DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Conference Proceedings http://fordham.bepress.com/ftc/ PREFACE This Conference Proceedings book contains the written versions of most of the contributions presented during the Fifteenth International Facet Theory Conference. The Fifteenth International Facet Theory Conference took place at Fordham University, New York City, from August 16 to 19, 2015. The Conference provided a setting for presenting advances in Facet Theory, as a research paradigm and methodology for multivariate behavioral research, as well as original applications of Facet Theory and related methodological developments to a wide variety of topics in psychology, sociology and economics. Editorial intervention in this collection of papers has been kept to a minimum: The papers, accepted on the basis of their relevance to Facet Theory, are presented essentially as submitted by their author or authors. Dictated by time and budget constraints, this editorial policy may have its advantage: the resulting collection faithfully reflects the current state of proficiency and sophistication in the understanding and application of Facet Theory by Conference participants. We would like to thank all participants for their contributions to the conference program. It is our pleasant duty to acknowledge the financial and moral support from Fordham University, from Cornell University, and from The Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology (SMEP). The Program Committee March, 2016 Samuel Shye, Chair Esther Solomon Ingwer Borg TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................. 2 KEYNOTE ADDRESS - Qualitative Structural Theory: Practical possibilities of partial order projections ................................................................................................................................. 6 DAVID CANTER KEYNOTE ADDRESS - New Directions in Facet Theory ...................................................................... 7 SAMUEL SHYE 1. Systemic quality of life structure of people in poverty: Expanding the "low legitimacy" hypothesis.................................................................................................................................. 8 ZION BARNETZ 2. Using the systemic quality of life model to define and measure residential organizations as action systems: The case of juvenile correctional institutions .................................................. 13 ZION BARNETZ 3. An integrated multidimensional framework for strategic management ................................... 21 DANIEL L. BARROS, BRUNO C. DE SOUZA, ANTONIO ROAZZI 4. Assessing the fit of each item of the ‘Picture-Based Value Survey for Children’ into the theoretical structure of values ................................................................................................. 27 WOLFGANG BILSKY, ANNA K. DÖRING, PATRICK J.F. GROENEN 5. An individual differences model that explains the value circle ................................................. 35 INGWER BORG, ANAT BARDI 6. Exploring the effects of different starting configurations in MDS ............................................. 41 INGWER BORG, PATRICK MAIR 7. How to go beyond bar charts in presenting employee survey results ...................................... 47 INGWER BORG 8. Distributive judgments in contexts of cooperative work and property use .............................. 53 GUILHERME R. E. CABRAL, ANTONIO ROAZZI, BRUNO CAMPELLO de SOUZA, LEONARDO RODRIGUES SAMPAIO 9. Perceived visual quality of popular mall signscape ................................................................... 60 LOURIVAL LOPES COSTA FILHO 10. The evolution of distributive justice in theory and in reality: From a monolithic to a differentiated view ................................................................................................................... 67 ADI FINKELSTEIN 3 11. A comparison of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Facet Theory (FT) approaches to theory and data analysis: Understanding the adjustment of learning disabled college students in Israel .................................................................................................................................... 75 CHARLES W. GREENBAUM, ESTHER BACON KAUFMAN, MICHAL AL-YAGON 12. The OECD ‘Better Life Index’: Faceted SSA validation and multiple scaling by POSAC .............. 84 IDO HABER 13. The measurement of distributive justice attitudes: Multiple scaling by POSAC ........................ 96 YARDEN KEDAR, SAMUEL SHYE 14. Hermeneutic consistency, structured ontology and mereology as embodied in facet theory and the mapping sentence ........................................................................................................... 