Michael Hancher
[email protected] 7 January 2021 Duplicate Books, Facsimiles, and Weeds: A Bibliography with Excerpts, for Scholars and Librarians “Problem is, that we don’t know what is junk and what is not.”—Vartan Gregorian At least from the founding of the British Museum in 1754 until the present day, librarians have been burdened with a lot of books—too many, it has seemed, given limits to funds and storage capacity. From early on they or their employers have sought, and found, reasons for getting rid of these burdens: as being mere duplicates; as being obsolete in content; as useless for any imagined reader; as unfit for use because of poor condition; as about to turn to dust; as conveniently superseded by digital facsimiles; as too expensive to preserve outside the imagined shared custody of a few remnant copies. None of these more or less creditable excuses takes into account the critical value for historical scholarship of access to many different copies of material books, which the MLA asserted in its “Statement on the Significance of Primary Records” (1995; excerpted in the bibliography below). In his provocative treatise Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value (1979, 2017), Michael Thompson, taking a long view of the life span of cultural objects, proposes that all such things occupy a continuum that ranges from objects that are consumed quickly, such as foodstuffs, through objects of impending obsolescence, such as cars and dishwashers, through objects of human-scale durability, such as books and houses, to objects of extreme durability (durable both as material objects and as socially valued objects), such as diamonds.