Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks, Including Techniques, Indica- Andand Tions and Potential Complications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks, Including Techniques, Indica- Andand Tions and Potential Complications MedicalContinuing Education CLINICAL PODIATRY Objectives PoplitealPopliteal 1) Explain the details of the popliteal and saphenous nerve blocks, including techniques, indica- andand tions and potential complications. 2) Explain the value of this type of regional anesthetic block, when SaphenousSaphenous general, spinal anesthesia and ankle block anesthesia is contraindicated. Nerve 3) Show the wide range of surgi- Nerve cal procedures that can be done using these techniques. BlocksBlocks 4) Demonstrate the possibilities of incorporating these techniques into residency training programs where lower-extremity surgery is done. 5) Show the value of these blocks This is an as an adjunct to post-operative anal- alternative to gesia. general or spinal 6) Suggest the potential value of anesthesia for these techniques in developing re- gions around the world where gen- surgery of the leg, eral and spinal anesthesia are not ankle and foot. readily available. Welcome to Podiatry Management’s CME Instructional program. Our journal has been approved as a sponsor of Contin- uing Medical Education by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education. You may enroll: 1) on a per issue basis (at $17.50 per topic) or 2) per year, for the special introductory rate of $109 (you save $66). You may submit the answer sheet, along with the other information requested, via mail, fax, or phone. In the near future, you may be able to submit via the Internet. If you correctly answer seventy (70%) of the questions correctly, you will receive a certificate attesting to your earned cred- its. You will also receive a record of any incorrectly answered questions. If you score less than 70%, you can retake the test at no additional cost. A list of states currently honoring CPME approved credits is listed on pg. 190. Other than those entities cur- rently accepting CPME-approved credit, Podiatry Management cannot guarantee that these CME credits will be acceptable by any state licensing agency, hospital, managed care organization or other entity. PM will, however, use its best efforts to ensure the widest acceptance of this program possible. This instructional CME program is designed to supplement, NOT replace, existing CME seminars. The goal of this program is to advance the knowledge of practicing podiatrists. We will endeavor to publish high quality manuscripts by noted authors and researchers. If you have any questions or comments about this program, you can write or call us at: Podia- try Management, P.O. Box 490, East Islip, NY 11730, (631) 563-1604 or e-mail us at [email protected]. Following this article, an answer sheet and full set of instructions are provided (p. 190).—Editor By Cornelius M. Donohue III, DPM, Larry Common types of local anesthetic proximal to the ankle as an alterna- R. Goss, DPM, and Larry B. Dyal, DPM, MS blocks performed by foot and ankle tive to general or spinal anesthesia. surgeons include local infiltration, Use of a saphenous nerve block ocal anesthesia has long been digital blocks, ray blocks and ankle (SNB) at the proximal leg segment used for lower extremity sur- blocks. Consideration can be given combined with the terminal sciatic Lgery with immense success. to regional anesthesia at a level Continued on page 184 www.podiatrym.com JUNE/JULY 2004 • PODIATRY MANAGEMENT 183 Nerve Blocks... pared to general anesthesia, they carry fewer inherent risks, especially Continuingnerve block or popliteal fossa for the compromised or chronically ill nerve block (PFNB) results in patient. Many patients who require Medical Education complete anesthesia below the knee surgical intervention are diabetic, hy- for soft tissue and osseous proce- pertensive and have cardiac disease. A dures. Advocacy for more frequent significant number of these patients use of this method of anesthesia, as are not good candidates for general well as anatomical considerations, anesthesia. In addition, compared alternative techniques and surgical with general anesthesia, the neuroen- applications are reviewed. docrine response with regional anes- Incorporation of a terminal sciatic thesia is significantly inhibited due to or popliteal fossa nerve block (PFNB) the blockade of spinothalamic tract Figure 2 and a saphenous nerve block (SNB) afferent impulses and their stimula- has certain advantages over general tion of hypothalamic-pituitary- past with good results; however, it is and spinal anesthesia for surgery of adrenal pathways.1 Intra-operative still not routinely used in the United the leg, ankle and foot. When com- and post-operative hemodynamic dis- States and other countries, both de- turbances are mini- veloped and developing.7, 8, 9 In fact, in mized as a result of 1980, Rorie, et al. reported an 88.2% this blockade. The overall satisfaction rate in a study of value of inhibiting 119 patients.10 Infrequent use of this the neuroendocine block method may be related to lack response