DOCSLIB.ORG

North County Cities & Special Districts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North County Cities & Special Districts North County Cities & Special Districts Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Study San Mateo Local Agency Formation Commission September 16, 2015 North County Cities and Special Districts MSR-SOI Study San Mateo LAFCo PREPARED FOR: SAN MATEO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION __________________________________________________________ COMMISSIONERS Linda Craig, Chair, Public Member Joshua Cosgrove, Vice Chair, Special District Member Rich Garbarino, City Member Mike O’Neill, City Member Don Horsley, County Member Adrienne Tissier, County Member Joseph Sheridan, Special District Member ALTERNATE MEMBERS Ray Mueller, City Member Warren Slocum, County Member Sepi Richardson, Public Member Ric Lohman, Special District Member STAFF Martha Poyatos, Executive Officer Rebecca Archer, Deputy County Counsel Jean Brook, Commission Clerk September 16, 2015 Page 1 of 242 North County Cities and Special Districts MSR-SOI Study San Mateo LAFCo Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 10 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 16 Municipal Service Reviews ...................................................................................................................... 16 Spheres of Influence ............................................................................................................................... 17 III. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 19 Bay Area Overview .................................................................................................................................. 19 Table III-1, Bay Area Population, Employment and Housing Projections, 2010-2040 ........................ 19 San Mateo County................................................................................................................................... 19 Table III-2, Bay Area Population Growth by County, 2010-2040 ........................................................ 20 Water Supply Reliability and Policy Issues – San Mateo County and California ..................................... 20 IV. AGENCY PROFILES/MSR-SOI DETERMINATIONS ..................................................................... 22 CITY OF BRISBANE ............................................................................................................................ 23 Overview/History .................................................................................................................................... 23 Table IV-1, City of Brisbane Agency Profile ......................................................................................... 24 Exhibit IV-1, City of Brisbane Boundary and Sphere of Influence ....................................................... 26 Growth and Population ........................................................................................................................... 27 Table IV-2, City of Brisbane Population Trends .................................................................................. 27 Sphere of Influence ................................................................................................................................. 28 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ....................................................................................... 29 Municipal Services .................................................................................................................................. 30 Table IV-3, City of Brisbane Municipal Services .................................................................................. 30 Table IV-4, Sworn Officer Personnel per 1,000 Population ................................................................ 31 Table IV-5, Annual Composite Crime Rate Comparison (per 100,000 population) ............................ 31 Table IV-6, Police Response Time Comparison – Priority 1 Calls ........................................................ 32 Table IV-7, Emergency Medical Service Response Times ................................................................... 33 Table IV-8, Fire Incident Response (Minutes/% of times) .................................................................. 34 Table IV-9, Cost of Service, Fire and Emergency Response* .............................................................. 34 Table IV-10, Site/Facility Inspections (Property/Building Inspections Completed within established timelines) ............................................................................................................................................ 34 September 16, 2015 Page 2 of 242 North County Cities and Special Districts MSR-SOI Study San Mateo LAFCo Table IV-11, Past/Current Water Purchases from San Francisco Public Utilities Commission ........... 36 Financing Constraints and Opportunities ............................................................................................... 39 Table IV-12, City’s Statement of Net Position as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands) ............................. 40 Table IV-13, City of Brisbane, General Fund Revenues and Expenditures.......................................... 42 Table IV-14, General Revenue Per Capita – Bay Area Cities ............................................................... 43 Table IV-15, Agency Water Rate Comparison (monthly) .................................................................... 44 Table IV-16, Sewer Rate Comparison by Agency ................................................................................ 44 Shared Services & Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 46 Accountability & Alternative Governance Options ................................................................................. 47 Recommended Municipal Service Review Determinations .................................................................... 48 Recommended Sphere of Influence Update/Determinations ................................................................ 51 GUADALUPE VALLEY MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ............................................................... 52 Overview/History .................................................................................................................................... 52 Table IV-17, District Profile – Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District ............................. 