DOCSLIB.ORG

EXPERIMENTS on SYNTHESIS of SUPERHEAVY ELEMENTS USING 48Ca BEAM at FLNR JINR

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EXPERIMENTS on SYNTHESIS of SUPERHEAVY ELEMENTS USING 48Ca BEAM at FLNR JINR UZ9901138 EXPERIMENTS ON SYNTHESIS OF SUPERHEAVY ELEMENTS USING 48Ca BEAM AT FLNR JINR Yu.Ts.Oganessian, A.V.Yeremin Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna, Russia According to macro-microscopic nuclear theory the stability of heavy nuclides, under- going mainly a-decay and spontaneous fission, is determined by the structural properties of nuclear matter. Their binding energy and lifetime increase most prominently in the vicinity of closed shells, corresponding to the spherical nuclear shape in the ground state. Following the well-known shells with Z = 82 and N = 126 in the stable spherical nucleus 208Pb, the next closed neutron shell is expected at N=184. Calculations by R.Smolanczuk et al. [1,2] who successfully reproduced the decay properties of the known most neutron-rich heavy nuclei, and P.Moller et al. [3] have shown that the stabilising effect of the spherical shell starts already at N > 168 for a broad region of isotopes with Z = 104 - 120. Such neutron-rich nuclei can be synthesised, as we have shown earlier (see for e.g. [4]), in fusion reactions using the heaviest isotopes of U, Pu and Cm as targets and a 48Ca ion beam. As a result of the significant mass excess of the doubly magic 48Ca nucleus, the excitation energy of the compound nucleus at the Coulomb barrier only amounts to about 30 MeV. The deexcitation of this nucleus should proceed by the emission of 3 neutrons and y-rays [5]. This circumstance should increase the survival probability of the evaporation residues (ER) as compared with the case of "hot" fusion reactions (Ex > 50 MeV), which were used for the synthesis of heavy isotopes of elements with atomic numbers Z=IO6, 108 and 110 [6]. On the other hand, the high asymmetry of the interacting nuclei in the entrance channel (AiJAr = 0.2; Zp- Zj= 1880) should decrease possible dynamical limitations on the fusion of massive nuclei as compared with more symmetrical cold fusion reactions [7]. To produce heavy isotopes of element 112 in the reaction 48Ca + 238U, two experiments at beam energies 231 MeV (E* = 31 MeV) and 238 MeV (E* = 39 MeV) were performed. In the first experiment, in a 25 - day irradiation of a 238U target with a beam dose of 3.5 x 1018 at the focal plane of the recoil separator VASSILISSA [8] two spontaneous fission events were detected. The most probable explanation of the data obtained in this experiment is that spontaneous fission is caused just by the decay of an even - odd isotope (N = 171) of element 112 produced in the reaction 238U(48Ca,3n)283112 with a cross section of about 5 pb [9]. The half-life of the new nuclide is 180 sec. In the second experiment the beam energy was 238 MeV (E* = 39 MeV). The total beam dose in that case was 2.2 x 1018. No events were detected. The only so far known isotope of element 112, 277112, was synthesised in the "cold" fusion reaction [10]. This isotope is an a. emitter with a half-life Tm = 0.24 ms. The obtained experimental data show that with an increase in the neutron number by 6 units, the half-life of element 112 increases by more than of 5 orders of magnitude. This is proof of existence of long-lived superheavy elements predicted theoretically in the region of the neutron shell N = 54 184. The production cross-section for element 112 is higher (5.0 pb) when using the "hot" fusion reaction and a 48Ca beam than the value obtained by using the "cold" fusion reaction and a70Zn beam (1.0 pb) [10]. The reaction 48Ca + 242Pu was investigated with the aim to synthesise a new isotope of the heaviest element Z = 114 [11]. The experiment was performed at beam energy resulting in excitation energy of the compound nucleus of 33.5 MeV. For the collected beam dose of 7.5xl018, we observed two decay chains both consisting of an implanted heavy nucleus, a subsequent a-decay and a spontaneous fission (SF). For the first sequence the measured a particle energy and the corresponding time interval were: Ea =10.29 ± 0.02 MeV and At = 1.32s; for the spontaneous fission At = 559.6 s. For the second sequence a signal was registered from an a particle, which had escaped the detector, AEa = 2.31 MeV, At = 14.45 s; for the spontaneous fission At = 228.6 s. The decay chains originated from the a-decay