DOCSLIB.ORG

South Coast Resource Management Plan Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Coast Resource Management Plan Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Palm Springs–SouthCoast Field Office BLM South Coast Resource Management Plan Draft Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Volume 1: Bureau of Land Management Chapters 1 through 3 August 2011 South Coast Draft Resource Management Plan Revision and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management California Desert District Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California ABSTRACT The Draft South Coast Resource Management Plan Revision and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DRMP/DEIS) describes and analyzes four alternatives for managing approximately 300,820 acres of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administered land in the coastal region of five Southern California counties. Information provided by the public, other agencies and organizations, and BLM personnel has been used to develop and analyze the alternatives in the DRMP/DEIS. Alternative A is the No-action Alternative and represents continuation of current management. Alternative B, the Conservation Alternative, generally places emphasis on the maximum preservation of the Planning Area’s natural and cultural resources. Alternative C, the Public Use Alternative generally provides more opportunities for development such as oil and gas and renewable energy, saleable minerals, rights-of-way, and enhanced recreational opportunities while ensuring that resource protection is not compromised. Alternative D, the BLM Preferred Alternative, emphasizes coordination with regional habitat conservation planning and provides for a balance between authorized resource use and the protection and long-term sustainability of sensitive resources. Major issues addressed in the DRMP/DEIS include coordination with local governments for habitat conservation; lands, realty, energy and minerals management; recreation and public access; designation and management of Special Areas; wildland fire, fuels, and rangeland management; protection of cultural resources; and management of visual resources. MISSION STATEMENT The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the balanced management of the BLM-administered lands and resources and their various values so that they are considered in a combination that will best serve the needs of the American people. Management is based upon the principles of multiple use and sustained yield; a combination of uses that take into account the long-term needs of future generations for renewable and nonrenewable resources. These resources include recreation, range, timber, minerals, watershed, fish and wildlife, wilderness, and natural, scenic, scientific, and cultural values. August 2011 i United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs/South Coast Field Office 1201 Bird Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92262 Voice (760) 833-7100 Fax (760) 833-7199 August 2011 Dear Reader: Enclosed for your review and comment is the Bureau of Land Management’s Draft Resource Management Plan Revision and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the South Coast Planning Area. This document describes and analyzes a range of alternatives that updates and revises the existing South Coast Resource Management Plan, published in 1994. Among these alternatives, the BLM’s preferred alternative is identified, as well as a description of the no-action alternative, a continuation of the existing management plan. The South Coast Resource Management Plan (RMP) provides guidance for the management of approximately 300,000 acres of BLM administered public lands and sub-surface minerals in portions of five Southern California counties: San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and Los Angeles. Since completion of the original South Coast RMP in 1994, new circumstances have prompted the need for a revision of the plan. These include continued population growth and urban development, the creation of multi-jurisdictional habitat conservation plans in San Diego and Riverside Counties, designation of wilderness, land acquisitions to support habitat conservation by the BLM and other agencies, and the changing needs and interests of the public. The BLM appreciates all those who contributed their time and expertise to this planning effort, including other federal, state, and local government agencies, public organizations, tribal entities, and interested members of the public that attended scoping meetings or provided comments. Public collaboration led to shaping of issues and alternatives which address land use allocations and designations of areas requiring special management including Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, lands with wilderness character- istics, recreation, access and transportation, utility corridors, grazing allotments, wildlife management areas, and land disposal categories. In developing the Proposed RMP and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the decision maker may select various management decisions from each of the alternatives analyzed in the Draft RMP/EIS. Comments from the public may also lead to a change in the preferred alternative or in development of a new alternative. The Proposed RMP or new alternative in the Final EIS may be a combination of existing alternatives or an alternative within the spectrum of alternatives already analyzed for the purpose of creating a management strategy that best meets the needs of the resources and values of the public lands within the South Coast Planning Area. Release of the Draft RMP and Draft EIS initiates a 90-day public comment period. Written comments will be considered in the development of the Proposed RMP and Final EIS. The BLM encourages the public to provide information and comments pertaining to the Draft RMP/EIS, particularly feedback concerning the adequacy and accuracy of the proposed alternatives, the analysis of their respective manage- ment decisions, and any new information that would help the BLM as it develops the plan. If you wish to submit comments on the Draft RMP/EIS, we request that you make your comments as specific as possible. Comments will be more helpful if they include suggested changes, sources, or methodologies, and reference to a section or page number. Comments containing only opinion or preferences will be considered and included as part of the decision making process, however, such comments will not receive a formal response from the BLM. Comments will be accepted for ninety (90) calendar days following the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) publication of its Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. Comments may be submitted electronically at: www.blm.gov/ca/palmsprings. Comments may also be submitted by mail to: South Coast RMP, Bureau of Land Management, Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office, 1201 Bird Center Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262, or by FAX at (760) 833-7199. To facilitate analysis of comments and information submitted, we strongly encourage you to submit comments in an electronic format. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. If public meetings are held by BLM to provide an overview of the document, respond to questions, and take public comments, these will be announced by local media, website, and/or public mailings at least 15 days in advance. Copies of the Draft RMP/EIS have been sent to affected Federal, state and local government agencies, as well as affected tribal governments. Copies of the Draft RMP/EIS are available for public inspection at the BLM Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office (see address above), and the BLM California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825. Thank you for your continued interest in the public lands of Southern California. We appreciate the information and suggestions you contribute to the planning process. For additional information or clarification regarding this document or the planning process, please contact Greg Hill, RMP Team Lead, BLM Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office at (760) 833-7140 or [email protected]. Sincerely, John R. Kalish Field Manager READER’S GUIDE How to Use this Document This Draft Resource Management Plan Revision/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft RMP/Draft EIS) is presented in five chapters and appendices, consistent with federal requirements that guide the preparation of an EIS. Chapter 1 sets the stage by describing the purpose and need for its preparation as well as providing key background information. Chapter 2 describes several potential management approaches, or “alternatives.” This document describes four alternative land use plans, including the no action alternative and a preferred alternative. Chapter 3 describes the environment, or resources, that would be affected by the decisions contained in the individual alternatives. Chapter 4 describes the impacts of the potential decisions on these resources. Chapter 5 describes the actions undertaken to provide open and effective participation from members of the public, as well as from organizations, governmental agencies, and consultation with the tribes that all have a stake in the outcome of this process. The appendices and glossary provide more detailed information, which some readers may find helpful
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary Manager's Report Fiscal Year 2015
    Summary Manager’s Report Fiscal Year 2015 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, and Similar Designations Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Page 2 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) National Landscape Conservation System (National Conservation Lands) manages 873 units, including 46 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas (NCAs), and similar designations. The National Conservation Lands are uniquely diverse. They encompass red-rock deserts and rugged ocean coastlines, deep river canyons and broad Alaskan tundra. Many areas are remote and wild, but others are surprisingly accessible. The National Conservation Lands also protect our cultural legacy. They safeguard American Indian cliff dwellings and cultural sites and preserve the remaining traces of our nation’s historic trails. These units are the most well-known and well-visited of the National Conservation Lands. The management of these special units supports the BLM’s mission of sustaining the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. This report summarizes the successes and challenges from each unit as reported through the annual “Manager’s Reports” for fiscal year 2015. McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area, Colorado Page 3 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 Recreation Mapping In 2015, the National Conservation Lands office achieved its goal of developing standardized recreation maps for every National Monument and National Conservation Area and posting those maps on recreation-focused web pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report
    Climate Understanding & Resilience in the River Valley Tijuana River Valley Existing Conditions Report Prepared by the Tijuana River National Estuarine Research Reserve for the CURRV project’s Stakeholder Working Group Updated April 14, 2014 This project is funded by a grant from the Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. Also, supported in part by a grant from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) Science Collaborative. 1 Table of Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resources and Geography ........................................................................................................................... 6 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Topography & Floodplain ....................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrology ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Manual 6100-National Landscape Conservation System
    Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Release BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 6-131 Date MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET 07/13/2012 Subject 6100 – National Landscape Conservation System Management Manual (Public) 1. Explanation of Material Transmitted: This release is the foundation Manual Section for the program-specific Manuals in the 6100 National Landscape Conservation System series. This manual provides general policy for all units of the BLM’s National Landscape Conservation System. 2. Reports Required: none 3. Material Superseded: none 4. Filing Instructions: File as directed below. REMOVE INSERT All of 6100 (Total 19 sheets) /s/ Mike Pool Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management BLM Manual 6100-National Landscape Conservation System Table of Contents 1.1 Purpose. ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Objectives. ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Authority. ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Responsibility. ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 1. 5 References. .................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Issues in the Tijuana River Basin Newsletter
    International Boundary and Water Commission United States and Mexico Volume 2, October 2017 TRANSBOUNDARY ISSUES IN THE TIJUANA RIVER BASIN NEWSLETTER Minute 320 Spill Investigation On February 1, 2017, a section of the 48-inch diameter “Insurgentes” Sewer Collector collapsed near the confluence of the Rio Alamar and Tijuana River, in Tijuana, Baja California causing an undetermined amount of wastewater to be released into the Tijuana River flowing through Mexico and the United States. The International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico (IBWC) initiated an investigation into the cause and to understand issues that arose from that action. The final report entitled, “Report of Transboundary Bypass Flows into the Tijuana River” was released in April 2017. The report is available for download on the IBWC web site (www.ibwc.gov). Recommendations made to address the issues as determined in the report were presented to the Minute 320 workgroups to initiate. The recommendations are: • Acquire the equipment needed to address spills in the future. • Installation of flow meters to monitor flows in the system and to determine the volume of wastewater entering the river in the event of another spill. • Development of communication protocols both local and binational. • Assess the current infrastructure to determine infrastructure improvements to prevent future breaks and to contain spills. • Repair and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. • Expanded water quality monitoring. • Tours and observations of critical needs sites. 2 Equipment needed to address emergency situations To date, CESPT, the Tijuana municipal utility, has acquired one of the two pumping trucks needed to divert flow in a 60-inch line similar to the pipe that ruptured in February.
