Revisio Revised By Description Approval n No. June 30/04 0.0 Tessa Ford Draft template for discussion Oct 15/04 0.1 James Graham Initial Draft Feb 19/05 1.0 Bruce Macintosh Release version for ExAOC CoDR Bruce Macintosh 2007-05-08 2.0 James Graham PDR update. Leslie Saddlemyer Bruce Macintosh Updated observing sequences, added Bruce Macintosh polarimetry, Io monitoring, and minor planet companion survey. Updated FoV requirement. Moved background contamination, operating wavelength, spectral resolution, polarization, and system Mueller matrix to Appendices Updated instrument sections to reflect current design Updated science summary from current PDR Vol. 1, Ch. 1. Reformatting, final requirements update, PDR mask sizes 2008-4-25 2.1 James Graham Reviewed contrast requirements & updated references 2008-05-07 2.2 – 2.6 James Graham, Leslie Saddlemyer Bruce Macintosh, 2008-05-07 3.0 – 3.1 Leslie Saddlemyer Table of COR elements updated to Leslie Saddlemyer latest. 2008-05-08 3.2 Leslie Saddlemyer Fix Lyot table with blank Leslie Saddlemyer 2008-11-26 3.3 Bruce Macintosh Post-CDR updates: coronagraph table; 2008-12-12 4.0 Leslie Saddlemyer CCB approvals all received for V4.0, Leslie Saddlemyer ready for submission to Gemini 2009-04-27 4.1 Leslie Saddlemyer deltaCDR changes, mainly removal Leslie Saddlemyer of unnecessary TBDs Page 2 of 136 Gemini GPI Operational Concepts Definition Document Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 3 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 11 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1. TECHNICAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 13 5 SCIENTIFIC OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................... 15 5.2. ARCHITECTURE OF PLANETARY SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................ 15 5.3. PLANETARY ATMOSPHERES ..................................................................................................................................... 18 5.4. PLANETS IN OPEN CLUSTERS AND YOUNG ASSOCIATIONS ........................................................................................ 21 5.5. ADOLESCENT STARS ................................................................................................................................................ 22 5.6. SCATTERED LIGHT IMAGING OF DEBRIS DISKS ......................................................................................................... 23 5.7. ADJUNCT SCIENCE ................................................................................................................................................... 26 5.7.1. Solar System Exploration ................................................................................................................................... 26 5.8. STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS ......................................................................................................................................... 28 5.8.1. Stellar Binaries .................................................................................................................................................. 28 5.8.2. Multiplicity of O stars and high mass star formation ........................................................................................ 29 5.8.3. White dwarfs in binaries .................................................................................................................................... 29 5.8.4. Substellar companions ....................................................................................................................................... 30 5.8.5. Evolved Stars and mass loss .............................................................................................................................. 30 6 SCIENCE DRIVERS & REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................... 32 6.1. SURVEYS FOR DIRECT DETECTION OF PLANETS ........................................................................................................ 32 6.1.1. Field star survey ................................................................................................................................................ 32 6.1.2. Searches for exoplanets in young clusters and associations .............................................................................. 39 6.1.3. Confirmation and characterization of exoplanet candidates ............................................................................. 43 6.2. DEBRIS DISKS .......................................................................................................................................................... 45 6.3. ADJUNCT SCIENCE ................................................................................................................................................... 49 6.3.1. Solar System Exploration ................................................................................................................................... 49 7 SCIENTIFIC REQUIREMENT SUMMARY MATRIX ........................................................................................... 50 8 INSTRUMENT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... 51 8.1. BASIC PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................................................ 52 8.2. SUBSYSTEM OVERVIEW (FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBSYSTEMS) ................................................................... 