of the new isotope Z = 114 with mass number 287 and was terminated by the SF of the previously investigated isotope 112. The new nuclide 114 was produced in the fusion reaction in the 3n-evaporation channel with a cross section of about 2.5 pb. The observed radioactive properties of the synthesised nuclei 287114 together with the data obtained earlier for the isotope 114 and the products of its a decay, viz the isotopes ' 112, may be considered as a direct proof of the existence of the "island of stability" of superheavy elements predicted by theory more than 30 years ago. This work has been performed with a support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research under grant N 99-02-17447 and the INT AS grant N 96-662. 1. Smolanczuk, J, Skalski, and A. Sobiczewski, In Proceedings of the International Workshop XXIV on Gross Properties of Nuclei and Nuclear Excitations "Extremes of Nuclear Structure", Hirschegg, 1996 GSI, Darmstadt, 1996), p. 35. 2. Smolanczuk, Phys. Rev. C56, 812 (1997). 3. Moller, J.R. Nix, and K.-L. Kratz, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 66, 131 (1997). 4. Yu.Ts. Oganessian, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics at the Turn of the Millennium "Structure of Vacuum and Elementary Matter", Wilderness, 1996 World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 11. 5. Pustylnik, In Proceedings of the VI International School-Seminar "Heavy Ion Physics", Dubna, 1997 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), p. 431; 6. Yu.A. Lazarev et. al., Phys. Rev. C54, 620 (1996). 7. Blocki et.al., Nucl. Phys. A459, 145 (1986). 8. Yeremin et. al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A350, 608 (1994). 9. Yu.Ts. Oganessian et. al., Eur. Phys. J. A5, 63 (1999). 10. Hofmann et. al., Z. Phys. A354 (1996) 229. 11. Yu.Ts. Oganessian et. al., Preprint JINR E7-99-111, Dubna 1999. To be published in Nature (1999). 55.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Binding Blocks: Building the Universe One Nucleus at the Time
    Binding Blocks: building the Universe one nucleus at the time C. Aa. Diget, A. Pastore, K. Leech, T. Haylett , S. Lock, T. Sanders, M. Shelley, H. V. Willett, Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York, Y010 5DD, United Kingdom J. Keegans, E.A. Milne Centre for Astrophysics School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom L. Sinclair, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom E. C. Simpson, Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia and the Binding Blocks collaboration #JOEJOH #JOEJOH #JOEJOH #MPDLT #MPDLT #MPDLT #VJMEJOHUIF6OJWFSTF #VJMEJOHUIF6OJWFSTF #VJMEJOHUIF6OJWFSTF E-mail: [email protected] POFOVDMFVTBUBUJNF POFOVDMFVTBUBUJNF POFOVDMFVTBUBUJNF Abstract. We present a new teaching and outreach activity based around the construction of a three-dimensional chart of isotopes using LEGOr bricksz. The activity, Binding Blocks, demonstrates nuclear and astrophysical processes through a seven-meter chart of all nuclear isotopes, built from over 26,000 LEGOr bricks. It integrates A-level and GCSE curricula across areas of nuclear physics, astrophysics, arXiv:1610.02296v2 [physics.ed-ph] 18 Oct 2016 and chemistry, including: nuclear decays (through the colours in the chart); nuclear binding energy (through tower heights); production of chemical elements in the cosmos; fusion processes in stars and fusion energy on Earth; as well as links to medical physics, particularly diagnostics and radiotherapy. z LEGOr is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorise or endorse the present work. Binding Blocks: building the Universe one nucleus at the time 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IUPAC/IUPAP Provisional Report)
    Pure Appl. Chem. 2018; 90(11): 1773–1832 Provisional Report Sigurd Hofmanna,*, Sergey N. Dmitrieva, Claes Fahlanderb, Jacklyn M. Gatesb, James B. Robertoa and Hideyuki Sakaib On the discovery of new elements (IUPAC/IUPAP Provisional Report) Provisional Report of the 2017 Joint Working Group of IUPAC and IUPAP https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0918 Received August 24, 2018; accepted September 24, 2018 Abstract: Almost thirty years ago the criteria that are currently used to verify claims for the discovery of a new element were set down by the comprehensive work of a Transfermium Working Group, TWG, jointly established by IUPAC and IUPAP. The recent completion of the naming