can be espe- of resident training, concerns over op- cially appreciated in erating room efficiency and an unpre- the diabetic patient, dictable success rate of the block.11, 12, 13 where the secretion of cortisol and other Anatomical Considerations steroids is mini- Formed from spinal roots L4-S2 mized. Both general and occasionally S3, the sciatic and spinal anesthesia nerve consists of two distinct divi- increase the risk of sions, the tibial nerve (TN) and post-operative com- common peroneal nerve (CPN) plications, including (Figure 1).4 They share a common nausea and vomiting epineural sheath from their origin and prolonged recov- to the popliteal fossa.14 In the ery.2, 3 popliteal fossa, the sciatic nerve is When compared termed the popliteal nerve. At a Figure 1 to spinal anesthesia, variable distance above the this procedure yields popliteal fossa crease, the popliteal no risk of postdural nerve divides into two separate puncture headache, nerves, the TN and CPN. Therefore, and unlike spinal a popliteal nerve block is essentially anesthesia, the anes- the terminal block of the sciatic thetic effect is unilat- nerve at the level of the knee.15 eral. Compared to The TN is the larger of the two more proximal ap- branches and runs parallel and proaches to the sciat- slightly lateral to the midline. Infe- ic nerve block, the riorly, it passes between the heads popliteal block spares of the gastrocnemius muscle.15 The the hamstring mus- CPN follows the tendon of the bi- cles and promotes ceps femoris muscle laterally and immediate post-oper- travels around the fibular head as it ative ambulation. In leaves the popliteal fossa. Both addition, a popliteal nerves innervate the entire leg block can provide below the knee except for the an- prolonged post-oper- teromedial aspects of the leg and ative analgesia and foot, which are innervated by the can be performed in saphenous nerve (L2-L4).16 patients being treated with anticoagulant General Principles therapy.4, 5, 6 Many au- Suggested anatomic landmarks thors have advocated for determining needle insertion Figure 3 this procedure in the Continued on page 185 184 PODIATRY MANAGEMENT • JUNE/JULY 2004 www.podiatrym.com MedicalContinuing Education Nerve Blocks... approach.28 Confirmed by MRI, they The need to position found an accuracy of 75% compared the patient in the prone posi- points for the tibial and common to 25% with the classical approach. tion is the main disadvantage of peroneal blocks have been catego- Hadzic, et al. found that the muscle either of the posterior approach rized into two approaches: the classi- boundaries of the popliteal triangle are techniques to the sciatic nerve block cal and intertendinous methods.17 often difficult to appreciate with any in the popliteal fossa, and may pro- Both of these approaches can be per- reproducible accuracy. Subsequently, hibit its use in certain circumstances. formed with or without a peripheral placement of the needle is often made Conditions such as advanced preg- nerve stimulator (Figure 2). The value too far lateral for contact with the sci- nancy, morbid obesity, spine and of a peripheral nerve stimulator is atic nerve using the classical approach. hemodynamic instability, and me- that it takes advantage of the clinical Subsequent medial redirection of the chanical ventilation are examples that motor activity of the tibial and com- needle for sciatic nerve contact may may prevent the use of the prone po- mon peroneal nerves in locating an carry an increased risk of puncturing sition.31 However, the lateral approach appropriate injection point for the the popliteal vessels, especially when to the sciatic nerve can result in reli- local anesthesia.9, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 This needles longer than 40 mm are used able anesthesia, comparable to that of technique removes some of the (Figure 4).17, 20 In addition, needles in- the posterior approach. Execution of guesswork from positioning the nee- serted using the classical approach are the block using the lateral approach is dle, because when the peripheral relatively straightforward when the nerve stimulator is not used, the only described technique is followed, al- clinical symptom assisting the clini- though it may take more attempts at cian is the elicitation of paresthesias. As with any nerve localization. In addition to uti- Precise placement of the needle lizing the lateral approach in patients during the popliteal block is impor- anesthesia procedure, who cannot assume the prone posi- tant because of a potential differen- these approaches do tion, this technique provides the op- tial blockade of the tibial and com- tion of performing supplementary mon peroneal nerves. Vloka, et al. carry potential blocks (i.e., saphenous or femoral found that this may be due to a com- complications. nerve blocks) and surgery without the mon epineural sheath.14 Additionally, need for patient repositioning.24, 29, 30 the peripheral nerve stimulator is a valuable tool in the obese patient or Block Technique where there is acute or chronic defor- more prone to transect the body of the Techniques described here are mity of the popliteal region.
Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,074,961 B2 Wang Et Al
    US007074961B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,074,961 B2 Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 11, 2006 (54) ANTIDEPRESSANTS AND THEIR 6.211,171 B1 4/2001 Sawynok et al. ANALOGUES AS LONG-ACTING LOCAL 6,545,057 B1 4/2003 Wang et al. ANESTHETCS AND ANALGESCS 2001/0036943 A1 11/2001 Coe et al. (75) Inventors: Ging Kuo Wang, Westwood, MA (US); FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Peter Gerner, Weston, MA (US); Donald K. Verrecchia, Winchester, MA CH 534124 A 2, 1973 (US) WO WO95/17903 A1 7, 1995 WO WO95/1818.6 A1 7, 1995 (73) Assignee: The Brigham and Women's Hospital, WO WO 99.59.598 A1 11, 1999 Inc., Boston, MA (US) WO WO O2/060870 A2 8, 2002 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 451 days. Luo et al., Xenobiotica, vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 291-301, 1995.* (21) Appl. No.: 10/117,708 Ehlert et al., The Interaction of Amitriptyline, Doxepin, Imipramine and Their N-Methyl Quaternary Ammonium (22) Filed: Apr. 4, 2002 Derivatives with Subtypes of Muscarinic Receptors in Brain (65) Prior Publication Data and Heart, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Apr. 1990, vol. 253, No. 1, pp. 13–19. US 2003/00968.05 A1 May 22, 2003 Gerner, P., et al., Anesthesiology (2002) 96:1435–42. Related U.S. Application Dat e pplication Uata Khan, M.A., et al., Anesthesiology (2002) 96:109–16. (63) stripps'965,138, filed on Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Brachial Plexus and Lumbosacral Plexus (Edited).Pdf
    Color Code Brachial Plexus and Lumbosacral Important Doctors Notes Plexus Notes/Extra explanation Please view our Editing File before studying this lecture to check for any changes. Objectives At the end of this lecture, the students should be able to : Describe the formation of brachial plexus (site, roots) List the main branches of brachial plexus Describe the formation of lumbosacral plexus (site, roots) List the main branches of lumbosacral plexus Describe the important Applied Anatomy related to the brachial & lumbosacral plexuses. Brachial Plexus Formation Playlist o It is formed in the posterior triangle of the neck. o It is the union of the anterior rami (or ventral) of the 5th ,6th ,7th ,8th cervical and the 1st thoracic spinal nerves. o The plexus is divided into 5 stages: • Roots • Trunks • Divisions • Cords • Terminal branches Really Tired? Drink Coffee! Brachial Plexus A P A P P A Brachial Plexus Trunks Divisions Cords o Upper (superior) trunk o o Union of the roots of Each trunk divides into Posterior cord: C5 & C6 anterior and posterior From the 3 posterior division divisions of the 3 trunks o o Middle trunk Lateral cord: From the anterior Continuation of the divisions of the upper root of C7 Branches and middle trunks o All three cords will give o Medial cord: o Lower (inferior) trunk branches in the axilla, It is the continuation of Union of the roots of the anterior division of C8 & T1 those will supply their respective regions. the lower trunk The Brachial Plexus Long Thoracic (C5,6,7) Anterior divisions Nerve to Subclavius(C5,6) Posterior divisions Dorsal Scapular(C5) Suprascapular(C5,6) upper C5 trunk Lateral Cord C6 middle (2LM) trunk C7 lower C8 trunk T1 Posterior Cord (ULTRA) Medial Cord (4MU) In the PowerPoint presentation this slide is animated.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutaneous Innervation of the Lower Limb Cutaneous Nerves on the Front of the Thigh