106 ERIN KOVAL, PAUL M. W. HACKETT 15. Unfolding the values of senior citizens in Bern ....................................................................... 114 RUTH MEYER SCHWEIZER 16. No cry and tears: Criminal narratives of Brazilian young offenders ........................................ 121 CIRCE MARIA GAMA MONTEIRO 17. The analysis of conceptual fields: A synergistic application of facet theory and network analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 129 AMALYA L. OLIVER, MARK EBERS 18. Comparing core profiles between pre- and post-treatments of anorexia nervosa patients: The profile analysis via multidimensional scaling (PAMS) approach .............................................. 135 SE-KANG KIM 19. Importance of a hybrid mapping sentence in developing a self-concept scale for an automobile branding study ....................................................................................................................... 141 SANJAY SETH, DON SCOTT, TAKAHIRO KUDO 20. New Directions in Facet Theory ............................................................................................. 147 SAMUEL SHYE 21. Decision under risk: Facet-theoretic perspective ................................................................... 163 SAMUEL SHYE, IDO HABER 22. Leadership patterns and boardroom dynamics: A facet analytic perspective ......................... 174 ESTHER SOLOMON, MORTEN HUSE 23. Probability distributions and confidence intervals for SSA partitioning using R ...................... 182 BRUNO C. DE SOUZA, ANDRÉ L. WANDERLEY, FERNANDO M. C. DE SOUZA, ANTONIO ROAZZI 4 24. A psychocultural view of the propensity towards homicide: A multidimensional exploration of the culture of honor and psychological mechanisms ............................................................. 188 MONICA G. T. C. DE SOUZA, BRUNO C. DE SOUZA, ANTONIO ROAZZI, EDSON S. DA SILVA 25. The psychological value of the factions system of the fictional “Divergent” trilogy ................ 195 BRUNO C. DE SOUZA, ANTONIO ROAZZI 26. Description of painful experience of children in oncologic treatment and their parents/guardians: A facet analytic perspective .................................................................... 201 STUDART-PEREIRA, L. M 27. Investigating the replicability of the radex model of intelligence ........................................... 207 HEINZ-MARTIN SÜß 28. Social identity of Israeli Arabs in light of the Syrian war ......................................................... 215 HANA ZOABI 29. Children’s value structure: Comparing public and private schools in Brazil............................ 219 ANTONIO ROAZZI, YVES DE ALBUQUERQUE GOMES, BRUNO CAMPELLO DE SOUZA, WOLFGANG BILSKY Index ............................................................................................................................................ 227 5 KEYNOTE ADDRESS - QUALITATIVE STRUCTURAL THEORY: PRACTICAL POSSIBILITIES OF PARTIAL ORDER PROJECTIONS DAVID CANTER, Emeritus Professor, The University of Liverpool, UK ABSTRACT The facet approach, when combined with the appropriate MDS procedures, provides the basis for finding replicable structures in qualitative data. Over more than a quarter of a century the application of this approach has revealed consistent frameworks for many related topics. This has allowed the development of an overarching theory for structures in qualitative data. Qualitative Structural Theory (QST) is of practical significance when empirically established radexes are interpreted drawing on Shye’s (1985; 2014) Faceted Action System Theory. The subsequent derivations of partially ordered systems using POSAC have been found to be of especial value. Drawing on examples drawn from criminal investigations, the utility of QST is illustrated. For example, clear differences between genuine and false rape allegations are demonstrated along the J axis of an appropriately constructed POSAC. Similarly, false television appeals to the public can be differentiated from genuine appeals through feeding linguistic marker identified in a radex into POSAC. Profiles of burglars of investigative significance have also been generated by similar procedures. QST therefore provides a new paradigm for applied research that is rooted in rich theoretical models. 6 KEYNOTE ADDRESS - NEW DIRECTIONS IN FACET THEORY SAMUEL SHYE, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute ABSTRACT1,2 Facet Theory addresses the dual perspectives on the data matrix: Faceted SSA (or Faceted MDS) performed on columns of the data matrix, for structuring multivariate attributes,
Recommended publications
  • Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory 2010-2011

    Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory 2010-2011

    2010-2011 Report including the Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory Preface It is my pleasure to present our 2010-2011 report been possible without a number of our donors from the Orthopaedic Research Center and the stepping up to provide supplemental funding. Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory I’m particularly grateful to Mr. Jim Kennedy for at Colorado State University. Our principal focus providing supplemental operating funds and continues to be solving the significant problems in continuing the legacy of his mother, Barbara Cox equine musculoskeletal disease as can be seen in this Anthony. I’m also grateful to Abigail Kawananakoa report but we also continue to investigate questions for continued support over and above the Endowed relevant to human joint disease and techniques Chair she donated three years ago; and Herbert Allen and devices for human osteoarthritis and articular for continuing to provide considerable support for cartilage repair when the technique can also benefit investigation of cutting edge therapies. the horse. There have been a number of notable projects in this regard. The studies, led by Dr. Dave We have added an Equine Sports Medicine Frisbie at the ORC in partnership with Dr. Alan Ambulatory clinical arm to the Orthopaedic Research Grodzinsky at MIT on an NIH Program Grant in Center and also initiated two residencies in Sports cartilage repair, have been completed and results Medicine and Rehabilitation. This follows on from are still be analyzed. We have three other ongoing the accreditation of a new specialty college, the NIH grants in partnership with collaborators. One is American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and with Dr.
  • Altmetric.Com and Plumx

    Altmetric.Com and Plumx

    This is a preprint of an article published in Scientometrics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03941-y A large-scale comparison of coverage and mentions captured by the two altmetric aggregators- Altmetric.com and PlumX Mousumi Karmakara, Sumit Kumar Banshalb, Vivek Kumar Singha,1 1Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India 2Department of Computer Science, South Asian University, New Delhi-110021, India. Abstract: The increased social media attention to scholarly articles has resulted in creation of platforms & services to track the social media transactions around them. Altmetric.com and PlumX are two such popular altmetric aggregators. Scholarly articles get mentions in different social platforms (such as Twitter, Blog, Facebook) and academic social networks (such as Mendeley, Academia and ResearchGate). The aggregators track activity and events in social media and academic social networks and provide the coverage and transaction data to researchers for various purposes. Some previous studies have compared different altmetric aggregators and found differences in the coverage and mentions captured by them. This paper attempts to revisit the question by doing a large-scale analysis of altmetric mentions captured by the two aggregators, for a set 1,785,149 publication records from Web of Science. Results obtained show that PlumX tracks more altmetric sources and captures altmetric events for a larger number of articles as compared to Altmetric.com. However, the coverage and average mentions of the two aggregators, for the same set of articles, vary across different platforms, with Altmetric.com recording higher mentions in Twitter and Blog, and PlumX recording higher mentions in Facebook and Mendeley.
  • RELX Group Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2015

    RELX Group Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2015

    Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2015 Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2015 RELX Group is a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries. We help scientists make new discoveries, lawyers win cases, doctors save lives and insurance companies offer customers lower prices. We save taxpayers and consumers money by preventing fraud and help executives forge commercial relationships with their clients. In short, we enable our customers to make better decisions, get better results and be more productive. RELX PLC is a London listed holding company which owns 52.9 percent of RELX Group. RELX NV is an Amsterdam listed holding company which owns 47.1 percent of RELX Group. Forward-looking statements The Reports and Financial Statements 2015 contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those currently being anticipated. The terms “estimate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “should be”, “will be”, “believe”, “trends” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause future outcomes to differ from those foreseen in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to competitive factors in the industries in which the Group operates; demand for the Group’s products and services; exchange rate fluctuations; general economic and business conditions; legislative, fiscal, tax and regulatory developments and political risks; the availability of third-party content and data; breaches of our data security systems and interruptions in our information technology systems; changes in law and legal interpretations affecting the Group’s intellectual property rights and other risks referenced from time to time in the filings of the Group with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

    Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research

    Author guidelines Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) and its French version Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique (RCOT) publish original scientific works in English and French related to orthopaedics from all domains. All the original articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, review articles, technical notes, concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English and French (OTSR-RCOT does not publish Case reports): in English (OTSR) in electronic form only and in French (RCOT) in paper and electronic editions. Only the English version (OTSR) is indexed in international databases. Original articles must not have been published elsewhere or be simultaneously submitted for publication in another journal. The journal agrees to use the “Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals” (www.icjme.org). It also adheres to the rules developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the recommendations of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). Authors must submit an electronic version only of the article using the journal’s online submission site: https://www.editorialmanager.com/otsr/. French-speaking authors should submit in French. Non-French-speaking authors can submit in either French or English. All articles accepted and submitted in French will be translated from French to English by the Editorial Board. Manuscripts submitted in English will not be translated into French. When the original article is submitted in English, the corresponding French version in RCOT contains only the title (in French and English), the abstract in French or English, and the reference needed to access the full-text article.
  • Dissecting the Sundance Curse: Exploring Discrepancies Between Film Reviews by Professional and Amateur Critics