    [Show full text]
  • National Conservation Lands
    ^ BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) system of National Conservation Lands includes approximately 36 million acres of nationally significant landscapes with outstanding historic, cultural, ecological, and The Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument in central scientific values. Congress and presidents have Montana protects a historic landscape that is tremendously popular for outdoor recreation. The monument includes key provided specific designations to these lands segments of the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the to conserve, protect, and restore them for the Nez Perce National Historic Trail, as well as the Fort Benton National Historic Landmark. benefit of current and future generations. PHOTO BY BOB WICK/BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The National Conservation Lands FY 2021 Appropriations Request system include BLM lands with the following congressional and presidential Please support $49.5 million for the Bureau of Land designations: Management’s National Conservation Lands in the FY 2021 • National Monuments Interior Appropriations bill. • National Historic Trails • National Scenic Trails • Wild and Scenic Rivers APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies • Wilderness Areas AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management • Wilderness Study Areas ACCOUNT: Management of Lands and Resources • National Conservation Areas ACTIVITY: National Landscape Conservation System (National • Additional areas designated by Conservation Lands)
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion (Opinion) in Accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), As Amended (16 U.S.C
    In Reply Refer to: FWS-SDG-15B0072-20F1452 November 17, 2020 Sent Electronically Memorandum To: Regional Endangered Species Program Manager Sacramento, California From: Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California Subject: Intra-Service Formal Section 7 Consultation for the Issuance of an Amendment to the County of San Diego’s Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit (PRT-840414) for the Multiple Species Conservation Program, San Diego Subarea Plan to address the Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16 and 19, San Diego County, California This document transmits the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) biological opinion (Opinion) in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), regarding the issuance of an amendment to the incidental take permit (ITP) for the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) County of San Diego (County) Subarea Plan (Subarea Plan) for Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16 and 19 (Project) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The Service issued the Section 10(a)(1)(B) permit (PRT-840414) to the County for their Subarea Plan on March 17, 1998. The permit duration is for 50 years. The County is requesting the Amendment to change the footprint of the Project, as well as add incidental take coverage for the federally endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino; QCB) and San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegonensis; SDFS). The MSCP is a comprehensive, 50-year habitat conservation plan program that addresses urban development and the needs of 85 covered species and the preservation of natural vegetation communities within a 582,243-acre planning area in southwest San Diego County (City of San Diego 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Special Management Areas for Federal Public Lands
    Definitions of Special Management Areas for federal public lands Many different types of land management are applied to federal lands under as variety of regulations and prescriptions. By Gary Sprung Communications Director, International Mountain Bicycling Association, Nov. 18, 1997 The following areas or categories of areas, sites, and potential systems are regional, national, and international in scope and are managed totally or in conjunction with another agency, locale, or entity by the Bureau of Land Management. Most of these categories also apply to U. S. Forest Service areas. They are not listed in any particular order or sequence. The term "special" is limited to those areas and programs identified therein and may be expanded depending upon subsequent program and organizational capabilities at the Headquarters Office. Definitions are subject to refinement and currently form their basis from a variety of sources, i.e., statutory, policy, and program guidance. Comments to improve the definitions are encouraged. NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM: An area designated by Congress to assure that increasing population, expanding settlement, and growing mechanization does not occupy and modify all areas of the United States. Designation ensures that certain lands are preserved and protected in their natural condition. A wilderness in contrast with those areas where man and his works dominate the landscape, is recognized where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Encauzamiento Del Arroyo Alamar Y Construcción De La Vialidad Vía Rápida Alamar Del Km