    Cutaneous Innervation of the Lower Limb https://www.earthslab.com/anatomy/cutaneous-innervation-of-the-lower-limb/ Cutaneous nerves on the front of the thigh • The ilio-inguinal nerve (L1) • The femoral branch of genitofemoral nerve (L1, L2) • The lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh (L2, L3) • The intermediate cutaneous nerve of thigh (L2, L3) • The medial cutaneous nerve of thigh (L2, L3) • The saphenous nerve (L3,4) https://www.slideshare.net/DrMohammadMahmoud/2-front-of-the-thigh-ii https://slideplayer.com/slide/9424949/ Cutaneous nerves of the gluteal region • Subcostal (T12) and ilio- hypogastric (L1) nerves • Posterior primary rami of L1,2,3 and S1,2,3 • Lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh (L2,3) • Posterior cutaneous nerve of thigh (S1,2,3) and perforating cutaneous nerve (S2,3) Cutaneous nerves on the front of leg and dorsum of foot • The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve • The saphenous nerve • The lateral cutaneous nerve of the calf • The superficial peroneal nerve • The sural nerve • The deep peroneal nerve • The digital branches of the medial and lateral plantar nerves Cutaneous nerves on the back of leg • Saphenous nerve (L3, L4) • Posterior division of the medial cutaneous nerve of the thigh (L2, L3) • Posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh (S1, S2, S3) • Sural nerve (L5, S1, S2) • Lateral cutaneous nerve of the calf (L4, L5, S1) • Peroneal or sural communicating nerve (L5, S1, S2) • Medial calcanean branches (S1, S2) Cutaneous nerves of the sole • Medial calcaneal branches of tibial nerve • Branches from medial plantar nerve • Branches from lateral plantar nerve SEGMENTAL INNERVATION Dermatomes • The area of skin supplied by one spinal segment is called a dermatome.
    [Show full text]
  • Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Blocks for Total Knee Replacement in an Obese Patient with a Previous History of Failed Endotracheal Intubation −A Case Report−
    Anesth Pain Med 2011; 6: 270~274 ■Case Report■ Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for total knee replacement in an obese patient with a previous history of failed endotracheal intubation −A case report− Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea Jong Hae Kim, Woon Seok Roh, Jin Yong Jung, Seok Young Song, Jung Eun Kim, and Baek Jin Kim Peripheral nerve block has frequently been used as an alternative are situations in which spinal or epidural anesthesia cannot be to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in patients conducted, such as coagulation disturbances, sepsis, local undergoing total knee replacement. However, there are few reports infection, immune deficiency, severe spinal deformity, severe demonstrating that the combination of femoral and sciatic nerve blocks (FSNBs) can provide adequate analgesia and muscle decompensated hypovolemia and shock. Moreover, factors relaxation during total knee replacement. We experienced a case associated with technically difficult neuraxial blocks influence of successful FSNBs for a total knee replacement in a 66 year-old the anesthesiologist’s decision to perform the procedure [1]. In female patient who had a previous cancelled surgery due to a failed tracheal intubation followed by a difficult mask ventilation for 50 these cases, peripheral nerve block can provide a good solution minutes, 3 days before these blocks. FSNBs were performed with for operations on a lower extremity. The combination of 50 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine because she had conditions precluding femoral and sciatic nerve blocks (FSNBs) has frequently been neuraxial blocks including a long distance from the skin to the used for postoperative pain control after total knee replacement epidural space related to a high body mass index and nonpalpable lumbar spinous processes.