    Dissecting the Sundance Curse: Exploring Discrepancies Between Film Reviews by Professional and Amateur Critics

    Dissecting the Sundance Curse by Lucas Buck — 27 Dissecting the Sundance Curse: Exploring Discrepancies Between Film Reviews by Professional and Amateur Critics Lucas Buck Cinema and Television Arts Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract There has been a growing discrepancy between professional-critic film reviews and audience-originating film reviews. In fact, these occurrences have become so routine, industry writers often reference a “Sundance Curse” – when a buzzy festival-circuit film bombs with the general public, commercially or critically. This study examines this inconsistency to determine which aspects of a film tend to draw the most attention from each respective type of critic. A qualitative content analysis of 20 individual reviews was conducted to determine which elements present in a film garnered the most attention from the reviewers, and whether that attention was positive, negative or neutral. This study indicates that audience film reviewers overwhelmingly focused on the “emotional response” gleaned from their movie-going experience above all other aspects of the film, whereas professional critics focused attention to more tangible – above-the-line contributions, such as direction, performances, and writing. I. Introduction As one of the most talked-about films of the 2018 Sundance Film Festival, theA24-released Hereditary became the breakout horror film of the year, opening in nearly 3,000 theaters and raking in $79 million while produced on just a $10 million production budget (Cusumano, 2018). Despite the obvious box office success, Hereditary’s word-of-mouth power seemed to have mostly been driven by glowing critical reviews, rather than by the opinion of audiences who paid to see the film.
  • Prohibiting Product Placement and the Use of Characters in Marketing to Children by Professor Angela J. Campbell Georgetown Univ

    Prohibiting Product Placement and the Use of Characters in Marketing to Children by Professor Angela J. Campbell Georgetown Univ

    PROHIBITING PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND THE USE OF CHARACTERS IN MARKETING TO CHILDREN BY PROFESSOR ANGELA J. CAMPBELL1 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER (DRAFT September 7, 2005) 1 Professor Campbell thanks Natalie Smith for her excellent research assistance, Russell Sullivan for pointing out examples of product placements, and David Vladeck, Dale Kunkel, Jennifer Prime, and Marvin Ammori for their helpful suggestions. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Product Placements............................................................................................................. 4 A. The Practice of Product Placement......................................................................... 4 B. The Regulation of Product Placements................................................................. 11 II. Character Marketing......................................................................................................... 16 A. The Practice of Celebrity Spokes-Character Marketing ....................................... 17 B. The Regulation of Spokes-Character Marketing .................................................. 20 1. FCC Regulation of Host-Selling............................................................... 21 2. CARU Guidelines..................................................................................... 22 3. Federal Trade Commission....................................................................... 24
  • NEO™-PI-3) Basic Report for Business Client Information

    NEO™-PI-3) Basic Report for Business Client Information

    NEO™ Personality Inventory-3 (NEO™-PI-3) Basic Report for Business Client Information Results for: Sam Sample Gender: Male Age: 30 Report Date: Sunday, September 26, 2021 Norms: Combined Gender, Adult The following report is intended to provide information on five basic dimensions of personality and their corresponding facets. The report is based on research using normal samples and is intended to provide information on the basic dimensions of personality. The results presented in this report should be integrated with all other sources of information before reaching any professional decisions about this individual. Decisions should never be based solely on the information contained in this report. This report is confidential and intended for use by qualified professionals only; it should not be released to the individual being evaluated. On the following page, you will find T scores and percentile scores for each factor scale. This information is also provided for each facet scale, in addition to the raw score. The remaining pages of the report provide scale descriptions, item responses, and administrative indices. Reproduced by special permission of the Publisher, Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 16204 North Florida Avenue, Lutz, Florida, 33549. Copyright © 2010 by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission from PAR, Inc. NEO™-PI-3 Basic Report Page: 2 Report for: Sam Sample Report Date: 9/26/2021 NEO-PI-3 Scale Scores Norms: Combined Gender, Adult Factor
  • Emotion Recognition from Posed and Spontaneous Dynamic Expressions