54 Exhibit IV-2, Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District Boundary/Sphere of Influence ...... 55 Growth and Population ........................................................................................................................... 56 Sphere of Influence ................................................................................................................................. 56 District Operations .................................................................................................................................. 56 District Financial Overview ..................................................................................................................... 57 Table IV-18, GVMID 3-Year Budget Trends ......................................................................................... 57 Table IV-19, Past/Current Water Purchases from San Francisco Public Utilities Commission ........... 59 Table IV-20, Agency Water Rate Comparison (monthly) .................................................................... 59 Table IV-21, Sewer Rate Comparison by Agency ................................................................................ 60 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ....................................................................................... 60 Government Structure Alternatives/Accountability ............................................................................... 60 Recommended Municipal Service Review Determinations .................................................................... 62 Recommended Sphere of Influence Update/Determinations ................................................................ 64 BAYSHORE SANITARY DISTRICT ........................................................................................................ 66 Overview/History .................................................................................................................................... 66 Table IV-22, Bayshore Sanitary District Agency Profile ....................................................................... 67 Population/Growth ................................................................................................................................. 70 September 16, 2015 Page 3 of 242 North County Cities and Special Districts MSR-SOI Study San Mateo LAFCo Sphere of Influence ................................................................................................................................. 70 District Operations .................................................................................................................................. 70 District Financial Overview ..................................................................................................................... 71 Table IV-23, Bayshore Sanitary District, Three-Year Revenue/Expenditure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report – 2009
    Below is an Electronic Version of an Out-of-Print Publication You can scroll to view or print this publication here, or you can borrow a paper copy from the Texas State Library, 512-463-5455. You can also view a copy at the TCEQ Library, 512-239-0020, or borrow one through your branch library using interlibrary loan. The TCEQ’s current print publications are listed in our catalog at www.tceq.texas.gov/publications/ This document is out of print, and should be used for historical reference only. August 2010 SFR-056/09 Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report – 2009 Prepared by the Texas Groundwater Protection Committee Contributing State Agencies and Organizations Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Water Development Board Railroad Commission of Texas Texas Department of State Health Services Texas Department of Agriculture Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Texas AgriLife Research Bureau of Economic Geology Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation printed on recycled paper Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report—2009 Prepared by Texas Groundwater Protection Committee SFR-056/09 August 2010 TEXAS GROUNDWATER PROTECTION COMMITTEE <www.tgpc.state.tx.us> Committee Membership Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Water Development Board Railroad Commission of Texas Department of State Health Services Texas Department of Agriculture Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Texas AgriLife Research Bureau of Economic Geology Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation The Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report was designed and produced by the Texas Groundwater Protection Committee in fulfillment of requirements given in Section 26.406 of the Texas Water Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Express Route Profiles
    Reimagine SamTrans Existing Conditions Analysis of SamTrans Local and Express Routes This report describes SamTrans’ fixed local and express routes, including route characteristics, service span, frequency, destinations served, ridership, and schedule adherence/on-time performance. Ridership maps accompany each route profile. These maps depict boardings and alightings at each stop for each direction based on Automatic Passenger Count (APC) data provided by SamTrans for April 2019. The Reimagine SamTrans project team evaluated each route in the system in order to make proposals for the new network alternatives that would improve the function and efficiency of each existing bus route. REIMAGINE SAMTRANS Existing Conditions Analysis ROUTE 17 Route Characteristics Route 17 runs between Pacifica and Half Moon Bay, travelling through Montara, Moss Beach, and El Weekday Granada. The route serves the Linda Mar Park & Ride, Start Time 5:30 a.m. where riders can transfer to additional SamTrans routes. Key destinations along the route include Linda End Time 8:20 p.m. Mar Shopping Center, Half Moon Bay Airport, and Boardings 503 Nurseryman’s Exchange North and South. Service Hours 29.1 During weekdays there is one round trip in the morning Boardings per Service Hour 17.3 and one round trip in the evening that continues through Half Moon Bay to Pescadero. This extension Peak Headway 30 provides service to the rural areas south of Half Moon Off-Peak Headway 60 Bay. There is also limited service from Miramontes/Moonridge to Canada Cove which operates On Time 94% Schedule throughout the week. Early 1% Adherence Weekday service operates between 5:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Review of ADU Policy
    TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY 7:00 PM – Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Wednesday, November 7, 2018 Historic Schoolhouse 765 Portola Road, Portola Valley, CA 94028 _____________________________________________________________________________ REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Commissioners Hasko, Kopf-Sill, Taylor, Vice-Chair Goulden, Chair Targ ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject may do so now. Please note, however, that the Planning Commission is not able to undertake extended discussion or action tonight on items not on the agenda. OLD BUSINESS 1. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): Review of Additional Information and Preliminary Code Outline (Staff: A. Cassidy) COMMISSION, STAFF, COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2. Commission Reports 3. Staff Report 4. News Digest: Planning Issues of the Day APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. Planning Commission Meeting of October 17, 2018 ADJOURNMENT ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (650) 851-1700. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the Town Council or Commissions regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at Town Hall located 765 Portola Road, Portola Valley, CA during normal business hours. Copies of all agenda reports and supporting data are available for viewing and inspection at Town Hall and at the Portola Valley Library located adjacent to Town Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • To December 31, 2021 the Los Angeles Acting Conservatory
    *Catalog effective: March 1, 2020 (TBD by approval) to December 31, 2021 The Los Angeles Acting Conservatory (LAAC) is a private institution and is seeking approval for operation by the Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE). Approval to operate means the institution is compliant with the minimum standards contained in the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 (as amended) and Division 7.5 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations. www.bppe.ca.gov This catalog is reviewed and updated each school year. As a prospective student, you are encouraged to review this catalog prior to signing an enrollment agreement. You are also encouraged to review the School Performance Fact Sheet, which must be provided to you prior to signing an enrollment agreement. You may request a copy of the catalog and SPFS by emailing [email protected] 1 Location & Contact Info 3 History 4 Purpose 4 Mission 4 Objectives 4 Educational Programs 5 Associate Degree in Acting 5 Associate Degree in Filmmaking 16 Admission Requirements 22 Financial Aid Policy 25 Return & Cancellation Policies 26 Notice Concerning Transferability of Units Earned at Our School 28 Attendance & Scheduling Policy 29 Student Services 31 Academic & Grading Policy 33 Licensing & Approvals 37 Facility & Equipment 39 Library Resources 40 Disciplinary Policy 43 Code of Conduct 47 International Student Information 53 Faculty 57 Academic Calendar 65 2 Location & Contact Info Nestled between a café, salon, retail shops, and a popular restaurant, Edgemar Center for the Arts is the anchor of the Edgemar complex on Main Street in Santa Monica. A couple blocks away from the beach, near the 10 freeway, the Los Angeles Acting Conservatory (LAAC) is housed in its own state-of-the-art building design by renowned architect Frank Gehry, which includes two theater spaces and an art gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1, 2020 (TBD by Approval) to December 31, 2021
    *Catalog effective: March 1, 2020 (TBD by approval) to December 31, 2021 The Los Angeles Acting Conservatory (LAAC) is a private institution approved for operation by the Bureau of Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE). Approval to operate means the institution is compliant with the minimum standards contained in the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 (as amended) and Division 7.5 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations. www.bppe.ca.gov This catalog is reviewed and updated each school year. As a prospective student, you are encouraged to review this catalog prior to signing an enrollment agreement. You are also encouraged to review the School Performance Fact Sheet, which must be provided to you prior to signing an enrollment agreement. You may request a copy of the catalog and SPFS by emailing [email protected] 1 Location & Contact Info 3 History 4 Purpose 4 Mission 4 Objectives 4 Educational Programs 5 Associate Degree in Acting 5 Associate Degree in Filmmaking 16 Admission Requirements 22 Financial Aid Policy 25 Return & Cancellation Policies 26 Notice Concerning Transferability of Units Earned at Our School 28 Attendance & Scheduling Policy 29 Student Services 31 Academic & Grading Policy 33 Licensing & Approvals 37 Facility & Equipment 39 Library Resources 40 Disciplinary Policy 43 Code of Conduct 47 International Student Information 53 Faculty 57 Academic Calendar 65 2 Location & Contact Info Nestled between a café, salon, retail shops, and a popular restaurant, Edgemar Center for the Arts is the anchor of the Edgemar complex on Main Street in Santa Monica. A couple blocks away from the beach, near the 10 freeway, the Los Angeles Acting Conservatory (LAAC) is housed in its own state-of-the-art building design by renowned architect Frank Gehry, which includes two theater spaces and an art gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 CMC CHA Report FINAL.Pdf
    1 Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Current Environment ............................................................................................................................... 4 2021 RVCHA Key Findings ........................................................................................................................ 5 Mental Health ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Socioeconomic Factors ........................................................................................................................ 6 Primary Care ........................................................................................................................................ 6 COVID-19 ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Board Adoption ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... 8 Project Management Team ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing for Economic Development: Lessons from Leading Life Sciences Regions