    [Show full text]
  • VHA/Dod CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE for the MANAGEMENT of POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    VHA/DoD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Veterans Health Administration Department of Defense Prepared by: THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Working Group with support from: The Office of Performance and Quality, VHA, Washington, DC & Quality Management Directorate, United States Army MEDCOM VERSION 1.2 JULY 2001/ UPDATE MAY 2002 VHA/DOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS Version 1.2 Version 1.2 VHA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Postoperative Pain TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. ALGORITHM & ANNOTATIONS • Preoperative Pain Management.....................................................................................................1 • Postoperative Pain Management ...................................................................................................2 B. PAIN ASSESSMENT C. SITE-SPECIFIC PAIN MANAGEMENT • Summary Table: Site-Specific Pain Management Interventions ................................................1 • Head and Neck Surgery..................................................................................................................3 - Ophthalmic Surgery - Craniotomies Surgery - Radical Neck Surgery - Oral-maxillofacial • Thorax (Non-cardiac) Surgery.......................................................................................................9 - Thoracotomy - Mastectomy - Thoracoscopy • Thorax (Cardiac) Surgery............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies
    LOWER EXTREMITY FOCAL NEUROPATHIES Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies Arturo A. Leis, MD S.H. Subramony, MD Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan, MD, MBBS Mark A. Ross, MD AANEM 59th Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Copyright © September 2012 American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine 2621 Superior Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 Printed by Johnson Printing Company, Inc. 1 Please be aware that some of the medical devices or pharmaceuticals discussed in this handout may not be cleared by the FDA or cleared by the FDA for the specific use described by the authors and are “off-label” (i.e., a use not described on the product’s label). “Off-label” devices or pharmaceuticals may be used if, in the judgment of the treating physician, such use is medically indicated to treat a patient’s condition. Information regarding the FDA clearance status of a particular device or pharmaceutical may be obtained by reading the product’s package labeling, by contacting a sales representative or legal counsel of the manufacturer of the device or pharmaceutical, or by contacting the FDA at 1-800-638-2041. 2 LOWER EXTREMITY FOCAL NEUROPATHIES Lower Extremity Focal Neuropathies Table of Contents Course Committees & Course Objectives 4 Faculty 5 Basic and Special Nerve Conduction Studies of the Lower Limbs 7 Arturo A. Leis, MD Common Peroneal Neuropathy and Foot Drop 19 S.H. Subramony, MD Mononeuropathies Affecting Tibial Nerve and its Branches 23 Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan, MD, MBBS Femoral, Obturator, and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Neuropathies 27 Mark A. Ross, MD CME Questions 33 No one involved in the planning of this CME activity had any relevant financial relationships to disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Briefing, Joint Meeting of Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug
    1 FDA Briefing Document Joint Meeting of Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee January 15, 2020 (AM Session) 2 DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The attached package contains background information prepared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the panel members of the advisory committee. The FDA background package often contains assessments and/or conclusions and recommendations written by individual FDA reviewers. Such conclusions and recommendations do not necessarily represent the final position of the individual reviewers, nor do they necessarily represent the final position of the Review Division or Office. The new drug application (NDA) 213426 for tramadol 44mg and celecoxib 56mg tablet, which contains a fixed dose combination of an opioid and an NSAID for the management of acute pain in adults that is severe enough to require an opioid analgesic and for which alternative treatments are inadequate, has been brought to this Advisory Committee in order to gain the Committee’s insights and opinions. The background package may not include all issues relevant to the final regulatory recommendation and instead is intended to focus on issues identified by the Agency for discussion by the advisory committee. The FDA will not issue a final determination on the issues at hand until input from the advisory committee process has been considered and all reviews have been finalized. The final determination may be affected by issues not discussed at the advisory committee meeting. 3 FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Joint Meeting of the Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee and Drug Safety & Risk Management Advisory Committee January 15, 2020 Table of Contents 1 Division Memorandum .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT in ERAS PROTOCOLS 1
