Novartis -20-F- 2008
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Future of Digital Transformation and Innovation Unconference
The Future of Digital Transformation and Innovation unConference 6 October 2016 USERNAME: PASSWORD: Practical Solutions Your Business for the 4th Industrial Revolution Brussels, Belgium, by The Conference Board Celebrating its 100 Year Anniversary! CONFIRMED SPEAKERS Brian Anderson Associate Program Director The Demand Institute ( jointly operated by The Conference Board and Nielsen ) Andrea Bonime-Blanc CEO GEC Risk Advisory Lindsey Canning Partner, Intellectual Property White & Case LLP London Bonnie Cheuk Director, Global Head of Digital, Knowledge & Social Collaboration Euroclear Kieran Conlon VP Sales & Services International Globoforce Martin Curley Former VP & Director Intel Labs Europe Intel Corporation David Dab Chief Innovation Officer ING Belgium Wim De Waele CEO Eggsplore John Higgins Director General Digital Europe Richard Hughes Director of Social Strategy BroadVision Joshua Jost Chief Storyteller Anderson Walsh Spencer Mark Leiter Chairman Leiter & Company Bertrand Liard Partner, Intellectual Property White & Case LLP Paris Jacquelyn MacLennan Partner, Competition White & Case LLP Brussels and London Ann Mettler Head of European Political Strategy Centre European Commission Dragan Pendic Head of Digital & Data Trust RelianceACSN Wil Schoenmakers Management Group PA Consulting Philippe Trichet Digital Expert Director Boston Consulting Group Nicolas van Zeebroeck Innovation and Digital Business Solvay Brussels School Philip Weiss Author of “Hyperthinking”, Founder ZN Sponsors WHY? WHO? Digital is set to revolutionize the The unConference is designed for 400+ C-suite and senior level executives, world. Is your company set for this? leading different functions in large organizations and different industries. Businesses have always changed—in reaction to changes in the marketplace WHAT? or in capabilities. But digital The event will be an integrated blend of transformation presents a new 1. -
Novartis / Chiron Regulation (Ec)
EN Case No COMP/M.4049 - NOVARTIS / CHIRON Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/02/2006 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4049 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 06-02-2006 SG-Greffe (2006) D/200529 In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and PUBLIC VERSION other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a MERGER PROCEDURE general description. ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying party Dear Madam/Sir, Subject: Case No. COMP/M.4049 – Novartis / Chiron Notification of 23/12/2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/20041 (“Merger Regulation”) 1. On 23/12/2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Novartis AG (“Novartis”, Switzerland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Chiron Corporation (“Chiron”, United States) by way of purchase of shares. 2. After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation constitutes a concentration that falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the EEA Agreement. -
Truvada (Emtricitabine / Tenofovir Disoproxil)
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (2.3) HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Recommended dose in HIV-1 uninfected adults: One tablet TRUVADA safely and effectively. See full prescribing information (containing 200 mg/300 mg of emtricitabine and tenofovir for TRUVADA. disoproxil fumarate) once daily taken orally with or without food. (2.3) TRUVADA® (emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) tablets, for oral use Recommended dose in renally impaired HIV-uninfected Initial U.S. Approval: 2004 individuals: Do not use TRUVADA in HIV-uninfected individuals if CrCl is below 60 mL/min. If a decrease in CrCl is observed in WARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS/SEVERE HEPATOMEGALY WITH uninfected individuals while using TRUVADA for PrEP, evaluate STEATOSIS, POST-TREATMENT ACUTE EXACERBATION OF potential causes and re-assess potential risks and benefits of HEPATITIS B, and RISK OF DRUG RESISTANCE WITH USE OF continued use. (2.4) TRUVADA FOR PrEP IN UNDIAGNOSED HIV-1 INFECTION -----------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS------------------- See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Tablets: 200 mg/300 mg, 167 mg/250 mg, 133 mg/200 mg, and 100 Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, mg/150 mg of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate . (3) including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogs, including VIREAD, a component of TRUVADA. (5.1) --------------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS----------------------------- TRUVADA is not approved for the treatment of chronic Do not use TRUVADA for pre-exposure prophylaxis in individuals with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Severe acute unknown or positive HIV-1 status. TRUVADA should be used in exacerbations of hepatitis B have been reported in patients HIV-infected patients only in combination with other antiretroviral coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV who have discontinued agents. -
Julius Baer Multicooperation Annual Report 2005 As at June 30, 2005 (Audited)
