DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstracts Bem2015.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstracts Bem2015.Pdf Index (Click a name to view the abstract") A *Behlmer, T.; Douglass, J.D. ............................................ 252 *Abate, M.E. ....................................................................... 297 *Behringer, D.C.; Swett, R.S. ........................................... 190 *Aichelman H.E.1; Townsend J.1; Courtney T.1,2; *Bélanger, D.1; Gagnon, P.2 .............................................. 211 Baumann J.1; Castillo K.D.1 .............................................. 314 *Belgrad, B.; Griffen, B. ................................................... 203 *Alker, A.1,2; de Leon, S.3; Parsons, R.1; Rouja P.4; Voss, J. D.2 .......................................................................................... 31 *Belley, R.1*; Snelgrove, P.V.R.1; Juniper, S.K.2; Archambault, P.3 ................................................................ 223 *Altieri, A.H.1; Witman, J.D.2 ........................................... 118 *Benestan, L.; Gosselin, T.1; Perrier, C.1; Rochette, R.2; *Ambrose Jr., W.G. 1,2,3; Panieri G.1; Carroll M.1,3; Bernatchez, L.1 ................................................................... 259 Schneider A.1; Åstrøm E.1; Svenning, M.4; Faverola, A.1, Locke W.2 .............................................................................. 44 *Bertness, M.D.1; Brisson, C.P.1; Coverdale, T.C.2; Bevil, M.C.1; Crotty, S.M.1; *Suglia, E.R.1 ................................. 127 *Ambrose W.G. Jr.1,4; Retelle, M.J.5 .................................. 41 *Blakeslee, A.M.H.1,2; Keogh, C.L.3; Fowler, A.E.2,4; *Anderson Lively, J.A.; Alford, A. B. .............................. 236 Griffen, B.D.5 ........................................................................ 46 *Angelica J. Adrian; Kamel, S.J. ...................................... 272 *Blomberg, B.N.1; Beseres Pollack, J.2; Montagna, P.1 .. 269 *Angelini, C.1; van der Heide, T.2; Griffin, T.N.3; *Bonsell, C.E.; Dunton K.H. ............................................... 43 Morton, J.P.4; Derksen-Hooijberg, M.2; Lamers, L.P.M.2; Smolders, A.J.P2; Silliman, B.R.4 .................................... 219 *Bove, C.B.; Whitehead, R.F.; Szmant, A.M. ................. 210 *Annette F. Govindarajan; Jesús Pineda; Mike Purcell; *Bradley D.1; Gladstone W.1; Gribben P.E.2 ..................... 47 John A. Breier .................................................................... 301 *Brinkhuis, V.1, Lunz, K.1, Landsberg, J.1; Kiryu, Y.1, *Artim, J.M.; Sikkel, P.C. ................................................. 319 Sharp, K.2, Peters, E.3, Gilliam D.S.4 ................................ 329 *Åström E1,2; Carroll M.L 1,3; Ambrose W.G. Jr.1,3,4; *Brown, S.W.; Eggleston, D.B.; Bohnenstiehl, D.R. ....... 189 Silyakova A1,2; Andreassen K1,2.; Carroll J 1,2,3.................. 42 *Butler, C.B.1; Matthews, T.R. 1; Gutzler, B.C.2 ............. 234 *Atkins, R.L.1*; Griffin, J.N.1,2; Angelini, C.3 ; O’Connor, M.I.4 ; Silliman, B.R.1,5....................................................... 355 *Butler, J.; Butler, M. ....................................................... 285 B *Butler, Mark1; Don Behringer2 ........................................ 91 1 1,3 2 3 *B. Gambrel1; H.R. Lasker1,2* .......................................... 316 *Byers, J.E. ; Smith, R.S. ; Pringle, J.M. ; Clark, G.F. ; Gribben, P.E.4; Hewitt, C.L.5; ............................................ 48 *Baillie, C.; Grabowski, J. ................................................... 70 C *Bateson, C.B.; Boyle, E.; Trapp, K.; Johnson, L.M.; Kelly, K.; Harper, F.M. ..................................................... 253 *Calabrese N.M.: Taylor D.L. .......................................... 114 *Baumann J.1; Courtney T.1, Davies S.W.1; Aichelman *Calderwood, J.1,2*; O’Connor, N.1,2; Roberts, D.1,2 ....... 232 H.E.1; Townsend J.1; Lima F.P.2; ..................................... 313 *Campbell, J.1; Johnston, L.1; Paul, V.1; Kuempel, C.2; *Bayer, S.R.; Wahle, R.A.; Brady, D.C.; Jumars, P.A. .. 291 Altieri, A.2; Duffy, E.3 .......................................................... 29 *Beauchesne, D.; Faille, G.; Grant, C.; Archambault, P.; *Carlston A.J. 1; Vandenberg M.H.1; Fradkin S.2; Weisz Brêthes, J.-C. ...................................................................... 187 J.B.1 ..................................................................................... 186 *Beauvois, J; *Weissburg, M.J. ........................................ 112 *Carroll M.L.1; Mette, M. 2; Ballesta Artero, I.3; Wanamaker, A.D.2; Witbaard, R.3; ................................... 