    Emotion Recognition from Posed and Spontaneous Dynamic Expressions

    Running head: POSED AND SPONTANEOUS Emotion recognition from posed and spontaneous dynamic expressions: Human observers vs. machine analysis Eva G. Krumhuber University College London Dennis Küster University of Bremen Jacobs University Bremen Shushi Namba Hiroshima University Datin Shah University College London Manuel G. Calvo University of La Laguna Eva G. Krumhuber and Datin Shah, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London; Dennis Küster, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, and Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen; Shushi Namba, Department of Psychology, Hiroshima University; Manuel G. Calvo, Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of La Laguna. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Eva G. Krumhuber, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] Word Count: 2493 1 Running head: POSED AND SPONTANEOUS Abstract The majority of research on the judgment of emotion from facial expressions has focused on deliberately posed displays, often sampled from single stimulus sets. Herein, we investigate emotion recognition from posed and spontaneous expressions, comparing classification performance between humans and machine in a cross-corpora investigation. For this, dynamic facial stimuli portraying the six basic emotions were sampled from a broad range of different databases, and then presented to human observers and a machine classifier. Recognition performance by the machine was found to be superior for posed expressions containing prototypical facial patterns, and comparable to humans when classifying emotions from spontaneous displays. In both humans and machine, accuracy rates were generally higher for posed compared to spontaneous stimuli.
  • Ranking of Academic Publishers

    Ranking of Academic Publishers

    2016 Ranking of Academic Publishers For book publishers there is no internationally accepted system of ranking. This system is based on those used by SENSE (www.sense.nl) Refereed book publications: A: Refereed book publications published by the world top of publishers B: Refereed book publications published by the world’s semi-top of publishers C: Refereed book publications published by other publishers Rank Publisher A Academic Press A California University Press A Cambridge University Press A Clarendon Press A Cornell University Press A Columbia University Press A Harvard University Press A Hoover Institution Press A John Wiley A John’s Hopkins University Press A MIT Press Cambridge Mass A Oxford University Press A Pennsylvania University Press A Pergamon Press A Stanford University Press A Princeton University A Routledge A Routledge Curzon A Sage A University of Chicago Press A University of Pennsylvania Press A Wiley A Wiley-Blackwell A Yale University Press B Allen and Unwin B American Chemical Society B American Institute of Physics B Australian National University Press B Ashgate B Aspen B Ashgate/Avebury B Basic Books, Inc. B Berg Publishers B Blackwell B Bloomsbury B Birkh├ñuser B Brill B Butterworth-Heinemann B Callwey B Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press B Curzon Press B Duke University Press B Earthscan B Edward Elgar B Elsevier Science B Frank Cass B Garrisberg MacMillan B Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. B Harper & Row Publishers, Inc./Ballinger Publishing Co. B Harwood Academic Publishers B Hart B Heinemann B Humana Press B IEEE B IEEE Computer Society B Indiana University Press B Island Press B James Currey B Karger Publishers B Karthala B Kegan Paul International B Kluwer Academic Publishers B Kluwer Law International B Lexington Books B Lippincott Williams & Wilkins B Lit Verlag B Lynn Rienner Publishers B M.E.Sharpe Inc.
  • The Construts of Agreeableness.Pmd