53 8.2.1. Adaptive Optics system ...................................................................................................................................... 53 8.2.2. Coronagraph ...................................................................................................................................................... 54 8.2.3. Science camera .................................................................................................................................................. 55 2.1.1 Spectrograph Optics .......................................................................................................................................... 58 8.2.4. Dual Channel Polarimeter ................................................................................................................................. 59 8.2.5. Calibration system ............................................................................................................................................. 61 8.2.6. Calibration sources ............................................................................................................................................ 63 8.3. OPERATING MODES ................................................................................................................................................. 63 8.3.1. Instrument configuration ................................................................................................................................... 63 8.3.2. AO configuration ............................................................................................................................................... 64 8.3.3. Coronagraph configuration ............................................................................................................................... 64 8.3.4. Science camera configuration ............................................................................................................................ 66 8.3.5. Data Acquisition System .................................................................................................................................... 67 8.3.6. Science detector configuration ........................................................................................................................... 68 9 SETUP AND CONFIGURATION REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 68 9.1. DAYTIME CALIBRATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 68 Page
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Wavelength Modeling of the Spatially Resolved Debris Disk of HD 107146
    A&A 533, A132 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015910 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Multi-wavelength modeling of the spatially resolved debris disk of HD 107146 S. Ertel1,S.Wolf1, S. Metchev2,G.Schneider3,J.M.Carpenter4,M.R.Meyer5, L. A. Hillenbrand4, and M. D. Silverstone6 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Leibnizstraße 15, 24098 Kiel, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA 3 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 4 Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Straße 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland 6 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Alabama, 326 Gallalee, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA Received 12 October 2010 / Accepted 1 July 2011 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to constrain the location, composition, and dynamical state of planetesimal populations and dust around the young, sun-like (G2 V) star HD 107146. Methods. We consider coronagraphic observations obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (HST/ACS) onboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in broad V (λc ≈ 0.6 μm) and broad I (λc ≈ 0.8 μm) filters, a resolved 1.3 mm map obtained with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA), Spitzer/IRS low resolution spectra in the range of 7.6 μm to 37.0 μm, and the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the object at wavelengths ranging from 3.5 μmto3.1 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • WASP Page 1 Hubble Eyes Aging Stars Science News, Vol. 148
    WASP Warren Astronomical Society Paper Volume 27, number 11 $1.00 for non-members November 1995 DATING THE COSMOS COMPUTER CHATTER ANNUAL HOLIDAY AWARDS Hubble eyes aging stars Larry F. Kalinowski Science News, Vol. 148, September 2,1995 submitted by Lorna Simmons Everyone knows you can't be older than your mother. But over the past year, observations with the Hubble Space Telescope and several other Comet DeVico has just passed perihelion in instruments seem to have contradicted this cardi- early October, so its beginning to fade from its maxi- nal rule. On the one hand, measurements of the mum brightness of 5.6. It was recovered in its seventy- speed at which the most distant galaxies are mov- four year orbit by independent comet observers Naka- ing from Earth suggest that the universe may be mura, Tanaka and Utsunomiya. It becomes a sixth no older than 8 billion to 12 billion years (SN: magnitude object on the night of the Macomb meeting, 10/8;94, p.232). On the other hand, astronomers October 19. Early reports say it has two tails. A morn- ing object, only, about fifteen degrees above the hori- estimate he ages of our galaxy's oldest stars at zon before twilight begins, it's easily observed as it 13 billion to 16 billion years. leaves Leo and enters the Ursa Major-Coma Berenices Now, new findings from Hubble may provide a area of the sky. However, it is quickly moving closer to step toward resolving this cosmic conundrum. the horizon and will become increasingly more difficult In viewing the globular cluster M4, the dense to observe during the rest of the month.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