Julius Baer Multicooperation Annual Report 2005 as at June 30, 2005 (audited) Subscriptions are only valid if made on the basis of the current Prospectus, the latest Annual Report and the latest Semi-Annual Report if published thereafter. The Articles of Association, the valid Prospectus and the Annual and Semi-Annual Reports may be obtained free of charge at the representative in Switzerland and the respective paying agent. Only the German version of the present Annual Report has been reviewed by the independent auditor. Consequently, the independent auditor's report only refers to the German version of the Report; other versions result from a conscientious translation made under the responsibility of the Board. In case of differences between the German version and the translation, the German version shall be the authentic text. AN INVESTMENT FUND DOMICILED IN LUXEMBOURG Representative in Switzerland: Julius Baer Investment Funds Services Ltd., Zurich Paying agent in Switzerland: Bank Julius Bär & Co. AG, Bahnhofstrasse 36, Postfach, CH - 8010 Zurich Paying agent in Germany: Bank Julius Bär (Deutschland) AG, Messe Turm, Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49, Postfach 15 01 52, D - 60061 Frankfurt on the Main Paying agent in Austria: Erste Bank der oesterreichischen Sparkassen AG, Graben 21, A - 1010 Vienna Contents Page Organisation and Management 4 Independent Auditor's Report 5 Notes to the Financial Statements 6 Julius Baer Multicooperation (Umbrella Fund) MCOO Julius Baer Multicooperation - Emerging Markets Value Stock Fund HESF Julius Baer Multicooperation -
Documenting the Biotechnology Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area
UC San Diego Reports and Studies Title Documenting the Biotechnology Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1m24k447 Author Chandler, Robin L. Publication Date 1997 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Documenting the Biotechnology Industry In the San Francisco Bay Area Robin L. Chandler Head, Archives and Special Collections UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management 1997 1 Table of Contents Project Goals……………………………………………………………………….p. 3 Participants Interviewed………………………………………………………….p. 4 I. Documenting Biotechnology in the San Francisco Bay Area……………..p. 5 The Emergence of An Industry Developments at the University of California since the mid-1970s Developments in Biotech Companies since mid-1970s Collaborations between Universities and Biotech Companies University Training Programs Preparing Students for Careers in the Biotechnology Industry II. Appraisal Guidelines for Records Generated by Scientists in the University and the Biotechnology Industry………………………. p. 33 Why Preserve the Records of Biotechnology? Research Records to Preserve Records Management at the University of California Records Keeping at Biotech Companies III. Collecting and Preserving Records in Biotechnology…………………….p. 48 Potential Users of Biotechnology Archives Approaches to Documenting the Field of Biotechnology Project Recommendations 2 Project Goals The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Library & Center for Knowledge Management and the Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) are collaborating in a year-long project beginning in December 1996 to document the impact of biotechnology in the Bay Area. The collaborative effort is focused upon the development of an archival collecting model for the field of biotechnology to acquire original papers, manuscripts and records from selected individuals, organizations and corporations as well as coordinating with the effort to capture oral history interviews with many biotechnology pioneers. -
Which Drugs Are Most Effective for Recurrent Herpes Labialis?
Evidence-based answers from the clinical inquiries Family Physicians Inquiries Network Eiko Tubridy, MD; Gary Kelsberg, MD Valley Family Residency Which drugs are most Program, Renton, Wash Leilani St Anna, MLIS, effective for recurrent AHIP University of Washington Health Sciences Libraries, herpes labialis? Seattle AssistanT EDITOR EvidEncE-basEd answEr Jon O. neher, MD Valley Family Residency daily oral acyclovir or vala- ing to the agent used: valacyclovir reduces Program, Renton, Wash A cyclovir may help prevent her- both healing time and duration of pain, pes simplex labialis (HSL) recurrences famciclovir reduces both in one dosage (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, form but not another, and acyclovir reduces meta-analysis of randomized controlled only pain duration (SOR: B, single RCTs). trials [RCTs] with heterogeneous results). Several topical medications (acyclovir, No trials compare oral or topical treat- penciclovir, docosanol) modestly decrease ments for HSL outbreaks against each oth- healing time and pain duration—typically er. Oral antivirals modestly reduce healing by less than a day—and require multiple time and duration of pain, varying accord- doses per day (SOR: B, multiple RCTs). Evidence summary The authors of the meta-analysis noted A systematic review and meta-analysis of the that although 9 studies favored the use of an effectiveness of oral and topical nucleoside antiviral drug, only 4 showed statistically sig- antiviral agents to prevent recurrent HSL in nificant differences when compared with pla- immunocompetent people found 11 RCTs cebo, and none of them had a low risk of bias. with a total of 1250 patients that compared They concluded that the review supported us- an active drug against placebo.1 The medi- ing oral acyclovir and valacyclovir to prevent cations were topical 5% acyclovir, topical 1% recurrent HSL.1 penciclovir, and oral acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir in various doses. -