of the 118 elements in the first seven periods of the Periodic Table of the Elements was considered as an opportunity for a review of these criteria in the light of the experimental and theoretical advances in the field. In late 2016 the Unions decided to estab- lish a new Joint Working Group, JWG, consisting of six members determined by the Unions. A first meeting of the JWG was in May 2017. One year later this report was finished. In a first part the works and conclusions of the TWG and the Joint Working Parties, JWP, deciding on the discovery of the now named elements are summarized. Possible experimental developments for production and identification of new elements beyond the presently known ones are estimated. Criteria and guidelines for establishing priority of discovery of these potential new elements are presented. Special emphasis is given to a description for the application of the criteria and the limits for their applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Binding Energy 1 Binding Energy
    Binding energy 1 Binding energy Binding energy is the mechanical energy required to disassemble a whole into separate parts. A bound system typically has a lower potential energy than its constituent parts; this is what keeps the system together—often this means that energy is released upon the creation of a bound state. The definition above corresponds to a positive binding energy (this is often causing confusion, e.g. a prominent term in chemistry is the 'free energy of binding', which is the difference of bound and unbound state and thus negative). General idea In general, binding energy represents the mechanical work which must be done against the forces which hold an object together, disassembling the object into component parts separated by sufficient distance that further separation requires negligible additional work. At the atomic level the atomic binding energy of the atom derives from electromagnetic interaction and is the energy required to disassemble an atom into free electrons and a nucleus. Electron binding energy is a measure of the energy required to free electrons from their atomic orbits. This is more commonly known as ionization energy.[1] At the nuclear level, binding energy is also equal to the energy liberated when a nucleus is created from other nucleons or nuclei.[2][3] This nuclear binding energy (binding energy of nucleons into a nuclide) is derived from the nuclear force (residual strong interaction) and is the energy required to disassemble a nucleus into the same number of free, unbound neutrons and protons it is composed of, so that the nucleons are far/distant enough from each other so that the nuclear force can no longer cause the particles to interact.[4] In astrophysics, gravitational binding energy of a celestial body is the energy required to expand the material to infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Mass and Stability
    CHAPTER 3 Nuclear Mass and Stability Contents 3.1. Patterns of nuclear stability 41 3.2. Neutron to proton ratio 43 3.3. Mass defect 45 3.4. Binding energy 47 3.5. Nuclear radius 48 3.6. Semiempirical mass equation 50 3.7. Valley of $-stability 51 3.8. The missing elements: 43Tc and 61Pm 53 3.8.1. Promethium 53 3.8.2. Technetium 54 3.9. Other modes of instability 56 3.10. Exercises 56 3.11. Literature 57 3.1. Patterns of nuclear stability There are approximately 275 different nuclei which have shown no evidence of radioactive decay and, hence, are said to be stable with respect to radioactive decay. When these nuclei are compared for their constituent nucleons, we find that approximately 60% of them have both an even number of protons and an even number of neutrons (even-even nuclei). The remaining 40% are about equally divided between those that have an even number of protons and an odd number of neutrons (even-odd nuclei) and those with an odd number of protons and an even number of neutrons (odd-even nuclei). There are only 5 stable nuclei known which have both 2 6 10 14 an odd number of protons and odd number of neutrons (odd-odd nuclei); 1H, 3Li, 5B, 7N, and 50 23V. It is significant that the first stable odd-odd nuclei are abundant in the very light elements 2 (the low abundance of 1H has a special explanation, see Ch. 17). The last nuclide is found in low isotopic abundance (0.25%) and we cannot be certain that this nuclide is not unstable to radioactive decay with extremely long half-life.