    Organizing for Economic Development: Lessons from Leading Life Sciences Regions Prepared for: Detroit Renaissance July 31, 2007 Submitted by: 2610 N. Key Boulevard PO Box 100127 Arlington, VA 22201 Arlington, VA 22210 703-725-6575 703-522-4980 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 5 Case Profile: Baltimore-Washington, DC......................................................................... 11 Case Profile: Boston ......................................................................................................... 16 Case Profile: Cleveland..................................................................................................... 22 Case Profile: Los Angeles................................................................................................. 27 Case Profile: New York.................................................................................................... 31 Case Profile: Philadelphia................................................................................................. 37 Case Profile: Raleigh-Durham.......................................................................................... 43 Case Profile: San Diego.................................................................................................... 50 Case Profile: San Francisco .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica
    SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS :: PRIME PICO BOULEVARD :: SANTA MONICA Term 85% SBA Financing for an Owner/User WSJ Prime + 1.5%-2.5 depending on Buyer SBA Financing Description experience, financial strength & Resume. Down Payment 15% Down Payment to a Qualified Borrower $18,725-$20,515 per month depending on Monthly Payment Buyer Qualification Property Address 3317 W. Pico Boulevard City State Zip Los Angeles, CA 90405 APN 4274-036-027 Zoning SMC2 Year Built 1974 Building Size Approx. 2,040sf Parcel Size Approx. 6,777 sf Topography Flat (Minimal Slope) Single Story with 3 Auto Bays & abundant on-site parking with terrific visibility. The property has access from both Pico Blvd and the Alley in the rear. The subject property is also visible from the 10 Freeway. Located in Santa Monica just West of Centinela on Pico Boulevard. SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS PRIME PICO BOULEVARD IN SANTA MONICA SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS PRIME PICO BOULEVARD IN SANTA MONICA ❖ Single Story with 3 Auto Bays & abundant on-site parking with terrific visibility ❖ Prime Pico Blvd in the City of Santa Monica. ❖ 2,040sq.ft. Auto with 3 bays and a huge lot of 6,777sq.ft. ❖ Access to both Pico Blvd and the alley behind. ❖ The Property is being sold AS IS, WHERE IS. ❖ Bring your investors, developers and perfect for an Owner/User. SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS PRIME PICO BOULEVARD IN SANTA MONICA SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS PRIME PICO BOULEVARD IN SANTA MONICA SINGLE - STORY WITH 3 AUTO BAYS PRIME PICO BOULEVARD IN SANTA MONICA 1 9080 W Pico Blvd Los
    [Show full text]
  • Guest Services Brochure
    SUMMER GUEST SERVICES Conference & Event Services A Guide to the SF State Residential Community Conference & Event Services 800 Font Boulevard San Francisco, CA 94132 Phone: (415) 338-3972 Fax: (415) 405-0393 Email: [email protected] Web: summerconf.sfsu.edu About the Residential Community Situated in the southwest corner of the SF Linens and Cleaning State campus, the SF State residential Linens are provided only to conference community offers conference organizers the groups who purchased them in advance. convenience of having two conference centers, a dining center, market store, and • A standard linen packet is left on each bed housing for 2500 guests in one central area. (beds are not made in advance) • Guests are provided a blanket, pillow, The residential community can accommodate guests in traditional residence halls, Jr. suites, mattress pad, comforter, bed linen (two apartment style living, and townhouses. All sheets and pillow case), two bath towels, housing accommodations reside in the heart and soap of the residential community right on campus. • Groups staying 7 days or longer can have The facilities within the community are wired their towels and linens exchanged once a for Ethernet access and WiFi which are week at a pre-arranged day/time complimentary for all guests and visitors. • Daily housekeeping service is not Stop by the front desk of each building for provided access codes and passwords. • Please speak with your Summer Coordinator or Community Assistant for designated location for linen exchanges. Front Desk The community desks are staffed by Summer Community Assistants knowledgable Residential Services Assistants Along with Summer Coordinators, we have a (RSAs).
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Lives and Saving Money
    Saving Lives and Saving Money The Case for Harm Reduction in Kanawha County, WV Saving Lives and Saving Money: The Case for Harm Reduction in Kanawha County, WV By Jill Kriesky, PhD TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . 5 Part I: Substance Use Disorders at the National, State, and Local Levels . 7 The “Lay of the Land” Nationally . 7 Why Is West Virginia Central to the Drug Epidemic Story? . 10 Why Focus on Kanawha County? . 11 Part II: Calculations of Damages from Substance Use Disorders in West Virginia and Kanawha County . 14 Calculating the Economic Damages of Fatal Overdoses . 14 Calculating the Economic Costs of Non-Fatal Substance Use . 15 Total Economic Damages in West Virginia and Kanawha County . 15 Part III: Additional Health and Social Impacts, Additional Costs . 17 Why We Look Beyond the Current Estimations . 17 The Children of People with SUDs . 18 Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) . 18 Learning Disabilities . 19 Foster Care . 19 Long-Term Health Considerations of People with SUDs . 20 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) . 21 Hepatitis C (HCV) . 22 Hepatitis B (HBV) . 23 Infective Endocarditis (IE) . 24 Part IV: Harm Reduction: How to Reduce Drug Epidemic Costs . 26 Dollars Saved by Lives Saved through Harm Reduction . 27 Naloxone Distribution . 27 Syringe Services Programs (SSPs) . 28 Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) . 29 Supervised Consumption Facilities (SCFs) . 30 Dollars Saved by Reductions in Crime and Other Societal Impacts . 31 Part V: Recommendations . 33 Better Data Tracking and Distribution . 33 Wide Distribution of Harm Reduction Programs . 34 Policies to Enhance Residents’ Health and Well-Being . .. 34 Appendix . 36 Acknowledgements .