Applications at Novartis Pharma AG Fieldbus
FuRIOS 2 Feldbus und Remote I/OSystemvergleich Fieldbus and Remote I/O System Comparison ”The Fieldbus is ready for practical use“ FuRIOS 2 Fieldbus and Remote I/O System Comparison Preface Prof. Dr.-Ing. Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Institute of Automation Technology/Process Informatics at Bergische University Wuppertal Preface to second, updated edition Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Lothar Litz Institute of Automation Technology Technical University Kaiserslautern FuRIOS: Fieldbus and Remote I/O – a system comparison Published in atp – Automatisierungstechnische Praxis 44 (2002), Edition 12/2002, pages 61 - 70 Dr.-Ing. Thomas Tauchnitz, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH Dipl.-Ing. Wilfried Schmieder, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH Dipl.-Ing. Sven Seintsch, Infraserv GmbH & Co Höchst KG Fieldbus and Remote I/O: System Comparison „FuRIOS“ Presentation at the NAMUR general assembly, 08.11.2002 Dr.-Ing. Thomas Tauchnitz, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH Fieldbus Experience Reports Presentation at the NAMUR general assembly, 04.11.2004 Martin Schwibach, BASF Thomas Meier-Künzig, DSM Sven Seintsch, infraserv höchst technik Dr. Joachim Zobel, Novartis Push-button telephones were the first step on the way to the mobile phone Interview mit Dr.-Ing. Thomas Tauchnitz, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH Manfred Dietz, Infraserv GmbH & Co Höchst KG Savings are not the goal of fieldbus Interview with Frans van Laak, Speaker of NAMUR working group 2.6 „Fieldbusses“ Harry van Rijt, DSM TechnoPartners From theorie to practical use Aventis applies FuRIOS study in real pharmaceutical -
Clarifying and Settling Access to Clearing and Settlement in the Eu
CLARIFYING AND SETTLING ACCESS TO CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT IN THE EU Working Paper www.ieje.net David Henry Research Fellow Institute for European Legal Studies, University of Liège, Belgium [email protected] Institut d’Etudes Juridiques Européennes, Bd. du Rectorat 3, Bat. B33 / Bte 9, B-1400 Liège, Tel +32 4 366 3130, Fax +32 4 366 3155 1 CLARIFYING AND SETTLING ACCESS TO CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT IN THE EU David Henry* I. Introduction As has been the case in network industries such as telecommunications,1 electricity,2 gas,3 and the postal sector,4 the European Union (hereinafter, the “EU”) financial services sector is slowly being prised open and feeling the effects of liberalisation.5 Indeed, a single market in financial services is seen as a fundamental requirement to achieving the, now diluted, goal of transforming the EU into the “most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in the world” by 2010. Though a single financial services market currently remains virtual, the launching of the Financial Services Action Plan (hereinafter the “FSAP”) in 1999 has brought considerable progress in this field.6 The FSAP lays down indicative priorities and a timetable for * Research Fellow at the Institute for European Legal Studies, University of Liège, Belgium. My sincerest thanks go to Mark Griffiths of Clifford Chance LLP and Nicolas Petit of the University of Liège for their helpful comments. 1 See, in particular, Directive 96/19 of 13 March 1996 amending Directive 90/388 with regard to the implementation of full competition in telecommunications markets, (1996) O.J. L 74/13. -
Financial Statements of Intercell AG As of December 31, 2010 According to UGB (Austrian GAAP)
Financial Statements of Intercell AG as of December 31, 2010 according to UGB (Austrian GAAP) Intercell . STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . MMX Intercell . STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . MMX 01 // *. // Table of Contents I Balance Sheet 2 II Income Statement 4 III Notes 5 1. General principles 5 2. Summary of accounting and valuation method principles 5 3. Details of the balance sheet and income statement 6 4. Other information 11 Movement in fixed assets 16 IV Management Report 18 1. Report on the operation activities 18 2. Financial Review 24 3. Risks 25 4. Reporting on the internal control and risk management system regarding financial reporting 27 5. Disclosure according to Section 243a of the Austrian Commercial Code 28 6. Operational and Strategic Outlook 29 7. Events after the Balance Sheet Date 30 V Auditor’s Report 31 VI Declaration by the Management Board 33 *. Imprint 34 Intercell . STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS . MMX 02 // I. // Balance Sheet December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009 A s s e t s EUR TEUR A. Fixed assets I. Intangible assets 1. Concessions, industrial property and similar rights and assets, and licenses in such rights and assets 19.029.092,52 3.793 2. Book value added by a merger 12.364.220,08 12.364 3. Prepayments 8.400,69 76 31.401.713,29 16.233 II. Tangible assets 1. Leasehold improvements 94.365,64 0 2. Machinery and equipment 1.880.222,07 1.915 3. Other equipments, factory and office equipment 357.854,84 380 2.332.442,55 2.295 III. Financial assets Shares in affiliated companies 4.954.970,54 130.117 38.689.126,38 148.645 B. -