41 *Beekey M.A.; Mattei J.H. ................................................ 185 *Carroll, J.M.1; Stubler A.D.2; Peterson B.J.2; Finelli, *Deignan, L.K; Pawlik, J. ................................................. 302 C.M.1 ................................................................................... 354 *DeLeo, D.M.; Lengyel, S.D.; Cordes, E.E. ..................... 197 *Castellano, C.L.; Bologna, P.A.X.; Gaynor, J.J.; Meredith, R.W. ................................................................... 157 *Denhart, M.H., Hammerquist, A.M., Creech M.K., Weisz J.B. ...................................................................................... 146 *Chak, S.T.C.; Duffy, J.E.; Song, B. ................................ 231 *Deschênes, S.M.; Mattei, J.; Beekey, M.A. .................... 276 *Chan, A.N.1; Devlin-Durante, M.K.1; Lewis, C.2; Lunz, K.S.3; Neely, K.L.3; Baums, I.B.1 ...................................... 254 *Dias, G.M.1; Oricchio, F.T.1; Dutra, F.S.1; Pastro, G.1; Vieira, E.A.2; Flores, A.A.V.3; Gibran, F.Z. 1 .................. 139 *Chase, A.L.1; Dijkstra, J.A.2; Harris, L.G.1 ................... 152 *Dijkstra, J.A.1*; Mello, K.1; Litterer, A.1; Wells, C.2; *Chen, H.1; Haggerty, S.2; Crotty, S.2; Bertness, M.2 ....... 27 Harris, L.G.3; Ware, C.1 ...................................................... 65 *Cheng, H.1, 2; Watson, W.H. III1 ..................................... 188 *Diskin, M.S.; Smee, D.L. ................................................. 121 *Chin, D.W.; Peterson, B.J. .............................................. 143 *Dodd, L.F1; Caracappa, J.C.2; Piehler, M.F.1; Grabowski, J.H.3 ..................................................................................... 164 *Cimon, S.1,2; Cusson, M. 1,2 .............................................. 151 *Donelan, S.C.; Trussell, G.C. .......................................... 134 *Clark, A.1*; Behringer, D.C.1,2; Waltzek, T.B.3.............. 274 *Douglass, J.G. ..................................................................... 21 *Clowes, E.L.; Lively, J.A. ................................................ 237 *Dudas, S.E.; Mohns, K., .................................................... 79 *Cobleigh, K.A.; Foguel, A.; Roycroft, M.; Armstrong, P.; Castillo, K.D. ........................................................................ 35 *Dudgeon, S.R.1; Petraitis, P.S.2 ....................................... 158 *Coelho M.A.G1; Lasker H.R.12 ........................................ 288 *Duermit, E.1,2; Wilber, D.2 .............................................. 235 *Colella, M. A.; Ruzicka, R.R.; Brinkhuis, V.; Kidney, Duffy, J. E ........................................................................... 221 J.A.; Bartlett, L.; Macaulay, K. ........................................ 322 *Dunic, J.C.; Hensel, M.S.; Kearns, P.J.; Honig, A.; *Colvard, N.; Helmuth, B. ................................................. 212 Acuna-Hurtado, D.; Ingty, T.; Wilson, A.; Byrnes, J.E.K. ............................................................................................. 103 *Correia, K. B.; Gilliam, D. S. .......................................... 262 *Durkin, A.; Cordes, E.E. ................................................. 198 *Correia, K.M.; Schroeder, K.J.; Smee, D.L. .................... 15 E *Costa, P.1; Dórea, A. 1; Neto, E.M.2; *Barros F.1 ............. 90 *E. J. Simonson1; R. E. Scheibling1; A. Metaxas2 ............. 20 *Crickenberger, S. ; Wethey, D. ....................................... 299 Easton, E.E.;1 *Thistle, D.1; Spears, T.2 ........................... 196 *Crotty, S.; Bertness, M. ................................................... 133 *Edquist, S.K.; Harris, L.G. ............................................. 163 *Crow, K.D. ........................................................................ 248 *Edwards, M.S.1; Konar, B.K.2 ........................................ 228 *Cuellar-Gempeler, C. ....................................................... 154 *Elliott J.; Patterson M.; Dwyer A. .................................. 215 *Cumming, K.1; Walker, B.K1; Miller, C.2 ...................... 159 *Elliott, S.M. ...................................................................... 339 *Curtis, J.S.; Albins, M.A; Stallings, C.D. ......................... 71 1 1 2 D *Ellrich, J.A. ; Scrosati, R.A. ; Molis, M. ..................... 281 Engel, J.D. .......................................................................... 193 *Darnell, K.; Baustian, M.; Hijuelos, A.C.; Moss, L.C.; Carruthers, T.J.B. .............................................................. 180 *Ewers-Saucedo, C.; Pappalardo, P.; Wares, J.P. .......... 283 *Davoult, D.1,2; Surget, G.3,4; Stiger-Pouvreau, V.3,4; Noisette, F.1,2; Riera, P.1,2; ................................................... 59 *Gerwing, T.G.1; Drolet, D.2; Barbeau, M.A.1; Hamilton, F D.J.2 ..................................................................................... 120 *Feehan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Sponges of the Genus Agelas (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Greater Caribbean