    [Show full text]
  • BETA DECAY in Β-Decay Processes, the Mass Number a Is Constant, but the Proton and Neutron Numbers Change As the Parent Decays
    BETA DECAY In β-decay processes, the mass number A is constant, but the proton and neutron numbers change as the parent decays to a daughter that is better bound with lower mass. In β− decay, a neutron transforms into a proton, and an electron is emitted to conserve charge. Overall, Z Z +1.Inβ+ decay, a proton transforms into a neutron, an electron is emitted! and Z Z 1. In a third process, called electron capture or EC decay, the nucleus! − swallows an atomic electron, most likely from the atomic 1s state, and a proton converts to a neutron. The overall the e↵ect on the radioactive nucleus is the same in β+ decay. The electrons (or positrons) emitted in the first two types of β decay have continuous kinetic energies, up to an endpoint which depends on the particular species decaying, but is usually of the order of 1 MeV. The electrons (or positrons) cannot pre-exist inside the nucleus. A simple uncertainty estimate suggests that if they did, the endpoint would be much higher in energy: If it did pre-exist, then the electron would be somewhere in the nucleus beforehand, with an uncertainty in position equal to the size of the nucleus, 1/3 ∆x r0A 5 fm, in a medium mass nucleus. ⇠ ⇠ ¯h 197 MeV.fm/c The uncertainty in momentum is then ∆p = ∆x = 5 fm =40MeV/c. So the smallest momentum that the endpoint could be would correspond to 40 MeV/c. The corresponding smallest endpoint energy would be: E2 = c2p2 + m2c4 c2p2 =40MeV.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Binding Energy 1 Nuclear Binding Energy
    Nuclear binding energy 1 Nuclear binding energy Nuclear binding energy is the energy required to split a nucleus of an atom into its component parts. The component parts are neutrons and protons, which are collectively called nucleons. The binding energy of nuclei is always a positive number, since all nuclei require net energy to separate them into individual protons and neutrons. Thus, the mass of an atom's nucleus is always less than the sum of the individual masses of the constituent protons and neutrons when separated. This notable difference is a measure of the nuclear binding energy, which is a result of forces that hold the nucleus together. Because these forces result in the removal of energy when the nucleus is formed, and this energy has mass, mass is removed from the total mass of the original particles, and the mass is missing in the resulting nucleus. This missing mass is known as the mass defect, and represents the energy released when the nucleus is formed. Nuclear binding energy can also apply to situations when the nucleus splits into fragments composed of more than one nucleon, and in this case the binding energies for the fragments (as compared to the whole) may be either positive or negative, depending on where the parent nucleus and the daughter fragments fall on the nuclear binding energy curve (see below). If new binding energy is available when light nuclei fuse, or when heavy nuclei split, either of these processes result releases the binding energy. This energy—available as nuclear energy—can be used to produce nuclear power or build nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Search for Superheavy Elements
    THE HENRYK NIEWODNICZAŃSKI INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES UL. RADZIKOWSKIEGO, 31-342 KRAKÓW, POLAND WWW.IFJ.EDU.PL/PUBL/REPORTS/2008/ KRAKÓW, DECEMBER 2008 REPORT No. 2019/PL Experimental search for superheavy elements Andrzej Wieloch* Habilitation thesis (prepared in March 2008) *M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University. Reymonta 4. 