    [Show full text]
  • Doelger Building 320–326 Judah Street
    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Doelger Building 320–326 Judah Street Landmark No. Initiated by the Historic Preservation Commission, September 19, 2012 Approved by the Board of Supervisors, March 26, 2013 Signed by Mayor Edwin Lee, April 2, 2013 265 Effective Date: May 10, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS page OVERVIEW 1 CONSTRUCTION HISTORY 2 BUILDING DESCRIPTION 6 ART DECO 19 STREAMLINE MODERNE 20 HENRY DOELGER BUILDER INC. 22 320 Judah + Expanding Firm 23 Henry Ford of Housing 24 FHA Mortgages + Racial Restrictions 27 Doelger Built Homes 28 Marketing, Advertising, and Model Homes 31 Westlake 34 HENRY DOELGER 36 ARTICLE 10 LANDMARK DESIGNATION 38 Significance 38 Integrity 39 Boundary 41 Character-Defining Features 41 Property Information 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 45 The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is a seven-member body that makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors regarding the designation of landmark buildings and districts. The regulations governing landmarks and landmark districts are found in Article 10 of the Planning Code. The HPC is staffed by the San Francisco Planning Department. Only language contained within the Article 10 designation ordinance, adopted by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, should be regarded as final. The Doelger Building 320 – 326 Judah Street Built: 1932 / 1940 Architect: Charles O. Clausen / Henry Doelger Builder Inc. OVERVIEW 320–326 Judah Street, located between Eighth and Ninth Avenue in the Sunset District, served as the headquarters, warehouse and sales office of prolific San Francisco builder Henry Doelger. Constructed in 1932 in a bold Art Deco design, the Doelger Building was one of the neighborhood’s first Modern buildings and functioned as Doelger’s base of operations for nearly two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Gfors Dutch National Report
    G-fors Dutch national report Strategic Environmental Assessment Particulate matter Frans Coenen Bas Denters Pieter-Jan Klok Julia Kotzebue University of Twente 2008 Part 1: The Dutch SEA case Frans Coenen Julia Kotzebue Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy University of Twente The Netherlands Content 0 Strategic Environmental Assessments in the Netherlands 1 1 Context and Conditions 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Case History 5 2 The Action Arena 12 2.1 Involved Actors: Holders – their resources and Roles 12 2.2 Absent Actors 20 2.3 Observed Modes of Interaction 20 2.4 Discourses 21 3 Identifying Case Specific Governance Arrangements 22 3.1 Governance Modes/Governance Arrangements 22 3.2 Rules in Use/Institutional Content 24 3.3 Changes 25 4 Identification of the Case Specific Knowledge Scapes 25 4.1 Dominant Knowledge Forms: Content/Claims of Knowledge Forms 25 4.2 Knowledge Holders 28 4.3 Excluded/Silent Knowledge 29 4.4 Relevance of Reflective Knowledge 30 5 Identification of Interfaces/Interaction between Knowledge and Governance Arrangements 31 5.1 Synergies/Contradictions between Governance Arrangements and Knowledge Forms 32 5.2 Relationship between Modes of Interaction and Knowledge Forms 33 5.3 Relationship between Governance Arrangements, Knowledge Forms and Learning processes 33 6 Identifying ‘Governance for Sustainability’ 33 6.1 Assessing Sustainable Development in the Selected Case 33 6.2 Assessing the Legitimacy of Policy-making in the Selected Case 34 6.3 Synergies/Contradictions between Governance Arrangements and Knowledge Forms on the one side and Sustainability and Legitimate Policy-Making on the other side 35 References 36 Attachment 38 0.
    [Show full text]