    Zootaxa 3794 (3): 301–343 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3794.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51852298-F299-4392-9C89-A6FD14D3E1D0 Reef sponges of the genus Agelas (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the Greater Caribbean FERNANDO J. PARRA-VELANDIA1,2, SVEN ZEA2,4 & ROB W. M. VAN SOEST3 1St John's Island Marine Laboratory, Tropical Marine Science Institute (TMSI), National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227. E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Caribe, Centro de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar—CECIMAR; c/o INVEMAR, Calle 25 2- 55, Rodadero Sur, Playa Salguero, Santa Marta, Colombia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, P.O.Box 9517 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 301 Introduction . 302 The genus Agelas in the Greater Caribbean . 302 Material and methods . 303 Classification . 304 Phylum Porifera Grant, 1835 . 304 Class Demospongiae Sollas, 1875 . 304 Order Agelasida Hartman, 1980 . 304 Family Agelasidae Verrill, 1907 . 304 Genus Agelas Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 304 Agelas dispar Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 306 Agelas cervicornis (Schmidt, 1870) . 311 Agelas wiedenmayeri Alcolado, 1984. 313 Agelas sceptrum (Lamarck, 1815) . 315 Agelas dilatata Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 . 316 Agelas conifera (Schmidt, 1870). 318 Agelas tubulata Lehnert & van Soest, 1996 . 321 Agelas repens Lehnert & van Soest, 1998. 324 Agelas cerebrum Assmann, van Soest & Köck, 2001. 325 Agelas schmidti Wilson, 1902 .
    [Show full text]
  • Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Effects of Fucus Vesiculosus Extract on Cultured Human Lymphocytes Using the Chromosome Aberration and Comet Assays
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30, 1, 105-111 (2007) Copyright by the Brazilian Society of Genetics. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br Research Article Genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of Fucus vesiculosus extract on cultured human lymphocytes using the chromosome aberration and Comet assays Cleide Leite-Silva1, Cássia Lima Silva Gusmão1, Catarina Satie Takahashi1,2 1Departamento de Genética, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 2Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Abstract The brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus (Fucales, Fucaceae) was screened for its protective activity using doxo- rubicin-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes. In this study, we assessed the genotoxic and antigenotoxic potential of three different concentrations (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg mL-1)ofF. vesiculosus aqueous extract using the chromosome aberration and Comet assays. Treatment of human lymphocyte cultures with 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg mL-1 F. vesiculosus aqueous extract had no effect on the chromosome aberration frequency or on the extent of DNA dam- age detected by the Comet assay. The antigenotoxic effects of the extract were tested in human lymphocyte cultures treated with 15 μgmL-1 of doxorubicin, either alone or combined with the different concentrations of the extract, which was added to the cultures before, simultaneously with or after the doxorubicin. Only when lymphocytes were pre-treated with extract there was a reduction in doxorubicin-induced chromosome aberrations and DNA damage as detected by the Comet assay.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
    Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2021 FALL 2021 Dear Readers