    Running head: ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT IN ERAS PROTOCOLS 1 ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT IN ERAS PROTOCOLS FOR TOTAL KNEE AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW Laura Oseka, BSN, RN Bryan College of Health Sciences ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT IN ERAS PROTOCOLS 2 Abstract Aims and objectives: The aim of this integrative review is to provide current, evidence-based anesthetic and analgesic recommendations for inclusion in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Articles published between 2006 and December 2016 were critically appraised for validity, reliability, and rigor of study. Results: The administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, and steroids result in shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) and decreased postoperative pain and opioid consumption. A spinal anesthetic block provides benefits over general anesthesia, such as decreased 30-day mortality rates, hospital LOS, blood loss, and complications in the hospital. The use of peripheral nerve blocks result in lower pain scores, decreased opioid consumption, fewer complications, and shorter hospital LOS. Conclusion: Perioperative anesthetic management in ERAS protocols for TKA and THA patients should include the administration of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, gabapentinoids, and steroids. Preferred intraoperative anesthetic management in ERAS protocols should consist of spinal anesthesia with light sedation. Postoperative pain should be
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd International Congress on Ambulatory Surgery April 25–28, 1999
    Ambulatory Surgery 7 (1999) S1–S108 Abstracts 3rd International Congress on Ambulatory Surgery April 25–28, 1999 suitable and consistent information about the disease, its treatment Organization and Management and possible consequences both of the disease and of its treatment. Lack of information can make the contract null and void causing a physician to act against the law. For the consent to be valid it has to Severity of symptoms following day case cystoscopy be given by a Subject in full possession of his/her faculties or aged to be as such. The surgeon’s obligation so established in the contract is M Cripps the obligation of means or diligence in his/her performance and not Lecturer Practitioner, Day Surgery Unit, Salisbury District Hospital, an obligation to results. A surgeon therefore acts within the limits of Wiltshire, England a behaviour obligation and not of an obligation to results. Neverthe- less this is an apparent distinction, as a fact, considered as a mean in INTRODUCTION: This is the result of a collaborative study under- respect of a subsequent aim, will be a result when assessed as such, taken by six Day Surgery Units around South West England looking and as the final stage of a limited sequence of facts. at the morbidity following day case cystoscopy. Critical management factors (CMF) in an ambulatory surgery center METHODS: The study investigated, through patient questionnaire, the patients’ experience in the first 48 hours post surgery of pain, RC Williams sickness, presence of haematuria, burning on micturition, frequency of micturition and contacts with health care professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthetic Requirements Measured by Bilateral Bispectral Analysis and Femoral Blockade in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017;67(5):472---479 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Publicação Oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia ANESTESIOLOGIA www.sba.com.br SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE Anesthetic requirements measured by bilateral bispectral analysis and femoral blockade in total knee arthroplasty ∗ Maylin Koo , Javier Bocos, Antoni Sabaté, Vinyet López, Carmina Ribes Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Servicio de Anestesia y Medicina Intensiva, Barcelona, Spain Received 14 January 2016; accepted 20 July 2016 Available online 28 August 2016 KEYWORDS Abstract Nerve block; Background and objectives: A continuous peripheral nerve blockade has