30-059 Kraków, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This work reports on the experimental search for superheavy elements (SHE). Two types of approaches for SHE production are studied i.e.: "cold" fusion mech­ anism and massive transfer mechanism. First mechanism was studied, in normal and inverse kinematics, by using Wien filter at the GANIL facility. The production of elements with Z=106 and 108 is reported while negative result on the synthesis of SHE elements with Z=114 and 118 was received. The other approach i.e. re­ actions induced by heavy ion projectiles (e.g.:172Yb. 197Au) on fissile target nuclei (e.g.: 2S8U., 2S2Th) at near Coulomb barrier incident energies was studied by using superconducting solenoid installed in Texas A&M University. Preliminary results for the reaction 197 Au(7.5MeV/u) -f 232Th are presented where three cases of the possible candidates for SHE elements were found. A dedicated detection setup for such studies is discussed and the detailed data analysis is presented. Detection of al­ pha and spontaneous fission radioactive decays is used to unambiguously identify the atomic number of SHE. Special statistical analysis for a very low detected number of a decays is applied to check consistency of the a radioactive chains.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Mass Excesses and Binding Energies the Periodic Chart of Elements Is a Useful Graphical Presentation of the Elements of Nature
    1. Mass Excesses and Binding Energies The Periodic chart of Elements is a useful graphical presentation of the elements of nature. The elements are identified via the number of electrons in the neutral atom. (Z) which corresponds to the element name (e.g. Hydrogen [H] has Z = 1, Helium [He] has Z = 2 and Iron [Fe] has Z = 26). The atoms of an element consist of Z- electrons orbiting a nucleus with charge +Z. The nucleus is made of protons and neutrons. Since neutrons have no charge and protons +1 charge, there are Z-protons. A single element can have more than one isotope; when the number of protons is fixed, but the number of neutrons varies from isotope to isotope. The natural abundance of the element hydrogen is dominated by the isotope 1H, with smaller quantities of heavy hydrogen (or deuterium) 2H. The number in this notation is the associated mass number, it is the sum of the number of protons and neutrons. The element hydrogen has 1 proton, thus 1H has 0 neutrons and 2H has 1 neutron. One can see that the Periodic chart of Elements is not adequate to graphically show this richness of nuclei, thus we create what is known as a chart of nuclides, a graphical representation of nuclei. The chart is organized with the number of neutrons (N) situated on the horizontal axis and the number of protons (Z) on the vertical axis. Please visit the National Nuclear Data Center’s chart of nuclides to get familiar with the chart (http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/).
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 112: the Physics of Stars Class 7 Notes: Basics of Nuclear
    Astronomy 112: The Physics of Stars Class 7 Notes: Basics of Nuclear Fusion In this class we continue the process of filling in the missing microphysical details that we need to make a stellar model. To recap, in the last two classes we computed the pressure of stellar material and the rate of energy transport through the star. These were two of the missing pieces we needed. The third, which we’ll sketch out over the next two lectures, is the rate for nuclear reactions, and the energy that they generate. I. Energetics A. Energy Release All nuclear reactions fundamentally work by converting mass into energy. (In some ways the same could be said of chemical reactions, but for those the masses involved are so tiny as to not be worth worrying about.) The masses of the reactants involved therefore determine the energy released by the reaction. Consider a reaction between two species that produced some other species I(Ai, Zi) + J (Aj, Zj) → K(Ak, Zk) + L(Al, Zl), where as usual Z is the atomic number and A is the atomic mass number. At this point we must distinguish between atomic mass number and actual mass, so let M be the mass of a given species. The atomic mass number times mH and the true mass are nearly identical, M ≈ AmH, but not quite, and that small difference is the source of energy for the reaction. For the reaction we have written down, the energy released is 2 Qijk = (Mi + Mj − Mk − Ml)c , i.e. the initial mass minus the final mass, multiplied by c2.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Stable Superheavy Nuclei in the Island of Stability