    Encauzamiento del Arroyo Alamar y Construcción de la Vialidad Vía Rápida Alamar del Km. INSTITUTO MUNICIPAL DE PLANEACION 0+000 (Inicio de canalización de la 2da etapa del Río Tijuana) al Km.10+205 (Puente Cañón del Padre de la Autopista Tijuana-Tecate) en el Municipio de Tijuana, Baja California. Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Regional del Proyecto: “Encauzamiento del Arroyo Alamar y Construcción de la Vialidad Vía Rápida Alamar del Km. 0+000 (Inicio de canalización de la 2da etapa del Río Tijuana) al Km.10+205 (Puente Cañón del Padre de la Autopista Tijuana-Tecate) en el Municipio de Tijuana, Baja California” QUE PRESENTA: INSTITUTO MUNICIPAL DE PLANEACIÓN (IMPlan) ELABORADO POR: FEBRERO, 2007 Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental Modalidad Regional Hoja 1 Encauzamiento del Arroyo Alamar y Construcción de la Vialidad Vía Rápida Alamar del Km. INSTITUTO MUNICIPAL DE PLANEACION 0+000 (Inicio de canalización de la 2da etapa del Río Tijuana) al Km.10+205 (Puente Cañón del Padre de la Autopista Tijuana-Tecate) en el Municipio de Tijuana, Baja California. CONTENIDO I. DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO, DEL PROMOVENTE Y DEL RESPONSABLE DEL ESTUDIO...6 II. DESCRIPCION DE LAS OBRAS O ACTIVIDADES.....................................................................................14 III. VINCULACIÓN CON LOS INSTRUMENTOS DE PLANEACIÓN Y ORDENAMIENTOS JURÍDICOS APLICABLES................................................................................................................................................50 IV. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL SISTEMA
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Senate Appropriations Interior Subcommittee FY22 BLM
    March 17, 2021 The Honorable Jeff Merkley The Honorable Lisa Murkowski Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Interior, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Environment and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations Committee on Appropriations United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Merkley and Ranking Member Murkowski: Thank you for increasing funding for key Bureau of Land Management (BLM) accounts in the FY2021 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. As you prepare the FY2022 Interior Appropriations bill, we encourage you to build on that important work by including at least $21.131 million for BLM’s cultural resources account and at least $65.131 million for the National Conservation Lands. The BLM manages the largest, most diverse, and most scientifically important body of cultural, historical, and paleontological resources of any federal land management agency. Yet only about 10 percent of BLM lands have been surveyed for cultural resources. We urge the Committee to provide at least $21.131 million—an increase from FY2021 of $1.5 million—for the BLM’s cultural resources management account to help BLM fulfill its statutory requirements to inventory and protect cultural resources, manage paleontological resources, and improve government-to-government consultation with Indian tribes. This modest increase in funding would also support ongoing collaboration with state historic preservation officers in the West to standardize and integrate cultural resources data for BLM lands through the National Cultural Resources Information Management System (NCRIMS). This effort is a significant and often overlooked preservation success story. It funds predictive modeling and data analysis, in partnership with state historic preservation offices, to support planning for large scale cross-jurisdictional and other projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus Forbesii) Management Plan
    Final Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress (Cupressus forbesii) Management Plan Prepared by: Susana Rodriguez-Buritica & Katharine Suding University of California, Berkeley Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management Berkeley, CA 94720 & Kristine Preston Nature Reserve of Orange County 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Game 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Contract # P0750005 01 & Nature Reserve of Orange County May 17, 2010 Santa Ana Mountains Tecate Cypress Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Orange County’s Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) was established in 1996 to conserve sensitive plant and animal species on approximately 37,000 acres. Tecate cypress (Cupressus forbesii) is a rare endemic species restricted to several locations in southern California and northern Baja California. The northern most population of Tecate cypress occurs in the Santa Ana Mountains within the NCCP/HCP Central Reserve and receives regulatory coverage under the Plan. This population is threatened by too frequent wildfire. The Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC) oversees monitoring and management of species within the NCCP/HCP and formed the Tecate Cypress Management Committee (TCMC) to develop a management plan for this species. The committee is composed of land owners, land managers and regulatory agencies with an interest in conserving Tecate cypress in the NCCP/HCP. This management plan was developed by NROC based upon the work of researchers from UC Berkeley and input from the TCMC. The objectives of this management plan included determining the current distribution and demographic structure of the Santa Ana Mountains Tecate cypress population and using this data in ecological models to assess threats to persistence and to identify restoration sites for enhancing the population.
    [Show full text]