proved benefits on Pain management; reducing postoperative morphine consumption; the combination of a femoral blockade and Bispectral index general anesthesia on reducing intraoperative anesthetic requirements has not been studied. monitor; The objective of this study was to determine the relevance of timing in the performance of Levopubicaine femoral block to intraoperative anesthetic requirements during general anesthesia for total hydrochloride; knee arthroplasty. Knee arthroplasty Methods: A single-center, prospective cohort study on patients scheduled for total knee arthro- plasty, were sequentially allocated to receive 20 mL of 2% mepivacaine throughout a femoral catheter, prior to anesthesia induction (Preoperative) or when skin closure started (Postopera- tive). An algorithm based on bispectral values guided intraoperative anesthetic management. Postoperative analgesia was done with an elastomeric pump of levobupivacaine 0.125% con- nected to the femoral catheter and complemented with morphine patient control analgesia for 48 hours. The Kruskall Wallis and the chi-square tests were used to compare variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: There were 94 patients, 47 preoperative and 47 postoperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia
    REVIEW ARTICLE Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Regional Anesthesia Stephen M. Klein, MD,* M. Steve Melton, MD,* Warren M. Grill, PhD,Þ and Karen C. Nielsen, MD* the patient; (2) improved patient comfort, because a paresthesia Abstract: Peripheral nerve stimulation has a long history in regional technique can be painful or unpleasant compared with nerve anesthesia. Despite the advent of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve stimulation; and (3) a perceived improvement in accuracy.4Y6 blockade, nerve stimulation remains a popular technique used alone or, This transition in clinical practice preceded a great deal of the now, in combination with ultrasound-guided techniques. In light of this literature that describes the principles of electrical nerve locali- evolving utility of nerve stimulation, this is an appropriate time to review zation. Today, a similar, more rapid evolution in technology and the basic concepts and knowledge base of this historically important tool. practice is occurring between nerve stimulation and ultrasound- Electrical nerve stimulation facilitates nerve localization, using threshold guided regional anesthesia. However, despite the popularity current as a surrogate for needle-to-nerve distance. Preferential activation of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, nerve stimulation of motor nerves is possible because motor nerve fibers are more readily remains a common technique used alone or in combination activated with a shorter duration of current compared with sensory with ultrasound guidance. The developing utility of combining nerves. The association between current and needle-to-nerve distance these 2 techniques signals an opportunity to review the history predicts that less current is needed to evoke a motor response as the and present the status of nerve stimulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment for Acute Pain: an Evidence Map Technical Brief Number 33
    Technical Brief Number 33 R Treatment for Acute Pain: An Evidence Map Technical Brief Number 33 Treatment for Acute Pain: An Evidence Map Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2015-0000-81 Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center Minneapolis, MN Investigators: Michelle Brasure, Ph.D., M.S.P.H., M.L.I.S. Victoria A. Nelson, M.Sc. Shellina Scheiner, PharmD, B.C.G.P. Mary L. Forte, Ph.D., D.C. Mary Butler, Ph.D., M.B.A. Sanket Nagarkar, D.D.S., M.P.H. Jayati Saha, Ph.D. Timothy J. Wilt, M.D., M.P.H. AHRQ Publication No. 19(20)-EHC022-EF October 2019 Key Messages Purpose of review The purpose of this evidence map is to provide a high-level overview of the current guidelines and systematic reviews on pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for acute pain. We map the evidence for several acute pain conditions including postoperative pain, dental pain, neck pain, back pain, renal colic, acute migraine, and sickle cell crisis. Improved understanding of the interventions studied for each of these acute pain conditions will provide insight on which topics are ready for comprehensive comparative effectiveness review. Key messages • Few systematic reviews provide a comprehensive rigorous assessment of all potential interventions, including nondrug interventions, to treat pain attributable to each acute pain condition. Acute pain conditions that may need a comprehensive systematic review or overview of systematic reviews include postoperative postdischarge pain, acute back pain, acute neck pain, renal colic, and acute migraine.
    [Show full text]