    Most stable superheavy nuclei in the island of stability H.C.Manjunatha1, L.Seenappa1, K.N.Sridhar2 1Department of Physics, Government College for Women, Kolar-563101 Karnataka, INDIA 2Department of Physics, Government First Grade College, Kolar-563101 Karnataka, INDIA [email protected] Abstract We have investigated most stable superheavy nuclei by studying the decay properties such as alpha decay, cluster decay and spontaneous fission. We have investigated nine stable nuclei in the island of stability which can be detected through fission are 318123(10.5ms), 319123(4.68μs), 317124(1.74×104 y), 318124(2.70×101 y), 319124(2.83×10-2 y), 320124(1.91×10-5 y), 319125(2.46×109 y), 320125(3.81×106 y) and 321125(3.99×103 y). Present work also investigates three stable superheavy nuclei which can be detected through alpha decay which are 318125(1.03×1012 y), 319126(5.77×1011 y) and 320126(3.99×1010 y). These nuclei will become most stable nuclei if they synthesized in the laboratory. The identified twelve stable nuclei is the evidence for the hypothesis of island of stability. I.Introduction The unanswered questions in the field of Nuclear Physics are; what is the heaviest superheavy nuclei that can exist? and do very long-lived superheavy nuclei exist in the nature?. The past ten years have been marked by remarkable progress in the science of superheavy elements and nuclei. The island of stability was predicted theoretically more than 40 years ago. The lifetimes of most known superheavy nuclei are governed by the competition between α -decay and spontaneous fission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mass of a Nucleus
    The mass of a nucleus • Energy generation in stars • which nuclei are stable • which nuclei exist in principle 1 SOHO, 171A Fe emission line Nucleons Mass Spin Charge size: ~1 fm Proton 938.272 MeV/c2 1/2 +1e Neutron 939.565 MeV/c2 1/2 0 Nuclei nucleons attract each other via the strong force ( range ~ 1 fm) a bunch of nucleons bound together create a potential for an additional : neutron proton (or any other charged particle) V V l Coulomb Barrier V 1/3 l c a a i R ~ 1.3 x A fm 2 i t t n Z1 Z 2 e n e e t V = t c o R o R P P … R … r r Nucleons in a Box: Discrete energy levels in nucleus Æ Nucleons are bound by attractive force. Therefore, mass of nucleus is smaller than the total mass of the nucleons by the binding energy dm=B/c2 2 Nuclear Masses and Binding Energy Energy that is released when a nucleus is assembled from neutrons and protons 2 m Z N(,)= Zmp +n Nm −/ B c mp = proton mass, mn = neutron mass, m(Z,N) = mass of nucleus with Z,N 0 > •B • With B the mass of the nucleus is determined. • B is very roughly ~A Masses are usually tabulated as atomic masses m = mnuc + Z me - Be Nuclear Mass Electron Mass Electron Binding Energy ~ 1 GeV/A 511 keV/Z 13.6 eV (H) to 116 keV (K-shell U) / Z 2 Most tables give atomic mass excess Δ in MeV:m= Amu +/ Δ c (so for 12C: Δ=0) (see nuclear wallet cards for a table) 3 Q-value Energy released in a nuclear reaction (>0 if energy is released, 0 if energy is use<d Example: The sun is powered by the fusion of hydrogen into helium: 4 + 4p Æ He + 2 e + 2νe Mass difference dM released as eneryg dE = dM c2 2 (using nuclear masses !) Q/ c=nuc 4 m p − nuc4 m 2m − He e 2 −ν m 4 In practice one often uses mass excess Δ and atomic masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercises with Mass, Binding Energy and the Liquid Drop Model – Suggested Solutions
    Exercises with Mass, Binding Energy and the Liquid Drop Model – Suggested Solutions 1) For this exercise the mass excess is used. The needed values are: n: 8.0713171 MeV. 1H: 7.28897050 MeV. 4He: 2.42491656 MeV. 56Fe: -60.6054 MeV. 142Ce: -84.583 MeV. 238U: 47.3089 MeV. Mass excess is given by ΔM(Z,A) = M(Z,A)-A. The masses can therefore be found with M(Z,A) =ΔM (Z,A ) + A by using 1 u = 931.5 MeV we get: M(n) = 1.008665 u M(1H) = 1.007825 u M(4He) = 4.002603 u M(56Fe) = 55.934938 u M(142Ce) = 141.909197 u M(238U) = 238.050788 u 1. Calculate the mass of the following nuclei: n, 1H, 56Fe, 142Ce and 238U The most stable nuclei is 56Fe. It has the highest binding energy compared to the number of nucleons. 2. Which of these nuclei are the most stable? 1.00 kg 2H is 496.5 moles by fusion 248.2 mole 4He is created which is 993.6 g. The difference in mass is equal to the energy 1000 - 993.6 g = 6.36 g. The energy is then 5.7×1014 J, 3.56×1027 MeV or 1.59108 kWh. 3. Assume that 1.00 kg 2H fuse to give pure 4He. What is the change in mass and what is the amount of energy produced (MeV and kWh)? 1.00 kg 233U fission to 92Rb, 138Cs and three neutrons. The mass difference is 0.785 g. Which gives 7.1×1013 J, 4.40×1026 MeV or 1.96×107 kWh.
    [Show full text]