    A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0705.4290V2 [Astro-Ph] 23 Aug 2007
    DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 11, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/13/06 THE GEMINI DEEP PLANET SURVEY – GDPS∗ DAVID LAFRENIÈREA,RENÉ DOYONA , CHRISTIAN MAROISB ,DANIEL NADEAUA, BEN R. OPPENHEIMERC,PATRICK F. ROCHED , FRANÇOIS RIGAUTE, JAMES R. GRAHAMF ,RAY JAYAWARDHANAG,DOUG JOHNSTONEH,PAUL G. KALASF ,BRUCE MACINTOSHB, RENÉ RACINEA Draft version November 11, 2018 ABSTRACT We present the results of the Gemini Deep Planet Survey, a near-infrared adaptive optics search for giant planets and brown dwarfs around nearby young stars. The observations were obtained with the Altair adaptive optics system at the Gemini North telescope and angular differential imaging was used to suppress the speckle noise of the central star. Detection limits for the 85 stars observed are presented, along with a list of all faint point sources detected around them. Typically, the observations are sensitive to angular separations beyond 0.5′′ with 5σ contrast sensitivities in magnitude difference at 1.6 µm of 9.5 at 0.5′′, 12.9 at 1′′, 15.0 at 2′′, and 16.5 at 5′′. For the typical target of the survey, a 100 Myr old K0 star located 22 pc from the Sun, the observations are sensitive enough to detect planets more massive than 2 MJup with a projected separation in the range 40–200 AU. Depending on the age, spectral type, and distance of the target stars, the detection limit can be as low as 1 MJup. Second epoch observations of 48 stars with candidates (out of 54) have confirmed that all candidates are∼ unrelated background stars. A detailed statistical analysis of the survey results, yielding upper limits on the fractions of stars with giant planet or low mass brown dwarf companions, is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
    geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Sky & Telescope
    TRANSIT MYSTERY Strange sights BINOCULAR TOUR Dive deep into SHOOT THE MOON Take amazing as Mercury crosses the Sun p28 Virgo’s endless pool of galaxies p56 lunar images with your smartphone p38 TEST REPORT Meade’s 25-cm LX600-ACF P62 THE ESSENTIAL MAGAZINE OF ASTRONOMY Lasers and advanced optics are transforming astronomy p20 HOW TO BUY THE RIGHT ASTRO CAMERA p32 p14 ISSUE 93 MAPPING THE BIG BANG’S COSMIC ECHOES $9.50 NZ$9.50 INC GST LPI-GLPI-G LUNAR,LUNAR, PLANETARYPLANETARY IMAGERIMAGER ANDAND GUIDERGUIDER ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY MADE EASY. Let the LPI-G unleash the inner astrophotographer in you. With our solar, lunar and planetary guide camera, experience the universe on a whole new level. 0Image Sensor:'+(* C O LOR 0 Pixel Size / &#*('+ 0Frames per second/Resolution• / • / 0 Image Format: #,+$)!&))'!,# .# 0 Shutter%,*('#(%%#'!"-,,* 0Interface: 0Driver: ASCOM compatible 0GuiderPort: 0Color or Monochrome Models (&#'!-,-&' FEATURED DEALERS: MeadeTelescopes Adelaide Optical Centre | www.adelaideoptical.com.au MeadeInstrument The Binocular and Telescope Shop | www.bintel.com.au MeadeInstruments www.meade.com Sirius Optics | www.sirius-optics.com.au The device to free you from your handbox. With the Stella adapter, you can wirelessly control your GoTo Meade telescope at a distance without being limited by cord length. Paired with our new planetarium app, *StellaAccess, astronomers now have a graphical interface for navigating the night sky. STELLA WI-FI ADAPTER / $#)'$!!+#!+ #$#)'#)$##)$#'&*' / (!-')-$*')!($%)$$+' "!!$#$)(,#%',).( StellaAccess app. Available for use on both phones and tablets. /'$+((()$!'%!#)'*")($'!$)##!'##"$'$*) stars, planets, celestial bodies and more /$,'-),',### -' ($),' /,,,$"$')*!!!()$$"%)!)!($%( STELLA is controlled with Meade’s planetarium app, StellaAccess. Available for purchase for both iOS S and Android systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018
    Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………….……….………..….…… 3 Andrew Gray …………………………………………...………………. 5 The Hyades Star Cluster …...………………………….…….……….. 6 At the Eye Piece …………………………………………….….…….... 9 The Cover Image - Antennae Nebula …….……………………….. 11 Galaxy - Part 2 ….………………………………..………………….... 13 Self-Taught Astronomer …………………………………..………… 21 The Month Ahead …..…………………...….…….……………..…… 24 Minutes of the Previous Meeting …………………………….……. 25 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….……….…..……. 26 Pre-loved Telescope Equipment …………………………...……… 28 ASSA Symposium 2018 ………………………...……….…......…… 29 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, The third month of the year is upon us and already the viewing conditions have been more favourable over the last few nights. Let’s hope it continues and we have clear skies and good viewing for the next five or six months. Our February meeting was well attended, with our main speaker being Dr Matt Hilton from the Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit at UKZN who gave us an excellent presentation on gravity waves. We really have to be thankful to Dr Hilton from ACRU UKZN for giving us his time to give us presentations and hope that we can maintain our relationship with ACRU and that we can draw other speakers from his colleagues and other research students! Thanks must also go to Debbie Abel and Piet Strauss for their monthly presentations on NASA and the sky for the following month, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution
    GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy Special Publications No. 1 George Herbig in 1960 —————————————————————– GEORGE HERBIG and Early Stellar Evolution —————————————————————– Bo Reipurth Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii at Manoa 640 North Aohoku Place Hilo, HI 96720 USA . Dedicated to Hannelore Herbig c 2016 by Bo Reipurth Version 1.0 – April 19, 2016 Cover Image: The HH 24 complex in the Lynds 1630 cloud in Orion was discov- ered by Herbig and Kuhi in 1963. This near-infrared HST image shows several collimated Herbig-Haro jets emanating from an embedded multiple system of T Tauri stars. Courtesy Space Telescope Science Institute. This book can be referenced as follows: Reipurth, B. 2016, http://ifa.hawaii.edu/SP1 i FOREWORD I first learned about George Herbig’s work when I was a teenager. I grew up in Denmark in the 1950s, a time when Europe was healing the wounds after the ravages of the Second World War. Already at the age of 7 I had fallen in love with astronomy, but information was very hard to come by in those days, so I scraped together what I could, mainly relying on the local library. At some point I was introduced to the magazine Sky and Telescope, and soon invested my pocket money in a subscription. Every month I would sit at our dining room table with a dictionary and work my way through the latest issue. In one issue I read about Herbig-Haro objects, and I was completely mesmerized that these objects could be signposts of the formation of stars, and I dreamt about some day being able to contribute to this field of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Counterparts of ROSAT X-Ray Sources in Two Selected Fields at Low
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. sbg˙comsge˙ed c ESO 2018 October 16, 2018 Optical counterparts of ROSAT X-ray sources in two selected fields at low vs. high Galactic latitudes J. Greiner1, G.A. Richter2 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik, 85740 Garching, Germany 2 Sternwarte Sonneberg, 96515 Sonneberg, Germany Received 14 October 2013 / Accepted 12 August 2014 ABSTRACT Context. The optical identification of large number of X-ray sources such as those from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey is challenging with conventional spectroscopic follow-up observations. Aims. We investigate two ROSAT All-Sky Survey fields of size 10◦× 10◦ each, one at galactic latitude b = 83◦ (26 Com), the other at b = –5◦ (γ Sge), in order to optically identify the majority of sources. Methods. We used optical variability, among other more standard methods, as a means of identifying a large number of ROSAT All- Sky Survey sources. All objects fainter than about 12 mag and brighter than about 17 mag, in or near the error circle of the ROSAT positions, were tested for optical variability on hundreds of archival plates of the Sonneberg field patrol. Results. The present paper contains probable optical identifications of altogether 256 of the 370 ROSAT sources analysed. In partic- ular, we found 126 AGN (some of them may be misclassified CVs), 17 likely clusters of galaxies, 16 eruptive double stars (mostly CVs), 43 chromospherically active stars, 65 stars brighter than about 13 mag, 7 UV Cet stars, 3 semiregular resp. slow irregular variable stars of late spectral type, 2 DA white dwarfs, 1 Am star, 1 supernova remnant and 1 planetary nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Report 2006 2007 Published in Spain by the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) ISSN 1575–8966 Legal License: TF–1142 /99
    I SAAC N EWTON G ROUP OF T ELESCOPES Biennial Report 2006 2007 Published in Spain by the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) ISSN 1575–8966 Legal license: TF–1142 /99 Apartado de correos, 321 E-38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma; Canary Islands; Spain Tel: +34 922 425 400 Fax: +34 922 425 401 URL: http://www.ing.iac.es/ Editor and designer: Javier Méndez ([email protected]) Printing: Gráficas Sabater. Tel: +34 922 623 555 Front cover: The Milky Way from the site of the William Herschel Telescope. Credit: Nik Szymanek. Inset: Photograph of the WHT at sunset. Credit: Nik Szymanek. Other picture credits: Nik Szymanek (WHT, p. 4; INT, p. 4; JKT, p. 4; ING, p. 5); Jens Moser (WHT, back; INT, back); Nik Szymanek (JKT, back). The ING Biennial Report is available online at http://www.ing.iac.es/PR/AR/. ISAAC NEWTON GROUP OF TELESCOPES Biennial Report of the STFC-NWO-IAC ING Board 2006 – 2007 ISAAC NEWTON GROUP William Herschel Telescope Isaac Newton Telescope Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope 4 • ING BIENNIAL R EPORT 2006–2007 OF TELESCOPES The Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) consists of the 4.2- metre William Herschel Telescope (WHT), the 2.5-metre Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) and the 1.0-metre Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope (JKT). The ING is located 2350 metres above sea level at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos (ORM) on the island of La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. The WHT is the largest telescope of its kind in Western Europe. The construction, operation, and development of the ING telescopes are the result of a collaboration between the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Spain.
    [Show full text]