    The Construts of Agreeableness.Pmd

    39 The construct of agreeableness: Facet vs. item level analysis Rebecca A. Newgent, Sang Min Lee, Kristin K. Higgins, and Sean W. Mulvenon University of Arkansas Joanie V. Connors Fayetteville, Arkansas Abstract The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) was developed to operationalize the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Using correlational analysis and confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, the present study investigates the facet structure of the domain of Agreeableness of the NEO- PI-R at the facet and item level to assess which is a more appropriate level of analysis for interpretation. While the six Agreeableness facets fit the domain, the results of confirmatory factor analysis indicate that the original six facet model at the item level did not fit the data well. Exploratory factor analysis indicates that only 35 of the 48 items associated with the Agreeableness domain had salient loadings on their intended facet. Results indicate that performing item-level factor analysis can produce misleading or un-interpretable results. Implications for research and assessment are discussed. The Construct of Agreeableness: Facet vs. Item Level Analysis The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992a) was originally developed in 1978 as the NEO Inventory. The NEO Inventory consisted of three domain scales and 18 facet scales which measured Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience (Costa & McCrae, 1992b). Scales, consisting of 18 items, were added in 1985 to measure the domains of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, and the inventory was renamed the NEO Personality Inventory. These new domain scales were inadequate in capturing the complete personality picture as the number of items was limited.
  • Discontinued-Sources-From-Scopus September 2020.Xlsx

    Discontinued-Sources-From-Scopus September 2020.Xlsx

    Status: September Newly added titles are highlighted in orange. FINAL COVERAGE: Last processed in Scopus. 2020 Disclaimer: The content that will be the final coverage for these titles may not be available in Scopus yet. In those cases, the missing content may be added to Scopus in due Source record ID Title P-ISSN E-ISSN Publisher Reason for YEAR VOLUME ISSUE Page range discontinuation 18665 ABB Review 1013-3119 A B B Corporate Management Services AGRadar 19700182619 Academic Journal of Cancer Research International Digital Organization for ScientificPublication Information Concerns (IDOSI)2013 6 2 - 19700175175 Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 1095-6298 1528-2678 Allied Academies Publication Concerns2016 20 Special Issue97-103 1 16755 Acta Bioquimica Clinica Latinoamericana 0325-2957 1851-6114 Federacion Bioquimica de la Provincia de BuenosMetrics Aires 2017 51 3 395-407 27819 Acta Endoscopica 0240-642X1958-5454Springer Metrics 2016 46 6 384-388 26562 Acta Medica Nagasakiensia 0001-6055 Nagasaki University School Of Medicine Metrics 2018 61 4 183-188 19399 Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica 0001-6659 1587-1495 Magyar Gyogyszerésztudományi Társaság Metrics 2018 88 4 249-252 13884 Acta Technica CSAV (Ceskoslovensk Akademie Ved) 0001-7043 Academy Of Sciences Of The Czech RepublicRADAR 2018 63 6 921-926 19700167903 Actual Problems of Economics 1993-6788 National Academy of Management Publication Concerns2016 186 12 458-480 19700187642 Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 2042-4868 2042-4876 Maxwell Scientific Publications Publication
  • The Facet Atlas: Using Network Analysis to Describe the Blends, Cores, and Peripheries of Personality Structure

    The Facet Atlas: Using Network Analysis to Describe the Blends, Cores, and Peripheries of Personality Structure

    The facet atlas: Using network analysis to describe the blends, cores, and peripheries of personality structure Ted Schwaba, Mijke Rhemtulla, Christopher J. Hopwood, & Wiebke Bleidorn University of California, Davis Objective: We created a facet atlas that maps the interrelations between facet scales from 13 hierarchical personality inventories to provide a practically useful, transtheoretical description of lower-level personality traits. Method: We generated the atlas by estimating a series of network models that visualize the correlations among 268 facet scales administered to the Eugene-Springfield Community Sample (N=1,134). Results: As expected, most facets contained a blend of content from multiple Big Five domains and were part of multiple Big Five networks. We identified core and peripheral facets for each Big Five domain. Discussion: Results from this study resolve some inconsistencies in facet placement across instruments and highlights the complexity of personality structure relative to the constraints of traditional hierarchical models that impose simple structure. The facet atlas (also available as an online point-and-click app) provides a guide for researchers who wish to measure a domain with a limited set of facets as well as information about the core and periphery of each personality domain. To illustrate the value of a facet atlas in applied and theoretical settings, we examined the network structure of scales measuring impulsivity and tested structural hypotheses from the Big Five Aspect Scales inventory. Keywords: personality traits, personality facets, Big Five, network analysis, five-factor model The facet atlas: Using network analysis to describe the blends, cores, and peripheries of personality structure Over the past few decades, a general consensus has emerged regarding the structure of individual differences in higher order personality traits (John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008).