Reference ID: 2998411
• New onset or worsening renal impairment: Can include acute HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION renal failure and Fanconi syndrome. Assess creatinine clearance These highlights do not include all the information needed to use (CrCl) before initiating treatment with COMPLERA. Monitor CrCl COMPLERA safely and effectively. See full prescribing and serum phosphorus in patients at risk. Avoid administering information for COMPLERA. COMPLERA with concurrent or recent use of nephrotoxic drugs. (5.3) COMPLERATM (emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil • Caution should be given to prescribing COMPLERA with drugs fumarate) tablets that may reduce the exposure of rilpivirine. (5.4) Initial U.S. Approval: 2011 • Caution should be given to prescribing COMPLERA with drugs with a known risk of Torsade de Pointes. (5.4) WARNINGS: LACTIC ACIDOSIS/SEVERE HEPATOMEGALY WITH STEATOSIS and POST TREATMENT ACUTE • Depressive disorders: Severe depressive disorders (depressed EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS B mood, depression, dysphoria, major depression, mood altered, negative thoughts, suicide attempt, suicidal ideation) have been See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. reported. Immediate medical evaluation is recommended for severe depressive disorders. (5.5) • Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of • Decreases in bone mineral density (BMD): Consider monitoring nucleoside analogs, including tenofovir disoproxil BMD in patients with a history of pathologic fracture -
Comparable Efficacy with Entecavir Monotherapy and Tenofovir
BMJ Open Gastroenterol: first published as 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000030 on 31 December 2015. Downloaded from Hepatology Comparable efficacy with entecavir monotherapy and tenofovir–entecavir combination in chronic hepatitis B patients Sumbella Baqai,1 James Proudfoot,2 Ronghui Xu,3,4 Steve Kane,5 Margaret Clark,6 Robert Gish,7,8,9,10,11 To cite: Baqai S, Proudfoot J, ABSTRACT et al Summary box Xu R, . Comparable Objectives: The long-term goal for chronic hepatitis B efficacy with entecavir patients is to maintain viral suppression in order to monotherapy and tenofovir– What is already known about this subject? reduce disease progression risk. Because patients with entecavir combination in ▸ Finding effective therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B patients. previous treatment failure may have multiple viral chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who BMJ Open Gastro 2015;2: resistance mutations, finding effective therapy is e000030. doi:10.1136/ challenging. Because recent studies have shown that have had previous treatment failure, many of bmjgast-2015-000030 the combination of entecavir and tenofovir is effective whom have multiple viral resistance mutations, in achieving virological response in many patients with is a challenge. prior treatment failure and multiple drug resistance ▸ Several recent studies have shown that combin- ation therapy with entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir Received 27 January 2015 mutations, we compared outcomes with this Revised 22 April 2015 combination versus monotherapy. (TDF) is effective in achieving virological by copyright. Accepted 30 April 2015 Methods: With a retrospective chart review we response in the majority of patients with prior compared results in 35 patients with previous treatment treatment failure and multiple drug resistance failure treated with the entecavir-tenofovir combination to mutations. -
Draft.Projectnotice to Street Nov 25 2019.V2
DR Market Announcement December 29, 2020 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 500 Stanton Christiana Rd. Newark, DE 19713-2107 To: FINRA Security Name: KONAMI HOLDINGS CORPORATION – Termination of Deposit Agreement JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of April 16, 2015 (the "Deposit Agreement") among KONAMI HOLDINGS CORPORATION (the "Company"), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary thereunder (the "Depositary"), and all Holders (defined therein) and Beneficial Owners (defined therein) from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder evidencing American depositary shares ("ADSs") hereby notifies registered holders of ADRs ("Holders") that the termination provisions of the Deposit Agreement have been amended and the Company has instructed the Depositary to terminate the Deposit Agreement (as amended) effective January 29, 2021. ADR Termination Date: January 29, 2021 Ratio: 1 ADS: 1 Share of Common Stock CUSIP: 50046R101 ADR ISIN: US50046R1014 Underlying ISIN: JP3300200007 Country of Incorporation: Japan Custodian: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Please be advised the ADR issuance books for the Company are closed with immediate effect. The ADS cancellation books will remain open until the earlier of (a) February 26, 2021, if prior to March 01, 2021 the Depositary establishes an unsponsored American depositary receipt program in respect of the Company’s shares; (b) March 30, 2021, if prior to March 01, 2021, the Depositary does not establish an unsponsored American