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS FALL 2021 FALL 2021 Dear Readers, Welcome to the University of California Press Fall 2021 1 TRADE catalog—as always, a labor of intellect and heart that brings 17 ACADEMIC TRADE news of expert works on the most pressing issues of the day. 39 ART 46 NEW IN PAPERBACK Let’s start with two of the most central issues of the past year: 55 SOCIAL SCIENCES racial justice and the pandemic. In Blue Eyes, Brown Eyes, 65 POLITICAL SCIENCE acclaimed writer Stephen G. Bloom tells the inside story of one 66 HISTORY teacher’s famed, flawed, and immensely consequential social 72 FILM & MEDIA STUDIES experiment conducted to reveal the pernicious consequences 74 MUSIC of bias and stigma. In A Field Guide to White Supremacy, well-known public intellectuals define the contours of one of 74 LITERARY COLLECTIONS the most enduring threats we face. And from the front lines 75 LANGUAGE ARTS of the pandemic, we bring you the Auntie Sewing Squad, 76 LAW the intrepid collective known as A.S.S., which in the face of 77 BUSINESS government inaction, set up production lines in their living 77 TECHNOLOGY rooms to save the world, one mask at a time. 78 BACKLIST HIGHLIGHTS 81 SALES INFO I also wanted to call attention to two titles that have both 83 INDEX OF AUTHORS AND immediate and international resonance. In the fall, the San TITLES Francisco Bay Area experienced a stunning twelve weeks of fire. We all live in the “age of fire”—the Pyrocene. But, as Stephen Pyne argues, we still have a chance to salvage our future.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Acronicta Rubticoma Guenee. Black Light; Lakehurst, June 4. Acronicta Dactylina Grote, Melanic Form
    VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1 3 NOcruIDAE Acronicta rubTicoma Guenee. Black light; Lakehurst, June 4. Acronicta dactylina Grote, melanic form. Black light; Lebanon, June 27. A new record for the State. Eurois occulta Linnaeus. Black light; Montague, August 27. Oncocnemis saundersiana Grote. Black light; Lebanon, October 28. Agrotis buchholzi Barnes & Benjamin. Black light, Lakehurst, June 4. Eupsilia morrisoni Grote. Black light; Lebanon, November 18 and 23. Neperigea costa Barnes & Benjamin. Black light; Montague, July 27. A new record for the State. Magusa orbifera, "divaricata" Grote. Black light, Lebanon, August 21. Amolita roseola Smith. Black light; Montague, July 30. A new record for the State. Abrostola urentis Guenee. Black light; Montague, October 10. Catocala maestosa Hulst. Bait trap; Lebanon, August 28. A new record for the State. Zale phaeocapna Franclemont. Black light; Lebanon, April 27. Deter­ mined by genitalic dissection. A new record for the State. Zale metatoides McDunnough. Black light; Montague, June 10. A new record for the State. Gabara pulverosalis Walker. Black light; Lakehurst August 14. A new record for the State. Rivula propinqaZis Guenee. Black light; Lebanon, October 28. I wish to thank C. F. dos Passos and A. E. Brower for determining some of the specimens. A NEW SUBSPECIES OF BREPHIDIUM EXILIS FROM YUCATAN (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) HARTIY K. CLENCH Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 Some years ago Eduardo C. Welling, of Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, sent me a few specimens of a Brephidium he had taken on the north coast of Yucatan. It was obvious, as soon as they had been examined genitalically, that they represented exilis Boisduval, but they belonged to 4 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants and Ecology 2013:2
    Fucus radicans – Reproduction, adaptation & distribution patterns by Ellen Schagerström Plants & Ecology The Department of Ecology, 2013/2 Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University Fucus radicans - Reproduction, adaptation & distribution patterns by Ellen Schagerström Supervisors: Lena Kautsky & Sofia Wikström Plants & Ecology The Department of Ecology, 2013/2 Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University Plants & Ecology The Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm Sweden © The Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences ISSN 1651-9248 Printed by FMV Printcenter Cover: Fucus radicans and Fucus vesiculosus together in a tank. Photo by Ellen Schagerström Summary The Baltic Sea is considered an ecological marginal environment, where both marine and freshwater species struggle to adapt to its ever changing conditions. Fucus vesiculosus (bladderwrack) is commonly seen as the foundation species in the Baltic Sea, as it is the only large perennial macroalgae, forming vast belts down to a depth of about 10 meters. The salinity gradient results in an increasing salinity stress for all marine organisms. This is commonly seen in many species as a reduction in size. What was previously described as a low salinity induced dwarf morph of F. vesiculosus was recently proved to be a separate species, when genetic tools were used. This new species, Fucus radicans (narrow wrack) might be the first endemic species to the Baltic Sea, having separated from its mother species F. vesiculosus as recent as 400 years ago. Fucus radicans is only found in the Bothnian Sea and around the Estonian island Saaremaa. The Swedish/Finnish populations have a surprisingly high level of clonality.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Literature Review on Valuable Compounds and Extraction Technologies: the Eastern Baltic Sea Seaweeds
    Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 178–195 https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-0065 https://content.sciendo.com Comprehensive Literature Review on Valuable Compounds and Extraction Technologies: The Eastern Baltic Sea Seaweeds Karīna BĀLIŅA1*, Kaspars IVANOVS2, Francesco ROMAGNOLI3, Dagnija BLUMBERGA4 1, 3, 4 Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Āzenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV1048, Latvia 2 Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment “BIOR”, Lejupes iela 3 Riga, LV1076, Latvia Abstract – Seaweed valuables have been researched a lot in the last decades but there is a lack of information on brackish seaweed at the eastern part of the Baltic Sea. Previous research shows that Baltic seaweed can be used as a source for phycocolloids as well as for bioenergy. The amount of available usable biomass is not clear, also seaweed in brackish seawater does not reach the dimensions such as the same species in Western parts of the Baltic Sea where the salinity is higher. Therefore, the use of this biomass must be smart to create economic benefit. Three abundant Baltic brackish seaweed species were chosen, to represent green, brown and red seaweed groups and an in-depth information analysis was made to clarify possible focus substances that could be extracted from these species. In this paper we summarize literature of common seaweed components, traditional extraction technology, and potential amount in seaweed and give an overview of novel methods for extraction of seaweed bioactive compounds. Keywords – Bioeconomy; extraction; Fucus vesiculosus; Furcellaria lumbricalis; macroalgae; phytobenthos; Ulva sp. 1. INTRODUCTION Biorefinery is an important part of the biobased economy and biotechonomy integrating different biomass conversion processes to produce energy and value-added products into a single facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlin Marine Information Network Information on the Species and Habitats Around the Coasts and Sea of the British Isles
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Spiral wrack (Fucus spiralis) MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Review Nicola White 2008-05-29 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1337]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: White, N. 2008. Fucus spiralis Spiral wrack. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinsp.1337.1 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date: 2008-05-29 Spiral wrack (Fucus spiralis) - Marine Life Information Network See online review for distribution map Detail of Fucus spiralis fronds. Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Photographer: Keith Hiscock Biogeographic Information System (OBIS).
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program And
    NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program and Abstracts of the 110th Annual Meeng March 18 – 22, 2018 Seale, Washington NSA 110th ANNUAL MEETING National Shellfisheries Association Renaissance Hotel, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON March 18 – March 22, 2018 SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2018 6:30 PM STUDENT ORIENTATION (Foyer outside Courtyard Ballroom) 7:00 PM PRESIDENT’S RECEPTION Courtyard Ballroom MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 6:30-8:00 AM STUDENT BREAKFAST (students only) South 8:00-8:50 AM PLENARY LECTURE: Suzanne Williams (Natural History Museum, London) Courtyard Ballroom Federal Superior Municipal James North SHELLFISH LEASING AND GENETICS, THE SHRIMP OLYMPIA PERMITTING WORKSHOP: 9:00-10:30 AM GENOMICS, AND EPIGENOME OYSTERS CASE STUDIES FOR OVERCOMING SCALLOPS BREEDING (SHRIMPENCODE) COMMON LEGAL BARRIERS PROJECT 10:30-11:00AM MORNING BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME 11:00-12:30PM GENOMICS, AND SCALLOPS OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) BREEDING PROJECT 12:30-1:30 PM LUNCH BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME 1:30-2:15 PM GENOMICS, AND SCALLOPS OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) BREEDING PROJECT THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME GENERAL 2:15-3:00 PM GENOMICS, AND OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) CONTRIBUTED I BREEDING PROJECT 3:00-3:30 PM AFTERNOON BREAK THE SHRIMP GENETICS, OLYMPIA COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND EPIGENOME GENERAL 3:30-6:00 PM GENOMICS, AND OYSTERS ENGAGING FISHERMEN (SHRIMPENCODE) CONTRIBUTED I BREEDING PROJECT TUESDAY,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]